(19)
(11)EP 0 304 480 B1

(12)EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION

(45)Mention of the grant of the patent:
17.06.1992 Bulletin 1992/25

(21)Application number: 88903083.9

(22)Date of filing:  11.03.1988
(51)International Patent Classification (IPC)5C01B 21/00
(86)International application number:
PCT/US8800/772
(87)International publication number:
WO 8807/024 (22.09.1988 Gazette  1988/21)

(54)

PROCESS FOR THE REDUCTION OF NITROGEN OXIDES IN AN EFFLUENT USING SUGAR

VERFAHREN ZUR REDUKTION VON STICKSTOFFOXIDEN IN ABGASEN MITTELS ZUCKER

PROCEDE UTILISANT DU SUCRE POUR LA REDUCTION D'OXYDES AZOTES PRESENTS DANS UN EFFLUENT


(84)Designated Contracting States:
AT BE CH DE FR GB IT LI LU NL SE

(30)Priority: 13.03.1987 US 25350

(43)Date of publication of application:
01.03.1989 Bulletin 1989/09

(73)Proprietor: FUEL TECH, INC.
Stamford, CT 06906 (US)

(72)Inventors:
  • EPPERLY, William, Robert
    New Canaan, CT 06840 (US)
  • SULLIVAN, James, Christopher
    Westport, CT 06880 (US)

(74)Representative: VOSSIUS & PARTNER 
Postfach 86 07 67
81634 München
81634 München (DE)


(56)References cited: : 
  
  • CHEMICAL ABSTRACTS, vol. 90, August 1979, page 343, abstract no. 60485e, Columbus, Ohio, US; & JP-A-78 94 293 (H. NISHIDE et al.) 18-08-1978
  
Note: Within nine months from the publication of the mention of the grant of the European patent, any person may give notice to the European Patent Office of opposition to the European patent granted. Notice of opposition shall be filed in a written reasoned statement. It shall not be deemed to have been filed until the opposition fee has been paid. (Art. 99(1) European Patent Convention).


Description


[0001] The present invention relates to a process for the reduction of nitrogen oxides (Nox) in the effluent, especially the oxygen-rich effluent, from the combustion of a carbonaceous fuel by injection of a treatment agent comprising sugar into the effluent.

[0002] Carbonaceous fuels can be made to burn more completely, and with reduced emissions of carbon monoxide and unburned hydrocarbons, when the oxygen concentrations and air/fuel ratios employed are those which permit high flame temperatures. When fossil fuels are used to fire large utility boilers, temperatures above 1093°C (2000°F) and typically 1204°C (2200°F) to 1649°C (3000°F) are generated. Unfortunately, such high temperatures, as well as hot spots of higher temperatures, tend to cause the production of thermal NOx, the temperatures being so high that free radicals of oxygen and nitrogen are formed and chemically combine as nitrogen oxides. Nitrogen oxides can form even in circulating fluidized bed boilers which operate at temperatures which typically range from 704°C (1300°F) to 927°C (1700°F).

[0003] Nitrogen oxides, especially NO₂, are troublesome pollutants which are found in the combustion effluent streams of boilers when fired as described above, and comprise a major irritant in smog. It is further believed that nitrogen oxides can undergo a process known as photo-chemical smog formation, through a series of reactions in the presence of sunlight and hydrocarbons. Moreover, nitrogen oxides comprise a major portion of acid rain.

[0004] Unfortunately, the temperatures within a utility or circulating fluidized bed boiler render most common methods of reducing NOx concentrations, such ns effluent scrubbing or catalyst grids, either uneconomical, infeasible, or both.

Background Art



[0005] Various methods and compositions for reducing the NOx concentration in the effluent from the combustion of a carbonaceous fuel have been proposed. For instance, US-A-4,208,386 discloses a method for reducing NOx in combustion effluents by injecting urea, either as a solid powder or in solution, at effluent temperatures in excess of 704°C (1300°F). The preferred urea solutions are those having at least 10 weight percent urea. For operation at temperatures below 871°C (1600°F), the use of reducing materials such as paraffinic, olefinic, aromatic and oxygenated hydrocarbons, as well as hydrogen, are required.

[0006] WO-A-87/02023 discloses the use of a solution which comprises urea and hexamethyl enetetramine (HMTA) to reduce the NOx concentration in oxygen-rich effluents having temperatures above 704°C (1300°F). Similarly, US-A-4,719,092 discloses a solution comprising urea and an oxygenated hydrocarbon solvent which is disclosed as being effective at reducing NOx concentrations with reduced ammonia slippage in effluents at temperatures above 871°C (1600°F).

[0007] Although the prior art processes for reducing nitrogen oxides concentrations are generally effective, there exists a present need for a process which elicits still further NOx reductions in an economical and convenient manner.

[0008] The present invention relates to a process for reducing nitrogen oxides in the effluent from the combustion of a carbonaceous fuel. More particularty, the present invention relates to a process which comprises injecting into the oxygen-rich effluent from the combustion of a carbonaceous fuel a treatment agent comprising sugar at a temperature greater than 704°C (1300°F). Most preferably, the sugar comprises sucrose.

[0009] For the purposes of this description, all temperatures herein are measured using an unshielded K-type thermocouple. Unless otherwise indicated, all parts and percentages are based on the weight of the composition at the particular point of reference.

[0010] The term "sugar" as used in this description refers to any useful saccharide or carbohydrate material or mixture thereof which is capable of decreasing the NOx concentration in an effluent under conditions as described herein, including non-reducing and reducing water soluble mono-saccharides and the reducing and non-reducing polysaccharides and their degradation products, such as pentoses including aldopentoses, methyl pentoses, ketopentoses like xylose and arabinose, deoxyaldoses like rhaminose, hexoses and reducing saccharides such as aldo hexoses like glucose, galactose and mannose, ketohexoses like fructose and sorbose, disaccharides like lactose and maltose, non-reducing disaccharides like sucrose and other polysaccharides such as dextrin and raffinose, hydrolyzed starches which contain as their constituents oligosaccharides, water dispersible polysaccharides and water soluble or dispersible cellulosic materials such as cellulose acetate.

[0011] The treatment agent of this invention most preferably further comprises urea. The term "urea" as used in this description includes the compound urea itself, as well as compounds equivalent in effect. Thus, unless otherwise specified, reference in this disclosure to urea should not be taken as limiting to urea itself, but should extend to urea and all of its equivalents.

[0012] Advantageously, the treatment agent of this invention is injected into the effluent in solution. Aqueous solutions are preferred due to their economy and the fact that they can be employed with suitable effectiveness in most situations. The effective solutions will range from saturated to dilute. While water is an effective solvent for most applications, it will be recognized that there may be instances where other solvents may be advantageously used, either atone or in combination with water, as would be known to the skilled artisan.

[0013] The level of sugar present in the solution is advantageously in the range of 0.5% to 30% by weight, preferably 5% to 20% by weight. Where urea is employed in the treatment agent, it should preferably be present in the solution in the range of 2% to 60%, most preferably 5% to 30% by weight. The weight ratio of sugar to urea, when urea is used with sugar as the treatment agent in solution, should advantageously be 1:10 to 4:1, more preferably 1:5 to 3:1. The most preferred weight ratio of sugar to urea in the solution is 1:4 to 2.5:1.

[0014] The temperature of the effluent at the point of injection will have an influence on the concentration of the solution. At temperatures of 704°C (1300°F) to 927°C (1700°F), the solution will tend to operate effectively at high concentration, e.g., 10% to 65% by weight treatment agent. On the other hand, at temperatures in excess of 927°C (1700°F), the solution will tend more towards dilute. At these higher temperatures, water (or the solvent in case of non-aqueous solutions) may comprise greater than 80%, 85% or even 90% by weight of the solution.

[0015] The treatment agent of this invention is preferably injected into the effluent in an amount effective to elicit a reduction in the nitrogen oxides concentration in the effluent. Advantageously, the treatment agent of this invention is injected into the effluent in an amount sufficient to provide a molar ratio of the nitrogen contained in the treatment agent to the baseline nitrogen oxides level of 1:5 to 10:1. More preferably, the treatment agent is injected into the effluent to provide a molar ratio of treatment agent nitrogen to baseline nitrogen oxides level of 1:3 to 5:1, most preferably 1:2 to 3:1. Where urea is not present in the treatment agent, the treatment agent is preferably injected into the effluent to provide the weight ratio of treatment agent to the baseline nitrogen oxides level of 1:5 to 10:1.

[0016] In situations where the treatment agent comprises urea as well as sugar, the injection ratio can alternatively be expressed as the normalized stoichiometric ratio (NSR) of the treatment agent to the baseline nitrogen oxides level. Normalized stoichiometric ratio is the ratio of the concentration of NHx radicals (NHx radicals, with x being an integer, are believed to be the moiety contributed by urea which facilitates the series of reactions resulting in NOx breakdown) to the concentration of nitrogen oxides in the effluent and can be expressed as [NHx]/[NOx].

[0017] The treatment agent, whether in solution or injected in pure form, is injected into the effluent gas stream at a point where the effluent is at a temperature above 704°C (1300°F), preferably above 760°C 1400°F., more preferably above 789°C (1450°F). Large industrial and circulating fluidized bed boilers of the types employed for utility power plants and other large facilities wilt typically have access only at limited points. In the most typical situations, the boiler interior in the area above the flame operates at temperatures which at full load approach 1038°C (1900°F), even 1093°C (2000°F). After subsequent heat exchange, the temperature will be lower, usually in the range between 704°C (1300°F) and 1038°C (1900°F). At these temperatures, the treatment agent of this invention can be effectively introduced to accomplish substantial reduction of nitrogen oxides in the effluent.

[0018] The treatment agent utilized according to this invention is preferably injected at a number of spaced positions from nozzles or other apparatus which are effective to uniformly distribute the treatment agent through the combustion effluent.

[0019] The effluent into which the treatment agent of this invention is injected is oxygen-rich, meaning that there is an excess of oxygen in the effluent. Advantageously, the excess of oxygen is greater than 1% by volume. Most preferably, the excess of oxygen is in the range of 1% to 12% or greater by volume.

[0020] It will be understood that the NOx reducing treatment agents of this invention are useful not only where substantial nitrogen oxides reductions are accomplished by directly applying the disclosed method as the principal NOx reducing method, but can also be employed as a discrete step in combination with other chemical, catalytic or other procedures for reducing nitrogen oxides concentrations as well as other pollutants such as sulfur dioxide (SO₂), while preferably controlling levels of residual pollutants such as ammonia and/or carbon monoxide.

[0021] An advantageous aspect of the practice of this invention is in the reduced production of other pollutants, such as ammonia and carbon monoxide, during the nitrogen oxides reduction process. The presence of ammonia in the effluent should be avoided because, among other reasons, it can react with SO₃ to form ammonium bisultate which can foul heat exchange surfaces in a boiler. Moreover, ammonia has detrimental effects on ambient air quality, as has carbon monoxide. The reason for the lower levels of ammonia and carbon monoxide is not fully understood but is probably because the series of reactions involving sugar, urea and NOx which lead to the reduction of NOx concentrations simply does not produce substantial amounts of other pollutants as byproducts.

[0022] The following examples further illustrate and explain the invention by detailing the operation of a treatment agent comprising sugar in the reduction of nitrogen oxides emissions.

Example I



[0023] The burner used is a burner having an effluent flue conduit, known as a combustion tunnel, approximately 531 cm (209 inches) in length and having an internal diameter of 20 cm (8 inches) and walls 5 cm (2 inches) thick. The burner has a flame area adjacent the effluent entry port and flue gas monitors adjacent the effluent exit port to measure the concentration of compositions such as nitrogen oxides, sulfur oxides, ammonia, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, percent excess oxygen and other compounds of interest which may be present in the effluent. The effluent flue conduit additionally has thermocouple ports for temperature measurement at various locations. The temperature of the effluent into which the treatment agents are injected is measured at the point of injection utilizing a K-type thermocouple. Atomizing injectors are positioned through ports in the effluent flue conduit in order to introduce and distribute the treatment agents into the effluent stream. The burner fuel is a Number 2 fuel oil, and the burner is fired at a rate of 4.0 to 4.4 kg/h (8.8 to 9.6 lbs/h).

[0024] A baseline nitrogen oxides concentration reading is taken prior to beginning each run to calculate the injection ratio of treatment agent to baseline nitrogen oxides and the NSR (when appropriate), and a final nitrogen oxides reading is taken during and downstream from injection of the treatment agents to calculate the reduction in the nitrogen oxides concentration in the effluent elicited by each of the treatment agents injected.

[0025] The following runs are made:

1. An aqueous solution comprising 15% by weight of sucrose is injected at a rate of 300 ml/h into the effluent at a temperature of 721°C (1330°F) and an excess of oxygen of 3.2%. The results are set out in Table 1.

2. An aqueous solution comprising 10% by weight of urea, 15% by weight of sucrose and 0.1% by weight of a commercially available surfactant is injected at a rate of 200 ml/h into the effluent at a temperature of 860°C (1580°F) and an excess of oxygen of 3.1% to provide an NSR of 1.44. The results are set out in Table 1.

3. An aqueous solution comprising 10% by weight of urea, 15% by weight of sucrose and 0.1% by weight of a commercially available surfactant is injected at a rate of 150 ml/h into the effluent at a temperature of 860°C (1580°F) and an excess of oxygen of 3.3% to provide an NSR of 1.07. The results are set out in Tabte 1.

4. An aqueous solution comprising 10% by weight of urea, 15% by weight of sucrose and 0.1% by weight of a commercially available surfactant is injected at a rate of 100 ml/h into the effluent at a temperature of 860°C (1580°F) and an excess of oxygen of 3.3%to provide an NSR of 0.70. The results are set out in Table 1.

5. An aqueous solution comprising 10% by weight of urea, 15% by weight of sucrose and 0.1% by weight of a commercially available surfactant is injected at a rate of 200 ml/h into the effluent at a temperature of 854°C (1570°F) and an excess of oxygen of 4.4% to provide an NSR of 1.31. The results are set out in Table 1.

6. An aqueous solution comprising 10% by weight of urea, 15% by weight of sucrose and 0.1% by weight of a commercially available surfactant is injected at a rate of 200 ml/h into the effluent at a temperature of 846°C (1555°F) and an excess of oxygen of 6.0% to provide an NSR of 1.29. The results are set out in Table 1.

7. An aqueous solution comprising 10% by weight of urea, 15% by weight of cellulose acetate and 0.1% by weight of a commercially available surfactant is injected at a rate of 300 ml/h into the effluant at a temperature of 821°C (1510°F) and an excess of oxygen of 3.2% to provide an NSR of 2.31. The results are set out in Table 1.

8. An aqueous solution comprising 10% by weight of urea, 15% by weight of corn syrup and 0.1% by weight of a commercially available surfactant is injected at a rate of 300 ml/h into the effluent at a temperature of 816°C (1500°F) and an excess of oxygen of 3.1% to provide an NSR of 2.33. The results are set out in Table 1.





[0026] It is clear from Table 1 that the injection of sugar into an effluent, especially in the presence of urea, leads to significant reductions in the nitrogen oxides concentration of the effluent, while substantially avoiding the production of other pollutants, such as ammonia.

[0027] The above description is for the purpose of teaching the person of ordinary skill in the art how to practice the present invention, and it is not intended to detail all of those obvious modifications and variations of it which will become apparent to the skilled worker upon reading the description. It is intended, however, that all such obvious modifications and variations be included within the scope of the present invention which is defined by the following claims.


Claims

1. A process for the reduction of the concentration of nitrogen oxides in the effluent from the combustion of a carbonaceous fuel, the process comprising injecting a treatment agent which comprises sugar into the effluent wherein the effluent is oxygen-rich and at a temperature greater than 704°C (1300°F).
 
2. The process of claim 1 wherein said treatment agent further comprises urea.
 
3. The process of claim 1 or 2 wherein said sugar comprises sucrose.
 
4. The process of any of claims 1 to 3 wherein the temperature of the effluent is greater than 788°C (1450°F).
 
5. The process of any of claims 1 to 4 wherein the temperature of the effluent is below 1093°C (2000°F).
 
6. The process of any of claims 2 to 5 wherein said treatment agent is injected into the effluent at a molar ratio of the nitrogen contained in said treatment agent to the baseline nitrogen oxides level of 1:5 to 10:1.
 
7. The process of claim 6 wherein the molar ratio of treatment agent nitrogen to the baseline nitrogen oxides level is 1:3 to 5:1.
 
8. The process of any of claims 1 to 7 wherein said treatment agent is in solution.
 
9. The process of claim 8 wherein said solution comprises an aqueous solution.
 
10. The process of claims 8 or 9 wherein urea, if applicable, is present in said solution in an amount of 2% to 60% by weight.
 
11. The process of claims 8 or 9 wherein sugar is present in said solution in an amount of 0.5% to 25% by weight.
 
12. The process of claim 1 wherein said effluent has an excess of oxygen of no greater than 12% by volume.
 
13. The process of claim 12 wherein maid excess of oxygen in the effluent is 1% to 6% by volume.
 
14. The process of any of claims 1 to 3 and 5 to 13 wherein the temperature of the effluent is 788°C (1450°F) to 1038°C (1900°F).
 


Ansprüche

1. Verfahren zur Verringerung der Konzentration an Stickoxiden im Abgas aus der Verbrennung eines kohlenstoffhaltingen Treibstoffs, bei dem ein Behandlungsmittel, das Zucker umfaßt, in das Abgas eingespritzt wird, wobei das Abgas sauerstoffhaltig ist, und bei einer Temperatur von mehr als 704 °C (1300 °F).
 
2. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, bei dem das erwähnte Behandlungsmittel zusätzlich Harnstoff umfaßt.
 
3. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1 oder 2, bei dem der erwähnte Zucker Saccharose umfaßt.
 
4. Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 3, bei dem die Abgastemperatur mehr als 788 °C (1450 °F) beträgt.
 
5. Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 4, bei dem die Abgastemperatur weniger als 1093 °C (2000 °F) beträgt.
 
6. Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 2 bis 5, bei dem das erwähnte Behandlungsmittel in einem Molverhältnis des in dem erwähnten Behandlungsmittel enthaltenen Stickstoffs zum Basisgehalt an Stickoxiden von 1:5 bis 10:1 in das Abgas eingespritzt wird.
 
7. Verfahren nach Anspruch 6, bei dem das Molverhältnis des Stickstoffs im Behandlungsmittel zum Basisgehalt an Stickoxiden 1:3 bis 5:1 beträgt.
 
8. Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 7, bei dem sich das erwähnte Behandlungsmittel in Lösung befindet.
 
9. Verfahren nach Anspruch 8, bei dem die erwähnte Lösung eine wäßrige Lösung umfaßt.
 
10. Verfahren nach Anspruch 8 oder 9, bei dem sich in der erwähnten Lösung Harnstoff, falls anwendbar, in einer Menge von 2 bis 60 Gew.-% befindet.
 
11. Verfahren nach Anspruch 8 oder 9, bei dem sich in der erwähnten Lösung Zucker in einer Menge von 0,5 bis 25 Gew.-% befindet.
 
12. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, bei dem das erwähnte Abgas einen Überschuß an Sauerstoff aufweist, der nicht mehr als 12 Vol.-% beträgt.
 
13. Verfahren nach Anspruch 12, bei dem der erwähnte Überschuß an Sauerstoff im Abgas 1 bis 6 Vol.-% beträgt.
 
14. Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 3 und 5 bis 13, bei dem die Abgastemperatur 788 °C (1450 °F) bis 1038 °C (1900 °F) beträgt.
 


Revendications

1. Procédé de réduction de la concentration d'oxydes d'azote dans l'effluent issu de la combustion d'un combustible carboné, le procédé consistant à injecter un agent de traitement qui comprend du sucre dans l'effluent, dans lequel procédé l'effluent est riche en oxygène et la température est supérieure à 704°C (1300°F).
 
2. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel l'agent de traitement précité comprend par ailleurs de l'urée.
 
3. Procédé selon la revendication 1 ou 2, dans lequel le sucre est constitué de saccharose.
 
4. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 3, dans lequel la température de l'effluent est supérieure à 788°C (1450°F).
 
5. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 4, dans lequel la température de l'effluent est inférieure à 1093°C (2000°F).
 
6. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 2 à 5, dans lequel l'agent de traitement précité est injecté dans l'effluent selon un rapport molaire de l'azote contenu dans l'agent de traitement au taux d'oxydes d'azote de base de 1:5 à 10:1.
 
7. Procédé selon la revendication 6, dans lequel le rapport molaire de l'azote de l'agent de traitement au taux d'oxydes d'azote de base de 1:3 à 5:1.
 
8. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 7, dans lequel l'agent de traitement précité est en solution.
 
9. Procédé selon la revendication 8, dans lequel la solution précitée est une solution aqueuse.
 
10. Procédé selon la revendication 8 ou 9, dans lequel l'urée est le cas échéant présente dans la solution précitée à raison de 2 à 60 % en poids.
 
11. Procédé selon la revendication 8 ou 9, dans lequel le sucre est présent dans la solution précitée à raison de 0,5 à 25 % en poids.
 
12. Procédé selon la revendication 1 , dans lequel l'effluent présente un excès d'oxygène qui n'est pas supérieur à 12 % en volume.
 
13. Procédé selon la revendication 12, dans lequel l'excès d'oxygène dans l'effluent est de 1 à 6 % en volume.
 
14. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 3 et 5 à 13, dans lequel la température de l'effluent est de 788°C (1450°F) à 1038°C (1900°F).