(19)
(11)EP 3 505 722 B1

(12)EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION

(45)Mention of the grant of the patent:
26.08.2020 Bulletin 2020/35

(21)Application number: 19157150.4

(22)Date of filing:  06.05.2015
(51)International Patent Classification (IPC): 
E21B 43/12(2006.01)
E21B 37/00(2006.01)
F04B 47/02(2006.01)
F04B 49/12(2006.01)
E21B 28/00(2006.01)
E21B 47/00(2012.01)
F04B 49/00(2006.01)
F04B 49/06(2006.01)

(54)

SUBTERRANEAN PUMP WITH PUMP CLEANING MODE

UNTERIRDISCHE PUMPE MIT PUMPENREINIGUNGSMODUS

POMPE SOUTERRAINE AYANT UN MODE DE NETTOYAGE DE POMPE


(84)Designated Contracting States:
AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

(30)Priority: 05.05.2015 US 201514704079
08.05.2014 US 201461990492 P

(43)Date of publication of application:
03.07.2019 Bulletin 2019/27

(62)Application number of the earlier application in accordance with Art. 76 EPC:
15788917.1 / 3140547

(73)Proprietor: Unico, LLC
Franksville, WI 53126-0505 (US)

(72)Inventors:
  • PETERSON, Ronald G.
    Racine, WI Wisconsin 53405 (US)
  • BENDER, Jonathan D.
    Bakersfield, CA California 93312 (US)

(74)Representative: Ashton, Gareth Mark et al
Baron Warren Redfern 1000 Great West Road
Brentford TW8 9DW
Brentford TW8 9DW (GB)


(56)References cited: : 
US-A- 4 098 340
  
      
    Note: Within nine months from the publication of the mention of the grant of the European patent, any person may give notice to the European Patent Office of opposition to the European patent granted. Notice of opposition shall be filed in a written reasoned statement. It shall not be deemed to have been filed until the opposition fee has been paid. (Art. 99(1) European Patent Convention).


    Description

    FIELD OF THE INVENTION



    [0001] The present invention relates generally to sucker rod pump systems as more particularly to cleaning debris from a downhole pump.

    BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION



    [0002] Sucker rod pumps occasionally encounter solid particles or "trash" during operation. Oftentimes these solids pass harmlessly through the pump. Other times the debris will cause the pump traveling and/or standing valves to not properly seat (stick open, for example). If the traveling or standing valve do not properly seat, the pump will malfunction, adversely affecting the production rate of fluid.

    [0003] It would therefore be desirable to have a pumping system that addresses some of the aforementioned problems, and further includes embodiments of construction which is both durable and long lasting. It would also be desirable if this pumping system required little or no maintenance to be provided by the user throughout its operating lifetime. Additionally, it would be desirable if the aforementioned pumping system were of inexpensive construction to thereby afford it the broadest possible market. Finally, it is also an objective that all of the aforesaid advantages and objectives be achieved without incurring any substantial relative disadvantage. US 4098340 discloses cleaning of downhole well pump valves in situ, comprising letting the pump rod string fall under gravity to pass down well fluid through the travelling valve at a substantially higher rate of speed than encountered during normal operation.

    [0004] The disadvantages and limitations of the background art discussed above are substantially overcome by the present invention.

    SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION



    [0005] According to the invention, there is disclosed a method to dislodge debris from a pump system, as defined in any one the appended claims. The pump system includes a downhole pump coupled to a rod string to an above-ground pump actuator which is coupled to a controller. The controller is configured to operate the pump system, wherein the pump actuator has an adjustable stroke length.

    [0006] The method includes determining that the pump system should begin operating in a Pump Clean Mode. Upon start, the Pump Clean Mode is implemented by the controller. The controller cycles the pump actuator at a preset command speed using a preset starting stroke length, preset acceleration rate, and a preset deceleration rate. The controller continues to cycle the pump actuator while incrementally decreasing the stroke length at a preset stroke length increment resulting in increased pump cycling frequencies. The controller determines that the Pump Clean Mode is complete and returns the pump system to a normal operation mode.

    [0007] The method may also include impressing a preset vibration frequency during a portion of the pump stroke of a pump cycle. In some circumstances the vibration frequency is the pump system rod string resonant frequency.

    [0008] In another embodiment, the preset command speed of the Pump Clean Mode is a full speed operation for the pump system. In a further embodiment, the controller determines that the pump system should begin operating in the clean mode when it determines that the pump system output has decreased.

    [0009] The controller can also be configured wherein the step of determining that the Pump Clean Mode is complete comprises determining that the stroke length has become less than or equal to a preset minimum stroke length. The Pump Clean Mode can be implemented in the controller by one of remote telemetry, by a key pad coupled to the controller, or the controller can be configured to automatically operate at a preset time, after a preset stroke count, or automatically upon detection of a malfunction of the pump.

    [0010] A further embodiment provides that the step of determining that the Pump Clean Mode is complete includes determining that a preset number of cycles of the pump system have been completed in the Pump Clean Mode.

    [0011] Such an apparatus should be of construction which is both durable and long lasting, and it should also require little or no maintenance to be provided by the user throughout its operating lifetime. In order to enhance the market appeal of such an apparatus, it should also be of inexpensive construction to thereby afford it the broadest possible market. Finally, the advantages of such an apparatus should be achieved without incurring any substantial relative disadvantage.

    DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS



    [0012] These and other advantages of the present disclosure are best understood with reference to the drawings, in which:

    FIG. 1 is an illustration of a linear rod pumping apparatus coupled to a sucker pump type of a downhole pumping apparatus, incorporating an embodiment of the invention.

    FIG. 2 is a schematic illustration of the linear rod pumping apparatus coupled to a wellhead decoupled from a walking beam pumping apparatus, incorporating an embodiment of the invention.

    FIG. 3 is a flow chart of an exemplary embodiment of a Pump Clean Mode configured in a controller of the linear rod pumping apparatus as illustrated in FIG. 1, in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.

    FIGS. 4A and 4B are graphical illustrations showing normal operation of a sucker rod pump type of linear rod pumping apparatus as configured for five strokes per minute (SPM).

    FIGS. 5A and 5B are graphical illustrations showing exemplary system performance during a transition from normal operation of the linear rod pumping apparatus to a Pump Clean Mode, in accordance with an embodiment of the invention.

    FIG. 6 is a series of exemplary graphical illustrations showing dynamometer trend traces illustrating a stuck valve of the pump and dynamometer traces before and after a Pump Clean Mode operation, according to an embodiment of the invention.

    FIGS. 7-9 illustrate exemplary Well Reports generated by the controller illustrated in FIG. 1 at time periods, respectively, prior to a stuck valve event, during a valve stuck open, and after a Pump Clean Mode operation, according to an embodiment of the invention.

    FIG. 10 illustrates an exemplary pump load trend during a stuck valve event and after initiation of a Pump Clean Mode process, according to an embodiment of the invention.


    DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS



    [0013] Sucker rod pumps typically are used in down-hole wells in petroleum production such as oil and gas. During a typical operation, the pump may lose efficiency because of debris sucked into the pump causing loss of production and maintenance costs.

    [0014] FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of a first exemplary embodiment of a linear rod pumping system 100 mounted on the well head 54 of a hydrocarbon well 56. The well includes a casing 60 which extends downward into the ground through a subterranean formation 62 to a depth sufficient to reach an oil reservoir 64. The casing 60 includes a series of perforations 66, through which fluid from the hydrocarbon reservoir enter into the casing 60, to thereby provide a source of fluid for a down-hole pumping apparatus 68, installed at the bottom of a length of tubing 70 which terminates in an fluid outlet 72 at a point above the surface 74 of the ground. The casing 60 terminates in a gas outlet 76 above the surface of the ground 74.

    [0015] For purposes of this application a sucker rod pump is defined as a down-hole pumping apparatus 69 that includes a stationary valve 78, and a traveling valve 80. The traveling valve 80 is attached to a rod string 82 extending upward through the tubing 70 and exiting the well head 54 at the polished rod 52. Those having skill in the art will recognize that the down-hole pumping apparatus 68, in the exemplary embodiment of the invention, forms a traditional sucker-rod pump 69 arrangement for lifting fluid from the bottom of the well 56 as the polished rod 52 imparts reciprocal motion to rod string 82 and the rod string 82 in turn causes reciprocal motion of the traveling valve 80 through a pump stroke 84. In a typical hydrocarbon well, the rod string 82 may be several thousand 0.3m (feet) long and the pump stroke 84 may be several 0.3m (feet) long.

    [0016] As shown in FIG. 1, the first exemplary embodiment of a linear rod pump system 100, includes an above-ground actuator 92, for example a linear mechanical actuator arrangement 102, a reversible motor 104, and a control arrangement 106, with the control arrangement 106 including a controller 108 and a motor drive 110. The linear mechanical actuator arrangement 102 includes a substantially vertically movable member attached to the polished rod 52 for imparting and controlling vertical motion of the rod string 82 and the sucker-rod pump 69.

    [0017] The reversible motor, for example an electric motor or a hydraulic motor of a linear rod pump apparatus, includes a reversibly rotatable element thereof, operatively connected to the substantially vertically movable member of the linear mechanical actuator arrangement 102 in a manner establishing a fixed relationship between the rotational position of the motor 104 and the vertical position of a rack. As will be understood, by those having skill in the art, having a fixed relationship between the rotational position of the motor 104 and the vertical position of the polished rod 52 provides a number of significant advantages in the construction and operation of a sucker-rod pump apparatus, according to the invention.

    [0018] FIG. 2 shows an exemplary embodiment of a linear rod pumping apparatus 200, mounted on a standoff 202 to the well head 54, and operatively connected for driving the polished rod 52. In FIG. 2, the exemplary embodiment of the linear rod pumping apparatus 200 is illustrated adjacent to the walking beam pumping apparatus 50, to show the substantial reduction in size, weight, and complexity afforded through practice of the invention, as compared to prior approaches utilizing walking beam apparatuses 50.

    [0019] As shown in FIG. 2, the exemplary embodiment of the linear rod pumping apparatus 200 includes a linear mechanical actuator arrangement 204 which, in turn, includes a rack and pinion gearing arrangement having a rack and a pinion operatively connected through a gearbox 210 to be driven by a reversible electric motor 104.

    [0020] Occasionally debris will dislodge or clear as a result of normal operation of the pump, with no intervention required. Other times it is necessary for a crew to use specialized equipment to "flush" the pump, or possibly even pull the pump out of the wellbore for inspection and remediation. Some operators may attempt to "bump down," where the pump and rod string are dropped from a short distance in an attempt to dislodge the debris through the shock of the pump plunger striking the bottom. These types of interventions are expensive and time consuming. Furthermore, lost production when the pump is malfunctioning can be a major loss of revenue for the producer.

    [0021] The methods described herein are for an autonomous process for clearing debris from a typical sucker rod pump system with little or no user intervention required, ultimately resulting in increased profit for the petroleum producer through increased production and reduced maintenance costs. Embodiments of the invention include a process, as disclosed herein, in which may be embedded into the sucker rod pumping unit prime mover (a controlled drive system).

    [0022] In one embodiment, the process is implemented in a Unico LRP® sucker rod pumping unit system. A Pump Clean Mode 300, as illustrated in the flowchart of FIG. 3, is embedded in the controller 108, and can be used to automatically clear debris from the pump. The Pump Clean Mode 300 routine can be executed by a control arrangement 106 which includes at least one of a remotely (through, for example RFI or WiFi telemetry), at a pump system keypad, automatically at preset times, or automatically if the controller 108 detects a malfunctioning pump valve 78, 80.

    [0023] In general, the Pump Clean Mode 300 vibrates the pump at strategic predetermined frequencies for a predetermined time, for example approximately two minutes to dislodge debris on the pump valve 78, 80, allowing the debris to pass through the valves 78, 80 and into the pipe string 82 of the wellbore 60. More specifically, in certain embodiments, there are two separate phases to the Pump Clean Mode 300: 1) High speed normal operation with vibration during the upstroke of the pump; and 2) High speed oscillation of the pumping unit by progressively shortening the pumping stroke.

    [0024] Referring again to FIGS. 1 and 2, the act of vibrating the pumping unit causes kinetic energy to be transmitted to the downhole pump 68 via the rod-string 82 in the form of shock loads in excess of the normal pump operational loads. The acceleration peaks of the shock loads serve to jar debris loose. The vibration is most useful during the upstroke of the pump, when the traveling valve 80 attempts to seat.

    [0025] To maximize the energy of the shock load (peaks) transferred to the down-hole pump 68, it is desirable to oscillate the rod string 82 at its natural resonant frequency. This can be accomplished incidentally by sweeping through a frequency spectrum, or by targeting the rod-string resonant frequency, calculated with the following equation:



    [0026] In this equation, f is the natural frequency and M is the mass of the rod 52, which is found by dividing the weight (W) by gravity M=W/g. K is the stiffness of the rod and depends upon the length of the rod, its Modulus of Elasticity (material property), and the moment of inertia.

    [0027] One method for sweeping frequencies is to progressively shorten the pump stroke 84 while operating the pumping unit at full speed, causing a corresponding increase in stroking frequency (strokes per minute). At some point during this sweep, the stroking frequency will match the rod-string natural frequency. An added benefit to this technique is establishment of a state whereby both the traveling and standing valves 78, 80 of the sucker rod pump 69 are opened simultaneously, allowing loosened debris to backflow through the pump and be deposited at the bottom of the wellbore.

    [0028] To summarize, the Pump Clean Mode 300 vibrates the pumping unit during the upstroke and oscillates the rod-string 82 at various frequencies by progressively shortening the pumping stroke. The flowchart of FIG. 3 illustrates an embodiment of the Pump Clean Mode 300 process. The Pump Clean Mode 300 is included in the controller 108. In a particular embodiment, the controller 108, shown in FIG. 1, will use estimated down-hole states including pump load and position to determine the best operating mode. These down-hole states can also be used to detect a stuck valve condition, as demonstrates in the following examples below. If the controller 108 detects a stuck valve condition, the Pump Clean Mode 300 can be initiated in the controller 108 by one of the four ways described above.

    [0029] In FIG. 3, the Pump Clean Mode 300 is initialized at start 302, then in sequence:
    304 Cycle pumping unit up and down in a normal manner, at preset high speed, with preset hard acceleration and deceleration rates, with a preset vibration frequency introduced during the upstroke;
    306 Increment stroke counter after the pumping unit has completed a full stroke;
    308 If stroke counter is greater than preset amount X, then move to block 310, else continue to execute 304;
    310 Shorten stroke length by preset amount Y, causing the pumping unit to stroke (up and down) a shorter distance than previously;
    312 Cycle pumping unit up and down in a normal manner, at preset high speed, with preset hard acceleration and deceleration rates. The unit is now cycling with a shorter stroke length, and hence the stroking frequency (strokes per minute) is increased;
    314 Increment stroke counter after the pumping unit has completed a full stroke;
    316 If stroke counter is greater than preset amount Z, then move to block 318 (Pump Clean cycle is complete - return to normal operation), else continue to execute 310 (progressively shorten stroke length);

    Laboratory Simulation Of Pump Clean Mode



    [0030] FIGS. 4A and 4B are graphical illustrations showing normal operation of a 1.4m (56-inch) sucker rod pump, for example a linear rod pump, on an example well (1219m (4,000 feet) deep, 3.8 cm (1.5 inch) pump, 1.9 cm (¾ inch) steel rods). Rod position 400 is shown in units of 2.54cm (inches), rod velocity 402 is shown in units of 2.54 cm/sec (inch/sec) in FIG. 4A, while in FIG. 4B downhole pump velocity 406 is shown in units of 2.54 cm/sec (inch/sec), and downhole pump acceleration 408 is shown in units of 2.54 cm/sec2 (inch/sec2). Pump acceleration 408 is shifted down by 40 units on the vertical axis for clarity.

    [0031] FIGS. 5A and 5B are graphical illustrations showing exemplary system performance during a transition from normal operation to the Pump Clean Mode 300. FIG. 5A shows an increase in rod velocity 502 after the transition to Pump Clean Mode 300., and FIG. 5B shows that pump velocity 406 and acceleration 408 are increased when resonant frequencies are excited (as compared to FIG. 4B). The pump motor 104 vibrates during the pump upstroke, and the stroke length gets progressively shorter, causing the stroking rate (strokes per minute) to increase. At the rod string resonant frequency, the pump dynamic force (acceleration) is maximized, thus imparting a disruptive force on the debris. At high oscillation frequency, both valves, standing 78 and traveling 80, will remain open, allowing the debris to pass through the pump and into the well "rathole."

    Field Results Of Pump Clean Mode



    [0032] The linear rod pump system 100 including the controller 108 configured with Pump Clean Mode 300 was deployed with a remote monitoring system on an oil well. The pump periodically produces solids that cause the traveling valve 80 to stick open. A remote monitoring system of the pump system 100 provides operational and diagnostic reports including an alarm if the pump system 100 malfunctions, such as a pump valve 80 becoming stuck, at which time the Pump Clean Mode 300 feature may be initiated.

    [0033] The traveling valve 80 was observed to stick occasionally during normal operation of the sucker rod pump 69. In some cases the problem would clear by itself. Other times it would persist indefinitely. The Pump Clean Mode 300 successfully restored normal operation to the pump 68 subsequent to a stuck traveling valve 80 event. The charts of FIGS. 6 to 10 illustrate one such example.

    [0034] FIG.6 shows an exemplary display 600 that includes a dynamometer trend leading up to the stuck valve 80 and subsequent to the Pump Clean Mode 300 implementation in the controller 108. In particular embodiments, the display 600 would be available to remote users operating the pump system 100 via remote telemetry. The dynamometer trend is illustrated in a series of graphs include a first graph 602 showing pump system operation prior to the stuck valve 80. First graph 602 shows a production rate of 21781 litres (137 barrels) per day (BPD) and a pump fill rate of 100%. A first load graph 608 illustrating the rod load vs. rod position during normal operation is also shown. The data is collected by the controller 108 and reported using a remote well monitoring tool (not shown).

    [0035] A second graph 604 shows pump system operation after the valve 80 becomes stuck. In this graph 604, the production rate has fallen to zero and the pump fill rate is -2. A second load graph 610 shows the change in rod load vs. rod position, when the valve 80 is stuck as compared to that shown during normal operation. In certain embodiments, the operator is alerted to the problem from the remote monitoring system summary trend 910, as shown in FIG. 10. The summary trend 910 also shows that the production rate is an estimated zero litres barrels per day (BPD), while the pump fill was -2, and the pump load was zero (no fluid being lifted). It can also be seen from FIGS. 6 and 10 that the problem was observed to be persistent. A third graph 606 shows pump system operation after the implementation of the Pump Clean Mode 300 in which all parameters and a third load graph 612 are returned to normal.

    [0036] FIG. 7 shows an exemplary first Well Report 700 generated by the controller 108 prior to the stuck valve 80 (i.e., normal operation). The dynamometer plots 702, 704 show pump operation is operating properly. The inferred production rate is 21781 litres per day (137 BPD) and the pump fill monitor shows that the pump fill rate is 100%. In the embodiment of FIG. 7, the first Well Report 700 includes data for the following parameters: Pumping Unit Specification; Road and Pump Data; Operating Conditions: Fluid Production Data; Power Statistics; Liquid and Gas Statistics; Loading Statistics; Well and Fluid Data; Operating Statistics; Gauged Statistics; Gearbox and Balance; and Diagnostics. In, alternative embodiments, the Well Report 700 could include a fewer or greater number of operating parameters.

    [0037] FIG. 8 shows an exemplary second Well Report 800 generated by the controller 108 when the pump traveling valve 80 is stuck open. The dynamometer plots 802, 804 reveal that the pumping unit is raising and lowering only the weight of the rod string (no fluid load). This condition is indicated in the Fluid Production Data section by a 0 litres per day production rate, and in the Liquid and Gas Statistics section by a -2 pump fill rate. The problem could either be a parted rod (near the pump) or a stuck valve 80. In this example, it is a stuck valve 80.

    [0038] In particular embodiments, the operator initiates remotely the Pump Clean Mode 300, after which the pump valve operation was immediately restored. FIG. 9 shows an exemplary third Well Report 900 after the Pump Clean Mode 300 feature was executed. The dynamometer plots 902, 904 show that pump operation has returned to normal following implementation of the Pump Clean Mode 300. In particular embodiments of the invention, the controller 108 is configured to automatically execute a Pump Clean Mode 300 when a stuck valve condition is detected.

    [0039] In another example, some sticking of the pump plunger (not shown) is observable during the upstroke in FIG. 6 (the pump load bulges out). This is likely an indicator of the same solids that clogged the traveling valve 80, but in this case also interfering with the plunger. The effect is also observed in an exemplary increased pump load trend 910, generated by the controller 108 subsequent the stuck valve 80, as illustrated in FIG. 10. In the embodiment of FIG. 10, there are four event markers: Pump Average SPM 912 with accompany graph 913; Pump Fill Monitor 914 with accompany graph 915; Fluid Flow Monitor 916 with accompany graph 917; and Pump Load Monitor 918 with accompany graph 919.

    [0040] Although the foregoing description of the present invention has been shown and described with reference to particular embodiments and applications thereof, it has been presented for purposes of illustration and description and is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the particular embodiments and applications disclosed. It will be apparent to those having ordinary skill in the art that a number of changes, modifications, variations, or alterations to the invention as described herein may be made, none of which depart from the scope of the present invention defined in the claims. The particular embodiments and applications were chosen and described to provide the best illustration of the principles of the invention and its practical application to thereby enable one of ordinary skill in the art to utilize the invention in various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. All such changes, modifications, variations, and alterations should therefore be seen as being within the scope of the present invention as determined by the appended claims when interpreted in accordance with the breadth to which they are legally entitled.


    Claims

    1. A method to dislodge debris from a pump system (100), the pump system including a down-hole pump (68) coupled by a rod string (82) to an above-ground pump actuator (102) which is coupled to a controller (108) configured to operate the pump system, wherein the pump actuator (102) has an adjustable stroke length, the method comprising:

    determining that the pump system (100) should begin operating in a pump clean mode (300); and

    implementing the pump clean mode (300) configured in the controller (108), wherein the pump clean mode (300) comprises:

    cycling (306) the pump actuator (102) at a preset command speed using a preset starting stroke length, preset acceleration rate and a preset deceleration rate;

    continuing (310) to cycle the pump actuator (102) while incrementally decreasing the stroke length by a preset stroke length increment resulting in increased pump cycling frequencies;

    determining (316) that the pump clean mode (300) is complete; and

    returning (318) the pump system to a normal operation mode.


     
    2. The method of Claim 1, further including impressing a preset vibration frequency during a portion of a pump stroke of a pump cycle.
     
    3. The method of Claim 2, wherein the preset vibration frequency is the pump system rod string (82) resonant frequency.
     
    4. The method of Claim 1, wherein the preset command speed is a full speed for the pump system.
     
    5. The method of Claim 1, wherein the step of determining that the pump system should begin operating in the pump clean mode (300) comprises determining that a preset number of cycles of the pump system (100) have been completed in the normal operation mode.
     
    6. The method of Claim 1, wherein the step of determining that the pump system (100) should begin operating in the pump clean mode (300) comprises determining that a pump system output has decreased.
     
    7. The method of Claim 1, wherein the step of determining that the pump clean mode (300) is complete comprises determining that a preset number of cycles of the pump system have been completed in the pump clean mode.
     
    8. The method of Claim 1, wherein the step of determining that the pump clean mode (300) is complete comprises determining that the stroke length has become less than or equal to a preset minimum stroke length.
     
    9. The method of Claim 1, wherein the implementation of the pump clean mode (300) is accomplished by a control arrangement (106) configured with one of remote telemetry, key pad, automatically at preset time, and automatically upon detection of a malfunction of the pump.
     


    Ansprüche

    1. Verfahren zum Entfernen von Schmutz aus einem Pumpensystem (100), wobei das Pumpensystem eine Bohrlochpumpe (68) aufweist, die durch einen Stangenstrang (82) mit einem oberirdischen Pumpenantrieb (102) gekoppelt ist, der mit einer Steuerung (108) gekoppelt ist, die so konfiguriert ist, dass sie das Pumpensystem betreibt, wobei der Pumpenantrieb (102) eine einstellbare Hublänge aufweist, das Verfahren umfassend:

    Bestimmen, dass das Pumpensystem (100) in einem Pumpenreinigungsmodus (300) zu arbeiten beginnen soll; und,

    Implementieren des in der Steuerung (108) konfigurierten Pumpenreinigungsmodus (300), wobei der Pumpenreinigungsmodus (300) umfasst:

    zyklisches Betätigen (306) des Pumpenantriebs (102) mit einer voreingestellten Solldrehzahl, unter Verwendung einer voreingestellten Starthublänge, einer voreingestellten Beschleunigungsrate und einer voreingestellten Verzögerungsrate;

    Fortsetzen (310) des zyklischen Betätigens des Pumpenantriebs (102), während die Hublänge schrittweise um eine voreingestellte Hublängenschrittweite verringert wird, was zu erhöhten Pumpenzyklusfrequenzen führt;

    Bestimmen (316), dass der Pumpenreinigungsmodus (300) abgeschlossen ist; und

    Zurückkehren (318) des Pumpensystems in einen normalen Betriebsmodus.


     
    2. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, ferner enthaltend das Aufprägen einer voreingestellten Schwingungsfrequenz während eines Abschnitts eines Pumpenhubs eines Pumpzyklus.
     
    3. Verfahren nach Anspruch 2, wobei die voreingestellte Schwingungsfrequenz die Pumpensystem-Stangenstrang (82)-Resonanzfrequenz ist.
     
    4. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, wobei die voreingestellte Solldrehzahl eine volle Drehzahl für das Pumpensystem ist.
     
    5. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, wobei der Schritt des Bestimmens, dass das Pumpensystem im Pumpenreinigungsmodus (300) zu arbeiten beginnen soll, das Bestimmen umfasst, dass eine voreingestellte Anzahl von Zyklen des Pumpensystems (100) im normalen Betriebsmodus abgeschlossen worden ist.
     
    6. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, wobei der Schritt des Bestimmens, dass das Pumpensystem (100) im Pumpenreinigungsmodus (300) zu arbeiten beginnen soll, das Bestimmen umfasst, dass die Leistung des Pumpensystems abgenommen hat.
     
    7. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, wobei der Schritt des Bestimmens, dass der Pumpenreinigungsmodus (300) abgeschlossen ist, das Bestimmen umfasst, dass eine voreingestellte Anzahl von Zyklen des Pumpensystems im Pumpenreinigungsmodus abgeschlossen worden sind.
     
    8. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, wobei der Schritt des Bestimmens, dass der Pumpenreinigungsmodus (300) abgeschlossen ist, das Bestimmen umfasst, dass die Hublänge kleiner oder gleich einer voreingestellten minimalen Hublänge geworden ist.
     
    9. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, wobei die Implementierung des Pumpenreinigungsmodus (300) durch eine Steueranordnung (106) durchgeführt wird, mit einem ausgewählt aus Ferntelemetrie, Tastenfeld, automatisch zu einer voreingestellten Zeit, und automatisch bei Feststellung einer Fehlfunktion der Pumpe.
     


    Revendications

    1. Procédé pour déloger des débris d'un système de pompe (100), le système de pompe comportant une pompe de fond (68) couplée par un train de tiges (82) à un actionneur de pompe de surface (102), qui est couplé à une unité de commande (108) configurée pour faire fonctionner le système de pompe, dans lequel l'actionneur de pompe (102) a une longueur de course réglable, le procédé comprenant les étapes suivantes :

    déterminer que le système de pompe (100) doit commencer à fonctionner dans un mode de nettoyage de pompe (300) ; et

    mettre en oeuvre le mode de nettoyage de pompe (300) configuré dans l'unité de commande (108), dans lequel le mode de nettoyage de pompe (300) comprend les étapes suivantes :

    faire tourner des cycles (306) d'actionneur de pompe (102) à une vitesse d'instruction prédéfinie en utilisant une longueur de course de démarrage prédéfinie, un taux d'accélération prédéfini et un taux de décélération prédéfini ;

    poursuivre (310) les cycles d'actionneur de pompe (102) tout en diminuant progressivement la longueur de course par un incrément de longueur de course prédéfini, ce qui a pour effet d'augmenter la fréquence des cycles de pompe ;

    déterminer (316) que le mode de nettoyage de pompe (300) est terminé ; et

    remettre (318) le système de pompe dans un mode de fonctionnement normal.


     
    2. Procédé de la revendication 1, comportant en outre l'impression d'une fréquence de vibration prédéfinie pendant une partie d'une course de pompe d'un cycle de pompe.
     
    3. Procédé de la revendication 2, dans lequel la fréquence de vibration prédéfinie est la fréquence de résonance du train de tiges (82) du système de pompe.
     
    4. Procédé de la revendication 1, dans lequel la vitesse d'instruction prédéfinie est une vitesse maximale pour le système de pompe.
     
    5. Procédé de la revendication 1, dans lequel l'étape consistant à déterminer que le système de pompe doit commencer à fonctionner en mode de nettoyage de pompe (300) comprend la détermination selon laquelle un nombre prédéfini de cycles du système de pompe (100) sont terminés en mode de fonctionnement normal.
     
    6. Procédé de la revendication 1, dans lequel l'étape consistant à déterminer que le système de pompe (100) doit commencer à fonctionner en mode de nettoyage de pompe (300) comprend la détermination selon laquelle une production du système de pompe a diminué.
     
    7. Procédé de la revendication 1, dans lequel l'étape consistant à déterminer que le mode de nettoyage de pompe (300) est terminé comprend la détermination selon laquelle un nombre prédéfini de cycles du système de pompe sont terminés en mode de nettoyage de pompe.
     
    8. Procédé de la revendication 1, dans lequel l'étape consistant à déterminer que le mode de nettoyage de pompe (300) est terminé comprend la détermination selon laquelle la longueur de course est devenue inférieure ou égale à une longueur de course minimale prédéfinie.
     
    9. Procédé de la revendication 1, dans lequel la mise en oeuvre du mode de nettoyage de pompe (300) est réalisée par un dispositif de commande (106) configuré avec l'un parmi une télémétrie à distance, un clavier, automatiquement à un moment prédéfini et automatiquement à la détection d'un dysfonctionnement de la pompe.
     




    Drawing



































    Cited references

    REFERENCES CITED IN THE DESCRIPTION



    This list of references cited by the applicant is for the reader's convenience only. It does not form part of the European patent document. Even though great care has been taken in compiling the references, errors or omissions cannot be excluded and the EPO disclaims all liability in this regard.

    Patent documents cited in the description