[0001] The invention relates to a process for comminuting a solid in a mill. The solid may
for example be coal, which needs to be comminuted before being fed into a steam boiler.
[0002] When a liquid such as water is added to a solid such as coal, the mixture has a consistency,
when comminuted, that depends not only on the size and shape of the solid particles,
but also on the quantity of added liquid. When dry, or nearly dry, the mixture flows
easily like a powder when poured or otherwise allowed to fall; when very wet, again
the mixture flows easily, being predominantly liquid, Most mixtures have an intermediate
stage at which the mixture substantially does not have the property of being able
to flow freely. Now, the particles in the mixture adhere to each other, or agglomerate;
the mixture is pasty, in that it is like a solid to the extent that it is capable
of holding itself in a shape, though like a liquid to the extent that it has virtually
no structural strength. An example of such a mixture is a mixture of sand and water
of a consistency suitable for the building of sand-castles. For the purpose of this
specification, the particles of solid are said to cohere with each other in such a
mixture, and the mixture itself to be cohesive.
[0003] When a mixture is passed through a mill, the time it spends in the mill (termed the
"residence time") is usually an important factor in determining how finely it is comminuted.
If the mixture is such that it flows, then gravity is what determines how quickly
the mixture goes through the mill. If the mixture is cohesive on the other hand, then
if the mill is provided with channels that move as the mill is operated, the residence
time that the mixture spends in the mill can be altered. By a careful selection of
the speeds of the mill, and size and rate of movement of the channel, a cohesive mixture
can be caused to remain indefinitely in the mill, or to feed upwards through the mill
against gravity, or to feed downwards at a rate greater than that due purely to gravity.
In a mill without such channels, even a cohesive mixture travels through the mill
under the action only of gravity, and of whatever frictional or viscuous resistances
to motion may be present.
[0004] For the purpose of this specification, a mill that has such a movable channel, so
that it is capable of transporting cohesive mixtures, is said to have a transport
capability. If the channels are arranged to transport the mixture in a direction to
assist gravity, or whatever other agency feeds the mixture into and out of the mill,
to urge the mixture through the mill, the transport is termed positive. If the channels
are arranged to transport the mixture against gravity, on the other hand, the transport
capability is a negative transport capability.
[0005] It is recognized in the invention that a mill with a positive transport capability
allows cohesive mixtures to be milled economically. Without positive transport, such
mixtures tend to remain in the mill because the particles of solid tend to cohere
not only to each other but to the mill itself. Some mixtures however, such as some
foodstuffs, have in the past had to be milled at a very sticky consistency, and it
has been necessary in such cases, in order for the mixture to pass through the mill,
to provide for a positive feed capacity-for the mill. By analogy with the positive
transport capability described above, a positive feed capacity is one in which a pressure
is exerted on the mixture to push it, or even to suck it, through the mill from inlet
to outlet, in the event that gravity is ineffective to do this. However, the provision
of such a pressure carries with it the requirement that the mill remains full, for
no voids can appear in the mixture if it is to be fed under pressure. Whilst it is
possible, and economical, to comminute in that way some mixtures such as food substances
(e.g. chocolate), other mixtures (such as coal and oil) are so stiff when cohesive
that the power consumption needed to operate a mill that is full of that mixture would
be wastefully large. In the invention, the positive transport capability allows the
mill to be used on mixtures that are so cohesive that they would not otherwise move
through the mill unless pressurized, yet the positive transport capability allows
the mill to transport such mixtures without the mill needing to be full of the mixture.
[0006] It is possible to comminute mixtures that are too sticky or too stiff to be moved
by gravity, by batch comminution. Here, a batch of the mixture is placed in the mill
when the mill is stationary, and is removed from the mill when the mill is once again
stationary, after comminution.
[0007] Thus, batch comminution needs no transport, and no feed, capability in the mill,
so that again the mill need not be full during comminution.
[0008] Batch comminution is however much less economical than continuous comminution, to
which the invention is mainly applicable.
[0009] It is further recongized in the invention that when the process of comminution of
a solid is carried out on a mixture that has a cohesive consistency, and when the
comminution is carried out in a mill having a positive transport capability, then
the efficiency of comminution depends upon the amount of liquid that has been added
to the solid to form the mixture. According to the invention, it is preferred that
the comminution is carried out using a mixture having the liquid content that maximizes
the comminution efficiency.
[0010] In the invention, the efficiency of comminution that is referred to should be understood
as being not confined to any particular measure of efficiency. What is most efficient
usually is dependent on what is most economical, which can depend on a variety of
factors.
[0011] In the particular case therefore, the miller has in mind a criterion by which the
efficiency or economy of the comminution in that case is to be measured. Sometimes
for example the criterion of economy will be the compromise between the fineness of
the comminuted powder and the power consumption of the mill Ond such a compromise
will differ in dependence on the change in price of electricity from area to area);
sometimes, as another example, the criterion of economy will be the fineness of the
powder as compromised by the capital cost of the mill required to produce that degree
of fineness in a given throughput rate of the solid.
[0012] Whatever the criterion of economy in a particular case is, the invention provides
that experiments are carried out to measure how economical (according to that criterion)
the comminution is at varying added liquid throughputs. If the experiments show that
there is a liquid throughput that gives a maximum level of economy (according to that
criterion), then that throughput is used when comminuting the solid under the particular
conditions of the case.
[0013] Of course, there are factors other than the quantity of liquid throughput that also
have an effect on the effiency of comminution. It is important therefore to keep all
the other factors constant whilst varying the added liquid throughput during the experiments.
[0014] In the experiments that are reported below in this specification, a measure of efficiency
that was of particular interest was the proportion of the , comminuted solid that
would pass through a mesh of a given fineness. Another measure of efficiency that
was investigated was the proportion of the comminuted solid passing a given mesh divided
by the power consumption needed to drive the mill.
[0015] Experiments have shown that the fineness of the comminuted solid produced by the
mill varies with the quantity of liquid added to the solid throughput. This effect
is unexpected in that the experiments show that the maximum fineness appears to correspond,
though somewhat loosely, with the mixture being at its most cohesive. The (electrical)
power required to drive the mill to comminute the solid varies also with the added
liquid throughput, being at a maximum when the mixture is at its most cohesive.
[0016] The invention will now be further described, with reference to exemplary embodiments,
as illustrated in the accompanying drawings in which:
Fig. 1 is a plan of a mill;
Fig. 2 is a perspective view of part of the mill of Fig. 1;
Figs. 3 to 10 are graphs showing how the various ordinates are a function of the amount
of liquid throughput added to the solid throughput passing through the mill.
[0017] The mill 10 shown in Figs. 1 and 2 comprises a housing 12 having an inner cylindrical
surface 14. The housing 12 is part of the fixed frame (not shown) of the mill 10.
[0018] A rotary assembly 16 is located inside the housing 12. A shaft 18 is driven by a
motor (not shown), and runs in bearing 20 housed in the fixed frame. Keyed to the
shaft 18 are drive plates 22. Mounted between the drive plates 22 are three rollers
24, which can rotate freely with respect to the plates 22 about axes parallel to the
shaft 18.
[0019] When the shaft 18 is rotated, the plates 22 rotate in unison with it, and the rollers
24 roll around the surface 14 of the housing 12. The rollers 24 run on axles 26 which
are flexible in some degree, so that the force with which the rollers 24 press against
the surface 14 is largely the centrifugal force due to the rotation of the rotary
assembly 16. Friction at the point of contact between the roller 24 and the surface
14 means that there is substantially no slipping at that point, and the roller 24
accordingly rotates in the opposite sense to the shaft 18.
[0020] To operate the mill, the mill 10 is mounted with the shaft 18 vertical, and the solid
to be milled is fed into the top of the mill, onto the upper one 22A of the drive
plates 22, from a vibratory hopper (not shown) or other suitable feed device. The
liquid is conveyed through a pipe (not shown) also into the top of the mill. The mixture
falls down into the annular gap 28 between the plate 22A and the surface 14; is milled
by the rollers 24 against the surface 14 as it passes down through the mill; and finally
passes out through a corresponding gap between the bottom plate 22B and the surface
14. The milled mixture is collected in a hopper (not shown) or other suitable collecting
means placed below the mill.
[0021] The mill has a positive transport facility, as called for in the invention, in that
the rollers 24 are each formed with a helical groove 30, comprising a transport channel.
When the rotary assembly 16 rotates, the grooves 30 will tend to transport the substance
in the mill either up or down depending on the direction of rotation of the assembly
16. A number of factors influence the extent to which the grooves impose this transport
effect on the substance.
[0022] The first factor is the consistency of the substance. Both gravity, and the grooves
can have an effect on the transport rate of the mixture through the mill. If the mixture
is very dry, then most mixtures tend to pass through the mill under gravity, the grooves
having only a comparatively slight effect. This is particularly the case with dense
materials, such as metals and ores. With light, fluffy, materials, such as pieces
of paper, the grooves can significantly affect the transport rate even though the
material is dry. Equally, if the mixture is very wet, in that it is of a very thin
and runny consistency, then again the substance tends to fall through the mill under
the action substantially only of gravity. When, on the other hand, the mixture is
a thick, pasty, sticky, cohesive mixture, the mixture can support itself to a certain
degree, and the grooves can now be extremely effective in setting the residence time
that the mixture spends in the mill.
[0023] Once the consistency of the mixture is such that its residence time is dependent
on the presence of the grooves, then the residence time is also affected by the other
factors, which include the configuration of the grooves, the number of starts, the
lead and pitch of the helix, the flank angle of the sides of the grooves, the diameters
of the rollers and of the housing, and the speeds of rotation of the rollers and shaft.
[0024] If the mixture were too wet or too dry, it would not remain long enough in the mill
to be comminuted very effectively. If it were too cohesive then without the positive
transport effect the mixture would stay in the mill indefinitely. The positive transport
capacity allows the controlled comminution of cohesive mixtures.
[0025] It is necessary though that if the grooves do create the positive transport effect,
they do not become clogged. The rotary speed of the rollers should be high enough
that centrifugal_force flings the material out of the groove, to empty the groove
at least partially. Thus the material in the groove is constantly changing. If the
mixture is extremely cohesive, it may be that the groove is so arranged that it cannot
be emptied at all: when the groove on the roller rolls over a point on the wall on
the housing the mixture is packed so tightly into the groove that it is not flung
out by centrigual force. Such a fault is not cured by increasing the speed of the
mill, since that causes the mixture to be packed even tighter. It is necessary in
such an event to increase the size of the groove, or to provide the sides of the grooves
with a flank angle.
[0026] The positive transport feature in the kind of mill illustrated in Figs. 1 and 2 may
be regarded as an axial screw conveying capability. In other mills, the positive transport
feature may be provided somewhat differently, but essentially it requires the presence
in the mill of a channel which travels, when the mill is operating, in a direction
to hold the mixture in the mill for a longer or shorter time than it would remain
in the absence of the traveling channel.
[0027] Turning now to the manner of use of the mill in the process of the invention, an
experiment is first carried out as follows. A given quantity of the solid that is
to be milled is passed through the mill in a dry condition, at a predetermined rate.
The speed of rotation of the mill, and the amount of electricity used by the motor
to maintain that speed, are both noted. The milled solid is collected and measurements
taken of the particle size prevailing in the substances.
[0028] The experiment is repeated, but this time a quantity of liquid is mixed with the
solid. The rate at which the solid is passed through the mill is kept the same as
before, so that the total aggregate quantity of both solid and liquid passing through
the mill is increased by the added quantity of liquid. Again, the particle size of
the milled solid is measured, together with the power consumption.
[0029] Further experiments are carried out, in which more and more liquid is added to the
solid that is to be milled.
[0030] Figs. 3 and 4 are graphs showing the results of these experiments, which in this
example were carried out on a mixture of coal and water. The quantity of coal fed
through the mill was the same throughout the experiments, and was 720 kg/hr. The shaft
was driven at a speed of 1250 rpm. In Fig. 3, the vertical scale is the proportion,
expressed as a percentage, of the 720 kg/hr. throughput of coal that was milled finely
enough to pass through a mesh of a predetermined size, which in the case of curve
A was a 100 mesh; curve B, 200 mesh; and curve C, 325 mesh. In Fig. 4 the vertical
scale is the measured power consumption of the electric motor driving the shaft.
[0031] It can be seen from Fig. 3 that the fineness of the milled coal is at a maximum when
the throughput of coal (i.e. the 720 kg/hr. mentioned above) was supplemented by a
throughput of just under 40%.
[0032] Such a graph as Fig. 3 naturally may be drawn for any mixtures of solids and liquids.
It is recognized in the invention that if the graph exemplified by Fig. 3 should display
such a maximum as is displayed by Fig. 3., then that maximum is useful in determining
what the consistency of the mixture should be to provide the most efficient milling;
the most efficient, that is, as determined by the prevailing fineness of a given throughput.
[0033] The mixtures on which the experiments have been carried out have all displayed or
have indicated such a maximum as that exemplified by Fig. 3. The mixtures were: coal
plus water (as described above); coal plus oil; mica plus water; zinc plus water;
and limestone plus water. The percentage of added liquid at which the maximum solid
fineness is produced was found to vary, in a somewhat unpredictable-way. Fig. 6 shows
the corresponding graph to Fig. 3 for the mixture of limestone and water, from which
it can be seen that the position of the maximum, and the profile of the graph at the
maximum, may even vary with the level of fineness that was chosen as a measure. The
upper curve A, is that for 100 mesh, or 150 microns; the middle, B, is that for 200
mesh, or 75 microns; and the lower C, is that for 325 mesh, or 45 microns. The mixture
consistency needed to produce the maximum fineness therefore depends not only on the
speed of the mill, the throughput rate, the configuration of the helix, and so on,
but also on the actual measure of the fineness itself.
[0034] It was found in the experiments with zinc and water that when very dry, milled particles
of zinc tend to agglomerate, thus negating the milling process. Zinc has to be slightly
wet for it to be milled successfully at all. Factors such as this will affect the
shape and position of the maximum on the graph such as that of Fig. 3, but as pointed
out it is the fact of the presence of the maximum that, as is recognized in the invention,
is useful.
[0035] Figs. 9 and-10 are the corresponding graphs to Figs. 3 and 5, when the feed rate
of the coal is increased to 1200 kg/hr. through the mill. The size and positions of
the various peaks can be seen to have altered, indicating again the potential importance
of factors other than the liquid content on the efficiency.
[0036] As can be seen from Fig. 4, the graph of the electric power used by the mill also
displays a maximum, in dependence on the quantity of added liquid. Again, from the
experiments, the maximum power was associated with the maximum cohesiveness of the
mixture.
[0037] The width of the maximum on the graph of power against added liquid content is less
than the width of the maximum on the graph of fineness against added liquid content.
In other words, the power peak of Fig. 4 is narrower than the fineness peak of Fig.
3. Not only is the efficiency of milling to be measured in terms of the fineness of
a given throughput, but it should also be measured in terms of the quantity of energy
consumed in producing that degree of fineness. It is recognized in the invention that
because of the difference in widths of the peaks, it is worthwhile to move slightly
away from the peaks: this will produce a large reduction in the amount of energy consumed,
but only a small reduction in the degree of fineness produced.
[0038] The graph of Fig. 5 illustrates this effect. The graph is a derivation from Figs.
3 and 4; a point on the Fig. 5 graph was found by dividing the values at the liquid
content on the Fig. 3 graph from the corresponding values from the Fig. 4 graph. A
peak on this derived graph therefore represents an effective compromise between power
consumption and fineness, insofar as these things depend upon the consistency of the
mixture. As would be expected, from an inspection of Figs. 3 and 4, the graph of Fig.
5 has two peaks. It is preferable to set the mixture strength to that of the right
hand peak of the two peaks, not only because that peak is highest (for that may not
be the case for all mixtures and conditions) but also because the right hand peak
is wider, and the wider the peak the more flexible the control means can be for keeping
the liquid content at a value that gives the peak efficiency. Furthermore, even though
the peak of Fig. 5 occurs at a mixture strength of about 50% added water throughput,
it will be noted that the efficiency falls only very slowly as the water content is
increased. There is an advantage in increasing the liquid content in that the grooves
in the mill tend to empty themselves more easily the wetter the mixture. On the other
hand, because the water may have to be dried off before the coal is fed into the boiler,
or will evaporate in the boiler, the mixture should not be too wet. It was found that
beyond about a 70% mixture strength, the benefits of increasing the water content
still further were not worth the expense of the extra drying difficulties, particularly
as the efficiency at strengths above 70% is starting to be significantly less than
that at 50%. If the grooves are big, and thus especially not prone to clogging, the
water content may be as low as 40%. Below that, the efficiency enters the trough on
the Fig. 5 curve, and comminution becomes uneconomical. Further experiments have indicated
that the corresponding range in the coal/oil mixture, that gives a corresponding maximum
efficiency, is the range from 30% to 60% added liquid.
[0039] As mentioned above, the mixtures tested all displayed the same characteristics of
having a maximum on both the fineness and the power graphs. The heights of the peaks
and their positions varied however. Figs. 7 and
8 are examples that show the power and derived graphs, corresponding to Figs. 4 and
5 respectively, for the limestone/water mixture illustrated in Fig. 6.
[0040] The liquid and solid that make up the mixture that is to be comminuted may or may
not be pre-mixed before being fed into the mill. If the solid has a powder or dust
content even before comminution, as coal often has, it may be preferable to add some
if not all of liquid to control the dust (especially if the dust is explosive) before
feeding the solid to the mill. However, the more cohesive the mixture, the more it
tends to clog the conveyors and conduits, so it is usually preferable to feed dry
solid and pure liquid separately into the mill, and thus to let all the mixing take
place actually in the mill.
[0041] Reference has been made to the mill being in the vertical position. However, it is
possible for the mill to be orientated in some other plane; horizontal for example.
The effects of gravity clearly are not the same in a horizontal mill as in a vertical
mill. However, even a horizontally orientated mill can rely purely on gravity to cause
a throughput of a mixture to traverse through the mill: a "head" of mixture may be
provided at the entrance end, the finished comminuted mixture being allowed to fall
from the exit end. Similarly, the mill may be tipped at varying angles to provide
varying gravitational effects on the throughput rate.
[0042] The material may actually be pumped into the mill, if appropriate, though the mixtures
with which the invention is mainly concerned are often too cohesive to be pumped easily.
Mixtures of coal and water, or coal ; and oil, may be pumped at all but the most cohesive
consistencies.
:
[0043] After the experiments have been concluded, the quantity of added liquid throughput
that gives the maximum efficiency can be determined from the graphs, either in terms
of the fineness of the comminuted solid, or in terms of that fineness as compromised
by the power needed to produce it or in terms of whatever other measure of efficiency
is appropriate in the particular case. After selecting the appropriate quantity of
liquid to be added in the mixture, production-scale comminution can then be proceeded
with, manual or automatic controls being set up to keep the quantity constant.
[0044] Not every mixture displays a maximum when a graph is plotted of the effect of added
liquid throughput on the comminution efficiency, and the process of the invention
is inappropriate for use with such mixtures. Ores and minerals will display
such a maximum when comminuted with water or with hydrocarbon liquids such as oil
or lighter than oil. Ceramics and metals too will display the maximum.
[0045] However, many foodstuffs such as oilseeds contain an oily liquid contained in a cellular
solid matrix, the liquid being released as soon as the cell walls are broken by milling.
These substances may not display a maximum, if their inherent liquid content puts
them on what may be termed the "wet side" of a potential maximum. In other words,
a maximum might possibly be made to appear if the mixture had liquid removed from
it rather than added to it, before comminution, but that may be quite uneconomical.
But if the material is dried before comminution, or if it is frozen, then the invention
may come to be applicable, if the maximum is displayed. Substances such as rubbers
or resins tend :to be very difficult to comminute also, unless frozen beforehand.
[0046] Other substances when comminuted tend to liquidize (that is, the solid/liquid proportion
changes) as comminution is carried out mainly as a result of the solid dissolving
in the liquid. Some substances have to be milled with a liquid content that makes
the mixture too wet to be cohesive. Some paints, for example, are in this category.
Some of the pigment powders used for paints, though, may be able to be made cohesive
without their properties being altered, and so can benefit from the invention.
[0047] Some substances that require comminution will dissolve in water, or in other cheap
liquids (many fertilizers for instance) so that with them the invention is of no benefit.
Other materials, such as cement, must be comminuted dry because their chemical nature
changes when they become wet.
[0048] The nature of the liquid can have an effect on the maximum, both on the "peakiness"
of the maximum, and on its position. For example, oil tends to soak into the pores
of coal to a less extent than does water. Therefore, less oil need be added to the
coal than water to produce - the maximum. The other carbon products, such as coke,
graphite, and carbon black, tend to display corresponding differences. This carbonaceous
material may also be comminuted in low molecular weight alcohols such as methanol
and ethanol or in any mixture of oil, water, and alcohol.
[0049] Some mixtures have rheological non-linearities, such as the tendency to become psuedoplastic,
dilatent, or thixotropic, which can affect the peakiness and position of the maximum.
1. A process for comminuting a solid in a mill, comprising the step of mixing the
solid with a liquid in such proportions that the mixture has a cohesive consistency;
wherein the mill includes moving channel means for positively transporting a cohesive
mixture through the mill from the inlet to the outlet.
2. A process as claimed in claim 1, further comprising the steps of ascertaining by
experiment on the mixture whether the efficiency of comminution varies as a function
of the proportion of liquid added to the mixture; and if so, of controlling the quantity
of liquid in the mixture substantially to be that quantity which produces the most
efficient comminution.
3. A process as claimed in claim 2 wherein the quantity of liquid is substantially
that quantity which produces the maximum percentage of comminuted solid passing a
mesh of a given size.
4. A process as claimed in claim 2 wherein the quantity of liquid is substantially
that quantity for which the numerical value of the fineness of the comminuted solid
expressed as a percentage of the comminuted solid passing a mesh of a given size divided
by the power required to operate the mill is at a maximum.
5. A process as claimed in claim 1, 2, 3 or 4, wherein the solid is coal, and the
liquid is water.
6. A process as claimed in claim 1, 2, 3 or 4 wherein the solid is coal, and the liquid
is oil.
7. A process as claimed in claim 1, 2, 3 or 4, wherein the solid is zinc, and the
liquid is water.
8. A process as claimed in claim 1, 2, 3, or 4, wherein the solid is mica, and the
liquid is water.
9. A process as claimed in claim 1, 2, 3, or 4 wherein the solid is limestone, and
the liquid is water.
10. A process as claimed in claim 5, wherein the quantity of water added to the coal
is substantially 40.% to 70% of the mass throughput of the coal.
11. A process as claimed in claim 6, wherein the quantity of oil added to the coal
is substantially 30% to 60% of the mass throughput of the coal.