(19)
(11) EP 0 309 192 A3

(12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION

(88) Date of publication A3:
28.02.1990 Bulletin 1990/09

(43) Date of publication A2:
29.03.1989 Bulletin 1989/13

(21) Application number: 88308690.2

(22) Date of filing: 20.09.1988
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC)4E05B 47/00
(84) Designated Contracting States:
BE CH DE ES FR GB IT LI NL

(30) Priority: 23.09.1987 US 99921

(71) Applicant: EMHART INDUSTRIES, INC.
Towson, Maryland 21204 (US)

(72) Inventor:
  • Lavelle, Gary Edward
    Avon Connecticut 06001 (US)

(74) Representative: Stagg, Diana Christine et al
Emhart Patents Department Emhart International Ltd. 177 Walsall Road
Birmingham B42 1BP
Birmingham B42 1BP (GB)


(56) References cited: : 
   
       


    (54) Control for electronic lock


    (57) A battery powered (40) electronic locking apparatus comprises a locking member (2) movable between a locking position and an unlocking position, a first electromechanical means (110) coupled to the locking member to drive the locking member from one of the positions to the other position upon activation of the first electromechanical means and a second electromechanical means (111) coupled to the locking member to drive the locking member from the one position to the other position upon activation of the second electromechanical means. A control means (3) activates the first electromechanical means (110) without the second electromechanical means (111) to attempt to drive the locking member from the one position to the other position to conserve power, and subsequently activates the first (110) and second (111) electromechanical means together to attempt to drive the locking mechanism (2) to the other position. This provides movement of the locking member (2) when the battery voltage is low or the locking member is bound. In addition, if one attempt by one (110) or both (110, 111) electromechanical means is unsuccessful, the control means (3) automatically activates (254, 256, 258) one or both of the electromechanical means a second time. This is effective in the event that the failure was due to torque applied by a user to a door handle which bound the locking member.







    Search report