(19) |
|
|
(11) |
EP 0 823 103 B1 |
(12) |
EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION |
(45) |
Mention of the grant of the patent: |
|
30.09.1998 Bulletin 1998/40 |
(22) |
Date of filing: 23.04.1996 |
|
(51) |
International Patent Classification (IPC)6: G07C 9/02 |
(86) |
International application number: |
|
PCT/GB9600/963 |
(87) |
International publication number: |
|
WO 9634/367 (31.10.1996 Gazette 1996/48) |
|
(54) |
APPARATUS FOR CONTROLLING ACCESS
VORRICHTUNG ZUR ZUGANGSKONTROLLE
APPAREIL DE CONTROLE D'ACCES
|
(84) |
Designated Contracting States: |
|
AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE |
(30) |
Priority: |
26.04.1995 GB 9508512
|
(43) |
Date of publication of application: |
|
11.02.1998 Bulletin 1998/07 |
(73) |
Proprietor: THORN TRANSIT SYSTEMS
INTERNATIONAL LIMITED |
|
Wells, Somerset BA5 1AA (GB) |
|
(72) |
Inventors: |
|
- TAYLOR, Robert
Keinton Mandeville,
Somerset TA11 6EG (GB)
- WEBB, Roger, Clive
Wells,
Somerset BA5 2JL (GB)
- DYKES, Norman, Alan
Somerton,
Somerset TA11 6PU (GB)
- JONES, Roger
Glastonbury,
Somerset BA6 8HB (GB)
|
(74) |
Representative: Leaman, Keith |
|
QED Patents Limited,
Dawley Road Hayes, Middlesex UB3 1HH Hayes, Middlesex UB3 1HH (GB) |
(56) |
References cited: :
EP-A- 0 045 197 DE-A- 2 004 165 DE-U- 9 314 530
|
WO-A-94/08258 DE-A- 2 326 386 GB-A- 1 263 542
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: Within nine months from the publication of the mention of the grant of the European
patent, any person may give notice to the European Patent Office of opposition to
the European patent
granted. Notice of opposition shall be filed in a written reasoned statement. It shall
not be deemed to
have been filed until the opposition fee has been paid. (Art. 99(1) European Patent
Convention).
|
[0001] This invention relates to apparatus for controlling access. It relates particularly,
though not exclusively, to a barrier for use in such apparatus.
[0002] In a known apparatus of this type called the TAG-150 Automatic Gate (available from
Takamisawa K.K in Japan), sensing means comprising a plurality of horizontally spaced
photoelectric sensors is provided to sense the presence of a person in a passage.
A ticket reading means is placed adjacent the entrance to the passage. If a person
approaches the barrier without having first presented a valid ticket to the reading
means, the barrier is controlled to be in a closed condition which prevents access.
Further sensors are provided to ensure that the barrier does not close if there is
an obstruction at the barrier position, thereby increasing passenger safety. In general,
such systems may operate in a normally open state (in which the passage is open until
the barrier is placed into its closed condition when an invalid fare and a subject
are sensed), or a normally closed state (in which the barrier is only placed into
its open condition when a valid fare and a subject are sensed).
[0003] A disadvantage with such systems is, however, that the throughput of people in such
automatic gates is low. People tend to wait at the ticket reading station until the
barrier has responded. This causes a queue at busy times or requires the owner of
the access system to purchase many more gates than would be necessary if the throughput
could be increased. If a second person without a valid ticket attempts to enter the
passage whilst a first person is still in the passage the barrier can be activated,
thus trapping the first person even although they are in possession of a valid ticket.
If a second person with a valid ticket attempts to enter the passage whilst a first
person is in the passage, they often find that the ticket reading machine will not
accept their ticket immediately because the previous person's ticket is still present
in the reading system or has not been removed from the outlet port of the ticket reading
system. These disadvantages tend to reduce throughput of the access system resulting
in queues with concomitant safety and ticket security problems.
[0004] Improved apparatus to overcome these problems has been disclosed in GB 1,207,263,
GB 1,245,189 and GB 1,263,542. The barriers described in these documents use electric
motors and conventional mechanical latches to keep the barriers in a closed condition
to prevent access. Such a solution includes many moving parts which suffer from friction
and consequently wear and require periodic maintenance.
[0005] According to the invention there is provided a barrier for use in apparatus for controlling
access, the barrier comprising a first member and a second member, the members being
coupled to one another, the first member being adapted for inhibiting access to a
passage, the second member having a surface comprising a ferromagnetic material for
cooperating with control means including an electromagnet for holding the barrier
in an open or closed condition. Preferably the members are both coupled to a pivotable
shaft.
[0006] The barrier conveniently comprises one or more members which are advantageously pivotable
about an axis in a plane substantially parallel to the direction of access.
[0007] The apparatus comprising a passage having a barrier according to the invention conveniently
comprises a means for reading fare or toll data.
[0008] Embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with
reference to the accompanying diagrammatic drawings in which :-
Figure 1 shows a side elevation of apparatus according to one embodiment of the invention,
Figure 2 shows a plan view of a plurality of passages arranged side by side, each
having a side as shown in Figure 1,
Figure 3 shows a barrier according to one embodiment of the invention,
Figure 4 shows a flow diagram of a method of controlling access.
[0009] Figure 2 shows a plan view of one example of apparatus according to the invention.
The apparatus for controlling access comprises a passage (1) having a barrier (2,
3) controllable into an open condition and a closed condition, and means (4) for reading
fare or toll data. The passage is formed between two side assemblies (5, 6).
[0010] The side assemblies are as shown in side elevation in Figure 1. Each side assembly
includes sensing means (11 - 26) for sensing the position of a plurality of subjects
in the passage and providing corresponding signals. In the present example the sensing
means comprises twenty sensor pairs, each pair comprising a transmitter (for example
a light source) on one side of the passage and a receiver (for example a photoelectric
cell detector for detecting light emitted by the light source) on the other side of
the passage. Only one member of each pair is shown in Figure 1. The sensing means
operates by sensing a break in a beam of energy travelling between the transmitter
and the receiver caused by a subject in the passage. In the present example the beam
of energy is a beam of light, however other beams such as infra-red beams or ultrasonic
beams may be used as an alternative.
[0011] The apparatus further comprises means (in the present example a microcomputer system
having a memory) for associating given data with a signal corresponding to a given
subject, and means for controlling the barrier (in the present example an electric
motor and electromagnet together with a micro-controller), such that in operation
when the given data associated with the signal corresponding to the given subject
is invalid or absent, the barrier is controlled to be in the closed condition when
the given subject approaches the barrier, thereby denying access to the given subject
whilst allowing access to any other subject having a signal associated with valid
data being in the passage between the given passenger and the barrier.
[0012] Each sensor pair is positioned such that the beam of energy travels directly across
the passage (in a direction approximately perpendicular to the direction of motion
of the subjects) from the transmitter to the corresponding receiver. For the present
we will only consider subjects entering the passage from one direction, and we shall
call one end of the passage (27) the entrance, and the other end of the passage (28)
the exit. The software operating the apparatus is arranged such that a new subject
is only recognized at the entrance to the passage. Sensors pairs 11 and 13 (called
the detection group) must both show an interrupted beam to denote a tall human subject.
Signals from this sensor pair are immediately attributed to a new subject, and the
information is stored in a memory location specific to the new subject. Signals arising
from sensors not at the entrance to the passage do not result in a new subject being
recognized.
[0013] Once a new subject is recognized and a memory location associated with the new subject
set aside, further signals caused by interrupted beams are attributed to that passenger
if the signal is from a sensor pair adjacent the sensor pair already detecting the
subject. There is no limit on the number of sensor pair signals that can be attributed
to any one subject. This feature enables subjects carrying large pieces of luggage
to be correctly sensed and monitored as they progress through the passage. If a signal
cannot be attributed to an existing passenger, then the possibility of a new passenger
is considered. A new subject is recognized if the detection group beams are interrupted
and none of them can be attributed to an existing subject. For this condition to be
true, sensor pair 14 must be cleared by all existing subjects in the passage before
sensor pair 13 is interrupted by a new subject. This is because if an existing subject
was attributed with interrupting sensor pair 14 whilst a new subject interrupts sensor
pair 13, the signals would all be attributed to the existing subject on the basis
that the sensor pair 14 is adjacent sensor pair 13. Thus the criterion for recognizing
a new subject is an interruption in sensor pair 11 and 13 but not 14.
[0014] Short human subjects are sensed in the same way as described above for tall subjects,
but in this case the relevant sensor pairs in the detection group are 11, 12 and (not)
14. Note that if a short subject jumps over sensor pair 12, it is likely that sensor
pair 13 will be interrupted instead so that the short subject will be recognized as
a tall subject. If a short subject is recognized, then sensor pair 13 will be ignored
and sensor pairs 11 and 14 will be deemed to be adjacent pairs.
[0015] Once a new subject is recognized, its position in the passage is monitored as it
interrupts sensor pairs and clears sensor pairs. Forward and/or backward motion will
be detected. Signals that cannot be reasonably attributed to an existing subject are
ignored. This feature can be helpful if there are subjects in the passage who, for
example, wave umbrellas or other items about as they move through the passage. Such
a system of monitoring subjects in the passage also makes the segregation of various
sensor pairs into different sensing "zones" as is performed in some systems unnecessary.
[0016] The sensor pairs need not necessarily comprise a transmitter on one side and a receiver
on the other side of the passage. The transmitter and receiver may be located next
to one another on the same side of the passage together with a surface which reflects
the radiation beam on the other side of the passage so that the beam is transmitted
from the transmitter across the passage, then reflected from the reflective surface
back across the passage to be received by the receiver.
[0017] To ensure passenger safety, the following measures are taken:-
a) A given barrier is never moved if any sensors in the sensor group 12 and 26 or
sensor group 23 and 25 associated with the given barrier are being interrupted. In
the present example the sensor groups 25 and 26 each comprise three sensor pairs whose
outputs are commoned together.
b) If an object is seen to interrupt sensor groups 23 and 25 together or 12 and 26
together without interrupting any other sensors it is assumed that there is a small
child in the aisle. In this case no attempt will be made to close any set of doors
until one tall subject has been tracked right along the passage or to the exit barrier
if this is closed.
c) If a valid subject apparently disappears in the middle of the passage (for example
if he kneels down, or if a bag was falsely detected as a passenger) the apparatus
is re-credited so that the barriers will not close in close proximity to him in normally
closed mode, or if an invalid subject enters the passage behind him. (This measure
also ensures that such a passenger will not lose the payment and be prevented from
passing).
[0018] In operation, when a new passenger is detected a check is made to see if a valid
ticket or card has been presented. If so the passenger shall be allowed to pass unhindered.
Otherwise, alarms are activated and the barrier or barriers at the other end of the
passage are closed as soon as possible when this will not compromise safety or prevent
valid passengers already in the passage from passing. In the present example the alarms
cease and the doors are opened again (if being operated in normally open mode) when
the invalid subject leaves the passage. If the invalid subject disappears in the middle
of the passage the barrier will remain closed until a valid ticket is presented or
a time period has elapsed. In normally closed mode, the barriers are closed again
when there are no ticket credits left and all valid subjects have passed through the
passage. They are also closed in normally open mode when there is an invalid subject
in the passage and all valid subjects have left the passage.
[0019] When a passenger is in a position to retrieve his ticket it is important to make
it difficult for him to take the ticket of any passenger following him. In the present
example this is achieved in the following way. When a ticket is captured by the apparatus
or retrieved by a subject, the next ticket will not be returned until the following
conditions are satisfied:-
a) All other valid passengers have moved passed a collection zone (for example, passed
sensor pairs 11-16 in the present example)
b) The new passenger owning the ticket to be returned has entered the passage or,
c) A time period has elapsed (regardless of passenger positions).
[0020] The system usually operates in what is known as a "normally open" mode in which the
barrier is in its open condition unless a subject associated with absent or invalid
data approaches the barrier. The apparatus may also be used in a "normally closed"
mode in which the barrier remains in its closed condition unless a subject associated
with valid data approaches the barrier. When operating in either mode the access system
can be set to either allow subjects from only one direction to obtain access or to
allow access to subjects from either direction depending upon which subject is sensed
by the system first. The former mode of operation is sometimes called the "unidirectional"
mode whilst the latter mode of operation is sometimes known as the "bi-directional"
mode.
[0021] Although a barrier which does not obstruct the passage when it is in its open condition
has been described in the above description, a turnstile or other barrier which always
obstructs the passage to some extent may be used as an alternative (although in this
case the advantage of greater throughput will not be so apparent).
[0022] The barrier shown in Figure 3 is particularly advantageous for use in the above apparatus.
In Figure 3 the barrier comprises a first member (31) and a second member (32), the
members being coupled to one another on opposite sides of a pivot (33), the first
member (31) is constructed and arranged to inhibit access to a passage, the second
member (32) having a surface (34) comprising a ferromagnetic material for cooperating
with control means including an electromagnet (not shown) to hold the barrier in an
open or closed condition. In the example shown in this figure the members are both
coupled to a pivotable shaft (33) which rotates about an axis of rotation (35). In
this example the axis of rotation is coaxial with the shaft, but other axes of rotation
may be used as an alternative. For example the shaft may be pivotable in the plane
of the axis of the shaft with an axis of rotation normal to the axis of the shaft
and the two members being coupled to either end of the shaft.
[0023] The first member (31) is padded so that if a passenger runs into the barrier when
it is in a closed condition the passenger is not badly injured. The size of the ferromagnetic
surface and the strength of the electromagnet is arranged such that a force of approximately
1100 Newton must be used to open the barrier when it is in its closed condition. The
choice of this "release" force depends upon a number of factors. Firstly, if there
is an emergency and a crowd of people are pushed against the barrier the release force
must be set sufficiently low to prevent injury to passengers by crushing. However,
the release force must not be too low or a strong passenger wanting to avoid paying
a fare or toll could just push their way through the barrier. With the present barrier
it is easy to set and change this force simply by changing the electric current flowing
to the electromagnet. Release forces in the range 700 - 2000 Newton may typically
be employed. The force may be partly mechanical in addition to electromagnetic, for
example by employing rolling element bearings which have to be forced out of locating
cups into which they are biased (by for example a strong spring), or other mechanical
systems commonly used in such barrier systems.
[0024] The main advantage of the present barrier over the prior art devices which use an
electric motor arrangement is that there is a minimum of moving parts resulting in
much lower wear and lower maintenance and replacement part costs. The barrier of the
present invention includes a magnetic latch. In the present examples, the barrier
moves towards the subject when it closes, although other directions of movement may
be employed if desired. To improve safety it is advisable to have a mechanical break
set at a similar force as that of the electromagnetic break so that if there is a
crush of people wanting to enter the passage in the opposite way to that for which
it is set up the barrier will move before injury occurs. It is also wise to have a
battery backup for such systems so that the barrier may be controlled to be in an
open condition if there is a power failure in addition to an emergency.
[0025] Figure 4 shows a flow diagram of a method of controlling access by a subject from
a first region to a second region via a passage having a barrier. In this flow diagram
of one example of a method according to the invention the numbered blocks correspond
to steps in the method. The blocks have the following significances. Block 40 denotes
reading fare or toll data from a given subject. Block 41 denotes deciding if the data
is valid or invalid. The next block (42) denotes storing a credit in a memory if the
data is valid. Block 43 denotes sensing the presence and position of the given subject
and providing at least one sensing signal as the given subject moves through the passage,
thereby providing information on the position of the given subject in the passage
with time. Block 44 denotes associating the credit or lack of a credit with the position
of the given subject in the passage. Block 45 denotes controlling the barrier to substantially
prevent access through the passage by the given subject when a lack of a credit is
in association with the position of the given subject whilst allowing access by any
other subject being in association with valid data and being in the passage between
the given subject and the barrier.
1. A barrier for use in apparatus for controlling access, the barrier comprising a first
member (31) and a second member (32), the members being coupled to one another, the
first member being adapted for inhibiting access to a passage, the second member having
a surface (34) comprising a ferromagnetic material for cooperating with control means
including an electromagnet for holding the barrier in an open or closed condition.
2. A barrier as claimed in claim 1 in which the members are both coupled to a pivotable
shaft (33).
3. A barrier as claimed in claim 2 in which the shaft is axially rotatable.
4. Apparatus for controlling access comprising a) a passage having a barrier (2,7) as
claimed in any preceding claim controllable into an open condition and a closed condition,
b) means (4) for reading fare or toll data, c) sensing means (11-26) for sensing the
position of a plurality of subjects in the passage and providing corresponding signals,
d) means for associating given fare or toll data with one or more signals corresponding
to a given subject, and e) means for controlling the barrier, such that in use when
the given fare or toll data corresponding to the given subject is invalid or absent,
the barrier is controlled to be in the closed condition when the given subject approaches
the barrier, thereby denying access to the given subject whilst allowing access to
any other subject being in the passage between the given passenger and the barrier.
5. Apparatus as claimed in claim 4 in which the means for reading fare or toll data consists
of a money collection system, and the data comprises at least one of the group including;
a credit card, a smart card, one or more coins and/or banknotes.
6. Apparatus as claimed in claim 4 in which the means for reading fare or toll data consists
of a ticket reading system, and the data comprises an encoded ticket or card.
7. Apparatus as claimed in claim 4 constructed and arranged such that the subject retains
possession of the ticket or card whilst it is being read and/or written to.
8. Apparatus as claimed in claim 4 in which the barrier comprises one or more members
which extend into the passage to a greater extent when the barrier is in the closed
condition than when the barrier is in the open condition.
9. Apparatus as claimed in claim 8 in which the one or more members are pivotable about
an axis in a plane substantially parallel to the direction of access.
10. Apparatus as claimed in claim 4 - 9 in which the apparatus includes a battery for
supplying electrical power in an emergency.
1. Barriere zur Verwendung in Vorrichtungen zur Zugangskontrolle, wobei die Barriere
ein erstes Teil (31) und ein zweites Teil (32) umfaßt, wobei die Teile miteinander
verbunden sind, das erste Teil derart gestaltet ist, daß es zur Verhinderung des Zugangs
zu einem Durchgang geeignet ist, das zweite Teil eine Oberfläche (34) mit einem ferromagnetischen
Material aufweist, zum Zusammenwirken mit Steuermitteln, welche einen Elektromagneten
enthalten, derart daß die Barriere in einem offenen oder geschlossenen Zustand gehalten
werden kann.
2. Barriere nach Anspruch 1, wobei die Teile beide mit einer schwenkbaren Welle (33)
verbunden sind.
3. Barriere nach Anspruch 2, wobei die Welle axial drehbar ist.
4. Vorrichtung zur Zugangskontrolle mit a) einem Durchgang mit einer Barriere (2, 7)
nach einem der vorstehenden Ansprüche, welche in einen offenen oder geschlossenen
Zustand gesteuert werden kann, b) Mitteln (4) zum Lesen von Entgelt- oder Gebührendaten,
c) Sensormitteln (11 - 26) zum Erkennen der Position einer Mehrzahl von Subjekten
in dem Durchgang und Zurverfügungstellen entsprechender Signale, d) Mitteln zum Zuordnen
gegebener Entgelt- oder Gebührendaten zu einem oder mehreren Signalen entsprechend
einem gegebenen Subjekt und e) Mitteln zum Steuern der Barriere derart, daß im Betrieb,
wenn die dem gegebenen Subjekt entsprechenden gegebenen Entgelt- oder Gebührendaten
ungültig oder nicht vorhanden sind, die Barriere in den geschlossenen Zustand gesteuert
wird, wenn das gegebene Subjekt an die Barriere herantritt, um so dem gegebenen Subjekt
den Zugang zu verwehren, während allen anderen Subjekten, die sich in dem Durchgang
zwischen den gegebenen Passagier und der Barriere aufhalten, Zugang gewährt wird.
5. Vorrichtung nach Anspruch 4, wobei die Mittel zum Lesen von Entgelt- oder Gebührendaten
aus einem Zahlungssystem bestehen und die Daten wenigstens eine der folgenden Gruppen
umfassen: eine Kreditkarte, eine Smart Card, eine oder mehrere Münzen und/oder Banknoten.
6. Vorrichtung nach Anspruch 4, wobei die Mittel zum Lesen von Entgelt- oder Gebührendaten
aus einem Ticket-Lesesystem bestehen und die Daten ein kodiertes Ticket oder eine
kodierte Karte umfassen.
7. Vorrichtung nach Anspruch 4, konstruiert und angelegt derart, daß das Subjekt im Besitz
des Tickets oder der Karte bleibt, während diese(s) ausgelesen und/oder beschrieben
wird.
8. Vorrichtung nach Anspruch 4, wobei die Barriere ein oder mehrere Teile umfaßt, welche
weiter in den Durchgang hineinragen wenn sich die Barriere im geschlossenen Zustand
befindet als wenn sich die Barriere im offenen Zustand befindet.
9. Vorrichtung nach Anspruch 8, wobei die ein oder mehrere Teile um eine Achse in einer
Ebene im Wesentlichen parallel zur Zugangsrichtung schwenkbar sind.
10. Vorrichtung nach Ansprüchen 4 - 9, wobei die Vorrichtung eine Batterie zum Liefern
elektrischer Energie im Notfall einschließt.
1. Barrière destinée à être utilisée dans un appareil de contrôle d'accès, la barrière
comprenant un premier élément (31) et un second élément (32), les éléments étant couplés
l'un à l'autre, le premier élément étant adapté pour interdire l'accès à un passage,
le second élément ayant une surface (34) comprenant un matériau ferromagnétique pour
coopérer avec des moyens de commande comprenant un électro-aimant pour maintenir la
barrière dans un état ouvert ou fermé.
2. Barrière selon la revendication 1, dans laquelle les éléments sont tous deux couplés
à un arbre pivotant (33).
3. Barrière selon la revendication 2, dans laquelle l'arbre peut tourner de manière axiale.
4. Appareil de contrôle d'accès comprenant a) un passage ayant une barrière (2, 7) selon
l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes pouvant être commandée pour se placer
dans un état ouvert et dans un état fermé, b) des moyens (4) pour lire les données
de tarif ou de droit de passage, c) des moyens de détection (11 à 26) pour détecter
la position d'une pluralité de sujets se trouvant dans le passage et délivrant des
signaux correspondants, d) des moyens pour associer les données de tarif ou de droit
de passage fournies à un ou plusieurs signaux correspondant à un sujet donné, et e)
des moyens pour commander la barrière, de telle sorte qu'en service, lorsque les données
de tarif ou de droit de passage fournies correspondant au sujet donné ne sont pas
valides ou sont absentes, la barrière est commandée pour être dans l'état fermé lorsque
le sujet donné s'approche de la barrière, refusant l'accès au sujet donné tout en
permettant l'accès à tout autre sujet se trouvant dans le passage entre le passager
donné et la barrière.
5. Appareil selon la revendication 4, dans lequel les moyens pour lire les données de
tarif ou de droit de passage se composent d'un système de collecte d'argent, et les
données comprennent au moins un élément du groupe se composant d'une carte de crédit,
d'une carte à puce ou d'une ou plusieurs pièces de monnaie et/ou d'un ou de plusieurs
billets de banque.
6. Appareil selon la revendication 4, dans lequel les moyens pour lire les données de
tarif ou de droit de passage se composent d'un système de lecture de ticket, et les
données comprennent un ticket ou une carte codé(e).
7. Appareil selon la revendication 4, construit et agencé de telle sorte que le sujet
reste en possession du ticket ou de la carte en même temps qu'il/elle est lu(e) ou
qu'il/elle est écrit(e).
8. Appareil selon la revendication 4, dans lequel la barrière comprend un ou plusieurs
éléments qui s'étendent dans le passage davantage quand la barrière se trouve dans
l'état fermé que lorsque la barrière se trouve dans l'état ouvert.
9. Appareil selon la revendication 8, dans lequel un ou plusieurs éléments peuvent pivoter
autour d'un axe dans un plan sensiblement parallèle à la direction d'accès.
10. Appareil selon les revendications 4 à 9, dans lequel l'appareil comprend une batterie
pour fournir de l'énergie électrique en cas d'urgence.