Background of the Invention
[0001] The present invention relates to channel drainage systems, and more specifically
to high capacity channels typically referred to as wide channel drainage systems.
Technical Background
[0002] Robust drainage channels with a high hydraulic capacity are required for surface
drainage in large areas such as distribution centres, car parks and airports.
[0003] One such drainage system is provided by Hodkin & Jones Sheffield Ltd and is described
in GB-A-2 229 212. This provides an open channel member made of glass fibre reinforced
concrete, which is anchored into a concrete backfill surrounding the channel in use
by means of a framework of reinforcing bars. This type of channel member is intended
to be used with a separate lid. As described in GB-A-2 316 428 and GB -A-2 347 707
(Hodkin & Jones), the lid provides a number of projections that terminate in slots
extending transverse to the direction of the channel in the surface. Water enters
the channel through these transverse slots. The hydraulic efficiency of wide, transverse
slots in collecting water from the surface is not great. In storm situations the water
may be carried over the slots.
[0004] A number of technical problems are encountered in the installation of such systems.
[0005] With the Hodkin & Jones system, these are created by the need to align the lids on
the channels and ensure that the top of the lid is aligned with the finished surface
level. GB -A- 2 316 428 suggests that by forming the lid and the channel in a single
unit, the problems of locating the lid relative to the channel
in situ are avoided. However, apart from suggesting that the separate concrete lid and channel
are bonded together, there is no teaching of how such a single unit might be achieved.
[0006] This type of drainage channel is intended for use in areas where there is a heavy
surface loading from vehicles. It is therefore necessary to provide for reinforcement
of the concrete slab covering the channel. In the system proposed by Hodkin & Jones
Sheffield Ltd, the slab reinforcement is provided by a specially designed, manufacturer
supplied, reinforcing bar network, which is shaped to co-operate with the projections
in the lid. This is a relatively expensive solution.
[0007] An alternative design of drainage system is described in GB-A- 1 456 021 (Chatham
De Leeuw Ltd ). This describes a pipe that has a series of tubes each arranged to
project upwards from the pipe to a point above the surface level and opening into
the pipe for drainage flow. Material is then laid over the pipe, with the upper ends
of the tubes projecting from the surface. The tubes are moulded with closed ends which
are then cut to expose drainage holes. A commercial system of this general type is
sold by Marshalls Mono Ltd under the registered trade mark PORCUPIPE. This provides
a drainage channel section comprising a longitudinally extending pipe portion and
a plurality of longitudinally spaced hollow projections communicating with the pipe
portion and is the basis of the preamble of the claims. As with the Hodkin & Jones
designs this provides discrete water entry points and provides limited hydraulic efficiency.
However the small projecting tubes present relatively little interference with the
necessary slab reinforcement.
[0008] It is acknowledged that line drainage is more efficient than point drainage arrangements.
Solutions of this type are proposed by Zurn Industries, Inc in US-A- 6 000 881, which
shows a plastics channel section including a narrow throat drain. Protuberances are
provided to secure the channel section into the material in which it is embedded.
Support rods and reinforcing rods can also be fixed to the section.
[0009] A similar metal system is produced by Elkington Gatic and is described further in
GB-A-2 311 549. It provides a slot drain comprising a polygonal channel portion and
a throat portion, the throat portion consisting of two walls extending upwardly from
the channel portion to create a slot drain.
[0010] In both these designs there is improved hydraulic efficiency relative to Hodkin &
Jones or the Chatham De Leeuw point drainage systems. However the slabs of concrete
at either side of the slot are cantilevered out over the channel section and this
results in a significant risk of loading damage in this area, especially in the case
of plastics channel sections that are clearly not capable of bearing any significant
load.
Solution of the Invention
[0011] Accordingly, the present invention provides a drainage channel section comprising
a longitudinally extending pipe portion, a plurality of longitudinally spaced hollow
projections communicating with the pipe portion, characterised in that a longitudinal
channel is supported by and communicates with the projections and defines a continuous
longitudinal slot that lies in use in a surface to be drained.
[0012] Alternatively, the present invention provides a drainage channel section comprising
a longitudinally extending pipe portion, a plurality of longitudinally spaced hollow
projections communicating with the pipe portion, characterised in that a plurality
of longitudinally extending channel sections are supported by and communicate with
the projections in order to define when installed in a surface to be drained a continuous
longitudinal slot that lies in a surface to be drained.
[0013] Supporting a slot drain on a series of projections provides a convenient means of
enabling slab reinforcement to pass between the projections and ensures that a continuous
reinforcement is provided when the channel sections are embedded. This system therefore
has the advantages of high hydraulic capacity and efficiency of the Zurn and Elkington
Gatic systems without creating weakness in the load bearing slab. The system is easy
to install without the alignment problems of Hodkin & Jones two part channels.
[0014] In embodiments where the longitudinal channel has gaps between adjacent sections
or is notched between at least some projections, a reinforcing mesh can be slid through
the channel. This enables the slab covering the channel section to have two dimensional
reinforcement. Where the channel is continuous reinforcing rods are preferably installed
through arched openings defined between the projections.
[0015] Other features and aspects of the invention are defined in the appended claims.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0016] In order that the invention may be well understood, some embodiments thereof will
now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying diagrammatic
drawings, in which:
- Figure 1
- shows a perspective view of a channel section in accordance with the invention;
- Figure 2
- shows a perspective view of a channel section provided with means for creating a lateral
connection and with a fitted metal rail;
- Figure 3
- shows a perspective view of a detail of a longitudinal slot channel and supporting
projections of the channel section of Figure 1 or 2;
- Figure 4
- shows an end view detail of the slot channel and projections of Figure 1 or 2;
- Figure 5
- shows a top plan view of the slot channel and projections of Figure 3;
- Figure 6
- shows a side view of the slot channel and projections of Figure 1 or 2;
- Figure 7
- shows a section through the slot channel and projections shown in Figure 6;
- Figure 8
- shows a perspective view of a second embodiment of a channel section; and
- Figure 9
- shows a perspective view of a second embodiment of a channel section provided with
means for creating a lateral connection.
Description of a Preferred Embodiment
[0017] A high capacity drainage system is intended to be constructed from interconnected
plastics channel sections 2 which are laid out in an appropriate configuration before
being embedded in concrete. The channel sections serve as a liner in use. The load
is borne by a reinforced top slab incorporated during installation of the system.
[0018] Each channel section 2 may be rotationally moulded from medium density polyethylene
(MDPE). Two basic designs of channel section are offered as illustrated in Figures
1 and 2. These may be provided in differing cross sectional sizes depending on the
capacity required. The channel sections are preferably constructed having a mean ovoid
size of 900mm deep by 600mm wide. A smaller system may be provided with a size of
600mm x 400mm. The basic channel section is illustrated in Figure 1 and is preferably
a two metre standard length. Figure 2 shows a one metre back-inlet channel section
variant which has a spigot 4 with three knock-outs enabling connections with a 150mm,
225mm and 300mm diameter plastics, clay and concrete pipes.
[0019] Each channel section 2 comprises a generally ovoid pipe portion 6 having open end
faces 8, 10 so that the sections 2 can be butted together.
[0020] Laterally extending flanges 12 are provided at either side each end face 8 and 10.
These flanges define a level base 14 and are provided with holes 16 so that the channel
sections can be levelled by means of coarsely screwed feet passing through holes 16
to rest on a base of a trench during installation. Ribs 20 are formed around the pipe
portion 6 on its external surface in order to provide greater structural rigidity
to the channel section 2 and to grip the surrounding concrete when the channel section
2 is embedded.
[0021] The female end face 8 is indented to provide a deep groove 60, the male end face
10 has a lip 62 which slots into the groove 60, both end faces 8 and 10 are formed
with double skinned wings 50. The end faces 8 and 10 are further described and claimed
in UK patent application No 0312464.1 filed on 30 May 2003. Other forms of connection
between the sections may be employed.
[0022] The pipe portions 6 will preferably be produced in one and two metre lengths.
[0023] As shown in Figure 1, the longer sections 2 have a longitudinal rib 54 along the
length of the pipe portion 6 positioned approximately 200mm from the invert of the
ovoid channel section 2 in order to increase longitudinal stiffness and to act as
a guide for the level of an initial concrete pour.
[0024] Along the upper surface of the pipe portion 6, there are provided a series of hollow
projections 22 that support a longitudinal slot channel 24 that terminates in an open
slot 26 adapted to be located in a horizontal surface plane in use such that water
entering the slot 26 passes down through the projections 22 into the pipe portion
6.
[0025] Each projection 22 has a base 30 which merges into a wall of the pipe portion 6 as
best illustrated in Figure 3. The base 30 extends circumferentially around the ovoid
pipe portion 6. In a vertical section transverse to the longitudinal direction of
the channel section, the hollow projection 22 extends from its base 30 it tapers towards
the narrower longitudinal channel 24. The channel 24 has side walls 32 that merge
with side walls 34 of each projection.
[0026] The base of the channel 24 is effectively defined by openings into the hollow projections
22 and intermediate arch sections 38 bridging the gaps between adjacent projections.
This configuration directs water flow into the hollow interior of the projections
22.
[0027] Each projection 22 has two parallel transverse faces 40 that each taper from the
base 30 of the projection towards the channel 24. These transverse faces 40 merge
with the arch sections 38 so that in between each pair of projections 22 there is
effectively defined an arched opening 42 as best seen in Figures 6 and 7.
[0028] An identical, but shorter slot channel 24 supported on fewer projections 22 is provided
on the Figure 2 channel section. The shorter Figure 2 section is provided with a spigot
to enable fitting of lateral pipes of various diameters.
[0029] In the longer lengths of pipe section 6 two pairs of rebar supports 56 are disposed
externally either side of the base 30 of the hollow projections 22. These rebar supports
56 ensure that longitudinal reinforcement bars can be fitted parallel to the channel
24 and be located in the correct design location. The rebar supports 56 are positioned
so that rebars held by them are also supported on upper surfaces of the wings 50 and
are therefore retained at the correct level along the length of the channel.
[0030] The slot 26 can also support a rail 58 or metal edge structure, particularly for
airport applications for added security. The rail 58 carries tangs 52 to anchor it
into the surrounding concrete during installation.
[0031] Where the system is intended to be used in a car park with asphalt or block pavior
wearing courses, a heel guard grating structure may be mounted on the slot.
[0032] A ring shaped water seal (not shown) is fitted between end faces 8 and 10 of adjacent
channel sections 2 to form a seal. The water seal is placed in the groove 60 provided
in the female end face 8, the lip 62 on the male end face 10 of an adjacent pipe portion
6 slots into the groove 60 and abuts against the water seal. The seal may be made
of rubber, neoprene or ethylene propylene diene monomer (EPDM) which is highly resistant
to water. The seal is preferably a donut section with a hollow centre to allow easy
compressibility to absorb tolerance variations on length. Alternative sealing means
may be used.
[0033] By moulding the channel section 2 in one piece complete with projections 22 and slot
channel 24, this minimises component count and loose items on site as well as creating
a stiffer integrated monolithic structure. Alignment problems during installation
are also avoided. However, the invention also encompasses a fabricated two part construction
as described below.
Installation
[0034] The wide channel system is generally installed by the method outlined below, although
variations can be made by contractors to suit their particular circumstances.
[0035] The trenches are dug and channel restraining straps are laid in the trench with free
ends left extending over either side. The channels are preferably hung from the top
of the trench by the straps or other supporting arrangements via the metal inlet slot
edge in order that they do not rest on the base of the trench. These straps are plastics
webbing straps that are fitted with buckles to allow them to be fastened around the
channel sections. Alternatively, however, holes 16 are provided through which coarse
screws may passed in order to adjust and level the assembly against the base of the
trenches. Straps are also passed through the arched openings 42 to hold the channel
in position in order to prevent flotation during the final concrete pour. A layer
of base concrete is then laid in the trench to secure the straps. The rib 54 provides
a guide to the depth for this initial concrete pour. Excess concrete poured at this
stage would lead to problems in inserting the reinforcement and/or too much up-thrust
due to excessive buoyancy of the channel produced by the wet concrete during this
first pour. The channel sections 2 are assembled end to end to provide the required
drainage channel configuration and arranged in the trench.
[0036] Reinforcing mesh is then positioned around the channel and loose bars passed through
the openings 42 so that the concrete slab formed over the channel section is continuously
reinforced. A blanking rod is placed in the channel 24 to prevent ingress of wet concrete
into the channel and into the hollow interior of the channel section 2 during installation.
Variations
[0037] A second embodiment of the channel sections 2 of Figures 1 and 2 is shown in Figures
8 and 9. Like reference numerals are used to designate like parts.
[0038] In this variant, the channel 24 is notched at a centre point of each arch section
38 to provide a small gap 46 through which reinforced mesh fabric can be placed down
over the channel section to rest within the arched openings 42. The gaps 46 allow
the mesh to slide through whilst still leaving a continuous slot 26 in the surface
to be drained. This may require placing a blanking rod in the channel 24 during the
final pour to prevent concrete flowing into the channel 24 through the gaps 46. If
the gaps are sufficiently fine so that they can effectively close again once the mesh
has been pushed through, this may not be necessary.
[0039] This second embodiment of the channel section 2 can also be used with loose rod reinforcements
as with the first embodiment. However these may be pushed down through the gaps 46
instead of being slid through the arched openings transverse the longitudinal direction
of the channel section 2.
[0040] In airport installations, it is imperative that there should be no loose components
or fragments of pavements and/or drainage products that could be drawn into aircraft
engines on the surface. Therefore, a galvanised or stainless steel slotted rail 58
as shown in Figure 2 is applied above the plastic slot 26. This rail 58 is fitted
like a saddle over the slot (which may be notched as described above) once the reinforcement
has been put in place and secured using suitable fixings to maintain mechanical alignment.
The rail 58 is slotted to allow fluid access to the projections 22. Alternatively
it may comprise two sections of hot or cold rolled steel angle iron placed back to
back with suitable spacers welded in place to maintain the slot geometry.
[0041] The rail 58 or steel sections may be assembled to the channel section 2 at the factory
so that they butt one another when the sections assembled. To overcome the problem
of alignment for continuity of the slot 26, the rail 58 may be fitted to the assembled
sections on site by means of a suitable clamp mechanism. In this way the rail sections
58 may be longer than the channel sections 2 and will aid proper alignment of the
sections 2.
[0042] Heavy duty concrete anchors are provided at approximately 500 metres centres on the
sides of the angle iron not facing the slot 26 and below the surface. The steel rail
58 or safety edge fabrication may be hot dipped galvanised for corrosion protection.
When the final concrete pour is made the concrete anchors are buried deep into the
concrete haunch to ensure the assembly stays in place at all times. Such a rail 58
or steel edge is better able to withstand the demands placed on the surface where
aircraft towing tractors can achieve wheel loads in excess of 30 tonnes or where jet-blast
may aggravate the paved surface.
[0043] Other fittings or gratings may also be supported on top of the slot as required.
Fabricated Construction
[0044] The embodiments described are moulded of plastics as a one piece unit. It is also
possible to fabricate the sections 2 from upper and lower parts. The lower part may
be any suitable U shaped drainage channel section of polymer concrete, plastics material,
galvanised steel or ceramic construction. The upper part requires the arched inlet
arrangement and is preferably moulded of plastics material with a suitable lower edge
formation to mate with the lower part. Preferably the parts are fabricated together
off-site.
1. A drainage channel section (2) comprising a longitudinally extending pipe portion
(6), a plurality of longitudinally spaced hollow projections (22) communicating with
the pipe portion (6) , characterised in that a longitudinal channel (24) is supported by and communicates with the projections
(22) and defines a longitudinal slot (26) that lies in use in a surface to be drained.
2. A drainage channel section as claimed in claim 1, characterised in that the longitudinal channel (24) is notched between at least some projections (22) to
allow a reinforcing mesh or loose bars to be slid through the channel.
3. A drainage channel section (2) comprising a longitudinally extending pipe portion
(6), a plurality of longitudinally spaced hollow projections (22) communicating with
the pipe portion (6) , characterised in that a plurality of longitudinally extending channel sections (24) are supported by and
communicate with the projections (22) in order to define when installed in a surface
to be drained a continuous longitudinal slot (26) that lies in a surface to be drained.
4. A drainage channel section as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, characterised in that it is moulded of plastics material as a single unit.
5. A drainage channel section as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, characterised in that it is fabricated from upper and lower parts.
6. A drainage channel section as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, characterised in that the hollow projections (22) each have a base (30) which merges with the pipe portion
(6) and extends circumferentially around the pipe portion (6) , each projection (22,
40) tapering towards the supported channel (24).
7. A drainage channel section as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, characterised in that the pipe portion (6) has an ovoid cross section.