[0001] This invention relates to a method of cleaning a hard surface which is subject to
deposition by limescale.
[0002] Bathroom cleaners are mainly acidic compositions, intended to combat calcium deposits.
On the other hand kitchen cleaners are mainly alkaline compositions, intended to combat
grease deposits. However there are situations in which for bathroom cleaning, an alkaline
composition is required; and in which for kitchen cleaning, an acidic cleaning composition
is required. The customer has to decide whether to purchase a plethora of different
products for different cleaning tasks, or whether to compromise. It would be good
to have a single composition which was able to combat the deposits attacked by acidic
cleaning compositions and the deposits attacked by alkaline cleaning compositions,
but the difficulty in achieving this is self-evident.
[0003] The patent document US 4 522 738 also solves the problem of removing scale deposits
on toilet bowls. It discloses toilet bowl cleaners having inner and outer water-soluble
envelopes. The inner envelope contains basic material and the outer envelope contains
acidic material which dissolves first and then the inner envelop. The amounts are
chosen in that way that the pH changes to release carbon dioxide gas, thereby agitate
the bowl water and thus enhance the cleaning process.
[0004] The British patent document GB 2 000 177 discloses compositions for laundry washing
based on an alkali metal carbonate which pH changes from acid to alkaline. There is
no mentioning of removing the limescale on hard surfaces.
[0005] It would also be advantageous to have a cleaning composition which is initially acidic
or alkaline, to effect cleaning, but which does not remain so, in order to prevent
damage to a substrate and, if wished, to effect a second stage of cleaning.
[0006] In accordance with a first aspect of the present invention there is provided a method
of cleaning a hard surface which is subject to deposition by limescale, the method
comprising the application to the hard surface of a cleaning composition which comprises
reactants which undergo a chemical reaction after exposure to the hard surface to
be cleaned, the reaction being such as to produce a delayed change of pH at the hard
surface, the composition being initially an alkaline liquid and after an interval
becomes an acidic liquid effective in combating limescale.
[0007] In accordance with a second aspect of the present invention there is provided a cleaning
composition having the property that on exposure to a hard surface to be cleaned the
locus renders acidic or alkaline or neutral, and that after an interval it renders
the locus alkaline or neutral (if originally acidic) or acidic or neutral (if originally
alkaline) or acidic or alkaline (if originally neutral).
[0008] The composition of any of the aspects may have the property that the hard surface
containing the composition is initially an acidic liquid and after an interval becomes
an alkaline liquid.
[0009] The composition of any of the aspects may have the property that the locus containing
the composition is initially an alkaline liquid and after an interval becomes an acidic
liquid.
[0010] Preferably the pH change of at least 2 pH units takes place after an induction period
(that is, an interval after exposure of the composition to the locus) of at least
10 seconds, more preferably at least 20 seconds, most preferably at least 60 seconds,
and, especially, at least 100 seconds.
[0011] Suitably the said induction period is not more than 12 hours, preferably not more
than 1200 seconds, more preferably not more than 600 seconds, most preferably not
more than 400 seconds, and, especially, not more than 300 seconds.
[0012] A composition of the invention could be a single-pack composition, with the reactants
being held in stasis if necessary. In such embodiments the pH change which takes place
may be initiated by addition of an agent from which the reactants were previously
protected. For example, it could be water, or oxygen, or carbon dioxide, or light.
[0013] Alternatively the reactants could be kept physically separated from each other prior
to their use, as for example in a tablet or dissolvable sachet having two or more
zones, which may be layers, portions or encapsulated sections, depending on the type
of tablet or sachet, or in a twin-bottle package or twin-tablet package. In all such
embodiments the key measure is that the reactants are combined only at the time of
cleaning.
[0014] The composition may be provided in a package which emits the composition as a spray,
mousse, gel or liquid jet. The package may suitably be a trigger spray or, preferably,
an aerosol canister. A spray-emitting package of the composition, especially an aerosol
canister, constitutes a further aspect of the invention. In other embodiments a wipable
product, for example a sponge or cloth, is impregnated with a composition.
[0015] The composition may be a product for dilution in order to be used, or a product in
ready-to-use form. When a product is for dilution, it may be a solid, for example
a powder or tablet, or a liquid, or a gel.
[0016] The composition may be provided in packaging giving unit-dose supply of the composition.
[0017] The composition may be such that the chemical reaction causes a colour change. One
or more of the reactants responsible for the change of pH may cause a change of colour,
for example on exhaustion, or a separate dye or colorant may be included in the composition,
responsive to pH change or to the presence of oxidant species, or reductant species,
or temperature change in the case of an exothermic reaction.
[0018] Other means of indicating chemical change than colour may be employed. For example
the system could be arranged to effervesce when the reaction takes place, for example
by including a bicarbonate in a system which becomes acidic after the induction period.
Another method useful in the case of an exothermic reaction employs a fragrance rendered
volatile by a temperature rise.
[0019] The term "cleaning" as used herein may include: removal of soil deposits: prevention
of soiling; bleaching; combating of allergens; and combating of microbes, including
by one or more of antiseptic, disinfectant, bactericidal, sporicidal, fungicidal and
viricidal action.
[0020] Preferably, the composition is antimicrobial. Preferably an antimicrobial effect
is generated by the reaction, for example by temperature rise when the reaction is
exothermic and/or by the pH change at the locus and/or by production of an antimicrobial
chemical, in the reaction. Preferably an antimicrobial chemical is generated in situ
by the reaction which changes the pH, and therefore with the same delay. The antimicrobial
chemical may, for example, comprise an iodate, bromate, thiocyanate or chlorate.
[0021] The composition preferably produces a bleaching effect. Preferably a bleaching effect
is generated by the reaction, for example by the temperature when the reaction is
exothermic and/or by the pH change at the locus and/or by production of a bleaching
chemical, in the reaction. Preferably a bleaching agent is produced in situ by the
reaction which changes the pH, and therefore with the same delay. For example, the
composition may include sodium chlorite generating, under acid conditions, sodium
hydroxide and chlorine dioxide. Thus, both a bleaching agent and an alkaline agent
may be generated.
[0022] Suitably the composition may contain hydrogen peroxide or a precursor to it as a
bleaching agent and/or reactant.
[0023] The composition may include one or more surfactants. A surfactant used in the present
invention may be selected from one or more surfactants which may be anionic, cationic,
nonionic or amphoteric (zwitterionic) surface active agents.
[0024] One class of nonionic surfactants which may be used in the present invention are
alkoxylated alcohols, particularly alkoxylated fatty alcohols. These include ethoxylated
and propoxylated fatty alcohols, as well as ethoxylated and propoxylated alkyl phenols,
both having alkyl groups of from 7 to 16, more preferably 8 to 13 carbon chains in
length.
[0025] Examples of alkoxylated alcohols include certain ethoxylated alcohol compositions
presently commercially available from the Shell Oil Company (Houston, TX) under the
general trade name NEODOL (trade mark), which are described to be linear alcohol ethoxylates
and certain compositions presently commercially available from the Union Carbide Company,
(Danbury, CT) under the general trade name TERGITOL (trade mark) which are described
to be secondary alcohol ethoxylates.
[0026] Examples of alkoxylated alkyl phenols include certain compositions presently commercially
available from the Rhône-Poulenc Company (Cranbury, NJ) under the general trade name
IGEPAL (trade mark), which are described as octyl and nonyl phenols.
[0027] Another class of non-ionic surfactants that may be used are sorbitan esters of fatty
acids, typically of fatty acids having from 10 to 24 carbon atoms, for example sorbitan
mono oleate.
[0028] Examples of anionic surface active agents which may be used in the present invention
include but are not limited to: alkali metal salts, ammonium salts, amine salts, aminoalcohol
salts or the magnesium salts of one or more of the following compounds: alkyl sulphates,
alkyl ether sulphates, alkylamidoether sulphates, alkylaryl polyether sulphates, monoglyceride
sulphates, alkylsulphonates, alkylamide sulphonates, alkylarylsulphonates, olefinsulphonates,
paraffin sulphonates, alkyl sulfosuccinates, alkyl ether sulfosuccinates, alkylamide
sulfosuccinates, alkyl sulfosuccinamate, alkyl sulfoacetates, alkyl phosphates, alkyl
ether phosphates, acyl saronsinates, acyl isothionates and N-acyl taurates. Generally,
the alkyl or acyl group in these various compounds comprises a carbon chain containing
12 to 20 carbon atoms.
[0029] Other anionic surface active agents which may be used include fatty acid salts, including
salts of oleic, ricinoleic, palmitic and stearic acids; copra oils or hydrogenated
copra oil acid, and acyl lactylates whose acyl group contains 8 to 20 carbon atoms.
[0030] Amphoteric surfactants which may be used in the present invention including amphoteric
betaine surfactant compounds having the following general formula:
wherein R is a hydrophobic group which is an alkyl group containing from 10 to 22
carbon atoms, preferably from 12 to 18 carbon atoms, an alkylaryl or arylalkyl group
containing a similar number of carbon atoms with a benzene ring being treated as equivalent
to about 2 carbon atoms, and similar structures interrupted by amido or either linkages;
each R
1 is an alkyl group containing from 1 to 3 carbon atoms; and R
2 is an alkylene group containing from 1 to 6 carbon atoms.
[0031] One or more such betaine compounds may be included in the compositions of the invention.
[0032] Examples of cationic surfactants which may be used in the present invention include
quaternary ammonium compounds and salts thereof, including quaternary ammonium compounds
which also have germicidal activity and which may be characterized by the general
structural formula:
when at least one of R
1, R
2, R
3 and R
4 is a hydrophobic, aliphatic, aryl aliphatic or aliphatic aryl group containing from
6 to 26 carbon atoms, and the entire cationic portion of the molecule has a molecular
weight of at least 165. The hydrophobic groups may be long-chain alkyl, long-chain
alkoxy aryl, long-chain alkyl aryl, halogen-substituted long-chain alkyl aryl, long-chain
alkyl phenoxy alkyl or aryl alkyl. The remaining groups on the nitrogen atoms, other
than the hydrophobic radicals, are generally hydrocarbon groups usually containing
a total of no more than 12 carbon atoms. R
1, R
2, R
3 and R
4 may be straight chain or may be branched, but are preferably straight chain, and
may include one or more amide or ester linkages. X may be any salt-forming anionic
moiety.
[0033] Examples of quaternary ammonium salts within the above description include the alkyl
ammonium halides such as cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide, alkyl aryl ammonium halides
such as octadecyl dimethyl benzyl ammonium bromide, and N-alkyl pyridinium halides
such as N-cetyl pyridinium bromide. Other suitable types of quaternary ammonium salts
include those in which the molecule contains either amide or ester linkages, such
as octyl phenoxy ethoxy ethyl dimethyl benzyl ammonium chloride and N-(laurylcocoaminoformylmethyl)-pyridinium
chloride. Other effective types of quaternary ammonium compounds which are useful
as germicides includes those in which the hydrophobic moiety is characterized by a
substituted aromatic nucleus as in the case of lauryloxyphenyltrimethyl ammonium chloride,
cetylaminophenyltrimethyl ammonium methosulphate, dodecylphenyltrimethyl ammonium
methosulphate, dodecylphenyltrimethyl ammonium chloride and chlorinated dodecylphenyltrimethyl
ammonium chloride.
[0034] Preferred quaternary ammonium compounds which act as germicides and which are useful
in the present invention include those which have the structural formula:
wherein R
2 and R
3 are the same or different C
8-C
12alkyl, or R
2 is C
12-C
16alkyl, C
8-C
18alkylethoxy, C
8-C
18alkylphenolethoxy and R
3 is benzyl, and X is a halide, for example chloride, bromide or iodide, or methosulphate.
Alkyl groups R
2 and R
3 may be straight chain or branched, but are preferably substantially linear.
[0035] A mixture of two or more surface active agents may also be used. Other known surface
active agents not particularly described above may also be used. Such surface active
agents are described in McCutcheon's Detergents and Emulsifiers, North American Edition,
1982; Kirk-Othmer, Encyclopaedia of Chemical Technology, 3rd Ed., Vol. 22, pp 346-387.
[0036] The compositions of the present invention may include therein one or more organic
solvents, such as lower alkyl alcohols, lower alkyl diols or glycol ethers. Such compounds
may function as a cleaning agent of the compositions, and may be especially useful
in glass cleaners due to their lack of tendency to smear.
[0037] Preferably the composition is such that after exposure to an locus to be cleaned
its temperature rises, preferably caused by the reaction which changes the pH, and
therefore with the same delay. Thus, the reaction responsible for change in pH is
preferably exothermic.
[0038] The composition may be such that after one pH change the pH may change in the reverse
direction. For example a composition may go from acidic to alkaline and back to to
acidic, or from alkaline to acidic and back to alkaline. It is possible that such
compositions may undergo further pH changes. Each pH change preferably takes place
over an induction period as defined above.
[0039] Thus, cleaning compositions based on pH-oscillatory systems may be envisaged. Suitable
systems may include those described in the following references:
Oscillation, Waves and Chaos in Chemical Kinetics, S.K. Scott, Oxford University Press,
1995.
Design of pH-Regulated Oscillators, G. Rabai et al, Acc.Chem.Res.,1990,23,258-263.
A General Model for pH Oscillators, Y. Luo et al, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1991,113,1518-1522.
Temperature compensation in the oscillatory hydrogen peroxide-thiosulfate-sulphite
flow system, G. Rabai et al, Chem. Commun., 1999,1965-1966.
Kinetic Role of CO2 in the Oscillatory H2O2- HSO3- - HCO3- Flow System - G. Rabai et al, J. Phys. Chem. A1999,103, 7224-7229.
Chaotic pH oscillations in hydrogen peroxide-thiosulfate-sulphite flow system, G.
Rabai et al, J. Phys. Chem. A1999,103,7268-7273.
[0040] Thus, preferably the composition may contain components which provide an abrupt pH
step. The autocatalytic species for the reaction is H
+ (or, more rarely, OH
-) and pH steps may occur when a solution of a weak acid is oxidised to provide a strong
acid, so that H
+ concentration increases with the extent of reaction.
[0041] The chemical composition of a typical pH step system will involve an oxidant and
a reductant. Typically, the reductant will be the salt of a weak acid and the corresponding
oxidant will be a strong acid. Of course, a reaction may employ a plurality of oxidants
and/or a plurality of reductants.
[0042] Many different species can be used as partners in these redox systems. In seeking
appropriate species, a useful guide for the overall reaction stoichiometry is that
the reducing agent should release more protons per electron than the oxidising agent
consumes.
[0043] Within the existing literature, the following species can be identified and may be
of use in cleaning compositions:
Potential oxidant:
I peroxo-compounds (eg BrO3-, IO3-, ClO3-, ClO2-, S2O82-, ClO2, H2O2 or a precursor thereof)
II oxidising metal compounds stable in alkaline solutions (eg [Fe(CN)6]3-).
Potential reductant:
I all oxyanions of sulphur that contain S-S bonds (eg S2O32-, S4O62-, S2O42-, S2O62-).
II reducing agents that are significantly more basic than their oxidised counterparts
(eg SO32-, HSO3-, AsO33-, S2O32-, S4O62-, N2H5+, [Fe(CN)6]4-).
[0044] Based on reactions described in the published literature, a matrix of combinations
from some of these species can be constructed:
where "Yes" indicates established evidence for pH step behaviour and "No" indicates
no observed reaction under conditions investigated to date.
[0045] The most widely studied pH step reactions are those typified by the Landolt clock
reaction, in which the oxidant is of formula XO
n- when X is Cl, Br or I and n is 3 when X is Br or I, and 2, 3 or 4 when X is Cl; and
the reductant is SO
32-/HSO
3-. The classic Landolt system employs IO
3- as oxidant and is SO
32-/HSO
3- as reductant. The reaction is autocatalytic in I
- (depending on the second power of the iodide ion concentration) and is a pH step
reaction system even in buffered solution. In unbuffered solution, the reaction is
also autocatalytic in H
+.
[0046] Beyond those combinations mentioned above, there are reports of pH step reactions
with associated pH changes involving the following reagents:
permanganate ion as oxidant with reductant being sulphite, nitrite, selenite, arsenite
thiosulfate + iodide + H2O2 or a precursor thereof.
[0047] Examples of precursors of hydrogen peroxide include urea hydrogen peroxide (UHP)
and a cyclodextrin complexed with an organic peroxy acid, for example as described
in EP-A-895777. An example is β-cyclodextrin complexed with an organic peroxy acid,
e-phthalimido peroxyhexanoic acid (PAP). This product is available under the trade
mark EURECO HC from Wacker Chemie GmbH.
[0048] The addition of a second reductant to a Landolt system ("mixed-Landolt system") may
produce a pH step reaction in which the pH swings from high to low at the end of an
induction period, and then back to high pH on a longer timescale.
[0049] An example of a pH step reaction system starting at low pH and changing to high pH
at the end of an induction period involves the reduction of H
2O
2 (which may be delivered by means of a precursor, as described above) by various multidentate
complexes of Fe (II) or Co (II) ions, notably using Fe(CN)
64- as the anion species, as described in G. Rabai et al, J.Am.Chem.Soc.,
1989, III, p. 3870.
[0050] Cleaning compositions of the invention may be used, for example, for textile materials,
including carpets and clothes. They may be used in dishwasher cleaning compositions
and clothes washing compositions. The change of pH may, for example, initiate the
dissolution of the coating of a washing tablet or of an insert product contained within
a washing tablet, providing in each case delayed release of the contents.
[0051] A preferred cleaning composition of the present invention is a hard surface cleaner,
for cleaning ceramics, glass, stone, plastics and wood; and particularly for cleaning
bathroom and kitchen hard surfaces, for example sinks, bowls, toilets, panels, tiles
and worktops. When acidic it is particularly effective in combating limescale. When
alkaline it is particularly effective in combating grease and proteinaceous deposits.
[0052] Another preferred cleaning composition is adapted for cleaning dentures (normally
of polyacrylic material) and is therefore effective in removing staining and/or plaque.
[0053] Another preferred cleaning composition is adapted for cleaning lavatory bowls and
for this purpose the composition may be packaged in an ITB (In the Bowl) or ITC (In
the Cistern) device, preferably in a holder which hangs from the rim of the bowl or
cistern. In the case of chemical reactants which are desirably kept apart until cleaning
takes place the reactants are preferably liquids kept in separate vessels, or solids
formulated in separate tablets (for example compressed powders or granules, or gel
blocks) or in one tablet with distinct zones for the different reactants. Of course,
in some systems the reactants may be mixed and only react in use, in which case a
single vessel or simple tablet may be used.
[0054] Another useful cleaning composition is adapted to clean marble surfaces effectively.
Such a composition is acidic when applied in order to attack certain stains and soils,
but becomes alkaline before any dissolution of the marble can occur. When alkaline
it attacks other stains and soils, notably greases.
[0055] The invention will now be further described, by way of example, with reference to
the following examples. Unless otherwise stated solutions of the reactants in distilled
water were mixed at ambient temperature and stirred with a magnetic stirrer, whilst
pH and temperature were monitored. Cationic species were sodium ions.
Example 1
[0056] The variations of the induction period (the period between mixing of reactants and
commencement of pH swing) and of pH swing with initial reactant concentrations for
a dilute solution of bromate and sulphite ions, mixed as solutions at ambient temperature,
and using concentrated sulphuric acid to adjust the pH, were determined in a series
of experiments. As can be seen from Table 1 below, the induction period
tind can be varied between 4 hours and 2 minutes, with
tind being approximately inversely proportional to the initial concentrations of both
BrO
3- and H
+ and independent of the initial concentration of SO
32-. The initial sulphite concentration appears to determine the pH swing, which is typically
of the order of 4 to 5 pH units. The reaction occurs for compositions with initial
pH values in the range 6.6 to 8.9.
Table 1
[BrO3-]0 = 0.06 M, [SO32-]0 = 0.054 M |
Initial pH |
Final pH |
pH change |
tind[s] |
8.85 |
3.65 |
5.2 |
14400 |
8.5 |
3.4 |
5.1 |
9000 |
8.2 |
2.9 |
5.3 |
5580 |
8.0 |
2.7 |
5.3 |
4080 |
7.48 |
2.4 |
5.08 |
1320 |
7.18 |
2.25 |
4.93 |
695 |
6.9 |
2.15 |
4.75 |
390 |
6.57 |
2.04 |
4.53 |
140 |
[0057] The initial experiments were repeated varying the initial concentration of bromate
ions in a sequence, with constant initial pH and sulphite concentration. This yielded
the variations in induction period shown in Table 2 below.
Table 2
[BrO3-]0/M |
0.06 |
0.054 |
0.048 |
0.042 |
0.036 |
0.030 |
0.024 |
tind/s |
285 |
350 |
390 |
465 |
470 |
660 |
810 |
[0058] The initial experiments were then repeated with variations in the concentration of
the reductant species sulphite, at constant bromate and initial pH. The effect of
this on the induction period and pH swing is set out in Table 3 below.
Table 3
[SO32-]0 |
tind/s |
Final pH |
0.054 |
300 |
1.95 |
0.0486 |
325 |
1.95 |
0.0432 |
310 |
2.0 |
0.0324 |
290 |
2.0 |
0.027 |
305 |
2.05 |
0.0216 |
305 |
2.1 |
with [BrO
3-]
0 = 0.06 M and an initial pH = 7.0.
[0059] Thus in these experiments induction period and pH swing were relatively insensitive
to [SO
32-]
0.
[0060] Overall, the results showed that the system is of value as the basis for a new cleaning
composition.
Example 2
[0061] A series of experiments were run with substantially higher concentrations of the
reactants than used in Example 1, with the aim of using the concentration dependence
to reduce the induction period whilst maintaining a large pH swing. Also, rather than
adjusting the initial pH with concentrated sulphuric acid after dissolution of the
reactants, the required initial pH was attained by using an appropriate mixture of
sulphite and bisulphite salts. The variations with initial reductant concentrations
of the induction period, final pH and the peak temperature observed during the reaction
are given in Table 4 below. The results showed that the system could provide the basis
of a promising new cleaning composition.
Table 4
[BrO3-]0 /M |
[SO32-]0 /M |
[S2O52-]0 /M |
Initial pH |
tind/s |
Final pH |
Peak temp/°C |
0.27 |
0.516 |
0.018 |
7.9 |
438 |
2.1 |
48 |
0.27 |
0.555 |
0.018 |
7.95 |
432 |
2.1 |
49 |
0.27 |
0.62 |
0.018 |
7.95 |
438 |
2.1 |
56 |
0.27 |
0.674 |
0.018 |
7.95 |
580 |
2.1 |
54 |
0.27 |
0.754 |
0.018 |
8.0 |
77 |
2.4 |
54 |
0.3 |
0.516 |
0.018 |
7.85 |
374 |
2.1 |
46 |
0.3 |
0.555 |
0.018 |
7.95 |
418 |
2.1 |
50 |
0.3 |
0.62 |
0.018 |
7.95 |
358 |
2.2 |
57 |
0.3 |
0.67 |
0.018 |
8.0 |
395 |
2.2 |
58.5 |
0.3 |
0.674 |
0.018 |
8.0 |
395 |
2.2 |
58.5 |
0.3 |
0.754 |
0.018 |
8.05 |
608 |
2.3 |
57 |
0.35 |
0.56 |
0.021 |
7.85 |
238 |
2.05 |
53 |
0.35 |
0.6 |
0.021 |
7.95 |
262 |
2.1 |
54 |
0.35 |
0.63 |
0.021 |
7.9 |
284 |
2.1 |
56 |
0.35 |
0.71 |
0.021 |
8.05 |
314 |
2.2 |
59 |
0.35 |
0.79 |
0.021 |
8.05 |
347 |
2.35 |
61 |
0.35 |
0.875 |
0.021 |
8.05 |
423 |
2.5 |
60 |
0.4 |
1.0 |
0.026 |
8.0 |
227 |
2.5 |
77 |
0.539 |
1.24 |
0.042 |
8.0 |
97 |
2.4 |
93 |
0.539 |
1.24 |
0.036 |
8.2 |
142 |
2.7 |
92 |
0.539 |
1.24 |
0.03 |
8.4 |
178 |
3.0 |
|
0.539 |
1.24 |
0.024 |
8.8 |
532 |
4.0 |
70 |
0.6 |
1.24 |
0.024 |
8.7 |
325 |
3.8 |
78 |
Example 3
[0062] In this example the classic iodate-sulphite/bisulphite Landolt reaction was examined.
The induction period is well known to be inversely proportional to the initial iodate
ion concentration and to be independent of the initial sulphite ion concentration
(provided the initial pH is maintained constant). The dependence of
tind on the initial pH is less well understood, so these data were determined in the present
programme. The solutions were of concentration 0.01M iodate (fixed) and 0.02-0.002M
bisulphite. The results are set out in Table 5 below. In all cases the final pH was
2.2-2.3.
Table 5
pH0 |
6.8 |
7.0 |
7.2 |
7.3 |
7.4 |
7.5 |
7.6 |
7.7 |
7.8 |
7.8 |
tind/s |
27 |
62 |
48 |
78 |
90 |
198 |
220 |
480 |
450 |
600 |
Example 4
[0063] The chlorate ion ClO
3- can also be used as the oxidant in Landolt-type systems. A series of experiments
were performed on this system. The reaction does not appear to occur starting from
pH values higher than ca. 5.0, so the initial pH was adjusted using concentrated H
2SO
4 to the range 4.5-5.0 for the experiments reported below. The reaction is strongly
exothermic and even for relatively dilute solutions, significant temperature rises
(self-heating) occur. The results are set out in Table 6 and 7 below.
Table 6 -
variation of induction period with initial chlorate concentration |
[SO32-]0 = 0.44 M, initial pH = 4.5 |
[ClO3-]0/M |
tind/s |
Final pH |
Peak temperature/°C |
0.29 |
128 |
0.4 |
45.0 |
0.264 |
155 |
0.5 |
43.0 |
0.235 |
177 |
0.7 |
40.5 |
0.206 |
220 |
0.8 |
38.0 |
0.177 |
240 |
1.0 |
35.3 |
0.147 |
260 |
1.1 |
33.0 |
0.118 |
337 |
1.3 |
31.0 |
Table 7 -
dependence on initial sulphite concentration |
[ClO3-]0 = 0.290 M, initial pH = 4.5 |
[SO3-]0/M |
tind/s |
Final pH |
Peak temperature/°C |
0.44 |
128 |
0.4 |
45.0 |
0.409 |
162 |
0.4 |
43.0 |
0.364 |
120 |
0.5 |
41.0 |
0.321 |
110 |
0.5 |
39.5 |
[0064] These data indicate that the induction period is inversely proportional to the initial
chlorate ion concentration and effectively independent of the sulphite concentration.
The peak temperature rise decreases as the system is diluted. The system is of potential
value as a cleaning composition.
Example 5
[0065] A series of experiments were performed in which chlorite ion was added to the bromate-sulphite
reaction system to see if the latter could drive the production of ClO
2 after a suitable induction period. The experimental data set out in Table 8 below
was collected.
Table 8
[BrO3-]0 /M |
[SO32-]0 /M |
[S2O52-]0 /M |
[ClO2-] 0/M |
pH0 |
tind/ s |
Final pH |
Peak temp/ °C |
0.35 |
0.56 |
0.021 |
0.022 |
8.05 |
245 |
2.15 |
51 |
0.35 |
0.56 |
0.021 |
0.055 |
8.05 |
221 |
2.2 |
51 |
0.35 |
0.56 |
0.021 |
0.112 |
8.15 |
260 |
2.7 |
52 |
0.175 |
0.28 |
0.0105 |
0.0275 |
7.95 |
840 |
2.35 |
31 |
0.175 |
0.28 |
0.0105 |
0.0385 |
8.15 |
853 |
2.5 |
34 |
0.175 |
0.28 |
0.0105 |
0.055 |
8.15 |
690 |
2.55 |
33 |
0.175 |
0.28 |
0.0105 |
0.0825 |
8.3 |
865 |
3.05 |
35 |
0.175 |
0.28 |
0.0105 |
0.11 |
8.45 |
1005 |
3.65 |
|
0.175 |
0.28 |
0.0132 |
0.11 |
8.15 |
630 |
2.65 |
38 |
0.175 |
0.28 |
0.0158 |
0.165 |
8.1 |
289 |
3.2 |
|
0.175 |
0.28 |
0.0184 |
0.165 |
7.6 |
50 |
2.7 |
38 |
0.156 |
0.28 |
0.0132 |
0.111 |
7.9 |
475 |
2.6 |
35 |
0.168 |
0.28 |
0.0132 |
0.111 |
8.0 |
348 |
2.5 |
35 |
0.175 |
0.28 |
0.0132 |
0.111 |
8.15 |
330 |
2.65 |
38 |
0.186 |
0.28 |
0.0132 |
0.111 |
8.0 |
333 |
2.6 |
36 |
0.21 |
0.28 |
0.0132 |
0.111 |
8.0 |
300 |
2.6 |
36 |
0.175 |
0.238 |
0.0132 |
0.111 |
7.9 |
225 |
2.6 |
34 |
0.175 |
0.258 |
0.0132 |
0.111 |
7.9 |
278 |
2.5 |
35 |
0.175 |
0.278 |
0.0132 |
0.111 |
8.15 |
330 |
2.65 |
35 |
0.175 |
0.298 |
0.0132 |
0.111 |
8.0 |
405 |
2.6 |
36 |
0.175 |
0.317 |
0.0132 |
0.111 |
8.0 |
557 |
2.7 |
36 |
[0066] These results indicate that the system is reasonably robust to the addition of chlorite
ion. The induction period and pH change is relatively insensitive to the chlorite
ion concentration, although very high concentrations can inhibit the reaction.
[0067] From the drop in pH, it can be expected that the ClO
2- will decompose to ClO
2. This has not been confirmed quantitatively, but the presence of ClO
2 was clearly detectable from its smell after the pH change occurred. Thus the system
is of potential value for a cleaning agent having sterilizing properties.
Example 6
[0068] An experiment was carried out to investigate how mixing bromate and sulphite reactants
in dry powder form affects induction time, temperature rise and pH. The experiment
was carried out for varying sulphite concentration at two initial bromate concentrations
(0.4 and 0.6M).
[0069] The reactants were weighed out in dry powder form so that when mixed with 50ml of
water they would give the desired concentrations. Effervescence was seen when the
water was added. A comparison was made with reactions using liquid reactants. The
results are shown in Table 9 below.
[0070] Table 9 above shows how the induction period changes depending on whether the reactants
are used in solution or dry powder form. The induction period was increased for the
dry powder experiments, but this increase was very small and in most cases only increases
the induction time by a few seconds. There was no noticeable difference in the temperature
rise and initial and final pH between the dry powder and solution experiments. A powder
system was accordingly shown to be of possible value in the present invention.
Example 7
[0071] An experiment was carried out to investigate how using tap water (in the School of
Chemistry, University of Leeds, UK) instead of distilled water affects induction period,
temperature rise and pH, in a sulphite-bromate system. The experiment was carried
out for varying sulphite concentration at two initial bromate concentrations (0.4
and 0.6M) and a constant bisulphite concentration (0.018M). The results are shown
in Table 10 below.
[0072] It can be seen from the above results that using tap water instead of distilled water
had no significant effect on the induction time with the values staying substantially
constant throughout all the experiments. The temperature rise and initial and final
pH were also seen to remain substantially constant.
Example 8
[0073] In a bromate-sulphite system the co-addition of surfactants typically used in household
cleaning compositions was studied. A set of initial concentrations were chosen (bromate
0.5M, sulphite 0.65M and bisulphite 0.018M) and a selection of surfactants were added,
as identified in Table 11 below.
Table 11
Surfactants |
tind |
Max temp (°C) |
Initial pH |
Final pH |
pH swing |
None |
190 |
59.5 |
8.1 |
2.9 |
5.2 |
sodium lauryl sulphate (0.5g) |
252 |
58.5 |
8.1 |
2.9 |
5.2 |
sodium lauryl sulphate (0.2g) |
211 |
58.0 |
8.0 |
2.9 |
5.1 |
Empigen BAC® 50 (1g) |
178 |
59.5 |
8.4 |
3.2 |
5.2 |
Polytergent® SL-62 (1g) |
172 |
59.5 |
8.3 |
3.0 |
5.3 |
Dipropylene glycol ether (1g) |
182 |
59.5 |
8.2 |
3.0 |
5.2 |
[0074] Sodium lauryl sulphate is a well-known anionic surfactant. Polytergent® SL-62 is
a non-ionic surfactant, a mixture of ethoxylated and propoxylated fatty alcohols,
from BASF. The glycol ether was DOWANOL® DPnB glycol ether. Empigen® BAC 50 is a cationic
surfactant, a benzalkonium chloride, more specifically C
10-16 (predominantly C
12-14) alkyl dimethyl benzylammonium chloride.
[0075] It can be seen that with the amounts added none of the surfactants has a large effect
on the induction time. It can be seen that sodium lauryl sulphate does increase the
induction time slightly whereas the Empigen® BAC 50, Polytergent® S162 and glycol
n-butyl ether all slightly decrease the induction time. The temperature rise in all
cases stays constant. The initial pH is slightly raised when Empigen® BAC 50, Polytergent®
SL-62 and glycol n-butyl ether are added but the pH swing stays almost constant.
Example 9
[0076] A further experiment was carried out to determine in greater detail the effects of
adding various surfactants to the bisulphite/sulphite-bromate reaction mixture.
[0077] Two different sets of initial concentrations were used:
i) bromate 0.5M, sulphite 0.65M and bisulphite 0.018M
ii) bromate 0.7M, sulphite 0.5M and bisulphite 0.018M
[0078] A small amount of a common surfactant was added to each experiment in the concentration
ranges shown below:
Empigen® BAC 50: 1% w/w - 5%w/w
Sodium lauryl sulfate: 1% w/w - 5%w/w
Polytergent® SL-62: 1% w/w - 10%w/w
Dipropylene glycol n-butyl ether: 1% w/w - 10%w/w
[0079] Tables 12 and 13 show the results from the experiments In each case the results are
the mean results of three replicates. Table 12 shows the results for the initial concentrations
bromate 0.5M, sulphite 0.65M and bisulphite 0.018M and Table 13 shows the results
for the initial concentrations bromate 0.7M, sulphite 0.5M and bisulphite 0.018M.
[0080] The general conclusion that can be drawn from these more detailed experiments is
that none of the surfactants affect the reaction very much. The most important observations
are that Empigen® BAC 50 seems to decrease the induction time slightly but raises
the initial pH by approximately 0.5 units. The initial pH increases with increasing
Empigen® BAC 50 concentration up to 8.6 (the pH of Empigen® BAC 50). Sodium lauryl
sulphate slightly increases the induction time.
Example 10
[0081] An experiment was conducted to determine whether the dry powder chemicals for the
sulphite-bromate system can be stored together and still react when mixed with water
[0082] The experiments were conducted as outlined previously, but over a period of 30 days.
"Stirred" and "unstirred" variants were carried out. In the "stirred" variants the
reaction mixtures were stirred constantly throughout the reactions. In the "unstirred"
variants the reaction mixtures were stirred vigorously for 15 seconds, then left unstirred
for the rest of the experiments.
[0083] It was noted that towards the latter stages of the experiments, orange specks were
seen in the powder. Also throughout the experiments it was found that the powder set
into a solid lump, which needed to be broken up prior to carrying out the experiments.
The results are shown in Table 14 below.
Table 14
Day |
Stirred |
Unstirred |
|
pHmax |
pHmin |
ΔpH |
tind/10 s |
max T/°C |
pHmax |
pHmin |
ΔpH |
tind/ 10 s |
max T/°C |
1 |
8.05 |
2.9 |
5.15 |
19.4 |
59 |
8.1 |
2.9 |
5.2 |
24 |
61.5 |
2 |
8.05 |
2.85 |
5.2 |
26.1 |
55 |
8 |
2.85 |
5.15 |
28.8 |
58 |
3 |
8 |
2.85 |
5.15 |
17.9 |
59 |
8.05 |
2.9 |
5.15 |
20.2 |
61.5 |
4 |
8.1 |
2.9 |
5.2 |
19.2 |
59 |
8.1 |
2.9 |
5.2 |
19.6 |
62.5 |
5 |
8.1 |
2.9 |
5.2 |
18.6 |
60.5 |
8.1 |
2.9 |
5.2 |
28.6 |
61.5 |
6 |
8.05 |
2.9 |
5.15 |
19.3 |
59 |
8.1 |
2.9 |
5.2 |
20 |
60.5 |
7 |
8.15 |
2.95 |
5.2 |
21.8 |
56 |
8.15 |
2.95 |
5.2 |
35.2 |
58 |
8 |
8.1 |
2.9 |
5.2 |
20.3 |
56 |
8.1 |
2.95 |
5.15 |
22.3 |
58.5 |
10 |
8.15 |
2.95 |
5.2 |
23.2 |
53.5 |
8.05 |
2.9 |
5.15 |
28.4 |
56 |
12 |
8.15 |
2.95 |
5.2 |
24.7 |
52 |
8.1 |
2.95 |
5.15 |
28.7 |
54.5 |
14 |
8.15 |
2.95 |
5.2 |
23 |
53 |
8.1 |
2.95 |
5.15 |
26.2 |
55 |
16 |
8.1 |
2.9 |
5.2 |
23.5 |
52.5 |
8.05 |
2.9 |
5.15 |
24.3 |
57 |
19 |
8.05 |
2.9 |
5.15 |
24 |
51 |
8.1 |
2.9 |
5.2 |
38.6 |
54 |
22 |
8.15 |
2.95 |
5.2 |
22.5 |
52 |
8.1 |
2.9 |
5.2 |
35 |
52 |
26 |
8.1 |
2.9 |
5.2 |
21.3 |
52 |
8.1 |
2.95 |
5.15 |
33.9 |
52 |
30 |
8.15 |
2.9 |
5.25 |
21.4 |
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
[0084] It can be seen from Table 14 that in both the stirred and unstirred experiments the
initial and final pH stayed almost constant with an initial pH of approximately 8.1
and a final pH of approximately 2.9. The maximum temperature rise also stayed approximately
constant at 55°C. The average induction time of the stirred experiments was 216 ±
23.8s but can be seen to vary in the range of 179 - 261s. The induction time in the
unstirred case had an average time of 276 ± 60s but with times varying from 196 -
386s.
Example 11
[0085] Experiments were carried out to investigate a hydrogen peroxide-sulphite/bisulphite
system for suitability for use in the present invention. To deliver hydrogen peroxide
in a stable manner urea hydrogen peroxide (UHP) CO(NH
2)
2H
2O
2 was used. Sodium sulphite was used in the concentration range 1 x 10
-3M to 5 x 10
-3M. UHP was used in the concentration range 1 x 10
-2M to 5 x 10
-2M. The experiments showed that induction period for a pH change event could be 80-2000
seconds, with the lower induction periods being promoted by the more concentrated
UHP solutions. pH typically swung from an initial pH of 7.5-8.4 (higher with increasing
sulphite concentration) to a final pH of 5.1, with UHP concentration having no effect
on initial or final pH, and sulphite concentration having no effect on final pH. It
was concluded that the system had promise as the basis for a cleaning composition.
Example 12
[0086] The compatibility of the UHP-sulphite system described in Example 11 with a number
of surfactants was also investigated. The following surfactants were tested.
Empigen BAC 50: 1% w/w - 5%w/w
Sodium lauryl sulfate: 1% w/w - 5%w/w
Polytergent SL-62: 1% w/w - 10%w/w
Dipropylene glycol n-butyl ether: 1% w/w - 10%w/w
[0087] The reactants and their initial concentrations were as follows.
UHP |
0.3M |
Sulphite |
0.01887M |
Bisulphite |
0.00113M |
[0088] The results are set out in Figures 1 to 4. In these figures the leftmost bar of each
block of results was a control (0% w/w surfactant) and the rightmost bar of each block
of results denotes the highest concentration of surfactant employed.
[0089] The main conclusions are:
- All the surfactants reduced the initial pH by 0.1 - 0.2 units
- Dipropylene glycol n-butyl ether reduced the final pH. All the other surfactants increased
the final pH.
- All surfactants decreased the induction period. In the case of Empigen® BAC 50, the
decrease was significant, lowering the induction time by up to a minute at its lowest
concentration. Dipropylene glycol n-butyl ether decreased the induction period the
least, but still managed to decrease it by 30 seconds at its lowest concentration.
Example 13
[0090] The following samples were tested for antimicrobial properties.
Sample 1 |
Sodium bromate (NaBrO3) - [0.7M]
Sodium sulphite (NaSO3) - [0.5M]
Sodium bisulphite (NaS2O5) - [0.025M] |
Sample 2 |
As Sample 1, but sodium bisulphite concentration 0.018M |
[0091] In the first tests against
S.aureus and
E.coli, testing was undertaken (with Sample 1) using sterile purified water and in the absence
of any organic soil. The second tests (with Sample 2) included two additional test
organisms (
P.aeruginosa and
E.hirae), and were undertaken in hard water (300 ppm CaCO
3) and with the addition of organic soil, bovine serum albumin - BSA.
[0092] The test method for Sample 2 was as follows: 1ml bacterial suspension (10
7 cfu/ml) of the selected bacterium was transferred to a flask containing 1ml of a
3% BSA suspension. The culture/ soil mix was vortex mixed and then shaken on an orbital
shaker for 2 minutes. To the culture/ soil mix was added 8ml sterile hard water. Mixing
was continued for another minute. Without interruption of the shaking, the chemical
compounds of the appropriate samples were added to the flask in powder form, in amounts
calculated to give the molarities mentioned above. 5 minutes after addition of the
sample, shaking was stopped and a 1ml aliquot of the test mixture was transferred
to 9.0ml neutralising medium. After a neutralisation period of 5 minutes, the sample
was serially diluted and used to prepare pour plates which were subsequently incubated
at 36°C for 48 hours before enumerating surviving bacteria. As an inactive control,
testing was repeated without the addition of the test sample. The test method for
Sample 1 was similar but as noted above did not employ hard water or BSA.
[0093] Microbiocidal Effect (ME) values were calculated as follows:
log (cfu/ml in test at t=0) - log (cfu/ml recoverable from test after 5 minute contact
time). The results are shown in Tables 15 and 16 below.
Table 15.
Median ME values (n=3), for S.aureus and E.coli in preliminary tests |
Test organism |
Median ME values |
|
(Sample 1) |
Water (control) |
S.aureus |
>5.7 |
0.1 |
E.coli |
>5.4 |
0.1 |
Table 16.
Median ME values (n=3) from further testing |
Test organism |
Median ME values |
S.aureus |
5.3 |
E.coli |
5.4 |
P.aeruginosa |
>5.2 |
[0094] On the basis of these preliminary results, it appears that exposure of bacteria to
the reactants in a standard suspension test produces considerable reductions in bacterial
viability. Reductions in excess of log 5.0 were achieved for all four test organisms
in the presence of the organic soil bovine serum albumin and hard water, and with
a 5-minute contact time.
[0095] Accordingly, it was concluded that the system showed good activity as an antimicrobial
cleaning composition.
Example 14
[0096] Experiments were carried out on a system postulated to cause an increase in pH, employing
urea hydrogen peroxide and Fe(CN)
64-.
[0097] The experiments assessed the effect of concentration of the species above and of
hydrogen ion concentration.
[0098] Tables 17-19 summarise the results of the experiments. In each case two species were
kept at constant concentrations whilst the third was varied.
[0100] No temperature rise was observed during any of the experiments. A colour change of
colourless to pale yellow was observed. The mean pH increase varied between 3.5 and
4.9 and was often 4.4.
Example 15
[0101] A hard surface cleaning composition has the following composition.
TERGITOL® secondary alcohol |
0.6% w/w |
ethoxylate |
|
Ethylene glycol-n-butyl ether |
|
(non-ionic surfactant) |
|
Fragrance |
0.2% w/w |
Colour |
trace |
H2O2 |
0.1% w/w |
Na2S2O3 |
0.16% w/w |
Na2SO3 |
0.05% w/w |
H2SO4 |
0.005% w/w |
Liquified petroleum gas (propellant) |
20% w/w |
Deionised water |
to 100% w/w |
[0102] During preparation the hydrogen peroxide was kept separate from a solution of the
three sulfur-containing compounds. These input solutions were kept free of air before
mixing and were mixed in the absence of air, and bottled in aerosol cans, free of
air. Only on spraying a surface with this composition, for cleaning, does the pH step
reaction start.
Example 16
[0103] A hard surface cleaner has the following composition:
Ethoxylated fatty alcohol (C12-14;3EO) |
1% w/w |
(non-ionic surfactant) |
|
Ethylene glycol |
5% w/w |
Fragrance |
0.1% w/w |
Colour |
trace |
NaIO4 |
0.43% w/w |
Na2S2O3 |
0.16% w/w |
Na2SO3 |
0.06% w/w |
H2SO4 |
0.01% w/w |
Butane (propellant) |
18% w/w |
Deionised water |
to 100% w/w |
[0104] The components were mixed and loaded into spray canisters with exclusion of air.
Only on spraying a surface with this composition, for cleaning, does the pH step reaction
start.