Field
[0001] The present invention relates to a high strength and high formability steel sheet
               suitable for application to a steel sheet for easy open ends, and a manufacturing
               method thereof.
 
            Background
[0002] Among steel sheets used for beverage cans or food cans, a steel sheet referred to
               as a double reduced (DR) material may be used for lids, bottoms, bodies of three-pieced
               cans, drawn cans, or the like. With the DR material manufactured by a DR method of
               performing cold rolling again after annealing, a sheet thickness can be made thin
               more easily than with a single reduced (SR) material manufactured only by temper rolling
               at a small reduction ratio. Thus, it is possible, using the DR material, to reduce
               costs for manufacturing cans. In the DR method, the cold rolling performed again after
               annealing causes work hardening, and thus although a thin and hard steel sheet can
               be manufactured, its formability is less than an R material.
 
            [0003] As lids of beverage cans and food cans, easy open ends (EOEs) that can be opened
               easily are widely used. In manufacturing an EOE, it is necessary to form, by bulging,
               a rivet for attaching a tab with which a finger is engaged. Steel sheets as materials
               for manufacturing cans are required to have strengths according to sheet thicknesses,
               and as for the DR material, a tensile strength of not lower than about 520 MPa is
               necessary to ensure an economic effect due to thinning thereof. It is difficult to
               ensure for conventional DR materials both of formability and strength as mentioned
               above and thus the SR material has been used for EOEs. However, demands for applying
               the DR material to EOEs also are currently increasing in terms of cost reduction.
 
            [0004] Due to such background, Patent Literature 1 discloses a steel sheet for easy open
               cans lids excellent in rivet formability, characterized in that its carbon content
               is not greater than 0.02% and its boron content is in a range of 0.010 to 0.020%,
               and a manufacturing method thereof, characterized in that second cold rolling is performed
               with a rolling reduction ratio of not greater than 30%. Moreover, Patent Literature
               2 discloses a DR material characterized in that its average Lankford value after an
               aging treatment is not greater than 1.0, and describes that the DR material is excellent
               in EOE rivet formability.
 
            Citation List
Patent Literature
            Summary
Technical Problem
[0006] However, the conventional techniques described above have problems. As a diameter
               of a can lid to be applied becomes greater, a greater strength is required for a steel
               sheet, but since the steel sheet described in Patent Literature 1 has the small carbon
               content, the nitrogen content needs to be large to obtain a large strength. However,
               because the steel sheet contains at least a certain amount of boron, when the nitrogen
               content is large, its ductility at a high temperature becomes small and a slab crack
               is caused upon continuous casting. Therefore, the steel sheet described in Patent
               Literature 1 cannot be applied to an EOE having a large diameter.
 
            [0007] The steel sheet described in Patent Literature 2 achieves the good rivet formability
               by reducing the average Lankford value. However, this method exerts its effects only
               when a rivet is formed by column-like bulging, and when a rivet is formed by sphere-like
               bulging, the rivet formability becomes insufficient. Therefore, provision of a high
               strength and high formability steel sheet having a tensile strength of not lower than
               520 MPa and an Erichsen value of not less than 5.0 mm has been desired.
 
            [0008] The present invention has been made in view of the above problems, and its object
               is to provide a high strength and high formability steel sheet and a manufacturing
               method thereof, which are able to provide a high strength and high formability steel
               sheet having a tensile strength of not lower than 520 MPa and an Erichsen value of
               not less than 5.0 mm.
 
            Solution to Problem
[0009] As a result of diligently performing intensive studies, the inventors of the present
               invention have found that it is effective, for achieving both formability and strength
               of a steel sheet, to ensure strength by increasing a nitrogen content while preventing
               deterioration of formability by restricting a carbon content to an appropriate range,
               and to restrict a second cold rolling reduction ratio after annealing to an appropriate
               range. Moreover, the inventors of the present invention have found that it is necessary
               to restrict also a coiling temperature to an appropriate range because, when the coiling
               temperature after hot rolling is high, precipitated cementite becomes coarse and local
               elongation deteriorates. Furthermore, the inventors of the present invention have
               found that rivet formability by bulging is remarkably improved by providing a resin
               film layer having an appropriate thickness on a side to be an inner surface of a can.
 
            [0010] A high strength and high formability steel sheet according to the present invention
               includes, in mass%: greater than 0.020% and less than 0.040% of C; not less than 0.003%
               and not greater than 0.100% of Si; not less than 0.10% and not greater than 0.60%
               of Mn; not less than 0.001% and not greater than 0.100% of P; not less than 0.001%
               and not greater than 0.020% of S; not less than 0.005% and not greater than 0.100%
               of Al; greater than 0.0130% and not greater than 0.0170% of N; and a remainder being
               Fe and inevitable impurities, wherein the high strength and high formability steel
               sheet has: a resin film layer at least on a side to be an inner surface of a can;
               a tensile strength in a rolling direction of not less than 520 MPa; and an Erichsen
               value of not less than 5.0 mm.
 
            [0011] A thickness of the resin film layer is preferably in a range of 5 to 100 µm.
 
            [0012] A method of manufacturing a high strength and high formability steel sheet according
               to the present invention includes: forming a slab by continuously casting a steel
               including, in mass%: greater than 0.020% and less than 0.040% of C; not less than
               0.003% and not greater than 0.100% of Si; not less than 0.10% and not greater than
               0.60% of Mn; not less than 0.001% and not greater than 0.100% of P; not less than
               0.001% and not greater than 0.020% of S; not less than 0.005% and not greater than
               0.100% of Al; greater than 0.0130% and not greater than 0.0170% of N; and a remainder
               being Fe and inevitable impurities; performing hot rolling at a slab reheating temperature
               of not lower than 1150°C; coiling at a temperature of not higher than 600°C; thereafter
               performing first cold rolling; thereafter performing continuous annealing at a soaking
               temperature of 600 to 700°C for a soaking period of 10 to 50 seconds; thereafter performing
               second cold rolling at a reduction ratio of 8.0 to 15.0%; attaching a resin film at
               least on a side to be an inner surface of a can after forming a surface treatment
               film by an electrolytic process; and manufacturing a steel sheet having a tensile
               strength in a rolling direction of not less than 520 MPa and an Erichsen value of
               not less than 5.0 mm.
 
            Advantageous Effects of Invention
[0013] According to the high strength and high formability steel sheet and the manufacturing
               method thereof of the present invention, it is possible to obtain a high strength
               and high formability steel sheet having a tensile strength of not lower than 520 MPa
               and an Erichsen value of not less than 5.0 mm. Further, as a result, it is possible
               to manufacture a lid with a DR material having a small thickness, without cracking
               upon EOE rivet formation, and thus to achieve thinning of a steel sheet for EOEs to
               a great extent.
 
            Description of Embodiments
[0014] In the following, the present invention is described in detail.
 
            [0015] The high strength and high formability steel sheet of the present invention can be
               applied to a steel sheet for easy open ends having tensile strength of not lower than
               520 MPa and an Erichsen value of not less than 5.0 mm. Such a steel sheet can be manufactured
               with steel having carbon content of less than 0.040%, by setting a coiling temperature
               after hot rolling and a second cold rolling reduction ratio to appropriate conditions,
               and attaching a resin film on a side to become an inner surface of a can. In the following,
               the component composition of the high strength and high formability steel sheet of
               the present invention is described.
 
            Component Composition of High Strength and High Formability Steel Sheet
(1) C: Greater than 0.020% and less than 0.040%
[0016] The high strength and high formability steel sheet of the present invention exerts
               high formability by suppressing carbon (C) content to small. When the C content is
               not less than 0.040%, a steel sheet becomes excessively hard, thus making it impossible
               to manufacture a thin steel sheet by second cold rolling while ensuring formability.
               Thus, the upper limit of C content is set to be less than 0.040%. However, when the
               C content is not greater than 0.020%, the tensile strength of 520 MPa that is required
               to obtain significant economic effects resulted by thinning of a steel sheet cannot
               be obtained. Thus, the lower limit of C content is set to exceed more than 0.020%.
 
            (2) Si: Not less than 0.003% and not greater than 0.100%
[0017] When the silicon (Si) content exceeds 0.100%, there occur problems of deterioration
               of surface treatability, deterioration of corrosion resistance, etc. Thus, the upper
               limit of Si content is 0.100%. When Si content is set to be less than 0.003%, refining
               cost is excessively high. Therefore, the lower limit of Si content is set to be 0.003%.
               The preferable Si content is in a range of not less than 0.003% and not greater than
               0.035%.
 
            (3) Mn: Not less than 0.10% and not greater than 0.60%
[0018] Manganese (Mn) has functions of preventing red shortness during hot rolling due to
               sulfur (S) and of refining crystal grains, and is an element necessary for ensuring
               the desirable quality of a material. The addition of at least 0.10% or more of Mn
               is required in order to exert such effects. However, when an excessive amount of Mn
               is added, the corrosion resistance deteriorates and a steel sheet becomes excessively
               hard. The upper limit of Mn amount is therefore set to be 0.60%. The preferable Mn
               content is in a range of not less than 0.19% and not greater than 0.60%.
 
            (4) P: Not less than 0.001% and not greater than 0.100%
[0019] Phosphorus (P) is a harmful element that hardens steel, and deteriorates formability,
               and in addition, deteriorates also corrosion resistance. Thus, the upper limit of
               P content is set to be 0.100%. However, when the P content is set to be less than
               0.001%, the cost for dephosphorization becomes excessively high. The lower limit of
               P content is therefore set to be 0.001%. The preferable P content is in a range of
               not less than 0.001% and not greater than 0.015%.
 
            (5) S: Not less than 0.001% and not greater than 0.020%
[0020] S exists as inclusions in steel, and is a harmful element causing deterioration of
               formability and deterioration of corrosion resistance. The upper limit of S content
               is therefore set to be 0.020%. When the S content is set to be less than 0.001%, the
               cost for desulfurization becomes excessively high. The lower limit of S content is
               therefore set to be 0.001%. The preferable P content is in a range of not less than
               0.007% and not greater than 0.014%.
 
            (6) Al: Not less than 0.005% and not greater than 0.100%
[0021] Aluminum (Al) is an element necessary as deoxidizer in a steelmaking process. When
               the Al content is small, deoxidation is insufficient, and inclusions increase, thus
               deteriorating formability. When the Al content is not less than 0.005%, it can be
               considered that deoxidation is performed sufficiently. However, when the Al content
               exceeds 0.100%, the frequency of occurrence of surface defects due to alumina clusters,
               etc. is increased. The Al content is therefore set to be not less than 0.005% and
               not greater than 0.100%.
 
            (7) N: Greater than 0.0130% and not greater than 0.0170%
[0022] In the high strength and high formability steel sheet of the present invention, nitrogen
               (N) content is increased, instead of reducing C content, to ensure strength. The strengthening
               using N has small effects on bulging formability, and thus it is possible to strengthen
               a steel sheet without deteriorating an Erichsen value. When N content is not greater
               than 0.0130%, the strength necessary for a can lid cannot be obtained. However, when
               a large amount of N is added, the hot ductility deteriorates, thus causing a slab
               crack in continuous casting. The upper limit of N content is therefore set to be 0.0170%.
 
            (8) Other components
[0023] The balance other than the components described above is iron (Fe) and inevitable
               impurities, and may include component elements normally contained in a known steel
               sheet for welded cans. For example, the component elements such as chromium (Cr):
               not greater than 0.10%, copper (Cu): not greater than 0.20%, nickel (Ni): not greater
               than 0.15%, molybdenum (Mo): not greater than 0.05%, titanium (Ti): not greater than
               0.3%, niobium (Nb): not greater than 0.3%, zirconium (Zr): not greater than 0.3%,
               vanadium (V): not greater than 0.3%, calcium (Ca): not greater than 0.01%, may be
               contained depending on a purpose.
 
            Characteristics of High Strength and High Formability Steel Sheet
[0024] Next, the mechanical characteristics of the high strength and high formability steel
               sheet of the present invention are described.
 
            [0025] The tensile strength of the high strength and high formability steel sheet of the
               present invention is set to be not lower than 520 MPa. When the tensile strength is
               lower than 520 MPa, a steel sheet cannot be made thin enough to obtain significant
               economic effects, in order to ensure the strength of the steel sheet as a material
               for manufacturing lids. The tensile strength is therefore set to be not lower than
               520 MPa. The above tensile strength can be measured by Metallic materials-Tensile
               testing defined in the document "JIS Z 2241".
 
            [0026] The Erichsen value of the high strength and high formability steel sheet of the present
               invention is set to be not less than 5.0 mm. When the Erichsen value is smaller than
               5.0 mm, a crack occurs in rivet formation. The Erichsen value is therefore set to
               be not less than 5.0 mm. The Erichsen value can be measured by Method of Erichsen
               cupping test defined in the document "JIS Z 2247". In the rivet formation, the processing
               form applied on a steel sheet is bulging, which can be regarded as tensile deformation
               toward all directions parallel to a sheet surface. The evaluation of deformability
               of a steel sheet by such processing requires a test by similar bulging, and the deformability
               cannot be evaluated with a total elongation value or a Lankford value by the simple
               uniaxial tensile testing.
 
            Surface Coating of High Strength and High Formability Steel Sheet
[0027] Next, the surface coating of the high strength and high formability steel sheet of
               the present invention is described.
 
            [0028] The rivet formation is performed by bulging, and processing for bulging toward the
               outer side of a can is performed. In the processing, therefore, a steel sheet is deformed
               by a tool contacting with the inner side surface of the can. The lubricating ability
               between a tool and a steel sheet is improved by contacting them with a resin film
               interposed therebetween. Thus, the uniformity of bulging is improved, suppressing
               the occurrence of a crack effectively. It is more preferable that a surface of a steel
               sheet be coated with a resin film in addition to interposing a resin film between
               a tool and a steel sheet, because those contribute to corrosion resistance.
 
            [0029] A resin film is not particularly limited, and various thermoplastic resins and thermosetting
               resins can be used. For example, there may be used an olefin resin film such as of
               polyethylene, polypropylene, ethylenepropylene copolymer, ethylene-vinyl acetate copolymer,
               ethylene-acrylic ester copolymer, and ionomer, or a polyester film such as of polybutylene
               terephthalate, or a thermoplastic resin film including a polyamide film such as of
               nylon 6, nylon 6-6, nylon 11, and nylon 12, a polyvinylchloride film, and a polyvinylidene
               chloride film without stretching them or by stretching them biaxially.
 
            [0030] When an adhesive is used to attach a resin film on a steel sheet, an urethane adhesive,
               an epoxy adhesive, an acid-modified olefin resin adhesive, a copolyamide adhesive,
               a copolyester adhesive (thickness: 0.1 to 5.0 µm), etc. are used preferably. Moreover,
               thermosetting coating is applied on the steel sheet side or the resin film side with
               a thickness in a range of 0.05 to 2.0 µm, and this may be regarded as an adhesive.
               Moreover, thermoplastic or thermosetting coating including modified epoxy coating
               such as of phenol epoxy and amino-epoxy, vinyl chloride-vinyl acetate copolymer, vinyl
               chloride acetate saponified copolymer, vinyl chloride-vinyl acetate-maleic anhydride
               copolymer, epoxy modified-, epoxy amino modified-, epoxy phenol modified-vinyl coating
               or modified vinyl coating, acryl coating, and a synthetic rubber coating such as of
               styrene-butadiene copolymer may be used individually or in combination of two or more
               thereof.
 
            [0031] The thickness of a resin film is preferably set to be in a range of 5 to 100 µm.
               When the thickness of a resin film is smaller than 5 µm, the resin film is fractured
               in bulging, and it is more possible that the effects are not exerted sufficiently.
               When the thickness of a resin film exceeds 100 µm, the effect of increasing a deformation
               amount of a steel sheet becomes greater, and a crack of the steel sheet will occur
               more easily.
 
            Manufacturing Method of High Strength and High Formability Steel Sheet
[0032] Next, the manufacturing method of the high strength and high formability steel sheet
               of the present invention is described.
 
            [0033] The high strength and high formability steel sheet of the present invention is manufactured,
               with use of a steel slab having the above composition manufactured by continuous casting,
               by performing hot rolling at a slab reheating temperature of not lower than 1150°C,
               coiling it at a temperature of not higher than 600°C, performing first cold rolling,
               performing continuous annealing at a soaking temperature of 600 to 700°C for a soaking
               period of 10 to 50 seconds, performing second cold rolling with a reduction ratio
               of 8.0 to 15.0%, forming a surface treatment film by an electrolytic process, and
               then attaching a resin film at least on a side to become an inner surface of a can.
 
            [0034] It is normally difficult, with only one-time cold rolling, to make a sheet thin enough
               to obtain significant economic effects. That is, in order to obtain a thin sheet with
               one-time cold rolling, the load on a mill becomes too high, and it is impossible to
               achieve it depending on a plant capacity. For example, when a final sheet thickness
               is made 0.15 mm, the first cold reduction ratio of as much as 92.5% is required if
               a sheet thickness after hot rolling is 2.0 mm. It can be also considered that a sheet
               is rolled to be thinner than usual at the step of hot rolling to reduce a sheet thickness
               after cold rolling. However, when the reduction ratio in hot rolling is increased,
               the reduction of a temperature of a steel sheet during rolling becomes great, and
               a given finish rolling temperature cannot be obtained. Moreover, when continuous annealing
               is performed, the possibility of the occurrence of troubles such as fracture or deformation
               of a steel sheet during annealing becomes higher if a sheet thickness before annealing
               is set to be small. For these reasons, it is preferable in the present invention that
               the cold rolling for the second time (second cold rolling) be performed after annealing
               to obtain an ultrathin steel sheet.
 
            [0035] When a coiling temperature after hot rolling exceeds 600°C, a pearlite structure
               to be formed becomes coarse, which is a starting point of brittle fracture and thus
               reduces local elongation, making it difficult to obtain an Erichsen value of not less
               than 5.0 mm. The coiling temperature after hot rolling is therefore preferably not
               higher than 600°C, and is more preferably in a range of 550 to 600°C.
 
            [0036] When the soaking temperature of continuous annealing is lower than 600°C or the soaking
               period thereof is shorter than 10 seconds, recrystallization is insufficient, thus
               making it difficult to obtain an Erichsen value of not less than 5.0 mm. However,
               when the soaking temperature exceeds 700°C or the soaking period exceeds 50 seconds,
               the grain growth through recrystallization becomes excessive, thus making it difficult
               to obtain the tensile strength of 520 MPa. The continuous annealing is therefore preferably
               performed under conditions of a soaking temperature of 600 to 700°C and a soaking
               period of 10 to 50 seconds.
 
            [0037] When the second cold rolling reduction ratio exceeds 15.0%, work hardening by the
               second cold rolling becomes excessive, thus making it difficult to obtain an Erichsen
               value of not less than 5.0 mm. The second cold rolling reduction ratio is therefore
               preferably not greater than 15.0%. However, when the second cold rolling reduction
               ratio is less than 8.0%, it is difficult to obtain strength necessary for a can lid.
               Thus, the lower limit of the second cold rolling reduction ratio is preferably 8.0%.
 
            [0038] After the second cold rolling, a surface treatment film is formed by an electrolytic
               process. As a film, a Sn electroplating film, an electrolytic Cr acid treatment film,
               or the like, which is widely used for a can lid as a tin plate or tin-free steel,
               can be applied. The adherence between a resin film and a steel sheet can be improved
               by providing such a film.
 
            [0039] After the surface treatment film is formed, a resin film is attached at least on
               a side to become an inner surface of a can. The attachment method can be a method
               of heating a steel sheet and heat-sealing a resin film, or a method of attaching it
               using an adhesive.
 
            Examples
[0040] A steel slab was obtained by melting steel having the component compositions illustrated
               in Table 1 and the balance including Fe and inevitable impurities in an actual converter
               and subjecting it to continuous casting. The obtained steel slab was heated again,
               and subjected to hot rolling under the conditions illustrated in Table 2. A finish
               rolling temperature of hot rolling was set to be 880°C, and pickling was performed
               after the rolling. Next, after first cold rolling was performed with a reduction ratio
               of 90%, continuous annealing and second cold rolling were performed under the conditions
               illustrated in Table 2. The electrolytic Cr acid treatment was continuously performed
               on the both surfaces of the steel sheet obtained in the above manner, whereby tin-free
               steel having a Cr coating build-up per side of 100 mg/m
2 was obtained. Then, an isophthalic acid copolymerized polyethylene terephthalate
               film having a copolymerization ratio of 12 mol% was laminated on the both surfaces,
               and thus a resin coated steel sheet was obtained. The laminating was performed in
               such a manner that a steel sheet heated to 245°C and a film were nipped by a pair
               of rubber covered rolls so that the film was fused to the metallic sheet, and the
               laminate was cooled with water within one second after it passed the rubber covered
               rolls. Here, a feed rate of the steel sheet was 40 m/min, and the nip length of the
               rubber covered rolls was 17 mm. The nip length is a length in a feed direction of
               a part where the rubber covered rolls and the steel sheet are in contact. The thickness
               of film layers was listed in Table 1.
               
               
Table 1
                  
                     
                        
                           
                           
                           
                           
                           
                           
                           
                           
                           
                        
                        
                           
                              | No. | Component composition (mass%) | Thickness of resin film layer (µm) | 
                           
                              | C | Si | Mn | P | S | Al | N | 
                        
                        
                           
                              | 1 | 0.031 | 0.011 | 0.29 | 0.009 | 0.010 | 0.039 | 0.0153 | 18 | 
                           
                              | 2 | 0.021 | 0.010 | 0.23 | 0.010 | 0.012 | 0.018 | 0.0161 | 24 | 
                           
                              | 3 | 0.039 | 0.012 | 0.25 | 0.009 | 0.010 | 0.025 | 0.0140 | 15 | 
                           
                              | 4 | 0.026 | 0.008 | 0.28 | 0.012 | 0.008 | 0.042 | 0.0170 | 5 | 
                           
                              | 5 | 0.035 | 0.009 | 0.30 | 0.013 | 0.011 | 0.048 | 0.0131 | 51 | 
                           
                              | 6 | 0.029 | 0.010 | 0.19 | 0.010 | 0.012 | 0.041 | 0.0148 | 100 | 
                           
                              | 7 | 0.020 | 0.011 | 0.26 | 0.011 | 0.009 | 0.040 | 0.0152 | 30 | 
                           
                              | 8 | 0.040 | 0.013 | 0.25 | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.051 | 0.0160 | 29 | 
                           
                              | 9 | 0.032 | 0.012 | 0.27 | 0.009 | 0.011 | 0.044 | 0.0130 | 19 | 
                           
                              | 10 | 0.028 | 0.010 | 0.22 | 0.012 | 0.010 | 0.038 | 0.0175 | - | 
                           
                              | 11 | 0.035 | 0.014 | 0.27 | 0.010 | 0.009 | 0.033 | 0.0162 | 20 | 
                           
                              | 12 | 0.029 | 0.011 | 0.25 | 0.011 | 0.012 | 0.054 | 0.0159 | 36 | 
                           
                              | 13 | 0.030 | 0.009 | 0.24 | 0.013 | 0.014 | 0.064 | 0.0141 | 14 | 
                           
                              | 14 | 0.031 | 0.008 | 0.21 | 0.010 | 0.010 | 0.050 | 0.0135 | 27 | 
                           
                              | 15 | 0.022 | 0.010 | 0.30 | 0.012 | 0.011 | 0.042 | 0.0155 | 43 | 
                           
                              | 16 | 0.026 | 0.012 | 0.28 | 0.008 | 0.012 | 0.040 | 0.0152 | 26 | 
                           
                              | 17 | 0.033 | 0.011 | 0.25 | 0.010 | 0.009 | 0.034 | 0.0143 | 39 | 
                           
                              | 18 | 0.037 | 0.010 | 0.31 | 0.011 | 0.010 | 0.032 | 0.0148 | 3 | 
                           
                              | 19 | 0.034 | 0.013 | 0.24 | 0.009 | 0.013 | 0.041 | 0.0151 | 112 | 
                        
                     
                   
                  
                     
                        
                           
                           
                           
                           
                           
                           
                           
                           
                           
                        
                        
                           
                              | *Due to occurrence of slab crack in steel sheet No. 10 in continuous casting, operations
                                 thereafter were not performed. | 
                        
                     
                   
               Table 2
                  
                     
                        
                           
                           
                           
                           
                           
                        
                        
                           
                              | No. | Hot rolling coiling temperature (°C) | Continuous annealing soaking temperature (°C) | Continuous annealing soaking period (second) | Second cold rolling reduction ratio (%) | 
                        
                        
                           
                              | 1 | 582 | 668 | 21 | 11.5 | 
                           
                              | 2 | 589 | 685 | 21 | 9.8 | 
                           
                              | 3 | 575 | 698 | 10 | 8.3 | 
                           
                              | 4 | 598 | 621 | 23 | 10.6 | 
                           
                              | 5 | 552 | 605 | 49 | 14.9 | 
                           
                              | 6 | 563 | 654 | 22 | 12.7 | 
                           
                              | 7 | 584 | 620 | 23 | 13.1 | 
                           
                              | 8 | 571 | 683 | 21 | 11.1 | 
                           
                              | 9 | 591 | 667 | 21 | 10.9 | 
                           
                              | 10 | - | - | - | - | 
                           
                              | 11 | 604 | 644 | 22 | 9.2 | 
                           
                              | 12 | 585 | 598 | 24 | 12.2 | 
                           
                              | 13 | 587 | 703 | 15 | 14.0 | 
                           
                              | 14 | 592 | 683 | 9 | 12.5 | 
                           
                              | 15 | 566 | 672 | 52 | 10.3 | 
                           
                              | 16 | 570 | 658 | 22 | 7.8 | 
                           
                              | 17 | 581 | 631 | 23 | 15.5 | 
                           
                              | 18 | 590 | 689 | 21 | 13.3 | 
                           
                              | 19 | 588 | 690 | 21 | 10.1 | 
                        
                     
                   
                  
                     
                        
                           
                           
                           
                           
                           
                        
                        
                           
                              | *Due to occurrence of slab crack in steel sheet No. 10 in continuous casting, operations
                                 thereafter were not performed. | 
                        
                     
                   
                
            [0041] The resin coated steel sheet obtained as described above was subjected to tensile
               testing. The tensile testing conforms to Metallic materials-Tensile testing defined
               in the document "JIS Z 2241", and strength of tension (tensile strength) was measured
               using a test piece for tensile testing having a size of JIS5. Moreover, the obtained
               resin coated steel sheet was subjected to Erichsen test. The Erichsen test conforms
               to Method of Erichsen cupping test defined in the document "JIS Z 2247", and an Erichsen
               value (a bulging height at which a penetration crack occurred) was measured using
               a test piece of 90 mm x 90 mm. Furthermore, a rivet for attaching an EOE tab was formed
               using the obtained resin coated steel sheet, and the rivet formability was evaluated.
               The rivet formation was performed by three phases of press working, and processing
               for reducing a diameter was performed after bulging to form a spherical-head-formed
               rivet having a diameter of 4.0 mm and a height of 2.5 mm. Occurrence of a crack in
               a rivet portion was evaluated as "C", occurrence of necking in a thickness direction,
               which is a previous stage leading to a crack, was evaluated as "B", and no occurrence
               of a crack or necking in a thickness direction was evaluated as "A". The obtained
               results are listed in Table 3.
               
               
Table 3
                  
                     
                        
                           
                           
                           
                           
                           
                        
                        
                           
                              | No. | Tensile strength (MPa) | Erichsen value (mm) | Rivet formability |  | 
                        
                        
                           
                              | 1 | 552 | 6.9 | A | Inventive Example | 
                           
                              | 2 | 535 | 7.4 | A | Inventive Example | 
                           
                              | 3 | 523 | 7.6 | A | Inventive Example | 
                           
                              | 4 | 539 | 7.0 | A | Inventive Example | 
                           
                              | 5 | 591 | 5.2 | A | Inventive Example | 
                           
                              | 6 | 557 | 6.5 | A | Inventive Example | 
                           
                              | 7 | 516 | 6.2 | A | Comparative Example | 
                           
                              | 8 | 592 | 4.8 | C | Comparative Example | 
                           
                              | 9 | 517 | 7.3 | A | Comparative Example | 
                           
                              | 10 | - | - | - | Comparative Example | 
                           
                              | 11 | 532 | 4.2 | C | Comparative Example | 
                           
                              | 12 | 595 | 4.8 | C | Comparative Example | 
                           
                              | 13 | 512 | 6.1 | A | Comparative Example | 
                           
                              | 14 | 603 | 4.9 | C | Comparative Example | 
                           
                              | 15 | 515 | 7.2 | A | Comparative Example | 
                           
                              | 16 | 517 | 7.9 | A | Comparative Example | 
                           
                              | 17 | 599 | 4.9 | C | Comparative Example | 
                           
                              | 18 | 564 | 6.0 | B | Inventive Examples of Claims 1 and 3 Comparative Example of Claim 2 | 
                           
                              | 19 | 538 | 7.3 | B | Inventive Examples of Claims 1 and 3 Comparative Example of Claim 2 | 
                        
                     
                   
                  
                     
                        
                           
                           
                           
                           
                           
                        
                        
                           
                              | *Due to occurrence of slab crack in steel sheet No. 10 in continuous casting, operations
                                 thereafter were not performed. | 
                        
                     
                   
                
            [0042] As listed in Table 3, the steel sheets of Inventive Examples No. 1 to No. 6 are excellent
               in strength, and achieve tensile strength of not lower than 520 MPa that is required
               as an ultrathin steel sheet for cans. Moreover, they are also excellent in formability,
               and have an Erichsen value of not less than 5.0 mm that is required in EOE processing.
               Furthermore, even if the rivet formation is performed, no crack or necking in a thickness
               direction occurs. By contrast, each of the steel sheets of Comparative Examples No.
               7 and No. 9 has such small C and N content that they are lacking in tensile strength.
               The steel sheet of Comparative Example No. 8 has such large C content that the formability
               is deteriorated by second cold rolling, resulting in the lack in Erichsen value and
               thus causing a crack in rivet formation.
 
            [0043] The steel sheet of Comparative Example No. 10 has such large N content that a slab
               crack has occurred in continuous casting. Regarding the steel sheet of Comparative
               Example No. 11, the local elongation deteriorates because the coiling temperature
               after hot rolling is too high, resulting in the lack in Erichsen value and thus causing
               a crack in rivet formation. Regarding the steel sheet of Comparative Example No. 12,
               recrystallization is insufficient because the soaking temperature in continuous annealing
               is too low, resulting in the lack in Erichsen value and thus causing a crack in rivet
               formation. Regarding the steel sheet of Comparative Example No. 13, grain growth is
               excessive because the soaking temperature in continuous annealing is too high, resulting
               in the lack in tensile strength. Regarding the steel sheet of Comparative Example
               No. 14, recrystallization is insufficient because the soaking period in continuous
               annealing is too short, resulting in the lack in Erichsen value and thus causing a
               crack in rivet formation.
 
            [0044] Regarding the steel sheet of Comparative Example No. 15, grain growth is excessive
               because the soaking period in continuous annealing is too long, resulting in the lack
               in tensile strength. The steel sheet of Comparative Example No. 16 is lacking in tensile
               strength because the second cold rolling reduction ratio is too small. Regarding the
               steel sheet of Comparative Example No. 17, work hardening becomes excessive because
               the second cold rolling reduction ratio is too high, resulting in the lack in Erichsen
               value and thus causing a crack in rivet formation. Regarding the steel sheet of No.
               18 that is Inventive Example of claims 1 and 3 and is Comparative Example of claim
               2, the thickness of the resin film coating the surface of the steel sheet is too thin,
               and thus the effects thereof are not sufficiently exerted in rivet formation, causing
               a necking crack in a thickness direction before leading to a crack. Regarding the
               steel sheet of No. 19 that is Inventive Example of claims 1 and 3 and is Comparative
               Example of claim 2, the thickness of the resin film coating the surface of the steel
               sheet is too thick, and thus the deformation amount of the steel sheet is increased
               in rivet formation, causing a necking crack in a thickness direction before leading
               to a crack.
 
            [0045] Based on the above, it was confirmed that according to the steel sheets of the inventive
               examples, it is possible to obtain a high strength and high formability steel sheet
               having tensile strength of not lower than 520 MPa and an Erichsen value of not less
               than 5.0 mm.
 
            [0046] The embodiments to which the present invention made by the inventors are applied
               have been described. However, the present invention is not limited by the description
               and the drawings that form a part of the disclosure of the present invention in the
               embodiments. That is, other embodiments, examples, and operation technologies that
               are made based on the present embodiments by a person skilled in the art, etc. are
               all included in the scope of the present invention.
 
            Industrial Applicability
[0047] According to the present invention, it is possible to provide a high strength and
               high formability steel sheet having tensile strength of not lower than 520 MPa and
               an Erichsen value of not less than 5.0 mm.