(19)
(11) EP 2 873 585 B1

(12) EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION

(45) Mention of the grant of the patent:
25.05.2016 Bulletin 2016/21

(21) Application number: 13193300.4

(22) Date of filing: 18.11.2013
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC): 
B61L 3/12(2006.01)
B61L 25/02(2006.01)
B61L 27/00(2006.01)

(54)

A method and a system for monitoring the operability of a balise

Verfahren und System zur Überwachung der Bedienbarkeit einer Balise

Procédé et système pour superviser l'exploitabilité d'une balise


(84) Designated Contracting States:
AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

(43) Date of publication of application:
20.05.2015 Bulletin 2015/21

(73) Proprietor: Bombardier Transportation GmbH
10785 Berlin (DE)

(72) Inventors:
  • Täng, Fredrik
    18356 Täby (SE)
  • Jonsson, Lars
    16246 Vällingby (SE)
  • Ranta-Eskola, Harri
    75230 Uppsala (SE)

(74) Representative: Patentanwälte Bressel und Partner mbB 
Potsdamer Platz 10
10785 Berlin
10785 Berlin (DE)


(56) References cited: : 
WO-A1-2007/113128
   
  • "ERTMS/ETCS FFFIS for Eurobalise", , 24 February 2012 (2012-02-24), pages 1-157, XP055112059, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://www.era.europa.eu/Document-Regi ster/Documents/Set-2-Index009-SUBSET-036 v300.pdf [retrieved on 2014-04-03]
   
Note: Within nine months from the publication of the mention of the grant of the European patent, any person may give notice to the European Patent Office of opposition to the European patent granted. Notice of opposition shall be filed in a written reasoned statement. It shall not be deemed to have been filed until the opposition fee has been paid. (Art. 99(1) European Patent Convention).


Description


[0001] The invention relates to a method and a system for monitoring the operability of a balise for transmitting information to a rail vehicle.

[0002] It is known that an interlocking computer or control unit controls and monitors various devices along a railway line in modern railway signalling systems. Among the most important wayside objects are point machines and lamp signals. Traditionally, lamp signals have been monitored by the interlocking control unit by measuring the current which flows through the lamp and checking if said current is within predetermined limits. If the lamp fails, the failure will affect the current and can thus be detected by the interlocking control unit which, in turn, generates an alarm signal. Similarly, the current deliverance to a point machine can be measured and monitored and the status of the point machine can be monitored depending on said current. Should the point machine fail, the failure will be detected when the point machine is ordered to reverse and an alarm signal can be generated.

[0003] Track-sided transmitters, which can be also referred to as balises, which are used to send information to passing trains, cannot be monitored in this way. If, for instance, a cable connecting the balise and a balise-related control unit breaks, the failure is not automatically detected by the control unit. Similarly, if the balise should fail or be ripped off its sleeper, the control unit will not detect it. Furthermore, cable breakage or failure of the balise will result in restrictive action by the rail vehicles but it is not always clear that something is broken or missing. The driver of the rail vehicle is supposed to report failures of the balise but such reports are usually irregular.

[0004] The document DE 10 2009 012 986 A1 describes a method for operating a system for controlling a rail vehicle. A track-sided electronic control unit selects a data signal depending on a signal term and transmits said signal to a balise which is arranged on a track. Furthermore, the balise receives an activation signal which is sent by a vehicle-sided antenna. During reception of the activation signal, a request signal is transmitted to the electronic control unit. The data signal is transmitted from the track-sided control unit to the balise during the time interval of reception of the request signal.

[0005] The communication disclosed in DE 10 2009 012 986 A1 is, however, not compatible with the European Standard ERTMS/ECTS Class 1 FFFIS for Eurobalise, SUBSET-036. Said standard standardises a balise-based ATP-telegram (automatic train protection telegram) transmission between way-sided elements and train-sided elements and serves as a starting point for this invention.

[0006] The document "ERTMS/ETCS FFFIS for Eurobalise, 24 February 2012 (2012-02-24), pages 1-157, XP055112059, retrieved from internet, URL:

http//www.era.europa.eu/Document-Register/Documents/Set-2-Index009-SUBSET-036 v300.pdf" constitute the mandatory requirements for achieving air-gap interoperability between any possible combination of wayside and train-borne equipment. Annexes designated as "informative", either provide background information for the mandatory requirements, or outline non-mandatory requirements and optional functionality.



[0007] WO 2007/113128 A1 relates to a method for operating a train control device and to a corresponding train control device comprising line-sided transponders which transmit information, which is stored therein, to the traction vehicle when driven over by a traction vehicle and the positions of the transponders are stored on the traction-vehicle side. In order to rapidly correct errors in the event of information not being transmitted or erroneously transmitted information via a transponder, an identification code assigned to said transponder is routed by means of a communication device of the traction vehicle to a control centre responsible for the navigated railway section.

[0008] There is the technical problem to provide a system and a method for monitoring the operability of a balise for transmitting information to a rail vehicle, wherein a fast, reliable and robust monitoring of a balise, e.g. of an incorrect or a correct operation and/or an incorrect or correct connection, is provided.

[0009] The solution to said technical problem is provided by the subject matter according to claims 1 and 7.

[0010] It is a main idea of the invention to monitor the operability of the balise depending on the telegram switch inhibit signal which is generated by the balise and transmitted to the balise-related control unit.

[0011] A method for monitoring the operability of a balise for transmitting information to a rail vehicle is proposed. Monitoring the operability comprises to monitor a correct or incorrect operation or operability of the balise. Monitoring the operability can also comprises to monitor a correct or incorrect connection of the balise to e.g. a balise-related control unit. Thus, a balise-related fault detection can be provided by the proposed method.

[0012] In the context of this invention, the term "balise" refers to any type of track-sided transmitter. The balise is usually arranged on a track for a rail vehicle. The balise is capable of transmitting information, e.g. in form of one or more data signals, to the rail vehicle traveling on the track.

[0013] A data signal can be generated by a balise-related control unit which is connected to balise. The data signal can contain information on e.g. a maximal admissible velocity and/or a position of the balise and/or a position of the next balise along the track. These pieces of information can be transmitted from the balise to the rail vehicle and can be evaluated by a vehicle-sided control unit, e.g. in order to control certain operations on the rail vehicle. The data signal can be generated in form of a data telegram, in particular in the form of the aforementioned ATP-telegram.

[0014] It is possible that data signals, e.g. data telegrams, are generated continuously and transmitted to the balise with no interruptions, wherein the balise-related control unit transmits the data signal continuously, regardless of whether there is a rail vehicle passing the balise or not. In this context, passing can mean that the rail vehicle is or arrives at a position at which the information transmitted by the balise can be received by the rail vehicle or that the rail vehicle is or arrives at a position at which a tele-powering signal, which will be explained in the following, transmitted by the rail vehicle can be received by the balise.

[0015] Further, the tele-powering signal emitted by the rail vehicle, e.g. by a vehicle-sided antenna, is received by the balise. In order to receive said tele-powering signal, the balise can comprise at least one corresponding receiving means. Upon reception of the tele-powering signal, a telegram switch inhibit signal is generated by the balise and transmitted to the balise-related control unit. The telegram switch inhibit signal can be used for inhibiting switching of the data signal, in particular the data telegram, in the balise-related control unit during a passage of the balise, e.g. by the rail vehicle.

[0016] The balise-related control unit denotes a unit which controls an operation of the balise. The tele-powering signal can be also referred to as activation signal.

[0017] In order to generate the telegram switch inhibit signal, the balise can comprise corresponding generating means. The balise can be connected to the balise-related control unit in a wireless or tethered way.

[0018] After having received the telegram switch inhibit signal, the balise-related control unit can suspend a change of current the data signal, in particular a change of the data telegram, for a predetermined amount of time. The amount of time can be chosen such that no change of the data signal occurs during the actual balise passage. This is called back-signalling. This back-signalling ensures that a rail vehicle does not only receive the end of one data signal, in particular data signal in form of a data frame or telegram, and the beginning of another data signal.

[0019] According to the invention, the operability of the balise is monitored depending on the telegram switch inhibit signal, in particular characteristics or properties of the telegram switch inhibit signal.

[0020] For example, the operability of the balise can be monitored depending on whether a telegram switch inhibit signal is received by the balise-related control unit, in particular at an expected time instant of reception or within a certain expected time interval of reception.

[0021] Also, in particular if a telegram switch inhibit signal has been received by the balise-related control unit, the operability of the balise can be monitored depending on the time instant of reception of the telegram switch inhibit signal, in particular depending on the difference between the time instant of reception and an expected time instant of reception. In other words, an expected time instant or an expected time interval of reception of the telegram switch inhibit signal by the balise-related control unit is determined, wherein the operability of the balise can be monitored depending on whether a telegram switch inhibit signal is received by the balise-related control unit at the expected time instant or within the expected time interval.

[0022] Alternatively or cumulatively, the operability can be monitored depending on data content and/or a telegram switch inhibit signal format and/or other properties or characteristics of the telegram switch inhibit signal.

[0023] An incorrect operation or connection can e.g. be detected if at least one property or characteristic of the telegram switch inhibit signal, in particular of the previously described properties or characteristics, does not match a predetermined characteristic or property or differs from predetermined characteristic or property more than a predetermined threshold value. An incorrect operation or connection can e.g. be detected if no telegram switch inhibit signal is received by the balise-related control unit at the expected time instant or within the expected time interval. A correct operation or connection can e.g. be detected if a telegram switch inhibit signal is received by the balise-related control unit at the expected time instant or within the expected time interval.

[0024] The proposed method advantageously allows monitoring the operability of the balise based on existing signals generated during operation of the balise. This, in turn, means that no additional equipment has to be installed. Further, the proposed method allows a fast and reliable monitoring as the telegram switch inhibit signal can be analyzed easily. Another advantage is that the proposed method can be used as an add-on to the European Standard ERTMS/ECTS Class 1 FFFIS for Eurobalise, SUBSET-036 as it is compatible with said standard. In particular, no changes of the standard or the communication interfaces of the balise and the balise-related control unit are required.

[0025] Further, position information of rail vehicles are determined. Position information can e.g. comprise position coordinates of the rail vehicle, in particular along the track, and a time instant corresponding to a position of the rail vehicle. It is possible that the position and a corresponding time instant is measured and saved during the travel of the rail vehicle along the track. This can be done continuously or sequentially. To determine position information, a means for determining position information can be used, e.g. a GNSS-based system or any other position detection system. Said embodiment, however, may require a rail vehicle which comprises an equipment for transmitting information, e.g. in the form of ATP telegrams, to the wayside, e.g. to the balise. Of course, such an equipment also needs to be activated. Further, information on a travel speed of the rail vehicle can be determined, e.g. by a speed sensor, and, if applicable, transmitted to the wayside. Said travel speed information can be used to determine an expected position or expected position interval which was or is reached in or after a given time interval or to determine an expected time or an expected time interval which was or is needed to reach a given position.

[0026] The position information is compared to balise-related rail vehicle passage information. Said passage information can e.g. comprise a time instant at which the rail vehicle passes the balise. The vehicle passage information can also contain a position of the balise, e.g. in form of coordinates.

[0027] The operability of the balise is monitored depending on the comparison of the position information and the balise-related rail vehicle passage information. In particular, the operability can be monitored depending on the comparison of said pieces of information at a certain time instant, in particular time instant at which the vehicle passes the balise. It is, for example, possible that an expected time instant or expected time interval of a passage of the rail vehicle of the balise is determined based on the position information and compared to an actual time instant of reception of the telegram switch inhibit signal. This will be explained later.

[0028] The time instant at which the vehicle passes the balise can e.g. be defined as the time instant of reception of the telegram switch inhibit signal by the balise-related control unit. Thus, it is not mandatory that the rail vehicle or at least a part of the rail vehicle has already passed the balise.

[0029] The comparison can e.g. be performed by a correlation of said signals. It is possible, that a similarity measure of said pieces of information is determined or calculated. The similarity measure can e.g. be determined depending on a difference between the time instant of the passage of the rail vehicle of balise and the expected time instant at which the rail vehicle reaches the position of the balise which is determined based on the aforementioned position information. The similarity measure can e.g. increase with a decreasing difference. A correct operability can e.g. be detected, if the similarity measure is higher than e.g. a predetermined threshold value. In turn, an incorrect operability of the balise can be detected if the similarity measure is equal to or smaller than the threshold value.

[0030] The position information is determined independently of the determination of the vehicle passage information. This can e.g. mean that different means, e.g. sensors, are used to determine the position information (or at least a part of these information) and the vehicle passage information.

[0031] By comparing position information of the rail vehicle and vehicle passage information, a simple but robust and reliable method for monitoring the operability is provided.

[0032] Further, an expected time instant or an expected time interval of a rail vehicle passage of the balise is determined depending on the position information of the rail vehicle and the position of the balise. The expected time instant or expected time interval denotes a time instant or time interval at which or in which a vehicle passage of the balise was or is expected. The expected time instant or expected time interval can thus lie in the past or in the future.

[0033] The position of the balise can be known beforehand. Depending on said known position and position information, the time instant or the time interval at/in which the rail vehicle has passed or will pass the position of a balise can be determined. It is also possible to predict said time instant or time interval, e.g. based on a current rail vehicle position and a velocity or travel speed of the rail vehicle.

[0034] The expected time instant or expected time interval of the rail vehicle passage is compared to a detected time instant of a rail vehicle passage of the balise unit. The detected time instant is determined depending on the reception of the telegram switch inhibit signal by the balise-related control unit. The operability of the balise is monitored depending on the comparison of the expected time instant or expected time interval of the expected rail vehicle passage and the detected time instant of a rail vehicle passage of the balise unit. Comparison can e.g. be performed by calculating a difference between the said time instances or a difference between the detected time instant and limits or a central value of the expected time interval. If the difference is higher than predetermined threshold value, an incorrect operability can be detected. If the difference is smaller than or equal to the threshold value, a correct operability can be detected.

[0035] This provides a simple but robust method of monitoring the operability.

[0036] In another embodiment, the position information of the rail vehicle is determined depending on the output signal of at least one track circuit. The track circuit denotes an electrical device which can be used to detect the absence of a rail vehicle on the track. If a rail vehicle is present, an electric connection between two rails of the track is provided by the wheels and an axle of e.g. locomotives and/or rolling stocks, wherein the track circuit is shortened. If said rail vehicle is absent, the electrical circuit is consequently interrupted. By monitoring the track-circuit, e.g. a current flow through the track circuit, the absence or presence of a rail vehicle can be detected.

[0037] This advantageously allows a simple determination of the absence or presence of a rail vehicle. If a position of the track circuit is known, position information of the rail vehicle can be determined based on monitoring the track circuit.

[0038] In an alternative embodiment, the position information of the rail vehicle is determined depending on the output signal of at least one axle counter. An axle counter denotes a device on a track that detects the passing of a rail vehicle. As each axle of a rail vehicle passes a head or counting head of the axle counter, the counter increments. If a position of the axle counter is known, position information can be simply determined by the axle counter.

[0039] This advantageously allows determination of position information by usually existing equipment.

[0040] In a preferred embodiment, the position information is correlated to the balise-related rail vehicle passage information. As explained later, it is for instance possible to determine an expected time course of a vehicle passage information based on the position information. Said determined time course can be correlated to a time course of the rail vehicle passage information.

[0041] The time course can e.g. be a binary time course, wherein a function takes a first value at the time instant at which the rail vehicle passes the balise and another value at all remaining time instances.

[0042] A correlation advantageously allows a simple determination of a similarity measure which is, furthermore, reliable. This, in turn, allows a more reliable monitoring of the operability. Further described is that a rail vehicle passage of the balise is detected depending on the reception of the telegram switch inhibit signal by the balise-related control unit. Furthermore, an expected position or expected position interval of the rail vehicle is determined based on the rail vehicle positioning information and the time instant of the detected rail vehicle passage. It is for instance possible, to determine the position at which the rail vehicle was located or will be located at the time instant of the rail vehicle passage of the balise.

[0043] The operability of the balise is monitored depending on the comparison of the position of the balise and the expected position or expected position interval of the rail vehicle. Comparison can e.g. be performed by calculating a difference between the position of the balise and the expected position or a difference between the position of a balise and limits or a central value of the position interval of the rail vehicle. If the difference is higher than the threshold value, an incorrect operability of the balise can be detected. If the difference is smaller than or equal to the threshold value, a correct operability of the balise can be detected.

[0044] This advantageously provides an alternative method for fast and robust monitoring of the operability of the balise.

[0045] In another embodiment, the operability of the balise is monitored by an interlocking control unit. It is possible that balise-related control unit is connected to the interlocking control unit, e.g. in a tethered or wireless way. The interlocking control unit can e.g. control an operation of other railway-related systems, in particular an operation of at least one signalling means such as lamp signals and/or an operation of at least one controlling means such as a point machine.

[0046] Furthermore, the previously described means for determining position information of the rail vehicle, in particular the previously described track circuit and/or axle counters, can be connected to the interlocking control unit. Thus, the interlocking control unit can perform the previously described comparison.

[0047] In another embodiment, an alarm signal is generated if at least one criterion for a correct operability of the balise is not met. This means that in case an incorrect operability is detected, an alarm signal such as an acoustic, optic or haptic alarm signal can be generated.

[0048] Further proposed is a system for monitoring the operability of a balise for transmitting information to a rail vehicle. The system comprises at least one balise and a balise-related control unit. The balise and the balise-related control unit can be connected in order to transmit information, e.g. in form of data signals or data frames.

[0049] A tele-powering signal emitted by the rail vehicle is receivable by the balise. A telegram switch inhibit signal is generatable by the balise and transmittable to the balise-related control unit upon reception of the tele-powering signal.

[0050] According to the invention, the system comprises at least one monitoring means, wherein the operability of the balise is monitorable by the at least one monitoring means depending on the telegram switch inhibit signal. The monitoring means can e.g. be integrated into the balise-related control unit. Preferably, the monitoring means are integrated in an interlocking control unit, which will be explained later.

[0051] The proposed system advantageously allows performing one of the previously described methods.

[0052] Further, position information of the rail vehicle is determinable, wherein the position information is comparable to balise-related rail vehicle passage information, wherein the operability of the balise is monitorable depending on the comparison of the position information and the balise-related rail vehicle passage information. An expected time instant or an expected time interval of a rail vehicle passage of the balise is determinable depending on the position information of the rail vehicle and the position of the balise, wherein the expected time instant or expected time interval of the rail vehicle passage is comparable to a detected time instant of a rail vehicle passage of the balise unit, wherein the detected time instant is determinable depending on the reception of the telegram switch inhibit signal (RS) by the balise-related control unit, wherein the operability of the balise is monitorable depending on the comparison of the expected time instant or expected time interval of the expected rail vehicle passage and the detected time instant of the rail vehicle passage of the balise.

[0053] In a preferred embodiment, the system comprises at least one means for determining vehicle position information.

[0054] In a further preferred embodiment, the at least one means for determining vehicle position information is provided by a track circuit or an axle counter.

[0055] In another embodiment, the system comprises an interlocking control unit, wherein the operability of the balise is monitorable by the interlocking control unit. The interlocking control unit can be connected to the previously described balise-related control unit. The interlocking control unit hereby denotes a central control unit which, as explained previously, also controls operation of other railway-related devices or systems.

[0056] In another embodiment, the balise is connected to the balise-related control unit by a cable. In this embodiment, a correct or incorrect operability of the cable can also be monitored.

[0057] The invention will be described with reference to the attached figure.

[0058] Fig. 1 shows a schematic block diagram of a system 1 for monitoring the operability of a balise 2. The system comprises the balise 2 and a balise-related control unit 3. The balise-related control unit 3 and the balise 2 are connected by a cable 4. Furthermore, the system 1 comprises a central interlocking control unit 5 and a first track circuit 6a and another track circuit 6b. The track circuits 6a, 6b are arranged with a predetermined distance to each other along a track 8 at predetermined positions. It is shown that the balise 2 is arranged in between the track circuits 6a, 6b along a direction of travel.

[0059] A rail vehicle 7 travels along the track 8. Rail vehicle 7 comprises an antenna 9 for transmitting a tele-powering signal 10. The tele-powering signal 10 is received by the balise 2. A telegram switch inhibit signal RS is generated by the balise 2 and transmitted to the balise-related control unit 3 via the cable 4. The balise-related control unit 3 generates data signals DS and transmits these data signals DS to the balise 2 which, in turn, transmits these data signals DS to the rail vehicle 7.

[0060] By monitoring a circuit (not shown) of the track circuits 6a, 6b, a position of the rail vehicle 7 can be determined. The position of the track circuits 6a, 6b and the balise 2 is known. Upon reception of the telegram switch inhibit signal RS by the balise-related control unit 3, a vehicle passage of the balise 2 is detected. The corresponding time instant is determined and saved by the interlocking control unit 5. Also, time instants of the passage of the rail vehicle 7 of the first track circuit 6a and the second track circuit 6b are determined and saved.

[0061] After the rail vehicle 7 has passed the second track circuit 6b, which is arranged behind the balise 2 and the first track circuit 6a along the direction of travel of the rail vehicle 7, the detected time instant of the rail vehicle passage of the balise 2 is compared to a expected time interval, wherein limits of the time interval are provided by the time instants of the passages of the rail vehicle 7 of the first and the second track circuits 6a, 6b. If the expected time instant of the rail vehicle passage of the balise 2 lies within the time interval, a correct operation of the balise 2 can be detected. Alternatively, a correct operation can be detected, if the expected time instant of the rail vehicle passage of the balise 2 corresponds to the central time instant of the time interval or differs not more than a predetermined amount from said central time instant. In all other cases, an incorrect operability of the track sided transmitter 2 can be detected. In this case, the interlocking unit 5 can generate an alarm signal and, if applicable, activate a fail safe operation of selected or all other systems or devices controlled by the interlocking control unit 5.


Claims

1. A method for monitoring the operability of a balise (2) for transmitting information to a rail vehicle (7), wherein a tele-powering signal (10) emitted by the rail vehicle (7) is received by the balise (2),
wherein a telegram switch inhibit signal (RS) is generated by the balise (2) and transmitted to a balise-related control unit (3) upon reception of the tele-powering signal (10),
characterized in that
the operability of the balise (2) is monitored depending on the telegram switch inhibit signal (RS), wherein a position information of the rail vehicle (7) is determined, wherein the position information is compared to balise-related rail vehicle passage information, wherein the operability of the balise (2) is monitored depending on the comparison of the position information and the balise-related rail vehicle passage information, wherein an expected time instant or an expected time interval of a rail vehicle passage of the balise (2) is determined depending on the position information of the rail vehicle (7) and the position of the balise (2), wherein the expected time instant or expected time interval of the rail vehicle passage is compared to a detected time instant of a rail vehicle passage of the balise unit (2), wherein the detected time instant is determined depending on the reception of the telegram switch inhibit signal (RS) by the balise-related control unit (3), wherein the operability of the balise (2) is monitored depending on the comparison of the expected time instant or expected time interval of the expected rail vehicle passage and the detected time instant of the rail vehicle passage of the balise (2).
 
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the position information of the rail vehicle (7) is determined depending on the output signal of at least one track circuit (6a, 6b).
 
3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the position information of the rail vehicle (7) is determined depending on the output signal of at least one axle counter.
 
4. The method according to one of the claims 1 to 3, wherein the position information is correlated to the balise-related rail vehicle passage information.
 
5. The method according to one of the claims 1 to 4, wherein the operability of the balise (2) is monitored by an interlocking control unit (5), wherein the balise-related control unit (3) and a means for determining position information of the rail vehicle (7) are connected to the interlocking control unit (5), wherein the interlocking control unit (5) performs the comparison.
 
6. The method according to one of the claims 1 to 5, wherein an alarm signal is generated if at least one criterion for a correct operability of the balise (2) is not met.
 
7. A system for monitoring the operability of a balise (2) for transmitting information to a rail vehicle (7), wherein the system (1) comprises at least one balise (2) and a balise-related control unit (3), wherein an tele-powering signal (10) emitted by the rail vehicle (7) is receivable by the balise (2), wherein a telegram switch inhibit signal (RS) is generatable by the balise (2) and transmittable to a balise-related control unit (3) upon reception of the tele-powering signal (10),
characterized in that
the system (1) comprises at least one monitoring means, wherein the operability of the balise (2) is monitorable by the at least one monitoring means depending on the telegram switch inhibit signal (RS), wherein a position information of the rail vehicle (7) is determinable, wherein the position information is comparable to balise-related rail vehicle passage information, wherein the operability of the balise (2) is monitorable depending on the comparison of the position information and the balise-related rail vehicle passage information,wherein an expected time instant or an expected time interval of a rail vehicle passage of the balise (2) is determinable depending on the position information of the rail vehicle (7) and the position of the balise (2), wherein the expected time instant or expected time interval of the rail vehicle passage is comparable to a detected time instant of a rail vehicle passage of the balise unit (2), wherein the detected time instant is determinable depending on the reception of the telegram switch inhibit signal (RS) by the balise-related control unit (3), wherein the operability of the balise (2) is monitorable depending on the comparison of the expected time instant or expected time interval of the expected rail vehicle passage and the detected time instant of the rail vehicle passage of the balise (2).
 
8. The system according to claim 7, wherein the system (1) comprises at least one means for determining vehicle position information.
 
9. The system according to claim 8, wherein the at least one means for determining vehicle position information is provided by a track circuit (6a, 6b) or an axle counter.
 
10. The system according to claim 7 to 9, wherein the system comprises an interlocking control unit (5), wherein the operability of the balise (2) is monitorable by the interlocking control unit (5), wherein the balise-related control unit (3) and the means for determining position information of the rail vehicle (7) are connected to the interlocking control unit (5), wherein the interlocking control unit (5) performs the comparison.
 
11. The system according to one of the claims 7 to 10, wherein the balise (2) is connected to the balise-related control unit (3) by a cable (4).
 


Ansprüche

1. Verfahren zur Überwachung der Funktionsfähigkeit einer Balise (2), die zur Übertragung von Informationen zu einem Schienenfahrzeug (7) verwendet wird, wobei ein vom Schienenfahrzeug (7) ausgesendetes Signal (10) zur drahtlosen Energieübertragung von der Balise (2) empfangen wird,
wobei ein Telegrammwechselverhinderungssignal (RS) durch die Balise (2) erzeugt wird und an eine Steuereinheit (3) der Balise bei Empfang des Signals (10) zur drahtlosen Energieübertragung übertragen wird,
dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass
die Funktionsfähigkeit der Balise (2) in Abhängigkeit vom Telegrammwechselverhinderungssignal (RS) für den Telegrammschalter überwacht wird, wobei Positionsdaten des Schienenfahrzeugs (7) bestimmt werden, wobei die Positionsdaten mit einer Balise-bezogenen Information über das Überfahren des Schienenfahrzeugs verglichen werden, wobei die Funktionsfähigkeit der Balise (2) in Abhängigkeit vom Vergleich der Positionsdaten mit der Balise-bezogenen Information über das Überfahren des Schienenfahrzeugs überwacht wird, wobei ein erwarteter Zeitpunkt oder ein erwartetes Zeitintervall des Überfahrens der Balise (2) durch das Schienenfahrzeug in Abhängigkeit von den Positionsdaten des Schienenfahrzeugs (7) und der Position der Balise (2) bestimmt wird, wobei der erwartete Zeitpunkt oder das erwartete Zeitintervall des Überfahrens durch das Schienenfahrzeug mit dem von der Balise (2) festgestellten Zeitpunkt eines Überfahrens durch das Schienenfahrzeugs verglichen wird, wobei der festgestellte Zeitpunkt in Abhängigkeit vom Empfang des Telegrammwechselverhinderungssignal (RS) durch die Steuereinheit (3) der Balise bestimmt wird, wobei die Funktionsfähigkeit der Balise (2) in Abhängigkeit vom Vergleich des erwarteten Zeitpunkts oder Zeitintervalls des erwarteten Überfahrens durch das Schienenfahrzeug und des festgestellten Zeitpunkts des Überfahrens der Balise (2) durch das Schienenfahrzeug überwacht wird.
 
2. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, wobei die Positionsdaten des Schienenfahrzeugs (7) in Abhängigkeit vom Ausgangssignal von mindestens einem Gleiskreis (6a, 6b) bestimmt werden.
 
3. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, wobei die Positionsdaten des Schienenfahrzeugs (7) in Abhängigkeit vom Ausgangssignal von mindestens einem Achszähler bestimmt werden.
 
4. Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 3, wobei die Positionsdaten mit der Balisebezogener Information über das Überfahren durch das Schienenfahrzeug in Beziehung gesetzt werden.
 
5. Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 4, wobei die Funktionsfähigkeit der Balise (2) durch eine Interlocking-Steuereinheit (5) überwacht wird, wobei die Steuereinheit (3) der Balise und eine Vorrichtung zur Erfassung der Positionsdaten des Schienenfahrzeugs (7) mit der Interlocking-Steuereinheit (5) verbunden sind, wobei die Interlocking-Steuereinheit (5) den Vergleich durchführt.
 
6. Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 5, wobei ein Alarmsignal erzeugt wird, wenn mindestens ein Kriterium für eine einwandfreie Funktionsfähigkeit der Balise (2) nicht erfüllt ist.
 
7. System zur Überwachung der Funktionsfähigkeit einer Balise (2) zur Übertragung von Informationen zu einem Schienenfahrzeug (7), wobei das System (1) zumindest eine Balise (2) und eine Steuereinheit (3) der Balise aufweist, wobei ein von dem Schienenfahrzeug (7) ausgesendetes Signal (10) zur drahtlosen Energieübertragung von der Balise (2) empfangbar ist, wobei ein Telegrammwechselverhinderungssignal (RS) durch die Balise (2) erzeugbar ist und zu einer Steuereinheit (3) der Balise beim Empfang des Signals (10) zur drahtlosen Energieübertragung übertragbar ist,
dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass
das System (1) zumindest ein Überwachungsmittel aufweist, wobei die Funktionsfähigkeit der Balise (2) durch das zumindest ein Überwachungsmittel in Abhängigkeit von dem Telegrammwechselverhinderungssignal (RS) überwachbar ist, wobei Positionsdaten des Schienenfahrzeugs (7) bestimmbar sind, wobei die Positionsdaten mit einer Balisebezogenen Information über das Überfahren des Schienenfahrzeugs vergleichbar sind, wobei die Funktionsfähigkeit der Balise (2) in Abhängigkeit vom Vergleich der Positionsdaten mit der Balise-bezogenen Information über das Überfahren des Schienenfahrzeugs überwachbar ist, wobei ein erwarteter Zeitpunkt oder ein erwartetes Zeitintervall des Überfahrens der Balise (2) durch das Schienenfahrzeug in Abhängigkeit von den Positionsdaten des Schienenfahrzeugs (7) und der Position der Balise (2) bestimmbar ist, wobei der erwartete Zeitpunkt oder das erwartete Zeitintervall des Überfahrens durch das Schienenfahrzeug mit dem von der Balise (2) festgestellten Zeitpunkt eines Überfahrens durch das Schienenfahrzeug vergleichbar ist, wobei der festgestellte Zeitpunkt in Abhängigkeit vom Empfang des Telegrammwechselverhinderungssignal (RS) durch die Balise-bezogene Steuereinheit (3) bestimmbar ist, wobei die Funktionsfähigkeit der Balise (2) in Abhängigkeit vom Vergleich des erwarteten Zeitpunkts oder Zeitintervalls des erwarteten Überfahrens durch das Schienenfahrzeug und des festgestellten Zeitpunkts des Überfahrens der Balise (2) durch das Schienenfahrzeug überwachbar ist.
 
8. System nach Anspruch 7, wobei das System (1) mindestens eine Vorrichtung zur Erfassung der Positionsdaten des Fahrzeugs aufweist.
 
9. System nach Anspruch 8, wobei die mindestens eine Vorrichtung zur Erfassung der Positionsdaten des Fahrzeugs in Form eines Gleiskreises (6a, 6b) oder eines Achszählers bereitgestellt wird.
 
10. System nach Anspruch 7 bis 9, wobei das System eine Interlocking-Steuereinheit (5) aufweist, wobei die Funktionsfähigkeit der Balise (2) durch die Interlocking- Steuereinheit (5) überwachbar ist, wobei die Steuereinheit (3) der Balise und eine Vorrichtung zur Erfassung der Positionsdaten des Schienenfahrzeugs (7) mit der Interlocking-Steuereinheit (5) verbunden sind, wobei die Interlocking-Steuereinheit (5) den Vergleich durchführt.
 
11. System nach einem der Ansprüche 7 bis 10, wobei die Balise (2) mit der Steuereinheit (3) der Balise mittels eines Kabels (4) verbunden ist.
 


Revendications

1. Procédé pour surveiller la capacité de fonctionnement d'une balise (2) pour transmettre des informations à un véhicule ferroviaire (7), dans lequel un télé-signal de mise sous tension (10) émis par le véhicule ferroviaire (7) est reçu par la balise (2), dans lequel un signal de prévention de commutation de télégramme (RS) est généré par la balise (2) et transmis à une unité de commande (3) connexe à la balise lors de la réception du télé-signal de mise sous tension (10),
caractérisé en ce que
la capacité de fonctionnement de la balise (2) est surveillée en fonction du signal de prévention de commutation de télégramme (RS), dans lequel des informations de position du véhicule ferroviaire (7) sont déterminées, dans lequel les informations de positions ont comparées à des informations de passage de véhicule ferroviaire connexes à la balise, dans lequel la capacité de fonctionnement de la balise (2) est surveillée en fonction de la comparaison des informations de position et des informations de passage de véhicule ferroviaire connexes à la balise, dans lequel un instant temporel prévu ou un intervalle temporel prévu d'un passage de véhicule ferroviaire de la balise (2) est déterminé en fonction des informations de position du véhicule ferroviaire (7) et de la position de la balise (2), dans lequel l'instant temporel prévu ou l'intervalle temporel prévu du passage de véhicule ferroviaire est comparé à un instant temporel détecté d'un passage de véhicule ferroviaire de l'unité de balise (2), dans lequel l'instant temporel détecté est déterminé en fonction de la réception du signal de prévention de commutation de télégramme (RS) par l'unité de commande (3) connexe à la balise, dans lequel la capacité de fonctionnement de la balise (2) est surveillée en fonction de la comparaison de l'instant temporel prévu ou de l'intervalle temporel prévu du passage de véhicule ferroviaire prévu et de l'instant temporel détecté du passage de véhicule ferroviaire de la balise (2).
 
2. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel les informations de position du véhicule ferroviaire (7) sont déterminées en fonction du signal de sortie d'au moins un circuit de voie (6a, 6b).
 
3. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel les informations de position du véhicule ferroviaire (7) sont déterminées en fonction du signal de sortie d'au moins un compteur d'essieux.
 
4. Procédé selon l'une des revendications 1 à 3, dans lequel les informations de position sont corrélées aux informations de passage de véhicule ferroviaire connexes à la balise.
 
5. Procédé selon l'une des revendications 1 à 4, dans lequel la capacité de fonctionnement de la balise (2) est surveillée par une unité de commande d'enclenchement (5), dans lequel l'unité de commande (3) connexe à la balise et un moyen pour déterminer des informations de position du véhicule ferroviaire (7) sont connectés à l'unité de commande d'enclenchement (5), dans lequel l'unité de commande d'enclenchement (5) réalise la comparaison.
 
6. Procédé selon l'une des revendications 1 à 5, dans lequel un signal d'alarme est généré si au moins un critère pour une capacité de fonctionnement correcte de la balise (2) n'est pas respecté.
 
7. Système pour surveiller la capacité de fonctionnement d'une balise (2) pour transmettre des informations à un véhicule ferroviaire (7), dans lequel le système (1) comprend au moins une balise (2) et une unité de commande (3) connexe à la balise, dans lequel un télé-signal de mise sous tension (10) émis par le véhicule ferroviaire (7) est recevable par la balise (2), dans lequel un signal de prévention de commutation de télégramme (RS) peut être généré par la balise (2) et transmis à une unité de commande (3) connexe à la balise lors de la réception du télé-signal de mise sous tension (10),
caractérisé en ce que
le système (1) comprend au moins un moyen de surveillance, dans lequel la capacité de fonctionnement de la balise (2) peut être surveillée par l'au moins un moyen de surveillance en fonction du signal de prévention de commutation de télégramme (RS), dans lequel des informations de position du véhicule ferroviaire (7) peuvent être déterminées, dans lequel les informations de position peuvent être comparées à des informations de passage de véhicule ferroviaire connexes à la balise, dans lequel la capacité de fonctionnement de la balise (2) peut être surveillée en fonction de la comparaison des informations de position et des informations de passage de véhicule ferroviaire connexes à la balise, dans lequel un instant temporel prévu ou un intervalle temporel prévu d'un passage de véhicule ferroviaire de la balise (2) peut être déterminé en fonction des informations de position du véhicule ferroviaire (7) et de la position de la balise (2), dans lequel l'instant temporel prévu ou intervalle temporel prévu du passage de véhicule ferroviaire peut être comparé à un instant temporel détecté d'un passage de véhicule ferroviaire de l'unité de balise (2), dans lequel l'instant temporel détecté peut être déterminé en fonction de la réception du signal de prévention de commutation de télégramme (RS) par l'unité de commande (3) connexe à la balise, dans lequel la capacité de fonctionnement de la balise (2) peut être surveillée en fonction de la comparaison de l'instant temporel prévu ou de l'intervalle temporel prévu du passage de véhicule ferroviaire prévu et de l'instant temporel détecté du passage de véhicule ferroviaire de la balise (2).
 
8. Système selon la revendication 7, dans lequel le système (1) comprend au moins un moyen pour déterminer des informations de position de véhicule.
 
9. Système selon la revendication 8, dans lequel l'au moins un moyen pour déterminer des informations de position de véhicule est prévu par un circuit de voie (6a, 6b) ou un compteur d'essieux.
 
10. Système selon la revendication 7 à 9, dans lequel le système comprend une unité de commande d'enclenchement (5), dans lequel la capacité de fonctionnement de la balise (2) peut être surveillée par l'unité de commande d'enclenchement (5), dans lequel l'unité de commande (3) connexe à la balise et le moyen pour déterminer des informations de position du véhicule ferroviaire (7) sont connectés à l'unité de commande d'enclenchement (5), dans lequel l'unité de commande d'enclenchement (5) réalise la comparaison.
 
11. Système selon l'une des revendications 7 à 10, dans lequel la balise (2) est connectée à l'unité de commande (3) connexe à la balise par un câble (4).
 




Drawing








Cited references

REFERENCES CITED IN THE DESCRIPTION



This list of references cited by the applicant is for the reader's convenience only. It does not form part of the European patent document. Even though great care has been taken in compiling the references, errors or omissions cannot be excluded and the EPO disclaims all liability in this regard.

Patent documents cited in the description




Non-patent literature cited in the description