[0001] This invention relates to inducing anorexia in mammals by administering naltrexone
orally thereto, with the object of removing unsightly obesity.
[0002] Naltrexone, otherwise known as (-)-17-(cyclopropylmethyl)-4,5a-epoxy-3,14-dihydroxymorphinan-6-one,
is known to be a potent narcotic antagonist which shows considerable promise for the
treatment of opiate dependence in man..It can be prepared in accordance with the teachings
of Blumberg et al. in U.S. Patent 3,322,950, as well as those of Pachter et al. in
Canadian Patent 913,077.
[0003] Obesity is an unsightly condition affecting a significant proportion of the population
in developed countries. The condition can be overcome, in principle, by control of
the diet but the natural appetite for food makes dieting control difficult to maintain.
If the appetite could be reduced to a level at which it is satisfied by a calorie
intake insufficient to maintain body weight, the cosmetic improvement caused by removal
of obesity would become available to those people who cannot adhere to a calorie-controlled
diet. None of the appetite supressants currently available is completely satisfactory.
[0004] Although obesity is mainly a human problem, it can also affect domestic animals.
Dogs, in particular, can become very obese after some years of domestic life and strongly
protest at any attempt to reduce their intake of food.
[0005] Holtzman, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., Vol. 189, pages 51-60 (1974), has shown that
naloxone (N-allyl-14-hydroxy-7,8-dihydronormorphinone) suppresses eating in food-deprived
rats but not in food-deprived mice. In a subsequent study, Holtzman showed that the
fluid intake (sweetened Enfamil) of rats was reduced following subcutaneous administration
of naloxone, naltrexone or nalorphine (N-allylmorphine); Life Sciences, Vol. 16, pages
1465-1470. Having observed in the prior study that the anorexigenic activity of naloxone
was species dependent, in the latter study, Holtzman questioned whether naltrexone
and nalorphine might show similar species specificity.
[0006] The oral route for drug administration is the oldest, and it may be the safest, most
convenient, most important, most practical and most economical. However, the fact
that a drug causes a certain effect when administered by the parenteral route, e.g.
anorexia, does not guarantee that the same effect will be obtained at all when the
drug is administered by the oral route. Much less is there any assurance that the
same effect will be achieved when the drug is administered orally at a reasonable
dosage level. Some drugs may be destroyed by digestive enzymes or low gastric pH.
Drugs may form complexes with food which cannot be absorbed. In addition, drugs absorbed
from the gastrointestinal tract may be extensively metabolized by the liver before
they gain access to the general circulation. In some instances, parenteral administration
is essential for the drug to be absorbed in active form. Moreover, there may be other
disadvantages to administration of a drug by the oral route; e.g. the gastrointestinal
mucosa may become irritated by an orally administered drug and cause emesis.
[0007] No study directed to the use of naltrexone as an oral anorexigenic agent has been
reported heretofore. However, several studies, directed to the safety and efficacy
of naltrexone as an oral narcotic anta
go-nist, contain some isolated and contradictory statements relating to the effect
thereof on appetite in man. In all of those studies, the appetite effect was reported
by the opiate users themselves; it was not observed by any professional personnel,
medical or pharmacological.
[0008] Shecter et al., Proceedings of the National Association for the Prevention of Addiction
to Narcotics, pages 754-765 (1974), report oral administration of naltrexone to 30
male and female subjects, all but 2 of which had been dependent on opiates. One patient,
who was receiving 50 mg of naltrexone per day, reported appetite decrease during the
naltrexone maintenance period. Another patient, who was receiving a placebo, reported
appetite decrease during induction, maintenance, and abrupt withdrawal periods; while
yet another patient, who was also receiving a placebo, reported appetite increase
during all three such periods. other patients, who were receiving 125 mg of naltrexone
on alternate days of each week, reported both appetite decrease and appetite increase
(the number of such patients was not given). No such effect on appetite was reported
by the 2 subjects (physicians) having no history of opiate dependence.
[0009] Lewis, American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, Vol. 2, (3-4), pages 403-412 (1975),
states, in a preliminary report, that the six symptoms most frequently reported by
male opiate-addicted patients, following oral naltrexone induction and maintenance,
were sweating, yawning, muscle and joint pain, lack of appetite and lack of sexual
desire. Except for lack of appetite, all of those symptoms were present also at the
same or higher levels prior to naltrexone induction and maintenance. No dosage level
information was given by Lewis. Loss of appetite in opiate-addicted patients who are
in withdrawal is, of course, no indication of the anorexigenic effect of a drug in
non-addicts.
[0010] In a study of "street addicts", "methadone maintenance" patients and "post addicts",
Bradford et al., National Institute of Drug Abuse Research, (197.6) Monograph Series
9, one patient out of 45 who was receiving naltrexone, and one patient out of 45 who
was receiving a placebo, reported loss of appetite. No dosage information was given.
[0011] A method for exerting an anorexigenic effect in mammals has now been discovered which
comprises orally administering to a mammal an effective anorexigenic dose of naltrexone
or a pharmaceutically effective salt thereof.
[0012] In one aspect
ou
r invention provides a method of improving the bodily appearance of a non-opiate-addicted
mammal which comprises orally administering to said mammal naltrexone or a pharmaceutically
effective salt thereof in a dosage effective to reduce appetite, and repeating said
dosage until a cosmetically beneficial loss of body weight has occurred.
[0013] Naltrexone exhibits a lower potential for causing side-effects than either amphetamine
or fenfluramine, both of which have been used for combatting obesity. In particular,
it is neither a stimulant nor a depressant; it does not cause central nervous system
excitement, sedation, hypothermia or other side effects. Serious side effects are
not acceptable in a treatment whose purpose is primarily cosmetic.
[0014] The anorexigenic activity of naltrexone is demonstrated by administering naltrexone
to experimental animals and comparing the results with those obtained with a known
anorexigenic agent. Naltrexone hydrochloride caused decreased milk-drop consumption
in mice, rats and monkeys at lower effective doses than did fenfluramine hydrochloride.
Mouse Anorexia Test
[0015] In a quiet room, female white mice, weighing 19-21 g each, which had been fasted
for 17-24 hours, were dosed orally with naltrexone-HCl or fenfluramine HCl salt weight
basis in 1.25% Tween 80-1% Methocel - water, at 10 ml/kg mouse. 30 Minutes later,
each mouse was transferred to an individual, clear, Lucite@ compartment (13.3 cm x
12.7 cm x 1.27 cm) with 0.64 cm x 0.64 cm wire mesh floor. Inside each compartment
there was a section of black Lucite® bar (13 cm x 1.2 cm x 1.2 cm) with 10 spot depressions
(0.8 cm diameter).each containing 0.05 ml of 50%-diluted sweetened condensed milk.
30 Minutes later, the number of milk spots consumed was counted. Percent anorexia
is calculated based'on milk consumption of concurrent vehicle-treated-control mice.
The data for concurrently tested naltrexone·HCl and fenfluramine-HCl are given in
Table I. ED50%, the effective dose to cause a 50% decrease in milk consumption from
control mice,is calculated from a graphical fit of the data.

[0016] In accordance with the studies summarized in Table I, the ED50% for naltrexone in
mice is 8.0 mg/kg as compared to 14.3 mg/kg for fenfluramine hydrochloride.
Rat Anorexia Test
[0017] The procedure of the Mouse Anorexia Test was repeated except that the milk drops
were placed in depressions in brass bars, 20 drops per rat. The results of the Rat
Anorexia Test are set forth in Table II. Pursuant thereto, the ED50% for naltrexone
hydrochloride in rats is 3.2 mg/kg as compared to 4.7 mg/kg for fenfluramine hydrochloride.

Monkey Anorexia Test
[0018] Naltrexone and fenfluramine were tested in a side by side dose/time response comparison
for anorexia in male Brazilian or Colombian squirrel monkeys. The monkeys (0.9-1.3
kg) were dosed at a minimum interval of seven days using a Latin-square design. They
were fasted 16-17 hours prior to dosing. Room temperature was maintained at 25-26°C.
[0019] Tween® 80 (1 drop/ml 1% Methocel@) was added to make the stock solutions of the test
compounds. These were sonicated, then beadmilled for an hour. The naltrexone doses
were 0.0, 0.22, 0.67, 2.0, and 6.0 mg/kg. Fenfluramine was tested at 0, 2.0, 4.0,
8.0, and 16.0 mg/kg. The monkeys were dosed orally with coded doses of the compounds
at 2.0 ml/kg.
[0020] After the monkeys were weighed and dosed, they were returned to their cages. At 0.5,
1.0, and 2.0 hours after dosing, 30 g of banana-milk in a rubber-stoppered, inverted,
glass bottle was suspended from each cage. (Banana-milk is made by mixing 1 can (397
g) of sweetened, condensed milk (Borden's Eagle Brand) and 2 ml of banana creme flavoring
(Lorann Oils) in .1000 ml water.) Each drinking interval lasted for 15 minutes. The
bottles were weighed before and after each drinking period to determine the amount
of banana-milk consumed. The methocel controls generally drank 22-24 g of banana-milk
at each drinking interval.'
Side Effects
[0022] Naltrexone is less toxic orally in mice and has less potential for causing other
side effects than either amphetamine or fenfluramine. These characteristics are illustrated
by the following tests in mice.
[0023] Female white mice, weighing 16-20 g each, which had been fasted for 17-24 hours were
dosed orally with naltrexone, amphetamine, or fenfluramine at 0, 4, 12, 36, 108,or
324 mg/kg. The mice were observed at 0.5, 2, 5, and 24 hours after dosing for number
of survivors and for signs of mydriasis, ataxia, auditory
pinna reflex loss, protection against electroshock, hyperthermia, CNS stimulation (excitement)
and tremors.
Mydriasis
[0024] Pupillary diameter was measured with a dissecting microscope, the eyepiece of which.is
fitted with a 100 mm micrometer disc divided into 0.1 mm divisions. A pupillary diameter
of 15 divisions (1.5 mm) constituted mydriasis (dilation),
Ataxia
[0025] The mouse was placed upright on the benchtop facing away from the observer. Motor
incoordination manifested by abnormal gait or lack of precision during purposive movements
constituted ataxia.
Auditory Pinna Twitch Reflex
[0026] The mouse (front paws) was placed on a bar, 10 to 20 cm horizontally and 9 cm vertically
from a Galton whistle adjusted for 13,000 Hertz and with the air escape pointing away
from the mouse. If the mouse did not flatten or twitch its ears after 1 or 2 short
(0.5 sec) bursts of sound, the pinna reflex was considered.lost.
Electroshock Convulsions (EST)
[0027] The mice were held by the tail and neck nape and were positioned with the corneas
of their eyes touching saline-saturated wick electrodes. A supra- maximal (50 ma,
70 volts) alternating current was passed for 0.2 second through the corneal electrodes.
Failure of a mouse to extend its hind limbs constituted blockade of the electroshock
convulsion.
Hyperthermia
[0028] Rectal temperature were taken using a KC-1 thermocouple probe. Temperature more than
2 standard deviations above the mean of 100 vehicle-treated control mice constituted
hyperthermia,
Excitement
[0029] Increased spontaneous motor activity, running and jumping prior to handling were
recorded as excitement (CNS stimuationl.
Tremors
[0030] All non-convulsive involuntary fine, coarse, intermittent or continuous movement
including fasciculations were recorded as tremors.
[0031] The results of the foregoing tests are given in Table VI. This table lists the ED50,
in mg/kg, of each drug tested for each symptom observed. The ED50 is the effective
dose at which fifty percent of the mice tested exhibited a given symptom. These results
clearly indicate that naltrexone is less toxic and has less potential for other side-effects
in mice than either amphetamine or fenfluramine, both standard anorectics.

[0032] The dose which would constitute an anorexi- genically effective dose in a given mammal
would be obvious to one skilled in,the art. Based upon the data set forth in the above
tables, the human oral dose of naltrexone for use as an anorectic is, according to
this invention, 10 to 100 mg per day, preferably 20 mg given 3 or 4 times daily or
60-80 mg total daily dose.
[0033] The following provides an example of a suitable dosage form. Equivalent materials
and techniques may be used also.

The compound, a portion of the starch, and the lactose are combined and wet granulated
with starch paste. The wet granulation is placed on.trays and-allowed to dry overnight
at a temperature of 45°C, The dried granulation is comminuted in a comminutor to a
particle size of approximately 20 mesh. Magnesium stearate, stearic acid, and the
balance of the starch are added and the entire mix blended prior to compression on
a suitable tablet press. The tablets are compressed at a weight of 232 mg, using a
11/32 inch punch with a hardness of 4 kg. These tablets will disintegrate within a
half hour according to the method described in USP XVI.