[0001] The present invention relates to air expansion chambers for air filter assemblies
or exhaust systems of internal combustion engines.
[0002] Air filter assemblies for internal combustion engines comprise one or more expansion
chambers through which air passes before entering the combustion chambers of the engine,
an air filter being mounted in the, or one of the, chambers. For example, in one conventional
single-chamber air filter assembly, the expansion chamber comprises a supporting surface
on which a removable annular air filter may be positioned, an annular wall surrounding
the supporting surface and a closure. The air filter is usually held centrally within
the chamber between the supporting surface and the closure, and air is drawn through
the filter from an air inlet in the annular wall to an air outlet positioned centrally
in the supporting surface.
[0003] The shape and relative positions of the inlet and outlet to the exapnsion chamber
must be so positioned that the air filter assembly does not interfere with the surrounding
components of the engine on which it is mounted, for this reason, we have found it
desirable to mount the outlet to the expansion chamber asymmetrically with respect
to the surrounding walls of the chamber. Where the outlet is in the form of a simple
aperture in one wall of the chamber however, the chamber generates undesirably high
noise levesl within certain operating frequencies of the engine.
[0004] Similarly, asymmetrical outlet orifices in expansion chambers of exhaust systems
can generate high noise levels.
[0005] In accordance with the present invention, we have found that the noise levels can
be substantially reduced by froming the outlet orifice in a cowl within the chamber
so that the outlet orifice is inclined to the plane of the wall in which it is mounted.
[0006] The present invention therefore specifically provides an expansion chamber for an
air filter assembly or an exhaust system of an internal combustion engine comprising
an air inlet to the chamber, and an air outlet in one wall of the chamber, the air
outlet being positioned asymmetrically with respect to surrounding walls of the chamber
and including a cowl defining an outlet orifice which is inclined to the plane of
the said one wall.
[0007] In one embodiment of the invention, the expansion chamber is constructed to accommodate
an air filter element which is positioned on the said one wall around the outlet,
and a wall opposite the said one wall comprises a removable closure allowing access
to the extension chamber for installation and removal of the filter element. With
such a chamber, the outlet orifice is preferably so inclined that its plane intersects
the wall opposite the said one wall. In general the outlet orifice say be inclined
to the supporting surface at any angle up to 90°. Preferably the angle of inclination
is from 10 to 60°, desirably from 15°to 30°.
[0008] Usually the outlet orifice will be oriented to face across the largest dimension
of the said one wall.
[0009] In order to improve air flow through the outlet, the orifice is preferably defined
by an outwardly flared lip on the cowl.
[0010] The holder may be manufactured from any suitable material, for example pressed steel
or a moulded plastics material.
[0011] Embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with
reference to the accompanying drawings in which:-
Figure 1 is a vertical cross-section through a first embodiment of an air filter assembly
incorporating an expansion chamber in accordance with the invention;
Figure 2 is a transverse cross-section of the assembly of Figure 1 on a reduced scale
with its filter and closure removed;
Figure 3 is a plan view of an expansion chamber of similar construction to that of
Figures 1 and 2 but not in accordance with the invention;
Figure 4 is a vertical corss-section of part of an alternative chamber in accordance
with the inventionl;
Figure 5 is a graph indicating the sound characteristics of various air filter assemblies;
[0012] Referring to Figures 1 and 2, the air filter assembly comprises an expansion chamber
1 which is composed of a supporting wall 2 and an integral annular wall 3. In the
embodiment illustrated, the annular wall 3 is circular in plan, but other shapes may
be used. A closure 5 is mounted on top of the wall 3 by a conventional releasable
fastener (not shown) and forms an airtight seal with the wall 3.
[0013] An annular filter cartridge 6 is positioned between the closure 5 and the supporting
wall 2 and is held in sealing engagement therewith.
[0014] The wall 3 defines an air inlet orifice 7 in which an air feed tube 8 is mounted.
The supporting wall 2 carried a cowl 9 which defines a circular outlet orifice 10.
The cowl 9 is offset from the centre 11 of the supporting wall and so shaped that
the orifice 10 lies in a plane which is inclindd at an angle A to the plane of the
supporting wall 3. In the embodiment illustrated the angle A is 45°, and the plane
of the orifice 10 passes through the closure 5, as indicated by the broken line B
in Figure 1. As best seen from Figure 2, the orifice 10 faces across the largest dimension
of the chamber 1, generally towards the inlet orifice 7. The precise angle of inclination
A of the orifice 10 and its orientation with respect to the inlet orifice 7 will vary
according to the exact construction of the holder and is determined by simple experiment.
[0015] In use, the chamber 1 is mounted on an internal combustion engine so that the cowl
9 communicates with the carburettor of the engine. The fact that the cowl 9 is off-set
from the centre of the supporting wall 3 facilitates accommodation of the assembly
adjacent bulky engine components, and the inclination of the orifice 10 reduces the
level of noise which would otherwise be generated in the chamber 1.
[0016] Although we do not wish to be limited by any theoretical explanation of the operation
of the expansion chamber we believe that the inclination of the orifice 10 reduces
the possibility of reverberation in the chamber 1. Figure 3 illustrates a chamber
of similar shape and size to that of Figures 1 and 2 but in which the outlet orifice
lies in the plane of the supporting wall 2. We believe that, in the chamber of Figure
3, sound waves emitted from the orifice, indicated by broken lines 14, meet opposite
sides of the annular wall 3 at different times, and interfere with the sound waves
reflected from the walls 3 indicated by the broken lines 15. At certain frequencies,
this interference will be additive, thus causing the chamber to generate a loud note.
[0017] By contrast, in the chamber of the present invention, the sound waves generated at
the orifice 10 (see Figure 2) all meet the wall 3 substantially simultaneously. Reflected
waves from the walls do not therefore interfere additively with the original waves.
In this respect, the wave forms within the chamber are similar to those of conventional
expansion chambers in which the outlet is located centrally in the supporting wall.
The leve.1s of noise generated by such chambers are usually completely acceptable.
[0018] The audible characteristics of a number of chambers are illustrated in Figure 5.
Curve 1 was obtained using a conventional air filter assembly having a chamber of
similar shape to that of Figure 1, except that the outlet orifice was located centrally
in the supporting wall. The chamber was connected to a loudspeaker system c apable
of emitting signals in the frequency range 30-1000 Hz, and the sound emitted from
the chamber was detected and its frequency analysed using conventional sound analysis
equipment. Figure 5 illustrates the variation in intensity of the sound emitted by
the chamber over the frequency range 400 to 900 Hz, which is the range in which greatest
variation in intensities is observed with the chambers tested. The intensity is recorded
on the ordinate in decibels, and the frequency is recorded on the abscissa in Hertz.
As can be seen from Figure 5, the frequency curve exhibits there maxima in the region
of 450, 650 and 850 Hz. The noise emitted by the chamber when fitted to a vehicle
was acceptable.
[0019] The audible characteristics of a number of chambers are illustrated in Figure 5.
Curve 1 was obtained using a conventional air filter assembly having a chamber of
similar shape to that of Figure 1, except that the outlet orifice was located eentrally
in the supporting wall. The chamber was connected to a loudspeaker system capable
of emitting signals in the frequency range 30 - 1000 Hz,. and the sound emitted from
the chamber was detected and its frequency analysed using conventional sound analysis
equipment. Figure 5 illustrates the variation in intensity of the sound emitted by
the chamber over the frequency range 400 to 900 Hz, which is the range in which greatest
variation in intensities is observed with the chambers tested. The intensity is recorded
on the ordinate in decibels, and the frequency is recorded on the abscissa in Hertz.
As can be seen from Figure 5, the frequency curve exhibits three maxima in the region
of 450, 650 and 850 Hz. The noise emitted by the chamber when fitted to a vehicle
was acceptable.
[0020] Curve 2 was obtained using a chamber similar to that illustrar- ted in Figure 3.
The noise level emitted by the chamber was generally much higher than that of the
first chamber. The curve also exhibits three maxima at approximately the same frequencies
as curve 1. However the level of sound emitted at frequencies above 650 Hz is much
higher, indicating the general increase in noise which produced unacceptable noise
levels when fitted to a vehicle.
[0021] Curve 3 was obtained using a chamber similar to that of Figure 1, except that the
cowl 9 is curved through 90° (i.e. the angle A is equal to 909). The noise emitted
by the chamber was less than that emitted by the second chamber and would have been
acceptable for commercial use. The level was however greater than that emitted by
the first chamber. The curve also exhibits the three maxima at about 430, 650 and
850 Hz. In contrast to curve 2 however, the sound levels at frequencies between 650
and 850 Hz are greatly reduced.
[0022] Curve 4 was obtained using a chamber similar to that of Figure 1 in hhich the angle
A of the cowl was 20°. The noise emitted by this chamber was less than that of either
the second or third chamber. Thus, the audible frequency distribution curve exhibits
the same three maxima as curves 1 to 3, but the maximum at about 850 Hz is no greater
than that for curve
1, and the levels for frequencies in the range 750 to 800 Hz are substantially less
than those of curves 2 and 3.
[0023] Figure 4 illustrates an alternative construction for the cowl of a chamber in accordance
with the invention. The orifice of the cowl 9 is in the form of an outwardly flared
lip 19 which smooths the passage of air through the cowl and thereby reduces the restriction
on the air flow which is produced by sharp-edged orifices.
[0024] Both embodiments of the invention may be manufactured cheaply and easily as plastics
mouldings or, alternatively, as metal pressings.
[0025] Although the embodiments of the invention described above are expansion chambers
for air filter assemblies of internal combustion engines; the invention is equally
applicable to expansion chambers of engine exhaust systems.
1. An expansion chamber for an air filter assembly or an exhaust system of an internal
combustion engine comprising an air inlet to the chamber, and an air outlet in one
wall of the chamber, the air outlet being positoned asymmetrically with respect to
surrounding walls of the chamber and including a cowl defining an outlet orifice which
is inclined to the plane of the said one wall.
2. A chamber according to claim 1 wherein a removable filter element may be positioned
on the said one wall around the outlet, and a wall opposite the said one wall includes
a removable closure allowing access to the expansion chamber for installation and
replacement of filter elements.
3. A chamber according to claim 2 wherein the outlet orifice is so inclined that its
plane intersects the wall opposite the said one wall.
4. A chamber according to any one of claims 1 to 3 wherein the outlet orifice is oriented
to face across the largest dimension of the said one wall.
5. A chamber according to any one of claims 1 to 4 wherein the outlet orifice is inclined
at an angle of from 15° to 60° to the plane of the said one wall.
6. A chamber according to any one of claims 1 to 5 wherein the outlet orifice is defined
by an outwardly flared lip of the cowl.
7. A chamber for an air filter assembly of an internal combustion engine susbtantially
as described with reference to Figures 1 and 2 of the drawings, or with reference
to Figures 1 and 2 of the drawings as . modified by Figure 4.
8. An air filter assembly for an internal combustion engine comprising an expansion
chamber according to any one of claims 1 to 7 and an air filter.