[0001] The advent of computers in recent years gave rise to the development of what is known
as access flooring. Such flooring comprised a modular embodiment of rigid structural
floor panels supported on pedestal columns and frequently requiring beam-like stringer
members spanned between said columns for edge reinforcement. Typical assemblies were
installed on top of a supporting subfloor, thus providing an adequate and secluded
space to accommodate an array of power cables and the like beneath the readily accessible
floor panels. This underfloor space or cavity also serves well as a distributions
plenum for conditioned air. Change in location and frequent servicing of computerised
equipment in an access floor environment requires repetitive physical handling of
the interconnecting cables and is accomplished quite easily by the temporary removal
of such modular panels. Subsequently, the underfloor cavity is exposed for complete
freedom to perform any task within the maze of previously hidden wiring. When such
work is finished, the modular panels fit quickly and easily back into their original
position, thereby returning the area to a totally unobstructed and uniform top floor
surface.
[0002] In view of the weight of computers and other equipment, it was essential that the
modular floor panels be substantially rigid, such that when loaded they do not appreciably
allow flexure or retain permanent set once flexed, so that the access floor is uniformly
flat and all panels are in a common plane. To accomplish this, some of the earlier
panels were made of substantially reinforced metal encased wood and heavy metalic
castings but this has been appreciably abandoned in favour of lighter weight, high
strength metal sandwich panels of which the panel comprising the subject matter of
U.S. Patent No. 3 236 018, to Graham et al. dated February 22, 1966, is an example
which is popular, is still being produced and is used extensively in the industry.
[0003] In recent years, the access flooring industry has expanded in two ways. The first
is in the field of high performance, heavy duty panels for specific heavy load areas
above and beyond standard computer room criteria. Secondly, the access floor industry
has been expanding more and more into office renovation and general office construction
for new buildings and other typical lighter load applications. A dramatic shift in
the performance requirements for this type of general construction floor has substantially
taken place.
[0004] Current art has attemped to economically satisfy this need by means of altering panel
designs by varying material thicknesses, but sometimes by discarding the standard
stringer support provided at the panel edge. Although this readily achieves a lighter
weight and more economical product, it inherently introduces an objectionable deficiency,
namely, edge-to-edge movement, in the character of the system as viewed by architects
and users who are
tforemost aesthetically minded. Another prominent objection is related to the feel
of springiness within a light-weight floor under normal foot traffic. Insecure feelings
also arise due to the visible edge-to-edge movement between panels under light equipment
use. Although the structural integrity, specifically the ultimate strength, more than
satisfies the most stringent general office construction criteria, this objectionable
panel-to-panel motion is a restricting factor to the growth and acceptance of the
product in the general construction and renovation market.
[0005] The industry, to satisfy this need, has developed systems which reduce perimeter
movement by adding secondary structures, such as perimeter stringers or complex panel-to-panel
hard connecting devices. Although such structures tend to reduce edge-to-edge movement,
they directly affect the accessability and ease of handling the floor system as originally
conceived.
[0006] Additionally, in renovations and, more importantly, in general office construction,
it is desirable to hold the finished floor height of the access floor to a minimum
while providing an adequate space or cavity for underfloor cables and to perform as
an air distribution plenum. Thicker panels diminish vital underfloor clearance or
floor-to-ceiling height. The thickness of the access floor panel is often as much
as one-third of the total of this low finished floor height; therefore, an economical
panel with needed structural properties, yet thinner in depth, is an advancement in
the art and a savings in total building height and cost for new construction, and
also provides the ability to maintain adequate minimum floor-to-ceiling height in
renovations. To do this, the structural efficiency of the panel has to be dramatically
increased over existing art, especially at the perimeter.
[0007] Since the development of the aforementioned patented panel, efforts have been made
to simplify and also reduce the weight and the amount of metal required in said panels,
without reducing, but instead, striving to increase the resistance of the panels to
flexure and/or permanent set, especially at the panel perimeter when subjected to
static or moving loads. This has resulted in explorations and development, especially
in the design, of the structural member which is primarily the lower stress member
in a metal sandwich-type floor panel in which it is able to perform integrally with
the upper planar member upon which the load is usually imposed.
[0008] In such exploration, we have determined that a key factor to resistance to flexure
is the reduction of clear straight lines of vision through said sandwich panel and,
more importantly, the repeated blockage in all directions within the sandwich. It
has been found that several patterns of projections with common strategic dimensional
relationships can provide both necessary blockage of clear lines of vision and suitable
support of the top sheet to resist localised indentation of the access floor panel.
Projections were selected because they combined the benefits of a continuous bottom
member with the support obtained from arch-shaped projections to prevent collapse
thereof, together with an optimum depth which, combined with the structural and economic
efficiency of the section, developed blockage of "see through", thereby providing
sufficient section properties to resist deflection by the loads applied.
[0009] The strategic dimensional relationship is a combination of considerations of five
major characteristics of the projections and their interrelation; namely (1) depth
of projections for needed section modulus and moment of inertia; (2) diameter of projections
to obtain their their needed depth; (3) distance between the centrelines of projections
for sufficient top sheet support; (4) strategic positioning of projections to repeatedly
block clear lines of vision throughout the member; and (5) remaining bottom surface
material adequate to perform as a stress member and also develop necessary section
modulus and moment of inertia. Prior art has failed to combine and/or incorporate
one or more of these five structurally significant characteristics and has, therefore
accomplished a less than optimum one-piece structural member which, when combined
with a top sheet, does not provide an economical metal sandwich construction of desired
comparable strength-to-weight ratio or structural efficiency.
[0010] It has been found that specific patterns of several different embodiments of projections,
in which at least the major portions of the configuration of said projections are
circular and details of which are described fully hereinafter, results in increased
rigidity and resistance to flexure to a marked extent. Said projections are formed
in sheets of planar industrial material of lighter gauge than now employed in the
floor panel of the type shown in said aforementioned Patent No. 3 236 018 for improved
performance under the same load conditions. The efficiency in performance of the developed
core structure has thus been dramatically improved. Such characteristics and features
are not found in the prior art, notwithstanding the disclosure of formed sheets having
various types of projecting ribs and/or figures of a regular contour pressed from
planar sheets and other means which block straight lines of sight across the formed
sheet and through such ribs and figures, either because the configurations do not
permit sufficient depth of section for strength purposes, are not sufficiently conducive
to resist flexure under the required loads existing in access floor use, or are not
economical to competively market the same.
[0011] The prime object of this invention is to form, within a single sheet, a structurally
efficient combination core and bottom stress member which when affixed to a planar
top member surpasses the combined strength, rigidity, and economics of prior art.
[0012] One of the principal objects of the invention is to provide a one-piece rigid structural
member capable of resistance to flexure by the formation of a sheet.of structural
material to include a plurality of dome-like projections which extend from the original
plane of the sheet and in which at least the major portion of the configuration of
each projection is circular in plan view wherein said projections are arranged in
pairs connected by a saddle portion forming an elongated configuration which in plan
view generally resembles a figure 8, peanut-like in shape and wherein said elongated
configurations are arranged in substantially perpendicular basket weave pattern having
a strategic dimensional relationship between the diameter of said projections and
the centre-to-centre distance therebetween and of which, in plan view, the end of
one configuration interfits with the adjacent configurations, thereby repeatedly blocking
straight lines of vision laterally in all directions across said sheet. Further, said
projections which form the pair which resemble a figure 8, are arranged in said sheet
in a structurally strategic geometric pattern of which rows of pairs of dome-like
projections are in a straight line in any direction and said rows are in a perpendicular
basket weave pattern relative to each other. Said pattern repeatedly blocks straight
lines of clear vision in all directions across said sheet and therefore, the occurrence
of said projections in said sheet is such that the spaces between adjacent projections
is inadequate to accommodate another similar projection. Said projections are spaced
from each other a limited distance to provide therebetween intermediate continuous
structural ribbon-like stress-sustaining sections of $uctuating width capable of optimising
stress-resisting integrity with the same being arcuate in plan view and extending
between the opposite edges of said sheet to sustain the stresses under load conditions.
Such a structural member may be utilised in the manufacture of composite sections,
such as access flooring, decking, or other structures which require economical high
strength-to-weight ratios and structural efficiency. Additionally, they can provide
structural components as in the construction of walls and other reinforcements where
the individual sheet is utilised as an intermediate core member, or by itself, as
a flexure-resisting component. Such one-piece structural members readily satisfy demands
and applications in such marketable products as roofing, decks, wall constructions
and a variety of other applications to provide structural efficiency.
[0013] An additional object of the invention is to maintain said arcuate structural ribbon-like
stress sections in their original shape under stress by the circular configuration
of said projections converting load stresses, which would tend to straighten said
sections, into hoop stresses around said projections, thereby resisting said tendency
to straighten said sections.
[0014] A further object of the invention is to isolate any reduction in material thickness
to substantially within the formed area of the configurations themselves. This leaves
optimum material in the stress-sustaining sections located where maximum section properties
can be developed.
[0015] A further object of the invention is to provide repeated blockage of clear lines
of sight across said sheet in all directions. This is accomplished by several embodiments
of patterns of projections, which are paired to form the elongated configuration,
such as when the projections formed in a sheet of material are combined in groups
of four and arranged in a rhombus pattern of a structurally strategic dimensional
relationship between the diameter of said projections and the centre-to-centre distance
therebetween, and adjacent rhomboidal patterns are positioned in a close perpendicular
basket weave orientation. Said basket weave orientation in a structurally strategic
geometic pattern also is produced by rows of pairs of equally-spaced in-line projections
being interwoven perpendicularly with other such rows of pairs in a basket weave fashion,
so that the portions of a centre line of a row of pairs of projections that lies between
two aligned pairs bisects the pairs thereof in transverse rows, as shown by dotted
lines in Figure 8 and also provides sufficient pattern density to block straight lines
of clear vision repeatedly in all directions across said sheet to form a one-piece
rigid structural member capable of resistance to flexure. Similarly, blocking is accomplished
by arranging a plurality of configurations in close proximity to each other within
the pattern in which certain of_said configurations resembling a figure 8 are combined
with others which are circular in cross-section, at least a major portion of the circumference
of all projections are circular in plan view with the combinations of said configurations
and projections in said sheet being such as to repeatedly block straight lines of
clear vision across said sheet. Finally, blockage is accomplished by including at
least one drawn section formed from the original planar sheet in the same direction
as said configurations, said drawn section having an area larger than said configurations
surrounding said pattern. The arrangements of said configurations, projections and
drawn section are designed so as to repeatedly block clear lines of vision across
said sheet. The blocking of clear lines of sight repeatedly across said sheet provide
a structural member of increased resistance to flexure due to increased structural
efficiency, and when combined with a planar top sheet becomes an economical composite
structural unit of substantially greater strength than one in which lines of clear
vision are present around which the structural unit can be flexed.
[0016] Still another'object of the invention is to provide the location of said configurations
and projections in such a manner that a composite unit which is resistant to flexure
is substantially isotropic, whereby said unit when penetrated by an opening of limited
cross-section located inward from the edges is resistant to flexure due to the resulting
stresses in said unit when under load being redirected around said opening. This provides
a unit which can be utilised as an access floor panel or other wall panel uses in
which ready penetration can be made without significant reduction in the structural
integrity of the unit in order to provide penetrations for cables, pipes, or other
accesses as needed in the construction industry.
[0017] One further important-object-of the invention is to combine any of the previously
described patterns of configurations and projections in a structural member with a
flat sheet of structural material of similar size and shape and fixedly connect the
upper ends of said projections to said flat sheet to form a composite structural panel
in which said sheet of said panel is disposed uppermost in use, thereby forming load-carrying
composite structures usable in many industrial applications.
[0018] A still further object is utilisation of this composite structural member in the
fabrication of access floor panels wherein the perimeter of said structural member
has the outer edge portions formed at right angles to said member to provide a continuous
bracing flange around the panel of a given finite size to provide a panel which can
be selectively supported at the edges or corners thereof-and whichcan accept substantial
uniform or concentrated loads, such as those seen in access flooring applications.
[0019] A still further object of the invention is to provide an integral perimeter lip bent
outward from said peripheral bracing flange to provide an additional connection between
said member and said top sheet which is utilised as a stiffened lip by which the access
floor panel can be selectively supported at the corners or along the perimeter to
devdop an access floor system in combination with pedestals and/or stringers.
[0020] A still further object of the invention is to provide said peripheral bracing flange
with a greater transverse depth relative to said intermediate portion of said structural
member between said projections, and in which said depth is greater than the height
of said configurations and projections and a portion extending in the opposite direction
from said configurations and projections and another portion extending in the same
direction as said configurations and projections to provide a perimeter of increased
strength and resistance to flexure, especially when utilised as an access floor panel
without the use of secondary members, such as stringers or more complicated panel-to-panel
hard connecting devices to prevent edge-to-edge movement.
[0021] Another object is to form said structural member in such manner that all surfaces
of said configurations and projections and the junctures thereof with said intermediate
structural stress sections in the original plane of said sheet are free from sharp
edges or bends thereby there are no areas or portions in said sheet which comprise
corners or other shapes which normally tend to pucker or otherwise resist formation
of smoothly stretched areas when formed from planar sheets and subjected to shaping
by dies.
[0022] One further object of said invention is to provide a structural member which can
be combined with a similar member and fixedly connected, end-to-end, to provide a
composite core structure which can be utilised in industrial application, especially
where high strength-to-weight ratio properties are desired and which do not necessarily
require a flat planar sheet. Flat planar sheets may be added to this composite structure
if 3esired.
[0023] Various other objects, features and attendant advantages of the present invention
will be more fully appreciated as the same becomes better understood from the following
detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings
in which like reference characters designate like or corresponding parts throughout
the several views, and wherein:-
Figure 1 is a plan view of a fragment of a structural member embodying the principles
of the present invention in which one embodiment of dome-like pairs of projections
combined with a saddle portion resembling a figure 8 in plan view are formed, said
figure illustrating diagrammatically broken lines tracing arcuate structural stress
sections of said member, which are ribbon-like.
Figure 2 is a fragmentary vertical sectional view of the structural member shown in
Figure 1, as seen on the line 2-2 thereof.
Figure 3 is a fragmentary sections view similar to Figure 2 but showing the cross-section
of the member shown in Figure l, as seen on the line 3-3 thereof.
Figure 4 is a fragmentary sectional view of a panel embodying the structural member
shown in Figures 1-3 but to which a fragmentarily illustrated section of a top planar
sheet has been affixed and said illustration being on a larger scale than in the preceding
figures.
Figure 5 is a fragmentary vertical sectional view similar to Figure 4 but illustrating
another embodiment of reinforcing flange from that shown in Figure 4.
Figure 6 is a fragmentary bottom plan view of a corner of the panel illustrated in
Figure 4 but shown on a smaller scale than employed in said Figure.
Figure 7 is a view similar to Figure 6 but showing a corner of the panel illustrated
in Figure 5 and using a smaller scale than employed in Figure 5.
Figure 8 is a bottom plan view of one embodiment of structural panel and in which
a pattern of the embodiment of configurations shown in Figure 1 combined with a plurality
of projections circular in plan view is illustrated.
Figure 9 is a fragmentary vertical section illustrating a pair of the structural members
of the embodiment illustrated in Figures 1-3 disposed in bottom-to- bottom relationship
in which the outermost ends of the projections of said members abut and are connected
t together.
Figure 10 is a fragmentary diagrammatic plan view similar to Figure 1 and in which
additional embossed ribs have been formed in the arcuate structural ribbon-like stress
sections of the structural member in transverse relationship.
Figure 11 is a fragmentary vertical sectional view illustrating on a larger scale
than in Figure 10 a sectional elevation of the embossed rib arrangement shown in Figure
10, as viewed from the line 11-11.
Figure 12 is a fragmentary exemplary plan view of still another embodiment of an arrangement
of configurations formed in a structural member similar to the embodiments previously
illustrated in Figure 1.
Figure 13 is a fragmentary vertical sectional view shown on a larger scale than in
Figure 12 but illustrating a portion of the structural member shown in Figure 12,
as seen on the line 13-13 thereof.
Figure 14 is a fragmentary sectional view of a structural unit similar to Figure 4
but in which the bracing flange is shown abutting the top sheet adaptable for direct
connection thereto.
Figure 15 is a view similar to Figure 14 but in which the depth of the flange is greater
than the height of the projections.
Figure 16-is a fragmentary plan.view of a further embodiment similar to Figure 1 but
in which additional protrusions are included within the stress sections.
Figure 17 is a fragmentary sectional view as seen on line 17-17 of Figure 16.
[0024] The most important part of the present invention comprises a one-piece structural
member formed from a sheet of industrial material which preferably comprises metal,
such as steel, for example, but for certain applications of the invention, other industrial
material, such as certain plastics, may be employed. Particularly when made from metal,
a sheet of such industrial materials is subjected to appropriate punches and dies
respectively for forming a plurality of any one of a number of different shapes, kinds,
and patterns of confugurations and projections, details of which are described hereinafter,
said configurations and projections preferably extending from one surface of the sheet
of material and all the upper ends of said configurations and projections preferably
being substantially within the same plane. Except for the integral edge construction
which may be formed simultaneously from within said sheet, all surfaces of the major
portion of the sheet are smoothly curved and are free from sharp angles or bends which
otherwise would comprise corners or other shapes which normally tend to pucker or
resist formation of smoothly stretched areas when formed from a planar sheet and subjected
to shaping by such punches and dies. Except for the possibility of forming a limited
number of holes or openings in the sheet, such as for the transmission of air in certain
applications of the invention, the formed sheet is substantially imperforate.
[0025] To provide an understanding of certain terms used in the specification and claims
of this application, the following definitions are set forth:-
1. Stress section - The portion of the structural member between the projections designed
to withstand tensile and compressive stresses.
2. Structuraliy strategic geometric pattern - the dimensional relationship and orientation
of projections in which the following five major characteristics are strategically
interrelated:-
(1) depth of projection for needed section modulus and moment of inertia;
(2) diameter of projections to obtain needed depth;
(3) distance between the centrelines of projections for adequate top sheet support;
(4) strategic positioning of projections to repeatedly block clear lines of vision
throughout the member;
(5) remaining bottom surface material adequate to perform as a stress member and also
provide necessary section modulus and moment of inertia.
3. Structural unit - a nut of two or more members, which when combined provide a substantial
increase in section modulus and strength-to-weight ratio over these same properties
of the individual members.
4. Substantially hemispherical dome-like projections - projections having radiused
contours in all directions of one or a combination of radii to provide arches for
top sheet support and to develop optimum height for increased section modulus.
5. Fixedly secured - any means causing two members to work together as a composite
unit, such as welding, riveting, use of structural adhesives, direct fusion or other
known methods.
6..Optimisation of support - providing specific density of projections in a base sheet
of material, such that they prevent localised indentation of the top sheet when used
as a composite unit, providing frequency of load transfer from the top sheet to the
structural member and minimising top sheet thickness while optimising strength-to-weight
ratio of the unit.
. 7. Straight lines of vision - visible longitudinal openings providing direct open
paths through a composite section around which the section can bend or flex and through
a member around which the member can flex. Increased frequency of blockage is directly
proportional to increased resistance to flexure.
8.-Rhombus pattern - geometric pattern of an equilateral parallelogram having oblique
angles wherein the centres of the projections are located at corners of a rhombus.
9. Basket weave orientation - the combination of patterns of pairs of projections
or-elongated configurations interlaced or intermeshed and in which one pattern is
perpendicular to an adjacent pattern so that a straight line of sight therebetween
is intercepted, thus providing a unique pattern of location and density for sufficient
top sheet support and optimum strength-to-weight ratio.
10.Saddle portion - material unrestrained by the die during pressing, located between
two dome-like projections in an elongated configuration, which is unrestricted at
the original plane of the member, and is naturally stretched down between the projections
usually to a depth less than, but may be equal to, the depth of the projections. When
depth of the saddle portion is made equal to the depth of projections as when formed
with a die, the saddle portion provides additional top sheet support.
11. Elongated configuration - a combination of two or more projections with the saddle
portion extending between said projections, and resembling at least a figure 8, peanut-like
in shape.
12.Arcuate structural stress members - stress members between said projections of
the sheet, sinuous in shape and held in their configuration when under stress by the
circular ends of the projections acting to resist deformation and tendency to straighten.
13. Continuous bracing flange - the edge termination of a member of finite size and
perpendicular thereto which provides continuous built-in means of edge stiffening.
14. Peripheral lip - the return of the outermost edge portion of the continuous bracing
flange to dispose it in the same plane as the terminal ends of said projections and
when affixed to a top sheet provides a means of selectively supporting a panel at
the corners and/or edges thereof.
15. Greater transverse depth - additional depth provided at the edge termination of
a member of finite size, said depth being deeper than said projections and providing
added edge stiffness.
16. Isotropic - load-resisting properties of a composite unit having substantially
the same values when measured along axes in all directions and which is substantially
free from directional weakness when the unit is penetrated by holes, cut-outs, and
the like.
17. Structural efficiency - the efficient design and utilisation of structural components
in such a way as to permit the use of shallower sections and thinner materials in
lieu of deeper sections and heavier materials while developing equal or better moment
of inertia and/or more balanced section modulus. Relative structural efficiencies
of two units expressed as a percentage, said units under the same load and support
conditions is determined by the following formula:-

18. Hoop stress - tensile or compressive stress in a circular member acting circumferentially.
Because of symmetry of the member, there is no tendency for any part of the circumference
to depart from the circular form under load as long as the hoop stress remains below
the yield point of the material.
19. Directional weakness - appreciable loss of strength in a structural unit caused
by planes of flexural weakness that are developed by penetration of said structural
unit and around which planes the unit readily flexes relative to flexure in other
directions.
20. Strength-to-weight ratio - ratio of the mathmatical product of deflection times
mass for one unit compared to the same ratio for a second unit. The strength-to-weight
ratio is used to determine minimum weight consistent with the geometry of the unit
required to maintain the integrity of the unit to resist flexure. Relative strength-to-weight
ratios of two units expressed as a percentage, said units being under the same load
and support conditions, is determined by the following formula:-

[0026] Referring to Figure 1, there is shown therein a fragmentary section of a sheet 10
of structural material, which initially is planar and the same is subjected to a set
of dies to form therein a plurality of projections 12 which, as will be seen from
Figures 2 and 3, are dome- shaped, are substantially hemispherical in cross-section,
arranged in'pairs and connected by a saddle portion 38 which as shown in cross-section
in Figures 2 and 3 does not usually project as far from the original plane of sheet
10 as the pair of projections 12. From Figure 1 it will be seen that the resulting
elongated configuration 40 in plan view closely resembles a figure 8, peanut-like
shape. This arrangement provides one embodiment of configurations which adapts itself
to being disposed in patterns, such as shown in one examplary manner in Figure 1,
in which said configurations are in close relationship to each other, the end of one
configuration 40 interfits with the adjacent configurations 40, thereby repeatedly
blocking straight lines of vision laterally in all directions across sheet 10. Further,
said projections which form the pairs which resemble a figure 8 are arranged in said
sheet in a structurally strategic geometric pattern of which rows of pairs of equally-spaced
in-line projections are interwoven perpendicularly in basket weave fashion, andas
further illustrated diagrammatically by broken lines in Figure 8, the portions of
a centreline of a row of pairs that lies between two aligned pairs bisecting the pairs
thereof in rows transverse thereto. Said projections are spaced a limited distance
from each other so as to provide therebetween sections of the original sheet which
are arcuate as indicated by the exemplary somewhat sinuous diagrammatic line 14, which
outlines the intermediate continuous planar structural ribbon-like stress sections
16 of the original sheet 10.
[0027] It will also be observed from Figure 1 that the projections 12 are arranged in said
sheet in such manner that only a limited number, such as pairs of evenly-spaced projections,
are disposed in what might be considered a straight line.and, preferably, the projections
are disposed in patterns in which a preferred arrangement, such as perpendicular basket
weave configuration, shown diagrammatically in Figure 8, which also constitutes rhombus
configurations denoted by the diagrammatic figures 18 as shown in Figure 16, which
in turn, extend between the centres of the projections 12. It will also be seen that
said patterns touch each other at points, whereby the illustration clearly shows the
relatively saturated occurrence of the projections 12 within the sheet 10, while at
the same time, permitting the occurrence of the intermediate stress sections 16 between
the individual, adjacent projections 12. Most importantly, however, it will be seen
that the patterns 18 of the projections 12 comprise a structurally strategic geometric
pattern of a density which repeatedly blocks straight lines of clear vision in all
directions across the sheet and thereby, in accordance with a major objective of the
present invention, this feature provides maximum rigidity to the structural member
comprising sheet 10 with the configurations 40 and projections 12 formed therein due
to the inter-relationship of the diamter of the projections and the centre-to-centre
distance between adjacent projections.
[0028] Another advantage of forming the projections 12 in dome-like configuration of a thickness
no greater than that of the original sheet is that the same are readily capable of
being formed to a substantial height from the original plane of the sheet 10 in which,
for example, the intermediate stress sections 16 are disposed as shown in an examplary
manner in Figure 4 and also in Figure 5, whereby the uppermost portions of the projections
12 are thinner than the lower portions thereof, while the intermediate stress sections
16 preferably retain optimum naterial, thereby providing maximum stress-resisting
capabilities. Further, the formed structural member comprising the sheet 10 with the
configurations 40 formed therein may be produced by a simple form die arrangement.
rhe shape of the projections 12 also is capable of being Formed without rupture or
shearing and, if desired, the resulting product may be imperforate. However, particularly
when the structural member is employed in either a structural unit or finished structural.panel
through which, Eor example, cable cut-outs or the like are desired, the structural
member per se may be provided with suitable openings of limited diameter in appropriate
locations through both the intermediate stress sections 16 or the outer ends, for
example, of the projections 12, when desired, without detracting from the stress-resisting
capabilities of the structural member, due to the isotropic properties of the unit.
[0029] In most applications of the invention, the structural member comprising the sheet
10 and the configurations 40 formed therein is combined with a second planar sheet
20. Due to the fact that the upper ends of the projections 12 are substantially within
a common plane, when the sheet 20 is abutted commonly with said outer ends of the
projections 12, it may be secured to said upper ends by any appropriate means, such
as welding, rivets, industrial adhesives, direct fusion, or any other known means
of suitable nature, by which the planar sheet 20 is fixedly connected to said projections
12. This results in producing a structural unit which finds a most useful application
when formed into a composite panel, several preferred embodiments of which are illustrated
fragmentarily respectively in Figures 4 and 5 in vertical section and, correspondingly,
and respectively in Figures 6 and 7, in which fragmentary corners of a composite structural
panel 22 of one embodiment, and a second embodiment 24 thereof, as shown in bottom
plan view.
[0030] To form said composite panel, the edges of a finite shape and size of the sheet 10
with the configurations therein are bent upwardly at a right angle to form a reinforcing
bracing flange 26 which has the same vertical dimension as the height of the projections
12 and, additionally, in the embodiments shown in Figures 4-8, the terminal edge portion
of the bracing flange 26, which is continuous around all four sides of the composite
panel, is bent outwardly at a right angle thereto to form preferably a continuous
lip 28, the upper surface of which is in a plane common with that of the upper ends
of the projections 12, whereby the second planar sheet 20 commonly abuts the upper
surface of the lip 28 and the upper ends of all of the projections 12, it being understood
that the planar sheet 20 also will be of substantially the same finite shape and size
as that of the embodiment of structural member 30 to which it is fixedly connected.
[0031] As can be visualised from the illustration of the occurrence of the configurations
40 within the sheet 10 of the structural member 30, especially as seen from Figure
1, there is very frequent support afforded the second planar sheet 20, whereby a sheet
of substantially reduced thickness may be utilised and still permit the same to afford
resistance to indentation even by localised loads when applied to the planar sheet
20 of the composite structural panel 22 and the structurally strategic geometric pattern
which embodies the unique relationship between the diameter of the projections and
the centre-to-centre distance therebetween so as to provide increased resistance to
deflection relative to strength-to-weight ratio and structural efficiency, even when
subjected to substantial loads of either a uniform or concentrated nature.
[0032] Referring to Figures 5 and 7, the composite structural panel 24 shown therein is
similar to the panel shown in Figures 4 and 6, except that the bracing flange 32 thereof
is of a greater depth than the height of the projections 12 of the configurations
40 and is formed by means of depressing the peripheral sections 34 of the additional
embodiment of structural member 36 from the remaining portions of the basic sheet
10 in a direction opposite to that from which the projections 12 extend, thereby producing
a portion which extends oppositely to projections 12 and wherein said bracing flange
32 extends in the same direction as the projections 12 and is of greater vertical
dimension than the flange 26 in the embodiment of Figure 4. The resulting composite
structural panel 24, shown in Figures 5 and 7, particularly adapts this embodiment
of structural panel to provide support, especially by the corners thereof. This eliminates.the
need for supporting stringers between suitable pedestals, which, for example, are
required in an elevated floor such as a so-called access floor in which a plurality
of such structural panels are employed as floor panels and, under which circumstances,
many available structural panels presently in use do not have the required rigidity
along the edges thereof.
[0033] Notwithstanding the fact that the intermediate stress sections 16 of the embodiments
of the invention shown in the foregoing figures are arcuate and somewhat sinuous in
plan view, said stress sections are maintained in said configuration and are capable
of not being moved therefrom when subjected to stress due to the fact that the circular
configuration of the projections 12 in cross-section converts load stress to hoop
stress adjacent to the opposite sides of said stress section. It is well known that
a circular hoop is the strongest configuration for resisting deformation from its
original shape when forces are supplied radially around the circumference thereof.
As can be seen, especially from Figure 1, the arcuate intermediate stress sections
16 extend substantially around all sides of the circular projections 12 and thereby
utilise the hoop stress property of such projections advantageously for the stated
purpose with respect to the t stress sections 16.
[0034] Further, the major portion of the perimeters especially the perimeters of the opposite
end portions of the configurations 40, are circular in plan view, thereby providing
the aforementioned hoop stress which serves to maintain the intermediate stress sections
16. This is represented by the diagrammatic lines 14 in Figure 1 which illustrate
the sinuous shape thereof even when the sheet 10 is subjected to loads.
[0035] A more comprehensive concept of the several embodiments of composite panels is represented
and illustrated in the several embodiments shown in the preceding figures. Attention
is directed to Figure 8, in which the composite structural panels 22 and 24 are shown
in bottom plan view, which correspond to the fragmentary vertical sections thereof,
respectively, shown in Figures 4 and 5.
[0036] Referring now to Figure 10, in which a fragmentary portion of the structural sheet
10 is specifically shown with elongated configurations 40 formed therein, the arcuate
intermediate stress sections 16 may have the effectiveness thereof increased by forming
in at least certain of said sections 16 an additional embossed rib 56, several of
which are illustrated in an exemplary manner in Figure 10, and also in cross-section
in Figure 11, the latter figure being on a larger scale than that used in Figure 10.
The embossed ribs 56 generally follow the shape of the arcuate, ribbon-like intermediate
stress sections 16. Although only a pair of the ribs 56 are shown in outline pattern
in Figure 10 in intersecting relationship, it is to be understood that any desired
number of such additional reinforcing ribs may be employed, as desired, especially
in relation to the rigidity required, commensurate with the thickness of the sheet
10 and the shape and spacings of the projections extending therefrom.
[0037] Still another embodiment of patterns of projections which may be employed in accordance
with the principles of the invention is illustrated in Figures 12 and 13, in which
a fragmentary section of a sheet of structural material 10 is shown, and this particular
illustration embodies a mixture of different shapes of configurations and projections
which are more extensively illustrated in certain of the preceding figures, and also
the circular configurations 12, which similarly, are illustrated more extensively
in certain of the preceding figures.
[0038] In addition to these previously described configurations and projections, however,
the embodiment shown in Figures 12 and 13 also include a still further projection
comprising a section 58, which is drawn from the original plane of the structural
sheet 10, the drawn section 58 being of the same depth with respect to sheet 10, as
the configurations 40 and the projections 12, the same being surrounded in a pattern
of such projections and configurations but in a manner so that the entire pattern
repeatedly blocks straight lines of clear vision between any of the sides of the structural
member when viewed along a plane parallel to the intermediate stress sections 16.
[0039] Still another embodiment of the invention is illustrated in Figures 14 and 15 with
regard both to structural members 30 and 34 and similar structural members 42 and
44, as well as to the composite structural panels 22 and 24 in which they respectively
are included. This embodiment comprises terminating the bracing flanges 26 and 28
in these respective structural members and composite structural panels at the upper
ends and omit the lips 28 thereon, thus butting the upper ends of the flanges directly
against the adjacent surfaces of the top planar sheets 20 in said members and panels
and connecting said upper ends of the flanges fixedly to the perimeters of saiƦ top
planar sheets which also terminate at the vertical plane of the outside surfaces of
said bracing flanges, as clearly shown in Figures 14 and 15. Under such circumstances,
when the structural panels thus formed are used in an access floor, the outer surfaces
of said bracing flanges of adjacent' panels closely interfit in the overall access
floor.
[0040] Still a further embodiment of the invention is illustrated in Figures 16 and 17,
and similarly to the embodiment illustrated in Figures 10 and 11, increases the effectiveness
of the arcuate intermediate stress sections 16. Specifically, additional protrusions
60 are formed in stress sections 16 between configurations 40 and of less height than
projections 12. As previously discussed in reference to Figure 8, projections 12 are
positioned in a manner that form rhombus configurations denoted by diagrammatic figures
18. The additional protrusions 60 are preferably positioned in the centre of the squared
areas 62 between the rhombus patterns 18 and are sized so as to retain a planar portion
of each stress section 16, said portions being located between protrusions 60 and
projections 12 forming the corners of the squared areas 62. The acceptance of tension
and compression stresses by stress sections 16 are, therefore, substantially unaffected
by the inclusion of protrusions 60 since the stresses are resisted by being distributed
around the protrusions 60. At the same time, the section modulus of the meet can be
increased with an attendant gain in rigidity.
[0041] The embodiment of Figures 16 and 17 can be advantageous in specialised applications
requiring a small but, nevertheless increased rigidity of the embodiment of Figure
8, but could be undesirable if the application was such that an increased section
depth was undesirable. By way of emample and with reference to Figure 14, if protrusions
60 were formed in stress sections 16 and extended from the sheet in a direction opposite
to the projections 12, the increased thickness of the sheet might render it undesirable
in those installations requiring small clearance between sub-floor and panel.
[0042] From the foregoing, it will be seen that the present invention provides a plurality
of embodiments of structural members and composite structural panels which include
the same and in which such panels are relatively of light weight and embody optimisation
of support by utilising the most effective strength-to-weight ratio and structural
efficiency and embodying maximum resistance to deflection, as well as resistance to
indentation of the planar top sheet of such panels due to the frequency of structural
support therefor by projections in the structural members included therein. For maximum
support of the planar sheets 20 by projections 12 in the sheet 10, it will be seen
in the various illustrated embodiments that additional single projections not comprising
parts of pairs thereof or of the basket weave patterns or rhombus configurations are
included in the sheets 10 and are similar to the projections in the patterns thereof
to occupy areas of sheet 10 which would otherwise not offer desired support to the
planar sheets 20 of the composite structurs and structural units of the invention.
[0043] To demonstrate the significantly improved characteristics and performance of the
present invention, comparisons have been made with access floor panels disclosed in
prior art and which are commercially available. Comparisons have been made on a "strength-to-weight"
basis, and a "structural efficiency ratio" basis, both described more fully below.
Of existing prior art panels, there are some which have comparable resistance to flexure
when loaded either at the centre of the panel and/or at the mid-span of the perimeter,
but which require significantly greater material by weight and/or depth of section.
For prior art panels to have comparable performance, they would require additional
material and/or greater depth of section, through demonstrating lower structural efficiency
which is needed to develop required moment of inertia. By combining material mass
weight savings, thinner depth of section, and deflection performance, the panels of
the present invention demonstrate a marked improvement in actual structural efficiency.
In some instance, the improvement is in excess of 150%.
[0044] Strength-to-weight ratio, in the context of the present invention, is used to related
deflection under a given load to the mass weight of the material. Expressed as the
followinq formula:

the result is a numerical performance ratio, expressed as a percentage of access floor
unit#l (prior art) to access floor unit-#2 (present invention).
[0045] Data employed in the formula for the present invention is an average of 3 random
samples taken from a test run, and data for panels of the prior art is derived from
sample panels available on the market.
[0046] The "structural efficiency ratio" is a comparative ratio that relates deflection,
mass weight, and section depth. In essence, it is a measure of the efficiency of the
panel section in its utilisation of the mass of the material. Expressed as the following
formula:

the result is a numerical structural efficiency ratio, expressed as a percentage of
access floor unit #1 (prior art) to access floor unit #2 (present invention). As before,t
the data employed in the formula for the present invention is an average of three
sample panels taken from a test run and the data for the prior art panel is derived
from sample panels available on the market.
[0047] The test method was identical for all panels tested. Three panels were selected at
random from a test run of panels of the present invention and were tested along with
commercially available sample panels available on the market. Each panel was placed
on rigid pedestal supports without the use of edge stringers. Concentrated loads of
identical magnitude were applied to the centre of the panel and at mid-span of the
perimeter. Deflection readings were recorded from the bottom of the panel directly
under the load. All panels were reloaded with deflection recorded again. On each loading
sequence, the permanent set was also recorded.
[0048] The following chart expresses relative "strength-to-weight" and "structural efficiency"
ratios. The differences in these parameters are stated as a percentage improvement
of the performance-of panels of the present invention. Note that the present invention
had performances superior to prior art panels and/or panels presently available on
the market. As a base, the average weight of the panels of the present invention was
20 1/4 lbs.
[0049] As can be seen from the data, the present invention demonstrates a dramatic improvement
in structural efficiency and strength-to-weight ratios over all available prior art
panels and panels currently being marketed. The present invention offers a reduction
in material usage over all panels to which it was compared. It provides improved resistance
to flexure when loaded and utilised as an access floor panel.
[0050] The foregoing specification illustrates preferred embodiments of the invention. However,
concepts employed may, based upon such specification, be employed in other embodiments
without departing from the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the following claims
are intended to protect-the invention broadly, as well as in the specific forms shown
herein.

1. A structural member comprising a one-piece rigid member of structural material
having formed therefrom a plurality of similar dome-like projections extending from
the plane of said sheet and of which at least a major portion of the configuration
of each projection is circular in plan view, said projections being arranged in pairs
connected by a saddle portion forming an elongated configuration which in plan view
generally resemble a figure 8, and said elongated configurations being arranged in
a substantially perpendicular basket weave pattern having a strategic dimensional
relationship between the diameter of said projections and centre-to-centre distances
therebetween and of which, in plan view, the end of one configuration interfits with
adjacent configurations, thereby repeatedly blocking straight lines of vision laterally
in all directions across said sheet, said one-piece rigid member being capable of
resistance to flexure. and wherein portions of said member which are intermediate
said configurations comprise continuous structural ribbon-like stress sections of
fluctuating width and which are arcuate in plan-view and capable of optimising stress-resisting
integrity of said structural member.
2. The structural member according to Claim 1 in which the projections which form
the pairs resembling a figure 8 are arranged in a structurally strategic geometric
pattern in which rows of equally spaced pairs of in-line projections are interwoven
perpendicularly with other such rows of pairs in a basket weave fashion so that the
portion of a centreline of a row of pairs of projections that lies between two aligned
pairs bisects the pairs thereof in transverse rows and has sufficient pattern density
to block straight lines of clear vision repeatedly in all directions across said sheet.
3. The structural member according to Claim 1 in which at least a majority of said
projections in plan view are also combined in groups.of four arranged in a rhombus
pattern and adjacent rhombus patterns are positioned in a close perpendicular basket
weave orientation, thereby locating said projections to repeatedly block said clear
lines of vision as aforesaid.
4. The structural member according to Claim 1 in which stiffening protrusions are
formed in said sheet within the areas between said rhombus patterns of projections
to a depth less than the depth of said projections.
5. The structural member according to Claim 1 wherein said configurations are in close
proximity to each other within said pattern and in which additional projections, circular
in cross-section, are combined in said sheet so as to repeatedly block straight lines
of clear vision across said sheet in all directions through said pattern of configurations
and projections.
6. The structural member according to Claim 5 further including at least one section
drawn from the original planar sheet in the same direction as said configurations
from said sheet, said sections having an area larger than said configurations and
surrounded in said pattern by additional projections, circular in plan view, and wherein
the arrangements of said configuration projections and drawn section of said entire
pattern are designediso as to repeatedly block straight lines of clear vision across said sheet in all
directions through said pattern.
7. A composite structural unit comprising a one-piece rigid structural member of structural
material having formed therein a plurality of similar dome-like projections of no
greater thickness than said sheet and extending from the plane of said sheet and of
which at least the major portion of the circumference of each projection is circular
in plan view, the majority of said projections being arranged in pairs connected by
a saddle portion forming an elongated configuration which in plan view generally resembles
a figure 8 and said elongated configurations being arranged in a substantially perpendicular
basket weave pattern having a strategic dimensional relationship between the diameter
of said projections and centre-to-centre distances therebetween and of which, in plan
view, the end of one configuration interfits with adjacent configurations, combined
with additional projections circular in cross-section, thereby repeatedly blocking
straight lines of vision laterally in all directions across said sheet to form said
one-piece rigid structural member being capable of resistance to flexure and wherein
portions of said member which are intermediate said configurations comprise continuous
structural ribbon-like stress sections of fluctuating width and which are arcuate
in plan view and capable of optimising stress-resisting integrity of said structural
member such that sections extending between opposite edges of said sheet are capable
of maintaining resistance of the load stresses throughout said structural member and
also capable of being mainta ined in the stated shape thereof when under stress by
the circular configurations of said projections preventing movement thereof; and a
planar sheet fixedly secured to the outer terminal ends of said projections and connected
to said structural member, thereby forming said composite structural unit in which
the optimisation of support versus strength-to-weight ratio and structural efficiency
is achieved, whereby when said planar sheet is subjected to loading, said projections
serve as arches to resist flexure and the-hemispherical shape of said projections
providing resistance to collapse thereof.
8. The structural unit according to Claim 7 in which the pattern of said projections
and the formation thereof from said sheet produce s resistance to flexure in said
structural unit which is substantially isotropic when said unit is penetrated by an
opening of limited cross-section located inward from the edges thereof, thereby substantially
retaining its resistance to flexure without directional weakness due to the resulting
stresses in said unit when under load being redirected around said opening.
9. The structural unit according to Claim 7 in which at least the majority of said
projections in plan view are also combined in groups of four arranged in a rhombus
pattern with adjacent rhombus patterns being positioned in close perpendicular basket
weave orient ation, thereby locating said projections to repeatedly block said clear
lines of vision as aforesaid.
10. The structural unit according to Claim 9 further comprising stiffening protrusions
formed in said sheet within the areas between said rhombus patterns of projections
to a depth less than the depth of said projections.
11. The structural unit according to Claim 7 further comprising at least one drawn
section formed from the original planar sheet in the same direction as said configurations
from said sheet, said at least one section having an area larger than said configurations
and surrounded in said pattern by additional projections, circular in plan view, the
arrangement of said configurations projections and drawn section of said entire pattern
being designed so as to repeatedly block straight lines of clear vision across said
sheet in all directions through said pattern.
12. The structural unit according to Claim 7, further comprising a rib extending from
within said arcuate members to further increase the rigidity of said structural unit
to resist flexure under stress.
13. The structural unit according to Claim 7 wherein said structural unit is of a
given finite size and further comprising portions of said original planar material
including a peripheral edge extending at right angles to said planar material to form
a continuous bracing flange around the periphery of said structural unit, and means
fixedly connecting said planar sheet to said bracing flange wherein upper surfaces
of upper ends of said projections form a rigid panel constructed to be supported sdectively
at the edges or corners thereof which is capable of sustaining substantial uniform
or concentrated loads without appreciable deflection or permanent set.
14. The rigid panel according to Claim 13 in which said peripheral bracing flange
has a greater transverse depth than the height of said projections and said peripheral
bracing flange providing a perimeter of increased strength, said perimeter having
one portion extending in the opposite direction to said projections relative to the
original plane of said sheet and further comprising an additional portion extending
in the same direction as said projections from said original plane of said sheet.
15. The rigid panel according to claim 13 wherein outer extremities of said edge portions
of said formed bracing flange are also bent outward at a right angle to said flange
to form a peripheral lip parallel to the plane of said intermediate portions of said
member between said projections, and further comprising means fixedly connecting said
peripheral lip to said planar top sheet.
16. The rigid panel according to Claim 14 in which said additional portion terminates
in a flange bent outward at a right angle to said additional portion to form a peripheral
lip parallel to the plane of said intermediate portions of said member between said
projections, and further comprising means fixedly connecting said peripheral lip to
said planar top sheet.
17.. The structural member according to Claim 1 wherein all surface of said configurations
and the junctures thereof with said intermediate structural stress sections in said
original plane of said sheet are free from sharp angles or bends, whereby there are
no areas or portions in said sheet which comprise corners or other shapes which normally
tend to pucker or otherwise resist formation of smoothly stretched areas when formed
from a planar sheet and subject to shaping by dies.
18. The structural member according to Claim 1 further comprising a second structural
member wherein outer ends of said projections of each of said structural member are
fixedly attached to form a composite structural unit capable of resistance to flexure
with said projections serving as arches to resist flexure and hemispherical shape
of said projections providing resistance to collapse thereof.
19. The sheet of structural material according to Claim 1 wherein said structural
material comprises steel.
20. The structural unit according to Claim 7 wherein said structural material and
said planar sheet comprise steel.
21. The structura 1 unit according to Claim 20 in which said planar sheet is secured
to said outer terminal ends of said projections by welding.