[0001] The present invention relates to a magnetic brush development apparatus for use in
electrophotographic copying apparatus or electrostatic recording apparatus.
[0002] The magnetic brush development apparatus is an apparatus for attracting a developer
containing magnetic powder therein to a non-magnetic support member in which magnets
are disposed, and for bringing the developer into contact with a latent electrostatic
image bearing member at an image development section in order to develop the latent
electrostatic image. The name of the magnetic brush comes from that the developer
becomes like a brush due to the magnetic force of the magnets disposed in the non-magnetic
support member.
[0003] As the developer that can be employed in the magnetic brush development apparatus,
there are a two-compenent type developer comprising non-magnetic toner and magnetic
carrier, and a one-component type developer consisting of magnetic toner. The one-component
type developer can be classified into an electrically conductive toner and an electrically
insulating toner.
[0004] Image development is performed by the toner charged to the opposite polarity to that
of a latent electrostatic image being electrostatically attracted to the latent electrostatic
image. In case of the two-component type developer, the particle size of toner is
smaller than that of carrier particles and the toner is triboelectrically charged
so that the toner clings to the carrier and a magnetic brush is formed. In the one-component
type developer, the electrically conductive toner is charged by injection of charges
or by electrostatic induction, while the electrically insulating toner is triboelectrically
charged by some member of a developer container with which the toner contacts or during
the transportation of the toner.
[0005] In case of the two-component type developer, the toner is securely charged, but some
means for maintaining the mixing ratio of the toner and the carrier or the toner concentration
is necessary in order to obtain a developed image of a predetermined image density.
In contrast to this, in case of the one-component type developer, it is unnecessary
to control the toner concentration and simple in handling the toner although the charging
of the toner is not always sufficient.
[0006] A sleeve-shaped or cylindrical member and an endless belt- shaped member are known
as the non-magnetic support members for forming a magnetic brush thereon by attracting
the developer thereto. Plural magnets arranged in a radial manner and a single rod
magnet having magnetic poles on the peripheral surface thereof are known as the magnets
to be disposed in the non-magnetic support member. The photoconductors for use in
electrophotographic copying apparatus and the dielectric member for electrostatic
recording apparatus are known as the latent image bearing members. The shapes of the
latent image bearing members are drum-like, endless-belt-like, plate-like and sheet-
like.
[0007] Either or both of the non-magnetic support member for holding the magnetic brush
thereon and the magnets disposed inside the non-magnetic support member are moved
relative to each other, so that the magnetic brush formed on the non-magnetic support
member is moved on the non-magnetic support member. The latent image bearing member
is also moved at a predetermined speed and the magnetic brush on the non-magnetic
support member comes in contact with the surface of the latent electrostatic image
bearing member at a predetermined position where the non-magnetic support member and
the latent electrostatic image bearing member comes closest to each other, namely
at a development section, so that the latent electrostatic image on the latent image
bearing member is developed continuously.
[0008] The magnetic brushes on the non-magnetic support member are formed along the lines
of magnetic force distributed on the non-magnetic support member 1 among the magnets
2, 3, 4 and 5 which are disposed in the non-magnetic support member as shown in Fig.
1. In Fig. 1, the distribution of the magnetic lines of force among only the magnets
2, 3 and 4 are shown. Each line of magnetic force starts from the magnetic pole N
and returns to the magnetic pole S, and the magnetic field is strongest at each magnetic
pole. The magnetic brush becomes highest at each magnetic pole and lowest between
two adjacent magnets. The magnetic brush stands out at each magnetic pole as shown
by reference numeral 6 in Fig. 2. Therefore, normally, the magnets are arranged so
that each magnetic pole of the magnets is located in the development section and development
is performed by the highest portion of the magnetic brush.
[0009] Generally, the image density of development image depends upon development time.
The development time here means a period of time in which developer is in contact
with a latent electrostatic image bearing member. Therefore, in the magnetic brush
development apparatus, the development time is a period of time in which the magnetic
brush is in contact with a latent electrostatic image bearing member at the development
position.
[0010] As mentioned previously, since the latent image bearing member is moved at a predetermined
speed, the period of time in which the magnetic brush is in contact with the latent
image bearing member is related to the contact width w of the magnetic brush in contact
with the latent image bearing member. Therefore, the development efficiency, namely
the image density of developed image per unit time can be increased by broadening
the contact width w.
[0011] A one of the conventional techniques for making the contact width w great, an apparatus
is known in which a plurality of non-magnetic support members for supporting the magnetic
brush thereon are disposed in close proximity to the surface of a latent electrostatic
image bearing member, whereby the contact width w can be substantially increased.
However, the apparatus has some shortcomings that the appartus is oversized and expensive.
In order to eliminate such shortcomings, it is necessary to increase the contact width
w by a single non-magnetic supporting member.
[0012] In the magnetic brush development apparatus as shown in Fig. 2, the contact width
w of the magnetic brush is related to a gap d in the development section between a
latent electrostatic image bearing member 7 and a non-magnetic support member 1 since
the magnetic brush stands out at each magnetic pole. The contact width w is greater
in the bottom portion of the magnetic brush than in the top portion of the magnetic
brush. Therefore, the smaller the gap d, the greater the contact width w.
[0013] However, there is a limitation in reducing the gap d, since the smaller the gap d,
the greater pressure the toner receives at the gap d, so that blocking of the toner
occurs by the toner being solidified under the pressure. When the blocking of the
toner occurs, the solidified toner scratches the latent electrostatic image or the
surface of the latent image bearing member. Therefore, in order to increase the development
efficiency, it is important to reduce the gap d to the extent that blocking of the
toner does not occur.
[0014] Since the gap d is related to the contact width w and accordingly to the development
time, images with an uneven density are formed when the gap d changes during development.
[0015] In the conventional magnetic brush development apparatus, a spacer roller is disposed
between a non-magnetic sleeve and a photoconductor in order to maintain a minimum
gap d.
[0016] However, as-mentioned previously, since there is a limit in increasing the development
efficiency by reducing the gap d, it is necessary to increase the contact width w
by some other method for raising the development efficiency. Furthermore, it is known
that the image density is not varied when the contact width w is large enough even
if the gap d is changed to some extent. Therefore, it is more advantageous to increase
the contact width w by some method.
[0017] As another method of increasing the contact width w, there is proposed a method of
increasing the width of the magnet in the development section. However, the larger
the magnet, the greater the magnetic flux density and the stronger the magnetic brush,
which may cause a risk of disturbing the latent image on the phontoconductor when
the surface of the photoconductor is brushed by the strong magnetic brush.
[0018] As a further method of increasing the contact width w, there is known a method of
disposing two magnets 8 and 9 with a space therebetween and with their magnetic poles
arranged in the same direction in the development section as shown in Fig. 3. In this
method, a magnetic field is formed so as to have a peak of magnetic field intensity
right above the two magnets 8 and 9, so that the contact width w of the magnetic brush
6 with the photoconductor 7 is increased in comparison with the conventional magnetic
brush development apparatus as shown in Fig. 4. However, this method has the following
shortcomings in comparison with the above-mentioned convential methods. Namely, more
magnets are necessary, and the assembling of the apparatus is more difficult, and
since the magnetic fields of the two magnets are directed oppositely inbetween the
two magnets, the magnetic toner or the magnetic carrier existing on the portion above
the space between the two magnets is magnetized in the polarity opposite to that of
the magnetic toner or the magnetic carrier in the other portion, so that the chainlike
arrangement of the toner or the carrier is interrupted by the two magnets. The oppositely
directed magnetic fields of the two magnets 8 and 9 are shown in Fig. 5, in which
the lines of magnetic force starting from the N pole are directed to the S pole in
the respective magnets 8 and 9, so that the lines of magnetic force staring from the
respective N poles are oppositely directed.
[0019] In the magnetic brush development process of a magnetic brush development apparatus,
the development force can be represented by the following formula:

where F represents the development force, and Fc represents the electrostatic attraction
of a photoconductor for attracting the developer thereto, and F
M represents the magnetic attraction for attracting the developer magnetically in the
magnetic brush development apparatus.
[0020] From the above formula, it can be seen that the magnetic attraction F serves as a
negative bias with respect to the development force in the magnetic brush development
apparatus. Referring to Fig. 14, there is shown a development characteristic of the
magnetic brush development, by employing the magnetic attraction F
M as a parameter, with the amount of toner deposition M as ordinate and surface charge
Q of a photoconductor as abscissa. The solid line indicates a development characteristic
when the magnetic attraction F
M is comparatively small while the broken line indicates a development characteristic
when the magnetic attraction F is comparatively great. In either case, the development
time is set constant. As can be seen from Fig. 14, when the magnetic attraction F
is small, the toner deposition begins to the saturated even if the surface charge
Q is comparatively small. Accordingly, uneven development hardly occurs. Furthermore,
when the magnetic attraction F
M is set small, the amount of toner deposition M during a predetermined development
time becomes greater than that in the case where the magnetic attraction F
M is set great and accordingly, the development time can be shortened in comparison
with that in the case of a great magnetic attraction F
M when an equal amount of toner deposition is required. However, when the magnetic
attraction F
M is set small, background appears in the copy and sharpness of image is lowered, so
that setting the magnetic attraction F at a low level has an adverse effect on the
image quality.
[0021] It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a magnetic brush development
apparatus capable of eliminating the above-mentioned shortcomings of the conventional
magnetic brush development apparatus. In the magnetic brush development apparatus
of the present invention, a magnet disposed in a non-magnetic support member can generate
a magnetic field having a plurality of peaks in the distribution of the intensity
of the magnetic field and has substantially one magnetic pole portion in the development.section.
[0022] Another object of the invention is to provide a. magnetic brush development apparatus
having an excellent development efficiency with uneven development obviated by broadening
the width of a magnetic brush which is in contact with a latent electrostatic image
bearing member.
[0023] A further object of the invention is to provide a magnetic brush development apparatus
whole construction is simple and which can be assembled easily.
[0024] According to the invention, in a magnetic brush development apparatus having a non-magnetic
sleeve and a magnet disposed inside the non-magnetic sleeve for producing a magnetic
field on the outer peripheral surface of the non-magnetic sleeve, the magnet has substantially
one magnetic pole portion capable of producing a magnetic field having a plurality
of peaks in the intensity of the magnetic field and the peaks located upstream of
the movement of a latent electrostatic image bearing photoconductor are lower than
the peaks located downstream of the movement of the latent electrostatic image bearing
photoconductor.
[0025] For a better understanding of the invention as well as other objects and further
features thereof, reference is made to the following detailed description of the invention
to be read in conjuction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
Fig. 1 is a schematic microscopic sectional view of the formation of a magnetic brush
in a conventional magnetic brush development apparatus.
Fig. 2 is a schematic macroscopic sectional view of the magnetic brush of Fig. 1.
Fig. 3 is a schematic microscopic sectional view of the formation of a magnetic brush
in another convential magnetic brush development apparatus.
Fig. 4 is a schematic macroscopic sectional view of the magnetic brush of Fig. 3.
Fig. 5 is a partially enlarged view of the magnetic brush of Fig. 3.
Fig. 6 is a schematic sectional view of a magnet for the present invention.
Fig. 7 is a schematic sectional view of another magnet for the present invention.
Fig. 8 shows the distribution of the intensity of magnetic field of each of the magnets
of the present invention compared with that of a conventional magnet.
Fig. 9 is a schematic sectional view of a further magnet for the present invention.
Fig. 10 shows the distribution of the intensity of the magnetic field produced by
the magnet of Fig. 9.
Fig. 11 is a schematic enlarged sectional view of the formation of the magnetic brush
of the present invention.
Fig. 12 is a schematic macroscopic sectional view of the magnetic brush of the present
invention as when the magnetic brush is stationary.
Fig. 13 is a schematic macroscopic sectional view of the magnetic brush of Fig. 12
as when the magnetic brush is moved.
Fig. 14 is a graph of a development characteristic of a magnetic brush development
apparatus by use of the magnetic attraction as a parameter.
Fig. 15 is a schematic sectional view of a further embodiment of a magnetic brush
development apparatus of the present invention.
Fig. 16 is an enlarged schematic sectional view of a main portion of the magnetic
brush development apparatus of Fig. 15.
Fig. 17 is a graph showing the distribution of the intensity of magnetic field on
the surface of a non-magnetic sleeve in which the magnet of Fig. 15 is employed.
Fig. 18 is an enlarged schematic sectional view of a main portion of a further embodiment
of a magnetic brush development apparatus of the invention.
Fig. 19 is a graph showing the distribution of the intensity of magnetic field on
the surface of a non-magnetic sleeve in which the magnet of Fig. 18 is employed.
Fig. 20 is an enlarged schematic sectional view of a main portion of a still further
embodiment of a magnetic brush development apparatus of the invention.
Fig. 21 is a graph showing the distribution of the intensity of magnetic field on
the surface of a non-magnetic sleeve in which the magnet of Fig. 20 is employed.
[0026] Referring to Fig. 6, there is shown a magnet for one embodiment of a magnetic brush
development apparatus of the present invention. In Fig. 6, a magnet 11 having a flat
concave portion of the magnet 11 is disposed under a non-magnetic supporting element
10. The opposite end portions of the magnet 11 are projected. Referring to Fig. 7,
a magnet 12 has a curved concave portion in the central portion thereof and accordingly
the opposite end portions of the magnet 12 are projected towards the non-magnetic
supporting element 10. The distribution of the intensity of magnetic field of the
magnets having a concave portion in the central portion thereof is shown in Fig. 8.
In Fig. 8, the long and short dash line indicates the distribution of the intensity
of magnetic field of a conventional flat magnet, which has one peak of the intensity
of magnetic field, while the solid line indicates the distribution of the intensity
of the magnetic field of the magnets of the present invention, which has two peaks
of the intensity of the magnetic field. The shape of the curve having two peaks of
the intensity of magnetic field depends upon the size of the concave portion formed
in the magnet. Namely, when the width a of the concave portion of the magnet is constant
and the depth b of the concave portion is changed, the greater the depth b, the greater
central dropping of the curve of the intensity of magnetic field, and when the depth
b is constant and the width a changes, the greater the width a, the lower the two
peaks. When the ratio a : b is 4 : 1, the distribution of the intensity of magnetic
field is shown by the solid line 14 and, when the ratio a : b is 4 : 2, the distribution
of the intensity of magnetic field is shown by a broken line 15.
[0027] In the above-mentioned examples of the magnets, only one concave portion is formed
in each magnet. However, plural concave portions can be formed in one magnet, so that
the distribution of the intensity of magnetic field can be changed. For example, referring
to Fig. 9, there is shown a magnet 16 which has two concave portions, each of which
has a width a and a depth b. When the width of the opposite bank-like portions of
the magnet 16 is C
1 and that of the central bank-like portion of the magnet 16 is C
2 and the two concave portions and the bank-like portions are formed with the size
ratio of a : b : C 1 C
2 being 2 : 2_: 2 : 4, the distribution of the intensity of magnetic field becomes
like a curve indicated by the broken line 17 in Fig. 10. As can be seen from Fig.
10, in contrast to the distribution of the intensity of magnetic field of the magnet
having one concave portion, the curve of the distribution of the intensity of magnetic
field is a broad curve having a small and uniform central dropped portion. Furthermore,
by changing the shape of the magnet, the distribution of the intensity of magnetic
field of the magnet can be changed so as to have three or more peaks. Thus, according
to the invention, a different distribution of the intensity of magnetic force can
be formed on the non-magnetic support member by changing the shape of the magnet.
[0028] The magnets for the present invention can be made by various methods. The simplest
method is to mold a ferromagnetic material and magnetize it and form a concave portion
in the thus made magnet as desired by a diamond cutter. Another method is to form
a desired concave portion in a ferromagnetic material first and to magnetize it later.
A further method is to join together magnets or cause a ferromagnetic material to
adhere to the projecting portions of a magnet. In the above-mentioned examples, the
magnets are composed of pieces of magnets. However, one magnetic rod with predetermined
concave portions at desired magnetic pole portions can be used as well. In any of
the magnets of the present invention, since the lines of magnetic force generated
from its N pole are distributed perpendicularly to and all over the non-magnetic support
member 10, the magnetic toner or the magnetic carrier on the non-magnetic support
member is magnetized uniformly in the same direction as shown in Fig. 11, so that
a stable magnetic brush is formed on the non-magnetic support member.
[0029] The magnetic brush of the present invention is gently sloping at the magnetic pole
portions when the non-magnetic support member 10 and the magnet 11 are stopped. However,
when the intensity of the magnetic force is distributed with a peak in each end portion,
the magnetic brush is divided into two as shown in Fig. 12 by a slight shock due to
the gradient force of the magnetic field gradient. However, the two divided magnetic
brushes are made into one magnetic brush as the non-magnetic support member 10 or
the magnet 11 is moved since the variation of the magnetic field intensity is continuously
effected over the magnetic toner or the magnetic carrier on the non-magnetic support
member as shown in Fig. 13. The thus formed magnetic brush has a small toner density
and the blocking of toner does not occur when the development gap is narrowed.
[0030] In Fig. 15, there is schematically shown a further magnetic brush development apparatus
according to the present invention. In Fig. 15, reference numeral 21 represents a
non-magnetic sleeve which is rotated counterclockwise. In the non-magnetic sleeve
21, there is disposed a magnet 22. Part of the non-magnetic sleeve 21 faces a drum-
shaped latent electrostatic image bearing member or a photoconductor drum 23 with
a predetermined space therebetween. The magnet 22 has a magnetic pole, for instance,
an N pole, facing the surface of the photoconductor drum 23 through the non-magnetic
sleeve 21 in a development section, so that a magnetic field is formed in the development
section on the non-magnetic sleeve 21. A magnet (not shown) for transporting developer
is incorporated in the non-magnetic sleeve 21. As is enlarged in Fig. 16, in the magnetic
pole portion of the magnet 22, there is formed a groove 24 which is eccentrically
located closer to the surface of the photoconductor drum 23. Viewed from the rotating
direction of the photoconductor drum 23, a first magnetic pole portion 25 is formed
in the magnet 22, upstream of the groove 24, and a second magnetic portion 26 is formed
downstream of the groove 24. The first magnetic portion 25 is broader than the second
portion 26.
[0031] In this case, due to the groove 24 formed in the magnetic pole portion of the magnet
22, a magnetic field having two peaks in the distribution of the intensity of the
magnetic field is obtained, and the magnetic flux density of the second magnetic pole
portion 26 is higher than that of the first magnetic pole portion 25 as can be seen
from the distribution of the magnetic force on the non-magnetic sleeve 21 in Fig.
17.
[0032] Therefore, in developing a latent electrostatic image on the photoconductor drum
23, firstly the developer is deposited uniformly on the latent electrostatic image
by the comparatively weak magnetic field produced by the first magnetic pole portion
25 which is located upstream in view of the rotation of the photoconductor drum 23,
and secondly the latent electrostatic image is completely developed by the comparatively
strong magnetic field produced by the second magnetic pole portion 26 which is located
downstream of the first magnetic pole portion 25, whereby a high quality image with
a uniform image density and without background can be obtained.
[0033] In Fig. 18 there is shown partially an enlarged schematic sectional view of a further
embodiment of the present invention. In Fig. 18, in the magnetic pole portion of the
magnet, there is formed a first magnetic pole portion 27 which is formed with a predetermined
first space away from the outer peripheral surface of the non-magnetic sleeve 21,
and a second magnetic pole portion 28 with a second space away from the out peripheral
surface of the non-magnetic sleeve 21. The first space is greater than the second
space, so that the second magnetic pole portion 28 constitutes a stepped end portion
of the magnetic pole portion of Fig. 18. In this case, the first magnetic pole portion
27 is located upstrem of the second magnetic pole portion 28, viewed from the rotation
of the photoconductor drum 23.
[0034] In this embodiment, the intensity of the magnetic field is distributed as shown in
Fig. 19, so that the effect similar to that of the embodiment of Fig. 16 can be .
obtained.
[0035] In Fig. 20, there is shown partially an enlarged schematic sectional view of a still
further embodiment of the present invention. In the magnetic pole portion of the magnet
of this embodiment, there are formed two grooves 39 and 30 which are spaced away from
each other, and a first magnetic pole portion 31, a second magnetic pole portion 32,
and a third magnetic pole portion 33 which are separated by the two grooves 39 and
30. Of the three magnetic pole portions 31, 32 and 39, the first and second magnetic
pole portions 31 and 32, which are located upstream of the third magnetic pole portion
33, are equally spaced away from the outer peripheral surface of the non-magnetic
sleeve 21, while the third magnetic pole portion 33 is located closer to the non-magnetic
sleeve 21 than the first two magnetic pole portions 31 and 32. In this embodiment,
the curve of the intensity of the magnetic field has three peaks as shown in Fig.
21. Of the three peaks of the intensity of the magnetic field, the peak existing most
downstream of the rotation of the photoconductor drum 23 is the highest, which indicates
the greatest magnetic force. In this embodiment, the developer is deposited uniformly
on a latent electrostatic image on the drum 23 by the comparatively weak magnetic
field of the first and second magnetic pole portions 31 and 32 and the latent image
is then completely developed by the comparatively strong magnetic field produced by
the third magnetic pole portion 33.