[0001] The present invention relates to alkaline cleaning compositions, particularly aqueous
alkaline compositions adapted for use in non-aerosol form and suitable for cleaning
hard surfaces such as ovens and the like.
[0002] It is known from British Patent Specification 1 297 782 to use, as oven cleaning
compositions, aqueous alkali compositions which contain caustic alkali, an alkali-stable
organic detergent active compound, and an aliphatic monohydric alcohol and which are
adapted for use in aerosol form. It is also known from United States Patent Sepcification
3 829 387 to use, as an aerosol oven cleaning composition, an aqueous alkali composition
containing caustic alkali, a glycol ether and a non-ionic detergent active compound.
[0003] We have now surprisingly discovered that particularly good cleaning results can be
achieved with a cleaning composition comprising an aqueous base containing:
( i) from about 1% to about 6% by weight of a non-ionic surfactant;
(ii) from about 1% to about 40% by weight of an alkali; and
(iii) from about 5% to about 20% by weight of a solvent.
[0004] The non-ionic surfactant is preferably a polyoxyalkylene alkyl ether such as the
"Brij"-type non-ionics. Particularly suitable examples are Brij 35 (polyoxyethylene
(23) lauryl ether) and Brij 78 (polyoxyethylene(
20) stearyl ether). The quantity of the non-ionic surfactant may be from about 1.5%
to 2.5%, preferably about 2% by weight.
[0005] The alkali is preferably a caustic alkali such as sodium hydroxide or potassium hydroxide.
Alternatively silicates such as potassium silicate with a K
20:Si0
2 weight ratio of 1:2 to 2:1. Further examples of suitable alkali materials are guanidine
(formed from guanidine hydrochloride and sodium hydroxide)and mono-,di- and trialkanolamines.
The amount of alkali present is preferably from about 1 to about 10% by weight in
the case of caustic alkalis and from about 3 to about 30% by weight in the case of
an alkali metal silicate. Most preferred ranges are from about 3 to 6% by weight and
from about 4 to 10% by weight respectively.
[0006] The solvent is preferably a high boiling point solvent (i.e. having a boiling point
over about 120°C). The preferred solvents are: glycol ethers such as butyl cellusolve,
methyl, ethyl or butyl carbitol; pentaerythritol propane 1,2-diol; propylene glycol;
and dioxitol. The solvent is preferably present in the amount of from about 5% to
about 15%, most preferably about 10% by weight.
[0007] Other ingredients may be present in the compositions of the invention..A hydrotrope
may be added up to an amount of about 18% by weight, preferably from about 6% to 12%
by weight. The hydrotrope may be selected from alkali metal aryl sulphonates, such
as sodium xylene sulphonate, the latter also aiding soil penetration by the composition.
A thickening agent may also be present, in an amount up to about 2% by weight, preferably
about 0.4% by weight. The thickening agent enables the product to cling better to
vertical surfaces and reduces mist on spraying the neat product. Suitable thickening
agents include hydroxyethyl cellulose (Natrosol - Registered Trade Mark), lauryl alcohol,
stearyl alcohol, magnesium sulphate, sodium carbonate and sodium chloride, hydroxypropylcellulose
(Klucel - Registered Trade Mark), acrylate-methacrylate polymer (Latekoll - Registered
Trade Mark) or mixtures of these with hydroxyethyl celluloses. The preferred amount
of thickening agent is up to about 2% by weight in the case of an organic thickener,
more preferably about 0.4% by weight and up to 6% by weight in the case of an inorganic
thickener, more preferably about 1 to 3% by weight.
[0008] The preferred thickener is a cellulose based nonionic polymer especially the sterically
hindered natrosol type>. These give much better viscosity stability witn time in these
formulations.
[0009] Further optional ingredients in the cleaning compositions of the invention include
dyes and humectants.
[0010] The invention will now be illustrated, purely by way of example, with reference to
the following nonlimiting examples, in which parts and percentages are by weight,
unless otherwise stated.
EXAMPLES 1 TO 4
[0011] Cleaning compositions were made up according to the following table:

[0012] A number of prior art formulations approximately according to the following table
were prepared:

[0013] Examples 1 to 4 were compared with the prior art formulations A to G for detergency
efficiency. The evaluation was based on the average base reflectance measurements
(R 460*) on a number of soiled white test plates. The reflectance measurement on a
clean plate was 69.7. The results were as follows:

EXAMPLES 5 TO 13
[0014] The formulations set out in the following table were prepared.
