[0001] This invention relates to a process for preparing electrodes for the anodic oxidation
of sulfur dioxide and of the type in which and a platinum group metal- containing
catalyst solution is coated onto a high-surface-area porous substrate and dried thus
forming a -film on the substrate surface.
[0002] Of all of the advanced concepts proposed for the large scale production of hydrogen,
the process described in U.S. Patent 3,888,750 (Brecher and Wu), appears to be the
most economical. That process is a two-step cycle which decomposes water with the
hydrogen being generated in an electrolyzer and the oxygen being generated in a separate
step in a thermochemical apparatus. Sulfur dioxide is electrochemically oxidized at
a relatively low temperature (less than about 150°C) to produce sulfuric acid on the
anode while hydrogen gas is simultaneously generated on the cathode. The sulfuric
acid is then catalytically reduced at higher temperatures (generally above 870°C)
into sulfur dioxide and oxygen. Subsequently, the sulfur dioxide is recycled as a
reactant in the first step. The use of sulfur dioxide as an anode depo- larizer reduces
the thermo-dynamic reversible voltage of an electrolyzer from 1.23 volts (for the
conventional electrolysis of water) to only 0.17 volts.
[0003] While the sulfur cycle reduces the electric power required in electrolysis, it has
been found that conventional electrode coating processes have not resulted in uniform
coatings of a catalyst on the porous substrates. Such non-uniformity has resulted
in increased electrode voltage at a given production rate and thus a loss of efficiency.
[0004] Accordingly the present invention resides in a process for preparing electrodes for
the anodic oxidation of sulfur dioxide and of the type in which a platinum group metal
containing catalyst solution is coated onto a high-surface-area porous substrate and
dried, thus forming a film on the substrate surface, characterized by:
a) applying a solution containing at least one platinum group metal to a first side
of said substrate;
b) applying a pressure differential of at least 10 mm-Hg across said substrate with
said first side of said substrate being the higher pressure side; and
c) uniformly heating at least one side of said substrate.
[0005] Desirably, a pressure differential of 100-100 milli-meters of. mercury is applied
across the substrate and the latter is radiantly heated.
[0006] In order that the invention can be more clearly understood, convenient embodiments
thereof will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying
drawings in which:
Figure 1 shows a block diagram illustrating the sulfur cycle hydrogen generation system
in which the electrode made by the process of this invention can be used;
Fig. 2 is a diagram of an electrolytic cell (electrolyzer) in which the electrode
fabricated by this process can be used;
Fig. 3 is a cross-section of a substrate holder and substrate in which a vacuum is
used to produce the pressure differential;
Fig. 4 is a cross-section of a substrate holder and substrate where positive pressure
is used to produce the pressure differential;
Fig. 5 shows the appearance of a commercially available platinum-coated carbon electrode;
Fig. 6A shows the general appearance and Figure 6B shows a scanning electron micrograph
of a typical carbon substrate prior to coating by the method of this invention; and
Fig. 7A illustrates the general appearance and Figure 6B shows a scanning electron
micrograph of a resulting electrode prepared by the process of this invention.
[0007] The sulfur cycle hydrogen generation system of Fig. 1 is a typical use of the sulfur
dioxide oxidation electrode of this invention. In Figs. 1 and 2, an electrolyzer 1
contains an aqueous solution of sulfuric acid 2 which is saturated with 50
2. Direct current is applied to the solution through an anode 3 (made by the process
described herein) and a cathode 4. Sulfuric acid and hydrogen gas are generated at
the anode 3 and the cathode 4, respectively. Inlets 5 and 6 are provided for the addition
of more dilute sulfuric acid and additional sulfur dioxide. The hydrogen product leaves
by outlet 7 where it separates from the sulfuric acid. Unconsumed sulfur dioxide leaves
by outlet 8 with the more concentrated sulfuric acid solution, and both are recycled.
A portion of the sulfuric acid from outlet 8 passes to vaporizer 9 where water is
evaporated and its concentration is increased. The concentrated sulfuric acid then
passes to oxygen generator 10 where the sulfuric acid is heated over a catalyst, for
example, of platinum or vanadium pentoxide, to decompose it into water, sulfur dioxide,
and oxygen which pass to oxygen recovery unit 11. In oxygen recovery unit 11, the
sulfur dioxide is separated from the oxygen by lowering the temperature to condense
the sulfur dioxide into a liquid. The sulfur dioxide and the water are then returned
to inlet 6 of the electrolytic cell 1, thus completing the cycle. A hydrogen-ion-permeable
membrane 12 separates the fluid around the anode 3 from the fluid around the cathode
4.
[0008] Cyclic voltammetric studies have revealed that the anodic oxidation of sulfur dioxide
is highly irreversible. The overvoltage on the anode contributes a significant proportion
to the overall potential of an electrolyzer, and thus is one of the major sources
of efficiency loss in the cell. Methods to reduce the anode overvoltage include the
use of appropriate electrode catalyst and the maximization of active surface areas
of the electrode. To maximize the surface area, are electro-catalysts supported on
highly porous substrates (electrodes made completely of a palladium, for example,
rather than as a palladium coating on a substrate would, of course, be extremely expensive).
Carbon substrates formed from extremely fine carbon powder provides a porous substrate
with a very high'. surface area (a specific surface area of at least 200 and typically
about 450 square meters per gram). The appearance and microstructures of a typical
carbon (plate) substrate are illustrated in Fig. 6. These inexpensive carbon substrates
provide good porosity, electrical conductivity and mechanical strength. While anodes
of carbon (graphite) catalyzed with fine platinum particles -have been used for preparation
of sulfuric acid from sulfur dioxide, commercially available platinum-coated carbon
electrodes have been found to have an extremely non-uniform coating of platinum. All
such electrodes had, as shown in Fig. 5, areas which were clearly uncoated.
[0009] Early experiments to improve the uniformity of catalyzed carbon plate electrodes
which, like the commercially available electrodes, when visually inspected, had little
or no catalyst in the center. When these electrodes were disected, there was also
little or no catalysts on interior surfaces. In this early work, the aqueous solution
of noble metal compound (such as dihydro-
'gen hexachloroplatinate or palladium acetate) was applied to the surface of a porous
carbon substrate by painting. The substrate doped with catalyst was slowly dried in
a furnace at about 50°C. The resultant non-uniform coatings may have been caused by
the pressure of the water vapor in the pores increasing during the evaporation process
and gradually repealing the solution out of the pores (the aqueous solution also apparently
migrated toward low temperature regions at the edges).
[0010] In order to avoid the problems of those early techniques, a new method was developed
in which.a pressure differential across the substrate was used to push solution through
the substrate and radiant heating of one side of the substrate was used to heat the
substrate uniformly (note that uniformity on the surface and on planes parallel to
the surface is a critical but that temperature differences through the thickness of
the material - e.g. between planes parallel to the surface - can be tolerated).
[0011] The invention will now be illustrated with reference to the following Example:
EXAMPLE
[0012] A, A five by five centimeter porous carbon substrate (mean pore size approximately
nine microns) was activated by oxidation in a concentrated nitric acid (13.5 normal
at 80°C) .
[0013] B. 0.255 grams of palladium acetate was dissolved in 30 milliliter of distilled water
and the solution was then heated at 80°C for 30 minutes.
[0014] C. The oxidized carbon substrate 13 was mounted (as shown in Fig. 3) in a lucite
holder 14 using a seal around the perimeter of the substrate. The substrate was then
positioned in a horizontal plane with its underside exposed to a cavity 18 that was
connected to a vacuum pump.
[0015] D. A small amount of solution was poured onto the upper side of the substrate and
the vacuum was applied to maintain a pressure differential of approximately 10 millimeters
of mercury across the substrate 13. The substrate 13 was heated in situ to 40-60°C
using an overhead infrared lamp 20 (palladium acetate was thus uniformly deposited
over the electrode 13 as the solution filtered through the pores). This treatment
(adding solution, applying pressure differential, and reheating) can be repeated to
increase the thickness of compound applied.
[0016] E. After the deposition of palladium acetate was completed, the thermal decomposition
process was performed in a nitrogen or hydrogen atmosphere at 600°C for 2 hours, which
resulted in the formation of a thin layer of palladium completely covering the electrode
surface (as shown in Fig. 7, the density of palladium particles is high and the distribution
is uniform).
[0017] When a palladium-oxide electrode is to be used, the palladium-covered carbon substrate
prepared as above is further treated, for example, at a temperature of 400-500°C in
a stream of helium gas containing 5% oxygen.
[0018] While the electrode is preferably heated from above (as apparently the solution being
applied tends to migrate towards lower temperature regions), the substrate could be
heated from below, as shown in Fig. 4. Fig. 4 also illustrates the use of a positive
pressure cavity 22 (as opposed to the vacuum cavity of Fig. 3) as a means for applying
the pressure differential across the substrate 13. Whether heated from above as in
Fig. 3, or below as in Fig. 4 (or both as can be done by sticking a radiant heating
source in either the vacuum cavity 18 of Fig. 3 or the pressure cavity 22 of Fig.
4) or whether the pressure differential is applied by a positive pressure or by a
vacuum (or both), it is critical that one uses a pressure differential to uniformly
move the solution through the substrate.
[0019] Experiments in which uniform heating alone was used (a variation of the above process
without a pressure differential), failed to produce uniform coatings. When a pressure
differential was used with non-uniform heating, poor results were obtained. Only by
using both the uniform heating and the pressure differential were even coatings obtained.
Although uniform heating in an oven was accomplished experimentally, oven heating
tended to be non-uniform unless extreme care was taken and radiant heating is preferred.
[0020] Again with reference to Fig. 4, it should be noted that the pressure could be applied
by a pump directly to the coating solution (thus the pressure chamber 22 would be
completely filled with fluid) or by using sufficient depth of solution to provide
the pressure hydrostatically. Neither of these techniques, however, lend themselves
to radiant heating from the side to which the solution is applied and thus the arrangement
of Fig. 3 is preferred.
[0021] It has been found that at least ten millimeter of mercury's differential pressure
is required to move the fluid through the substrate at a practical rate and that the
differential pressure should be less than about 100 millimeters of mercury if carbon
substrates are used to avoid damage to the substrate. Preferably a differential pressure
of 10-30 millimeters of mercury is used with carbon substrates. Other types of substrates
(e.g. a sub-. strate sintered from finely divided titanium powder) can also be used
and the upper limit of the pressure differential is determined by the strength of
the substrate. As . described in the aforementioned copending application, the palladium
or palladium oxide catalyst is preferred (although other platinum group of metals
can also be uniformly deposited by the techniques described herein) and palladium
is preferably deposited using radiant heating to 40-60°C.
[0022] In U.S. Patent Application S.N. 084,494 entitled "Palladium Electrode For Use In
Sulfur Cycle Hydrogen Operation Process", filed October 15, 1979, there is described
a palladium electrode for use in the anodic oxidation of sulfur dioxide. The use of
a palladium catalyst rather than the platinum provides for a significant voltage reduction
and therefore a greatly increased electrolyzer efficiency. The process of the present
invention can be used to fabricate the palladium electrode of this copending application.
1. A process for preparing electrodes for the anodic oxidation of sulfur dioxide,
and of the type in which a platinum group metal containing catalyst solution is coated
onto a high-surface-area porous substrate and dried, thus forming a film on the substrate
surface, characterized by:
a) applying a solution containing at least one platinum group metal to a first side
of said substrate;
b) applying a pressure differential of at least 10 mm-Hg across said substrate with
said first side of said substrate being the higher pressure side; and
c) uniformly heating at least one side of said substrate.
2. A process according to claim 1, characterized in that the differential pressure
across the substrate is 10-100 mm-Hg.
3. A process according to claim 2, characterized in that the differential pressure
is 10-30 mm-Hg.
4. A process according to claim 3., characterized in that the substrate is radiantly
heated.
5. A process according to claim 4, characterized in that the platinum group metal
is palladium and the substrate is radiantly heated to 40-60°C.