Field of Invention
[0001] The invention relates to an improved Raneyized hydrogen evolution cathode for chlor-alkali
electrclytic cells.
Prior Art Statement
[0002] In view of the phenomenal jump in energy costs and the increased scarcity of industrial
fuel supplies, there has been and continues to be a flurry of research activity in
the electrolysis field to find ways to reduce the amount of power used in electrolysis
processes. For many years it has been customary to use steel cathodes in chlor-alkali
diaphragm cells, even though a substantial amount of power is used in overcoming what
is called "hydrogen overvoltage" at the cathode. Hydrogen overvoltage is largely an
inherent characteristic of the metallic surface in contact with the electrolyte so
there is a continual need and desire to come up with better cathode surfaces to reduce
this overvoltage and thereby decrease the power consumption of the cell.
[0003] It is known that active, porous nickel can be produced by selectively dissolving
a soluble component, such as aluminum or zinc, out of an alloy of nickel and the soluble
component. A porous nickel of this type and the alloy from which it is produced are
generally called "Raney nickel" or "Raney alloy" after their inventor. See U.S. Patent
Nos. 1,563,787 (1925), 1,628,191 (1927) and 1,915,473 (1933). There are various methods
for producing this Raney nickel, and various applications for this metal are known.
[0004] It is also known to use such Raney nickel surfaces on cathodes for chlor-alkali cells.
For example, U.S. Patent No. 4,116,804 filed November 17, 1976 and issued September
26, 1978 to C. Needes and assigned to DuPont de Nemours describes an electrode, hereafter
"Needes electrode", for use as a hydrogen evolution cathode in electrolytic cells
in which a cohesive surface layer of Raney nickel is in electrical contact with a
conductive metal core having an outer layer of at least 15 percent nickel (see Table
4 thereof), characterized in that the surface layer of Raney nickel is thicker than
75 µm and has a mean pcrosity of at least 11 percent. The catalytic surface layer
consists predominantly of Ni
2Al
3 grains from which at least 6a percent of aluminum has been leached out with an aqueous
base. An overvoltage of about 60 millivolts is alleged. To phrase the same thing relative
to conventional cathodes, reductions of 315 to 345 millivolts in hydrogen overvoltage
as compared with mild steel cathodes is alleged. However, subsequent testing indicates
much higher overvoltages and actual reductions of only 100-150 millivolts. Furthermore,
spalling or delamination of the coating has been observed upon additional testing.
The patent teaches that any Raney nickel which forms from the NiAl
3 phase is mechanically weak and does not adhere well and is generally lost during
leaching. The patent also teaches that Ni
2Al
3 (Gamma phase) is the preferred intermetallic precursor and governs the activity of
the coating and that the heat treatment should be such that the proportion of Ni
2Al
3 is maximized.
[0005] This mechanical weakness of Raney nickel from NiAl
3 is unfortunate because it was previously known that Raney Ni from NiAl
3 (Beta phase) is more active for hydrogen desorption than is Raney Ni from Ni
2Al
3 (Gamma phase). See for example A. A. Zavorin et al, Kinetika i Kataliz, Vol. 18,
No. 4, pp. 988-994, (USSR, July-August, 1977) which explains hydrogen is more weakly
"bonded" in Raney Ni from NiAl
3 than from Ni
2Al
3, that there are more hydrogen adsorption centers in Raney Ni from NiAl
3 than Ni
2A1
3 and that the heat of desorption is lower for Raney Ni from NiAl
3 than Ni
2Al
3.
[0006] Golin, Karaseva and Serykh in Elektrokhimiya, Vol. 13, No. 7, pp. 1052-1056 (USSR,
July, 1977) disclose a 10 percent
Mo, 45 percent Ni, 45 percent Al alloy which, upon leaching, yields a Raney catalytic
surface with extremely low activation energy for hydrogen oxidation such as would
occur in a hydrogen-oxygen fuel cell. No mention of hydrogen evolution (i.e. hydrogen
reduction) catalysis is given or suggested.
[0007] Austrian Patent 206,867 issued December 28, 1959 to Ruhrchemie A. G. and Steinkohlen
Electrizitat A. G. gives a detailed discussion of preparation of thin foil electrodes
with a "double-skeletal catalyst" coating of 20-80 percent Raney metal with 80-20
percent skeletal material (e.g. Ni powder;. Page 3, column 2 lists a number of sintered
powder metal alloys suitable for catalytic coatings on the foil. German Auslegeschrift
1,094,723 by W. Vielstich, E. Justi and A. Winsel-Ruhrchemie A. G. published December
15, 1960 suggests (page 3, lines 24-70) use of sucn a "double skeletal catalyst" coated
foil improved by adding (page 3, lines 54-63) 1-20 percent of a Group VIII metal as
the cathode of an amalgam decomposer of a mercury type chlor-alkali cell system. However,
such sintered coatings have been found to delaminate after relatively short use as
diaphragm or membrane cell cathodes.
[0008] Baird and Steffgen in Ind. Eng. Chem., Prod. Res. Dev., Vol. 16, No. 2 (1977) in
an article entitled "Methanation Studies on Nickel Flame-Sprayed Catalysts", describe
the temperature ranges for the various intermetallics and say NiAl
3 is the major phase produced during heat treatments for 1, 10 or 30 minutes at about
725°C and that no more than 10 minutes is required at 725°C for alloying. When heat
treated at 725°C, the alloy was found to have the greatest activity for carbon monoxide
conversion catalysis (see FIGURE 2 thereof). NiAl
3 is described as believed to be the most active intermetallic phase "as shown by Petrov
et al (1969)" and photomicrographs are provided to show the structure.
[0009] U.S. Patent No. 4,033,837 by Kuo et al issued July 5, 1977 teaches use of a Ni-Mo-V
catalytic coated copper cathode which achieves a relatively low overvoltage. while
this cathode has a significantly lower overvolzage than a steel electrode, copper-fouling
or iron-fouling can be a problem unless the catholyte solution is kept free of iron.
No mention of Raney treatment is made.
[0010] U.S. Patent No. 3,291,714 issued December 12, 1966 to Hall discloses a number of
coatings for steel or titanic cathodes, among such coatings a Ni-Mo coating and a
Fe-Ni-Mo coating were fcund most desirable. Heat treatment cf the electrodeposited
coating was required tc avoid delamination of the coatings. Moderately low overvclzages
were alleged. No mention of Raney treatment is given.
[0011] West German Offenlengungsschrift 2,704,213 published August 11, 1977 claiming priority
of U.S. Serial No. 655,429 filed February 2, 1976 by Macmullin discloses a Raney-nickel
cathode in the form of a plate or a porous Raney-Ni coated perforated nickel plate.
The cathode is designed for chlor-alkali membrane cells, but was, as stated in the
example therein, apparently only tested in "a small laboratory cell". The cathode
is prepared by creating a nickel-aluminum alloy, pouring a plate of the alloy and
then leaching out the aluminum. Molybdenum is not mentioned.
[0012] W. Vielstich in Chem. Ing. Techn., Vol. 33, pp. 75-79, (1961) describes a "dual-frame"
electrode made of Raney nickel, which is prepared by mixing a powdered
Raney alloy (e.g. of nickel and an alloying component, such as aluminum) with a frame
metal consisting of pure metal powder (e.g. carbonyl-nickel), pressing, sintering,
and then dissolving out the alloying component from which the Raney alloy is prepared.
The surface layer of such an electrode consists of a dispersion of active Raney nickel
particles, which is embedded in a frame made of inactive solid nickel particles. This
electrode is used, among other things, as a hydrogen evolution cathode in a chlorine-alkali
electrolysis diaphragm cell. Double-frame electrodes produced by the methods of powder
metallurgy, however, have insufficient mechanical strength to be suitable for producing
large mesh electrodes such as those which are desired for industrial scale electrolysis
of sodium chloride solutions.
[0013] One process for producing flat material from Raney nickel consists of the fact that
fused particles of a Raney alloy precursor (e.
g., an alloy of nickel and aluminum; are sprayed onto a metallic carrier, and the aluminum
is then selectively dissolved cut; see U.S. Patent Nc. 3,637,437. This material is
suggested as a material for catalytic cathodes of fuel cells. Cathodes produced according
to this method, however, generally have surfaces of low porosity and have a tendency
to break apart.
[0014] U.S. Patent No. 3,272,728 and German Offenlegung- sschrift No. 2,527,386 (based on
U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 489,284) describe electrodes with Raney nickel
surfaces which are produced by simultaneously electrodepositing nickel and zinc from
an inorganic electrolyte bath on a metal carrier (such as steel) and then selectively
dissolving zinc out of the Ni-Zn alloy thus produced. This electrode treatment is
supposed to reduce hydrogen overvoltage of steel cathodes by up to 150 millivolts.
U.S. Patent No. 4,104,133 issued August 1, 1978 discloses one method alleged to be
useful to put this Ni-Zn Raney coating technology into commercial practice by use
of metallic plating anodes for deliberately electroplating a Ni-Zn coating onto the
cathode in-situ in a chlor-alkali cell and subsequently leaching the zinc out to give
a Raney nickel surface and lower the hydrogen overvoltage of the chlor-alkali cell.
However, only layers of a very crude temporary Raney alloy form. Permanent coatings
of greater overvoltage reductions are desired.
[0015] British Patent No. 1,289,751 describes a process for producing porous nickel electrodes
for electrochemical cells or fuel cells by electrodeposition of aluminum from an electrolyte
containing an organoaluminum complex on a support made of nickel or a nickel alloy,
wherein some of the aluminum deposited diffuses into the nickel, forming an alloy,
from which aluminum is then leached. The diffusion is carried out over a period of
1 or 2 hours in an inert atmosphere at a temperature of less than 659°C, preferably
between 350 and 650°C. Very thin electrcdeposited layers, 5-20 pm thick are described.
[0016] J. Yasamura and T. Yoshino in a report on
"Laminated Raney Nickel Catalysts" in Ind. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev., Vol. 11, No. 3, pp.
290-293, 1972, describe the production of Raney nickel plates, though not in connection
with electrodes, by spraying molten aluminum onto a nickel plate, heating for 1 hour
in a nitrogen atmosphere at 700°C to form a 0.2 mm-thick layer of NiAl
3 and dissolving aluminum out of the layer. The product thus obtained is supposed to
be usable as a hydrogenation (i.e. hydrogen oxidation) catalyst.
[0017] Another method of preparing molded articles from Raney nickel for use as hydrogenation
catalysts is described in U.S. Patent No. 3,846,344. According to this patent, a nickel-plated
metal pipe is coated with an aluminum layer at least 0.02 mm thick, then the aluminum
is permitted to diffuse into the nickel by heat treating for at least 30 minutes at
a temperature of at least about 480°C, and then the aluminum is selectively dissolved
out of the diffusion layer. Example 5 of the patent describes how a 25 mm-diameter
pipe with a 1 mm-thick electrodeposited nickel layer, on which a 0.5 mm-thick aluminum
layer has been deposited by flame spraying, is subjected to 6 hours of diffusion heat
treatment at 650°C, in order to produce a diffusion layer at least 0.05 mm tnick.
The pipe is then activated by immersing for 8 hours in 25 percent acuecus sodium hydroxide
solution. The patent states that the surface displays a high degree of efficacy for
the catalytic hydrogenation of cyclchexane.
[0018] U.S. Patent No. 3,407,231 describes a process for producing a negative electrode
with an active porous nickel surface for use in alkaline batteries. According to the
patent, the electrode is produced by bringing aluminum into contact with the surface
of a nickel-containing core at an elevated temperature, so that nickel and aluminum
interdiffuse to form a layer of Gamma phase nickel aluminide (Ni
2Al
3), after which the aluminum which has diffused in is dissolved out with alkali hydroxide
and a layer of active nickel is obtained, which is metallurgically bonded to the core.
The patent mentions diffusion temperatures of 625 to 900°C, diffusion times of 8 to
16 hours, dissolution temperatures of 20 to 100°C, dissolution times of 1 to 32 hours,
and coating thicknesses of 200 to 300 µm. In particular, the process is supposed to
be carried out by placing a nickel sheet in a packet made of a mixture of about 58
percent Al
2O
3, 40 percent aluminum powder, and 2 percent NH
4Cl and heating the packet for 8 hours in a reducing atmosphere at 800°C, so that a
200 µm-thick layer of Ni
2Al
3 forms on each side of the nickel sheet, after which the coated nickel core is immersed
in 6 N sodium hydroxide for about 16 hours at 80°C, in order to dissolve out at least
85 percent of the aluminum. However, it has been found that Raney nickel surfaces
of electrodes produced according to this special method have low porosity. The patent
suggests that the nickel sheet be rolled between two aluminum sheets in order to produce
a metallic bond, and the sandwich be heated in a reducing atmosphere at 543°C. Although
temperatures below 649°C are preferred in this particular embodiment, the patent also
suggests temperatures of as high as 872°C. It has been found, however, that in the
case of bonding by rolling the desired metallic bond does not form.
[0019] It is an object of this invention to provide a solution to the problem of producing
a cathode for a chlor-alkali membrane or diaphragm cell which has a lower cathode
polarization potential ("hydrogen overvoltage") for a longer period than the prior
art electrodes noted above.
Summarv of the Invention
[0020] One solution is the present invention which provides an improved low overvoltage
electrode for use as a hydrogen evolution cathode in an electrolytic cell, the electrode
being of the type that has a Raney metal surface layer in electrical contact with
a conductive metal core, wherein said improvement comprises: said Raney metal surface
is predominantly derived from an adherent NiAl
3 crystalline precursory outer portion of said metal core.
[0021] Another solution provided by the invention is an improved low overvoltage electrode
for use as a hydrogen evolution cathode in an electrolytic cell, the electrode being
of the type that has a Raney metal surface layer in electrical contact with a conductive
metal core, wherein tne improvement comprises: said Rane
y metal surface layer is predominantly derived from adherent Ni
xMe
1-xAl
3 crystalline precursory surface laver, where x is less than 0.95.
[0022] A still further solution provided by the invention is an improved low overvoltace
electrode for use in a hydrogen evolution cathode in an electrolytic cell, the electrode
being of the type that has a Raney metal surface layer in electrical contact with
a conductive metal core, wherein the improvement comprises: said Raney metal surface
is derived from an adherent NiAl
3 (Beta phase) crystalline intermetallic layer stabilized by substitution of a stabilizing
amount of a stabilizing metal for some of the nickel in the crystalline structure
of said crystalline layer.
[0023] Yet another solution provided by the invention is a method of producing a low overvoltage
electrode for use as a hydrogen evolution cathode in an electrolytic cell which comprises
the steps of:
a) coating with aluminum the surface of a clean non-porous conductive base metal structure
of an alloy of 5-15 percent molybdenum and 95-85 percent nickel;
b) heat treating said coated surface by maintaining said surface at a temperature
of from 660° to 750°C for a time sufficient to diffuse a portion of said aluminum
into outer portions of said structure to produce an integral nickel-molybdenum-aluminum
alloy layer in said outer portions consisting predominantly of NiAl3 grains but insufficient to create a predominance of Ni2Al3 grains in said outer portions; and
c) leaching out residual aluminum and intermetallics from the alloy layer until a
Raney nickel-molybdenum layer is formed integral with said structure.
Brief Description of the Drawing
[0024] The invention will be better understood by reference to the attached drawing which
is provided by way of illustration and in which:
FIGURE 1 is a graph of polarization potential (ref. standard hydrogen electrode) versus
time for a number of cathodes.
FIGURE 2 is a graph of polarization potentional (ref. standard hydrogen electrode)
versus current density for two cathodes of the invention.
FIGURE 3 is a graph of polarization potential versus time for three cathodes of the
invention.
FIGURE 4 is a comparison graph of IR Free polarization potentials for the cathode
of the invention and prior art cathodes.
FIGURE 5 is a photomicrograph of the coating of a cathode of the invention showing
a predominance of Raney Ni-15 Mo formed from N.85Mo.15 Al3 Beta phase) precursor, as it appears just after the Raney treatment.
FIGURE 6 is a photomicrograph of the coating of the cathode of FIGURE 5 as it appeared
after the electrolytic test of FIGURE 1 showing the Beta phase structure still largely
intact and with essentially no iron overplating and no thinning of the coating.
FIGURE 7 is a microprobe photograph and readout showing the aluminum. Beta (NiAl3), Gamma (Ni2Al3) and nickel phase precursers prior to leaching.
FIGURE 8 is a vertical cross section tnrougn an exemplary laboratory electrolysis
cell with which the invention may be used.
Detailed Description of Preferred Embodiments
[0025] FIGURE 1 graphically shows the cathode polarization potentials using three different
Raney-treated cathodes in a typical chlor-alkali cell environment. The Raney nickel
coatings of the present invention which were produced from Beta phase (NiAl
3) precursors had 150-250 less potential than the Raney nickel from a Gamma phase (Ni
2Al
3) precursor. FIGURE 1 also shows that the Raney nickel cathode of the invention with
15 percent by weight molybdenum from a molybdenum enriched Beta phase (Ni
xMo
1-xAl
3) precursor (hereafter β-Raney Ni-15Mo) exhibited about 80 to 120 millivolts less
cathode polarization potential and hence 80-120 mV less overvoltage. Also, the β-Raney
Ni-15Mo had a constant overvoltage of approximately 60 millivolts ever the entire
seven week period shown. This is in contrast to all the other ccatings tested in FIGURE
1 which exhibited significant potential increases. As noted before, the β-Raney Ni-15Mc
did not exhibit any iron-fouling and did not have any appreciable thinning. The constant
low overvoltage level is believed to be a result of this surprisingly unexpected constant
nature of the coating during actual performance. It is seen that the mild steel sample,
which started at about 540 millivolts overvoltage (i.e. /(-0.94)-(-1.500)/volts;,
actually decreased in overpotential and then started rising. The explanation is the
overplating of iron which has been recently found by others to cause increased roughness
and hence lower actual current density and therefore lower overvcltage. It is well
known that overpotential generally decreases when current density decreases. (See
FIGURES 2 and 4). FIGURE 1 further shows that a major problem exists with prior art
Raney nickel prepared from a purely Gamma phase intermetallic structure (hereafter
G-Raney Ni). The prior art G-Raney Ni cathode exhibited both significant spalling
and iron pick-up.
[0026] FIGURES 2 and 3 show the overpotential curves versus current density and time, respectively,
for two catalytically coated cathodes of the invention, all prepared from Beta phase
precursor. Each has a different percent by weight of molybdenum (10% for Ni-lOMo,
15% for Ni-15Mo) and a different method (plasma spraying and dipping) of depositing
the aluminum prior to identical heat treatment. Dipping a Ni-15Mo substrate in molten
aluminum was found to produce, upon subsequent Raney treatment, a β-Raney Ni-15Mo
cathode having about 20-40 millivolts less cathode overvoltage than that exhibited
by a β-Raney Ni-10Mo cathode with a Ni-10Mo substrate on which the aluminum had been
plasma sprayed prior to Raney treatment. The reason for this difference is not known,
although the result was confirmed. It is believed that the difference in molybdenum
content was primarily responsible.
[0027] FIGURE 4 is a polarization versus current density graph showing the relative pverpctentials
of β-Raney Ni cathodes of the invention and prior art G-Raney Ni cathodes showing
that β-Raney Ni is initially about 60 millivolts lower in overpotential than G-Raney
Ni. Referring to FIGURE 1, it is seen that this difference increases with time.
[0028] FIGURE 5 is a 700X magnification cross-sectional view of a β-Raney Ni-15Mo coating
of the invention taken with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) showing at the bottom
the core or substrate of nickel alloy with 15% by weight molybdenum (Ni-15Mo); a 40
micron layer of the Gamma phase (from Ni
2Al
3 precursor) Raney Ni-15Mo or "G-Raney Ni-15Mo", immediately above the core and a 120
micron layer of the Beta phase (from NiAl. precursor) Raney Ni-15Mo or "β-Raney Ni-15Mo"
atop the G-Raney Ni-15Mo layer. A portion of a conventional medium in which the metal
specimen was mounted appears at the upper right hand corner. It is seen that the β-Raney
Ni-15Mo layer is three times as thick as the G-Raney Ni-15Mo layer and the β-Raney
Ni-15Mo layer is the outer layer and thus will be the layer in contact with any electrolyte
in which the coated core is placed. Thus the β-Raney Ni-15Mo controls the activity
of the coating. Further, the β-Raney Ni-15Mo does not fall off in the leaching step.
Since the β-Raney Ni-15Mo predominates,this whole coating of FIGURE 5 is collectively
called a β-Raney Ni-15Mo coating.
[0029] FIGURE 6 is a 700X magnification SEM photomicrograph substantially identical to FIGURE
5 except that it is taken after the coated core of FIGURE 5 was operated for over
six weeks in a laboratory scale membrane cell under conditions simulating a typical
commercial chlor-alkali diaphragm cell. The β-Raney Ni-15Mo coating did not experience
any appreciable thinning after six weeks in a diaphragm cell catholyte, thus demonstrating
that the β-Raney Ni-15Mo does not fall off.
[0030] FIGURE 7 shows how the interdiffusion of nickel and aluminum proceeds at 610°C. A
given weight of Ni
2Al
3 has about 50 percent less aluminum than the same weight cf NiAl
3. When there is an unlimited reservoir of aluminum and the alloying temperature is
within the 660°C to 860°C range of the invention, an NiAl3 layer forms adjacent the
aluminum reservoir and an Ni
2Al
3 underneath. In FIGURE 7 the aluminum is at the far left side of the microphotograph,
while nickel is at the far rignt. This is seen to occur even at temperatures as low
as 610°C if the treatment is long enough. However, in FIGURE 7 the NiAl
3 (Beta) layer is only 5-10 microns thick while the Ni
2Al
3 (Gamma) layer is about 35 microns thick as is proven by the microprobe readout. The
solid white horizontal line on the photograph is the "scan" line along which the microprobe
scanned and the white dots are the relative atomic percent nickel found at the corresponding
location on the scan line. The corresponding location on the scan line is that point
on the scan line which is directly above the corresponding dot. This preponderance
of Gamma phase is similarly pronounced at higher temperatures and similar heat treatment
times. However, in FIGURES 5 and 6 where a Ni-15Mo alloy was used it was found that
the Beta phase predominates. It is thus believed the molybdenum stabilizes the NiAl
3 phase so as to yield a constant surprisingly low overvoltage upon subsequent leaching.
[0031] The overvoltage reductions are based on operation of the electrode as the cathode
in a brine electrolysis cell at a current density of 200 milliamps per square centimeter
(i.e. 200 ma/cm2 or 2 KA/m2), which is typical of current densities found in conventional
diaphragm chlor-alkali cells.
[0032] All voltage values quoted herein are based on the 200 ma/cm
2 current density, although the electrodes are equally suitable for operation over
a broad range cf other current densities.
[0033] The porous nickel surface layer of the electrode of the present invention is formed
on a metallic nickel core with which it is in electrical contact. The core material
may be any conductive metal cr alloy, but is preferably nickel or a nickel-molybdenum
alloy so that the substrate itself forms the coating after Raney treatment.
[0034] The electrode can be in the form of any conveniently shaped plate or screen. For
commercial brine electrolysis cells, expanded metal screens are preferred.
[0035] The electrode of the present invention may also bear an optional, very thin coating
of nickel atop the porous nickel surface. The very thin coating, which is preferably
5 to 10 microns thick, improves the mechanical strength and surface stability of the
porous nickel layer, without diminishing its electrochemical activity.
[0036] Electrodes of the invention are prepared by an improved process wherein an interdiffused
nickel-aluminum alloy layer is formed, from which aluminum is subsequently selectively
leached. The process includes the steps of (a) preparing a metallic core with a nickel-bearing
outer layer, (b) aluminizing the surface of the core, (c) interdiffusing the aluminum
and nickel, (d) selectively leaching aluminum from the interdiffused material, (e)
optionally chemically treating to prevent potential pyrophoricity and (f) optionally
coating with nickel to improve the mechanical properties. of the final surface.
[0037] The metallic core which comprises the staring material fcr the electrode is prepared
to have a nickel-bearing outer layer in which the nickel concentration is at least
15 percent, and preferably at least 13 percent by weight. When the core is of substantially
pure nickel or an appropriate nickel-bearing alloy such as Inconel 600, Hastelloy
C or 310 Stainless Steel, the core inherently has the desired nickel-bearing outer
layer.
[0038] It is most preferred to have outer portions of the "core" ("core" is used interchangeably
herein with "substrate") itself serve as the nickel-bearing outer layer, since this
helps eliminate or reduce spalling of the coating by eliminating or reducing the possibility
of corrosion at the interface between the outer layer and core by making the interface
much less abrupt.
[0039] For cores of othermetals or alloys, a nickel coating can be deposited on the core
by known techniques, such as metal dipping, electroplating, electroless plating and
the like. The nickel-bearing outer layer of the core, whether provided by the core
metal itself or as a deposited coating, is conveniently at least 100 microns thick,
and preferably at least 150 microns thick. The maximum thickness of the nickel-bearing
outer layer is a matter of convenience and economic choice. Although cores in the
form of screens or plates, especially screens, are preferred, cores made from foils,
wires, tubes or expanded metal are also suitable. The nickel-bearing surface of the
core, prior to further processing, is thoroughly cleaned by conventional means, such
as chemical cleaning and/or grit blasting, to improve the bond between the nickel-bearing
surface of the core and subsequently applied layers.
[0040] The cleaned surface of the core is subjected to an aluminizing treatment. By "aluminizing",
as used herein, is meant that aluminum is brought into initmate contact with the nickel-bearing
material at the surface of the core so that when heated curing the interdiffusion
step the desired nickel-aluminum, alloy layer is formed. The aluminizing can be accomplished
by any of several known methods, such as flame spraying aluminum onto the surface
of the core, dipping the core into an aluminum melt or by use of fused salt electrolysis.
Dipping is preferred since it has been found to yield the lowest overvoltage coating
upon subsequent Raney treatment.
[0041] When using these methods of aluminizing, an aluminum layer of at least 100 micron
thickness is deposited on the nickel-bearing surface of the core. Much thicker aluminum
layers, of, for example, greater than 500 micron thickness, perform satisfactorily
in the process, but for reasons of economy, aluminum layer thicknesses of between
about 150- and 300-microns are preferred.
[0042] The interdiffusion step, which is usually the next step in the process, is carried
out at a temperature of at least 660°C, i.e., above the normal melting point of aluminum.
Higher temperatures, under 750°C are suitable, with temperatures within the range
of from about 700°C to about 750°C and particularly from about 715° to about 735°C
being most preferred. Usually the interdiffusion is carried out in an atmosphere of
hydrogen, nitrogen or an inert gas. This interdiffusion treatment is continued for
a time sufficient for the aluminum and nickel to interdiffuse and form a nickel-aluminum
alley layer of at least 40 microns and preferably at least 80 microns in thickness.
When the outer layer of the core is of substantially pure nickel, an interdiffused
alloy layer of NiAl3 forms in 1-10 minutes. Interdiffused nickel-aluminum alloy layers
of 100-400 microns in thickness are preferred, with best results being obtained when
the thicknesses are between 150- and 300-microns. Unless molybdenum is added to the
nickel-containing layer, the treatment is stopped by about 30 minutes so that only
a minimum amount of Ni
2Al
3 (Gamma phase will form.
[0043] Since NiAl
3 has a higher proportion of aluminum than Ni
2A1
3, it is believed that temperature should be high enough to allow relatively fast interdiffusion
yet not so high that the supply of aluminum is used up completely, because once the
supply of "reservoir" aluminum in the aluminum layer is used up, further diffusion
merely encourages the diffused aluminum to diffuse or spread out more thinly and thus
encourages formation of Ni
2Al
3 or other less desirable intermetallics having a lower aluminum content than NiAl
3. As noted above, a temperature within the range of from about 660°C to 860°C satisfies
this need. Similarly, the interdiffusion time should be long enough to build up an
interdiffused nickel alloy layer of suitable thickness but not so long as to deplete
the aluminum reservoir. An interdiffusion time within the range of from about 1 minute
to about 30 minutes satisfies this need.
[0044] FIGURE 5 presents a photomicrograph of a cross section of the β-Raney Ni-15Mo cathode
formed from an interdiffused nickel-aluminum Beta phase alloy layer that was formed
by dipping a Ni-15Mo substrate into molten aluminum and interdiffusing the nickel
and aluminum at about 725°C for about 10 minutes. The photomicrography shows the Ni-15Mc
core, upon which is a relatively thin layer of Raneyed Ni
2Al
3, atop of which is comparatively thick layer of Raneyed NiAl
3. In FIGURE 5, the s-Raney Ni 15-Mo cathode that is formed by leaching is derived
almost entirely from the Ni
.85Mo
.15Al
3 phase. Nickel formed from the Ni
.85Mo
.15Al
3 phase is not lost from the active surface during the subsequent leaching step. It
is found that the Raney surface layer derived from Ni
.85Mo
.15Al
3 is stabilized by the 15 percent by weight molybdenum. From about 5-20 percent by
weight Mo is sufficient to stabilize the Beta phase intermetallic.
[0045] The size of the Ni
2Al
3 grains and the rate at which the thickness of the Ni
2A1
3-containing layer grows are highly dependent on whether the aluminum layer is depleted
the length of heat treatment as well as on the temperature at which the aluminum and
nickel are interdiffused. Larger grain size and much faster buildup of the Ni2Al3-containing
layer accompany the use of temperatures of 750°C or more.
[0046] Referring now to the prior art, FIGURE 6 of U.S. Patent No. 4,116,804 shows the dependency
of the average size of the Ni
2Al
3 grains on the temperature of interdiffusion. Note the rapid increase in grain size
that occurs at interdiffusion temperatures of above 660°C, especially above 700°C.
At interdiffusion temperatures below 660°C, the size of the Ni
2Al
3 grains are smaller than those found desirable for the later formation of the active
porous nickel layer. Also, FIGURE 7 of U.S. Patent No. 4,116,304 shows, as a function
of temperature, the time required for a 125 micrcn thick layer of Ni
2Al
3 to form on a nickel core that had been flame-sprayed with aluminum. Note the rapidly
increasing times that are required to obtain a given thickness of the Ni
2Al
3 layer as the temperatures of interdiffusicn are decreased. For the conditions shown
in said FIGURE 7, formation of the Gamma phase layer thickness requires over 74 hours
at 560°C, over 29 hours at 600°C, over 4 hours at 725°C and over 1 hour at 860°C.
Thus the 1-30 minute time of heat treating in the present invention is much less and
therefore less wasteful of fuel supplies and yet as noted elsewhere gives a coating
that also uses less power in operation.
[0047] During the treatment at temperatures above 660°C, excessively long interdiffusion
times, e.g. one hour or more, are avoided for technical, as well as economic reasons.
Temperatures above about 860°C are generally avoided because the equilibrium phase
diagram for Al-Ni, which is depicted in FIGURE 7 of the present invention for purposes
of reference, shows that Beta phase transforms into liquid and Gamma phase (Ni
2A1
3) above about 855°C. Also, for coatings on a substrate differing in composition from
the coating, extended heat treatment such as are needed to produce Gamma phase coamings
might damage the substrate or form undesirable brittle intermetallics of the coaring-
substrate interface. For example, if aluminum is diffused into a nickel-coated-steel
core, excessive interdiffusion time or temperature can result in the aluminum "breaking
through" to the steel base of the core, i.e., the aluminum diffuses all the way through
the nickel into the steel ccre. Break-through is accompanied by the formation of a
very brittle FeAl
3 intermetallic phase, which can significantly undermine the strength of the bond between
the core and the interdiffused layer. Also, if interdiffusion is continued toc long,
all of the available aluminum can be diffused into the nickel such that there is still
a large excess of nickel in the interdiffused material. Under these latter circumstances,
and also frequently when interdiffusion temperatures of above about 100°C are used,
an intermetallic phase forms, which does not permit satisfactory subsequent leaching
of the aluminum from the intermetallic, and consequently, a highly active porous nickel
does not form. By providing sufficient quantities of nickel and aluminum, while avoiding
excessively long treatments or excessively high temperatures during interdiffusion,
break-through and formation of the undesired intermetallics are avoided.
[0048] As described above, the aluminizing and interdiffusion steps are carried out sequentially.
However, the steps can also be performed simultaneously by a pack-diffusion technique.
For example, a mixture of aluminum and alumina powders and an activator can be packed
around a nickel core and then heated in a hydrogen atmosphere at a temperature of
750°C for about 8 hours to form the desired nickel-aluminum alloy layer.
[0049] The formation of the desired nickel-aluminum alloy layer is followed by a selective
leaching step, wherein sufficient aluminum is removed from the surface and the nickel-aluminum
alloy layer to form an active nickel surface layer. The average size of the active
nickel agglomerates is generally less than 35 microns. Such an active layer is shown
in cross section in the scanning-electron micrographs of FIGURES 5 and 6. Generally,
a strong aqueous base, such as NaOH, KOH or other strongly basic solution capable
cf dissolving aluminum, is used in the selective leaching step. Preferably, the selective
leaching is carried out in aqueous caustic solutions containing about 1 to about 30
weight percent NaOH. For example a selective leaching treatment of 20 hours in 10
percent NaCH at ambient conditions (i.e., temperature is not controlled or a treatment
of 14 hours in 10 percent NaCH at ambient temperatures followed by 6 hours in 30 percent
NaOH at 100°C has been found satisfactory fcr producing porous nickel surfaces of
the invention. A preferred selective leaching procedure is carried out first for 2
hours in 1 percent NaOH, then for 20 hours in 10 percent NaOH, both of these substeps
under conditions in which temperature is not controlled, and finally for 4 hours in
30 percent NaOH at 100°C. The leaching procedure removes at least about 60 percent,
and preferably between about 75 and about 95 percent, of the aluminum from the interdiffused
alloy layer and provides a porous nickel surface of unusually high electrochemical
activity. It is recognized that the leaching conditions can be varied from those mentioned
above to achieve effective selective dissolution of the aluminum.
[0050] After the selective leaching, the active nickel coatings may exhibit a tendency to
heat when exposed to air. This self-heating tendency could possibly lead to problems
of pyrophoricity. However, an optional step of chemically treating the porous nickel
layer can be used to eliminate this potential problem. Convenient methods for this
chemical treatment include immersing the porous nickel for at least 1 hour and usually
less than 4 hours in a dilute aqueous solution containing, for example, by weight
(a) 3 percent NaNO, or (b)
3 percent K
2Cr
2O
7 or (c) 3 percent NaClO
3 and 10 percent NaOH. These treatments eliminate the self-heating tendency of the
porous nickel or nickel-molybdenum surface without diminishing its electrochemical
activity or mechanical properties.
[0051] Although the active porous nickel surface layers, as prepared by the preceding steps,
have satisfactory mechanical properties and low tendency to spall, compared with many
of the Raney nickel surfaces of the prior art, the mechanical properties of the layer
can be improved by optionally coating a very thin layer of nickel onto the porous
surface. This nickel layer, which is preferably 5 to 10 microns thick and can be applied
from conventional electroless nickel or nickel electroplating baths, enhances the
mechanical strength of the porous nickel layer without diminishing its electrochemical
activity.
Some Advantages of the Invention
[0052] Contamination of low overvoltage coatings by over- platings of higher overvoltage
metals has now been found to be one of the major obstacles to a long-life low overvoltage
cathode, and was initially felt to be an insurmountable obstacle. However, overplating
has now, in the cathodes of the invention, surprisingly and unexpectedly been virtually
eliminated. This is a major technical breakthrough in enabling long-life, low overvoltage
coatings. It has now been found that there is a threshold potential for such overplating
and that when the cathode polarization potential is reduced below about -1.100 volts
(as measured against a standard mercury-mercury oxide hydrogen electrode), i.e. below
about 140 millivolts overvoltage, that fouling with higher overvoltage metals, such
as for example iron and copper, are substantially eliminated. While it is practical
tc remove many metal contaminants other than iron and copper from the catholyte, there
is somewhat more of a problem with iron and copper removal since the plumbing pipes
carrying water to the cathode chamber are often copper, iron or steel and the cell
housing itself is often made in whole or part of iron or steel for strength and electrical
connections of the cell are often made of copper because of its relatively high conductivity.
In conventional chlor-alkalit cells, this contamination comes mostly from iron.
[0053] It has surprisingly and unexpectedly been found that this elimination of iron-fouling
occurs in the most active cathodes, that is the cathodes having the lowest overvoltage.
Thus the present invention gives the best of both worlds, an amazingly low overvoltage
and an amazingly long life. Heretofore the two were felt to be incompatible objectives.
Namely, it was believed that low overpotential cathode coatings suffered from short
life. This is true even though stable metal anodes of low overpotential are known,
because the problem with anodes was corrosion, not overplating. By its very nature,
an anode tends to corrode while a cathode tends to receive deposits. Solving cathode
corrosion alone does not give low overvoltage or even stable overvoltage. The explanation
for this elimination of iron fouling is not definitely known.
[0054] One possible explanation is the anodic shift offhandedly reported in a recondite
Russian fuel cell research article, Golin et al, "Connection Between Chemical and
Electrochemical Activity of Raney Nickel Catalysts", Electrokhimiya, Vol. 13, No.
7, pp. 1052-1056 (USSR July, 1977). If this shift is such that the catalyst at rest
has about the same potential as steel and then shifts 300 mV or so anodically in solution,
there may be little or no residual electrical potential between steel and the coating
during cell shut-downs to cause iron-fouling and yet when the cathode is in operation
the anodic shift may lower overvoltage to near theoretical (as compared to steel cathodes
which may not experience such a shift). Whatever the cause may actually be, the surprising
result is a "non-fouling" cathode, i.e. one that does not experience any substantial
iron fouling.
[0055] It has also now been found that yet another unexpected and surprising result is achieved
when molybdenum is added to a Beta phase (NiAl
3) intermetallic. The Beta phase formation is stabilized by the addition of molybdenum
in the amount of about 5-20 percent by weight of the total weight of nickel and molybdenum.
This molybdenum is apparently captured in the ordered orthorhombic Beta phase crystal
structure such that the Beta phase can be represented by the formula Ni
xMo
1-xAl
3 where x is the weight percent nickel in the total weight of nickel and molybdenum.
By "stabilized" is meant that once the Beta phase forms it has less of a tendency
to transform to Gamma phase (Ni
2Al
3) and thus the elevated heat treatment temperature can last longer without as much
Gamma phase being formed. In fact, the heat treatment at the optimum 725°C can last
for 2 hours, or 4 hours or even 6 hours with a β-Raney Ni-Mo cathode still being produced.
Since it is now shown that the Beta phase is the intermetallic of choice, this is
an important advantage of the Ni-Mc-Al ternary alloy over the Ni-Al binary alloy.
[0056] It has further been found that the use of Mo in the coating reduces the heat of desorption
of hydrogen (determined by gas phase desorption) and that this reduction correlates
directly with the reduced cver- potential of the Raney nickel with 5-20 percent by
weight molybdenum as compared with pure Raney nickel, both having been prepared from
Beta phase intermetallic precursors. It has further been found that the Beta phase
nickel indeed has a lower heat of desorption than the Gamma phase, as previously reported
in the Zavorin et al Russian article noted above.
[0057] The preferred electrode is a monolithic structure of a Ni-Mo alloy of 5-20 percent
and most preferably from abcut 12-18 percent by weight molybdenum and about 80-95
percent and most preferably 82-88 percent by weight nickel which has been given a
Raney treatment by dipping in molten aluminum and heating for about 1-30 minutes in
an inert atmcsphere at a temperature of from about 660°C to about 855°C. A temperature
of about 700°C to about 750°C and a time of about 5-15 minutes are more preferred
because this gives sufficient time for enough aluminum to interdiffuse into the nickel
to provide maximum preponderance of NiAl
3 or Beta phase over Gamma phase (Ni
2Al
3) but does not allow enough time for the diffusion to result in the preponderance
of Gamma phase (Ni
2Al
3) as was specifically called for in U.S. Patent No. 4,116,804, noted above.
[0058] Contrary to the disclosure of U.S. Patent No. 4,116,804, it has been surprisingly
found that the Beta phase NiAl
3 when molybdenum is added thereto, is not lost during leaching and in fact experiences
no appreciable thinning during subsequent use in a chlor-alkali cell. (see FIGURES
5 and 6).
[0059] It was initially hypothesized that the non-fouling nature of the NiAl
3 surface layer was due to a gradual slow erosion and falling off of the individual
outermost NiAl
3 grains along with any iron which had been deposited thereon. In fact, it was even
thought that such slow continual erosion would be desirable to prevent iron buildup
on the cathode surface, even though such erosion would make for a shorter cathode
life than if there were no such erosion. However, it is most unexpected and startling
to find that there was no substantial erosion of the coating and that even though
there was no substantial erosion the cathode did not pick up any substantial amount
of iron. The additional molybdenum had apparently lowered the overvoltace below some
threshold level where iron fouling ceases to occur.
[0060] The surprising non-thinning of the NiAl
3 type coatings indicates there is probably some other as yet unknown cause for the
unexpected superior resistance of the NiAl
3 coating to iron fouling. In view of the teaching of U.S. Patent No. 4,116,804 that
NiAl
3 is mechanically weak, it was not expected that molybdenum addition would result in
a stabilized layer.
[0061] In fact, U.S. Patent No. 3,947,331, issued March 30, 1976 to ANVAR with Kinh and
Montvelle as inventors, teaches that codepcsits of nickel and molybdenum conventionally
give layers of little mechanical strength, porous, fissured and incompatible with
any practical industrial use. Such fissuring might conceivably be useful in some crystalline
coatings which are not given a Raney treatment since such coatings might benefit from
the increased surface area generated by such fissures. However, with a Raney surface
further fissuring would seem to be harmful, rather than helpful, because such fissuring
would seemingly tend to make the already ragged Raney microstructure break apart and
fall off. In Raney coatings, the ordinary artisan seeks strength, not weamess. Thus
it was not only surprising but rather startling that the Raney nickel coating with
added molybdenum could survive in a typical chlor-alkali cell environment without
any appreciable thinning of the coating.
[0062] Advantageous use can be made of the electrodes of the invention, especially as hydrogen-evolution
cathodes of cells intended for the electrolysis of brine, water or the like. The electrodes
are particularly preferred for use in brine electrolysis cells, wherein the high electrochemical
activity of the S-Raney nickel or nickel-molybdenum surface remains constant for long
periods of extended continuous use. When the electrode is intended for use in a brine-electrolysis
diaphragm cell, the diaphragm can be applied directly to the porous nickel surface
of the electrode. For example, a tubular screen electrode of the invention, with suction
established through the inside of the tube, can be immersed in an aqueous dispersion
of polytetrafluoroethylene fibers and asbestos fibers. The fibers are sucked onto
the outer surface of the screen until a diaphragm of the desired thickness is formed.
After removal of the suction, water is removed from the assembly, as for example,
by heating at 95°C for 5 hours. The assembly is then heated at 350°C for about one-half
hour in an inert atmosphere, to complete the diaphragm fabrication. As is known in
the art, the satisfactory operating lifetime of such diaphragms is not nearly as long
as that of the cathodes of the brine electrolysis cells. Economics dictates that the
diaphragms must be changed several times during the operating life of the cathode.
With electrodes of the present invention, the diaphragms can be readily stripped from
the porous nickel surface and replaced many times with insignificant detriment to
the electrochemical activity or mechanical properties of the electrode. Similarly
satisfactory results are alsc obtained with other diaphragm materials and with membrane
materials (such as cationic exchange membranes of hydrophilic phosphonated, sulfonated
or carboxylated fluorocarbontelomers blended with inert fibers such as asbestos, glass,
tetrafluoroethylene and polytetrafluoroethylene).
Test Methods
[0063] The various parameters associated with the present invention are measured by the
techniques described below.
Thickness of Porous Nickel Layer
[0064] Scanning electron micrograph cross sections are prepared perpendicular to the surface
of the electrode. Micrographs are taken of typical areas of the cross section. A convenient
magnification, usually between 150 and 700X permits inclusion of the entire thickness
of the porous nickel layer in the photomicrograph. The thickness of the porous nickel
layer is determined by measuring the layer thickness depicted in the photomicrograph
and dividing by the magnification. At least five such measurements are made on at
least three micrographs and then averaged to obtain the thickness of the porous nickel
layer of the electrode. For electrodes of the invention, this provides thickness measurements
having a coefficient of variation cf generally less than 5 percent. Photomicrographs
of the type that can be used to make these thickness measurements are given in FIGURES
5 and 6.
Surface Porosity and Average Agglomerate Size
[0065] Scanning electron micrographs are prepared of randomly selected areas of the surface
of the porous nickel layer of the electrode. The magnification is conveniently set
between about 100 and 500X. The micrograph is printed on photographic paper of uniform
weight. As can be seen from the scanning electron micrograph of FIGURE 5 or 6, the
individual agglomerates of the porous nickel of the electrodes of the invention (labelled
"A") are readily identifiable; the dark areas between and within the agglomerates
(labelled "B") depict the porous regions. Generally, a magnification is selected so
that at least five full agglomerates are displayed in the photomicrograph. The surface
porosity and the average agglomerate size can be measured from the micrographs as
follows:
1. From a prepared micrograph depicting a typical area of the surface of the electrode,
cut away the agglomerates that are only partially shown at the edges of the micrograph.
In deleting the partial agglomerates, cut along the centerline of the porous region
between the partial agglomerate and the closest whole agglomer- ate. Measure the area of the remaining portion of the micrograph. The area
of the micrograph divided by the square of the magnification equals the actual area,
S, of the surface being analyzed. Determine the weight, W, cf the cut-out area. 2.
Count the number of agglomerates, N, within the cut-out area of the micrograph that
lie in the plane of the surface of the specimen. Those that clearly lie in a plane
below the surface of the specimen are not counted.
3. Subdivide the cut-out portion of the micrograph into subcuttings of areas depicting
the agglomerates in the plane of the specimen surface and areas depicting porous regions
in the plane of the specimen surface. In making these subdivisions care is taken to
include in the porous area of the specimen surface, the areas of the cut-out micrograph
that are shown as (a) black regions, (b) agglomerates that are clearly beneath the
plane of the specimen surface and (c) sides of agglomerates, lying below and at an
angle to the plane of the specimen surface (usually appearing as a somewhat lighter
shade than the black porous regions).
4. Weigh the cuttings representing the agglomerates, wa, and the cuttings representing the porous regions, wp, and assure that no cuttings
were lost by checking that wa + w = W.
5. Calculate the surface porosity, P, expressed as a percentage, from P = (wp/W) 100.
6. Calculate the agglomerate size, D, from D = [S/N(1-P/100)]
7. Make replicate measurements tc determine average values for the samples studied.
For electrode of the invention, five replicate measurements are usually sufficient
to result in average values of P and D having coefficients of variations of less than
10 percent.
[0066] An alternative method fcr measuring the average agglomerate size, D, is to (1, cut
cut at least five typical agglomerates from each of five micrographs taken at the
same magnification, X, of the surface of the electrode; (2) determine the total weight,
w, and number, n, of the cut-out agglomerates; (3) measure K, the weight per unit
area of the micrograph paper; and (4) calculate the average agglomerate size from
[0067] D = [(w/m/K] [1/X] Nickel-Aluminum Alloy Layer Prior to Leaching
[0068] Separate micrographs of the intermetallic precursors are not needed since the structure
can be ascertained readily from the leached sample. The leaching is seldom, if ever,
continued long enough to leach clear through to the core or substrate, as that would
tend to dissolve any intermetallics at the core coating interface and thus tend to
loosen the coating from the core. Thus a layer of unleached alloy is generally available
for viewing in the micrographs of the Raneyed coating.
[0069] However, separate micrographs of the unleached layer could be made as follows:
[0070] Metallographic cross sections are prepared perpendicular to the surface of the precursor
of the electrode, that is, after the interdiffusion treatment but prior to the selective
leaching step. Plane polarized light is used. Photomicrographs are taken of typical
areas of the cross section to include the layer containing the nickel-aluminum alloy.
Convenient magnifications are between 150 and 700X. The thickness of the nickel-aluminum
binary or nickel-molybdenum-aluminum ternary alloy layer is then determined in the
same manner as described above for the thickness of the porous nickel layer.
[0071] When the nickel-aluminum alloy layer is of Ni
2Al
3 or NiAl
3, measurement of the size of the grains is facilitated by superimposing a grid on
the photomicrograph of the layer. Ten squares of the grid are randomly selected from
the middle 80 percent of the NiAl
3 or Ni
2Al
3 containing laver. The total number of grains, Z, within the boundary of each square
is counted. The area of the grid on the photomicrograph divided by the square of the
magnification is the actual area, A, of the layer under examination. The size, d,
of the NiAl
3 or Ni
2Al
3 grains in the layer, for each grid are examined, is then calculated from d = (A/Z)
½. This formula holds for the layers that consist essentially of NiAl
3 or Vi
2Al
3 grains. The average NiAl
3 or Ni
2Al
3 grain size for a given sample is then simply the average of the size of the grains
for each of the 10 grids. To characterize the NiAl
3 or Ni
2Al
3 grain size in the precursor of the electrode of the invention, at least three photomicrographs
of the cross section are subjected to the above analysis and result in a measurement
that has a coefficient of variation of less than 5 percent.
Metalloarachic Specimens
[0072] The cross sections to be subjected to the micrographic examinations described above
are prepared as follows. A sample is cut and sectioned by use of a diamond saw operating
at low speed. The specimen is then mounted in an epoxy resin. Convenient dimensions
for the cross section of the specimen are about 6 by 13 millimeters. Primary polishing
of the specimen is carried out on a polishing wheel equipped with silicon carbide
papers of grades 240A, 400A and 600A. Fine polishing is then accomplished by use of
(a) 1.0 micron levigated a-alumina on a felt-covered wheel and then (b) 0.05 micron
levigated γ-alumina on a micro-cloth-covered wheel.
Electrochemical Cell
[0073] FIGURE 8 shows the structure of a test cell used for measuring the cathode potentials
of the various plate electrodes of the samples given below.
Electrochemical Measurements
[0074] A schematic diagram of an electrochemical test cell, used for measuring the cathode
potentials of the various plate electrodes of the examples below, is given in FIGURE
8.
[0075] Test cell 1, made of tetrafluoroethylene ("
TFE"), is divided by diaphragm 2 into two chambers, cathode chamber 10 and anode chamber
20. The diaphragm, which is placed between two TFE separators sealed in place by caustic-
resistant gaskets, is made of Nafion
® 227, which is a homogeneous film 7 mils thick of 1200 equivalent weight perfluorosulfonic
acid resin which has been chemically modified by ethylene diamine converting a depth
of 1.5 mils to the perfluorosulfonamide laminated with a "T-12" tetrafluoroethylene
filament fabric marketed by duPont.
[0076] A circular titanium anode 21 of two square centimeters area coated with a titanium
oxide-ruthenium oxide mixed crystal is installed at the end of the cathode in the
anode chamber. Test electrode 11, which becomes the cathode of the test cell, is installed
at the end of the cathode chamber by means of flanges and gaskets (not shown). Perforated
tetrafluoroethylene separators 3 and 4 are placed between membrane 2 and anode 21
and cathode 11, respectively.
[0077] A circular area of one square centimeter of the porous nickel surface of the test
electrode is exposed to the interior of the cathode compartment. The cathode and anode
are connected electrically to controllable voltate scurce by cathode current collector
in and anode current collector 22. An ammeter is connected in the line between the
two electrodes. The entire cell 10 is then immersed in a thermostated liquid bath
so as to give a constant cperating temperature e.g., 85°C.
[0078] Catholyte, consisting cf an aquecus solution, containing 11 weight percent sodium
hydroxide and 15 weight percent sodium chloride, is pumped through inlet 13 into the
cathode compartment at a rate which establishes an overflow through outlet 14. The
catholyte is maintained at 85°C. Similarly, anolyte, consisting of an aqueous solution
of 1.5 pH containing 24-26 weight percent sodium chloride is pumped through inlet
23 into the anode compartment and overflowed through outlet 24. The salt concentrations
of the catholyte and anolyte are typical of that encountered in commercial brine electrolysis
cells. The use of separate catholyte and anolyte feeds, rather than a single brine
feed, assures better control of the desired catholyte composition. The catholyte and
anolyte flows are controlled so that there is a small flow of solution from the anode
to the cathode compartment, which flow is sufficient to assure ionic conductivity
across the cell, but insufficient to significantly affect the catholyte composition.
[0079] Luggin tetrafluoroethylene capillary 25, installed in the cathode charter 10 and
Luggin capillary 15 installed in the cathode chamber 10 and positioned 1/2 mm from
the surface are each connected to a respective mercury-mercury cxide reference electrode
or "S.H.E." (not shown), which in turn is connected through voltmeter 6, to the other
electrode of cell 10. A Luggin capillary is a probe which, in making ionic or electrolytic
contact between the anode or cathode and the reference electrode, minimizes the voltage
drop due to solution resistance and permits direct measurement of the anode or cathode
potential with respect tc the reference electrode.
[0080] To determine the cathode potential of a test electrode, a vcltage is impressed between
the anode and test electrode (i.e., cathode;, such that a current density of 200 ma/cm
2 is established at the cathode. The current density is the current measured by the
ammeter in milliamps divided by the area (i.e., 1 cm
2) of the porous nickel surface of the test electrode exposed to catholyte. Thus 200
ma would be applied to cathode 11 to achieve a current density of 200 ma/cm
2. Hydrogen gas, generated at the cathode is removed from the cathode compartment through
catholyte outlet 14. Chlorine gas, generated at the platinum anode, is similarly removed
through anolyte outlet 24. The cell is operated in this manner for at least 2 hours
prior to reading the cathode potential directly from the voltmeter.
Examples
[0081] In each of the examples, electrodes are prepared and tested as cathodes in brine
electrolysis test cells. All characterizations are carried out in accordance with
the test procedures described above. Unless stated otherwise, all compositions are
given as weight percentages.
EXAMPLE 1
[0082] Five groups of test electrodes are prepared as follows:
1. Mild Steel.
A theroughly cleaned mild steel coupon.
2. G-Raney Ni on nickel core (prior art).
A 1.6-mm-thick nickel 200 sheet, assaying at least 99 percent nickel, is cut into
a coupon measuring about one cm2. The coupon which is to become the core of the electrode is thoroughly cleaned by
degreasing with acetone, lightly etching with 10 percent HCl, rinsing with water and
after drying, grit blasting with No. 24 grit Al2O3 at a pressure of 3.4 kg/cm2 (50 psi).
[0083] The cleaned nickel coupon is aluminized by flame- spraying a 305-micron-thick coating
of aluminum on the surface of the nickel coupon. A conventional plasma- arc spray
gun operating at 13 tc 16 kilowatts at a distance about 10 cm from the coupon is used
with aluminum powder of -200 tc -325 mesh.
[0084] The aluminized nickel coupon is heat treated at 760°C for 8 hours in a nitrogen atmosphere
to interdiffuse the nickel and aluminum and form a layer which is predominantly Gamma
phase (Ni
2Al
3) nickel aluminide. After heat treating, the coupon is allowed to cool in a current
of nitrogen for about 2 hours. This produces a predominantly Ni
2Al
3 interdiffused layer.
[0085] The remaining coupon is then subjected to a leaching treatment wherein the aluminum
is selectively removed from the interdiffused layer to leave an active porous nickel
surface on the coupon. The leaching treatment consists of immersing the interdiffused
coupon in 10 percent NaOH for 20 hours, without temperature control, followed by 4
hours in 30 percent NaOH at 100°C. The coupon is then rinsed with water for 30 minutes.
3. β-Raney Ni on nickel core (plasma sprayed).
[0086] A 1.6-mm-thick nickel 200 sheet, assaying at least 99 percent nickel, is cut into
a coupon measuring about one cm . The coupon which is to become the core of the electrode
is thoroughly cleaned by degreasing with acetone, lightly etching with 10 percent
HC1, rinsing with water and after. drying, grit blasting with No. 24 grit A1
20
3 at a pressure of 3.4 kg/cm
2 (50 psi).
[0087] The cleaned nickel coupon is aluminized by flame- spraying a 305-micron-thick coating
of aluminum on the surface cf the nickel coupon. A conventional plasma- arc spray
gun operating at 13 to 16 kilowatts at a distance about 10 cm from the coupon is used
with aluminum powder of -200 to +325 mesh.
[0088] The aluminized nickel coupon is heat treated at 725°C for 10 minutes in a nitrogen
atmosphere to interdiffuse the nickel and aluminum and form a layer which is predominantly
Beta phase (NiAl
3) nickel aluminide. After heat treating, the coupon is allowed to cool in a current
of nitrogen for about 2 hours. This produces a predominantly NiAl
3 interdiffused layer.
[0089] The remaining coupon is then subjected to a leaching treatment wherein the aluminum
is selectively removed from the interdiffused layer to leave an active porous nickel
surface on the coupon. The leaching treatment consists of immersing the interdiffused
coupon in 10 percent NaOH for 20 hours, without cemperature control, followed by 4
hours in 30 percent NaOH at 100°C. The coupon is then rinsed with water for 30 minutes.
[0090] 4. β-Raney Ni on nickel core (dipped). A 1.6- mm-thick nickel 200 sheet, assaying
at least 99 percent nickel, is cut into a coupon measuring about one cm
2. The coupon which is to become the core of the electrode is thoroughly cleaned by
degreasing with acetone, lightly etching with 10 percent HC1, rinsing with water and
after drying, grit blasting with No. 24 grit Al
2O
3 at a pressure of 3.4 kg/cm
2 (50 psi).
[0091] The cleaned nickel coupon is aluminized by applying a commercial flux and then dipping
in a pot of molten aluminum for a sufficient time to entirely coat the coupon with
aluminum.
[0092] The aluminized nickel coupon is heat treated at 725°C for 10 minutes in a nitrogen
atmosphere to interdiffuse the nickel and aluminum and form a layer which is predominantly
Beta phase(NiAl
3) nickel aluminide. After heat treating, the coupon is allowed to cool in a current
of nitrogen for about 2 hours. This produces a predominantly NiAl
3 interdiffused layer.
[0093] The remaining coupon is then subjected to a leaching treatment wherein the aluminum
is selectively removed from the interdiffused layer to leave an active porous nickel
surface on the coupon. The leaching treatment consists of immersing the interdiffused
coupon in 10 percent NaOH for 2C hours, without temperature control, followed by 4
hours in 30 percent NaOH at 100°C. The coupon is then rinsed with water for 30 minutes.
[0094] 5. β-Raney Ni-15Mc on Ni-15Mo core (dipped). A 1.6-mm-thick sheet of an alloy assaying
at least 84 percent nickel and 15.0 ± 0.1 percent Mo (Ni-15Mo) is cut into a circular
coupon measuring about one cm
2. The coupon which is to become the core of the electrode is thoroughly cleaned by
degreasing with acetone, lightly etching with 10 percent HCl, rinsing with water and
after drying, grit blasting with No. 24 grit Al
2O
3 at a pressure of 3.4 kg/cm
2 (50 psi).
[0095] The cleaned nickel-molybdenum coupon is aluminized by applying a commercial flux
and then dipping in a pot of molten aluminum for a sufficient time to entirely coat
the coupon with aluminum.
[0096] The aluminized nickel-molybdenum coupon is heat treated at 725°C for 10 minutes in
a nitrogen atmosphere to interdiffuse the nickel and aluminum and form a layer which
is predominantly Beta phase nickel molybodenum aluminide ((Ni-15Mo)Al
3). After heat treating, the coupon is allowed to cool in a current of nitrogen for
about 2 hours. This produces a predominantly Ni-15MoAl
3 interdiffused layer.
[0097] The remaining coupon is then subjected to a leaching treatment wherein the aluminum
is selectively removed from tne interdiffused layer to leave an active porous nickel-molybdenum
surface on the coupon. The leaching treatment consists of immersing the interdiffused
coupon in 10 percent NaOH for 20 hours, without temperature control, followed by 4
hours in 30 percent NaOH at 100°C. The coupon is then rinsed with water for 30 minutes.
[0098] The cathode potentials are monitored for 45 days to determine if the potential experiences
a steady increase or instead levels out at some value.
[0099] The results are plotted in FIGURE 1. It is seen that the Raney Ni-15Mo from Beta
phase precursor is constant from start to finish at a lower level than the other four
samples and that the Gamma phase sample, which initially had a potential of about
120 mV more cathodic than the Raney Ni-15Mo, after 45 days has about 320 mV more cathodic
potential. Also, the Raney Ni (without molybdenum) from Beta phase initially has 50
mV and 90 mV more cathodic potential than the Raney Ni-15Mo from Beta precursor (dipped)
depending on whether dipped or plasma sprayed. However, the
Raney Ni from Beta precursor without added molybdenum experiences an increase in cathodic
potential of about 50 millivolts over the 45 day test. It is also seen that clean
mild steel initially had a potential drop of about 150 mV and then slowly increased
back to its original starting value of about -1.500 volts. The constant low overpotential
of 60 millivolts for the Raney Ni-15Mo from Beta phase precursor is unexpected.
EXAMPLE 2
[0100] A β-Raney Ni-15Mo coupon of the invention is prepared by the same procedure as for
coupon 5 of Example 1. A second coupon of the invention is prepared by the same procedure
as for coupon 2 of Example 1 except that instead of a 99 percent- nickel sheet a Ni
.90-Mo
.10 sheet is used instead, so as to produce a β-Raney Ni-10Mo (plasma sprayed).
[0101] The results are plotted in FIGURE 2 as cathode polarization potential (IR Free versus
current density. β-Raney Ni-15Mo has 20-40 millivolts less polarization, i.e., less
overvoltage. At a typical current density for diaphragm of 200 ma/cm
2, the cathodic potential is about 0.97 volts for β-Raney Ni-10Mo (plasma sprayed)
and about -0.93 volts for S-Raney Ni-15Mo (dipped). At 200 ma/cm
2 a typical IR Free cathodic potential for the mild steel electrode of Example 1 was
-1.28 volts (see FIGURE 4).
EXAMPLE 3
[0102] The coupons of Example 2 are tested for 45 days at 200 ma/cm
2 current density in the standard catholyte (15 percent NaCl, 11 percent NaOH, 0.1
percent NaClO
3, 73.9 percent H
20 at 85°C) and measured against a mercury, mercury oxide ("Standard Hydrogen Electrode"
or "S.H.E.") by the electrochemical measurement technique noted above. Two coupons
of β-Raney Ni-15Mo (dipped) and one coupon of B-Raney Ni-10Mo (plasma sprayed) are
used. The β-Raney Ni-15Mo (dipped) coupons each have a constant cathodic potential
of -1.03 volts (90 millivolts overpotential) while the β-Raney Ni-10Mo (plasma sprayed)
has a slowly - fluctuating cathodic potential of -1.04 to -1.140 volts versus the
S.H.E. The potential B-Raney Ni-10Mo (plasma sprayed) levels out after about 4 weeks
and remains steady at -1.08 volts (140 millivolts) overpotential.
EXAMPLE 4
[0103] A first coupon is prepared according to the same procedure as prescribed for coupon
2 of Example 1 to yield a prior art G-Raney Ni coated Ni cathode. A second coupon
is prepared according to the same procedure as prescribed for coupon 3 of Example
1 to yield a β-Raney Ni coated Ni cathode of the invention. A third coupon is prepared
according to the method prescribed for coupon 1 of Example 1 to yield a mild steel
cathode. The IR Free polarization curves versus current density are determined by
electrochemical measurements for the three coupons in a standard catholyte as described
above. The β-Raney Ni cathode of the invention has about 60 millivolts less polarization
potential at 200 ma/cm
2 than the prior art G-Raney Ni cathode. Also plotted for reference is the β-Raney
Ni-15Mo (dipped) coated Ni-15Mo cathode of FIGURE a and Example 2. The β-Raney Ni-15Mo
(dipped) cathode of the invention has about 110 millivolts less overpotential at 200
ma/cm2.