[0001] This invention relates to directional lamp shades for minimizing the light emitted
from a source outside one general direction.
[0002] Overhead lighting (i.e. lighting from overhead liminaires) is used for the great
majority of workplaces. Tasks such as reading and writing at a desk are often done
with illumination provided solely by the overhead lighting system used for general
room illumination. Sometimes it is advantageous to provide increased illumination
in certain parts of the room; this may be done with local light sources such as desk
or reading lamps or with a more directional type of luminaire (e.g. spotlamps) which
for convenience may be mounted on a nearby wall or ceiling.
[0003] One environment where directional light sources are used is in air traffic control
tower cabins. Light is required in such cabins for reading, writing, seeing instruments
and operating controls and communication equipment. At night, the cabin operators
need to be able to see the dim external scene without hindrance from the cabin lighting
- either as disability glare or as reflections in the windows. Figure 1 of the accompanying
drawings illustrates schematically the problem of liminaire reflection in a window.
Windows in some flight control cabins and some other control centres slope outwards
towards the top. This allows a better downwards view from close to the window, but
objects in the upper part of the cabin interior can then cause unwanted images overlying
the external field view around and above the horizontal direction. If those objects
are moderately dark (as a result of dim illumination of poorly reflective surfaces),
then the resulting images will be relatively faint. However, cabins with light coloured
ceilings and unshielded luminaires (e.g. exposed flyorescent tubes) will tend to have
relatively prominent images in their windows.
[0004] Other applications for directional light sources include aircraft carrier flying
control cabins, ship's bridges, railway and crane control cabins and other situations
where operatons need panel or desk illumination with minimal degracatic of their external
view. Other applications for a spotlamp with little off-axis illumination are for
searchlights, landing lights, television and photographic studios art galleries. radar
screen monitoring areas and intruder detection systems for example.
[0005] Projector-type spotlamps having an illuminated aperture which is imaged by an objective
lens on a workplace are known. However, these devices are bulky and expensive and
the objective lenses are visible from as much as 80 degrees from the axis. Stray light
from multiple reflections and lens imperfections would render unshaded projectors
unsuitable for flight control cabins for example. Addition of an effective shade would
add substantially to their already excessive length.
[0006] More conventional methods for limiting off-axis illumination include the use of shades
and louvre devices. Shades are usually cylindrical or conical in shape; and louvres
can have linear, grid or cylindrical elements. The effectiveness of these is related
to the light absorbing properties of .: the inner surfaces of the device. Even with
materials having unusually small total reflectances (such as black flock paper and
black velvet), as much as one per cent of the incident light may be reflected. A cylindrical
shade with an inside lining of clean black flock paper has been found unacceptably
bright for use in flight control cabins for example. Furthermore, black flock paper
and black velvet are notoriously difficult to keep clean and deposits of airborne
dust soon degrade the special light absorbing properties of that type of material.
[0007] It is an object of the present invention to provide a relatively simple lamp shade
which is effective to provide illumination within a predetermined area whilst allowing
very little light to reach outside that· area.
[0008] According to the present invention there is provided a lamp shade for use with a
light source and including a hollow tubular body arranged to be mounted over the light
source, the body having an open exit and spaced from the light source for allowing
a light cone to emerge from the body, the-length of the body being predetermined so
that no direct light ray paths from the light source through the open exit end lie
outside a predetermined cone semi-angle, at least one baffle extending inwardly from
the body and arranged so that no part of the inside surface of the body that is capable
of direct illumination, by the light source can be seen through the exit end from
a point located substantially outside the light cone.
[0009] The "length of the body" is the dimension in the general direction from the light
source to the open exit end. Throughout this specification the word "cone" is to be
interpreted broadly and includes generally right circular cones, elliptical cones,
square and rectangular pyramidal illuminated areas and substantial sectors thereof.
The "cone semi-angle" is defined as the maximum desired angle between an axis extending
from the centre of the light source through the centre of the open exit end of the
body and the direct light beam path emerging from the shade and diverging at the largest
possible angle from that axis.
[0010] This geometry of the lamp shade is designed to prevent direct light from the source
reaching outside the predetermined area and to prevent most light that has undergone
only one specular or diffuse reflection.within the shade from reaching outside the
predetermined area.
[0011] In the preferred arrangement the body is generally cylindrical having an upper end
for receiving the light source and a lower end defining the open exit end, the shade
including a plurality of the baffles, each baffle being in the form of an annular
disk having a central opening. In another arrangement the body is in the form of a
truncated hemisphere with the light source arranged to be located in the largest diameter
portion and the open exit end being provided in the smallest diameter portion, the
shade including a plurality of baffles in the form of annular disks extending inwardly
of the body, the spacing between the disks reducing towards the open exit end of the
body.
'
[0012] The baffles may have sharp inner edges to minimise reflections therefrom. Accordingly
the inner edges of the disks defining the central openings may be chamfered at both
the upper and lower surfaces of the disks. Alternatively the inner edges of each disk
defining the central opening may be turned upwardly towards the light source at an
angle to the plane of the disk, the upper surface of the disk at the inner edges also
being chamfered at an angle to the plane of the disk.
[0013] One possible embodiment, of the present invention and some possible constructional
variations will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Figure 1 is a schematic view of a work station adjacent a window illustrating the
problem of luminaire reflection in the window,
Figure 2 is a schematic side sectional view of a lamp shade accprding to one embodiment
of the present invention,
Figure 3 illustrates how the baffle spacings are determined,
Figure 4 illustrates a possible problem with reflections from the disk inner edges,
Figure 5 shows the limits of reflecting angles from the disk inner edges,
Figure 6 shows the umbral and penumbral regions of the light cone,
Figures 7 and 8 show two embodiments of sharpened disks,
Figure 9 shows a variation of the Figure 2 construct- ion, and
-Figure 10 shows a bottom plan view with a modified disk.
[0014] Referring to Figure 2, the lamp shade is for producing a right circular light cone
and the body 10 is generally cylindrical having an upper end 11 for receiving the
light source 13, the connection between the light source 13 and the upper end 11 preferably
being light tight. If desired the upper end 11 may be provided with air vents (not
shown) which allow cooling air flow over the source 13 but which provide a tortuous
path for escape of light. The lower end 12 of the cylindrical body 10 defines the
open exit end 14 and may be provided with a protective skirt of a resilient material
such as neoprene to protect the shade and also to guard against a person being injured
by the lower end 12 of the body 10.
[0015] The body 10 is preferably made of an opaque material such as metal or suitable plastics
material.
[0016] The length H of the body 10, as mentioned above, is chosen to prevent direct light
from the source 13 reaching areas outside the cone. A length of 180 mm and a diameter
of 150 mm diameter used with a spotlamp of 100 mm face diameter (yielding a cone semi-angle
Y of about 35 degrees) was found to be an acceptable compromise between several competing
factors in a flight control cabin:- i.e., headroom required, extend, quantity and
evenness or workspace illumination; and the cutoff angle between illuminated and shaded
regions.
[0017] From an analysis of the work space requirements the length of the body 10 may be
determined from the formula

where γ is the cone semi-angle, W is the body diameter, H is the body length and D
is the lamp diameter.
[0018] A further characteristic of the shade pertains to stray light rays outside.the cone
semi-angle γ. These result from reflection and/or diffraction of source rays by the
inner surface of the body 10. Because performance is inversely related to the amount
of stray light, it is preferred for the inner surface of the body 10 to have a low
total reflectance and it may be painted matt or gloss black. The total reflectance
is preferably about 4 per cent or-less.
[0019] The shade includes a plurality of baffles 15 which are provided to act as a light
trap to minimise light having undergone a single specular or diffuse reflection from
passing outside the desired light cone. The baffles 15 are in the form of annular
disks having a constant radial width i.e., the difference between the outer disk diameter-and
the diameter of the circular opening in the disk. The disks 15 may be mounted to the
cylindrical body 10 in any suitable manner. The disk 15a (Figure 2) nearest to the
open end 14 is spaced from that end so that its inner edges just touch the light beam
path 16 extending from the furthest.part of the light source 13. and passing through
the open end 14 at the cone semi-angle γ. Preferably the baffles 15 have a low total
reflectance and may be painted like the inner surfaces of the body 10.
[0020] The disks 15 are equally spaced along the length of . the body 10. For the cylindrical
body 10 the spacing S between the inner edges of adjacent disks 15 is not more than
that given by the formula:

where T is the disk radial width, in order to prevent observation of rays which
have undergone just one reflection (viz. reflection from the inner body surface only).
[0021] The minimum number of spacings, N, is found by evaluating W/T and rounding up to
the next integer. Should that ratio be an integer, then
[0022] 
[0023] The number of disks 15 is then (N-1).
[0024] The formulae for the spacings and number of disks 15 are derived later.
[0025] The inner edges of the baffles(s) 15 are preferably arranged to reduce specular and
diffuse reflections therefrom to areas outside the light cone' which can arise as
shown in Figure 4. For the cylindrical body 10, it may be convenient to form the annular
baffles 15 from sheet material. In that case, the inner edge of each disk 15 comprises
a cylindrical surface of short length so that reflections, both specular and diffuse,
can emanate from those inner surfaces and as a result, light from the source 13 could
be directed outside the cone semi-angle γ after just one reflection. Although only
a small fraction of the total luminous flux could be so directed, the performance
would nevertheless be degraded below that of ideal light traps (i.e., perfectly black
baffles with optically sharp edges). The reflective effect may be reduced towards
the limit set by diffraction if the internal edge of each disk 15 is machined or otherwise
treated to reduce to or towards a sharp edge.'
[0026] Accordingly in one embodiment shown in Figure 7 the disk inner edges are sharpened,
preferably by means of a chamfer or the like provided at both upper and lower surfaces
17,18 of the disk 15. In the case of an annular disk 15 the angle a 1 of the chamfer
face 19 at the upper surface 17 of the disk 15 (i.e. the surface closer to the light
source 13) is smaller than the smallest angle β of the path from disk inner edge through
the open exit end 14 of the body 10 (Figure 5) and the angle α
2 of the chamger face 20 at the disk lower surface 18 is smaller than the smallest
angle β
2 of the path from the light source 13 to the edge of disk 15, all angles α
1, α
2, β
1,β
2 being measured relative to the plane of the disk 15. Using the.geometrical analysis
derived later, the following are upper limits for α
1 and a
2 for each disk 15;

and

where the disks are numbered n = 1, 2, .....(N-1) starting with the disk 15a nearest
the open end 14 of
.the body 10.
[0027] In another.embodiment (Figure 8) the inner part of each disk 15 is turned upwardly
towards the light source 13'at an angle α
B (being less. than or equal to the larger of α
1 and α
2) to the plane of the disk 15. The disk 15 is also chamfered by machining or otherwise
treated to provide the angle α
S (being less than or equal to the smaller of α
1 and
a2). The angles a
B and α
S may be chosen in order to satisfy the requirements of more than one disk 15.
[0028] The light source 13 may be any suitable type such as a spotlamp. The layout and orientation
of the workplace, windows, observers, etc., will indicate the preferred values for
the cone semi-angle, γ , and the total body length, H. The term (2H tanY ) can then.be
evaluated. For equation (1), this term should be equal to (W+D), and therefore should
be considered when seeking a suitable lamp.
[0029] Lamp characteristics - including directionality (illustrated by its intensity polar
diagram), total output, suitability for dimming, availability and practicability -
will further constrain the lamp choice. Of those eligible, the lamp with the smallest
emitting face is preferably chosen as this will yield the most favourable ratio of
umbral to penumbral regions exposed to direct illumination. Lamp diameter D, will
then be known and so W may be calculated using equation (1). Should it not prove possible
to find a suitable small lamp, a larger lamp and a longer shade (i.e., a larger value
of H) may be considered.
[0030] The nature of the workspace and the.liminaire position (e.g., the liminaire may be
recessed) are further factors which may determine the length H of the shade body 10.
[0031] After the iterative procedure above has identified the compromise which is most satisfactory
to the designer, fH, W, D,γ} will have been defined.
[0032] The number of spacings, N, or disks 15, (N-1), will determine the disk width, T,
and disk spacing, S, if equations (3) and (2) are used. Although more disks 15 would
increase the umbral to penumbral ratio more manufacturing expense would be incurred:
Moreover, because diffraction at each internal edge produces some stray light, the
number of disks 15 also has to be a compromise between a large number for good geometrical
efficacy as will be shown later and a small number for the smallest amount of stray
light.
[0033] In the case of a flight control cabin the number of spacings, N, between four and
ten was found suitable. In other cases, values near four or less may be a suitable
compromise when minimising stray light is considered particularly important, or when
a very low D/W ratio is used. Values near ten may be considered more suitable when
a relatively large umbra is required.
[0034] Finally, equations (4) and (5) can be used to derive the upper limits for the angles
on the inner edges of the disks 15. For ease of manufacture, some standardisation
of disk edge angles may be preferred. This would result in the use of angles smaller
than those calculated. Acute angled edges are preferably avoided because of their
greater susceptibility to damage in manufacture and service, as well as the greater
potential injury hazard if the edges are sharp.
[0035] To determine the maximum spacing, S, between adjacent disks 15 of the light'trap,
consider the geometry shown in Figure 3. Imagine a cylindrical body 10 initially with
no disks 15. When to any given point on the inside surface of the cylinder, a ray
is drawn from that point on the lamp face 2 which maximises the incident angle φ.
A second line (to represent a ray diffusely reflected at a maximum value of the angle
θ to an observer) is drawn just clear of the lower edge of the shade body 10 as shown.
Opaque disks 15 of equal radial width T are then located so as to touch those lines.
This will ensure that the region dimensioned S cannot be illuminated directly by the
source 13, and the region dimensioned S
2 is always obscured from the observer's view.
[0036] From consideration of similar triangles containing the angle φ ,

and therefore

[0037] From similar triangles containing the angle θ ,

and because

it follows that

[0038] The maximum spacing between disks 15 which can still prevent observation of a single
diffuse reflection is therefore S
1 plus S
2..Using (6) and (7) this spacing, S
max is

which reduces to

[0039] As the parameter Q varies through a series of values from zero for the uppermost
disk 15, to (H - S
1) for the disk 15 farthest from the lamp 13, the above formula indicates that S
max varies through a corresponding series of values from

[0040] A constant spacing between disks may be desirable for ease of manufacture and the
spacing therefore should not exceed the smaller of these, viz.:

[0041] The number of disks 15 is one fewer than the number of spacings, N, which is determined
by the body length H, divided by the spacing between adjacent disks 15, and - rounding
up if necessary. Therefore if S is determined by equation (2),

When W/
T is selected to be an integer,

[0042] Should the constant spacing be used, the disk farthest from the lamp will be closer
to the shade rim than necessary. The cone semi-angle will then be determined by the
location of the inner edge of that disk. The value for the cone semi-angle would then
be

which would be only a little smaller than the value given in equation (1) above.
[0043] The angles α
1 and α
2 of the sharpened disk edges and the angles β
1 and β
2 are shown in Figures 5 and 7 and can be determined geometrically as follows:

and

Because P = nS where n is the disk number from the open end n = 1 to (N-1) as shown
in Figure 5, and using S from equation (2), the first of these becomes

[0044] Using equation (3), this reduces to

and similarly

[0045] Figure 6 shows the outer edge of the illuminated penumbral region as defined by the
cone semi-angle, γ Coneentric within that region is the umbral region which can be
illuminated by the entire lamp face 2. Its boundary is defined by the angle Ψ as shown.
[0046] For a given {H, W, γ , D} the value of Ψ can be altered somewhat by the choice of
number, size and spacing of disks 15, but Ψ cannot exceed Y . As an indicator of the
relative sizes of cones, it is convenient to define the Penumbral Factor, n , as

[0047] A relatively large value of (approaching unity) would imply a relatively large umbra
and a narrow penumbra; i.e. a sharp cutoff.
[0048] A zero value for would imply a zero value for ψ ; i.e. the umbral region would be
a cylinder centred on the lamp axis and with a diameter equal to the diameter of the
lamp face 2. A negative value of η would imply a negative value of ψ which could only
occur in practice if the outermost disk 15a had an internal diameter smaller than
the diameter of the emitting face 2 of the lamp 13 and if the remaining disks had
internal diameters which increased with decreasing distance from the lamp 13 so as
to avoid vignetting of the extreme umbral rays. In the case of negative η , the umbral
region of illumination extends only for a finite distance from the lamp 13, viz. to
the distance where the extreme umbral rays intersect on the lamp axis. Absorption
of useful light by the shade is greater as η tends towards negative values. The Penumbral
Factor will therefore be an indication of the geometrical efficacy of the shade for
a given cone semi-angle, γ As seen in Figure 6, the umbral cone has a semi-angle ψ,
which is determined by

[0049] The Penumbral Factor can be expanded using equations (10) and (14) to

and by using equation (2) in order to express T in terms of N it follows that

[0050] It is clear that larger values of N and smaller values of D/
W are conductive to larger values of η . However the improvement in n for increasing
N is progressively less (i.e. a diminishing return situation).
[0051] Numerous modifications and variations of the lamp shade construction of Figures 2
to 8 are possible. For example as shown in Figure 9, the diameter of each central
opening in each disk 15 may be slightly larger than the diameter of the central opening
of each disk 15 nearer to the light source 13. The inner edges need not be in a line
from the light source 12 and, in fact, to minimise diffraction effects arising at
the disk inner edges, the inner edges may define a diverging bell shape so that one
line can be drawn from that edge to the lamp face and touching at most one other disk
inner edge. The angle δ in Figure 9 being formed by a tangent to the bell shape at
the lowermost disk 15a may be about 5°.
[0052] As shown in Figure 10, each disk 15 may be provided with a diametrically extending
band 22 so that the cone semi-angle at right angles to the direction of the band 22
is less than the cone semi-angle in the general direction of the band 22. This will
result in a generally elliptical light cone with the major axis along the line of
the bands 22 and minor axis transverse to the bands. This shape of light cone may
be desirable for some applications such as landing lights for military aircraft where
reduced visibility from points displaced laterally from the flight path may be desirable.
[0053] In an alternative embodiment to a cylindrical body 10, the body is in the form of
a truncated hemisphere, with the light source arranged to be located in the largest
diameter portion and the open exit end being provided in the smallest diameter portion,
the shade including a plurality /of baffles in the form of annular disks extending
inwardly of the body.the spacing between the disks reducing towards the open exit
end of the body. This arrangement may be useful in helicopter landing lights to reduce
reflections in to the cockpit and reduce visibility of the helicopter from points
outside the light cone. The hemispherical body is designed for use with existing helicopter
landing light assemblies.
[0054] .The construction of the shade has been described with reference to embodiments where
no direct light and minimal singly reflected light reaches outside the predetermined
light cone. However it would be appreciated that this may be a feature that is found
desirable at only one side of the light, for example where only one window might provide
unwanted reflections. Hence the present invention covers shades which prevent direct
light and reduce reflected light reaching outside the light cone at one side only
of the shade.
1.. A lamp shade for use with a light source and including a hollow tubular body arranged
to be mounted over the light source, the body having an open exit and spaced from
the light source for allowing a light cone tc emerge from the body, the length of
the body being predetermined so that no direct light ray paths from the light source
through the open exit end lie outside a predetermined cone semi-angle, at least one
baffle extending inwardly from the body and arranged so that no part of the inside
surface of the body that is capable of direct illumination by the light source can
be seen through the exit end from a point located substantially outside the light
cone. 2. A .lamp shade according to Claim 1 wherein the body is generally cylindrical
having an upper end for receiving the light source and a lower end defining the open
exit end, the shade including a plurality of the baffles, each baffle being in the
form of an annular disk having a central opening.
3. A lamp shade according to Claim 2 wherein the disk nearest the open exit end is
spaced from that end so that the inner edges of its central opening just touch the
light beam path extending from the furthest part of the light source and passing through
the open exit end at the cone semi-angle.
4. A lamp shade according to Claim 2 wherein the spacing S between adjacent disks
is not more than TH/W, where T is the disk radial width, H is the length of the cylindrical
body from the light source to the open exit end, and W is the diameter of the cylindrical
body.
5. A lamp shade according to Claim 2, 3 or 4 wherein the disks are spaced at constant
intervals along the body and the number of disks equals (N-1), where N is the minimum
number of spacings and is an integer equal to W/T or is the next highest integer above
W/T, where W is the diameter of the cylindrical body and.T is the disk radial width.
6. A lamp shade according to Claim 1 wherein the or each baffle has a sharp inner
edge to minimise reflections therefrom.
7. A lamp shade according to Claim 6 wherein the or each baffle is in the form of
an annular disk with a central opening, the inner edges of the disk defining the central
opening being chamfered at both the upper and lower surfaces of the disk.
8. A lamp shade according to Claim 7 wherein the angle α1 of the chamfer face at the upper surface of the disk is smaller than the smallest
angle β1 of the path from disk inner edge through the open exit end of the body, and the angle
α2 of chamfer face at the disk lower surface is smaller than the .smallest angle β2 of the path from the light source to the edge, all angles α1, α2, β1, β2 being measured relative to the plane of the disk.
9. A lamp s.hade according to Claim 6 wherein the body is generally cylindrical and
the or each baffle is in the form of an annular disk with a central opening, the inner
edges of the disk defining the central opening being turned upwardly towards the light
source at an angle α
β to the plane of the disk, α
β being less than or equal to the larger of α
1 and α
2, where

and

where n is the disk number starting with the disk nearest the open exit end,
N is the number of disks plus 1,
H is the body length,
W is the body diameter,
T is the disk radial width, and
D is the light source diameter,
the upper surface of the disk at the inner edges being chamfered at an angle a to
the plane of the disk, a being less than or equal to the smaller of α
1 and α
2.
10. A lamp shade according to Claim 1 wherein the body is in the form of a truncated
hemisphere with the light source arranged to be located in the largest diameter portion
and the open exit end being provided in the smallest diameter portion, the shade including.a
plurality of baffles in the form of annular disks extending inwardly of the body,
the spacing between the disks reducing towards the open exit end of the body.
11. A lamp shade according to Claim 1 wherein the or each baffle is in the form of
an annular disk having a centrai opening and the or each disk is provided with a diametrically
extending band so that the cone semi-angle at right angles to the direction of the
band is less than the cone semi-angle in the general direction of the band.
12. A lamp shade according to Claim 1 wherein a plurality of baffles are provided,
each baffle being in the form of an annular disk having a central opening, the diameter
of each central opening being slightly larger than the diameter of the central-opening
of each disk nearer to the light source.