(19)
(11) EP 0 061 720 A1

(12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION

(43) Date of publication:
06.10.1982 Bulletin 1982/40

(21) Application number: 82102472.6

(22) Date of filing: 24.03.1982
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC)3C07C 17/14, C07C 21/24
(84) Designated Contracting States:
BE DE FR GB IT NL

(30) Priority: 27.03.1981 US 248599

(71) Applicant: THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY
Midland Michigan 48640-1967 (US)

(72) Inventor:
  • Strom, Robert Michael
    Midland Michigan (US)

(74) Representative: Weickmann, Heinrich, Dipl.-Ing. et al
Patentanwälte H. Weickmann, Dr. K. Fincke F.A. Weickmann, B. Huber Dr. H. Liska, Dr. J. Prechtel, Dr. B. Böhm Postfach 86 08 20
81635 München
81635 München (DE)


(56) References cited: : 
   
       


    (54) Process for the selective aliphatic chlorination of alkylbenzenes


    (57) Alpha-chlorinated cumene derivatives are prepared by chlorinating cumene derivatives in the presence of light. The chlorination may be taken to 100 percent conversion when performed in a solvent, e.g., m-dichlorobenzene.


    Description


    [0001] This invention provides a process for the preparation of an a-chloro cumene derivative. The process comprises adding chlorine to a cumene derivative in the presence of a free radical initiator to preferentially chlorinate the a-position of the alkyl substituent. This preferential chlorination is surprising in that it occurs only at the a-position of essentially all of the alkyl moieties of the cumene derivative, while essentially none of the ring carbons or p-positions of the alkyl substituent are chlorinated. Of particular interest in the practice of this invention is the optional use of an inert aromatic organic solvent which allows the chlorination to be taken to substantially 100 percent conversion without product solidification, thereby obviating the need for starting material recycle streams or the costly separation of unreacted starting material from the product. Surprisingly, when the process is conducted in the presence of an appropriate solvent, essentially complete conversion of the cumene derivative to its chlorinated analogs is obtained without a substantial reduction in selectivity of a-chlorination. The a-chlorinated cumene product is useful as an intermediate in the manufacture of herbicides and other biologically active chemicals.

    [0002] The cumene derivatives advantageously employed are represented by Formula I

    wherein X is a halogen, or any electron-withdrawing group which does not react with chlorine, such as -CF3, -CC13 or -N02; and n is an integer from 1 to 5. Preferably, X is chlorine and n is 2. The most preferred cumene derivative is 3,5-dichlorocumene.

    [0003] A suitable halogen or any agent that is capable of generating a chlorine atom, such as a suitable chlorine-containing solid or liquid, can be used as the chlorinating agent. Chlorine is the most preferred chlorinating agent. Chlorine atoms are preferably supplied at a ratio of from 0.5 to 1.1 moles of chlorine atoms per mole of cumene derivative. While excess chlorinating agent can be employed, too large an excess, for example, greater than 1.5 moles of chlorine atoms per mole of cumene derivative, may lead to some chlorination of the p carbon(s), as discussed hereinbefore.

    [0004] Suitable free radical initiators include ultraviolet light and catalysts, such as peroxides. In the case of a peroxide, a sufficient quantity is used to cause halogenation of the a carbon. If a peroxide such as benzoyl peroxide is used, it is conveniently added to the reactants along with an optional solvent as hereinafter described. If employed, the peroxide is used in an amount between 0.005 and 0.05 mole of peroxide per mole of cumene derivative.

    [0005] The process of this invention is preferably conducted in a chlorinated aromatic solvent, especially the dichlorobenzenes, most preferably, it is conducted in m-dichlorobenzene, although other aromatic solvents such as, for example, benzene or monochlorobenzene may be used, if desired. For the purposes of this invention, an inert solvent is a solvent which does not interfere with the selective a-chlorination of the cumene derivative being used. When solvent is employed, it is used in amounts such that-the resultant product does not precipitate from solution, preferably from 0.25 to 0.8 mole of solvent per mole of cumene derivative. When no solvent is employed, the product crystallizes before complete conversion is reached. Thus, in a solventless system, crystallized product must be removed in order to obtain essentially complete conversion.

    [0006] The selective, aliphatic chlorination step is advantageously conducted in the liquid phase at a temperature of between 0° and 30°C, and preferably between 4° and 15°C. The chlorination step is preferably conducted in the presence of mild agitation sufficient to maintain an essentially homogeneous mixture of the reactants.

    [0007] In conducting the chlorination step, neither the rate of chlorine addition nor the order of addition of the reactants is critical provided that at any time during the reaction, no more than 0.05 mole of chlorinating agent is present per mole of cumene derivative. A typical chlorination step generally requires from 1 to 2 hours.

    [0008] The selective, aliphatic chlorination of a cumene derivative can be taken to essentially complete conversion when conducted in the appropriate solvent to yield the a-chlorinated cumene derivative. This obviates the need to separate the product from the initial reactants. The product is separable from the aromatic solvent by known crystallization techniques.

    [0009] The instant reaction method requires no more time than similar prior methods. Generally speaking, however, the rate of conversion for a reaction of this type decreases as reaction temperature decreases. Therefore, it is surprising that the instant method is not more time consuming yet proceeds at a lower temperature than prior methods.

    [0010] For the purposes of this invention, conversion refers to the elimination of the cumene derivative from the reaction mixture. For example, in the practice of this invention, 3,5-dichlorocumene is essentially completely converted to the compounds listed in Example 1. At essentially complete conversion of the reactant in the practice of this invention, the reaction is considered to be selective if at least 80 mole percent of the cumene derivative is converted to the a-chloro cumene derivative and/or its dehydrohalogenated analogue, preferably at least 90 mole percent, most preferably at least 92 mole percent.

    [0011] The following examples further illustrate the invention. All percentages in the examples are by weight unless otherwise indicated.

    Example 1



    [0012] In a 300-milliliter vessel equipped with a dip tube, a stirring means and a cooling means, a mixture is formed by adding to the vessel with stirring 73 g of 3,5-dichlorocumene and 32 g of m-dichlorobenzene. The mixture is cooled to 5°C and is then stirred while simultaneously being sparged with gaseous nitrogen for 15 minutes. A 275 watt mercury vapor/incandescent lamp is placed about 1 inch from the vessel. Gaseous chlorine is then introduced at approximately one gram per minute through the dip tube.

    [0013] The mixture is analyzed periodically using gas chromatography, and chlorine addition is stopped when 3,5-dichlorocumene no longer can be detected. At this point 28 minutes have elapsed since chlorine addition started. Yields are determined by dehydrochlorination of the a-chloro-3,5-dichlorocumene followed by comparison with authentic 3,5-dichloro-a-methylstyrene. The yield of a-chloro-3,5-dichlorocumene is about 92 mole percent, including that which is present as 3,5--dichloro-a-methylstyrene, and no solids are observed. This indicates high correlation between conversion to the a-chloro product and selectivity, because conversion is approximately 100 percent and selectivity is 92 percent from 3,5-dichlorocumene to a-chloro-3,5-dichlorocumene, including that present as 3,5-dichloro-a-methylstyrene. The final reaction mixture contains 3,5-dichloro-a-methylstyrene, a-chloro-3,5-dichlorocumene, p-chloro-3,5--dichlorocumene and a,p-dichloro-3,5-dichlorocumene.

    Example 2



    [0014] The procedure of the first example is followed except that no m-dichlorobenzene (solvent) is employed, and the mass of 3,5-dichlorocumene is increased to 277 g. The 3,5-dichlorocumene is added to the vessel first. Gaseous chlorine is then introduced at approximately one gram per minute. The temperature of the vessel is maintained at 6°C. The vessel contents solidify when 100 g of chlorine has been added. No further chlorine is added. The vessel contains about 77.5 percent a-chloro--3,5-dichlorocumene, about 11 percent 3,5-dichlorocumene, about 2 percent 3,5-dichloro-a-methylstyrene, and about 5.5 percent p- and a,p-chlorinated-3,5-dichlorocumene.

    [0015] The lack of a solvent causes the 3,5-dichlorocumene reaction mixture to solidify before complete conversion is attained. However, as noted, selectivity was high.

    Comparative Experiment


    (Not an example of this invention)



    [0016] Following the procedure of the first example and using the apparatus described therein, 55 g of 3,5-dichlorocumene and 100 ml of 1,2-dichlorotetrafluoroethane are added to the vessel. Analysis by gas chromatography shows that no 3,5-dichlorocumene is present 23 minutes after chlorine is first added. Further, the analysis shows the yield of a-chloro-3,5-dichlorocumene to be 71.6 mole percent, indicating a lack of selectivity to the a position.

    [0017] This comparative experiment shows that 1,2--dichlorotetrafluoroethane is not a useful solvent for this invention because it interferes with the selective a-chlorination of 3,5-dichlorocumene.


    Claims

    1. A process for the preparation of a-chlorinated cumene derivatives, characterized by contacting a cumene derivative represented by formula I

    wherein n is a whole number from 1 to 5, and X is a halogen or an electron-withdrawing group which does not react with chlorine, in the presence of a free radical initiator, with chlorine.
     
    2. Process of Claim 1 characterized in that the process is carried out in an inert aromatic solvent.
     
    3. The process of Claim 1 characterized in that the free radical initiator is ultraviolet light.
     
    4. The process of Claim 1 characterized in that the process is conducted at a temperature between 0° and 30°C.
     
    5. The process of any one of Claims 1 to 4 characterized in that the process is carried out at a temperature between 4° and 15°C.
     
    6. The process of Claim 5 characterized in that the ratio of moles of chlorine atoms to moles of cumene derivative is from 0.5 to 1.1, with the proviso that no more than 0.05 mole of chlorine is present at any point in time per mole of cumene derivative.
     
    7. The process of Claim 6 characterized in that the aromatic solvent is m-dichlorobenzene.
     
    8. The process of Claim 7 characterized in that the cumene derivative has one X group in either the 3 or 4 position on the ring.
     
    9. The process of Claim 8 characterized in that X is chlorine and n is 2.
     
    10. The process of Claim 9 characterized in that the cumene derivative is 3,5-dichlorocumene and the resultant product is a-chloro-3,5-dichlorocumene.
     





    Search report