BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0001] The present invention relates to crystalline thermoplastic articles such as fibers
or films having high tenacity, modulus and toughness values and a process for their
production which includes a gel intermediate.
[0002] The preparation of high strength, high modulus polyethylene fibers by growth from
dilute solution has been described by U.S. Patent 4,137,394 to Meihuizen et al. (1979)
and pending U.S. application Serial No. 225,288 filed January 15, 1981.
[0003] Alternative methods to the preparation of high strength fibers have been described
in various recent publications of P. Smith, A. J. Pennings and their coworkers. German
Off. 3004699 to Smith et al. (Aug. 21, 1980) describes a process in which polyethylene
is first dissolved in a volatile solvent, the solution is spun and cooled to form
a gel filament, and finally the gel filament is simultaneously stretched and dried
to form the desired fiber.
[0004] UK Patent application GB 2,051,667 to P. Smith and P. J. Lemstra (Jan. 21, 1981)
discloses a process in which a solution of the polymer is spun and the filaments are
drawn at a stretch ratio which is related to the polymer molecular weight, at a drawing
temperature such that at the draw ratio used the modulus of the filaments is at least
20 GPa. The application notes that to obtain the high modulus values required, drawing
must be performed below the melting point of the polyethylene. The drawing temperature
is in general at most 135°C.
[0005] Kalb and Pennings in Polymer Bulletin, vol. 1, pp. 879-80 (1979), Polymer, 2584-90
(1980) and Smook et al. in Polymer Bull., vol. 2, pp. 775-83 (1980) describe a process
in which the polyethylene is dissolved in a nonvolatile solvent (paraffin oil) and
the solution is cooled to room temperature to form a gel. The gel is cut into pieces,
fed to an extruder and spun into a gel filament. The gel filament is extracted with
hexane to remove the paraffin oil, vacuum dried and then stretched to form the desired
fiber.
[0006] In the process described by Smook et.al. and
Kalb and Pennings, the filaments were non-uniform, were of high porosity and could
not be stretched continuously to prepare fibers of indefinite length.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0007] The present invention includes a process for producing a shaped thermoplastic article
of substantially indefinite length (such as a fiber or film) which comprises the steps:
a) forming a solution of a thermoplastic crystalline polymer selected from the group
consisting of polyethylene, polypropylene, polyoxymethylene, polybutene-1, poly(vinylidine
fluoride) and poly-4-methylpentene-1 in a first, nonvolatile solvent at a first concentration
by weight of polymer per unit weight of first solvent, said thermoplastic polymer
having a weight average molecular length between 7 x 104 and 80 x 104 backbone atoms and the solubility of said thermoplastic polymer in said first solvent
at a first temperature being at least said first concentration;
b) extruding said solution through an aperture, said solution being at a temperature
no less than said first temperature upstream of the aperture and being substantially
at the first concentration both upstream and downstream of the aperture,
c) cooling the solution adjacent to and downstream of the aperture to a second temperature
below the temperature at which a rubbery gel is formed, forming a gel containing first
solvent of substantially indefinite length,
d) extracting the gel containing first solvent with a second, volatile solvent for
a sufficient contact time to form a gel containing second solvent which gel is substantially
free of first solvent and is of substantially indefinite length;
e) drying the gel containing second solvent to form a xerogel of substantially indefinite
length free of first and second solvent; and
f) stretching at least one of:
(i) the gel containing the first solvent,
(ii) the gel containing the second solvent and,
(iii) the xerogel,
at a total stretch ratio:
(i) in the case of polyethylene which is sufficient to achieve a tenacity of at least
20 g/denier and a modulus of at least 600 g/denier, and
(ii) in the case of polypropylene which is sufficient to achieve a tenacity of at
least 10 g/denier and a modulus of at least 180 g/denier, and
(iii) in the case of polyoxymethylene, polybutene-1, poly(vinylidene fluoride) or
poly (4-methylpentene-1) of at least 10:1.
[0008] The present invention also includes a polyethylene fiber of substantially indefinite
length being of weight average molecular weight at least 500,000 and having a tenacity
of at least 20 g/denier, a tensile modulus at least 500 g/denier, a creep value no
more than 5
% (when measured at 10% of breaking load for 50 days at 23°C), a porosity less than
10% and a melting temperature of at least 147°C.
[0009] The present invention also includes a polyethylene fiber of substantially indefinite
length being of weight average molecular weight of at least 1,000,000 and having a
tensile modulus of at least 1600 g/denier, a melting point of at least 147°C and an
elongation-to-break of not more than 5%.
[0010] The present invention also includes a polypropylene fiber of substantially indefinite
length being of weight average molecular weight of at least 750,000 and having a tenacity
of at least 8 g/denier, a tensile modulus of at least 160 g/denier and a melting temperature
of at least 168°C.
[0011] The present invention also includes a polyolefin gel fiber of substantially indefinite
length comprising between 4 and 20 weight % solid polyethylene of weight average molecular
weight at least 500,000 or solid polypropylene of weight average molecular weight
at least 750,000, and between 80 and 96 weight %" of a swelling solvent miscible with
high boiling hydrocarbon and having an atmospheric boiling point less than 50°C.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
[0012]
Figure 1 is a graphic view of the tenacities of polyethylene fibers prepared according
to Examples 3-99 of the present invention versus calculated valves therefore as indicated
in the Examples. The numbers indicate multiple points.
Figure 2 is a graphic view of the calculated tenacities of polyethylene fibers prepared
according to the present invention as a function of polymer concentration and draw
ratio at a constant temperature of 140°C.
Figure 3 is a graphic view of the calculated tenacities of polyethylene fibers prepared
according to the present invention as a function of draw temperature and draw (or
stretch) ratio at a constant polymer concentration of 4%.
Figure 4 is a graphic view of tenacity plotted against tensile modulus for polyethylene
fibers prepared in accordance with the present invention.
Figure 5 is a schematic view of a first process embodiment of the present invention.
Figure 6 is a schematic view of a second process embodiment of the present invention.
Figure 7 is a schematic view of a third process embodiment of the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0013] There are many applications which require a load bearing element of high strength,
modulus, toughness, dimensional and hydrolytic stability and high resistance to creep
under sustained loads.
[0014] For example, marine ropes and cables, such as the mooring lines used to secure supertankers
to loading stations and the cables used to secure deep sea drilling platforms to underwater
anchorage, are presently constructed of materials such as nylon, polyester, aramids
and steel which are subject to hydrolytic or corrosive attack by sea water. In consequence
such mooring lines and cables are constructed with significant safety factors and
are replaced frequently. The greatly increased weight and the need for frequent replacement
create substantial operational and economic burdens.
[0015] The fibers and films of this invention are of high strength, extraordinarily high
modulus and great toughness. They are dimensionally and hydrolytically stable and
resistant to creep under sustained loads.
[0016] The fibers and films of the invention prepared according to the present process possess
these properties in a heretofore unattained combination, and are therefore quite novel
and useful materials.
[0017] Other applications for the fibers and films of this invention include reinforcements
in thermoplastics, thermosetting resins, elastomers and concrete for uses such as
pressure vessels, hoses, power transmission belts, sports and automotive equipment,
and building construction.
[0018] In comparison to the prior art fibers prepared by Smith, Lemstra and Pennings described
in Off 30 04 699, GB 205,1667 and other cited references, the strongest fibers of
the present invention are of higher melting point, higher tenacity and much higher
modulus. Additionally, thay are more uniform, and less porous than the prior art fibers.
[0019] In comparison with Off 30 04 699 to Smith et.al. the process of the present invention
has the advantage of greater controllability and reliability in that the steps of
drying and stretching may be separate and each step may be carried out under optimal
conditions. To illustrate, Smith & Lemstra in Polymer Bulletin, vol. 1, pp. 733-361
(1979) indicate that drawing temperature, below 143°C, had no effect on the relationships
between either tenacity or modulus and stretch ratio. As will be seen, the properties
of the fibers of the present invention may be controlled in part by varying stretch
temperature with other factors held constant.
[0020] In comparison with the procedures described by Smook et.al in Polymer Bulletin, vol.
2, pp. 775-83 (1980) and in the above Kalb and Pennings articles, the process of the
present invention has the advantage that the intermediate gel fibers which are spun
are of uniform concentration and this concentration is the same as the polymer solution
as prepared. The advantages of this unformity are illustrated by the fact that the
fibers of the present invention may be stretched in a continuous operation to prepare
packages of indefinite length. Additionally, the intermediate xerogel fibers of the
present invention preferably contain less than 10 volume
% porosity compared to 23-65% porosity in the dry gel fibers described by Smook et
al. and Kalb and Pennings.
[0021] The crystallizable polymer used in the present invention may be a polyolefin such
as polyethylene, polypropylene or poly(methylpentene-1) or may be another polymer
such as poly(oxymethylene) or poly(vinylidene fluoride). In the case of polyethylene,
suitable polymers have molecular weights (by intrinsic viscosity) in the range of
one to ten million. This corresponds to a weight average chain length of 3.6 x 10
4 to 3.6 x 10
5 monomer units or 7 x 10
4 to 7.1 x 10
5 carbons. Other polyolefins and poly(haloolefins) should have similar backbone carbon
chain lengths. For polymers such as poly(oxymethylene) the total chain length should
preferably be in the same general range, i.e. 7 x 10
4 to 71 x 10
4 atoms, with some adjustment possible due to the differences in bond angles between
C-C-C and C-O-C.
[0022] The weight average molecular weight of polyethylene used is at least 500,000 (6 IV),
preferably at least 1,000,000 (10 IV), and more preferably between 2,000,000 (16 IV)
and 8,000,000 (42 IV). The weight average molecular weight of polypropylene used is
at least 750,000 (5 IV), preferably at least 1,000,000 (6 IV), more preferably at
least 1,500,000 (9 IV) and most preferably between 2,000,000 (11 IV) and 8,000,000
(33 IV). The IV numbers represent intrinsic viscosity of the polymer in decalin at
135°C.
[0023] The first solvent should be non-volatile under the processing conditions. This is
necessary in order to maintain essentially constant the concentration of solvent upstream
and through the aperture (die) and to prevent non-uniformity in liquid content of
the gel fiber or film containing first solvent. Preferably, the vapor pressure of
the first solvent should be no more than 20 kPa (one-fifth of an atmosphere) at 175°C,
or at the first temperature. Preferred first solvents for hydrocarbon polymers are
aliphatic and aromatic hydrocarbons of the desired non-volatility and solubility for
the polymer. The polymer may be present in the first solvent at a first concentration
which is selected from a relatively narrow range, e.g. 2 to 15 weight percent, preferably
4 to 10 weight percent and more preferably 5 to 8 weight percent; however, once chosen,
the concentration should not vary adjacent the die or otherwise prior to cooling to
the second temperature. The concentration should also remain reasonably constant over
time (i.e. length of the fiber or film).
[0024] The first temperature is chosen to achieve complete dissolution of the polymer in
the first solvent. The first temperature is the minimum temperature at any point between
where the solution is formed and the die face, and must be greater than the gelation
temperature for the polymer in the solvent at the first concentration. For polyethylene
in paraffin oil at 5-15% concentration, the gelation temperature is approximately
100-130"C
? therefore, a preferred first temperature can be between 180°C and 250°C, more preferably
200-240. While temperatures may vary above the first temperature at various points
upstream of the die face, excessive temperatures causitive of polymer degradation
should be avoided. To assure complete solubility, a first temperature is chosen whereat
the solubility of the polymer exceeds the first concentration, and is typically at
least 100% greater. The second temperature is chosen whereas the solubility of the
polymer is much less than the first concentration. Preferably, the solubility of the
polymer in the first solvent at the second temperature is no more than 1% of the first
concentration. Cooling of the extruded polymer solution from the first temperature
to the second temperature should be accomplished at a rate sufficiently rapid to form
a gel fiber which is of substantially the same polymer concentration as existed in
the polymer solution. Preferably the rate at which the extruded polymer solution is
cooled from the first temperature to the second temperature should be at least 50°C
per minute.
[0025] Some stretching during cooling to the second temperature is not excluded from the
present invention, but the total stretching during this stage should not normally
exceed 2:1, and preferably no more than 1.5:1. As a result of those factors the gel
fiber formed upon cooling to the second temperature consists of a continuous polymeric
network highly swollen with solvent. The gel usually has regions of high and low polymer
density on a microscopic level but is generally free of large (greater than 500 nm)
regions void of solid polymer.
[0026] If an aperture of circular cross section (or other cross section without a major
axis in the plane perpendicular to the flow direction more than 8 times the smallest
axis in the same plane, such as oval, Y- or X-shaped aperature) is used, then both
gels will be gel fibers, the xerogel will be an xerogel fiber and the thermoplastic
article will be a fiber. The diameter of the aperture is not critical, with representative
aperatures being between 0.25 mm and 5 mm in diameter (or other major axis). The length
of the aperture in the flow direction should normally be at least 10 times the diameter
of the aperture (or other similar major axis), perferably at least 15 times and more
preferably at least 20 times the diameter (or other similar major axis).
[0027] If an aperture of rectangular cross section is used, then both gels will be gel films,
the xerogel will be a xerogel film and the thermoplastic article will be a film. The
width and height of the aperture are not critical, with representative apertures being
between 2.5 mm and 2 m in width (corresponding to film width), between 0.25 mm and
5 mm in height (corresponding to film thickness). The depth of the aperture (in the
flow direction) should normally be at least 10 times the height of the aperture, preferably
at least 15 times the height and more preferably at least 20 times the height.
[0028] The extraction with second solvent is conducted in a manner that replaces the first
solvent in the gel with second solvent without significant changes in gel structure.
Some swelling or shrinkage of the gel may occur, but preferably no substantial dissolution,
coagulation or precipitation of the polymer occurs.
[0029] When the first solvent is a hydrocarbon, suitable second solvents include hydrocarbons,
chlorinated hydrocarbons, chlorofluorinated hydrocarbons and others, such as pentane,
hexane, heptane, toluene, methylene chloride, carbon tetrachloride, trichlorotrifluoroethane
(TCTFE), diethyl ether and dioxane.
[0030] The most preferred second solvents are methylene chloride (B.P. 39.8°C) and TCFE
(B.P. 47.5°C). Preferred second solvents are the non-flammable volatile solvents having
an atmospheric boiling point below 80°C, more preferably below 70°C and most preferably
below 50°C. Conditions of extraction should remove the first solvent to less than
1% of the total solvent in the gel.
[0031] A preferred combination of conditions is a first temperature between 150°C and 250°C,
a second temperature between -40°C and 40°C and a cooling rate between the first temperature
and the second temperature of at least 50°C/minute. It is preferred that the first
solvent be a hydrocarbon, when the polymer is a polyolefin such as ultrahigh molecular
weight polyethylene. The first solvent should be substantially non-volatile, one measure
of which is that its vapor pressure at the first temperature should be less than one-fifth
atmosphere (20 kPa), and more preferably less than 2 kPa.
[0032] In choosing the first and second solvents, the primary desired difference relates
to volatility as discussed above. It is also preferred that the polymers be less soluble
in the second solvent at 40°C than in the first solvent at 150°C.
[0033] Once the gel containing second solvent is formed, it is then dried under conditions
where the second solvent is removed leaving the solid network of polymer substantially
intact. By analogy to silica gels, the resultant material is called herein a "xerogel"
meaning a solid matrix corresponding to the solid matrix of a wet gel, with the liquid
replaced by gas (e.g. by an inert gas such as nitrogen or by air). The term "xerogel"
is not intended to delineate any particular type of surface area, porosity or pore
size.
[0034] A comparison of the xerogels of the present invention with corresponding dried gel
fibers prepared according to prior art indicates the following major differences in
structure: The dried xerogel fibers of the present invention preferably contain less
than ten volume percent pores compared to approximately 55 volume percent pores in
the Kalb and Pennings dried gel fibers and approximately 23-65 volume percent pores
in the Smook et al. dried gel fibers. The dried xerogel fibers of the present invention
show a surface area (by the B.E.T. technique) of less than 1 m
2/g as compared to 28.8 m
2/g in a fiber prepared by the prior art method (see Comparative Example 1 and Example
2, below).
[0035] The xerogel fibers of the present invention are also novel compared to dry, unstretched
fibers of GB 2,051,667 and Off. 3004699 and related articles by Smith and Lemstra.
This difference is evidenced by the deleterious effect of stretching below 75°C or
above 135°C upon the Smith and Lemstra unstretched fibers. In comparison, stretching
of the present xerogel fibers at room temperature and above 135°C has beneficial rather
than deleterious effects (see, for example, Examples 540-542, below). While the physical
nature of these differences are not clear because of lack of information about Smith
and Lemstra's unstretched fibers, it appears that one or more of the following characteristics
of the present xerogel fibers must be lacking in Smith and Lemstra's unstretched fibers:
(1) a crystalline orientation function less than 0.2, and preferably less than 0.1
as measured by wide angle X-ray diffraction; (2) microporosity less than 10% and preferrably
less than 3%; (3) a crystallinity index as measured by wide angle X-ray diffraction
(see
P. H. Hermans and A. Weidinger, Macromol. Chem. vol. 44, p. 24 (1961)) less than 80%
and preferably less than 75%; (4) no detectable fraction of the triclinic crystalline
form and (5) a fraction variation of the spherulite size across a diameter of the
fiber less than 0.25.
[0036] Stretching may be performed upon the gel fiber after cooling to the second temperature
or during or after extraction. Alternatively, stretching of the xerogel fiber may
be conducted, or a combination of gel stretch and xerogel stretch may be performed.
The stretching may be conducted in a single stage or it may be conducted in two or
more stages. The first stage stretching may be conducted at room temperatures or at
an elevated temperature. Preferably the stretching is conducted in two or more stages
with the last of the stages performed at a temperature between 120°C and 160°C. Most
preferably the stretching is conducted in at least two stages with the last of the
stages performed at a temperature between 135°C and 150°C. The Examples, and especially
Examples 3-99 and 111-486, illustrate how the stretch ratios can be related to obtaining
particular fiber properties.
[0037] The product polyethylene fibers produced by the present process represent novel articles
in that they include fibers with a unique combination of properties: a modulus at
least 500 g/denier (preferably at least 1000 g/denier, more preferably at least 1600
g/denier and most preferably at least 2000 g/denier), a tenacity at least 20 g/denier
(preferably at least 30 g/denier and more preferably at least 40 g/denier), a melting
temperature of at least 147°C (preferably at least 149°C), a porosity of no more than
10% (preferably no more than 6
%) and a creep value no more than 5% (preferably no more than 3%) when measured at
10% of breaking load for 50 days at 23°C. Preferably the fiber has an elongation to
break at most 7%. In addition, the fibers have high toughness and uniformity. These
additional properties can be measured as a workto-break value preferably at least
7.5 gigajoules per cubic meter. Furthermore, as indicated in Examples 3-99 and 111-489
below, trade-offs between various properties can be made in a controlled fashion with
the present process.
[0038] The novel polypropylene fibers of the present invention also include a unique combination
of properties, previously unachieved for polypropylene fibers: a tenacity of at least
8 g/denier (preferably at least 11 g/denier and more preferably at least 13 g/denier),
a tensile modulus at least 160 g/denier (preferably at least 200 g/denier), a main
melting point at least 168°C (preferably at least 170°C) and a porosity less than
10% (preferably no more than 5%). Preferably, the polypropylene fibers also have an
elongation to break less than 20%.
[0039] Additionally a novel class of fibers of the invention are polypropylene fibers possessing
a modulus of at least 200 g/denier, preferably at least 220 g/denier.
[0040] The gel fibers containing first solvent, gel fibers containing second solvent and
xerogel fibers of the present invention also represent novel articles of manufacture,
distinguished from somewhat similar products described by Smook et al. and by
Kalb and Pennings in having a volume porosities of 10% or less compared to values of
23%-65% in the references.
[0041] In particular the second gel fibers differ from the comparable prior art materials
in having a solvent with an atmospheric boiling point less than 50°C. As indicated
by Examples 100-108, below, the uniformity and cylindrical shape of the xerogel fibers
improved progressively as the boiling point of the second solvent declined. As also
indicated in Examples 100-108 (see Table III), substantially higher tenacity fibers
were produced under equivalent drying and stretching conditions by using trichlorotrifluoroethane
(boiling point 47.5°C) as the second solvent compared to fibers produced by using
hexane (boiling point 68.
7°C) as second solvent. The improvement in final fiber is then directly attributable
to changes in the second solvent in the second gel fiber. Preferred such second solvents
are halogenated hydrocarbons of the proper boiling point such as methylene chloride
(dichloromethane) and trichlorotrifluoroethane, with the latter being most preferred.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
[0042] Figure 5 illustrates in schematic form a first embodiment of the present invention,
wherein the stretching step F is conducted in two stages on the xerogel fiber subsequent
to drying step E. In Figure 5, a first mixing vessel 10 is shown, which is fed with
an ultra high molecular weight polymer 11 such as polyethylene of weight average molecular
weight at least 500,000 and preferably at least 1,000,000, and to which is also fed
a first, relatively non-volatile solvent 12 such as paraffin oil. First mixing vessel
10 is equipped with an agitator 13. The residence time of polymer and first solvent
in first mixing vessel 10 is sufficient to form a slurry containing some dissolved
polymer and some relatively finely divided polymer particles, which slurry is removed
in line 14 to an intensive mixing vessel 15. Intensive mixing vessel 15 is equipped
with helical agitator blades 16. The residence time and agitator speed in intensive
mixing vessel 15 is sufficient to convert the slurry into a solution. It will be appreciated
that the temperature in intensive mixing vessel 15, either because of external heating,
heating of the slurry 14, heat generated by the intensive mixing, or a combination
of the above is sufficiently high (e.g. 200°C) to permit the polymer to be completely
dissolved in the solvent at the desired concentration (generally between 6 and 10
percent polymer, by weight of solution). From the intensive mixing vessel 15, the
solution is fed to an extrusion device 18, containing a barrel 19 within which is
a screw 20 operated by motor 22 to deliver polymer solution at reasonably high pressure
to a gear pump and housing 23 at a controlled flow rate. A motor 24 is provided to
drive gear pump 23 and extrude the polymer solution, still hot, through a spinnerette
25 comprising a plurality of aperatures, which may be circular, X-shaped, or, oval-shaped,
or in any of a variety of shapes having a relatively small major axis in the plane
of the spinnerette when it is desired to form fibers, and having a rectangular or
other shape with an extended major axis in the plane of the spinnerette when it is
desired to form films. The temperature of the solution in the mixing vessel 15, in
the extrusion device 18 and at the spinnerette 25 should all equal or exceed a first
temperature (e.g. 200°C) chosen to exceed the gellation temperature (approximately
100-130°C for polyethylene in paraffin oil). The temperature may vary (e.g. 220°C,
210°C and 200°C) or may be constant (e.g. 220°C) from the mixing vessel 15 to extrusion
device 18 to the spinnerette 25. At all points, however, the concentration of polymer
in the solution should be substantially the same. The number of aperatures, and thus
the number of fibers formed, is not critical, with convenient numbers of apperatures
being 16, 120, or 240.
[0043] From the spinnerette 25, the polymer solution passes through an air gap 27, optionally
enclosed and filled with an inert gas such as nitrogen, and optionally provided with
a flow of gas to facilitate cooling. A plurality of gel fibers 28 containing first
solvent pass through the air gap 27 and into a quench bath 30, so as to cool the fibers,
both in the air gap 27 and in the quench bath 30, to a second temperature at which
the solubility of the polymer in the first solvent is relatively low, such that most
of the polymer precipitates as a gel material. While some stretching in the air gap
27 is permissible, it is preferably less than 2:1, and is more preferably much lower.
Substantial stretching of the hot gel fibers in air gap 27 is believed highly detrimental
to the properties of the ultimate fibers.
[0044] It is preferred that the quench liquid in quench bath 30 be water. While the second
solvent may be used as the quench fluid (and quench bath 30 may even be integral with
solvent extraction device 37 described below), it has been found in limited testing
that such a modification impairs fiber properties.
[0045] Rollers 31 and 32 in the quench bath 30 oper- rate to feed the fiber through the
quench bath, and preferably operate with little or no stretch. In the event that some
stretching does occur across rollers 31 and 32, some first solvent exudes out of the
fibers and can be collected as a top layer in quench bath 30.
[0046] From the quench bath 30, the cool first gel fibers 33 pass to a solvent extraction
device 37 where a second solvent, being of relatively low boiling such as trichlorotrifluoroethane,
is fed in through line 38. The solvent outflow in line 40 contains second solvent
and essentially all of the first solvent brought in with the cool gel fibers 33, either
dissolved or dispersed in the second solvent. Thus the second gel fibers 41 conducted
out of the solvent extraction device 37 contain substantially only second solvent,
and relatively little first solvent. The second gel fibers 41 may have shrunken somewhat
compared to the first gel fibers 33, but otherwise contain substantially the same
polymer morphology.
[0047] In a drying device 45, the second solvent is evaporated from the second gel fibers
41 forming essentially unstretched xerogel fibers 47 which are taken up on spool 52.
[0048] From spool 52, or from a plurality of such spools if it is desired to operate the
stretching line at a slower feed rate than the take up of spool 52 permits, the fibers
are fed over driven feed roll 54 and idler roll 55 into a first heated tube 56, which
may be rectangular, cylindrical or other convenient shape. Sufficient heat is applied
to the tube 56 to cause the internal temperature to be between 120 and 140°C. The
fibers are stretched at a relatively high draw ratio (e.g. 10:1) so as to form partially
stretched fibers
58 taken up by driven roll 61 and idler roll 62. From rolls 61 and 62, the fibers are
taken through a second heated tube 63, heated so as to be at somewhat higher temperature,
e.g. 130-160°C and are then taken up by driven take-up roll 65 and idler roll 66,
operating at a speed suficient to impart a stretch ratio in heated tube 63 as desired,
e.g. 2.5:1. The twice stretched fibers 68 produced in this first embodiment are taken
up on take-up spool 72.
[0049] With reference to the six process steps of the present invention, it can be seen
that the solution forming step A is conducted in mixers 13 and 15. The extruding step
B is conducted with device 18 and 23, and especially through spinnerette 25. The cooling
step C is conducted in airgap 27 and quench bath 30. Extraction step D is conducted
in solvent extraction device 37. The drying step E is conducted in drying device 45.
The stretching step F is conducted in elements 52-72, and especially in heated tubes
56 and 63. It will be appreciated, however, that various other parts of the system
may also perform some stretching, even at temperatures substantially below thase of
heated tubes 56 and 63. Thus, for example, some stretching (e.g. 2:1) may occur within
quench bath 30, within solvent extraction device 37, within drying device 45 or between
solvent extraction device 37 and drying device 45.
[0050] A second embodiment of the present invention is illustrated in schematic form by
Figure 6. The solution forming and extruding steps A and B of the second embodiment
are substantially the same as those in the first embodiment illustrated in Figure
5. Thus, polymer and first solvent are mixed in first mixing vessel 10 and conducted
as a slurry in line 14 to intensive mixing device 15 operative to form a hot solution
of polymer in first solvent. Extrusion device 18 impells the solution under pressure
through the gear pump and housing 23 and then through a plurality of apperatures in
spinnerette 27. The hot first gel fibers 28 pass through air gap 27 and quench bath
30 so as to form cool first gel fibers 33.
[0051] The cool first gel fibers 33 are conducted over driven roll 54 and idler roll 55
through a heated tube 57 which, in general, is longer than the first heated tube 56
illustrated in Figure 5. The length of heated tube 57 compensates, in general, for
the higher velocity of fibers 33 in the second embodiment of Figure 6 compared to
the velocity of xerogel fibers (47) between take-up spool 52 and heated tube 56 in
the first embodiment of Figure 5. The fibers 33 are drawn through heated tube 57 by
driven take-up roll 59 and idler roll 60, so as to cause a relatively high stretch
ratio (e.g. 10:1). The once-stretched first gel fibers 35 are conducted into extraction
device 37.
[0052] In the extraction device 37, the first solvent is extracted out of the gel fibers
by second solvent and the gel fibers 42 containing second solvent are conducted to
a drying device 45. There the second solvent is evaporated from the gel fibers; and
xerogel fibers 48, being once-stretched, are taken up on spool 52.
[0053] Fibers on spool 52 are then taken up by driven feed roll 61 and idler 62 and passed
through a heated tube 63, operating at the relatively high temperature of between
130 and 160°C. The fibers are taken up by driven take up roll 65 and idler roll 66
operating at a speed sufficient to impart a stretch in heated tube 63 as desired,
e.g. 2.5:1. The twice-stretched fibers 69 produced in the second embodiment are then
taken up on spool 72.
[0054] It will be appreciated that, by comparing the embodiment of Figure 6 with the embodiment
of Figure 5, the stretching step F has been divided into two parts, with the first
part conducted in heated tube 57 performed on the first gel fibers 33 prior to extraction
(D) and drying (E), and the second part conducted in heated tube 63, being conducted
on xerogel fibers 48 subsequent to drying (E).
[0055] The third embodiment of the present invention is illustrated in Figure 7, with the
solution forming step A, extrusion step B, and cooling step C being substantially
identical to the first embodiment of Figure 5 and the second embodiment of Figure
6. Thus, polymer and first solvent are mixed in first mixing vessel 10 and conducted
as a slurry in line 14 to intensive mixing device 15 operative to form a hot solution
of polymer in first solvent. Extrusion device 18 impells the solution under pressure
through the gear pump and housing 23 and then through a plurality of apperatures in
spinnerette 27. The hot first gel fibers 28 pass through air gap 27 and quench bath
30 so as to form cool first gel fibers 33.
[0056] The cool first gel fibers 33 are conducted over driven roll 54 and idler roll 55
through a heated tube 57 which, in general, is longer than the first heated tube 56
illustrated in Figure 5. The length of heated tube 57 compensates, in general, for
the higher velocity of fibers 33 in the third embodiment of Figure 7 compared to the
velocity of xerogel fibers (47) between takeup spool 52 and heated tube 56 in the
first embodiment of Figure 5. The first gel fibers 33 are now taken up by driven roll
61 and idler roll 62, operative to cause the stretch ratio in heated tube 57 to be
as desired, e.g. 10:1.
[0057] From rolls 61 and 62, the once-drawn first gel fibers 35 are conducted into modified
heated tube 64 and drawn by driven take up roll 65 and idler roll 66. Driven roll
65 is operated sufficiently fast to draw the fibers in heated tube 64 at the desired
stretch ratio, e.g. 2.5:1. Because of the relatively high line speed in heated tube
64, required generally to match the speed of once-drawn gel fibers 35 coming off of
rolls 61 and 62, heated tube 64 in the third embodiment of figure 7 will, in general,
be longer than heated tube 63 in either the second embodiment of Figure 6 or the first
embodiment of Figure 5. While first solvent may exude from the fiber during stretching
in heated tubes 57 and 64 (and be collected at the exit of each tube), the first solvent
is sufficiently non-volatile so as not to evaporate to an appreciable extent in either
of these heated tubes.
[0058] The twice-stretched first gel fiber 36 is then conducted through solvent extraction
device 37, where the second, volatile solvent extracts the first solvent out of the
fibers. The second gel fibers, containing substantially only second solvent, is then
dried in drying device 45, and the twice-stretched fibers 70 are then taken up on
spool 72.
[0059] It will be appreciated that, by comparing the third embodiment of Figure 7 to the
first two embodiments of Figures 5 and 6, the stretching step (F) is performed in
the third embodiment in two stages, both subsequent to cooling step C and prior to
solvent extracting step D.
[0060] The process of the invention will be further illustrated by the examples below. The
first example illustrates the prior art techniques of Smook et.al. and the Kalb and
Pennings articles.
Comparative Example 1
[0061] A glass vessel equipped with a PTFE paddle stirrer was charged with 5.0 wt% linear
polyethylene (sold as Hercules UHMW 1900, having 24 IV and approxi- imately 4 x 10
6 M.W.), 94.5 wt% paraffin oil (J.T. Baker, 345-355 Saybolt viscosity) and 0.5 wt%
antioxidant (sold under the trademark Ionol).
[0062] The vessel was sealed under nitrogen pressure and heated with stirring to 150°C.
The vessel and its contents were maintained under slow agitation for 48 hours. At
the end of this period the solution was cooled to room temperature. The cooled solution
separated into two phases - A "mushy" liquid phase consisting of 0.43 wt% polyethylene
and a rubbery gel phase consisting of 8.7 wt% polyethylene. The gel phase was collected,
cut into pieces and fed into a 2.5 cm (one inch) Sterling extruder equipped with a
21/1 L/D polyethylene-type screw. The extruder was operated at 10 RPM, 170°C and was
equipped with a conical single hole spinning die of 1 cm inlet diameter, 1 mm exit
diameter and 6 cm length.
[0063] The deformation and compression of the gel by the extruder screw caused exudation
of paraffin oil from the gel. This liquid backed up in the extruder barrel and was
mostly discharged from the hopper end of the extruder. At the exit end of the extruder
a gel fiber of approximately 0.7 mm diameter was collected at the rate of 1.6 m/min.
The gel fiber consisted of 24-38 wt
% polyethylene. The solids content of the gel fiber varied substantially with time.
[0064] The paraffin oil was extracted from the extruded gel fiber using hexane and the fiber
was dried under vacuum at 50°C. The dried gel fiber had a density of 0.326 g/cm
3. Therefore, based on a density of 0.960 for the polyethylene constituent, the gel
fiber consisted of 73.2 volume percent voids. Measurement of pore volume using a mercury
porosimeter showed a pore volume of 2.58 cm
3/g. A B.E.T. measurement of surface area gave a value of 28.8
m2/g.
[0065] The dried fiber was stretched in a nitrogen atmosphere within a hot tube of 1.5 meters
length. Fiber feed speed was 2 cm/min. Tube temperature was 100°C at the inlet increasing
to 150°C at the outlet.
[0066] It was found that, because of filament non-uniformity, stretch ratios exceeding 30/1
were not sustainable for periods exceeding 20 minutes without filament breakage.
[0067] The properties of the fiber prepared at 30/1 stretch ratio were as follows:
denier - 99
tenacity - 23 g/d
modulus - 980 g/d
elongation at break - 3%
work-to-break - 6570 in lbs./in3 (6.5 x 109 J/m3 or 6.5 GJ/m3)
[0068] The following example is illustrative of the present invention:
Example 2
[0069] An oil jacketed double helical (Helicone
8) mixer constructed by Atlantic Research Corporation was charged with 5.0 wt% linear
polyethylene (Hercules UHMW 1900 having a 17 IV and approximately 2.5 x 10
6 M.W.) and 94.5 wt% paraffin oil (J.T. Baker, 345-355 Saybolt viscosity). The charge
was heated with agitation at 20 rpm to 200°C under nitrogen pressure over a period
of two hours. After reaching 200°C, agitation was maintained for an additional two
hours.
[0070] The bottom discharge opening of the Helicone mixer was fitted with a single hole
capillary spinning die of 2 mm diameter and 9.5 mm length. The temperature of the
spinning die was maintained at 200°C.
[0071] Nitrogen pressure applied to the mixer and rotation of the blades of the mixer were
used to extrude the charge through the spinning die. The extruded uniform solution
filament was quenched to a gel state by passage through a water bath located at a
distance of 33 cm (13 inches) below the spinning die. The gel filament was wound up
continuously on a 15.2 cm (6 inch) diameter bobbin at the rate of 4.5 meters/min.
[0072] The bobbins of gel fiber were immersed in trichlorotrifloroethane (fluorocarbon 113
or "TCTFE") to exchange this solvent for paraffin oil as the liquid constituent of
the gel. The gel fiber was unwound from a bobbin, and the fluorocarbon solvent evaporated
at 22-50°C.
[0073] The dried fiber was of 970 + 100 denier. The density of the fiber was determined
to be 950 kg/m
3 by the density gradient method. Therefore, based on a density of 960 kg/m
3 for the polyethylene constituent, the dried fiber contained one volume percent voids.
A B.E.T. measurement of the surface area gave a value less than
1 m2/g
.
[0074] The dried gel fiber was fed at 2 cm/min into a hot tube blanketed with nitrogen and
maintained at 100
°C at its inlet and 140°C at its outlet. The fiber was stretched continously 45/1 within
the hot tube for a period of three hours without experiencing fiber breakage. The
properties of the stretched fiber were:
denier - 22.5
tenacity - 37.6 g/d
modulus - 1460 g/d
work-to-break-12,900 (12.9 x 109 J/m3 or 12.9 GJ/m3)
Examples 3-99
[0075] A series of fiber samples was prepared following the procedures described in Example
2, but with variations introduced in the following material and process parameters:
a. polyethylene IV (molecular weight)
b. polymer gel concentration
c. stretch temperature
d. fiber denier
e. stretch ratio
[0077] In order to determine the relationships of the fiber properties to the process and
material parameters, the data of Table I were subjected to statistical analysis by
multiple lnear regression. The regression equation obtained for fiber tenacity was
as follows:

Where SR is stretch ratio
IV is polymer intrinsic viscosity in decalin at 135°C, dl/g
C is polymer concentration in the gel, wt%
T is stretch temp. °C
[0078] The statistics of the regression were:
F ratio (6,95) = 118
significance level = 99.9+%
standard error of estimate = 3.0 g/d
[0079] A comparison between the observed tenacities and tenacities calculated from the regression
equation is shown in Figure 1.
[0080] Figures 2 and 3 present response surface contours for tenacity calculated from the
regression equation on two important planes.
[0081] In the experiments of Examples 3-99, a correl- tion of modulus with spinning parameters
was generally parallel to that of tenacity. A plot of fiber modulus versus tenacity
is shown in Figure 4.
[0082] It will be seen from the data, the regression equations and the plots of the calculated
and observed results that the method of the invention enables substantial control
to obtain desired fiber properties and that greater controlability and flexibility
is obtained than by prior art methods.
[0083] Further, it should be noted that many of the fibers of these examples showed higher
teancities and/or modulus values than had been obtained by prior art methods. In the
prior art methods of Off. 30 04 699 and GB 2051667, all fibers prepared had tenacities
less than 3.0 G
Pa (35 g/d) and moduli less than 100 GPa (1181 g/d). In the present instance, fiber
examples Nos. 21, 67, 70, 73, 82, 84 and 88 exceeded both of these levels and other
fiber examples surpassed on one or the other property.
[0084] In the prior art publications of Pennings and coworkers, all fibers (prepared discontinuously)
had moduli less than 121 G
Pa (1372 g/d). In the present instance continuous fiber examples No. 70, 71, 73, 82,
83, 84, 88 and 99 surpassed this level.
[0085] The fiber of example 71 was further tested for resistance to creep at 23°C under
a sustained load of 10% of the breaking load. Creep is defined as follows:

where B(s) is the length of the test section immediately after application of load
A(s,t) is the length of the test section at time t after application of load, s
A and B are both functions of the loads, while A is also a function of time t.
[0086] For comparison, a commercial nylon tire cord (6 denier, 9.6 g/d tenacity) and a polyethylene
fiber prepared in accordance with Serial No. 225,288, filed January 15, 1981 by surface
growth and subsequent hot stretching (10 denier, 41.5 g/d tenacity) were similarly
tested for creep.
[0087] The results of these tests are presented in Table II.

[0088] It will be seen that the fiber of example 71 showed 1.4% creep in 50 days at 23°C
under the sustained load equal to 10% of the breaking load. By way of comparison,
both the commercial nylon 6 tire cord and the surface grown polyethylene fiber showed
5% creep under similar test conditions.
[0089] The melting temperatures and the porosities of the fibers of examples 64, 70 and
71 were determined. Melting temperatures were measured using a DuPont 990 differential
scanning calorimeter. Samples were heated in an argon atmosphere at the rate of 10°C/min.
Additionally, the melting temperature was determined for the starting polyethylene
powder from which the fibers of examples 64, 70 and 71 were prepared.
[0090] Porosities of the fibers were determined by measurements of their densities using
the density gradient technique and comparison with the density of a compression molded
plaque prepared from the same initial polyethylene powder. (The density of the compression
molded plaque was 960 kg/m ).
[0091] Porosity was calculated as follows:

Results were as follows:

[0092] The particular level and combination of properties exhibited by the fiber of examples
64, 70 and 71, i.e., tenacity at least 30 g/d, modulus in excess of 1000 g/d, work-to-break
at least 7.5
GJ/m
3 and creep (at 23°C and 10% of breaking load) less than 3% in 50 days, melting temperature
of at least 147°C and porosity less than 10% appears not to have been attained heretofore.
[0093] The following examples illustrate the effect of the second solvent upon fiber properties.
Examples 100-108
[0094] Fiber samples were prepared as described in Example 2, but with the following variations.
The bottom discharge opening of the Helicone mixer was adapted to feed the polymer
solution first to a gear pump and thence to a single hole conical spinning die. The
cross-section of the spinning die tapered uniformly at a 7.5° angle from an entrance
diameter of 10 mm to an exit diameter of 1 mm. The gear pump speed was set to deliver
5.84 cm
3/min of polymer solution to the die. The extruded solution filament was quenched to
a gel state by passage through a water bath located at a distance of 20 cm below the
spinning die. The gel filament was wound up continuously on bobbins at the rate of
7.3 meters/min.
[0095] The bobbins of gel fiber were immersed in several different solvents at room temperature
to exchange with the paraffin oil as the liquid constituent of the gel. The solvents
and their boiling points were:

[0096] The solvent exchanged gel fibers were air dried at room temperature. Drying of the
gel fibers was accompanied in each case by substantial shrinkage of transverse dimensions.
Surprisingly, it was observed that the shape and surface texture of the xerogel fibers
departed progressively from a smooth cylindrical form in approximate proportion to
the boiling point of the second solvent. Thus, the fiber from which diethyl ether
had been dried was substantially cylindrical whereas the fiber from which toluene
had been dried was "C" shaped in cross-section.
[0097] The xerogel fibers prepared using TCTFE and n-hexane as second solvents were further
compared by stretching each at 130°C, incrementally increasing stretch ratio until
fiber breakage occurred. The tensile properties of the resulting fibers were determined
as shown in Table III.
[0098] It will be seen that the xerogel fiber prepared using TCTFE as the second solvent
could be stretched continuously to a stretch ratio of 49/1, whereas the xerogel fiber
prepared using n-hexane could be stretched continuously only to a stretch ratio of
33/1. At maximum stretch ratio, the stretched fiber prepared using TCTFE second solvent
was of 39.8 g/d tenacity, 1580 g/d modulus and of 9.6 G
J/m
3 work-to-break. This compares to 32.0 g/d tenacity, 1140 g/d modulus and 8.4 GJ/m
3 obtained using n-hexane as the second solvent.

Example 110
[0099] Following the procedures of Examples 3-99, an 8 wt% solution of isotactic polypropylene
of 12.8 intrinsic viscosity (in decalin at 135°C), approximately 2.1 x 10
6M.W. was prepared in paraffin oil at 200°C. A gel fiber was spun at 6.1 meters/min.
The paraffin oil was solvent exchanged with TCTFE and the gel fiber dried at room
temperature. The dried fiber was stretched 25/1 at a feed roll speed of 2 cm/min.
Stretching was conducted in a continuous manner for one hour at 160°C.
[0100] Fiber properties were as follows:
denier - 105
tenacity - 9.6 g/d
modulus - 164 g/d
elongation - 11.5%
work-to-break - 9280 in lbs/in3 (9.2 x 109 J/m3 or 9.2 GJ/m3
Examples 111-486
[0101] A series of xerogel fiber samples was prepared as in Example 2 but using a gear pump
to control melt flow rate. Variations were introduced in the following material and
process parameters:
a. polyethylene IV (molecular weight)
b. polymer gel concentration
c. die exit diameter
d. die included angle (conical orifice)
e. spinning temperature
f. melt flow rate
g. distance to quench
h. gel fiber take-up velocity
i. xerogel fiber denier
[0102] Each of the xerogel fiber samples prepared was stretched in a hot tube of 1.5 meter
length blanketed with nitrogen and maintained at 100°C at the fiber inlet and 140°C
at the fiber outlet. Fiber feed speed into the hot tube was 4 cm/min. (Under these
conditions the actual fiber temperature was within 1°C of the tube temperature at
distances beyond 15 cm from the inlet). Each sample was stretched continuously at
a series of increasing stretch ratios. The independent variables for these experiments
are summarized below:
Polymer Intrinsic Viscosity (dL/g)
[0103]
11.5 - Examples 172-189, 237-241, 251-300, 339-371
15.5 - Examples 111-126, 138-140, 167-171, 204-236, 242-243, 372-449, 457-459
17.7 - Examples 127-137, 141-166, 190-203, 244-250, 301-338
20.9 - Examples 450-456, 467-486
Gel Concentration
[0104]
5% - Examples 127-137, 141-149, 167-171, 190-203, 244-260, 274-276, 291-306, 339-371
6% - Examples 111-126, 138-140, 204-236, 242-243, 372-418, 431-486
7% - Examples 150-166, 172-189, 237-241, 261-273, 277-290, 307-338
Die Diameter
[0105]

Die Angle (Degrees)
[0106]
0° - Examples 127-137, 141-149, 261-281, 307-316, 339-365, 419-430
7.5° - Examples 111-126, 138-140, 167-171, 204-243, 251-260, 301-306, 317-338, 372-418,
431-486
15° - Examples 150-166, 172-203, 244-250, 282-300, 366-371
Spinning Temperature
[0107]
180"C - Examples 172-203, 237-241, 301-322, 339-371
200°C - Examples 111-126, 138-140, 167-171, 204-236, 242-243, 372-486
220°C - Examples 127-137, 141-166, 244-300, 232-338
Solution Flow Rate (cm3/min)
[0108]
2.92 + 0.02 - Examples 116-122, 135-145, 150-152, 162-166, 172-173, 196-201, 214-222,
237, 240, 242-245, 251-255, 260-265, 277-284, 288-293, 301, 304-306, 310-312, 318-320,
347-360, 368-370, 372, 395-397, 401-407, 412-414, 419-424, 450-459, 467-481
4.37 + 0.02 - Examples 204-208, 230-236, 377-379, 408-411
Solution Flow Rate (cm3/min) (continued)
[0109]
5.85 + 0.05 - Examples 111-115, 123-134, 146-149, 153-161, 167-171, 180-195, 202-203,
209-213, 223-229, 238-239, 241, 256-259, 266-276, 285-287, 294-300, 302-303, 307-309,
315-317, 321-326, 335-338 361-367, 371, 373-376, 392-394, 398-400, 415-418, 431-433,
482-486
6.07 - Examples 339-346
8.76 - Examples 380-391
8.88 - Examples 246-250
11.71 + 0.03 - Examples 434-437, 445-449
17.29 - Examples 438-440
Distance To Quench
[0110]

[0111] Under all of the varied conditions, the take- up velocity varied from 90-1621 cm/min,
the xerogel fiber denier from 98-1613, the stretch ratio from 5-174, the tenacity
from 9-45 g/denier, the tensile modulus from 21R-1700 g/denier, the elongation from
2.5-29.4% and the Work-to-break from 1-27 G
J/m
3.
[0113] In order to determine the relationships of the fiber properties to the process and
material parameters, all of the data from Example 111-486, including those Examples
listed in Table IV, were subjected to statistical analysis by multiple linear regression.
The regression equation obtained for fiber tenacity was as follows: Tenacity, g/d
=11.88 + 2.221IV' + 1.147C' + 1.948TM' +0.822Q' -1.167L' -2.438DO' +0.532SR
-0.726IV'DA' +1.399IV'TM' +0.534 IV'L'
+0.046IV'SR -0.754C'DA' -0.391C'Q' -0.419C'DO'
-1.327D'TM' +0.366D'L' -0.577DA'TM'
-0.790 DA'Q' -0.034 DA'SR -0.049 TM'SR
+0.809 Q'L' -0.313 Q'DO' - 0.334 (IV')2
+0.115 (L')2 +0.564 (DO')2 -0.00237 (SR)2 where:
IV' = (polymer IV, dL/g-14.4)/3.1
C' = Gel concentration, % - 6
TM' = (spinning temp.°C - 200)/20
Q' = (spin flow rate, cc/min - 4.38)/1.46
L' = (distance to quench, in - 15)/9
DO' = 1.4427 log (xerogel fiber denier/500)
SR = stretch ratio (xerogel fiber denier/stretched fiber denier)
DA' = (die angle,° - 7.5)/7.5
D' = (die exit diameter, inches - 0.06)/0.02 The statistics of the reggression were;
[0114] F ratio (26, 346) = 69
[0115] Significance Level =
99.9 +%
[0116] Standard error of estimate = 2.6 g/denier
[0117] In the vicinity of the center of the experimental space these effects may be summarized
by considering the magnitude of change in the factor which is required to increase
tenacity of 1 g/d. This is given below.

[0118] High fiber tenacity was favored by increasing polymer IV, increasing gel concentration,
increasing spinning temperature, decreasing die diameter, decreasing distance to quench,
decreasing xerogel fiber diameter, increasing stretch ratio and 0° die angle (straight
capillary).
[0119] It will be seen that the method of the invention enables substantial control to obtain
desired fiber properties and that greater controlability and flexabil- ity is obtained
than by prior art methods.
[0120] In these experiements, the effects of process parameters upon fiber modulus generally
paralled the effects of these variables upon tenacity. Fiber modulus was correlated
with tenacity as follows
modulus, g/d = 42(tenacity, g/d) -258
[0121] Significance of the correlation between modulus and tenacity was 99.99 +%. Standard
error of the estimate of modulus was 107 g/d.
[0122] It should be noted that many of the fibers of these examples show higher tenacities
and/or higher modulus than had seen obtained by prior art methods.
[0123] The densities and porosities of several of the xerogel and stretched fibers were
determined.

[0124] The porosities of these samples were substantially lower than in the prior art methods
cited earlier.
EXAMPLES 487-583
[0125] In the following examples of multi-filament spinning and stretching, polymer solutions
were prepared as in Example 2. The solutions were spun through a 16 hole spinning
die using a gear pump to control solution flow rate. The aperatures of the spinning
die were straight capillaries of length-to-diameter ratio of 25/1. Each capillary
was preceded by a conical entry region of 60° included angle.
[0126] The multi-filament solution yarns were quenched to a gel state by passing through
a water bath located at a short distance below the spinning die. The gel yarns were
wound up on perforated dye tubes.
EXAMPLES 487-495
ONE STAGE "DRY STRETCHING" OF MULTI-FILAMENT YARN
[0127] The wound tubes of gel yarn were extracted with TCTFE in a large Sohxlet apparatus
to exchange this solvent for paraffin oil as the liquid constituent of the gel. The
gel fiber was unwound from the tubes and the TCTFE solvent was evaporated at room
temperature.
[0128] The dried xerogel yarns were stretched by passing the yarn over a slow speed feed
godet and idler roll through a hot tube blanketed with nitrogen, onto a second godet
and idler roll driven at a higher speed. The stretched yarn was collected on a winder.
[0129] It was noted that some stretching of the yarn (approximately 2/1) occurred as it
departed the feed godet and before it entered the hot tube. The overall stretch ratio,
i.e., the ratio of the surface speeds of the godets, is given below.
[0130] In examples 487-495, the diameter of each hole of the 16 filament spinning die was
0.040 inch (one millimeter) the spinning temperature was 220°C, the stretch temperature
(in the hot tube) was 140°C and the feed roll speed during stretching was 4 cm/min.
In examples 487-490 the polymer IV was 17.5 and the gel concentration was 7 weight
%. In examples 491-495 the polymer IV was 22.6. The gel concentration was 9 weight
% in example 491, 8 weight % in examples 492-493 and 6 weight % in examples 494 and
495. The distance from the die face to the quench bath was 3 inches (7.52 cm) in examples
487, 488, 494 and 495 and 6 inches (15.2 cm) in examples 490-493. The other spinning
conditions and the properties of the final yarns were as follows:

EXAMPLES 496-501
ONE STAGE "WET STRETCHING" OF MULTI-FILAMENT YARN
[0131] The wound gel yarns still containing the paraffin oil were stretched by passing the
yarn over a slow speed feed godet and idler roll through a hot tube blanketed with
nitrogen onto a second godet and idler roll driven at high speed. It was noted that
some stretching of the yarn (approximately 2/1) occurred as it departed the feed godet
and before it entered the hot tube. The overall stretch ratio, i.e., the ratio of
the surface speeds of the godets is given below. The stretching caused essentially
no evaporation of the paraffin oil (the vapor pressure of the paraffin oil is 0.001
atmospheres at 149°C). However, half of the paraffin oil content of the gel yarns
was exuded during stretching. The stretched gel yarns were extracted with TCTFE in
a Sohxlet apparatus, then unwound and dried at room temperature.
[0132] In each of the examples 496-501 the spinning temperatures was 220°C, the gel concentration
was 6 weight % the distance from the spinning die to the water quench was 3 inches
(7.6 cm).
[0133] In examples 496 and 499-501 the diameter of each hole of the spinning die was 0.040
inches (0.1 cm). In examples 497 and 498 the hole diameters were 0.030 inches (0.075
cm). In examples 496 and 494-501 the polymer IV was 17.5. In examples 497 and 498
the polymer IV was 22.6. The other spinning conditions and properties of the final
yarns were as follows:

EXAMPLES 502-533
[0134] In the following examples a comparison is made between alternative two stage modes
of stretching the same initial batch of yarn. All stretching was done in a hot tube
blanketed with nitrogen.
Example 502
GEL YARN PREPARATION
[0135] The gel yarn was prepared from a 6 weight % solution of 22.6 IV polyethylene as in
example 2. The yarn was spun using a 16 hole x 0.030 inch (0.075 cm) die. Spinning
temperature was 220°C. Spin rate was 1 cm
3/min-fil. Distance from the die face to the quench bath was 3 inches (7.6 cm). Take-up
speed was 308 cm/ min. Nine rolls of 16 filament gel yarn was prepared.
Examples 503-576
"WET-WET" STRETCHING
[0136] In this mode the gel yarn containing the paraffin oil was stretched twice. In the
first stage, three of the rolls of 16 filament gel yarns described in example 502
above were combined and stretched together to prepare a 48 filament stretched gel
yarn. The first stage stretching conditions were: Stretch temperature 120°C, feed
speed 35 cm/min, stretch ratio 12/1. A small sample of the first stage stretched gel
yarn was at this point extracted with TCTFE, dried and tested for tensile properties.
The results are given below as example 503.
[0137] The remainder of the first stage stretched gel yarn was restretched at 1 m/min feed
speed. Other second stage stretching conditions and physical properties of the stretched
yarns are given below.

[0138] The density of the fiber of example 515 was determined to be 980 kg/m
3. The density of the fiber was therefore higher than the density of a compression
molded plaque and the porosity was essentially zero.
EXAMPLES 517-522
"WET-DRY" STRETCHING
[0139] In this mode the gel yarn was stretched once then extracted with TCTFE, dried and
stretched again.
[0140] In the first stage, three of the rolls of 16 filament gel yarn described in Example
502 were combined and stretched together to prepare a 48 filament stretched gel yarn.
The first stage stretching conditions were: stretch temperature 120°C, feed speed
35 cm/min, stretch ratio 12/1.
[0141] The first stage stretched gel yarn was extracted with TCTFE in a Sohxlet apparatus,
rewound and air dried at room temperature, then subjected to a second stage of stretching
in the dry state at a feed speed of 1 m/min. Other second stage stretching conditions
and physical properties of the stretched yarn are given below.

EXAMPLES 523-533
"DRY-DRY" STRETCHING
[0142] In this mode the gel yarn described in example 502 was extracted with TCTFE, dried,
then stretched in two stages. In the first stage, three of the rolls of 16 filament
yarn were combined and stretched together to prepare a 48 filament stretched xerogel
yarn. The first stage stretching conditions were: stretch temperature 120°C, feed
speed 35 cm/min., stretch ratio 10/1. The properties of the first stage stretched
xerogel yarn are given as example 523 below. In the second stretch stage the feed
speed was 1 m/min. Other second stage stretching conditions and physical properties
of the stretched yarns are given below.

[0143] The density of the fiber of example 529 was determined to be 940 Kg/m
3. The porosity of the fiber was therefore 2%.
EXAMPLES 534-542
MULTI-STAGE STRETCHING OF MULTI-FILAMENT YARN
[0144] In the following examples a comparison is made between two elevated temperature stretches
and a three stage stretch with the first stage at room temperature. The same initial
batch of polymer solution was used in these examples.
EXAMPLE 534
UNSTRETCHED GEL YARN PREPARATION
[0145] A 6 weight
% solution of 22.6 IV polyethylene yarn was prepared as in example 2. A 16 filament
yarn was spun and wound as in example 502.
EXAMPLE 535
PREPARATION OF GEL YARN STRETCHED AT ROOM TEMPERATURE
[0146] The unstretched gel yarn prepared as in example 534 was led continuously from a first
godet which set the spinning take-up speed to a second godet operating at a surface
speed of 616 cm/min. In examples 540-542 only, the as-spun gel fiber was stretched
2/1 at room temperature in-line with spinning. The once stretched gel fiber was wound
on tubes.
EXAMPLES 536-542
[0147] The 16 filament gel yarns prepared in examples 534 and 535 were stretched twice at
elevated temperature. In the first of such operations the gel yarns were fed at 35
cm/min to a hot tube blanketed with nitrogen and maintained at 120°C. In the second
stage of elevated temperature stretching the gel yarns were fed at 1 m/min and were
stretched at 150°C. Other stretching conditions and yarn properties are given below.

EXAMPLES 543-551
POLYETHYLENE YARNS OF EXTREME MODULUS
[0148] The highest experimental value reported for the modulus of a polyethylene fiber appears
to be by P. J. Barham and A. Keller, J. Poly. Sci., Polymer Letters ed. 17, 591 (1979).
The measurement 140 GPa (1587 g/d) was made by a dynamic method at 2.5 Hz and 0.06%
strain and is expected to be higher than would be a similar measurement made by A.S.T.M.
Method D2101 "Tensile Properties of Single Man Made Fibers Taken from Yarns and Tows"
or by A.S.T.M. Method D2256 "Breaking Load (Strength) and Elongation of Yarn by the
Single Strand Method." The latter methods were used in obtaining the data reported
here.
[0149] The following examples illustrate the preparation of novel polyethylene yarns of
modulus exceeding 1600 g/d and in some cases of modulus exceeding 2000 g/d. Such polyethylene
fibers and yarns were heretofore unknown. In the following examples all yarns were
made from a 22.6 IV polyethylene, 6 weight % solution prepared as in example 2 and
spun as in example 502. All yarns were stretched in two stages. The first stage stretch
was at a temperature of 120°C. The second stage stretch was at a temperature of 150°C.
Several 16 filament yarn ends may have been combined during stretching. Stretching
conditions and yarn properties are given below.

[0150] The yarns of examples 548 and 550 were characterized by DTA and density measurement.
The results, displayed below, indicate two distinct peaks at the melting points indicated,
quite unlike the broad single peak at 145.5°C or less reported by Smith and Lemstra
in J. Mat. Sci., vol 15, 505 (1980).

EXAMPLES 552-558
POLYPROPYLENE YARNS OF EXTREME MODULUS
[0151] The highest reported experimental value for the modulus of a polypropylene material
(fiber or other form) appears to be by T. Williams, T. Mat. Sci., 6, 537 (1971). Their
value on a solid state extruded billet was 16.7 G
Pa (210 g/d). The following examples illustrate the preparation of polypropylene continuous
fibers with modulus exceeding 220 g/d and in some cases of modulus exceeding 250 g/d.
[0152] In the following examples all fibers were made from an 18 IV polypropylene, 6 weight
% solution in paraffin oil prepared as in example 2. In Examples 552-556, the fibers
were spun with a single hole conical die of 0.040" (0.1 cm) exit diameter and
7.5
% angle. Solution temperature was 220°C. A melt pump was used to control solution flow
rate at 2.92 cm
3/min. Distance from the die face to the water quench was 3 inches (7.
6 cm). The gel fibers were one stage wet stretched at 25 cm/min feed roll speed into
a 1.5 m hot tube blanketed with nitrogen. The stretched fibers were extracted in TCTFE
and air dried. Other spinning and stretching conditions as well as fiber properties
are given below.

[0153] The fiber of example 556 was determined by DTA to have a first melting temperature
of 170-171°C with higher order melting temperatures of 173°C, 179°C and 185°C. This
compares with the 166°C melting point of the initial polymer. The moduli of these
fibers substantially exceed the highest previously reported values.
[0154] In Examples 557 and 558, the yarns were spun with a 16 hole x 0.040 inch (1 mm) capillary
die. The solution temperature was 223°C, and the spinning rate was 2.5 cm
3/min-filament. The distance from the die face to the water quench bath was 3 inches
(7.6 cm). Take-up speed was 430 cm/min. The gel yarns were "wet-wet" stretched in
two stages. The first stage stretching was at 140°C at a feed speed of 35 cm/min.
The second stage stretching was at a temperature of 169°C, a feed speed of 100 cm/min
and a stretch ratio of 1.25/1. Other stretching conditions as well as fiber properties
are given below.

The moduli of these yarns very substantially exceed the highest previously reported
values.