Description
Technical Field
[0001] This invention relates to processes for converting heavy hydrocarbon oils into lighter
fractions, and especially to processes for converting heavy hydrocarbons containing
high concentrations of coke precursors and heavy metals into gasoline and other hydrocarbon
fuels.
Background Art
[0002] The introduction of catalytic cracking to the petroleum industry in the 1930's constituted
a major advance over previous techniques with the object of increasing the yield of
gaseoline and its quality. Early fixed bed, moving bed, and fluid bed catalytic cracking
FCC processes employed vacuum gas oils (VGO) from crude sources that were considered
sweet and light. The terminology of sweet refers to low sulfur content and light refers
to the amount of material boiling below approximately 1000-1025°F.
[0003] The catalysts employed in early homogenous fluid dense beds were of an amorphous
siliceous material, prepared synthetically or from naturally occurring materials activated
by acid leaching. Tremendous strides were made in the 1950's in FCC technology in
the areas of metallurgy, processing equipment, regeneration and new more-active and
more stable amorphous catalysts. However, increasing demand with respect to quantity
of gasoline and increased octane number requirements to satisfy the new high horsepower-high
compression engines being promoted by the auto industry, put extreme pressure on the
petroleum industry to increase FCC capacity and severity of operation.
[0004] A major breakthrough in FCC catalysts came in the early 1960's with the introduction
of molecular sieves or zeolites. These materials were incorporated into the matrix
of amorphous and/or amorphous/kaolin materials constituting the FCC catalysts of that
time. These new zeolitic catalysts, containing a crystalline aluminosilicate zeolite
in an amorphous or amorphous/kaolin matrix of silica, alumina, silica-alumina, kaolin,
clay or the like were at least 1
000-10,000 times more active for cracking hydrocarbons than the earlier amorphous or
amorphous/kaolin containing silica-alumina catalysts. This introduction of zeolitic
cracking catalysts revolutionized the fluid catalytic cracking process. Innovations
were developed to handle these high activities, such as riser cracking, shortened
contact times, new regeneration processes, new improved zeolitic catalyst developments,
and the like.
[0005] The new catalyst developments revolved around the development of various zeolites
such as synthetic types X and Y and naturally occurring faujasites; increased thermal-
steam (hydrothermal) stability of zeolites through the inclusion of rare earth ions
or ammonium ions via ion-exchange techniques; and the development of more attrition
resistant matrices for supporting the zeolites. These zeolitic catalyst developments
gave the petroleum industry the capability of greatly increasing throughput of feedstock
with increased conversion and selectivity while employing the same units without expansion
and without requiring new unit construction.
[0006] After the introduction of zeolite-containing catalysts the petroleum industry began
to suffer from a lack of crude availability as to quantity and quality accompanied
by increasing demand for gasoline with increasing octane values. The world crude supply
picture changed dramatically in the late 1960's and early 1970's. From a surplus of
light, sweet crudes the supply situation changed to a tighter supply with an ever-increasing
amount of heavier crudes with higher sulfur contents. These heavier and higher sulfur
crudes presented processing problems to the petroleum refiner in that these heavier
crudes invariably also contained much higher metals and Conradson carbon values, with
accompanying significantly increased asphaltic content.
[0007] Fractionation of the total crude to yield cat-cracker charge stocks also required
much better control to ensure that metals and Conradson carbon values were not carried
overhead to contaminate the FCC charge stock.
[0008] The effects of heavy metals and Conradson carbon on a zeolite-containing FCC catalyst
have been described in the literature as to their highly unfavorable effect in lowering
catalyst activity and selectivity for gasoline production and their harmful effect
on catalyst life.
[0009] These heavier crude oils also contained more of the heavier fractions and yielded
a lower volume of the high quality FCC charge stocks which normally boil below about
1025°F and are usually processed so as to contain total metal levels below 1 ppm,
preferably below 0.1 ppm, and Conradson carbon values substantially below 1.0..
[0010] With the increasing supply of heavier crudes, which yield less gasoline, and the
increasing demand for liquid transportation fuels, the petroleum industry began a
search for processes to utilize these heavier crudes in producing gasoline. Many of
these processes have been described in the literature and include Gulf's Gulfining
and Union Oil's Unifining processes for treating residuum, UOP's Aurabon process,
Hydrocarbon Research's H-Oil process, Exxon's Flexi- coking process to produce thermal
gasoline and coke, H-Oil's Dynacracking and Phillip's Heavy Oil Cracking (HOC) processes.
These processes utilize thermal cracking or hydrotreating followed by FCC or hydrocracking
operations to handle the higher content of metal contaminants (Ni-V-Fe-Cu-Na) and
high Conradson carbon values of 5-15. Some of the drawbacks of these types of processing
are as follows: coking yields thermally cracked gasoline which has a much lower octane
value than cat cracked gasoline, and is unstable due to the production of gum from
diolefins, and requires further hydrotreating and reforming to produce a high octane
product: gas oil quality is degraded due to thermal reactions which produce a product
containing refractory polynuclear aromatics and high Conradson carbon levels which
are highly unsuitable for catalytic cracking: and hydrotreating requires expensive
high pressure hydrogen, multi-reactor systems made of special alloys, costly operations,
and a separate costly facility for the production of-hydrogen.
[0011] To better understand the reasons why the industry has progressed along the processing
schemes described, one must understand the known effects of contaminant metals (Ni-V-Fe
Cu-Na) and Conradson carbon on the zeolite-containing cracking catalysts and the operating
parameters of an FCC unit. Metal content and Conradson carbon are two very effective
restraints on the operation of an FCC unit and may even impose undesirable restraints
on a Reduced Crude Conversion (RCC) unit from the standpoint of obtaining maximum
conversion, selectivity and catalyst life. Relatively low levels of these contaminants
' are highly detrimental to an FCC unit. As metals and Conradson carbon levels are increased
still further, the operating capacity and efficiency of an RCC unit may be adversely
affected or made uneconomical. These adverse effects occur even through there is enough
hydrogen in the feed to produce an ideal gasoline consisting of only toluene and isomeric
pentenes (assuming a catalyst with such ideal selectivity could be devised).
[0012] The effect of increased Conradson carbon is to increase that portion of the feedstock
converted to coke deposited on the catalyst. In typical VGO operations employing a
zeolite-containing catalyst in an FCC unit, the amount of coke deposited on the catalyst
averages around about 4-5 wt% of the feed. This coke production has been atrributed
to four different coking mechanisms, namely, contaminant coke from adverse reactions
caused by metal deposits, catalytic coke caused by acid site cracking, entrained hydrocarbons
resulting from pore structure adsorption and/or poor stripping, and Conradson carbon
resulting from pyrolytic distillation of hydrocarbons in the conversion zone. There
has been postulated two other sources of coke present in reduced crudes in addition
to the four present in VGO. They are: (1) adsorbed and absorbed high boiling hydrocarbons
which do not vaporize and cannot be removed by normally efficient stripping, and (2)
high molecular weight nitrogen-containing hydrocarbon compounds adsorbed on the catalyst's
acid sites. Both of these two new types of coke producing phenomena add greatly to
the complexity of resid processing. Therefore, in the processing of higher boiling
fractions, e.g., reduced crudes, residual fractions, topped crude, and the like, the
coke production based on feed is the summation of the four types present in VGO processing
(the Conradson carbon value generally being much higher than for VGO), plus coke from
the higher boiling unstrippable hydrocarbons and coke associated with the high boiling
nitrogen-containing molecules which are adsorbed on the catalyst. Coke production
on clean catalyst, when processing reduced crudes, may be estimated as approximately
4 wt% of the feed plus the Conradson carbon value of the heavy feedstock.
[0013] The coked catalyst is brought back to equilibrium activity by burning off the deactivating
coke in a regeneration zone in the presence of air, and the regenerated catalyst is
recycled back to the reaction zone. The heat
gen- erated during regeneration is removed by the catalyst and carried to the reaction
zone for vaporization of the feed and to provide heat for the endothermic cracking
reaction. The temperature in the regenerator is normally limited because of metallurgical
limitations and the hydrothermal stability of the catalyst.
[0014] The hydrothermal stability of the zeolite-containing catalyst is determined by the
temperature and steam partial pressure at which the zeolite begins to rapidly lose
its crystalline structure to yield a low-activity amorphous material. The presence
of steam is highly critical and is generated by the burning of adsorbed and absorbed
(sorbed) carbonaceous material which has a significant hydrogen content (hydrogen
to carbon atomic ratios generally greater than about 0.5). This carbonaceous material
is principally the high-boiling sorbed hydrocarbons with boiling points as high as
1500-1700°F or above that have a modest hydrogen content and the high boiling nitrogen
containing hydrocarbons, as well as related porphyrins and asphaltenes. The high molecular
weight nitrogen compounds usually boil above 1025°F and may be either basic or acidic
in nature. The basic nitrogen compounds may neutralize acid sites while those that
are more acidic may be attracted to metal sites on the catalyst. The porphyrins and
asphaltenes also generally boil above 1025°F and may contain elements other than carbon
and hydrogen. As used in this specification, the term "heavy hydrocarbons" includes
all carbon and hydrogen compounds that do not boil below about 1025°F, regardless
of the presence of other elements in the compound.
[0015] The heavy metals in the feed are generally present as porphyrins and/or asphaltenes.
However, certain of these metals, particularly iron and copper, may be present as
the free metal or as inorganic compounds resulting from either corrosion of process
equipment or contaminants from other refining processes.
[0016] As the Conradson carbon value of the feedstock increases, coke production increases
and this increased load will raise the regeneration temperature; thus the unit may
be limited as to the amount of feed that can be processed because of its Conradson
carbon content. Earlier VGO units operated with the regenerator at 1150-1250°F. A
new development in reduced crude processing, namely, Ashland Oil's "Reduced Crude
Conversion Process", as described in pending U.S. applications Ser. Nos. 94,091, 94,092,
94,216, 94,217 and 94,227, all filed on November 14, 1979, can operate at regenerator
temperatures in the range of 1350-1400°F. But even these higher regenerator temperatures
place a limit on the Conradson carbon vlue of the feed at approximately 8, which represents
about 12-13 wt% coke on the catalyst based on the weight of feed. This level is controlling
unless considerable water is introduced to further control temperature, which addition
is also practiced in Ashland's RCC processes.
[0017] The metal-containing fractions of reduced crudes contain Ni-V-Fe-Cu in the form of
porphyrins and asphaltenes. These metal-containing hydrocarbons are deposited on the
catalyst during processing and are cracked in the riser to deposit the metal or are
carried over by the coked catalyst as the metallo-porphyrin or asphaltene and converted
to the metal oxide during regeneration. The adverse effects of these metals as taught
in the literature are to cause non- selective or degradative cracking and dehydrogenation
to produce increased amounts of coke and light gases such as hydrogen, methane and
ethane. These mechanisms adversely affect selectivity, resulting in poor yields and
quality of gasoline and light cycle oil. The increased production of light gases,
while impairing the yield and selectivity of the process, also puts an increased demand
on gas compressor capacity. The increase in coke production, in addition to its negative
impact on yield, also adversely affects catalyst activity-selectivity, greatly increases
regenerator air demand and compressor capacity, and may result in uncontrollable and/or
dangerous regenerator temperatures.
[0018] These problems of the prior art have been greatly minimized by the development at
Ashland Oil, Inc., of its Reduced Crude Conversion (RCC) Processes described in the
copending applications reference above and incorporated herein by reference. The new
processes can handle reduced crudes or crude oils containing high metals and Conradson
carbon values previously not susceptible to direct processing.
[0019] It has long been known that reduced crudes with high nickel levels present serious
problems as to catalyst deactivation at high metal on catalyst contents, e.
g., 5000-10,000 ppm and elevated regenerator temperatures. It has now been recognized
that when reduced crudes with high vanadium levels are processed over zeolite containing
catalysts, especially at high vanadium levels on the catalyst, rapid deactivation
of the zeolite can occur. This deactivation manifests itself as a loss of zeolitic
structure. This loss has been observed at vanadium levels of 1000 ppm by weight or
less. This loss of zeolitic structure becomes more rapid and severe with increasing
levels of vanadium and at vanadium levels about 5000 ppm, particularly at levels approaching
10,000 ppm complete destruction of the zeolite may occur. Prior to the present invention,
it was believed impossible to operate economically at vanadium levels higher than
10,000 ppm because of this phenomenon. Previously, deactivation of catalyst by vanadium
at vanadium levels of less than 10,000 ppm has been retarded by lowering regenerator
temperatures and increasing the addition rate of virgin catalyst. Lowering regenerator
temperatures has the disadvantage of requiring higher catalyst to oil ratios which
increase the amount of coke produced and adversely affect yields. Increasing catalyst
addition rates is costly and can result in an uneconomical operation.
[0020] It has been found that vanadium is especially detrimental to catalyst life. The vanadium
deposited on the catalyst under the reducing conditions in the riser is in an oxidation
state less than +5. At the elevated temperatures and oxidizing conditions encountered
in the regenerator the vanadium on the catalyst is converted to vanadium oxides, in
particular vanadium pentoxide. The vanadium pentoxide has a melting point lower than
temperatures encountered in the regeneration zone, and it can become a mobile liquid,
flowing across the catalyst surface and plugging pores. This vanadia may also enter
the zeolite structure, neutralizing the acid sites and, more significantly, irreversibly
destroying the crystalline aluminosilicate structure and forming a less active amorphous
material. In addition, this molten vanadia can, at high vanadia levels, especially
for catalyst materials having a low surface area, coat the catalyst microspheres and
thereby coalesce particles which adversely affects their fluidization.
Summarv of the Invention
[0021] In accordance with this invention a process has been provided for converting a vanadium-containing
hydrocarbon oil feed to lighter products comprising the steps of contacting said oil
feed under conversion conditions with a cracking catalyst to form lighter products
and coke, whereby vanadium in an oxidation state less than +5 is deposited on said
catalyst together with coke. The lighter products are separated from the spent catalyst
and the catalyst is regenerated by contacting it with an oxygen-containing gas under
conditions whereby said coke is burned forming CO and C0
2 and said vanadium is maintained in an oxidation state less than +5.
[0022] This invention, by retaining vanadium in an oxidation state wherein the vanadium
has a high melting point, permits the recycle of catalyst to levels of vanadium as
high as 10,000 ppm, or even 20,000 ppm or 50,000 ppm. The adverse effects, such as
clumping of the catalyst and pore closings brought about by molten pentavalent vanadium,
are thus avoided. Inasmuch as the catalyst can withstand a much higher vanadium loading
than previously experienced the amount of make-up catalyst is reduced.
Brief Description of the Drawinas
[0023] Figs. 1 and 2 are schematic designs of catalyst regeneration and associated cracking
apparatus which may be used in carrying out this invention.
Best and Various Other Modes For Carrying Out the Invention
[0024] The invention may be carried out by controlling the regeneration of the spent, vanadium-containing
catalyst using several methods, alone or in combination. The objective of these methods
is to retain vanadium in a low oxidation state, either by not exposing the vanadium
to oxidizing conditions, or by exposing vanadium to oxidizing conditions for too short
a time to oxidize a significant amount of vanadium to the +5 state.
[0025] The concentration of vanadium on the catalyst particles increases as the catalyst
is recycled, and the vanadium on the catalyst introduced into the reactor becomes
coated with coke formed in the reactor. In one method-of carrying out the invention,
the generator conditions are selected to ensure that the concentration of coke is
retained at at least a minimum level on the catalyst. This coke may serve either to
ensure a reducing environment for the vanadium or to provide a barrier to the movement
of oxidizing gas to underlying vanadium. The concentration of coke on the catalyst
particles is at least about 0.05 percent and the preferred coke concentration is at
least about 0.15 percent.
[0026] In one method of carrying out this invention, which may be combined with the foregoing
method of retaining at least about 0.05 percent coke on the catalyst or may be used
to achieve lower concentrations of coke, the regeneration is carried out in an environment
which is non-oxidizing for the vanadium in an oxidation state less than +5. This may
be accomplished by adding reducing gases such as, for example, CO or ammonia to the
regenerator, or by regenerating under oxygen-deficient conditions. Oxygen-deficient
regeneration increases the ratio of CO to C0
2 and in this method of providing a non-oxidizing atmosphere the CO/C0
2 ratio is at least about 0.25, preferably is at least about 0.3, and most preferably
is at least about 0.4. The CO/CO
2 ratio may be controlled by controlling the extent of oxygen deficiency within the
regenerator.
[0027] The CO/C0
2 ratio may be increased by providing chlorine in an oxidizing atmosphere within the
regenerator, the concentration of chlorine preferably being from about 100 to 400
ppm. This method of increasing the CO/C0
2 ratio is disclosed in copending applications Ser. No. filed March 23, 1981 for "Addition
of MgCl
2 to Catalyst" and Ser. No. filed March 23, 1981 for "Addition of Chlorine to Regenerator",
both in the name of George D. Myers.
[0028] The use of a reducing atmosphere within the regenerator is especially useful in combusting
coke in zones where the coke level approaches or is reduced below about 0.05 percent,
and it is preferred to have a CO/CO
2 ratio of at least about 0.25 in zones where the coke loading is less than about 0.05
percent by weight.
[0029] It is especially useful to keep the vanadium in a reduced state under conditions
wherein the particles are in contact or in relatively frequent contact with each other.
Consequently, it is especially contemplated, in carrying out this method, of maintaining
a reducing atmosphere in zones within the regenerator wherein the catalyst particles
are in a relatively dense bed, such as in a dense fluidized or settled bed. A reducing
gas such as CO, methane, or ammonia may be added to a zone having a dense catalyst
phase, such as for example a bed having a density of about 25 to about 50 pounds per
cubic foot.
[0030] In another method of carrying out this invention, a riser regenerator is used as
one stage in a multi-stage re
gen- erator to contact the catalyst with an oxidizing atmosphere for a short period
of time, such as for example less than about two seconds and preferably less than
about one second. The riser stage of the regenerator has the advantage in reducing
the carbon concentration to a level less than about 0.15 percent or-less than about
0.05 percent, that vanadium, which is no longer protected by a coating of carbon,
may not be in an oxidizing atmosphere for a long enough time to form molten +5 vanadium.
Further, the low density of the particles in the riser-regenerator, minimizes coalescence
of those particles which may have liquid pentavalent vanadia on their surfaces.
[0031] In the preferred method of using a riser regenerator, the particles are contacted
with a reducing atmosphere, such as one containing CO or other reducing gas, after
leaving the riser. The particles may then be accumulated, as for example, in a settled
bed, before being recycled to contact additional fresh feed. The catalyst particles
to be accumulated are contacted with a reducing atmosphere, preferably immediately
after leaving the riser and before accumulating in a dense bed of regenerated particles,
and in the preferred method of carrying out this process the particles are retained
in a reducing atmosphere within such dense bed, and in the most preferred method a
reducing atmosphere is provided for the particles until about the time they are contacted
with fresh feed.
[0032] The preferred riser regenerator is similar to the vented riser reactor as is disclosed
in U.S. Patents 4,066,533 and 4,070,159 to Myers et al which achieves ballistic separation
of gaseous products from catalyst. This apparatus has the advantages of achieving
virtually instantaneous separation of the regenerated catalyst, now containing some
vanadia to which any oxygen present would have access, from the oxidizing atmosphere.
[0033] In the preferred method of reducing the coke concentration to a level less than about
0.15 and especially to less than 0.05% the catalyst is contacted with a reducing atmosphere,
preferably immediately after its separation from the oxidizing atmosphere and most
preferably also in collection zones for the regenerated catalyst.
[0034] This invention may be used in processing any hydrocarbon feed containing a significant
concentration of vanadium, and FCC as well as RCC processes are contemplated. It is,
however, especially useful in processing reduced crudes having high metal and high
Conradson carbon values, and the invention will be described in detail with respect
to its use in processing an RCC feed.
[0035] The carbo-metallic feed comprises or is composed of oil which boils above about 650°F.
Such oil, or at least the 650°F+ portion thereof, is characterized by a heavy metal
content of at least about 4, preferably more than about 5, and most preferably at
least about 5.5 ppm of Nickel Equivalents by weight and by a carbon residue on pyrolysis
of at least about 1% and more preferably at least about 2% by weight. In accordance
with the invention, the carbo-metallic feed, in the form of a pumpable liquid, is
brought into contact with hot conversion catalyst in a weight ratio of catalyst to
feed in the range of about 3 to about 18 and preferably more than about 6.
[0036] The feed in said mixture undergoes a conversion step which includes cracking while
the mixture of feed and catalyst is flowing through a progressive flow type reactor.
The feed, catalyst, and other materials may be introduced at one or more points. The
reactor includes an elongated reaction chamber which is at least partly vertical or
inclined and in which the feed material, resultant products and catalyst are maintained
in contact with one another while flowing as a dilute phase or stream for a predetermined
riser residence time in the range of about 0.5 to about 10 seconds.
[0037] The reaction is conducted at a temperature of about 900° to about 1400°F, measured
at the reaction chamber exit, under a total pressure of about 10 to about 50 psia
(pounds per square inch absolute) under conditions sufficiently severe to provide
a conversion per pass in the range of about 50% or more and to lay down coke on the
catalyst in an amount in the range of about 0.3 to about 3% by weight and preferably
at least about 0.5%. The overall rate of coke production, based on weight of fresh
feed, is in the range of about 4 to about 14% by weight.
[0038] At the end of the predetermined residence time, the catalyst is separated from the
products, is stripped to remove high boiling components and other entrained or adsorbed
hydrocarbons and is then regenerated with oxygen-conta-n-ing combustion-supporting
gas under conditions of time, temperature and atmosphere sufficient to reduce,the
carbon on the regenerated catalyst to about 0.25% or less.
[0039] Depending on how the process of the invention is practiced. one or more of the following
additional advantages may be realized. If desired, and preferably, the process may
be operated without added hydrogen in the reaction chamber. If desired, and preferably,
the process may be operated without prior hydrotreating of the feed and/or without
other process of removal of asphaltenes of metals from the feed, and this is true
even where the carbo-metallic oil as a whole contains more than about 4, or more than
about 5 or even more than about 5.5 ppm Nickel Equivalents by weight of heavy metal
and has a carbon residue on pyrolysis greater than about 1%, greater than about 1.4%
or greater than about 2% by weight. Moreover, all of the converter feed, as above
described, may be cracked in one and the same conversion chamber. The cracking reaction
may be carried out with a catalyst which has previously been used (recycled, except
for such replacement as required to compensate for normal losses and deactivation)
to crack a carbo-metallic feed under the above described conditions. Heavy hydrocarbons
not cracked to gasoline in a first pass may be recycled with or without hydrotreating
for further cracking in contact with the same kind of feed in which they were first
subjected to cracking conditions, and under the same kind of conditions; but operation
in a substantially once-through or single pass mode (e.g. less than about 15% by volume
of recycle based on volume of fresh feed) is preferred.
[0040] According to one preferred embodiment or aspect of the invention, at the end of the
predetermined residence time referred to above, the catalyst is projected in a direction
established by the elongated reaction chamber or an extension thereof, while the products,
having lesser momentum, are caused to make an abrupt change of direction, resulting
in an abrupt, substantially instantaneous ballistic separation of products from catalyst.
The thus separated catalyst is then stripped, regenerated and recycled to the reactor
as above described.
[0041] According to another preferred embodiment or aspect of the invention, the converter
feed contains 650°F+ material which has not been hydrotreated and is characterized
in part by containing at least about 5.5 parts per million of nickel equivalents of
heavy metals. The converter feed is brought together not only with the above mentioned
cracking catalyst, but also with additional gaseous material including steam whereby
the resultant suspension of catalyst and feed also includes gaseous material wherein
the ratio of the partial pressure of the added gaseous material relative to that of
the feed is in the range of about 0.25 to about 4.0. The vapor residence time is in
the range of about 0.5 to about 3 seconds when practicing this embodiment or aspect
of the invention. This preferred' embodiment or aspect and the one referred to in
the preceeding paragraph may be used in combination with one another or separately.
[0042] According to another preferred embodiment or aspect of the invention, the carbo-metallic
feed is not only brought into contact with the catalyst, but also with one or more
additional materials including particularly liquid water in a weight ratio relative
to feed ranging from about 0.04 to about 0.25, more preferably about 0.04 to about
0.2 and still more preferably about 0.05 to about 0.15. Such additional materials,
including the liquid water, may be brought into admixture with the feed prior to,
during or after mixing the feed with the aforementioned catalyst, and either after
or, preferably, before, vaporization of the feed. The feed, catalyst and water (e.g.
in the form of liquid water or in the form of steam produced by vaporization of liquid
water in contact with the feed) are introduced into the progressive flow type reactor,
which may or may not be a reactor embodying the above described ballistic separation,
at one or more points along the reactor. While the mixture of feed, catalyst and steam
produced by vaporization of the liquid water flows through the reactor, the feed undergoes
the above mentioned conversion step which includes cracking. The feed material, catalyst,
steam and resultant products are maintained in.contact with one another in the above
mentioned elongated reaction chamber while flowing as a dilute phase or stream for
the above mentioned predetermined riser residence time which is in the range of about
0.5 to about 10 seconds.
[0043] The present'invention provides a process for the continuous catalytic conversion
of a wide variety of carbo- metallic oils to lower molecular weight products, while
maximizing production of highly valuable liquid products, and making it possible,
if desired, to avoid vacuum distillation and other expensive treatments such as hydrotreating.
The term "oils", includes not only those predominantly hydrocarbon compositions which
are liquid at room temperature (i.e., 63°F), but also those predominantly hydrocarbon
compositions which are asphalts or tars at ambient temperature but liquify when heated
to temperatures in the range of up to about 800°F. The invention is applicable to
carbo-metallic oils, whether of petroleum origin or not. For example, provided they
have the requisite boiling range, carbon residue on pyrolysis and heavy metals content,
the invention may be applied to the processing of such widely diverse materials as
heavy bottoms from crude oil, heavy bitumen crude oil, those crude oils known as "heavy
crude" which approximate the properties of reduced crude, shale oil, tar sand extract,
products from coal liquification and solvated coal, atmospheric and vacuum reduced
crude, extracts and/or bottoms (raffinate) from solvent de-asphalting, aromatic extract
from lube oil refining, tar bottoms, heavy cycle oil, slop oil, other refinery waste
streams and mixtures of the foregoing. Such mixtures can for instance be prepared
by mixing available hydrocarbon fractions, including oils, tars, pitches and the like.
Also, powdered coal may be suspended in the carbo-metallic oil. Persons skilled in
the art are aware of techniques for demetalation of carbo- metallic oils, and demetalated
oils may be converted using the invention; but it is an advantage of the invention
that it can employ as feedstock carbo-metallic oils that have had no prior demetalation
treatment. Likewise, the invention can be applied to hydrotreated feedstocks; but
it is an advantage of the invention that it can success. fully convert carbo-metallic
oils which have had substantially no prior hydrotreatment. However, the preferred
application of the process is to reduced crude, i.e., that fraction of crude oil boiling
at and above 650°F, alone or in admixture with virgin gas oils. While the use of material
that has been subjected to prior vacuum distillation is not excluded, it is an advantage
of the invention that it can satisfactorily process material which has had no prior
vacuum distillation, thus saving on capital investment and operating costs as compared
to conventional FCC processes that require a vacuum distillation unit.
[0044] In accordance with the invention one provides a carbo- metallic oil feedstock, at
least about 70%, more preferably at least about 85% and still more preferably about
100% (by volume) of which boils at and above about 650°F. All boiling temperatures
herein are based on standard atmospheric pressure conditions. In carbo-metallic oil
partly or wholly composed of material which boils at and above about 650°F, such material
is referred to herein as 650°F+ material; and 650°F+ material which is part of or
has been separated from an oil containing components boiling above and below 650°F
may be referred to as a 650°F+ fraction. but the terms "boils above" and "650°F+"
are not intended to imply that all of the material characterized by said terms will
have the capability of boiling. The carbo- metallic oils contemplated by the invention
may contain material which may not boil under any conditions; for example, certain
asphalts and asphaltenes may crack thermally during distillation, apparently without
boiling. Thus, for example, when it is said that the feed comprises at least about
70o by volume of material which boils above about 650°F, it should be understood that
the 70% in question may include some material which will not boil or volatilize at
any temperature. These non-boilable - materials when present, may frequently or for
the most part be concentrated in portions of the feed which do not boil below about
1000°F, 1025°F or higher. Thus, when it is said that at least about 10%, more preferably
about 15% and still more preferably at least about 20% (by volume) of the 650°F+ fraction
will not boil below about 1000°F or 1025°F, it should be understood that all or any
part of the material not boiling below about 1000° or 1025°F, may or may not be volatile
at and above the indicated temperatures.
[0045] Preferably, the contemplated feeds, or at least the 650°F+ material therein, have
a carbon residue on pyrolysis of at least about 2 or greater. For example, the Conradson
carbon content may be in the range of about 2 to about 12 and most frequently at least
about 4. A particularly common range is about 4 to about 8.
[0046] Preferably, the feed has an average composition characterized by an atomic hydrogen
to carbon ratio in the range of about 1.2 to about 1.9, and preferably about 1.3 to
about 1.8.
[0047] The carbo-metallic feeds employed in accordance with the invention, or at least the
650°F+ material therein, may contain at least about 4 parts per million of Nickel
Equivalents, as defined above, of which at least about 01. ppm is vanadium. Carbometallic
oils within the above range can be prepared from mixtures of two or more oils, some
of which do and some of which do not contain the quantities of Nickel Equivalents
and vanadium set forth above. It should also be noted that the above values for Nickel
Equivalents and nickel represent time-weighted averages for a substantial period of
operation of the conversion unit, such as one month, for example. It should also be
noted that the heavy metals have in certain circumstances exhibited some lessening
of poisoning tendency after repeated oxidations and reductions on the catalyst, and
the literature describes criteria for establishing "effective metal" values. For example,
see the article by Cimbalo, et al, entitled "Deposited Metals Poison FCC Catalyst",
Oil and Gas Journal, May 15, 1972, pp 112-122, the contents of which are incorporated
herein by reference. If considered necessary or desirable, the contents of Nickel
Equivalents and vanadium in the carbometallic oils processed according to the invention
may be expressed in terms of "effective metal" values. Notwithstanding the gradual
reduction in poisoning activity noted by Cimbalo, et al, the regeneration of catalyst
under normal FCC regeneration conditions may not, and usually does not, severely impair
the dehydrogenation, demethanation and aromatic condensation activity of heavy metals
accumulated on cracking catalyst.
[0048] It is known that about 0.2 to about 5 weight per cent of "sulfur" in the form of
elemental sulfur and/or its compounds (but reported as elemental sulfur based on the
weight of feed) appears in FCC feeds and that the sulfur and modified forms of sulfur
can find that way into the resultant gasoline product and, where lead is added, tend
to reduce its susceptibility to octane enhancement. Sulfur in the product gasoline
often requires sweetening when processing high sulfur containing crudes. To the extent
that sulfur is present in the coke, it also represents a potential air pollutant since
the regenerator burns it to S0
2 and 50
3. However, we have found that in our process the sulfur in the feed is on the other
hand able to inhibit heavy metal activity by maintaining metals such as Ni, V, Cu
and Fe in the sulfide form in the reactor. These sulfides are much less active than
the metals themselves in promoting dehydrogenation and coking reactions. Accordingly,
it is acceptable to carry out the invention with a carbo-metallic oil having at least
about 0.3%, acceptably more than about 0.8% and more acceptably at least about 1.5%
by weight of sulfur in the 650°F+ fraction.
[0049] The carbo-metallic oils useful in the invention may and usually do contain significant
quantities of compounds containing nitrogen, a substantial portion of which may be
basic nitrogen. For example, the total nitrogen content of the carbo-metallic oils
may be at least about 0.05% by weight. Since cracking catalysts owe their cracking
activity to acid sites on the catalyst surface or in its pores, basic nitrogen-containing
compounds may temporarily neutralize these sites, poisoning the catalyst. However,
the catalyst is not permanently damaged since the nitrogen can be burned off the catalyst
during regeneration, as a result of which the acidity of the active sites is restored.
[0050] The carbo-metallic oils may also include significant- quantities of pentane insolubles,
for example at least about 0.5% by weight, and more typically 2% or more or even about
4% or more. These may include for instance asphaltenes and other materials.
[0051] Alkali and alkaline earth metals generally do not tend to vaporize in large quantities
under the distillation conditions employed in distilling crude oil to prepare the
vacuum gas oils normally used as
FCC feedstocks. Rather, these metals remain for the most part in the "bottoms" fraction
(the non-vaporized high boiling portion) which may for instance be used in the production
of asphalt or other by-products. However, reduced crude and other carbo- metallic
oils are in many cases bottoms products, and therefore may contain significant quantities
of alkali - and alkaline earth metals such as sodium. These metals deposit upon the
catalyst during cracking. Depending on the composition of the catalyst and magnit
Lde of the re
gen- eration temperatures to which it is exposed, these metals may undergo interactions
and reactions with the catalyst (including the catalyst support) which are not normally
experienced in processing VGO under conventional FCC processing conditions. If the
catalyst characteristics and regeneration conditions so require, one will of course
take the necessary precautions to limit the amounts of alkali and alkaline earth metal
in the feed, which metals may enter the feed not only as brine associated with the
crude oil in its natural state, but also as components of water or steam which are
supplied to the cracking unit. Thus, careful desalting of the crude used to prepare
the carbo-metallic feed may be important when the catalyst is particularly susceptible
to alkali and alkaline earth metals. In such circumstances, the content of such metals
(hereinafter collectively referred to as "sodium") in the feed can be maintained at
about 1 ppm or less, based on the weight of the feedstock. Alternatively, the sodium
level of the feed may be keyed to that of the catalyst; so as to maintain the sodium
level of the catalyst which is in use substantially the same as or less than that
of the replacement catalyst which is charged to the unit.
[0052] According to a particularly preferred embodiment of the invention, the carbo-metallic
oil feedstock constitutes at least about 70% by volume of material which boils above
about 650°F, and at least about 10% of the material which boils above about 650°F
will not boil below about 1025°F. The average composition of this 650°F+ material
may be further characterized by: (a) an atomic hydrogen to carbon ratio in the range
of about 1.3 to about 1.8; (b) a Conradson carbon value of at least about 2; (c) at
least about four parts per million of Nickel Equivalents, as defined above, of which
at least about two parts per million is nickel (as metal, by weight), at least about
0.1 part per million vanadium; and (d) at least one of the following: (i) at least
about 0.3% by weight of sulfur, (ii), at least about 0.05% by weight of nitrogen,
and (iii) at least about 0.5% by weight of pentane insolubles. Very commonly, the
preferred feed will include all of (i), (ii) and (iii), the other components found
in oils of petroleum and non-petroleum origin may also be present in varying quantities
providing they do not prevent operation of the process.
[0053] Although there is no intention of excluding the possibility of using a feedstock
which has previously been subjected to some cracking, the present invention has the
definite advantage that it can successfully product large conversions and very substantial
yields of liquid hydrocarbon fuels from carbo-metallic oils which have not been subjected
to any substantial amount of cracking. Thus, for example, and preferably, at least
about 85%, more preferably at least about 90% and most preferably substantially all
of of the carbo-metallic feed introduced into the present process is oil which has
not previously been contacted with cracking catalyst under cracking conditions. Moreover,
the process of the invention is suitable for operation in a substantially once-through
or single pass mode. Thus, the volume of recycle, if any, based on the volume of fresh
feed is preferably about 15% or less and more preferably about 10% or less.
[0054] In general, the weight ratio of catalyst to fresh feed (feed which has not previously
been exposed to cracking catalyst under carcking conditions) used in the process is
in the range of about 3 to about 18. Preferred and more preferred ratios are about
4 to about 12, more preferably about 5 to about 10 and still more preferably about
6 to about 10, a ratio of about 10 presently being considered most nearly optimum.
Within the limitations of product quality reauirements, controlling the catalyst to
oil ratio at relatively low levels within the aforesaid ranges tends to reduce the
coke yield of the process, based on fresh feed.
[0055] In conventional FCC processing of VGO, the ratio between the number of barrels per
day of plant through-put and the total number of tons of catalyst undergoing circulation
throughout all phases of the process can vary widely. For purposes of this disclosure,
daily plant through-put is defined as the number of barrels of fresh feed boiling
above about 650°F which that plant processes per average day of operation to liquid
products boiling below about 430°F. For example, in one commercially successful type
of FCC-VGO operation., about 8 to about 12 tons of catalyst are under circulation
in the process per 1000 barrels per day of plant through-put. In another commercially
successful process, this ratio is in the range of about 2 to 3. While the present
invention may be practiced in the range of about 2 to about 30 and more typically
about 2 to about 12 tons of catalyst inventory per 1000 barrels of daily plant through-put,
it is preferred to carry out the process of the present invention with a very small
ratio of catalyst weight to daily plant through-put. More specifically, it is preferred
to carry out the process of the present invention with an inventory of catalyst that
is sufficient to contact the feed for the desired residence time in the above indicated
catalyst to oil ratio while minimizing the amount of catalyst inventory, relative
to plant through-put, which is undergoing circulation or being held for treatment
in other phases of the process such as, for example, stripping, regeneration and the
like. Thus, more particularly, it is preferred to carry out the process of the present
invention with about 2 to about 5 and more preferably about 2 tons of catalyst inventory
or less per thousand barrels of daily plant through-put.
[0056] In the practice of the invention, catalyst may be added continuously or periodically,
such as, for example, to make up for normal losses of catalyst from the system. Moreover,
catalyst addition may be conducted in conjunction with withdrawal of catalyst, such
as, for example, to maintain or increase the average activity level of the catalyst
in the unit. For example, the rate at which virgin catalyst is added to the unit may
be in the range of about 0.1 to about 3, more preferably about 0.15 to about 2, and
most preferably to about 0.2 to about 1.5 pounds per barrel of feed. If on the other
hand equilibrium catalyst from FCC operation is to be utilized, replacement rates
as high as about 5 pounds per barrel can be practiced. Where circumstances are such
that the catalyst employed in the unit is below average in resistance to deactivation
and/or conditions prevailing in the unit are- such as to promote more rapid deactivation,-one
may employ rates of addition greater than those stated above; but in the opposite
circumstances, lower rates of addition may be employed. By way of illustration, if
a unit were operated with a metal(s) loading of 5000 ppm Ni + V in parts by weight
on equilibrium catalyst, one might for example emplov a replacement rate of about
2.7 pounds of catalyst introduced for each'barrel (42 gallons) of feed processed.
However, operation at a higher level such as 10,000 p
pm Ni + V on catalyst would enable one to substantially reduce the replacement rate,
such as for example to about 1.3 pounds of catalyst per barrel of feed. Thus, the
levels of metal(s) on catalyst and catalyst replacement rates may in general be respectively
increased and decreased to any value consistent with the catalvst activity which is
available and desired for conducting the process.
[0057] Without wishing to be bound by any theory, it appears that a number of features of
the process to be described in greater detail below, such as, for instance, the residence
time and optional mixing of steam with the feedstock, tend to restrict the extent
to which cracking conditions produce metals in the reduced state on the catalyst from
heavy metal sulfide(s), sulfate(s) or oxide(s) deposited on the catalyst particles
by prior exposures to carbo-metallic feedstocks and regeneration conditions. Thus,
the process appears to afford significant control over the poisoning effect of heavy
metals on the catalyst even when the accumulations of such metals are quite substantial.
[0058] Accordingly, the process may be practised with catalyst bearing high accumulations
of heavy metal(s) in the form of elemental metal(s), oxide(s), sulfide(s) or other
compounds. Thus, operation of the process with catalyst bearing heavy metals accumulations
in the range of about 3000 or more ppm Nickel Equivalents, on the average, is contemplated.
The concentration of Nickel Equivalents of metals on catalyst can range up to about
50,000 ppm or higher. More specifically, the accumulation may be in the range of about
3000 to about 30,000 ppm, preferably in the range of about 3000 to 20,000 ppm, and
more particularly about 3000 to about 12,000 ppm. Within these ranges just mentioned,
operation at metals levels of about 4000 or more, about 5000 or more, or about 7000
or more ppm can tend to reduce the rate of catalyst replacement required. The foregoing
ranges are based on parts per million of Nickel Equivalents, in which the metals are
expressed as metal, by weight, measured on and based on regenerated ecuilibrium catalyst.
However, in the event that catalyst of adequate activity is available at very low
cost, making feasible very high rates of catalyst replacement, the carbo-metallic
oil could be converted to lower boiling liquid products with catalyst bearing less
than 3,000 p
pm Nickel Ecuiva- lents of heavy metals. For example, one might employ equilibrium
catalyst from another unit, for example, an FCC unit which has been used in the cracking
of a feed, e.
g. vacuum gas oil, having a carbon residue on pyrolysis of less than 1 and containing
less than about 4 ppm Nickel Equivalents of heavy metals.
[0059] In any event, the equilibrium concentration of heavy metals in the circulating inventory
of catalyst can be controlled (including maintained or varied as desired or needed)
by manipulation of the rate of catalyst addition discussed above. Thus, for example,
addition of catal;st may be maintained at a rate which will control the heavy metals
accumulation on the catalyst in one of the ranges set forth above.
[0060] In general, it is preferred to employ a catalyst having a relatively high level of
cracking activity, providing high levels of conversion and productivity at low residence
times. The conversion capabilities of the catalyst may be expressed in terms of the
conversion produced during actual operation of the process and/or in terms of conversion
produced in standard catalyst activity tests. For example, it is preferred to employ
catalyst which, in the course of extended operation under prevailing process conditions,
is sufficiently active for sustaining a level of conversion of at least about 50%
and more preferably at least about 60%. In this connection, conversion is expressed
in liquid volume percent, based on fresh feed.
[0061] Also, for example, the preferred catalyst may be defined as one which, in its virgin
or equilibrium state, exhibits a specified activity expressed as a percentage in terms
of MAT (micro-activity test) conversion. For purposes of the present invention the
foregoing percentage is the volume percentage of standard feedstock which a catalyst
under evaluation will convert to 430°F end point gasoline, lighter products and coke
at 900°F, 16 WHSV (weight hourly space velocity, calculated on a moisture free basis,
using clean catalyst which has been dried at 1100°F, weighed and then conditioned,
for a period of at least 8 hours at about 25°C and 50% relative humidity, until about
one hour or less prior to contacting the feed) and 3C/O (catalyst to oil weight ratio)
by ASTM D-32 MAT test D-3907-80, using an appropriate standard feedstock, e.g. a sweet
light primary gas oil, such as that used by Davison, Division of
W.
R. Grace, having the following analysis and properties:

[0062] The gasoline end point and boiling temperature-volume percent relationships of the
product produced in the MAT conversion test may for example be determined by simulated
distillation techniques, for example modifications of gas chromate graphic "Sim-D",
ASTM D-2887-73. The results of such simulations are in reasonable agreement with the
results obtained by subjecting larger samples of material to standard laboratory distillation
techniques. Conversion is calculated by subtracting from 100 the volume percent (based
on fresh feed) of those products heavier than gasoline which remain in the recovered
product.
[0063] On page 935-937 of Hougen and Watson, Chemical Process Princinles, John Wiley & Sons,
Inc., N.Y. (1947), the con- cent of "Activity Factors" is discussed. This concept
leads to the use of "relative activity" to compare the effectiveness of an operating
catalyst against a standard catalyst. Relative activity measurements facilitate reco
g- nition of how the quantity reauirements of various catalysts differ from one another.
Thus, relative activity is a ratio obtained by dividing the weight of a standard or
reference catalyst which is or would be required to produce a given level of conversion,
as compared to the weight of an operating catalyst (whether proposed or actually used)
which is or would be recuired to produce the same level of conversion in the same
or equivalent feedstock under the same or equivalent conditions. Said ratio of catalyst
weights may be expressed as a numerical ratio, but preferably is converted to a percentage
basis. The standard catalyst is preferably chosen from among catalysts useful for
conducting the present invention, such as for example zeolite fluid cracking catalysts,
and is chosen for its ability to produce a predetermined level of conversion in a
standard feed under the conditions of temperature, WHV, catalyst to oil ratio and
other conditions set forth in the preceding description of the MAT conversion test
and in ASTM D-32 MAT test D-3907-80. Conversion is the volume percentage of feedstock
that is converted to 430°F endpoint gasoline, lighter products and coke. For standard
feed, one may employ the above-mentioned light primary gas oil, or equivalent.
[0064] For purposes of conducting relative activity determinations, one may prepare a "standard
catalyst curve", a chart or graph of conversion (as above defined) vs. reciprocal
WHSV for the standard catalyst and feedstock. A sufficient number of runs is made
under ASTM D-3907-80 conditions (as modified above) using standard feedstock at varying
levels of WHSV to prepare an accurate "curve" of conversion vs. WHSV for the standard
feedstock. This curve should traverse all or substantially all of the various levels
of conversion including the range of conversion within which it is expected that the
operating catalyst will be tested. From this curve, one may establish a standard WHSV
for test comparisons and a standard value of reciprocal WHSV corres- poinding to that
level of conversion which has been chosen to represent 100% relative activity in the
standard catalyst. For purposes of the present disclosure the afor- mentioned reciprocal
WHSV and level of conversion are, respectively, 0.0625 and 75%. In testing an operating
catalyst of unknown relative activity, one conducts a sufficient number of runs with
that catalyst under D-3907-80 conditions (as modified above) to establish the level
of conversion which is or would be produced with the operating catalyst at standard
reciprocal WHSV. Then, using the above-mentioned standard catalyst curve, one establishes
a hypothetical reciprocal WHSV constituting the reciprocal WHSV which would have been
required, using the standard catalyst, to obtain the same level of conversion which
was or would be exhibited, by the operating catalyst at standard WHSV. The relative
activity may then be calculated by dividing the hypothetical reciprocal WHSV by the
reciprocal standard WHSV, which is 1/16, or .0625. The result is relative activity
expressed in terms of a decimal fraction, which may then be multiplied by 100 to convert
to percent relative activity. In applying the results of this determination, a relative
activity of 0.5, or 50%, means that it would take twice the amount of the operating
catalyst to give the same conversion as the standard catalyst, i.e., the production
catalyst is 50% as active as the reference catalyst.
[0065] The catalyst may be introduced into the process-in its virgin form or, as previously
indicated, in other than virgin form: e.g. one may use equilibrium catalyst withdrawn
from another unit, such as catalyst that has been employed in the cracking of a different
feed. Whether characterized on the basis of MAT conversion activity or relative activity,
the preferred catalysts may be described on the basis of their activity "as introduced"
into the process of the present invention, or on the basis of their "as withdrawn"
or equilibrium activity in the process of the present invention, or on both of these
bases. A preferred activity level of virgin and non-virgin catalyst "as introduced"
into the process of the present invention is at least about 60% by MAT conversion,
and preferably at least about 20%, more preferably at least about 40% and still more
preferably at least about 60% in terns of relative activity. However, it will be appreciated
that, particularly in the case of non-virgin catalysts supplied at high addition rates,
lower activity levels may be acceptable. An acceptable "as withdrawn" or equilibrium
activity level of catalyst which has-been used in the process of the present invention
is at least about 20% or more, but about 40% or more and preferably about 60% or more
are preferred values on a relative activity basis, and an activity level of 60% or
more on a M
AT conversion basis is also contemplated. More preferably, it is desired to employ
a catalyst which will, under the conditions of use in the unit, establish an equilibrium
activity at or above the indicated level. The catalyst activities are determined with
catalyst having less than 0.01 coke, e.g. regenerated catalyst.
[0066] One may employ any hydrocarbon cracking catalyst having the above indicated conversion
capabilities. A particularly preferred class of catalysts includes those which have
pore structures into which molecules of feed malarial may enter for adsorption and/or
for contact with active catalytic sites within or adjacent the pores. Various types
of catalysts are available within this classification, including for example the layered
silicates, e.g. smectites. Although the most widely available catalysts within this
classification are the well-known zeolite-containing catalysts, non-zeolite catalysts
are also contemplated.
[0067] The preferred zeolite-containing catalysts may include any zeolite, whether natural,
semi-synthetic or synthetic, alone or in admixture with other materials which do not
significantly impair the suitability of the catalyst, provided the resultant catalyst
has the activity and pore structure referred to above. For example, if the virgin
catalyst is a mixture, it may include the zeolite component associated with or dispersed
in a porous refractory inorganic oxide carrier, in such case the catalyst may for
example contain about 1% to about 60%, more nreferably about 15 to about 50%, and
most typically about 20 to about 45% by weight, based on the total weight of catalyst
(water free basis) of the zeolite, the balance of the catalyst being the porous refractory
inorganic oxide alone or in combination with any of the known adjuvants for promoting
or suppressing various desired and undesired reactions. For a general explanation
of the genus of zeolite, molecular sieve catalysts useful in'the invention, attention
is drawn to the disclosures of the articles entitled "Refinery Catalysts Are a Fluid
Business" and "Making Cat Crackers Work On Varied Diet", appearing respectively in
the July 26, 1978 and September 13, 1978 issues of Chemical Week magazine. The descriptions
of the aforementioned publications are incorporated herein by reference.
[0068] For the most part, the zeolite components of the zeolite-containing catalysts will
be those which are known to be useful in FCC cracking processes. In general, these
are crystalline aluminosilicates, typically made up of tetra coordinated aluminum
atoms associated throuch oxygen atoms with adjacent silicon atoms in the crystal structure.
However, the term "zeolite" as used in this disclosure contemplates not only aluminosilicates,
but also substances in which the aluminum has been partly'or wholly replaced, such
as for instance by gallium and/or other metal atoms, and further includes substances
in which all or part of the silicon has been replaced, such as for instance by germanium.
Titanium and zirconium substitution may also be practiced.
[0069] Most zeolites are prepared or occur naturally in the sodium form, so that sodium
cations are associated with the electronegative sites in the crystal structure. The
sodium cations tend to make zeolites inactive and much less stable when exposed to
hydrocarbon conversion conditions, particularly high temperatures. Accordingly, the
zeolite may be ion exchanged, and where the zeolite is a component of a catalyst composition,
such ion exchanging may occur before or after incorporation of the zeolite as a component
of the composition. Suitable cations for replacement of sodium in the zeolite crystal
structure include ammonium (decomposable to hydrogen), hydrogen, rare earth metals,
alkaline earth metals, etc. Various suitable ion exchange procedures and cations which
may be exchanged into the zeolite crystal structure are well known to those skilled
in the art.
[0070] Examples of the naturally occurin
g crystalline aluminosilicate zeolites which may be used as or included in the catalyst
for the present invention are faujasite, mordenite, clinoptilote, chabazite, analcite,
crionite, as well as levynite, dachiardite, paulingite, noselite, ferriorite, heulandite,
scolccite, stibite, harmotome, phillipsite, brewsterite, flarite, datolite, gmelinite,
caumnite, leucite, lazurite, scaplite, mesolite, ptolite, ne
phline, matrolite, offretite and sodalite.
[0071] Examples of the synthetic crystalline aluminosilicate zeolites which are useful as
or in the catalyst for carrying out the present invention are Zeolite X, U. S. Patent
No= 2,882,244, Zeolite Y, U. S. Patent No. 3,130,007: and Zeolite A, U. S. Patent
No. 2,882,243; as well as Zeolite B, U. S. Patent No. 3,008,803; Zeolite D, Canada
Patent No. 661,981; Zeolite
E, Canada Patent No. 614,495; Zeolite F, U. S. Patent No. 2,996,358; Zeolite H. U.
S. Patent No. 3,010,789; Zeolite J., U. S. Patent No. 3,011,869; Zeolite L, Belgian
Patent No. 575,177; Zeolite M., U. S. Patent No. 2,995,423, Zeolite 0, U. S. Patent
No. 3,140,252; Zeolite Q, U. S. Patent No. 2,991,151; Zeolite S. U. S. Patent No.
3,054,657, Zeolite T, U. S. Patent No. 2,950,952; Zeolite W, U. S. Patent No. 3,012,853;
Zeolite Z, Canada Patent No. 614,495; and Zeolite Omega, Canada Patent No. 817,915.
Also, ZK-4HJ, alpha beta and ZSM-type zeolites are useful. Moreover, the zeolites
described in U. S. Patents Nos. 3,140,249, 3,140,253, 3,944,482 and 4,137,151 are
also useful, the disclosures of said patents being incorporated herein by reference.
[0072] The crystalline aluminosilicate zeolites having a faujasite-type crystal structure
are particularly preferred for use in the present invention. This includes particularly
natural faujasite and Zeolite X and Zeolite Y.
[0073] The crystalline aluminosilicate zeolites, such as synthetic faujasite, will under
normal conditions crystallize as regularly shaped, discrete particles of about one
to about ten microns in size, and, accordingly, this is the size range frequently
found in commercial catalysts which can be used in the invention. Preferably, the
particle size of the zeolites is from about 0.1 to about 10 microns and more preferably
is from about 0.1 to about 2 microns or less. For example, zeolites prepared in situ
from calcined kaolin may be characterized by even smaller crystallites. Crystalline
zeolites exhibit both an interior and an exterior surface area, which we have defined
as "portal" surface area, with the largest portion of the total surface area being
internal. By portal surface area, we refer to the outer surface of the zeolite crystal
through which reactants are considered to pass in order to convert to lower boiling
products: Blockages of the internal channels by, for example, coke formation, blockages
of entrance to the internal channels by deposition of coke in the portal surface area,
and contamination by metals poisoning, will greatly reduce the total zeolite surface
area. Therefore, to minimize the effect of contamination and pore blockage, crystals
larger than the normal size cited above are preferably not used in the catalysts of
this invention.
[0074] Commercial zeolite-containing catalysts are available with . carriers containing
a variety of metal oxides and combination thereof, including for example silica, alumina,
magnesia, and mixtures thereof and mixtures of such oxides with clays as e.g. described
in U. S. Patent No. 3,034,948. One may for example select any of the zeolite-containing
molecular sieve fluid cracking catalysts which are suitable for production of gasoline
from vacuum gas oils. However, certain advantages may be attained by judicious selection
of catalysts having marked resistance to metals. A metal resistant zeolite catalyst
is, for instance, described in U. S. Patent No. 3,944,482, in which the catalyst contains
1-40 weight percent of a rare earth-exchanged zeolite, the balance being a refractory
metal oxide having specified pore volume and size distribution. Other catalysts described
as "metals-tolerant" are described in the above mentioned Cimbalo et al article.
[0075] In general, it is preferred to employ catalysts having an over-all particle size
in the range of about 5 to about 160, more preferably about 40 to about 120, and most
preferably about 40 to about 80 microns. For exanole, a useful catalyst may have a
skeletal density of about 150 pounds per cubic foot and an average particle size of
about 60-70 microns, with less than 10% of the particles having a size less than about
40 microns and less than 80% having a size less than about 50-60 microns.
[0076] Although a wide variety of other catalysts, including both zeolite-containing and
non-zeolite-containing may be employed in the practice of the invention the following
are examples of commercially available catalysts which may be employed in practicing
the invention: '
[0077]

The AGZ-290, GRZ-1, CCZ-220 and Super DX catalysts referred to above are products
of W. R. Grace and Co. F-87 and FOC-90 are products of Filtrol, while HFZ-20 and HEZ-55
are products of Engelhard/Houdry. The above are properties of virgin catalyst and,
except in the case of zeolite content, are adjusted to a water free basis, i.e. based
on material ignited at 1750°F. The zeolite content is derived by comparison of the
X-ray intensities of a catalyst sample and of a standard material composed of high
purity sodium Y zeolite in accordance with draft #6, dated January 9, 1978, of proposed
ASTM Standard Method entitled "Determination of the Faujasite Content of a Catalyst."
[0078] Among the above mentioned commercially available catalysts, the Super D family and
especially a catalyst designated GRZ-1 are particularly preferred. For example, Super
DX has given particularly good results with Arabian light crude. The GRZ-1, although
substantially more expensive than the Super
DX at present, appears somewhat more metals-tolerant.
[0079] Although not yet commercially available, it is believed that the best catalysts for
carrying out the present invention will be those which, according to proposals advanced
by Dr. William P. Hettinger, Jr. and Dr. James E. Lewis, are characterized by matrices
with feeder pores having large minimum diameters and large mouths to facilitate diffusion
of high molecular weight molecules through the matrix to the portal surface area of
molecular sieve particles within the matrix. Such matrices preferably also have a
relatively large pore volume in order to soak up unvaporized portions of the carbo-metallic
oil feed. Thus significant numbers of liquid hydrocarbon molecules can diffuse to
active catalytic sites both in the matrix and in sieve particles on the surface of
the matrix. In general it is preferred to employ catalysts with matrices wherein the
feeder pores have diameters in the range of about 400-to about 6000 angstrom units,
and preferably about 1000 to about 6000 angstrom units.
[0080] It is considered an advantage that the process of the present invention can be conducted
in the substantial absence of tin and/or antimony or at least in the presence of a
catalyst which is substantially free of either or both of these metals.
[0081] The process of the present invention may be operated with the above described carbo-metallic
oil and catalyst as sub stantially the sole materials charged to the reaction zone
But the charging of additional materials is not excluded.
[0082] The charging of recycled oil to the reaction zone has already been mentioned. As
described in greater detail below, still other materials fulfilling a variety of functions
may also be charged..In such case, the carbo-metallic oil and catalyst usually represent
the major proportion by weight of the total of all materials charged to the reaction
zone.
[0083] Certain of the additional materials which may be used perform functions which offer
significant advantages over the process as performed with only the carbo-metallic
oil and catalyst. Among these functions are: controlling the effects of heavy metals
and other catalyst contaminants; enhancing catalyst activity; absorbing excess heat
in the catalyst as received from the regenerator; disposal of pollutants or conversion
thereof to a form or forms in which they may be more readily separated from products
and/ or disposed of: controlling catalyst temperature; diluting the carbo-metallic
oil vapors to reduce their partial pressure and increase the yield of desired products;
adjusting feed/catalyst contact time; donation of hydrogen to a hydrogen deficient
carbo-metallic oil feedstock, for example as disclosed in a United States application
entitled "Use of Naphtha in Carbo-Metallic Oil Conversion" and filed in the name of
George D. Myers on March 23, 1981, assisting in the dispersion of the feed; and possibly
also distillation of products. Certain of the metals in the heavy metals accumulation
on the catalyst are more active in promoting undesired reactions when they are in
the form of elemental metal, than they are when in the oxidised form produced by contact
with oxygen in the catalyst regenerator. However, the time of contact between catalyst
and vapors of feed and product in past conventional catalytic cracking was sufficient
so that hydrogen released in the cracking reaction was able to reconvert a significant
portion of the less harmful oxides back to the more harmful elemental heavy metals.
One can take advantage of this situation through the introduction of additional materials
which are in gaseous (including vaporous) form in the reaction zone in admixture with
the catalyst and vapors of feed and products. The increased volume of material in
the reaction zone resulting from the presence of such additional materials tends to
increase the velocity of flow through the reaction zone with a corresponding decrease
in the residence time of the catalyst and oxidized heavy metals borne thereby. Because
of this reduced residence time, there is less opportunity for reduction of the oxidized
heavy metals to elemental form and therefore less of the harmful elemental metals
are available for contacting the feed and products.
[0084] Added materials may be introduced into the process in any suitable fashion, some
examples of which follow. For instance, they may be admixed with the carbo-metallic
oil feedstock prior to contact of the latter with the catalyst. Alternatively, the
added materials may, if desired, be admixed with the catalyst prior to contact of
the latter with the feedstock. Separate portions of the added materials may be separately
admixed with both catalyst and carbo-metallic oil. Moreover, the feedstock, catalyst
and additional materials may, if desired, be brought together substantially simultaneously.
A portion of the added materials may be mixed with catalyst and/or carbo-metallic
oil in any of the above described ways, while additional portions are subsequently
brought into admixture. For example, a portion of the added materials may be added
to the carbo-metallic oil and/or to the catalyst before they reach the reaction zone,
while another portion of the added materials is introduced directly into the reaction
zone. The added materials may be introduced at a plurality of spaced locations in
the reaction zone or along the length thereof, if elongated.
[0085] The amount of additional materials which may be present in the feed, catalyst or
reaction zone for carrying out the above functions, and others, may be varied as desired:
but said amount will preferably be sufficient to substantially heat balance the process.
These materials may for example be introduced into the reaction zone in a weight ratio
relative to feed of up to about 0.4, preferably in the range of about 0.02 to about
0.4, more preferably about 0.03 to about 0.3 and most preferably about 0.05 to about
0.25.
[0086] For example, many or all of the above desirable functions may be attained by introducing
H
20 to the reaction zone in the form of steam or of liquid water or a combination thereof
in a weight ratio relative to feed in the range of about 0.04 or more, or more preferably
about 0.05 to about 0.1 or more. Without wishing to be bound by any theory, it appears
that the use of H
20 tends to inhibit reduction of catalyst-borne oxides, sulfites and sulfides to the
free metallic form which is believed to promote condensation-dehydrogenation with
consequent promotion of coke and hydrogen yield and accompanying loss of product.
Moreover, H
20 may also, to some extent, reduce deposition of metals onto the catalyst surface.
There may also be some tendency to desorb nitrogen-containing and other heavy contaminant-containing
molecules from the surface of the catalyst particles, or at least some tendency to
inhibit their absorption by the catalyst. It is also believed that added H
20 tends to increase the acidity of the catalyst by Bronsted acid formation which in
turn enhances the activity of the catalyst. Assuming the H
20 as supplied is cooler than the regenerated catalyst and/or the temperature of the
reaction zone, the sensible heat involved in raising the temperature of the H
20 upon contacting the catalyst in the reaction zone or elsewhere can absorb excess
heat from the catalyst. Where the H
20 is or includes recycled water that contains for example about 500 to about 5000
ppm of H
2S dissolved therein, a number of additional advantages may accrue. The ecologically
unattractive H
2S need not be vented to the atmosphere, the recycled water does not require further
treatment to remove H
2S and the H
2S may be of assistance in reducing coking of the catalyst by passivation of the heavy
metals, i.e. by conversion thereof to the sulfide form which has a lesser tendency
than the free metals to enhance coke and hydrogen production. In the reaction zone,
the presence of H
20 can dilute the carbo-metallic oil vapors, thus reducing their partial pressure and
tending to increase the yield of the desired products. It has been reported that H
20 is useful in combination with other materials in generating hydrogen during cracking;
thus it may be able to act as a hydrogen donor for hydrogen deficient carbo-metallic
oil feedstocks. The H
20 may also serve certain purely mechanical functions such as: assisting in the atomizing
or dispersion of the feed; competing with high molecular weight molecules for adsorption
on the surface of the catalyst, thus interrupting coke formation; steam distillation
of vaporizable product from unvaporized feed material; and disengagement of product
from catalyst upon conclusion of the cracking reaction. It is particularly preferred
to bring together H
-0, catalyst and carbo-metallic oil substantially simultaneously. For example, one
may admix H
20 and feedstock in an atomizing nozzle and immediately direct the resultant spray
into contact with the catalyst at the downstream end of the reaction zone.
[0087] The addition of steam to the reaction zone is frequently mentioned in the literature
of fluid catalytic cracking. Addition of liquid water to the feed is discussed relatively
infrequently, compared to the introduction of steam directly into the reaction zone.
However, in accordance with the present invention it is particularly preferred that
liquid water be brought into intimate admixture with the carbo-metallic oil in a weight
ratio of about 0.04 to about 0.25 at or prior to the time of introduction of the oil
into the reaction zone, whereby the water (e.g., in the form of liquid water or in
the form of steam produced by vaporization of liquid water in contact with the oil)
enters the reaction zone as part of the flow of feedstock which enters such zone.
Although not wishing to be bound by any theory, it is believed that the foregoing
is advantageous in promoting dispersion of the feedstock. Also, the heat of vaporization
of the water, which heat is absorbed from the catalyst, from the feedstock, or from
both, causes the water to be a more efficient heat sink than steam alone. Preferably
the weight ratio of liquid water to feed is about 0.04 to about 0.2 more preferably
about 0.05 to about 0.15.
[0088] Of course, the liquid water may be introduced into the process in the above described
manner or in other ways, and in either event the introduction of liquid water may
be accompanied by the introduction of additional amounts of water as steam into the
same or different portions of the reaction zone or into the catalyst and/or feedstock.
For example, the amount of additional steam may be in a weight ratio relative to feed
in the range of about 0.01 to about 0.25, with the weight ratio of total H20 (as steam
and liquid water) to feedstock being about 0.3 or less. The chargring weight ratio
of liauid water relative to steam in such confined use of liquid water and steam may
for example range from about 15 which is presently preferred, to about 0.2. Such ratio
may be maintained at a predetermined level within such range or varied as necessary
or desired to adjust or maintain heat balance.
[0089] Other materials may be added to the reaction zone to perform one or more of the above
described functions. For example, the dehydrogenation-condensation activity of heavy
metals may be inhibited by introducing hydrogen sulfide gas into the reaction zone.
Hydrogen may be made available for hydrogen deficient carbo-metallic oil feedstocks
bv introducing into the reaction zone either a conventional hydrogen donor diluent
such as a heavy naphtha or relatively low molecular weight carbon-hydrogen fragment
contributors, including for example: light paraffins; low molecular weight alcohols
and other compounds which permit or favor intermolecular hydrogen transfer; and compounds
that chemically combine to generate hydrogen in the reaction zone such as by reaction
of carbon monoxide with water, or with alcohols, or with olefins, or with other materials
or mixtures of the foregoing.
[0090] All of the above mentioned additional materials (including water), alone or in conjunction
with each other or in conjunction with other materials, such as nitrogen or other
inert gases, light hydrocarbons, and others, may perform any of the above-described
functions for which they are suitable, including without limitation, acting as diluents
to reduce feed partial pressure and/or as heat sinks to absorb excess heat present
in the catalyst as received from the regeneration step. The foregoing is a discussion
of some of the functions which can be performed by materials other than catalyst and
carbo-metallic oil feedstock introduced into the reaction zone, and it should be understood
that other materials may be added or other functions performed without departing from
the spirit of the invention.
[0091] The invention may be practiced in a wide variety of apparatus. However, the preferred
apparatus includes means for rapidly vaporizing as much feed as possible and efficiently
admixing feed and catalyst (although not necessarily in that order), for causing the
resultant mixture to flow as a dilute suspension in a progressive flow mode, and for
separating the catalyst from cracked products and any uncracked or only partially
cracked feed at the end of a predetermined residence time or times, it being preferred
that all or at least a substantial portion of the product should be abruptly separated
from at least a portion of the catalyst.
[0092] For example, the apparatus may include, along its elongated reaction chamber, one
or more points for introduction of carbo-metallic feed, one or more points for introduction
of catalyst, one or more points for introduction of additional material, one or more
points for withdrawal of products and one ormore points for withdrawal of catalyst.
[0093] The means for introducing feed, catalyst and other material may range from open pipes
to sophisticated jets or spray nozzles, it being preferred to use means capable of
breaking up the liquid feed into fine droplets. Preferably, the catalyst, liquid water
(when used) and fresh feed are brought together in an apparatus similar to that disclosed
in U. S. Patent Application Serial No. 969,601 of George D. Myers et al, filed December
14, 1978, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
According to a particularly preferred embodiment based on a suggestion which is understood
to have emanated from Mr. Steven M. Kovach, the liquid water and carbo-metallic oil,
prior to their introduction into the riser, are caused to pass through a propeller,
apertured disc, or any appropriate high shear agitating means for forcing a "homogenized
mixture" containing finely divided droplets of oil and/or water with oil and/or water
present as a continuous phase.
[0094] It is preferred that the reaction chamber, or at least the major portion thereof,
be more nearly vertical than horizontal and have a length to diameter ratio of at
least about 10, more preferably about 20 or 25 or more. Use of a vertical riser type
reactor is preferred. If tubular, the reactor can be of uniform diameter throughout
or may be provided with a continuous or step-wise increase in diameter along the reaction
path to maintain or vary the velocity along the flow path.
[0095] In general, the charging means (for catalyst and feed) and the reactor configuration
are such as to provide a relatively high velocity of flow and dilute suspension of
catalyst. For example, the vapor or catalyst velocity in the riser will be usually
at least about 25 and more typically at least about 35 feet per second. This velocity
may range up to about 55 or about 75 feet or about 100 feet per second or higher.
The vapor velocity at the top of the reactor may be higher than that at the bottom
and may for example be about 80 feet per second at the top and about 40 feet per second
at the bottom. The velocity capabilities of the reactor will in general be sufficient
to prevent substantial build-up of catalyst bed in the bottom or other portions of
the riser, whereby the catalyst loading in the riser can be maintained below about
4 or 5 pounds, as for example about 0.5 pounds, and below about 2 pounds, as for example
0.8 pound, per cubic foot, respectively, at the upstream (e.g. bottom) and downstream
(e.g. top) ends of the riser.
[0096] The progressive flow mode involves, for example, flowing of catalyst, feed and products
as a stream in a positively controlled and maintained direction established by the
elongated nature of the reaction zone. This is not to suggest however that there must
be strictly linear flow. As is well known, turbulent flow and "slippage" of catalyst
may occur to some extent especially in certain ranges of vapor velocity and some catalyst
loadings, although it has been reported adviseable to employ sufficiently low catalyst
loadings to restrict slippage and back-mixing.
[0097] Most preferably the reactor is one which abruptly separates a substantial portion
or all of the vaporized cracked products from the catalyst at one or more points along
the riser, and preferably separates substantially all of the vaporized cracked products
from the catalyst at the downstream end of the riser. A preferred type of reactor
embodies ballistic separation of catalyst and products;
[0098] that is, catalyst is projected in a direction established by the riser tube, and
is caused to continue its motion in the general direction so established, while the
products, having lesser momentum, are caused to make an abrupt change of direction,
resulting in an abrupt, substantially instantaneous separation of product from catalyst.
In a preferred embodiment referred to as a vented riser, the riser tube is provided
with a substantially unobstructed discharge opening at its downstream end for discharge
of catalyst. An exit port in the side of the tube adjacent the downstream end receives
the products. The discharge opening communicates with a catalyst flow path which extends
to the usual stripper and regenerator, while the exit port communicates with a product
flow path which is substantially or entirely separated from the catalyst flow path
and leads to separation means for separating the products from the relatively small
portion of catalyst, if any, which manages to gain entry to the product exit port.
Examples of a ballistic separation apparatus and technique as above described, are
found in U. S. Patents 4,066,533 and 4,070,159 to
Myers et al, the disclosures of which patents are hereby incorporated herein by reference
in their entireties. According to a particularly preferred embodiment, based on a
suggestion understood to have emanated from Paul W. Walters, Roger M. Benslay and
Dwight F. Barger, the ballistic separation step includes at least a partial reversal
of direction by the product vapors upon discharge from the riser tube; that is, the
product vapors make a turn or change of direction which exceeds 90° at the riser tube
outlet. This may be accomplished for'example by providing a cup-like member surrounding
the riser tube at its upper end, the ratio of cross-sectional area of the cup-like
member relative to the cross-sectional area of the riser tube outlet being low i.e.
less than 1 and preferably less than about 0.6. Preferably the lip of the cup is slightly
downstream of,or above the downstream end or top of the riser tube, and the cup is
preferably concentric with the riser tube. By means of a product vapor line communicating
with the interior of the cup but not the interior of the riser tube, having its inlet
positioned within the cup interior in a direction upstream of the riser tube outlet,
product vapors emanating from the riser tube and entering the cup by reversal of direction
are transported away from the cup to catalyst and product separation equipment. Such
an arrangement can produce a high degree of completion of the separation of catalyst
from product vapors at the riser tube outlet, so that the required amount of auxiliary
catalyst separation equipment such as cyclones is greatly - reduced, with consequent
large savings in capital investment and operating cost.
[0099] Preferred conditions for operation of the process are described below. Among these
are feed, catalyst and reaction temperatures, reaction and feed pressures, residence
time and levels of conversion, coke production and coke laydown on catalyst.
[0100] In conventional FCC operations with VGO, the feedstock is customarily preheated,
often to temperatures significantly higher than are required to make the feed sufficiently
fluid for pumping and for introduction into the reactor. For example, preheat temperatures
as high as about 700° or 8000F have been reported. But in our process as presently
practiced it is preferred to restrict preheating of the feed, so that the feed is
capable of absorbing a larger amount of heat from the catalyst while the catalyst
raises the feed to conversion temperature, at the same time minimizing utilization
of external fuels to heat the feedstock. Thus, where the nature of the feedstock permits,
it may be fed at ambient temperature. Heavier stocks may be fed at preheat temperatures
of up to about 600°F, typically about 200°F to about 500°F, but higher preheat temperatures
are not necessarily excluded.
[0101] The catalyst fed to the reactor may vary widely in temperature, for example from
about 1100° to about 1600°F, more preferably about 1200° to about 1500°F and most
preferably about 1300° to about 1400°F, with about 1325° to about 1375° being considered
optimum at present.
[0102] As indicated previously, the conversion of the carbo- metallic oil to lower molecular
weight products may be conducted at a temperature of about 900° to about 1400°F, measured
at the reaction chamber outlet. The reaction temperature as measured at said outlet
is more preferably maintained in the range of about 965• to about 1300°F, still more
preferably about 975° to about 1200°F, and most preferably about 980° to about 1150°F.
Depending upon the temperature selected and the properties of the feed, all of the
feed may or may not vaporize in the riser.
[0103] Although the pressure in the reactor may, as indicated above, range from about 10
to about 50 psia, preferred and more preferred pressure ranges are about 15 to about
35 and about 20 to about 35. In general, the partial (or total) pressure of the feed
may be in the range of about 3 to about 30, more preferably about 7 to about 25 and
most preferably about 10 to about 17 psia. The feed partial pressure may be controlled
or suppressed by the introduction of gaseous (including vaporous) materials into the
reactor, such as for instance the steam, water and other additional materials described
above. The process has for example been operated, with the ratio of feed partial pressure
relative to total pressure in the riser in the range of about 0.2 to about 0.8, more
typically about 0.3 to about 0.7 and still more typically about 0.4 to about 0.6,
with the ratio of added gaseous material (which may include recycled gases and/or
steam resulting from introduction of H
20 to the riser in the form of steam and/or liquid water) relative to total pressure
in the riser correspondingly ranging from about 0.8 to about 0.2, more typically about
0.7 to about 0.3 and still more typically about 0.6 to about 0.4. In the illustrative
operations just described, the ratio of the partial pressure of the added gaseous
material relative to the partial pressure of the feed has been in the range of about
0.25 to about 4.0, more typically about 0.4 to about 2.3 and still more typically
about 0.7 to about 1.7.
[0104] Although the residence time of feed and product vapors in the riser may be in the
range of about 0.5 to about 10 seconds, as described above, preferred and more preferred
values are about 0.5 to about 6 and about 1 to about 4 seconds, with about 1.5 to
about 3.0 seconds currently being considered about optimum. For example, the process
has been operated with a riser vapor residence time of about 2.5 seconds or less by
introduction of copious amounts of gaseous materials into the riser, such amounts
being sufficient to provide for example a partial pressure ratio of added gaseous
materials relative to hydrocarbon feed of about 0.8 or more. By way of further illustration,
the process has been operated with said residence time being about two seconds or
less, with the aforesaid ratio being in the range of about 1 to about 2. The combination
of low feed partial pressure, very low residence time and ballistic separation of
products from catalyst are considered especially beneficial for the conversion of
carbo-metallic oils. Additional benefits may be obtained in the foregoing combination
when there is a substantial partial pressure of added gaseous material, especially
H
20 as described above.
[0105] Depending upon whether there is slippage between the catalyst and hydrocarbon vapors
in the riser, the catalyst riser residence time may or may not be the same as that
of the vapors. Thus, the ratio of average catalyst reactor residence time versus vapor
reactor residence time, i.e. slippage, may be in the range of about 1 to about 5,
more preferably about 1 to about 4 and most preferably about 1 to about 3, with about
1 to about 2 currently being considered optimum.
[0106] In practice, there will usually be a small amount of slippage, e.g., at least about
1.05 or 1.2. In an operating unit there may for example be a slippage of about 1.1
at the bottom of the riser and about 1.05 at the top.
[0107] In certain types of known FCC units, there is a riser which discharges catalyst and
product vapors together into an enlarged chamber, usually considered to be part of
the reactor, in which the catalyst is disengaged from product and collected. Continued
contact of catalyst uncracked feed (if any) and cracked products in such enlarged
chamber results in an overall catalyst feed contact time appreciably exceeding the
riser tube residence times of the vapors and catalysts. When practicing the process
of the present invention with ballistic separation of catalyst and vapors at the downstream
(e.g. upper) extremity of the riser, such as is taught in the above mentioned Myers
et al patents, the riser residence time and the catalyst contact time are substantially
the same for a major portion of the feed and product vapors. It is considered advantageous
if the vapor riser residence time and vapor catalyst contact time are substantially
the same for at least about 80%, more preferably at least about 90% and most preferably
at least about 95% by volume of the total feed and product vapors passing through
the riser. By denying such vapors continued contact with catalyst in a catalyst disengagement
and collection chamber one may avoid a tendency toward re-cracking and diminished
selectivity. In general, the comoination or catalyst to oil ratio, temperatures, pressures
and residence times should be such as to effect a substantial conversion of the carbo-
metallic oil feedstock. It is an advantage of the process that very high levels of
conversion can be attained in a single pass; for example the conversion may be in
excess of 50% and may range to about 90% or higher. Preferably, the aforementioned
conditions are maintained at levels sufficient to maintain conversion levels in the
range of about 60 to about 90% and more preferably about 70 to about 35%. The foregoing
conversion levels are calculated by subtracting from 100% the percentage obtained
by dividing the liquid volume of fresh feed into 100 times the volume of liquid product
boiling at and above 430°F (tbp, standard atmospheric pressure).
[0108] These substantial levels of conversion may and usually do result in relatively large
yields of coke, such as for example about 4 to about 14% by weight based on fresh
feed, more commonly about 6 to about 13% and most frequently about 10 to about 13%.
The coke yield can more or less quantitatively deposit upon the catalyst. At contemplated
catalyst to oil ratios, the resultant coke laydown may be in excess of about 0.3,
more commonly in excess of about 0.5 and very frequently in excess of about 1% of
coke by weight, based on the weight of moisture free regenerated catalyst. Such coke
laydown may range as high as about 2%, or about 3%, or even higher.
[0109] In common with conventional FCC operations on VGO, the present process includes stripping
of spent catalyst after disengagement of the catalyst from product vapors. Persons
skilled in the art are acquainted with appropriate stripping agents and conditions
for stripping spent catalyst, but in some cases the present process may require somewhat
more severe conditions than are commonly employed. This may result, for example, from
the use of a carbo-metallic oil having constituents which do not volatilize under
the conditions prevailing in the reactor, which constituents deposit themselves at
least in part on the catalyst. Such adsorbed, unvaporized material can be troublesome
from at least two standpoints. First, if the gases (including vapors) used to strip
the catalyst can gain admission to a catalyst disengagement or collection chamber
connected to the downstream end of the riser, and if there is an accumulation of catalyst
in such chamber, vaporization of these unvaporized hydrocarbons in the stripper can
be followed by adsorption on the bed of catalyst in the chamber. More particularly,
as the catalyst in the stripper is stripped of adsorbed feed material, the resultant
feed material vapors pass through the bed of catalyst accumulated in the catalyst
collection and/or disengagement chamber and may deposit coke and/or condensed material
on the catalyst in said bed. As the catalyst bearing such deposits moves from the
bed and into the stripper and from thence to the regenerator, the condensed products
can create a demand for more stripping capacity, while the coke can tend to increase
regeneration temperatures and/or demand greater regeneration capacity. For the foregoing
reasons, it is preferred to prevent or restrict contact between stripping vapors and
catalyst accumulations in the catalyst disengagement or collection chamber. This may
be done for example by preventing such accumulations from forming, e.g. with the exception'of
a quantity of catalyst which essentially drops out of circulation and may remain at
the bottom of the disengagement and/or collection chamber, the catalyst that is in
circulation may be removed from said chamber promptly upon settling to the bottom
of the chamber. Also, to minimize regeneration temperatures and demand for regeneration
capacity, it may be desirable to employ conditions of time, temperature and atmosphere
in the stripper which are sufficient to reduce potentially volatile hydrocarbon material
borne by the stripped catalyst to about 10% or less by weight of the total carbon
loading on the catalyst. Such stripping may for example include reheating of the catalyst,
extensive stripping with steam, the use of gases having a temperature considered higher
than normal for FCC/VGO operations, such as for instance flue gas from the regenerator,
as well as other refinery stream gases such as hydro- treater off-gas (H
2S containing), hydrogen and others. For example, the stripper may be operated at a
temperature- of about 350°F using steam at a pressure of about 150 psig and a weight
ratio of steam to catalyst of about 0.002 to about 0.003. On the other hand, the stripper
may be operated at a temperature of about 1025°F or higher.
[0110] Substantial conversion of carbo-metallic oils to lighter products in accordance with
the invention tends to produce sufficiently large coke yields and coke laydown on
catalyst to require some care in catalyst regeneration. In order to maintain adequate
activity in zeolite and non-zeolite catalysts, it is desirable to regenerate the catalyst
under conditions of time, temperature and atmosphere sufficient to reduce the percent
by weight of carbon remaining on the catalyst to about 0.25% or less. The amounts
of coke which must therefore be burned off of the catalysts when processing carbo-metallic
oils are usually substantially greater than would be the case when cracking VGO. The
term coke when used to describe the present invention, should be understood to include
any residual unvaporized feed or cracking product, if any such material is present
on the catalyst after stripping.
[0111] Regeneration of catalyst, burning away of coke deposited on the catalyst during the
conversion of the feed, may be performed at any suitable temperature in the range
of about 1100° to about 1600°F, measured at the regenerator catalyst outlet. This
temperature is preferably in the range of about 1200° to about 1500°F, more preferably
about 1275° to about 1425°F and optimally about 1325° to ' about 1375°F. The process
has been operated, for example, with a fluidized regenerator with the temperature
of the catalyst dense phase in the range of about 1300° to about 1400°F.
[0112] In accordance with the invention, regeneration is conducted while maintaining the
catalyst in one or more fluidized beds in one or more fluidization chambers. Such
fluidized bed operations are characterized, for instance, by one or more fluidized
dense beds of ebulliating particles having a bed density of, for example, about 25
to about 50 pounds per cubic foot. Fluidization is maintained bypassing gases, including
combustion supporting gases, through the bed at a sufficient velocity to maintain
the particles in a fluidized state but at a velocity which is sufficiently small to
prevent substantial entrainment of particles in the gases. For example, the lineal
velocity of the fluidizing gases may be in the range of about 0.2 to about 4 feet
per second and preferably about 0.2 to about 3 feet per second. The average total
residence time of the particles in the one or more beds is substantial, ranging for
example from about 5 to about 30, more preferably about 5 to about 20 and still more
preferably about 5 to about 10 minutes.
[0113] Heat released by combustion of coke in the regenerator is absorbed by the catalyst
and can be readily retained thereby until the regenerated catalyst is brought into
contact with fresh feed. When processing carbo-metallic oils to the relatively high
levels of conversion involved in the present invention, the amount of regenerator
heat which is transmitted to fresh feed by way of recycling regenerated catalyst can
substantially exceed the level of heat input which is appropriate in the riser for
heating and vaporizing the feed and other materials, for supplying the endothermic
heat of reaction for cracking, for making up the heat losses of the unit and so forth.
Thus, the amount of regenerator heat transmitted to fresh feed may be controlled,
or restricted where necessary, within certain approximate ranges. The amount of heat
so transmitted may for example be in the range of about 500 to about 1200, more particularly
about 600 to about 900, and more particularly about 650 to about 850 BTUs per pound
of fresh feed. The aforesaid ranges refer to the combined heat, in BTUs per pound
of fresh feed, which is transmitted by the catalyst to the feed and reaction products
(between the contacting of feed with catalyst and the separation of product from catalyst)
for supplying the heat of reaction (e.g. for cracking) and the difference in enthalpy
between the products and the fresh feed. Not included in the foregoing are the heat
made available in the reactor by the adsorption of coke on the catalyst, nor the heat
consumed by heating, vaporizing or reacting recycle streams and such added materials
as water, steam naphtha and other hydrogen donors, flue gases and inert gases, or
by radiation and other losses.
[0114] One or a combination of techniques may be utilized for controlling or restricting
the amount of regeneration heat transmitted via catalyst to fresh feed. For example,
one may add a combustion modifier to the cracking catalyst in order to reduce the
temperature of combustion of coke to carbon dioxide and/or carbon monoxide in the
regenerator. Moreover, one may remove heat from the catalyst through heat exchange
means, including for example heat exchangers (e.g. steam coils) built into the regenerator
itself, whereby one may extract heat from the catalyst during regeneration. Heat exchangers
can be built into catalyst transfer lines, such as for instance the catalyst return
line from the regenerator to the reactor, whereby heat may be removed from the catalyst
after it is regenerated. The amount of heat imparted to the catalyst in the regenerator
may be restricted by reducing the amount of insulation on the regenerator to permit
some heat loss to the surrounding atmosphere, especially if feeds of exceedingly high
coking potential are planned for processing; in general, such loss of heat to the
atmosphere is considered economically less desirable than certain of the other alternatives
set forth herein. One may also inject cooling fluids into portions of the regenerator
other than those occupied by the dense bed, for example water and/or steam, whereby
the amount of inert gas available in the regenerator for heat absorption and removal
is increased.
[0115] Another suitable and preferred technique for controlling or restricting the heat
transmitted to fresh feed via recycled regenerated catalyst involves maintaining a
specified ratio between the carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide formed in the regenerator
while such gases are in heat exchange contact or relationship with catalyst undergoing
regeneration.
[0116] Still another particularly preferred technique for controlling or restricting the
regeneration heat imparted to fresh feed via recycled catalyst involves the diversion
of a portion of the heat borne by recycled catalyst to added materials introduced
into the reactor, such as the water, steam, naphtha, other hydrogen donors, flue gases,
inert gases, and other gaseous or vaporizable materials which may be introduced into
the reactor.
[0117] In most circumstances, it will be important to insure that no adsorbed oxygen containing
gases are carried into the riser by recycled catalyst. Thus, whenever such action
is considered necessary, the catalyst discharged from the regenerator may be stripped
with appropriate stripping gases to remove oxyaen containing gases. Such stripping
may for instance be conducted at relatively high temperatures, for example about 1350°
to about 1370°F, using steam, nitrogen or other inert gas as the stripping gas(es).
The use of nitrogen and other inert gases is beneficial from the standpoint of avoiding
a tendency toward hydro-thermal catalyst deactivation which may result from the use
of steam.
[0118] The following comments and discussion relating to metals management, carbon management
and heat management may be of assistance in obtaining best results when operating
the invention. Since these remarks are for the most part directed to what is considered
the best mode of operation, it should be apparent that the invention is not limited
to the particular modes of operation discussed below. Moreover, since certain of these
comments are necessarily based on theoretical considerations, there is no intention
to be bound by any such theory, whether expressed herein or implicit in the operating
suggestions set forth hereinafter.
[0119] Although discussed separately below, it is readily apparent that metals management,
carbon management and heat management are inter-related and interdependent subjects
both in theory and practice. While coke yield and coke laydown on catalyst are primarily
the result of the relatively large Quantities of coke precursors found in carbo-metallic
oils, the production of coke is exacerbated by high metals accumulations, which can
also significantly affect catalyst performance. Moreover, the degree of success experienced
in metals management and carbon management will have a direct influence on the extent
to which heat management is necessary. Moreover, some of the steps taken in support-of
metals management have proved very helpful in respect to carbon and heat management.
[0120] As noted previously the presence of a large'heavy metals accumulation on the catalyst
tends to aggravate the problem of dehydrogenation and aromatic condensation, resulting
in increased production of gases and coke for a feedstock of a given Ramsbottom carbon
value. The introduction of substantial quantities of H
2O into the reactor, either in the form of steam or liquid water, appears highly beneficial
from the standpoint of keeping the heavy metals in a less harmful form, i.e. the oxide
rather than metallic form. This is of assistance in maintaining the desired selectivity.
[0121] Also,, a unit design in which system components and residence times are selected
to reduce the ratio of catalyst reactor residence time relative to catalyst regenerator
residence time will tend to reduce the ratio of the times during which the catalyst
is respectively under reduction conditions and oxidation conditions. This too can
assist in maintaining desired levels of selectivity.
[0122] Whether the metals content of the catalyst is being managed successfully may be observed
by monitoring the total hydrogen plus methane produced in the reactor and/or the ratio
of hydrogen to methane thus produced. In general, it is considered that the hydrogen
to methane mole ratio should be less than about 1 and preferably about 0.6 or less,
with about 0.4 or less being considered about optimum. In actual practice the hydrogen
to methane ratio may range from about 0.5 to about 1.5 and average about 0.8 to about
1.
[0123] Careful carbon management can improve both selectivity (the ability to maximize production
of valuable products), and heat productivity. In general, the techniques of metals
control described above are also of assistance in carbon management. The usefulness
of water addition in respect to carbon management has already been spelled out in
considerable detail in that part of the specification which relates to added materials
for introduction into the reaction znne. In general, those techniques which improve
dispersion of the feed in the reaction zone should also prove helpful, these include
for instance the use of fogging or misting devices to assist in dispersing the feed.
[0124] Catalyst to oil ratio is also a factor in heat management. In common with prior FCC
practice on VGO, the reactor temperature may be controlled in the practice of the
present invention by respectively increasing or decreasing the flow of hot regenerated
catalyst to the reactor in response to decreases and increases in reactor temperature,
typically the outlet temperature in the case of a riser type reactor. Where the automatic
controller for catalyst introduction is set to maintain an excessive catalyst to oil
ratio, one can expect unnecessarily large rates of carbon production and heat release,
relative to the weight of fresh feed charged to the reaction zone.
[0125] Relatively high reactor temperatures are also beneficial from the standpoint of carbon
management. Such higher temperatures faster more complete vaporization of feed and
disengagement of product from catalyst.
[0126] Carbon management can also be facilitated by suitable restriction of the total pressure
in the reactor and the partial pressure of the feed. In general, at a given level
of conversion, relatively small decreases in the aforementioned pressures can substantially
reduce coke production. This may be due to the fact that restricting total pressure
tends to enhance vaporization of high boiling components of the feed, encourage cracking
and facilitate disengagement of both unconverted feed and higher boiling cracked products
from the catalyst. It may be of assistance in this regard to restrict the pressure
drop of equipment downstream of and in communication with the reactor. But if it is
desired or necessary to operate the system at hicher total pressure, such as for instance
because of operating limitations (e.g. pressure drop in downstream equipment) the
above described benefits may be obtained by restrictinq the feed partial pressure.
Suitable ranges for total reactor pressure and feed partial pressure have been set
forth above, and in general it is desirable to attempt to minimize the pressures within
these ranges.
[0127] The abrupt separation of catalyst from product vapors and unconverted feed (if any)
is also of great assistance. It is for this reason that the so-called vented riser
apparatus and technique disclosed in U.S. Patents 4,070,159 and 4,066,533 to George
D. Myers et al is the preferred type of apparatus for conducting this process. For
similar reasons, it is beneficial to reduce insofar as possible the elapsed time between
separation of catalyst from product vapors and the commencement of stripping. The
vented riser and prompt stripping tend to reduce the opportunity for coking of unconverted
feed and higher boiling cracked products adsorbed on the catalyst.
[0128] A particularly desirable mode of operation from the standpoint of carbon management
is to operate the process in the vented riser using a hydrogen donor if necessary,
while maintaining the feed partial pressure and total reactor pressure as low as possible,
and incorporating relatively large amounts of water, steam and if desired, other diluents,
which provide the numerous benefits discussed in greater detail above. Moreover, when
liquid water, steam, hydrogen donors, hydrogen and other gaseous or vaporizable materials
are fed to the reaction zone, the feeding of these materials provides an opportunity
for exercising additional cc.itrol over catalyst to oil ratio. Thus, for example,
the practice of increasing or decreasing the catalyst to oil ratio for a given amount
of decrease or increase in-reactor temperature may be reduced or eliminated by substituting
either appropriate reduction or increase in the charging ratios of the water, steam
and other gaseous or vaporizable material, or an appropriate reduction or increase
in the ratio of water to steam and/or other aaseous materials introduced into the
reaction zone.
[0129] Heat management includes measures taken to control the amount of heat released in
various parts of the process and/or for dealing successfully with such heat as may
be released. Unlike conventional FCC practice using VGO, wherein it is usually a problem
to generate sufficient heat during regeneration to heat balance the reactor, the processing
of carbo- metallic oils generally produces so much heat as to require careful management
thereof.
[0130] Heat management can be facilitated by various techniques associated with the materials
introduced into the reactor. Thus, heat absorption by feed can be maximized by minimum
preheating of feed, it being necessary only that the feed temperature be high enough
so that it is sufficiently fluid for successful pumping and dispersion in the reactor.
When the catalyst is maintained in a highly active state with the suppression of coking
(metals control), so as to achieve higher conversion, the resultant higher conversion
and greater selectivity can increase the heat absorption of the reaction. In general,
higher reactor temperatures promote catalyst conversion activity in the face of more
refractory and higher boiling constituents with high coking potentials. While the
rate of catalyst deactivation may thus be increased, the higher temperature of operation
tends to offset this loss in activity. Higher temperatures in the reactor also contribute
to enhancement of octane number, thus offsetting the octane depressant effect of high
carbon lay down Other techniques for absorbing heat have also been discussed above
in connection with the introduction of water, steam, and other gaseous or vaporizable
materials into the reactor.
[0131] As noted above, the invention can be practised in the above-described mode and in
many others. An illustrative, nonlimiting example is described by the accompanying
schematic diagrams in the figures and by the description of these figures which follows.
[0132] Referring in detail to the drawings, in Fig. 1 petroleum feedstock is introduced
into the lower end of riser reactor 2 through inlet line 1 at which point it is mixed
with hot regenerated catalyst coming from regenerator 9 through line 3.
[0133] The feedstock is catalytically cracked in passing up riser 2 and the product vapors
are separated from spent catalyst in vessel 8. The catalyst particles move upwardly
from riser 2 into the space within vessel 8 and fall downwardly into dense bed 16.
The cracking products together with some catalyst fines pass through horizontal line
4 into cyclone 5. The gases are separated from the catalyst and pass out through line
6. The catalyst fines drop into bed 16 through dipleg 19.
[0134] The spent catalyst, coated with coke and vanadium in a reduced state, passes through
line 7 into upper dense fluidized bed 18 within regenerator 9. The spent catalyst
is fluidized with a mixture of air, CO and C0
2 passing through porous plate 21 from lower zone 20. The spent catalyst is partially
regenerated in bed 18 and is passed into the lower portion of vented riser 13 through
line 11. Air is introduced into riser 13 through line 12 where it is mixed with partially
regenerated catalyst. The catalyst is forced rapidly upwards through the riser and
it falls into dense settled bed 17. Line 14 provides a source of reducing gas such
as CO for bed 17 to keep the regenerated catalyst in a reducing atmosphere and thus
keep vanadium present in a reduced oxidation state.
[0135] Regenerated catalyst is returned to the riser reactor 2 through line 3, which is
provided with a source of a reducing gas such as CO through line 22. '
[0136] In Fig. 2, spent catalyst coated with coke and vanadium in a reduced state flows
into dense fluidized bed 32 of regenerator 31 through inlet line 33. Air to combust
the coke and fluidize the catalyst is introduced through line 34 into air distributor
35. Coke is burned and passes upwardly into riser regenerator 36. The partially regenerated
catalyst which reaches the riser 35 is contacted with air from line 37 which completes
the regeneration. The regenerated catalyst passes upwardly from the top of the riser
36 and falls down into dense settled bed 37. Dense bed 37 and the zone above 37 through
which the regenerated catalyst falls are supplied with a reducing gas such as CO through
lines 40 and 41. The regenerated catalyst is returned to the cracking reactor through
line 38. The CO- rich flue gases leave the regenerator through line 39.
[0137] Having thus described this invention, the following Example is offered to illustrate
it in more detail.
Example
[0138] A carbo-metallic feed at a temperature of about 400°F is fed at a rate of about 2000
pounds per hour into the bottom of a vented riser reactor where it is mixed with a
zeolite catalyst at a temperature of about 1275°F and a catalyst to oil ratio by weight
of about 11.
[0139] The carbo-metallic feed has a heavy metal content of about 5 ppm Nickel Equivalents,
including 3 ppm vanadium, and has a Conradson carbon content of about 7 percent. About
85 percent of the feed boils above 650°F and about 20 percent of the feed boils above
1025°F.
[0140] The temperature within the reactor is about 1000°F and the pressure is about 27 psia.
About 75 percent of the feed is converted to fractions boiling at a temperature less
than 430°F and about 53 percent of the feed is converted to gasoline. During the conversion,
about 11 percent of the feed is converted to coke.
[0141] The catalyst containing about one percent by weight of coke contains about 20,000
ppm Nickel Equivalents including about 12,000 ppm vanadium. The catalyst is stripped
with steam at a temperature of about 1000°F to remove volatiles and the stripped catalyst
is introduced into the upper zone of the regenerator as shown in Fig. 1 at a rate
of about 23,000 pounds per hour, and is partially regenerated to a coke concentration
of about 0.2 percent by a mixture of air, CO and C0
2. The CO/C0
2 ratio in the fluidized bed in the upper zone is about 0.3.
[0142] The partially regenerated catalyst is passed to the bottom of a riser reactor where
it is contacted with air in an amount sufficient to force the catalyst up the riser
with a residence time of about second. The regenerated catalyst, having a coke loading
of about 0.05 percent exits from the top of the riser and falls into a dense bed having
a reducing atmosphere comprising CO. The regenerated catalyst is recycled to the riser
reactor for contact with additional feed.