[0001] The present invention resides in electrolytic cells having iron-containing materials
exposed to the interior portions of the cell and maintained at about the same voltage
as that of the cathode.
[0002] Electrolytic cells have found wide uses in modern industrial practice. However, with
energy costs increasing, researchers in recent years have investigated means to reduce
the energy consumed by electrolytic cells, following numerous approaches. Among the
more common techniques used are the modification of the electrodes. For example, low
overvoltage cathodes have been used; such cathodes have been described in numerous
patents; among which are U.S. Patents 2,419,231; 3,272,728; 4,104,133; 4,170,536;
4,162,204; 4,024,044; 3,945,907 and 3,974,058.
[0003] Japanese Patent 31-6611, published August 7, 1956, discloses a nickel/zinc alloy
being electroplated onto a nickel-coated, iron substrate, wherein the zinc is subsequently
leached from the Ni/Zn alloy by an alkaline solution. A similar process is shown in
Netherlands Patent 75-07550, laid open to inspection January 20, 1976.
[0004] Accordingly, the present invention resides in- an electrolytic cell wherein voltage
and pH conditions place iron-containing components of the cell into a state of ionization
causing deterioration of the components, said cell comprising an anode in an anode
chamber; a cathode in a cathode chamber; said iron-containing components being exposed
to the interior portion of the cathode chamber and electrically connected to the cathode;
and wherein at least a portion of the surface of the iron-containing components is
coated with a protective coating at a level sufficient to minimize ionization of iron
to thereby prevent contamination of the products by electrolysis.
[0005] The Figure is a Pourbaix diagram showing the potential vs pH for an iron-water system
at 25°C.
[0006] The Figure shows the oxidation state of iron as a function of pH and voltage at 25°C
in an iron--water system. If the iron-containing parts of the cell exposed to pH and
voltage conditions which put them into area A of the Pourbaix diagram, iron will exist
as Fe. Conditions corresponding to area B, will cause iron to exist as HFeO
2-. In area
C, iron will exist as a mixture of Fe 0 and HFeO
2-. In area D, iron will exist as Fe
30
4 while in area E, iron will exist as Fe
20
3. pH and voltage conditions corresponding to areas A, D and E will cause iron to exist
in a solid state. However, if iron-containing parts are subjected to pH and voltage
conditions corresponding to areas B or C, iron will ionize and cause iron impurities
in the electrolytic products.
[0007] Although voltage reduction techniques are economical, in that they save energy, it
has been discovered that there are problems associated with such techniques. One of
the more serious problems is the fact that frequently the electrolytic products contain
a greater amount of impurities than do products produced from conventional cells.
For example, when low overvoltage cathodes are used in a chlor-alkali electrolytic
process, it has been found that the caustic produced frequently contains a greater
concentration of iron than caustic produced from cells using conventional cathodes.
Since low overvoltage cathodes are typically coated with nickel or some other corrosion-resistant
metal coating, it is surprising that the iron contamination in such a cell is greater
than when conventional iron or steel cathodes are used.
[0008] It has been found that the iron contamination, present in the products produced by
electrolysis when a low cathode voltage is used, comes from iron-containing cell parts
which are exposed to the interior portions of the cell and are maintained at about
the same voltage as the cathode. An example of a source of iron contamination is a
backscreen or some other type of cathode support that is frequently used in electrolytic
cells. It has been found that if at least a portion of the iron-containing metallic
parts of an electrolytic cell which are exposed to the interior portions of the cell
are at least partially covered with a protective coating, iron contamination in the
electrolytic products is minimized.
[0009] The protective coating used to coat the iron-containing parts of the cell should
be stable at the applied electrical voltage, substantially stable at the temperature
of the cell, substantially unreactive with the catholyte, and substantially stable
at the pH.
[0010] Examples of some coatings which may be used are nickel, titanium, vinyl ester resins,
epoxy and various other plastics. Nickel, however, is the preferred coating since
it conforms nicely to the physical and chemical requirements of the coating.
[0011] Optionally, the backscreen or other iron-containing parts of the cell may be constructed
from the materials which have been listed as being good protective coatings. For example,
the backscreen may be a nickel screen, rather than a nickel-coated iron screen.
[0012] When conventional iron or steel cathodes are used in an electrolytic cell for the
electrolysis of water or a brine solution, the cathode is normally maintained at a
voltage of approximately -1.1 to -1.2 volts vs. Normal Hydrogen Electrode (N.H.E.).
The pH range is normally above approximately 13. These conditions would place iron-containing
parts of_the cell into area A of the Figure. Any iron present on the cathode or any
other iron in the cell which is maintained at a similar voltage will not ionize but
will exist as Fe. However, if the voltage is reduced so that the cathode operates
at approximately -0.8 volt to approximately -1.1 volts vs. N.H.E., the cell conditions
enter areas B and/or C of the Figure where HFeO
2 will form and iron will ionize. Ionization of the iron-containing parts will cause
iron contamination of the products of the cell.
[0013] The invention may be used in any electrolytic cell wherein a voltage and pH conditions
place iron-containing parts of the cell under conditions where iron will ionize. In
such a system, any iron-containing parts which are electrically connected with the
cathode, or maintained at a voltage about the same as the cathode, will cause iron
to ionize and will contaminate the products of the electrolysis. The invention may
be used to minimize iron contamination of the products.
[0014] It should be understood that the Pourbaix diagram which was-
gelected for illustration of the invention is for 25°C in an aqueous system which is
chloride free. However, most electrolytic cells operate at elevated temperatures.
For example, chlor-alkali cells normally operate at 50-100°C. The voltage required
to ionize iron under given pH ranges will vary with temperature, thus, while iron
will ionize at voltages of about -0.8 to -1.1 volts vs. N.H.E. at 25°C, the voltage
to cause ionization at 100°C in chloride-containing systems will be slightly different.
[0015] The following examples illustrate the invention in a chlor-alkali electrolytic cell.
However, it should be well understood that the invention may be used in any electrolytic
cell wherein an aqueous solution is electrolyzed and wherein there are iron-containing
parts electrically connected with the cathode or parts which are maintained at a voltage
about the same as that of the cathode.
Example
[0016] Four 11 square foot cathodes were tested in diaphragm chlor-alkali cells: One conventional
low- carbon steel cathode having an uncoated backscreen; one low overvoltage cathode
having an uncoated backscreen; and two low overvoltage cathodes, each having a backscreen
coated with a protective nickel coating. The protective coating was applied by electroplating
a steel cathode with a nickel-zinc alloy, then removing the zinc by soaking in an
alkaline solution, leaving a high-surface area nickel coating.
[0017] Each of the cells was fed a saturated NaCl brine solution and was maintained at a
temperature of about 70°C. The same brine source fed all cells, thus the brine for
each cell had the same iron content. Upon start-up, each of the cells was operated
at approximately 800 amps and produced an approximately 10 weight percent NaOH catholyte
solution. The conventional steel cathode cell produced a catholyte having 1.7 ppm
Fe. The low overvoltage cathode having an uncoated backscreen produced a catholyte
having 1.6 ppm Fe. However, the two low overvoltage cathodes having a nickel coated
backscreen produced catholytes having 0.7 and 0.5 ppm Fe, respectively.
[0018] After operating several weeks at 800 amps, the current on each cell was lowered to
150 amps, thus reducing the cathode overvoltage. At 150 amps, the standard steel cathode
cell produced a catholyte having 0.2 ppm Fe; the low overvoltage cathode having an
uncoated backscreen produced a catholyte having 0.4 ppm Fe; and the two low overvoltage
cathodes having nickel coated backscreens each produced catholytes having 0.06 ppm
Fe.
[0019] The four cells were then shut down for a few days and restarted. Upon start-up, the
standard steel cathode cell produced a catholyte having 1.7 ppm Fe; the low overvoltage
cathode cell having an uncoated backscreen produced a catholyte having 2.4 ppm Fe;
and each of the two low overvoltage cathode cells having a coated backscreen produced
catholytes having 0.5 ppm Fe.
1. An electrolytic cell wherein voltage and pH conditions place iron-containing components
of the cell into a state of ionization causing deterioration of the components, said
cell comprising an anode in an anode chamber; a cathode in a cathode chamber; said
iron-containing components being exposed to the interior portion of the cathode chamber
and electrically connected to the cathode; and wherein at least a portion of the surface
of the iron-containing components is coated with a protective coating at a level sufficient
to minimize ionization of iron to thereby prevent contamination of the products by
electrolysis.
2. The cell of Claim 1 wherein the protective coating is a metal selected from nickel
or titanium or an alloy of said metals.
3. The cell of Claims 1 or 2, including means for impressing a sufficient voltage
on the anode and the cathode to cause electrolytic reactions to occur; wherein said
voltage maintains the iron containing components at a voltage level about the same
as the voltage of the cathode.
4. The cell of Claim 3 wherein the cathode is maintained at a voltage of from -0.8
to -1.1 volts, vs. Normal Hydrogen Electrode.
5. The cell of Claim 3 or 4 wherein the means for maintaining the iron-containing
materials at a voltage approximately the same as that of the cathode is an electrical
connection between the cathode and the iron-containing materials.
6. The cell of any one of the preceding claims, wherein the cathode is a low-overvoltage
cathode.