[0001] This invention concerns the reclamation of foundry sands.
[0002] Foundry sand is used with suitable binding agents for making moulds and cores for
casting metal. Various binders, both inorganic and organic, are used to bond the foundry
sand and, for many years, the sand after use was discarded.
[0003] In an attempt to reduce the running costs of foundries and to reduce environmental
pollution, various processes have been suggested in an attempt to enable the foundry
to re-use sand, preferably many times over. Problems have always arisen in that the
amount of binder to be removed from the used foundry sand to enable it to be re-used
is quite critical and, hitherto, it has only been possible to use again some reclaimed
sand together with some fresh sand if satisfactory binding is to be achieved and suitable
moulds and cores made.
[0004] A paper entitled "Trends in Sand Reclamation" was given at the British Cast Iron
Research Association International Conference in 1979, by Mr. D. A. Taylor and in
this paper reference is made to water washing and attrition, which can be carried
out by various means including crusher units, vibrators, pneumatic impellers and shot
blasting. For organic binders incineration has also been proposed. In relation to
silicate bonded sands, it is suggested that only intensive attrition and/or water
washing can remove sufficient sodium oxide to allow re-use of the sand.
[0005] British Patent Specification No. 1,322,864 is also concerned with the problem of
sand reclamation and discloses a process in which the used foundry sand is introduced
into a blast of fluid under pressure, whereby the sand is projected against lateral
walls of a hermetically sealed casing to cause a matrix of the binding agent to burst
releasing the sand. The product of this process is then subjected to granulometric
selection to remove the fines generated by the high impact.
[0006] British Patent Specification No. 1,505,904 discloses a process in which coated sand
particles are projected in a current of gas against the interior surface of a rotating
drum.
[0007] British Patent Specification No. 2,019,274 discloses a similar process in which,
again, the coated sand is projected against a. solid target.
[0008] Other reclamation methods have been disclosed in, for example, British Patent Specification
No. 1,593,008, in which used foundry sand is suspended in a fluidised bed and subjected
to jets of compressed air whilst in the fluidised state. Japanese Patent Specification
No. 51109941, published on 3 April 1978, concerns a similar method in which fluidised
sand is subjected to abrasion by stirrer blades rotated at high speed inside the fluidised
bed of sand.
[0009] US Patent No 2 478 461 also discloses a process for the removal of binder from foundry
sand, but appears to be mainly concerned with binders which generate a carbonaceous
residue. It is suggested that this residue can be burned and the partially cleaned
sand further cleaned by subjecting high velocity sand grains issuing from nozzles
to severe erosive action and further suggests the provision of an abrasive-resistant
lining (18). This specification, like other referred to earlier in which targets are
specified, may well introduce contaminants from the target into the sand.
[0010] The essential problem to be overcome in the sand reclamation process is an adequate
balancing of two objectives, namely the effective removal of a hard and tenacious
coating and the avoidance of significant particle degradation of the clean sand particles
to produce fines which are not useful in the reclaimed sand. The present invention
provides a process which effectively balances these two objectives.
[0011] Experiments have shown that it is acceptable to have up to a total of 0.8% by weight
of soda on sand, including the fresh silicate binder, when reclaimed sand is reused
in foundry core work, without having to add fresh uncontaminated sand to the core
mixture. This is equivalent to the removal of 65-70% of the soda coated onto the sand
in the normal carbon dioxide or ester silicate processes.
[0012] If less soda is removed a proportion of fresh sand needs to be included to ensure
the production of satisfactory cores and moulds. Such removal can be obtained when
organic binders are removed from' foundry sand by attrition or incineration, but no
satisfactory method has hitherto been proposed for the removal of silicate binder
to this extent, without causing significant disintegration of the sand, so producing
useless fines which merely contaminate the system.
[0013] Experiments involving increased fluid energy input into a fluidised bed system have
proved unsatisfactory in that the additional energy destabilises the fluidised bed
container carrying the fluidised bed.
[0014] Accordingly, the present invention provides a process for the reclamation of silicate
binder coated foundry sand, in which the coated foundry sand is subjected to a fluid
energy acceleration to remove the binder and the reclaimed sand is separated from
the binder debris, characterised in that the fluid energy is imparted to the sand
in a fluid energy mill to a sufficient extent to substantially remove the binder coating
without causing significant disintegration of the sand particles and in which the
energy imparted to the sand is less than 1,300 kilojoules per kilogramme of coated
sand and in which the Reynolds Number arising from the energy-imparting jet stream
does not exceed 6.5x10
4.
[0015] In the equipment used for this work, the optimal energy range was from 400 to 1,200
kilojoules per kilogramme of sand. This work was carried out in a microniser having
a diameter of 10 cm and containing six 1.6 mm diameter inlet nozzles in the periphery
of the chamber. The feed rate of the sand varied from 0.33 to 1.54 per second and
the optimum feed rate was of the order of 1 g per second for this apparatus.
[0016] Using a commercial production size of fluid energy mill-or microniser the sand feed
rate can be increased in relation to the size of the mill and air throughput. The
specific energy imparted to the sand should be of the same order of magnitude as previously
defined but applied at a commercially useful sand feed rate.
[0017] Fluid energy or jet mills (alternatively known as Micronisers) suitable for use in
the process of this invention are available from various suppliers in the market and
are described in, for example, Chemical Engineering Handbook, Ed. J. H. Perry, 4th
ed., McGraw Hill, p. 8-42 and 43. Such mills consist essentially of a chamber in which
the contaminated sand is acted upon by a number of gaseous fluid jets issuing through
orifices spaced around the periphery of the substantially circular chamber.
[0018] The fluid energy imparted to the sand in the mill is determined by calculating the
energy expended by the adiabatic expansion of the compressed fluid through the nozzles,
and is given by:

where
E=Energy due to expansion (kw)
R=Universal Gas Constant (8.314 kJ/k mol °K)
T=Absolute Temperature (°K)
W=molal flowrate (k mol/s)
P1-=Absolute air pressure applied to nozzles (N/m2)
Po=Absolute air pressure after expansion (N/m2) assumed to be atmospheric pressure y=ratio of specific heats (CP/CR).
[0019] The specific energy input is obtained by dividing by the feedrate of sand (kg/s),
i.e.

[0020] It will be appreciated that the imparted energy figures set out above relate to a
specific piece of apparatus, but it is thought that by simple experiment the work
can readily be applied to other types of fluid' energy mill. To assist in this generalisation
and to relate the forces involved to the fluid input stream, Reynolds Number calculations
have been carried out.
[0021] Reynolds Number is the ratio of inertial force to the viscous force of the flowing
fluid. It is a measure of the air fluid velocity in the jet stream which determines
the drag force exerted on the individual particles and thus determines their acceleration
and their impact velocity. Reynolds Number can be calculated on the basis of the fluid
mass flowrate through a single nozzle (Q
f) of nozzle diameter, d
",

viscosity
[0022] In general, it is preferred that the Reynolds Number is in the range 4.Ox10
4 to 6.4x10
4.
[0023] Using the 10 cm diameter microniser referred to earlier, a sample of foundry sand
which had previously been used in a silicate bonded core was treated in accordance
with the invention and the results are set out below.
[0024] Sieve analysis of original fresh uncoated sand

[0025] It can be seen from the Examples that in the preferred range of specific energy and
Reynolds number mode of operation of the process of this invention, that more than
60% of the soda on used sand can be removed whilst fines are less than 15%.
[0026] If higher energies are used, although even more soda is removed, unacceptably large
quantities of fines are produced-see Exp. 1.
[0027] As mentioned earlier, if sufficient soda is removed, sand can be reused without any
addition of fresh sand, so giving a valuable benefit to the user.
1. A process for the reclamation of silicate binder coated foundry sand, in which
the coated foundry sand is subjected to a fluid energy acceleration to remove the
binder and the reclaimed sand is separated from the binder debris, characterised in
that the fluid energy is imparted to the sand in a fluid energy mill to a sufficient
extent to substantially remove the binder coating without causing significant disintegration
of the sand particles and in which the energy imparted to the sand is less than 1,300
kilojoules per kilogramme of coated sand and in which the Reynolds Number arising
from the energy-imparting jet stream does not exceed 6.5x104.
2. A process as claimed in claim 1, in which the energy imparted is in the range 400
to 1,200 kilojoules per kilogramme of sand and in which the Reynolds Number is in
the range 4x104 to 6.4 to 104.
3. A process as claimed in any one of the preceding claims, in which the reclaimed
sand is separated from the binder debris in a separate classification system.
1. Verfahren zur Rückgewinnung von mit Silicatbindemittel überzogenen Gießereisanden,
wobei der überzogene Gießereisand einer Strömungsbeschleunigung unterworfen wird,
um das Bindemittel zu entfernen und der rückgewonnene Sand von den Bindemittelrückständen
getrennt wird, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß die Strömungsenergie dem Sand in einer
Strahlmühle in einem genügenden Ausmaß mitgeteilt wird, daß der Bindemittelüberzug
im wesentlichen entfernt wird ohne wesentliche Zertrümmerung der Sandteilchen, wobei
die dem Sand mitgeteilte Energie geringer als 1.300 Kilojoule je Kilogramm von überzogenem
Sand beträgt und die Reynolds-Zahl aus dem energievermittelnden Strahlungstrom 6,5x104 nicht überschreitet.
2. Verfahren gemäß Anspruch 1, worin die mitgeteilte Energie im Bereich von 400 bis
1.200 Kilojoule je Kilogramm Sand beträgt und die Reynolds-Zahl im Bereich von 4×104 bis 6,4x104 liegt.
3. Verfahren gemäß einem der vorgehenden Ansprüche, worin der wiedergewonnene Sand
von den Bindemittelrückständen in einem getrennten Klassiersystem getrennt wird.
1. Procédé pour la récupération de sable de fonderie enrobé de liant au silicate,
dans lequel le sable de fonderie est soumis à une accélération par énergie fluide
pour éliminer le liant et le sable récupéré est séparé des débris de liant, caractérisé
en ce que l'énergie fluide est communiquée au sable dans un désintégrateur à jet d'air
jusqu'à un degré suffisant pour éliminer sensiblement tout l'enrobage de liant sans
causer de désintégration significative des particules de sable et dans lequel l'énergie
communiquée au sable est inférieure à 1,300 kilojoules par kilogramme de sable enrobé
et dans lequel le nombre de Reynolds découlant du courant du jet communiquant l'énergie
ne dépasse pas 6,5×104.
2. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel l'énergie communiquée est de 400
à 1,200 kilojoules par kilogramme de sable et dans lequel le nombre de Reynolds est
de 4x104 à 6,4x104.
3. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans lequel le sable
récupéré est séparé des débris de liant dans un système de triage séparé.