[0001] The present invention relates to a noise-reduction device for reducing the noises
generated from the tank of a stationary induction apparatus such as a transformer
or reactor.
[0002] With the recent expansion of urban areas and the resultant construction of residential
housings near to a power station or substation, the demand has increasingly be raised
for reducing the noises generated from stationary induction apparatuses such as the
transformer. The noises of the stationary induction apparatuses are caused by the
magnetostriction of the core which in turn causes electromagnetic vibrations to be
transmitted to the tank through such a medium as oil and are radiated into the atmosphere
as a noise from the tank. Various measures have so far been taken to prevent such
noises.
[0003] In one method, the transformer is installed in a sound-proof building of concrete
or steel plates to shut off or absorb the noises. This method has various disadvantage
including an increased installation space of the stationary induction apparatus, an
increased production cost and a lengthened construction period.
[0004] A simple noise-reduction method for stationary induction apparatuses overcoming the
above-mentioned disadvantages in which the noises are cancelled by a sound of the
phase oposite to the noises of the stationary induction apparatus involved has been
suggested by Japanese Patent Publication No. 417/58 published on January 28, 1958,
which is based on U.S. Patent Application filed on February 9, 1955 by William B.
Conorver and Willard F.M. Gray and assigned to General Electric Company. This method,
however, is not yet practically used in view of the fact that the noises generated
by an induction apparatus, which is complicated in construction, include a multiplicity
of frequency components, thereby making it necessary to provide separate loud speakers
for different frequency components, with the result that an increased number of loud
speakers are required on the one hand and the adjustment of the frequency and sound
volume is complicated on the other hand.
[0005] A method to improve this disadvantage is disclosed in U.S. Patent Application Serial
No. 279,814 filed on July 2, 1981 by Yasuro Hori et al. and entiled "Vibration/Noise
Reduction Device for Electrical Apparatus", in which the vibrations generated in an
induction apparatus are detected and the frequency components of the vibrations are
determined by Fourier transformation, so that additional vibrations are applied in
a manner to cancel the vibrations of the respective frequency components by vibrators
mounted on the induction apparatus. This system also requires a number of vibrators
as in the case of the above-mentioned Japanese Patent Publication. Further, vibrators
of larger power is required to cancel the vibrations of the induction apparatus.
[0006] U.S. Patent co-pending Application Serial No. 406,564 filed August 9, 1982 by Syuya
Hagiwara and Yasuro Hori and entitled "Method and Apparatus for Reducing Vibrations
of Stationary Induction Apparatus" also discloses a system similar to the one disclosed
in U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 279,814, in which the phase and amplitude of
the vibrations caused by the vibrators are adjusted advantageously. The above-mentioned
problems, however, are not solved even by this suggested method.
[0007] Other conventional systems include U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 217,772 filed
December 18, 1980 and entitled "Static Induction Apparatus" in which a sound- insulating
plate is mounted on the framework such as a reinforcing channel on the outside surface
of the tank through an elastic member thereby to reduce the noises produced from the
tank, and Japanese Patent Publication No. 87306/81 entitled "Static Induction Apparatus"
in which a similar sound-insulation panel is provided with a weighty material thereby
to reduce the vibrations trans-. mitted from the tank through the reinforcing channel
to the sound insulation panel. The former method has the disadvantage that although
the noises (primary noises) radiated by way of the outer wall of the tank through
the oil from the winding and core are capable of being reduced, it is impossible to
reduce the noises (secondary noises) caused by the vibrations of the sound insulation
panels in which the vibrations are transmitted from the outer wall of the tank through
the reinforcing channel. In the latter method comprising a sound insulation panel
and a weighty material combined which is intended to reduce the secondary noises,
on the other hand, the noise reduction level is limited by the physical limitations
of the strength or dimensions of the elastic member for carrying the sound insulation
panels or the size of the weighty material.
[0008] An object of the present invention is to provide a noise-reduction device for stationary
induction apparatuses, which obviates the disadvantages of the prior art devices and
effectively reduces the noises caused by the tank.
[0009] - In order to achieve this object, according to the present invention, there is provided
a noise-reduction device, in which the primary noises radiated from the outer wall
of the tank are prevented by sound insulation panels mounted on the outer wall of
the tank through a framework such as reinforcing channels, and vibration cancelling
means including vibration sensors and vibrators are mounted on the sound insulation
panels, so that the controlling force of a phase opposite to the vibration transmitted
from the tank through the reinforcing channel to the sound insulation panels causing
the secondary noises is applied thereto, thus making it possible to cancel the vibrations
by a smaller number of vibrators with a smaller controlling force than when the controlling
force is applied directly to the tank.
[0010] The above and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention will
be apparent from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments of
the invention in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
Fig. 1 is a partly cut-away side view showing the general construction of a noise
reduction device for a transformer according to an embodiment of the present invention;
Fig. 2 is a partly cut-away perspective view of a noise reduction device on which
sound insulation panels and reinforcing channels are mounted;
Fig. 3 is a enlarged sectional view at left hand portion of Fig. 1;
Fig. 4 is a perspective view of the essential parts showing a configuration of a noise
reduction device for a transformer according to another embodiment of the present
invention; and
Fig. 5 is a central longitudinal sectional view taken parallel to the tank plan view
with the noise reduction device of Fig. 4 mounted on the tank through the reinforcing
frames.
[0011] An embodiment of the present invention will be described below with reference to
Figs. 1, 2 and 3.
[0012] In these figures, reference numeral 1 designates a transformer tank containing a
winding and core 18 and filled with an insulating oil 19. At least a pair of reinforcing
channels 3 of U-shaped steel surrounding the tank 1 are securely welded to the side
walls 2 of the tank 1 thereby to reinforce the tank 1. A plurarity of sound-insulation
panels 4 surrounding the whole periphery of the tank including the main vibration
section providing a noise source are mounted in such a manner as to close the part
of the side walls 2 between the reinforcing channels 3. At the part of the side walls
2 which is covered by the sound insulation panels 4, as shown by the arrow A in Fig.
3, the primary noises radiated by the vibrations generated from the winding and core
18 and transmitted to the side walls 2 through the insulating oil 19 are blocked by
the sound insulation panels 4. The sound insulation panels 4 is preferably made of
highly damped plate with resin sandwiched between a pair of steel plates which absorbs
vibrations more than an ordinary steel plate.
[0013] In this construction, however, although the primary noises caused by the vibrations
of the side walls 2 covered by the sound insulation panels 4 are attenuated sufficiently,
what is called the secondary noises radiated by the vibrations of the sound insulation
panels 4 in which the vibrations are transmitted from the side walls 2 through the
reinforcing channels 3 as shown by the arrow B are hardly reduced.
[0014] According to the embodiment under consideration, vibration sensors 5 and vibrators
6 are mounted on the sound insulation panels 4, so that detection signals from the
vibration sensors 5 are applied to a control signal generator 7, which in turn applies
a control signal to the vibrators 6 through an amplifier 8. The vibration transmitted
from the reinforcing channels 3 to the sound insulation panels 4 is thus detected
by the vibration sensors 5 and a control signal corresponding to the detection signal
is generated by the generator 7, which signal, after being amplified by the amplifier
8, is applied to the vibrators 6 to generate vibrations of the phase opposite to the
vibrations transmitted to the sound insulation panels 4, thereby cancelling the vibrations
of the sound insulation panels 4.
[0015] The circuit configuration and the operation of the control signal generator, the
amplifier and the vibrators are essentially identical to those of similar devices
disclosed in aforesaid U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 279,814, except that according
to the present invention, the vibrators are adapted to reduce the vibrations transmitted
to the sound insulation panels but not the vibrations of the tank itself and therefore
a smaller number of vibrators with a smaller power are used to achieve the object
of the invention.
[0016] The vibration sensors 4 and the vibrators 5 are mounted on the sound insulation panels
4 in such a manner of construction as shown in Fig. 3. Each of the vibration sensors
5 and the vibrators 6 is held on a mounting plate 9, which is bolted replaceably to
the sound insulation panel 4 so that the vibration sensor 5 and the vibrator 6 are
situted in the space between the sound insulation panel 4 and the side plate 2 through
a hole 10. Lead wires 11, 12 from the vibration sensor 5 and the vibrator 6 are led
through a hole 13 into a reinforcing channel 3 and after being wired therein, are
connected to the control signal generator 7 and the amplifier 8 together with the
lead wires of the other vibration sensors and vibrators.
[0017] The advantages of the present invention are described below.
[0018]
(1) The sound insulation panel 4, which does not participate in the strength of the
tank, may be made of a comparatively thin plate and is capable of reducing the vibrations
with a small control power as compared with the conventional method in which the control
power is applied directly to the outer surface of the tank.
(2) Since the vibrations of the reinforcing channel of comparatively simplified construction
provide a source of vibrations of the sound insulation panel, a smaller number of
frequency components are contained than the vibrations of the induction apparatus,
and therefore a smaller number of vibrators are required than when the vibrations
of the induction apparatus are cancelled directly.
(31 The vibration sensors 5 and the vibrators 6 are easily removable from the sound
insulation panels 4 and therefore the maintenance and inspection thereof are easy.
(4) The vibration cancelling devices including the vibration sensors 5 and the vibrators
6 are contained in the space surrounded by the tank side walls 2 and the reinforcing
channels 3, and therefore the tank dimension is not substantially increased. Further,
the vibration cancelling devices, which are enclosed by the sound insulation panels
4 and the mounting plates 9, are not exposed to the elements and have a longer service
life.
(5) The lead wires 11 and 12 of the vibration sensor 5 and the vibrator 6 are wired
through the channel 3, thus eliminating the need of an exclusive piping for the lead
wires.
[0019] Another embodiment of the present invention will be described with reference to Figs.
4 and 5. In this embodiment, the sound insulation panel 4 is mounted on the reinforcing
channels 3 through a frame 14 and a flexible thin plate 15. The vibration sensor 5
and the vibrator 6 are mounted on the frame 14 through mounting frames 16. The vibration
sensor 5 and the vibrator 6 alternatively may be mounted directly on the frame 14
without the mounting frame 16. Numeral 17 designates an inspection cover.
[0020] In this construction, the frame 14 and the thin plate 15 function as a weighty member
and a spring respectively thereby to reduce the transmission of the vibrations from
the reinforcing channel 3. The vibration reduce effect may be increased by reducing
the spring constant of the thin plate 15 and increasing the weight of the frame 14.
The limitation of the strength and dimensions, however, limit the vibration damping
effect.
[0021] According to the present embodiment, the vibrators 6 are mounted on the frame 14
through the mounting frame 16 so that the force of the phase opposite to the vibrations
applied through the reinforcing channels 3 is applied to the tank 1 thereby to cancel
the vibrations thereof, thus cancelling the vibrations of the sound insulation panels
4 and the inspection cover 17 connected with the frame 14.
[0022] Each vibrator 6 is mounted on the frame 14 by reason of the fact that the frame 14
has a larger rigidity than the sound insulation panel 4, resulting in a smaller number
of natural vibration frequencies in the frequency range to be reduced. Specifically,
when cancelling the vibrations of a structure by applying a control force thereto,
vibrators as many as number of the natural vibration frequencies are theoretically
required. When the vibrators 6 are mounted, not on the sound insulation panel 4, but
on the frame 14 which is larger in rigidity, a smaller number of natural vibration
frequencies to be reduced are involved, thus making it possible to reduce the vibrations
with a smaller number of vibrators 6. The embodiment under consideration, which uses
a control signal generator, an amplifier and vibrators similar to those of the first
embodiment, has the advantages mentioned below.
[0023] (1) As in the first embodiment, only the power sufficient to cancel the vibrations
of the sound insulation panels are required and therefore the output power of the
vibrators is reduced.
[0024] (2) Since the vibrations of the sound insulation panels 4 are controlled by the frame
14 larger in rigidity and smaller in the number of natural vibration frequencies to
be reduced, the number of the frequency components of the vibrations to be cancelled
is further decreased as compared with the first embodiment, thus reducing the number
of vibrators required.
[0025] C3) The sound insulation panel 4 is supported from the reinforcing channel 3 by a
spring of the thin plate 15, and therefore the vibration system of the sound insulation
panel 4 may be considered substantially independently of the reinforcing channel 3,
thereby clarifying and making it easy to predict the vibration characteristics of
the sound insulation panel 4. This facilitates the vibration control on the one hand
and improves the stability of vibration control on the other hand.
[0026] (4) By removing the inspection covers 17, the 'maintenance and inspection of the
vibration sensors 5 and the vibrators 6 are easily carried out.
[0027] (51 In view of the fact that the vibration cancelling devices including the vibration
sensors 5, the vibrators 5 and the frame 14 are contained in the space surrounded
by the tank side plates 2 and the reinforcing channels 3, the tank dimension is not
generally increased. Further, since the vibration cancelling devices are hermetically
enclosed by the sound insulation panels 4, the thin plates 15 and the inspection covers
17, the vibration cancelling devices are not exposed to the elements, thus ensuring
the long service life thereof.
[0028] (6) The fact that the vibrators 6 are mounted through the mounting frames 16 makes
it possible to control a plurality of points (four points in the case of Fig. 4) by
a single vibrator 6, thus increasing the vibration reducing effect.
[0029] It will be understood from the foregoing description that according to the present
invention, the primary noises radiated from the surface of the tank are reduced by
sound insulation panels mounted on the outer walls of the tank through framework such
as reinfocing channels on the one hand, the vibration cancelling devices including
vibration sensors and vibrators are mounted on sound insulation panels or weighty
members installed on the sound insulation panels thereby to apply the controlling
force of opposite phase to the vibrations transmitted to the sound insulation panels
through the reinforcing channels from the tank causing the secondary noises on the
other hand. As compared with the prior art devices in which the controlling force
is applied directly to the tank, the noises generated from the tank are effectively
reduced by a small number of vibrators with smaller power.
1. A noise-reduction device for a stationary induction apparatus comprising a tank
(1) filled with the insulating oil (19) and an induction apparatus (18) mounted in
said tank, said noise-reduction device comprising:
first means mounted on at least two reinforcing channels (3) arranged substantially
parallely to each other in spaced relationship therebetween on side walls (2) of said
tank (1) in a manner to surround said tank (1), said first means including sound insulation
panels (4) provided to surround the part of said tank side walls (2) between said
reinforcing channels (3), thereby reducing the noises generated from said winding
and core and radiating outside through said insulating oil (19) and said tank side
walls (2); and
second means for cancelling the vibrations of said sound insulation panels, including
a plurality of vibration sensors (5) for detecting the vibrations of said sound insulation
panels (41, a plurality of vibrators (6) for applying to said sound insulation panels
(4) such vibrations as to cancel the frequency components of the vibrations detected
by said vibration sensors (6) respectively.
2. A noise reduction device for a stationary induction apparatus according to Claim
1, wherein said sound insulation panels (4) arranged substantially parallelly with
said tank side walls (2) form a space with said tank side walls (.2).
3. A noise-reduction device for a stationary induction apparatus according to Claim
2, wherein said vibrators (6) are mounted with said sound insulation panels (4) in
the space between said tank side walls C2) and said sound insulation panels (4).
4. A noise-reduction device for a stationary induction apparatus according to Claim
2, wherein each of said vibrators (6) is mounted on a plate member (16) mounted removably
on said sound insulation panel (4) in a manner to enclose the opening formed in each
of said sound insulation panels (4).
5. A noise-reduction device for a stationary induction apparatus according to Claim
1, comprising a flexible member (15) through which each of said sound insulation panels
(4) is mounted on said reinforcing channel (3), and a weighty member (14) on which
said vibrator (6) is mounted, said weighty member (14) being located at the junction
of each of said sound insulation panels (4) and said flexible member (15).
6. A noise-reduction device for a stationary induction apparatus according to Claim
5, wherein each of said sound insulation panels (4) includes a peep hole (10) for
said vibrators (6), said peep hole (10) being closed with a cover (17).