[0001] This invention relates to guns and is particularly applicable to guns having a relatively
long and massive barrel such as a battle tank. The direction of travel of a shell
fired by a gun depends on the boreline direction of the barrel in the region of the
muzzle, and even very small boreline errors can give rise to significant aiming errors
at long range. It has been found that even when relatively sophisticated optical aiming
sights are used to lay the gun on a target significant aiming errors can remain. These
errors are at least in part due to uncertainties in the direction of the boreline
of the muzzle, and they can stem from the presence of temperature gradients across
the diameter of the barrel which can cause the barrel to bend slightly and from mechanical
slackness in the supports which locate the barrel. It has been proposed elsewhere
to compensate for these errors by aligning the aiming mark of an optical sight with
a reference image obtained via a reflector mounted on the muzzle of the gun, so that
movement of the muzzle caused by distortion of the barrel can be detected.
[0002] Practical difficulties are experienced in implementing an optical system for monitoring
boreline errors, since the elevation axis of the barrel is invariably off-set from
that of the optical aiming sight of the gun or from that of a dedicated optical sensor
positioned to receive reflected light via the reflector at the muzzle. This difficulty
can be particularly severe in those cases where an arrangement for detecting muzzle
boreline pointing errors is to be fitted to an existing battle tank so as to upgrade
its performance to enable its firing accuracy to meet present day standards.
[0003] According to this invention, a gun includes a barrel mounted so as to be rotatable
in elevation; an optical imaging sensor located in the vicinity of an optical aiming
sight and arranged so that the muzzle of the barrel is within its field of view for
all possible operational angles of elevation of the barrel, whereby it receives an
image of the muzzle; and means operative to detect departures of said image from a
predetermined expected position related to the nominal angle of elevation of the barrel.
[0004] Generally a barrel is also movable in traverse (sometimes termed training) and such
a movement may cause the image of the muzzle to shift slightly relative to the optical
sensor - the amount of such shift depends on the particular geometry used to mount
the barrel and the sensor. In such a case, the position of the image of the muzzle
is also compared with its expected position in traverse to detect departures therefrom.
Since the muzzle is itself viewed by the optical sensor, the location of the optical
sensor is no longer critical with respect to the elevation axis of the barrel, as
would be the case if a reflector were used to return a narrow beam of light in the
manner of our co-pending patent application published under number 2069105A.
[0005] Conveniently part of the optical system of the optical aiming sight is used to receive
the image of the muzzle as, in general, the position of the barrel in elevation and
traverse is similar to the axis of the optical aiming sight - the elevation of the
barrel is varied somewhat above 'that of the optical sight depending on the range
of the target which is to be engaged.
[0006] Many existing battle tanks are provided with an optical aiming sight which is positioned
to one side of the axis of the barrel and is provided with an adjustable sight mirror
(sometimes termed a periscope mirror) whose angle is altered to adjust the viewing
angle of elevation of the optical sight. This mirror can also be conveniently used
to collect the image of the muzzle, and since the muzzle is laterally off-set from
the axis of the optical aiming sight, the two images, i.e. the image of the target
and the image of the muzzle, can be easily separated within the aiming sight itself.
Preferably the optical sensor comprises an optical detector having a two dimensional
image receiving surface which is used to identify the position of the muzzle. Generally
there will be a sufficient degree of optical contrast between the muzzle and its background
as to enable the muzzle position to be accurately determined using only very simple
signal processing. For example, in daylight the muzzle will appear as a very dark
shape against a bright sky background. If the image detector is sufficiently sensitive,
it may be possible to observe the muzzle by a similar technique even in conditions
of twilight or partial darkness. However, it is preferred to position a passive light
source at the muzzle so as to facilitate detection of its position during darkness.
The passive light source may be of a chemical nature so that its not adversely affected
by the vibration and shock experienced by the muzzle when the gun is fired.
[0007] If the muzzle departs from its correct position due to distortion of the barrel or
mechanical wear in its mounting, an estimate of the magnitude and sense of the error
can be made, and a correction signal injected into the optical aiming sight so as
to shift the aiming point of the sight to compensate. This correction can be achieved
in an automatic manner so that it is not necessary for the gunner to consciously monitor
the position of the muzzle in these conditions.
[0008] In some cases, the degree of error can be quite significant and can arise from several
sources. If the barrel is subject to uneven heating or cooling, thermal stress within
it can cause a degree of bending which alters the boreline direction of the barrel
in the region of the muzzle. Furthermore, it is customary to mount a barrel within
acradle so that it can slide backwards within the cradle when the
gun is fired so as to enable the recoil force to be absorbed. Mechanical slackness
within the cradle can impart uncertainty to the boreline direction of the barrel,
as can mechanical wear occurring within the trunnion bearings which supports the cradle
and enable its angle of elevation to be altered.
[0009] The invention is further described by way of example with reference to the accompanying
drawings, in which
Figures 1 and 2 shows part of the optical system for detecting position errors of
the muzzle,
Figure 3 shows the field of view of an optical sensor,
Figure 4 shows part of signal processing circuits by means of which the nature of
the position error can be determined, and
Figures 5 and 6 show explanatory waveforms relating to the operation of Figure 4.
[0010] Referring to Figures 1 and 2, only those parts of a battle tank necessary for an
understanding of the present invention are illustrated. A barrel 1 is slidably mounted
within a cradle 2 which in turn is mounted on trunnion bearings 3 so that the barrel
1 is rotatable in elevation relative to the body of a tank (not shown) on which it
is mounted. An optical aiming sight 4 is mounted along side'the barrel and is positioned
so that a distant target 4 can be viewed via a periscope mirror 6 which is rotatable
in elevation about an axis 7. A gunner acquires the target 5 i conventional manner
by centering an image of the target within the cross wires of his eyepiece 8. The
barrel of the gun and the optical sight are both mounted on a rotatable turret so
that they move together in traverse although the sight can be moved relative to the
traverse axis and elevati axis to a certain extent. The barrel 1 therefore points
in the same general traverse direction as the optical sight, but it is off-set in
elevation therefrom by an angle which is related to the range of the target. If the
tank is not standing on level ground, or if a strong cross wind is blowing, the optical
sight will also be effected somewhat fi the traverse angle of the barrel. Thus in
general, the boresight direction 9 of the barrel is somewhat above the 1: of sight
10 of the optical sight, but is unlikely to differ therefrom by a very large angle.
[0011] It is customary to use some form of ballistic computer to calculate the actual elevation
and traverse angles of the barrel in order to strike a target with a high degree o
probability of success. Various factors affect the trajecto of a shell which is fired
from the barrel of the gun and amongst other things these factors include the temperature
and nature of the ammunition, wind strength and air pressure. All of these factors
are taken into account in automatically adjusting the aiming mark of the eyepiece
8 so that it is merely necessary for a gunner to align the aiming mark with the optical
image of the target 5. The position of the aiming mark in the eyepiece 8 assumes that
the boreline direction of the muzzle 11 is correct, but in practice, the position
of the muzzle can alter relative to the body of the tank due to mechanical wear within
the cradle and the trunnion bearings as previously mentioned. Even very minor positional
errors at the muzzle 11 can alter the boresight direction of the barrel and significantly
reduce the probability of successfully striking a target.
[0012] The actual position of the muzzle 11 is viewed by an optical detector 20 via optical
path 21. The same periscope mirror 6 is used, since in general the angular position
of the muzzle will not deviate significantly from that of the target 5. As can be
seen from Figure 1, the position of the muzzle is laterally off-set from the optical
path 10 by the distance x and thus the optical detector 20 can be readily accommodated
along side the optical sight 4. The use of the deflection prism 22 and the lens 23
allow the detector 20 to be located at any convenient position adjacent to that of
the optical aiming sight 4.
[0013] The optical detector 20 can take any convenient form, but in view of the hostile
environment in which it is situated, it is preferable to use a two dimensional solid
state optical sensor, which is scanned in a raster pattern in a manner which is similar
to that of a television camera arrangement. By using the optical detector 20, the
actual position of the muzzle 11 can be compared with stored data relating to its
proper position for each angle of elevation and traverse. If any discrepancy is found,
a compensating signal can be applied to the optical sight 8, so as to produce a small
shift of the aiming position.
[0014] As the field of view of the optical detector 20 is an oblique view along the length
of the barrel 1, the optical detector receives an image of the kind illustrated diagrammatically
in Figure 3. This Figure represents a light background 30, consisting of relatively
bright sky and a dark mass 31 representing the bulk of the barrel 1. The curved interface
region 32 between light and dark represents the position of the muzzle 11 itself.
In order to determine whether the line 32 is in exactly the correct position, two
windows 33 and 34 are electrically inserted into the scanning raster of the optical
detector and the positions of the windows are chosen so that the line 32 should pass
exactly mid-way through both of the windows. Any departure from the mid position generates
an error signal which is indicative of the nature and sense of the positional error.
Compensation is then applied to the aiming mark in the optical sight, and as the optical
sight tracks the changing position of the aiming mark the error is progressively eliminated.
[0015] One signal processing system for enabling the error corrections to be generated is
illustrated diagrammatically in Figure 4. The output of the optical detector 20 of
Figure 2 is in the form of a video signal consisting of sequential line scans in the
manner of a conventional television raster. This signal is received at terminal 40
and portions of it corresponding to the two line scans A and B in which the windows
33 and 34 appear are gated out by a gate circuit 41. The portions of the video signal
to be gated out are determined by the contents of a data store 42, which is accessed
in dependence on the nominal elevation and traverse angles of the barrel 1. These
angles are obtained from suitable angular position sensors 43 and 54. The data store
42 thus sets a window generator 44, which generates a window signal corresponding
to the duration and position of the two windows 33 and 34. In this example, it is
assumed for convenience that both windows 33 and 34 are of identical durations so
that a common window generator 44 can be used, but this need not necessarily be the.case.
The data store 42 controls the gate circuit 41 so as to select appropriate video lines
corresponding to the vertical positions of the two windows 33 and 34, the line signal
corresponding to the vertical position of window 33 being termed line A and the other
video line being termed line B. These two video lines are passed via respective amplifiers
and limiters 45 and 46 and applied to three dual input logic gates 47, 48 and 49.
The inverse of video line B is applied to the logic gate 49. Each of the three logic
gates receives an enable signal from the window generator 44 so that an output logic
signal is generated accordingly. The outputs of the three logic gates are subtracted
at the two further logic gates 50 and 51, so as to produce the two output signals
indicated adjacent to the two output terminals 52 and 53. The signal received at terminal
52 is indicative of any Y axis positional error i.e. elevation error, and the signal
produced at terminal 53 is indicative of X axis error, i.e. traverse error.
[0016] The way in which these signals are generated is illustrated more specifically in
Figures 5 and 6, Figure 5A showing the corresponding waveforms which result when the
muzzle 11 is correctly positioned, Figure 5B illustrating the waveforms which result
when the traverse position of the result is correct, but is low in elevation. Figure
6A illustrates the waveforms for the case in which the elevation position of the muzzle
is correct, but the traverse is displaced to the left and finally, Figure 6B illustrates
a composite error in which the muzzle is both too high and displaced to the right.
In view of the interconnection of the logic circuits which is illustrated in Figure
4, it is believed that the way in which the various waveforms are generated is self-explantory.
It will be apparent from Figures 5 and 6 that the polarity of the Y axis signal indicates
the sense of the error, and has the zero value whenno error is present. However, the
X axis signal produces a pair of pulses which are symmetrically balanced when there
is no traverse error. The effect of a traverse error is to unbalance the symmetry
so that from the relative durations of the pair of pulses, the sense of the error
can be readily determined. The two control signals X and Y are applied to the eyepiece
8 in a conventional manner so as to shift the position of the aiming mark which are
viewed by a gunner. The nature of the control signals may be fed via a simple decoder
so as to convert them to the form in which they can be accepted by the eyepiece 8,
but the exact nature of the decoder will, of course, depend on the kind of eyepiece
used, and the mechanism by means of which the aiming mark is moved.
1. A gun including a barrel (1) mounted so as to be rotatable in elevation; an optical
imaging sensor (20) located in the vicinity of an optical aiming sight (4) and arranged
so that the muzzle (11) of the barrel is within its field of view for all possible
operational angles of elevation of the barrel, whereby it receives an image of the
muzzle; and means (figure 4) operative to detect departures of said image from a predetermined
expected position related to the nominal angle of elevation of the barrel.
2. A gun as claimed in claim 1 and wherein means are provided for detecting errors
in the position of said image in both elevation and traverse.
3. A gun as claimed in claim 1 (or 2) and wherein part of the optical system of the
optical aiming sight is used to receive the image of the muzzle.
4. A gun as claimed in claim 3 and wherein the image of the muzzle is passed to said
optical sensor via an adjustable sight mirror which forms part of the optical aiming
sight.
5. A gun as claimed in any of the preceding claims and wherein the optical sensor
comprises an optical detector having a two-dimensional image receiving surface, and
which is arranged to enable the position of the image on its surface to be determined.
6. A gun as claimed in claim 5 and wherein the optical detector is a solid state device
in which the two-dimensional image receiving surface is scanned in a television-like
raster pattern.
7. A gun as claimed in claim 6 and wherein the actual position of the image on said
surface is compared with an expected position so as to detect departures therefrom.
8. A gun as claimed in claim 7 and wherein the expected position of the image is defined
in terms of windows inserted at predetermined positions into selected line scans of
the raster pattern.
9. A gun as claimed in any of the preceding claims and wherein departures of said
image from its expected position are used to shift an aiming mark in said optical
aiming sight so as to compensate for said departures. A