[0001] This invention relates to lubricating oil compositions which exhibit marked improvements
in fuel economy. More particularly, this invention relates to lubricating oil compositions
which contain very minor proportions of a glycerol fatty acid ester fuel economy additive
in combination with an oil-soluble organic copper compound.
[0002] It is a current objective of the industry to provide lubricating oil compositions
which exhibit improvements in fuel savings in gasoline and diesel engine vehicles.
To meet that current goal, a new category of additives commonly referred to as fuel
economy additives are being developed which function primarily to increase the miles
or kilometers obtained per unit volume of fuel. Since modern day lubricating oil compositions
are complex formulations, such additives must be compatible with the other components
of such compositions and should not adversely affect the numerous other functions
of conventional lubricant additives such as dispersancy, viscosity stability, corrosion
and oxidation inhibition, and the like.
[0003] Illustrative of recent patents reflecting developments in this field are U.S. Patents
4,201,684 and 4,208,293. These patents show the use of fatty acid amides and sulfurized
amides as additives which have fuel economy benefits as demonstrated by friction reducing
data.
[0004] The present invention concerns the use of glycerol fatty acid esters as such fuel
economy additives, specifically glycerol esters of C
16-C
18 fatty acids in combination with oil-soluble copper organic compounds. There is prior
art disclosing the use of each of these materials in lubricating oil compositions
which is discussed hereinbelow.
[0005] British Application 2097813A, published November 10, 1982, discloses the use of 0.05
to 0.2 wt% glycerol partial esters of C
16-C
18 fatty acids as fuel economy additives. The present invention is an improvement over
said British application.
[0006] West German Application P-2949940 and P-2949910 of Chevron Research Company, both
published July 3, 1980, disclose the use of glycerol fatty esters as fuel economy
additives. These references state that the addition of 0.25 to 2 weight percent, preferably
0.40 to 1.25 weight percent, of a fatty acid ester will offer a fuel economy credit
of 2-3 percent in both gasoline and diesel engines. Glycerol oleic acid esters are
preferred. West German Application P-2949940 illustrates the preferred embodiment
showing the use of the glycerol ester at the same treat level in combination with
zinc dihydrocarbyl dithiophosphate additives. Similarly U.S. Patent 4,304,678 discloses
hydroxyl-containing esters including glycerol oleates as being effective friction
modifiers only at levels of 1-4 wt% with no benefit observed at levels less than 1%
by wt. in oil.
[0007] In contrast to the teachings of these references, the present invention is based
upon the discovery that very low levels of glycerol esters; that is, up to about 0.2
percent by weight, in combination with certain amounts of oil-soluble organic copper
compounds, provide enhanced performance of these fuel economy lubricating oils. No
benefit is obtainable in using relatively higher amounts and in some cases substantial
debits in terms of formulation stability or adverse performance may occur.
[0008] Another reference disclosing the use of polyol- carboxylic acid esters in lubricating
oil compositions is U.S. Patent 3,933,659, which shows a multi-component functional
fluid, one component of which can be a polyol ester friction modifier or a fatty acid
amide friction modifier. The primary use disclosed in that reference is for automatic
transmission fluids. U.S. Patent 3,273,981 discloses antiwear additives comprising
a mixture of dimer acids and a partial ester of a polyhydric alcohol, the additive
being noted as improving lubricity as well as functioning in the anti-wear category.
U.S. Patent 3,112,271 discloses glycerol mono-oleate as an extreme pressure additive
as does U.S. 3,112,269 and U.S. 3,041,284. U.S. 2,493,483 discloses marine engine
lubricants which contain a partial ester of glycerol or other polyol fatty acid esters
in amounts of from 0.05 to 1 percent.
[0009] Other references disclosing polyol esters of fatty acids are represented.by U.S.
2,788,326, which discloses these compounds as being useful in extreme pressure lubricants
and U.S. Patent 2,527,889, which shows the same polyol esters, such as glycerol monooleate,
being useful as anti-corrosion agents in turbine oils and diesel fuels.
[0010] The use of oil-soluble copper compounds at levels of about 5 to 500 parts per million
(ppm) of copper by weight, based on the total weight of lubricating oil composition,as
a highly effective antioxidant is a relatively recent development of additive technology
and is disclosed in European Published Application No. 0024146, published on February
25, 1981.
[0011] The present invention is based on the discovery that these copper compounds, when
used in an oil in combination with glycerol esters, e.g. oleates, act cooperatively
with the glycerol ester in substantially increasing the fuel economy of the formulated
oil. The cumulative effect observed would not be expected by adding the fuel economy
credit obtained in oils which contain one or the other of the glycerol ester or copper
compound. Data obtained therefore provide the basis for an unexpected additive effect
upon fuel economy due to more effective lubrication of an internal combustion engine
operated using the oils of the present invention.
[0012] The prior art also recognizes that copper components per se can be favorable friction
reducing agents in certain circumstances. German Democratic Republic Patents 145,469
and 145,470 disclose the reduction of wear and friction in iron/iron and iron/bronze
friction interfaces using polyol or mineral oil lubricants containing copper compounds
such as copper naphthenate, copper octoate, copper stearate and reaction products
of lubricants themselves with copper, copper oxide and copper salts of inorganic acids.
These references indicate that the friction reduction is achieved by deposition on
the substrate being lubricated of a film reaction layer of copper with adequate adhesion
properties. It is recommended in these references that the concentration of the copper
compound in the lubricant provide a copper content of 0.001 to 5 volume % relative
to the lubricant. These references however did not evaluate lubricating oil compositions
for internal combustion engines.
[0013] In accordance with the present invention, there are provided fuel economy improving
lubricating oil compositions for internal combustion engines which comprise an oil
of lubricating viscosity and, as the fuel economy additive, a combination from 0.05
to 0.20 weight percent of a glycerol partial ester of a C
16-C
18 fatty acid with from 5 to 500 ppm (parts per million) copper present in the form
of an oil-soluble copper compound, preferably about 60 to 200 ppm copper being present,
based upon the weight of the total composition, the copper compound also functioning
as an antioxidant.
[0014] The lubricating oil compositions of the present invention comprise both straight
grade and multigrade lubricating oil formulations for both gasoline and diesel (compression
ignition) engines. Thus, in the practice of the present invention the lubricating
oil compositions will contain those additive systems formulated to meet the viscosity
requirements or other specifications as required for qualification as a gasoline engine
or diesel lubricating oil. A straight grade lubricating oil formulation will normally
contain conventional amounts of an ashless dispersant, a normal or basic metal detergent,
an anti-wear additive and an antioxidant and a multi-grade oil will contain, in addition
to the foregoing, a viscosity index improver or viscosity modifier. In addition to
these principal additives, very small proportions of other special purpose additives,
such as pour depressants, rust inhibitors, anti-foamants and the like are conventionally
blended into lubricating oil compositions.
[0015] The ester component of the fuel economy additive of the present invention is preferably
a glycerol mono- or diester of a saturated or unsaturated C
16-C
18 fatty acid, such as oleic or linoleic acid. Optimum efficiency has been found to
be at about the 0.1 to 0.2 weight percent level and use in the excess of this amount
may even be detrimental to the overall performance of the lubricating oil composition.
[0016] Oil-soluble copper components useful herein include both cuprous or cupric compounds
which are oil-soluble under normal blending conditions in the oil additive package.
Particularly preferred are the copper salts of C
10-C
22 fatty acids, such as stearic or palmitic acid, but copper salts of unsaturated acids,
such as oleic acid, linoleic acid, naphthenic acid of 200-500 molecular weight or
synthetic carboxylic acids are preferred. The particularly preferred embodiment is
copper (cupric) oleate when present in an amount to provide about 100 to 150 ppm copper
in the lubricating oil composition.
[0017] Other suitable copper compounds include the same as those disclosed in said European
Published Application 0024146 and these include copper dithiocarbamates of the formula
(RR'NCSS)
nCu where n is 1 or 2 and R and R' are the same or different
Cl-Cl8 hydrocarbyl radicals, preferably
C2-C
8 alkyl, copper sulphonates, copper phenates and acetyl acetonates as well as copper
dihydrocarbyl dithiophosphate, the hydrocarbyl being C
1-C
18 and preferably
C2-C
8 alkyl, such as a hexyl or isooctyl.
[0018] Crankcase oil formulations to which the present invention relates are those which
contain a major amount of lubricating oil and effective amounts of conventional additives
in addition to the aforesaid fuel economy additive, the copper compound serving the
dual function of being both an antioxidant and, in combination with the glycerol oleate,
a fuel economy additive. Percentages of additives as described herein are by weight
based on the total weight of lubricating oil formulation unless otherwise indicated.
[0019] These conventional additives comprise ashless dispersants typically nitrogen-containing
dispersant additives which are oil-soluble salts, amides, imides and esters made from
high molecular weight mono- or di-carboxylic acids and various amines having an amino
or heterocyclic nitrogen with at least one amido or hydroxy group capable of salt,
amide or ester formation. Preferred are the reaction products of polyolefin (C
2-C
5 olefin), such as polyisobutenyl, succinic anhydride with an alkylene polyamine such
as tetraethylenepentamine. The polyisobutenyl portion has between 50 and 250 carbon
atoms. The alkylene polyamines are those represented by the formula:
NH
2(CH2)
n(NH(CH
2)
n)
m-NH2
where n is 2 to 3 and m is a number from 0 to 10. Mixtures of alkylene polyamines
which approximate tetraethylenepentamine are commercially available materials. Dispersants
are used generally in amounts of from about 0.1 to 10 wt.%, preferably in the range
of about 0.5 to 5 wt %, based on the weight of the lubricating oil composition.
[0020] Detergents useful in the formulations include the normal, basic or overbased metal,
that is, calcium, magnesium and so forth, salts of petroleum naphthenic acids, petroleum
sulfonic acids, alkyl benzene sulfonic acids, alkyl phenols, alkylene-bis-phenol,
oil-soluble fatty acids and the like. The preferred materials are the normal or overbased
calcium or magnesium phenates, sulfurized phenates and/or sulfonates, and these metal-containing
detergent additives are typically used in amounts of from 1 to 3 wt % based on the
total weight of lubricating oil compositions.
[0021] Suitable pour point depressants, which are usually present in amounts of about 0.01
to 1 wt.%, include wax alkylated aromatic hydrocarbons, olefin polymers and copolymers,
acrylate and methacrylate polymers and copolymers.
[0022] Anti-wear additives generally are the oil-soluble zinc dihydrocarbyl dithiophosphates
having a least a total of 5 carbon atoms, the alkyl group being preferably C
2-C
S. These are typically present in amounts of from 0.01 to 5 wt. %, preferably 0.5 to
1.5 wt. %, in the lubricating oil.
[0023] Suitable conventional viscosity index improvers, or viscosity modifiers, are the
olefin polymers such as polybutene, ethylene-propylene copolymers, hydrogenated polymers
and copolymers and terpolymers of styrene with isoprene and/or butadiene, polymers
of alkyl acrylates or alkyl methacrylates, copolymers of alkylmethacrylates with N-vinyl
pyrrolidone or dimethylaminoalkyl methacrylate, post-grafted polymers of ethylene-propylene
with an active monomer, such as maleic anhydride, which may be further reacted with
an alcohol or an alkylene polyamine, styrene-maleic anhydride polymers post- reacted
with alcohols and amines and the like. These additives are used in amounts of about
1.5% to 15% by wt., depending on the exact viscosity specifications desired.
[0024] Conventionally used antioxidants include phenols, hindered phenols, bis-pheno1s,
sulfurized phenols, catechol, alkylated and sulfurized alkylated catechols, diphenylamine,
alkylated diphenylamines and phenyl-l-naphthylamines, alkyl and aryl borates, phosphites
and phosphates, trialkyl and triaryl dithiophosphates and the like.
[0025] Suitable hydrocarbon base stocks are those mineral oils of lubricating viscosity
as measured by ASTM D-455 of from about 2 to 40, preferably 5 to 20 centistokes at
99
0C.
[0026] These conventional additives are used in amounts normally necessary to provide their
attendant functions in a formulated crankcase lubricating oil composition. Very small
proportions of additional special purpose additives, such as anti-foam agents or rust
inhibitors, may also be present in a fully formulated lubricating oil composition.
[0027] The invention is further illustrated by the following Examples.
EXAMPLE 1
[0028] The reference oil used in this example was a formulated straight grade 20W30 crankcase
mineral lubricating oil (corresponding to ASTM "HR" oil) to which was added 0.2 weight
percent of a glycerol monooleate (GMO) fuel economy additive or 0.2 weight percent
of a fuel economy additive being a mixture (GMO/GDO) of glycerol monooleate and glycerol
dioleate in a weight ratio of 3 parts of GMO to 2 parts of GDO in said mixture. The
reference oil contained 2.10 wt % dispersant, 1.10 wt. % antioxidant, 1.00 wt. % basic
metal detergent, 1. 95 wt. % anti- wear additive, 0.21 wt % pour depressant and 0.001
wt. % anti-foam agent. This type of reference oil, which is generally accepted by
the industry for establishing fuel economy data, provides a reproducible baseline
against which fuel economy credits may be measured and is considered to provide test
results which accurately reflect the effect of a given fuel economy additive.
[0029] Fuel economy was evaluated using the Laboratory Engine Fuel Economy Test (LEFET)
summarized below:
The fuel economy test used is a fired engine procedure. The engine is a 5.0 liter,
V-8 Chevrolet engine coupled to a water cooled electric dynamometer. The engine is
run with a dry sump by the use of external oil pumps. One pump supplies oil to the
oil gallery from an external sump and a second pump scavenges the sump and returns
the oil to the external sump. The conditions that the engine runs at are as follows:

[0030] The results are expressed as a percentage fuel economy credit with respect to the
referenced oil, as are all fuel economy credit results reported in the Examples. Results
at the 0.2 wt. % treat level for both GMO and the GMO/GDO mixture are set forth in
Table I.

EXAMPLE 2
[0031]
(a) Comparative evaluations utilizing increased amounts of the GMO/GDO mixture, that
is, at the 0.3 weight percent and 0.5 weight percent levels showed no increase in
fuel economy credit for treatment at these levels and in some cases, an adverse effect
on fuel economy credits or other lubricating oil performance criteria, such as increased
piston deposit formation tendencies or poor results in bearing corrosion tests.
(b) Coefficient of friction (CF) testing using a Roxana Four-ball wear tester in acordance
with the procedure described in ASTM D2266-67 at 110°C, 2.5 RPM at both 15 kg and
3 kg was carried out with a formulated mineral oil (Base oil) containing conventional
amounts of dispersant (2.12 %), basic metal sulfonate (1.02%), antioxidant (0.72%),
anti-wear additive (1.96%) and viscosity index improver (only present at 8.7 wt. %
in test oils 5 and 6 to evaluate compatibility) to which was added varying amounts
of the GDO/GMO mixture. The results in Table II below show essentially no additional
friction reducing benefit at levels in excess of 0.2 wt. % and, at 0.9 wt. % in the
test, potential instability or incompatibility was observed since the samples appeared
hazy.

EXAMPLE 3
[0032] (a) The Laboratory Fuel Economy Test of Example 1 was repeated utilizing a 10W40
multigrade mineral oil containing 0.09 wt. % of the GMO/GDO mixture as the fuel economy
additive. The oil contained about 14% by wt. of a multifunctional dispersant viscosity
index improver (acryloid 1155), 0.5% dispersant, 1.85% of basic metal detergent, 0.75
wt.% of anti-wear additive and 0.75% antioxidant.
[0033] Table III shows the fuel economy credits over the oil used as the reference in Example
1.

Laboratory Fuel Economy results were confirmed in the Proposed ASTM 5 Car Interim
Fuel Economy Procedure which utilized the EPA car certification cycle in 5 automobiles
having engine sizes of 2.3 liter, 2.8 liter, 3.7 liter, 3.8 liter and 5.0 liter. Five
Car average fuel economy credit of 1.64% was obtained in one series of fuel economy
tests.
[0034] Based upon these results one would expect that the fuel economy credits attributed
to a glycerol mono-oleate to be non-cumulative when the treatment level is increased
above the range of about 0.1 wt. % to 0.2 wt. % and the inventors hereof have found
this principle is generally true in fuel economy additives technology, i.e., increasing
the amount of friction modifier additive does not result in a concomitant straight
line proportional increase in the observed fuel economy. For example, combining the
glycerol oleate mixed esters described above with a known fuel economy additive such
as a dimerized linoleic acid ester as described in U.S. Patent 4,105,571 has been
found to offer no better fuel economy than when either compound is used alone. This
will be demonstrated in Example 6. Thus, as a general rule increasing the treat level
of the friction modifier itself or increasing the treat level by adding another friction
modifier known to have fuel economy benefits has not heretofore been found to offer
a fuel economy improvement. Examples 1-4 and 6 are presented here to illustrate these
principles.
EXAMPLE 4
[0035] Evaluation of Copper Compounds for Fuel Economy
[0036] The LEFET test was carried out using an Oil
* equivalent to the HR straight grade oil of Example 1 except that 0.3 wt. % of a 40
wt% solution of copper oleate in mineral oil, which is equivalent to 120 ppm copper
was used in place of the anti- oxidant reported in Example 1. The LEFET results for
this test are below in Table IV:

[0037] This example establishes that copper does provide a significant fuel economy credit
in addition to its antioxidant effectiveness.
[0038] The foregoing examples, carried out in fired engine tests using a 5.0 liter 8-cylinder
engine demonstrate that the oil-soluble organic copper compounds offer a beneficial
fuel economy credit and that the glycerol ester offers a fuel economy credit which
does not increase to any significant degree above the 0.2 wt. % treat level.
EXAMPLE 5 - Evaluation of Combination of Copper Compound and Glycerol Ester
[0039] To determine if oils containing both the oil-soluble organic copper compound and
glycerol ester friction modifier would exhibit any complementary effect, different
oils were formulated and tested in Ford 2.3 liter 4-cylinder engine. The purpose of
these tests was to evaluate the increase in fuel economy credits when the copper compound
and the glycerol ester were combined over the credits obtained with these additives
separately in the same engine. Fuel economy credit values will vary among engines
of differing sizes. This is due to the inherent differences in engine design and operating
conditions. It is known therefore that the values for a 2.3 liter 4-cylinder engine
will be lower than fuel economy credit values for a 5 liter 8-cylinder used in these
examples.
[0040] The additive content in weight percent of the oils evaluated is given below, balance
is basestock mineral oil.

[0041] Fuel economy results for these oils are given in Table V below. Percentage credits
are calculated again with respect to the same reference oil used in Example 1.

[0042] Oil D represents the advantage of this invention. Oils B, C, E show the maximum values
one can expect to obtain based on the credits due only to the copper compound. Oil
D, however, achieves a value of 0.9%. This result is not expected because it is known,
as a general principle, that merely increasing the treatment level of a given fuel
economy additive does not increase the credit obtained.
EXAMPLE 6
[0043] To demonstrate the principle that fuel economy additives, when combined together,
cannot be expected to have a combined effect. The following oils G,
H, I and J were evaluated for fuel economy in the 5.0 L engine using the same LEFET
procedure of Example I. Oil G was a formulated lubricating oil having 4 wt% dispersant,
1 wt% overbased metal sulfonate, 1.5 wt% antioxidant and 2 wt% anti-wear additive.
Oil
H was the same as Oil
G, except for the inclusion of 0.1 wt% dimerized linoleic acid ester of diethylene
glycol as disclosed in U.S. Patent 4, 105, 571. Oil I was the same as Oil G except
0.2 wt% of the GMO/GDO ester was added. Oil J was the same as Oil G except both 0.1
wt% of the dimerized linoleic acid ester and 0.2 wt% of the GMO/GDO were added. Fuel
economy results for these four oils are shown below in Table V
I.

EXAMPLE 7
[0044] The positive effect on fuel economy attributable to use of the two component fuel
economy additive of this invention is further demonstrated by LEFET results in the
5.0 L engine and these data confirm the results shown above in Example 5. Here Oil
K contained 5.5 wt% dispersant, 1 wt% overbased metal sulfonate, 1.4 wt% anti-wear
additive and 1 wt% anti-oxidant. Oil L was the same as Oil K with .0.3 wt% of a 40
wt% solution of copper oleate (120 ppm copper) included and Oil M was the same as
Oil L except 0.1 wt% of the GMO/GDO glycerol oleate was included. Fuel economy credits
are in Table VII below.

1. A lubricating oil composition comprising a major amount of an oil of a lubricating
viscosity which has incorporated therein (a) from about 0.05 to about 0.20 weight
percent of a glycerol partial ester or mixtures thereof of a C16-C18 fatty acid, and (b) about 5 to 500 ppm of copper in the form of an oil-soluble organic
copper compound, said (a) and (b) components exhibiting a combined effect improving
the fuel economy of an internal combustion engine.
2. The composition of claim 1 wherein the fatty acid is oleic acid.
3. The composition of claim 1 wherein said partial ester is a mixture of glycerol
monooleate and glycerol dioleate.
4. The composition of claims 1-3 wherein there is present 0.1 to 0.2 weight percent
of said partial ester.
5. The composition of claims 1-4 wherein said lubricating oil composition contains
an ashless dispersant, a metal detergent additive and a zinc dihydrocarbyl dithiophosphate
anti-wear additive in conventional amounts to provide their normal attendant functions.
6. The composition of claim 5 wherein said lubricating oil composition contains a
viscosity index improver.
7. The composition of claims 1-6 where said copper compound is copper oleate.
8. The composition of claims 1-7 where there is present 60 to 200 ppm of copper.
9. A method of improving the fuel economy of an internal combustion engine by lubricating
the internal portion thereof with a lubricating oil composition containing (a) 0.05
to 0.2 wt % of a glycerol partial ester of a C16-C18 fatty acid or mixtures thereof and (b) about 5 to 500 ppm of copper in the form of
an oil-soluble organic copper compound, said (a) and (b) components exhibiting a combined
effect in improving the fuel economy of said engine.
10. The method of claim 9 wherein said (a) component is a mixture of glycerol monooleate
and glycerol dioleate present in an amount of from 0.1 to 0.2 wt %, and said (b) component
is copper oleate present in an amount to provide 60 to 200 ppm copper.
11. The use as an additive for lubricating oil of a mixture of (A) a glycerol partial
ester or mixtures thereof of a C15-C18 fatty acid, and (B) an oil-soluble organic copper compound.