TECHNICAL FIELD
[0001] Tne present invention relates to athletic shoes, and in particular, to a heel counter
reinforcement used with athletic shoes.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] The modern athletic shoe is a highly refined combination of many elements which have
specific functions, all of which must work together for the support and protection
of the foot during an athletic event. The shoe is divided into two general parts,
an upper and a sole. The upper is designed to snugly and comfortably enclose the foot.
Typically, it will have several layers including a weather- and wear-resistant outer
layer of leather or synthetic material such as nylon, and a soft, padded inner liner
for foot comfort. Current uppers typically have an intermediate layer of a synthetic
foamed material. The three layers of the upper may be fastened together by stitching,
gluing, or a combination of these. In areas of maximum wear or stress, reinforcements
of leather and/or plastic are attached to the upper. Examples of such reinforcements
are leather toe sections attached over synthetic inner layers in the toe area and
heel counters made of an inner layer of plastic and an outer layer of leather.
[0003] The other major portion of the athletic shoe is the sole. Designed to withstand many
miles of running, it must have an extremely durable bottom surface to contact the
ground. However, since such contact may be made with considerable force, protection
of the foot and leg demands that the sole also perform a shock-absorbing function.
It therefore typically includes a resilient, energy-absorbing material as a mi
dsole in addition to the durable lower surface, i.e., the outsole. This is particularly
true for training or jogging shoes designed to be used over long distances and over
a long period of time.
[0004] The normal motion of the foot of a typical runner during running proceeds as follows.
First, the heel strikes the ground, then the ball of the foot. As the heel leaves
the ground, the foot rolls forward so that the toes next make contact, and finally
the entire foot leaves the ground to begin another cycle. During the time that the
foot is in contact with the ground, it typically is rolling from the outside, or lateral
side, to the inside, or medial side, a process called pronation. That is, normally,
the outside of the heel strikes first, and the toes on the inside of the foot leave
the ground last. While the foot is airborne and preparing for another cycle, the opposite
process, called supination, occurs. Pronation, the inward roll of the foot in contact
with the ground, although normal, can be a potential source of foot and leg injury,
particularly if it is excessive. The counter, i.e., the relatively stiff plastic material
which gives form to the upper in the area of the heel, can provide a degree of heel
stability and control pronation. However, such plastic counters tend to weaken after
a period of use with the result that the heel stability and pronation control function
of the counter deteriorates.
[0005] The prior art has attempted to solve the pronation problem in a
'number of ways. One example of a prior art device directed to the problem of pronation
is Norton U.S. Patent No. 4,288,929. The Norton '929 patent describes a "motion control
device" which is placed between the upper and the sole at the rear of an athletic
shoe. This control device includes a flat base extending under the heel of the upper
and a wall rising from the edge of the flat base and surrounding a portion of the
heel. In one embodiment the base extends completely between the lateral and medial
walls, while in another embodiment a slot and cutout extend longitudinally through
the base. This motion control device, composed of a yieldable but relatively sturdy
material, is intended to introduce a degree of resistance or rigidity to oppose the
normal pronation of the foot. The device is thus relatively heavy and rigid.
[0006] Furthermore, there is a degree of coupling between motion on the medial and lateral
sides of the heel, particularly in the embodiment where the base extends completely
between the lateral and medial sides. Also, the natural expansion and compression
of the sides of the shoe during running are restrained to a degree by such a relatively
heavy and rigid motion control device.
[0007] In another prior art shoe, heel stability is enhanced by placing a wedge shaped bead
of resilient material about the perimeter of the heel between the upper surface of
a resilient midsole layer and the upper. The bead provides additional support for
the heel counter along its area of maximum stress to alleviate the problem of premature
fatigue of the counter.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0008] An athletic shoe in accordance with the present invention includes a shoe upper having
an outer surface and an inner surface. A counter is attached to the upper in the area
around the heel for providing form to the upper in the area around the heel and for
providing a degree of stability to the heel of the wearer of the shoe during running.
A sole is secured to the upper. The sole includes an outer sole layer for contacting
the ground during running and a resilient cushioning midsole layer secured between
the upper and the outer sole layer. A generally U-shaped heel counter reinforcement
member of resilient material is attached to the shoe and extends from the lateral
side of the shoe around the back of the heel to the medial side. The reinforcement
member has generally vertically extending wall and a horizontally extending mounting
flange. The mounting flange is attached to the midsole layer. The vertical wall has
an upper portion overlapping a portion of the side of the upper for providing lateral
support for the upper, and a lower portion overlapping a portion of the side of the
midsole layer for cooperating with the midsole layer to resist lateral rolling motion
of the heel during foot strike.
[0009] A shoe in accordance with the present invention also includes a heel counter located
about the heel area of the upper. The heel counter is formed of a relatively stiff
material and is designed to give permanent form to the upper about the heel and to
provide a degree of heel control or stability and, thus, to reduce the tendency of
pronation.
[0010] In the preferred embodiment of the present invention, the medial side of the U-shaped
heel counter reinforcement is longer than the lateral side and has a higher wall.
This increases control over the rolling of the heel on the side where control is most
needed.
[0011] The heel counter reinforcement is made of a relatively stiff yet flexible material
to exert a degree of control over rolling of the heel, yet also to allow some freedom
of motion. The flange, fastened between the shoe upper and the sole, anchors the heel
counter reinforcement member to the shoe. As the upper rolls to one side, it presses
against the wall of the heel counter reinforcement member; and this force is transmitted
to the lower portion of the wall, which overlaps on the midsole. The lower portion
of the wall presses into the midsole layer to provide a resistance force to further
rolling motion.
[0012] The present invention seeks to enhance control of pronation during running. This
is accomplished by the use of the reinforcement member which is light in weight, inexpensive,
and yet constructed so that motion other than pronation is not unnecessarily restricted
by it. Due to its shape and placement, the reinforcement member cooperates with the
heel counter and a cushioning midsole in such a manner that the stress on the counter
is relieved and the durability of the counter is prolonged, so that the tendency of
the counter to hinder pronation is both prolonged and enhanced. Because, during pronation,
the foot rolls from the lateral ,to the medial side, the reinforcement member extends
further forward on the medial side to present increased resistance to the roll of
the foot on the medial side of the shoe. Because of its relatively small size and
its cooperation with the midsole layer, the reinforcement member enhances control
of pronation and at the same time accommodates the compressive and expansive flexing
of the sides of the shoe upper.
[0013] The upper has the specific function of providing a lightweight, comfortable, protective
enclosure for the foot during running. To this end, it may be constructed with several
layers, for example, an inner layer of soft, ventilating, knitted nylon, an intermediate
cushioning layer of foam rubber, and an outer protective layer of closely woven nylon.
At points of greater wear or where increased protection or stiffness are required,
such as the front of the toe and the lateral side of the upper, a layer of leather
may be fastened to the outside of the upper by gluing or sewing.
[0014] The functions of the sole are to resist wear during ground contact and to withstand
the forces developed when the foot strikes the ground, cushioning the foot and protecting
the runner from injury and fatigue. The sole also provides a broad, stable base to
support the foot during ground contact. It generally has a relatively hard lower outsole
layer with a contoured bottom surface to increase traction, and a relatively flexible
and energy-absorbing midsole layer, to which the shoe upper is attached, to cushion
the foot and absorb the shock produced when it strikes the ground. For increased stability,
the bottom surface of the sole is made somewhat wider than the foot; and, the midsole
layer of the sole is then tapered inward toward the top so that its width at the point
where it is fastened to the shoe upper is approximately the same as the width of the
shoe upper at that point. A wedge-shaped sole is therefore formed, with its base wider
than its top and sides which slant inward from bottom to top.
[0015] Various advantages and features of novelty which characterize the invention are pointed
out with particularity in the claims annexed hereto and forming a part hereof. However,
for a better understanding of the invention, its advantages, and objects attained
by its use, reference should be had to the drawings which form a further part hereof
and to the accompanying descriptive matter in which there is illustrated and described
the preferred embodiment of the invention.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0016]
Figure 1 is a perspective view showing an athletic shoe in accordance with the present
invention with the heel counter reinforcement in place.
Figure 2 is a sectional view, on an enlarged scale, of the athletic shoe of Figure
1, taken generally along lines 2-2 of that figure.
Figure 3 is a top plan view of the heel counter reinforcement of the present invention
showing the position occupies in relation to an athletic shoe.
Figure 4 is a sectional view, taken generally along line 4-4 of Figure 3.
Figure 5 is a sectional view, taken generally along line 5-5 of Figure 3.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0017] Referring to the drawings in detail, wherein like numerals indicate like elements,
there is shown in Figure 1 an athletic shoe in accordance with the present invention
and designated generally as 10. A shoe upper 12 extends completely around the foot
and includes provisions for lacing 14. Upper 12 may have one or more reinforced portions
16, 17 and 19 at areas of high stress in which leather or some other durable material
is sewn to the outside of the upper 12. Reinforced portion 19 is in the form of a
conventional heel counter including an inner layer 21 of a relatively stiff material,
such as hard plastic and an outer cover layer 23 of leather. Upper 12 preferably includes
an inner liner 27, an intermediate layer 29 of a foam cushioning material and an outer
layer 31 of a tightly woven synthetic material. Three layer uppers are illustrated
in U.S. Patents Nos. 3,793,750 and 4,255,876.
[0018] Attached to the bottom of upper 12 by a conventional method is a sole 18, comprised
generally of at least two layers including an outsole layer 20 and a midsole layer
22. The outsole layer 20 is contoured on its bottom surface to increase traction.
It is composed of a relatively hard resilient material so that it will wear well through
repeated ground contact. The midsole layer 22 need not be as hard, but should be resilient
and cushioning to absorb the shocks of running so the foot and leg are protected.
Thus, midsole layer 22 is preferably formed of a cushioning resilient material, such
as EVA, foamed polyurethane or an encapsulated air cushion, with a hardness preferably
in the range of 20 to 55 durometer on the Shore A scale.
[0019] Referring now to Figure 2, the relation of a heel counter reinforcement 24 to the
shoe upper 12 and the sole 18 is more clearly shown. At the rear of the shoe, the
heel counter reinforcement 24 is fastened between the upper 12 and the midsole layer
22. Heel counter reinforcement 24 has a generally U-shaped configuration in plan view
with a generally horizontal support or mounting flange 28 and a generally vertical
wall 26. Vertical wall 26 is formed integral with flange 28, and has an upper portion
33 extending generally vertically upward from the outer edge of flange 28 and a lower
portion 35 extending generally vertically downward from the outer edge of flange 28.
The horizontal flange 28 extends between a lower surface of upper 12 and an upper
surface of midsole 22. Flange 28 is fastened in place preferably by glue to midsole
22 with upper 12 being glued above flange 28. The inwardly facing surface of the upper
portion 33 of vertical wall 26 is also preferably attached to the outer surface of
upper 12 by glue. In this manner, heel counter reinforcement 24 is attached to shoe
10. Vertical wall 26 extends substantially vertically, i.e. not precisely vertically,
so that it follows the upward extent of the heel area of the upper. The bottom of
midsole layer 22 is somewhat wider than its top; consequently, it is necessary for
the sides 32 of the sole to slant inward from the bottom to top. The inner surface
of lower surface of lower portion 35 of vertical wall 26 is sloped to approximately
match the slant of midsole layer 22. Heel counter reinforcement 24 cooperates with
counter 19 and midsole 22 to control pronation.
[0020] As was mentioned in the background of the invention, heel counter 19 provides a degree
of heel control, which in turn controls pronation. However, over a period of time
a typical heel counter weakens so that the degree of heel control lessens. Dependent
upon the material used to make the counter, weakening can occur after as little as
100 miles of running. The heel counter reinforcement 24 of the present invention lengthens
the time over which the heel counter effectively provides heel control to thereby
enhance the overall heel stability function of the shoe. Heel counter reinforcement
24 accomplishes this in a lightweight or efficient manner because of its particular
location, size, shape and hardness, and the manner in which it interacts with the
heel counter 19 and midsole layer 22.
[0021] Upper portion 33 of wall 26 extends around heel counter 19 along its area of maximum
stress during running. This upper portion 33 thus provides reinforcement in the area
of maximum stress. Stress on counter 19 is additionally relieved by the interaction
of lower portion 35 of wall 26 with midsole layer 22.
[0022] During running, the foot exerts forces on the shoe illustrated by Fm and Fl in Figure
5, where m denotes the medial side of the shoe and I the lateral side. As one of these
forces, Fm for example, is exerted on the shoe it is transmitted to the upper portion
33 of wall 26 of heel counter reinforcement 24, which because of its mass provides
some resistance to the force Fm. Force Fm is also transmitted to lower portion 35
of vertical wall 26. The force transmitted to lower portion 35 of wall 26 is resisted
by the side 32 of midsole layer 22 on which it rests. A lower portion 35 of 1/8 of
an inch height has been found sufficient for this purpose. Sideward and downward force
Fm is therefore controlled by a number of elements and their interaction with one
another, i.e., the relatively stiff counter 19, the upper portion 33 of wall 26 and
the interaction of lower portion 35 of heel counter reinforcement 24 with midsole
layer 24. The heel counter reinforcement 24 operates in a similar manner on the lateral
side of the shoe when the foot exerts a force illustrated by FI in Figure 5. This
interaction resists forces Fm, Fl, so that the amount of flexure of the counter is
reduced to thereby reduce the stress on or tendency to breakdown of counter 19.
[0023] Referring now to Figures 3-5, various features of the preferred embodiment of the
invention are illustrated. Because the foot rolls from the lateral to the medial side
during ground contact in running, more control is appropriate on the medial side.
In the preferred embodiment of the present invention, heel counter reinforcement 24
extends farther forward along the medial side of the shoe than along the lateral side.
Medial wall 26 , including upper and lower portions 33, 35 and medial flange 28
m are longer than the corresponding, lateral parts; 26
1 and 28
1. For example, the distance "C" of approximately 3-1/8 inches between the rearmost
inner surface of reinforcement 24 and the front edge of wall 26
m, and a distance "D" of approximately 2-7/16 inches between the rearmost inner surface
of reinforcement 24 and the front edge of side wall 28
1 has been found suitable for average size men's shoes. The additional length of heel
counter reinforcement 24 on the medial side provides increased resistance to the roll
motion of the foot on that side. In Figure 3, the arch, i.e., generally the portion
of the shoe which curves inward at the boundary between sole and upper, of the shoe
is indicated by numeral 36. The beginning of the inward curve, the beginning 38 of
the arch 36, is shown as a preferred approximate forward limit of the medial portion
of heel counter reinforcement 24.
[0024] An additional feature of the preferred embodiment of the present invention is shown
in Figure 4. Most of the wall 26 of heel counter reinforcement 24 has a height H above
the top of the flange 28. In order to provide additional control of the rolling motion
of the foot on the medial side, the wall 26
m on that side is made slightly higher, a height shown as H' in Figure 4. Figure 5
also illustrates the difference between the height of medial wall 26
m and lateral wall 26
1. A height differential of approximately 1/16 of an inch between heights H and H',
wherein the height H is approximately 3/8 of an inch, has been found acceptable.
[0025] Another feature of the preferred embodiment of heel counter reinforcement 24 is its
combination of flexibility with control. By making the flange 28 relatively narrow,
for example, slightly greater than 1/2 of an inch, by introducing into it radial notches
34, and by keeping it relatively thin, for example 0.02 to 0.04 inch, heel counter
reinforcement 24 can be made flexible enough so that it does not unduly restrain the
foot. Notches 34 are placed in the curved rear portion of flange 28 and are oriented
approximately toward the center point P of the curved portion of the heel counter
reinforcement, hence the term "radial" notches. Of the total width A of the widest
point of the heel of the shoe upper 12, the width B of flange 28 should be only a
small portion in order to preserve the flexibility of the heel counter reinforcement
24. It has been found that if the width B of flange 28 is no greater than 1/4 of the
width A of the widest point of the heel of the shoe upper, the necessary flexibility
will exist. The two sides of the heel counter reinforcement 24 act independently of
each other when differential vertical forces are applied to them. Thus, there is virtually
no coupling between vertical motions on the lateral and medial sides of the heel caused
by reinforcement 24.
[0026] Frequently during running forces Fm and FI (see Figure 5) will be exerted simultaneously
because of the expansion of the foot in both the medial and lateral directions during
foot strike. It is desirable that this natural expansion of the foot not be unnecessarily
restricted, and the heel counter reinforcement of the present invention is able to
allow this to occur. That is, the previously-described features of the heel counter
reinforcement which make it more flexible also accommodate the compressive and expansive
flexing of the sides of the shoe upper.
[0027] By forming notches 34 in flange 28 and by keeping the width of the flange as small
as possible, the weight of the heel counter reinforcement 24 can be minimized. Another
way to minimize the weight of the heel counter reinforcement is to make it from a
lightweight material. The material must also be relatively stiff to perform the heel
counter reinforcement's function of transmitting and resisting forces, and yet flexible
enough to allow the foot to move comfortably. Materials within a hardness in the range
of 60 to 90 durometer on the Shore A scale have been found to meet these criteria.
Polyurethane of 80 Shore A durometer hardness has been found particularly suitable.
[0028] Numerous characteristics and advantages of the invention have been set forth in the
foregoing description, together with details of the structure and function of the
invention, and the novel features thereof are pointed out in the appended claims.
The disclosure, however, is illustrative only, and changes may be made in detail,
especially in matters of shape, size, and arrangement of parts, within the principle
of the invention to the full extent indicated by the broad general meaning of the
terms in which the appended claims are expressed. For example, although the heel counter
reinforcement has been illustrated in the context of a shoe made to fit the right
foot, the present invention is equally applicable to both left and right shoes. Heel
counter reinforcements for both shoes would be mirror images of each other.
1. In an athletic shoe having a shoe upper, a counter attached to the shoe upper in
the area of the heel, and a shoe sole attached to the bottom of the shoe upper, said
shoe sole including a layer of cushioning resilient material between the ground contacting
surface of the shoe sole and the upper, a heel counter reinforcement fastened between
the shoe upper and the shoe sole at the rear and sides of the heel of the athletic
shoe to provide sideward support for the counter, said heel counter reinforcement
comprising:
a generally U-shaped member of resilient material having a substantially vertical
wall and a substantially horizontal flange, both said wall and flange surrounding
a portion of rear and sides of the shoe upper, said horizontal flange extending inward
from an inner vertical surface of said vertical wall and being attached to said shoe,
said vertical wall including an upper portion and a lower portion, said upper portion
extending upward from said flange and surrounding a portion of the counter to reinforce
the counter, said lower portion extending downward from said flange and overlapping
a portion of the side of the shoe sole to cooperate with the sole to inhibit sideward
rolling of the foot during foot strike.
2. An athletic shoe comprising:
a shoe upper having an outer surface and an inner surface;
a counter attached to said upper in the area around the heel for providing form to
the upper in the area around the heel and for providing a degree of stability to the
heel of a wearer of the shoe during running;
a sole secured to said upper, said sole including an outer sole layer for contacting
the ground during running and resilient cushioning midsole layer secured between said
upper and said outer sole layer; and
a generally U-shaped heel counter reinforcement member of a resilient material attached
to said shoe and extending from the lateral side of said shoe around the back of the
heel to the medial side, said reinforcement member having a generally vertically extending
wall and a generally horizontally extending mounting flange, said mounting flange
being attached to said midsole layer; and
said vertical wall having an upper portion overlapping a portion of a side of said
upper to provide lateral support for said counter and upper and a lower portion overlapping
a portion of a side of said midsole layer for cooperating with said midsole layer
to resist lateral rolling motion of the heel during foot strike.
3. An athletic shoe as claimed in claim 2 wherein said heel counter reinforcement
member is formed of a resilient material within the hardness range of approximately
60 to 90 durometer on a Shore A scale.
4. An athletic shoe as claimed in claim 2 or 3 wherein said vertical wall extends
forward to approximately the arch area on the medial side of the shoe.
5. An athletic shoe as claimed in claim 2 wherein said upper portion of said vertical
wall has a maximum height on the medial side of the shoe.
6. An athletic shoe in accordance with claim 5 wherein said maximum height of said
vertical wall above said mounting flange is approximately 7/16 of an inch and the
average height of said vertical wall along the rear and lateral sides of said reinforcement
member is approximately 3/8 of an inch.
7. An athletic shoe in accordance with claim 2 wherein said lower portion of said
vertical wall has a height of approximately 1/8 of an inch.
8. An athletic shoe as claimed in claim 2 wherein said outer sole layer is contoured
to increase traction.
9. An athletic shoe as claimed in claim 2 wherein the width of said flange is no greater
than one-quarter of the maximum width of the heel of the shoe upper.
10. An athletic shoe as claimed in claim 9 wherein said flange contains a plurality
of radial notches to increase the flexibility of said flange.
11. A athletic shoe comprising:
a shoe upper having an outer surface and an inner surface;
a counter attached to said upper in the area around the rear and lateral and medial
sides of the heel for providing form to the upper in the area around the heel and
for providing a degree of stability to the heel of a wearer of the shoe during running;
a sole secured to said upper, said sole including an outer sole layer of a resilient
wear resistant material for contacting the ground during running and a resilient cushioning
midsole layer secured between said upper and said outer sole layer; and
a generally U-shaped heel counter reinforcement member of a resilient material within
the hardness range of approximately 60 to 90 durometer on a Shore A scale, said reinforcement
member being attached to said shoe and extending from the lateral side of said shoe
adjacent the arch area around the back of the heel to the medial side, said reinforcement
member having a generally vertically extending wall and a generally horizontally extending
mounting flange, said mounting flange being attached to said midsole layer; and
said vertical wall having an upper portion overlapping a portion of a side of said
upper to provide lateral support for said counter and upper and a lower portion overlapping
a portion of a side of said midsole layer for cooperating with said midsole layer
to resist lateral rolling motion of the heel during foot strike, said upper portion
having a maximum height on the medial side of the shoe.
12. An athletic shoe comprising:
a shoe upper having an outer surface and an inner surface;
a counter attached to said upper in the area around the rear and lateral and medial
sides of the heel for providing form to the upper in the area around the heel and
for providing a degree of stability to the heel of a wearer of the shoe during running;
a sole secured to said upper, said sole including an outer sole layer of a resilient
wear resistant material for contacting the ground during running and a resilient cushioning
midsole layer secured between said upper and said outer sole layer; and
a generally U-shaped heel counter reinforcement member of a resilient material within
the hardness range of approximately 60 to 90 durometer on a Shore A scale, said reinforcement
member being attached to said shoe and extending from the lateral side of said shoe
adjacent the arch area around the back of the heel to the medial side, said reinforcement
member having a generally vertically extending wall and a generally horizontally extending
mounting flange, said flange having a width less than one-quarter of the maximum width
of the heel of the shoe upper, said mounting flange being attached to said midsole
layer; and
said vertical wall having an upper portion overlapping a portion of a side of said
upper to provide lateral support for said counter and upper and a lower portion overlapping
a portion of a side of said midsole layer for cooperating with said midsole layer
to resist lateral rolling motion of the heel during foot strike, said upper portion
having a maximum height of approximately 7/8 of an inch on the medial side of the
shoe, and said lower portion having a height of approximately 1/8 of an inch.