[0001] This invention relates to a method and apparatus for inducing nuclear beta decay
transitions that are normally inhibited by angular momentum or parity considerations.
[0002] According to one aspect of this invention a method of inducing nuclear beta decay
transitions comprises providing a medium which includes atomic nuclei that have forbidden
beta decay transitions in which the initial and final nuclear states do not have the
same intrinsic pairty or have total angular momenta which differ by more than one
quantum unit of angular momentum, and applying to the medium an electromagnetic field
which has an intensity sufficient to provide the angular momentum or intrinsic parity
necessary to overcome the forbiddenness of the beta decay transitions of the atomic
nuclei, thereby to induce the beta decay transitions.
[0003] According to another aspect of this invention an apparatus for inducing beta decay
transitions comprises a medium which includes atomic nuclei that have forbidden beta
decay transitions in which the initial and final nuclear states do not have the same
intrinsic parity or have total angular momenta which differ by more than one quantum
unit of angular momentum, field producing means for producing an electromagnetic field
in the medium and means for energising the field producing means to establish the
field at an intensity sufficient to provide the angular momentum or intrinsic parity
necessary to overcome the forbiddenness of the beta decay transitions of the atomic
nuclei.
[0004] The energy released in these induced nuclear transitions is useful for the controlled
production of power. The induced beta decay transitions are also useful to reduce
the halflives of long-lived fission product wastes from conventional nuclear fission
power plants.
[0005] The background leading to this invention, theoretical predictions and practical examples
will now be described and explained.
I. BACKGROUND AND FOUNDATIONS OF THE INVENTION
A. Introduction and Prior Art.
[0006] There is little history of work on causing changes in the rates of beta radioactivity.
The common understanding is that it is an immutable natural process. There are two
theoretical treatments of the influence on beta decay of extremely intense constant
magnetic fields.
1/ These studies conclude that there would be essentially no effects for fields up to
about 10 12 G, but above about 10 13 G beta decay rates would be increased noticeably.
The problem is that the largest field that can be produced in the laboratory at present
is about 10
6G.
[0007] The work just cited is of interest in an astrophysical context. Another astrophysical
treatment of beta decay modification treats photon effects on beta decay in a stellar
interior. The mechanism is one in which the photon produces a virtual electron-positron
pair, with the positron being absorbed by the nucleus in lieu of beta-particle emission.
2/ The process can become of importance at temperatures of the order of 10
8 K.
[0008] The present invention involves induced emission from a certain type of metastable
nuclear state. There is precedent for this in atomic physics. The 2s state of the
hydrogen atom is metastable; but it can be induced to decay to the Is ground state
by a nonresonant electromagnetic field. The emission occurs with at least one photon
of inducing field type, plus another photon carrying the remaining energy of the 2s-ls
energy level difference. The theory for this process was given by Zernik
3/ for a first order process in the inducing field. The theory of arbitrarily high order
processes involving a low frequency inducing field has also been developed.
4,5/ Experimental verification of the lowest order induced process in hydrogen has been
accomplished.-- This invention is conceptually closely akin to this atomic work in
that an externally applied electromagnetic field permits a relaxation of the conservation
conditions that cause the metastability of the system with no field present. It differs
from the atomic analogue in that the metastable state is nuclear, rather than atomic;
the metastability is against emission of beta particles and neutrinos, rather than
photons; and the emitted radiation therefore consists of a mixture of beta particles,
neutrinos, and photons, rather than photons only.
B. Qualitative Effects of the Applied Field.
[0009] The present invention relates to the production of nuclear energy by the process
of induced beta radioactivity. (One could use the words "stimulated" or "accelerated"
rather than "induced." However, the word "stimulated" is suggestive of laser physics,
where the stimulating radiation is resonant with an atomic or molecular transition,
so that the stimulated radiation and stimulating radiation are of the same type. The
word "accelerated" might be more acceptable, although it seems inappropriate in those
cases where the nuclear species in question exhibits no radioactivity at all when
not subjected to inducing radiation.) A number of nuclear species exist having real
or potential beta decay transitions classed as "forbidden." The term "forbidden" is
used in beta decay physics, not as an absolute term, but to indicate that the transition
is strongly inhibited. Such species therefore have very long halflives. It is the
basic purpose and objective of the present invention to induce the beta decay of such
species so as to materially reduce their halflives. With nuclides which normally exhibit
beta decay, this would lead to an increased rate of release of energy. In like fashion,
those nuclides which only have a potential beta decay can be induced to release that
energy. In either case, these species would be useful fuel for the controlled production
of power. In addition, since certain radioactive by-products or wastes of nuclear
fission power plants have long halflives because of their property of beta decay forbiddenness,
the present invention, when applied to these materials, would afford the advantage
of rapidly converting such wastes to nonradioactive species. At the same time, useful
energy could be extracted therefrom.
[0010] It is recognized in nuclear physics that beta decay transitions are unimpeded when
the initial and final nuclear states have the same intrinsic parity and have total
angular momenta which are either the same or differ by one quantum unit of angular
momentum. These beta decays are categorized as "allowed." On the other hand, beta
decay transitions are inhibited when the initial and final nuclear states either do
not have the same intrinsic parity, or have total angular momenta which differ by
more than one quantum unit of angular momentum. These beta decays are categorized
as "forbidden." Forbiddenness has a very strong influence on the observed halflife.
For example, strontium-90 (one of the wastes of nuclear fission power plants) has
a halflife for beta decay of 28.6 years, because the initial and final nuclear states
have an angular momentum difference of two units, and have opposite parity. By contrast,
strontium-92 beta decays with a halflife of only 2.7 hours. The two nuclei have very
similar nuclear parameters for beta decay, the primary difference being that an allowed
decay exists for strontium-92, but not for strontium-90. The degree of forbiddenness
varies for different nuclides. Whereas strontium-90 represents a type of "first forbidden"
decay, calcium-48 is an example of a "fourth forbidden" decay. In fact, calcium-48
is not observed ever to undergo beta decay, even though it is possible by every conservation
rule other than angular momentum. Other nuclei with parameters similar to those for
calcium-48, but with an allowed beta decay open to them, have beta decay halflives
of the order of forty days.
[0011] In accordance with the present invention, forbidden beta decay transitions are rendered
allowed. This result is accomplished by employing an externally applied electromagnetic
field to serve as a reservoir of angular momentum and parity to remove forbiddenness
from the beta decay. The necessity for having an electromagnetic interaction in the
beta decay in addition to the usual beta decay interaction invokes a penalty in the
halflife expected. That is, the halflife for a beta decay induced by an electromagnetic
field can never be as short as the halflife for an otherwise comparable allowed transition.
Nevertheless, the halflife shortening possible through the intercession of an electromagnetic
field in a forbidden decay can be very striking.
[0012] To explain how an applied electromagnetic field can remove forbiddenness from beta
decay, it is convenient to introduce the concept of photons. (A photon is the basic
elementary particle of the electromagnetic field. The fields considered here are coherent
fields involving a superposition of different types of photons, so a photon representation
is not suitable for practical calculation. Nevertheless, the photon provides a simple
conceptual notion of how forbiddenness is removed.) Each photon of the electromagnetic
field carries one quantum unit of angular momentum, and has negative intrinsic parity.
(In the language of elementary particle physics, the photon is a pseudovector particle.)
The angular momentum and parity of a photon are independent of the energy carried
by the photon, and since there are no critical energy or momentum conservation conditions
which the photon must satisfy, the choice of the frequency of the applied electromagnetic
field is largely determined by practical considerations about the best way to achieve
certain values of an interaction strength parameter to be discussed below.
[0013] An illustration of the principle involved is provided by the beta decay of
90Sr. The decay scheme for this is
7/
[0014]

The superscript on
90Sr and on its daughter nucleus
90 Y (yttrium-90) indicate the total number of nucleons in the nucleus. The left subscript
shows the number of protons, and the right subscript gives the number of neutrons.
Thus the beta decay of
90 Sr to
90 Y involves the conversion of one of the neutrons in
90Sr into a proton, thus causing a transmutation from strontium to yttrium. (The further
decay of
90 Y into the stable nuclide zirconium -90 is not shown here, since it is not needed
for this discussion.) The horizontal lines show the energy levels of the nuclei. The
O
+ at the left of the line means that this ground-state energy level of
90 Sr has zero angular momentum and positive parity. The 2
- shown for
90Y signifies two units of angular momentum, and negative parity. The opposite parities
of the states, and the need for a change in angular momentum of two units, accounts
for the
28.6-year halflife of
90Sr. In the presence of an applied electromagnetic field, the initial state (
90Sr) or final state (
90Y) can be thought of as emitting or absorbing a photon, with a resulting change in
angular momentum and parity. For example, the ground state of
90Sr in the electromagnetic field would have a 1 component, so that the beta decay could
proceed with a change of only one unit of angular momentum and no parity change, which
is an allowed beta transition. An energy level diagram for this is

where the straight diagonal lines represent beta transitions, and the wavy lines represent
photon absorption or emission. The amount of energy represented by the photon is greatly
exaggerated in this diagram. On the scale of energy set by the difference between
the
90 Sr and
90Y ground states, a photon of the applied field contributes essentially zero energy.
[0015] The result of this interaction with the electromagnetic field is to enhance the transition
rate due to removal of forbiddenness from the beta decay, while accepting some penalty
in the total transition rate due to the introduction of an interaction with the electromagnetic
field. A significant overall increase in the transition rate achieved by application
of the electromagnetic field in accordance with the present invention, has practical
importance from at least two points of view. One is achieving useful power production
from the beta decay of materials which are long-lived when not induced to decay; and
the other is achieving relief from a major aspect of.the problem of disposal of radioactive
wastes arising from nuclear fission power.
C. Illustrative Nuclear Species to which the Invention Applies.
[0016] Some of the nuclear species most useful in the practice of the present invention
will now be considered, and these will be discussed under two principal headings:
those nuclides, found in Nature, most promising for power production; and the beta-active
fission products which present the major burden of radioactive waste disposal, and
which could also contribute to power production.
1. Naturally Occurring Nuclides.
[0017] The nuclear species relevant to this category are
40K (potassium-4
0),
48Ca (calcium-
48),
50v (vanadium-50),
87Rb (rubidium-
87),
96Zr (zirconium-96),
113Cd (cadmium-
113), and
115In (indium-115). (Other beta decay species found in Nature--
123 Te,
138La
176Lu
180Ta
197Re--will not be mentioned further, because of small abundance and/or low decay energy).
A striking feature common to all these nuclides is their very long halflives. The
shortest lifetime in the list is possessed by
40K, whose 1.277 x 10
9-year
8/ halflife is about 1/4 the age of the Earth. The halflife of
87Rb,
4.
80 x 10
10 years,
9/ is more than ten times the age of the Earth. The other nuclei bracket the threshold
of detectability.
115In is listed at 4.
41 x 1014 years.
10/ The decay of
113Cd (
halfli
fe 9.
3 x 1015 years
11/) was detected for the first time only recently.
12/ 48Ca,
50V and
96Zr have never been observed to decay, even though it is possible in principle, and
nuclear data compilations give only a lower limit for their halflives.
[0018] A feature of those materials which decay in a single stage of beta emission is related
to the safety of power reactors with such fuels. The enhanced beta activity of the
fuel requires the establishment of precisely the correct conditions within the reactor.
If the reactor malfunctions, the beta decay enhancement is interrupted, and the fuel
immediately reverts to the near-zero radioactivity of its normal state. There is no
possibility of a runaway reaction. Furthermore, there is neither induced nor residual
radioactivity to deal with upon shutdown. Even if some mechanical accident should
breach the integrity of the reactor, any fuel or waste products which might escape
are as innocuous as the original charge of fuel. The situation is not quite as straightforward
with 48Ca and
96 Zr which experience a spontaneous beta decay following the induced decay. However,
since the spontaneous decays have halflives of the order of one or two days, do not
induce further activity, and emit nothing gaseous, hazards associated with an accident
are minimal. Several weeks delay after an accident would be necessary to permit the
activity to disappear.
[0019] Some of the nuclides considered here experience only beta decay, with no.associated
gamma emission. A feature of such a pure beta decay energy source is the prospect
of direct generation of electrical energy. Essentially all of the energy in a pure
beta decay appears in the charged beta particle, and in a neutral neutrino or antineutrino
(with a trivial amount appearing in nuclear recoil). The neutrino energy is irretrievably
lost, but if the kinetic energy of the beta particle is used to carry it to a collector
separate from the fuel, the consequence is a separation of charge. This separation
of charge creates an electric potential difference which can cause electrical current
to flow.
[0020] The beta decay properties of
40K will now be discussed. The natural decay of
40K exhibits all the types of beta activity. Its beta decay can be represented by the
following energy level diagram, adapted from Endt and Van der Leun.
8/

[0021] The horizontal line for
40 K is the ground state, with a spin and parity of 4 . The line slanting down to the
right signifies a β
- decay to the 0
+ ground state of
40Ca (calcium-40). This decay arises from the conversion of one of the neutrons in
40K into a proton, which is the reaction

[0022] The three emergent particles from the reaction are the proton, electron (or β
- particle) and the antineutrino, ν. The antineutrino has such infinitesimally small
probability of interaction with anything, that its primary importance in practical
application is that it carries away, and thus "wastes," about half of the energy released
in the beta decay. The 1.312 MeV of kinetic energy shown in the diagram for the β
- decay thus over states, by a factor of about two, the average energy retrievable
from the process. The 4 to 0
+ transition is called "unique third forbidden."
[0023] The line in the
40K level diagram slanting down to the left represents the capture of an atomic electron
by the nucleus, leading to the first excited state of 40 Ar (argon-40). This EC (electron
capture) is equivalent to the conversion of one of the protons in 40K into a neutron,
or
[0024]

The reaction is placed in quotation marks to emphasize the fact that such a reaction
is energetically impossible with free protons and electrons, but can become possible
within an appropriate nucleus. The symbols on the right hand side is a neutrino, the
antiparticle of the antineutrino of β
- decay. The 4 to 2
+ transition, "unique first forbidden," would be the dominant decay mode of
40K since it is so much less forbidden than 4 to 0
+, were it not for the very small transition energy involved in the EC decay--only
44 keV as compared to 1312 keV for These opposite trends give the result that 89.33%
of the natural decays occur by β
- and 10.67% by EC. Since the EC process leads to an excited state of
40Ar, it is followed quickly by the emission of a 1.46 MeV gamma ray as the newly-formed
argon goes into its ground state.
[0025] The last decay mode shown on the diagram is + decay, which is equivalent to

[0026] Again, the quotation marks are a reminder that this reaction is not energetically
possible for a free proton, but it can occur in certain nuclei. The line in the diagram
showing β
+ decay has a vertical portion followed by a slanted part. The vertical line is an
indicator of an energy equal to the combined rest mass energies of an electron and
a positron (totaling 1.022 MeV) which enters into the energy balance for β
+ decay. Thus the energy available to the positron and neutrino amounts to 1505 keV
less 1022 keV, or only 483 keV. This accounts for the fact that a β
+ transition to the first excited state of 40 Ar is not possible. It is also most of
the reason why the β
+ decay of 40 K is so strongly dominated by the β
- decay, even though both are 4 to 0
+ transitions. (There are other reasons having to do with details of nuclear structure.)
[0027] 48Ca presents new features. It appears to be entirely stable, but β
- decay is energetically possible if a large angular momentum forbiddenness is overcome.
If decay is induced by an electromagnetic field, the daughter nucleus is radioactive
with both β
- (allowed) and gamma emissions.
[0028] For further explanation, the energy level diagram of
48Ca and its (potential) daughter nucleus
48Sc (scandium-48) is useful:
13/
[0029] No beta transition is actually observed from
48Ca, but its ground state is 281 keV above the ground state of
48Sc. The two most probable beta decays shown for
48Sc are allowed, so
48Sc has a halflife of only 43.7 hours. Since the only levels in
48Ti available for allowed transitions from
48Sc are well above the ground state, the beta decay of
48Sc is accompanied by gamma ray emissions of 175 keV (7.5%), 1212 keV (2.4%), 1037
keV (97.5%), 1312 keV (100%), and 984 keV (100%). These gamma ray transitions are
shown by the vertical lines in the
48Ti diagram. The overall energy difference between the ground states of
48Sc and
48Ti is 3.990
MeV. Thus, although the potential beta decay of
48Ca itself is not particularly energetic, the end result of such a decay, when induced,
is the release of a relatively large amount of beta and gamma ray energy.
[0030] The other nuclei under this heading will be discussed more succinctly than were
40K and
48Ca. The 50 next heavier candidate,
50V,
14/ is interesting because it appears to be totally stable in Nature, and because it
is the only case to be listed here in which potential β
+ activity is as significant as β
-.
[0031] Rubidium-87
9/ is interesting because of its comparatively large isotopic abundance (27.85%), and
its relatively great importance in terms of energy resources.
[0032] Zirconium-96
15/ is very similar in nature to
48Ca.
96Zr is apparently non-radioactive, with the beta-active
96Nb (niobium-96) as its daughter nucleus if decay is induced.
96Nb decays to excited states of
g6Mo (molybedenum-96).
[0033] The nearly stable nuclide
113Cd
11/ has a higher degree of forbiddenness than
87Rb, and slightly more available transition energy. The isotopic abundance of
113Cd is 12.26%, but it is less widely distributed in Nature than
87Rb.
[0034] Finally,
115In
10/ has the same forbiddenness in its beta decay as
113Cd, a more energetic β decay, but nearly as long a lifetime. Natural indium is largely
115In (95.7%).
2. Fission Products.
[0035] The second group of nuclides to be examined is the fission products which arise from
the breakup of the fissionable fuel in nuclear reactors. A great many different fission
products occur, but they all share the property of being neutron-rich when they are
created, and so they exhibit decay.
[0036] By far the most important beta decay nuclei from the standpoint of fission reactor
waste disposal are
90Sr (strontium-90) and
137Cs (cesium-137). For the first 700 years or so of natural decay,
90 Sr and
137 Cs comprise virtually the entire burden of fission waste radioactivity.
16/ The reason for this arises only in part from the fact that they are among the most
likely in occurrence in the probability distribution of fission products. More important
is that their beta decays have a moderate degree of forbiddenness. The nuclei with
allowed beta transitions decay with sufficient rapidity that their radioactivity is
significantly depleted during the first year or so of waiting time after spent fuel
rods are removed from the reactor. Nuclei with highly forbidden beta transitions decay
so slowly as to moderate the level of radioactivity they present, although their persistence
is thereby increased. However,
90Sr and
137 Cs both have "unique first forbidden" beta decays (angular momentum change of two,
and change of parity) which give them halflives of the order of thirty years. This
makes temporary storage of little use, and yet the levels of activity are high. It
is also a particularly obnoxious halflife in terms of health hazards, since thirty
years is the order of magnitude of a human lifetime.
90 Sr in particular becomes incorporated in bone when ingested, where it continues to
damage the host organism. The biological halflife (i.e. , the halflife for retention
in humans) of
90Sr is 49 years in bone and 36 years on a whole body basis.
17/
[0037] The decay of
90Sr is to
90Y (yttrium-90), which, in turn, has a first-forbidden, but more energetic decay to
the stable
90Zr nucleus.
7/ Application of an appropriate external field would accelerate both
90Sr and
90Y decays, but the
90Sr decay always remains the controlling factor.
[0038] In the case of 137Cs, decay is directly to a beta stable nucleus,
137Ba (barium-137).
18/ The natural decay is 94.7% to the excited 11/2- state of
137Ba, which is followed by emission of a 662 keV gamma ray. Decay directly to the groundstate
of 137Ba occurs in 5.3% of the cases. When induced by an applied field, the relative
importance of the two final states in
137Cs decay is dependent on field intensity.
[0039] When subjecting beta active fission fragments to decay-inducing fields, the most
likely aim would be twofold: to reduce the level of radioactivity of fission wastes,
and to produce useful energy thereby. Other long-lived fission products which experience
forbidden beta decays include
85Kr (krypton-85) which has a 10.72 year halflife because of the same kind of unique
first forbidden decay as
90Sr and
137Cs. Also included are much longer lived fission products like
135Cs (
2.
3 x 1
06 years), 99Tc (technetium-99, 2.13 x
105 years), and
129I (iodine-129, 1.57 x 10
7 years), all of which have "second-forbidden" transitions. These, with a number of
other fission products, could make a contribution to total energy release even though
they represent less of a disposal problem than
90Sr and 137Cs. They are listed below, with the probability of occurrence as a fission
product (yield)
19/, normal halflife, and the maximum beta decay energy available when stimulated.
D. Potential Energy Resources.
1. Resources from Naturally-Occurring Nuclides.
[0040] The potential resources of energy contained in naturally occurring nuclides with
inducible beta decays are difficult to state in absolute terms. Nevertheless, a relative
statement of resources as compared to some more familiar material can serve to set
the scale. The table below gives the energy potentially available from induced beta
decay in a variety of fuels as compared to the energy in
235U (uranium-235) and in
6Li (lithium-6).
235U is the only nuclide found in Nature which is subject to fission by slow neutrons.
It is the present basis of the nuclear power industry.
6Li is the ultimate practical source of the tritium that is necessary for the DT (deuterium-tritium)
nuclear fusion reaction. The DT reaction represents the most likely prospect for success
for practical energy from nuclear fusion. In the table, 200 MeV of energy is presumed
to be available from each 235u nucleus, and each
6Li nucleus is taken to give rise to the 17.6 MeV of the DT reaction. The beta decay
nuclides are evaluated in terms of the sum of half the beta decay energy plus all
the gamma decay energy emitted in the progress of the decay to the final state. The
abundance data used
20/ are atom abundances (atoms per 100 silicon atoms) of the elements as they occur in
the igneous rocks of the Earth's crust.

[0041] Energy potentially available from induced beta decay of materials in the Earth's
crust is seen to compare favorably with other types of nuclear energy. Beta energy
resources are about one half of DT fusion energy resources, and they are about three
hundred times greater than
235U fission energy resources. This second comparison signifies that beta energy resources
exceed the resources available in total from uranium, with breeding included. Furthermore,
assessments based on igneous rock understate beta energy resources since calcium,
for example, is much more abundant in sedimentary rock. An energy resource comparison
of
235U with
48Ca in limestone favors
48Ca by a factor of the order of I0
4.
[0042] Certain of the beta energy resources occur extensively in seawater, so the resources
in the Earth's hydrosphere should be considered in addition to the resources of the
lithosphere listed above. Seawater is not a significant source of either lithium or
uranium, so a direct comparison as just done for igneous rock is not available. Instead,
an index of resource assessment introduced by Hubbert
21/ can be employed. He compared DD fusion resources with fossil fuels, based on the
extraction of 1% of the deuterium from the oceans. With the same 1% extraction assumed
for the beta energy fuels, and with the composition of seawater as given by Rankama
and Sahama
22/, the resource figures in the following table are arrived at.

[0043] The resources of potential beta decay energy are seen to be very large indeed. As
compared to the total initial world supply of petroleum, the energy of
48Ca is twenty thousand times as large, and
40K and
87Rb are also impressively larger in magnitude than the energy resources of petroleum.
Since Hubbert has estimated that DT fusion energy resources are of the same order
of magnitude as total fossil fuel energy, a comparison between beta energy resources
in the hydrosphere and in the lithosphere can be made. For
40K,
87Rb, and
48Ca, resources from the oceans are much greater than from the rocks;
50V is similar in importance from either source; while
113Cd and
115In are available only from the lithosphere.
2. Resources from Fission Products.
[0044] Whether the primary intent of stimulating forbidden beta transitions in fission products
is to reduce the burden of radioactive wastes, or to achieve useful energy therefrom,
an assessment of the size of the power source thus available is appropriate. If nuclear
fission power capacity reaches a level of 900,000 megawatts, then the long lived beta
active fission products generated per year by this nuclear industry would have an
energy content of the order of 2000 megawatt years. That is, if it should be possible
to consume these fission products on a steady-state basis as they are produced, the
total power available from the fission products is about 2000 MW, or about 800 MW
of electricity if thermal losses are considered. Of this total,
90Sr and
137Cs taken together represent about
80%, and
135 Cs and
99 Tc together represent another 10% or so.
II. EXPLANATION OF THE INVENTION
A. Theory.
[0045] The basic idea of this invention is that forbidden beta decays can have their forbiddenness
removed by the intervention of the angular momentum and parity contained in an applied
electromagnetic field. There are some nuclear species whose beta decays are so highly
forbidden by angular momentum and parity selection rules that their halflives are
of the order of, or greater than, the age of the solar system. Other nuclides have
such long halflives that no beta decay activity has ever been observed in them, even
though it is possible in principle. Such quasi-stable nuclear species are thus still
to be found among the mineral resources of the Earth. Other nuclides with forbidden
beta decays are generated as byproducts of nuclear fission reactions. Both natural
and manmade forbidden beta species contain potential energy resources which can be
released for practical use when their beta decays are induced to occur by an applied
field. Independently of (or conjointly with) any utilization of energy therefrom,
the induced beta decay of fission products serves to reduce a major radioactive waste
disposal problem.
[0046] The theory of induced beta decay is developed by first deducing the quantum mechanical
dynamical equations for the relevant internal nuclear coordinates in the presence
of an external field. This both specifies the equation of motion which must be solved,
and serves to exhibit the effective charge with which the beta active portion of the
nucleus is coupled to the external field. A formalism is developed which is the extension
of the usual beta decay theory to the case where the nuclear states and beta particle
experience interaction with the applied field. Specific calculational examples are
given to demonstrate the formalism in computing a final result.
[0047] The nature of the applied field is examined in its context as input to the nuclear
calculation. The electromagnetic field experienced by a nucleus is a superposition
of the externally applied field and the internal fields in the medium contributed
by the atom or solid in which the nucleus is embedded. As expressed in terms of electromagnetic
field potentials (in Coulomb gauge), it is shown that it is the vector potential which
is unaffected by fields internal to the medium, and it is the vector potential which
is effective in causing induced beta decay. The scalar potential is strongly modified
by=the internal fields, but the scalar potential is of no significance to induced
beta decay.
B. Embodiments.
[0048] One example of an electromagnetic field source to induce beta decay is a coaxial
transmission line operating in TEM (transverse electromagnetic) mode. The fuel is
incorporated as the dielectric medium between the inner and outer conductors of the
coaxial line. The power transmitted along the line is dumped into an absorptive load
which is cooled by the same coolant employed to remove energy from the fuel. The electromagnetic
field in the simplest TEM mode in a coaxial transmission line has just the form presumed
in the theoretical treatment developed here. An example of the application of this
system is given.
[0049] Another electromagnetic field source is a resonant coaxial cavity. This is similar
to the coaxial transmission line, except that the line is terminated by reflectors
at a cavity length equal to an integer number of half wavelengths of the cavity field
(in simplest TEM mode). Other cavity lengths are possible, depending on the design
of the input circuit, and how the termination is loaded. An example is given.
[0050] Many other field sources are possible. For example, transmission lines other than
coaxial can be used, such as two-wire, four-wire, coaxial cage, strip line, etc. Furthermore,
even some very ordinary circuit elements carrying alternating current will possess
in their vicinity electromagnetic fields, a fractional amplitude of which corresponds
to the TEM mode of a propagating plane wave as considered in the theoretical development.
For example, one can use the fields in close proximity to a long conducting cylinder
or to a solenoid. An in-between case with certain advantages is a hollow conducting
torus. In these cases, the fuel is placed in those regions near the conductors where
the field configuration and intensity are most advantageous. This would be, for example,
in a cylinder coaxial with the long conducting cylinder, or a torus enveloping the
hollow conducting torus.
[0051] Particular embodiments of a method and apparatus in accordance with this invention
will now be discussed and described with reference to the accompanying drawings; in
which:-
Figure 1 is a diagrammatic representation of a laboratory experiment carried out to
verify the theory of the present invention;
Figure 2 is a diagram of a first embodiment of an apparatus including a coaxial transmission
line; and,
Figure 3 is a diagram of a second embodiment of and apparatus including a coaxial
resonant cavity.
III. DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
A. Theory.
1. Introduction.
[0052] To ascertain the effect of an externally applied electromagnetic field on the internal
coordinates of a nucleus, the nucleus is considered to consist of two parts: a "core"
and a "fragment." The core is a stable sub-nucleus of zero total angular momentum;
and the fragment contains the nucleon (or nucleons) which is a candidate for beta
decay, plus any other nucleons which are angular momentum coupled to it in initial
or final states. The equation of motion is then separated into center-of-mass (CM)
and relative coordinate equations giving, respectively, the dynamical equations for
the motion of the center of mass of the entire nucleus and the relative motion of
the fragment with respect to the core. It is this latter equation which must be solved.
[0053] The theory of induced beta decay involves a coupling of the nuclear fragment both
to the external electromagnetic field and to the weak (beta decay) interaction. The
coupling constant of the weak interaction is very small. On the other hand, the coupling
constant to the electromagnetic field is very much larger, particularly in view of
the relatively large intensity of the applied field. Furthermore, the field can be
regarded as being on for a time approaching infinity before and after the beta decay
occurs. Therefore, the weak interaction is treated as a perturbation which causes
a transition of the nucleus-plus-field system from one state to another. The combined
nuclear-electromagnetic field system is explicitly time dependent, so the standard
derivation of the perturbation formalism of beta decay (based on stationary nuclear
states) is not appropriate. However, a derivation which is applicable in the presence
of explicit time dependence gives a result which has the standard form.
[0054] The perturbation theory just described requires a knowledge of the state vector for
the nuclear fragment in the presence of the field. The interacting nuclear wave function
employed is the momentum translation approximation.
[0055] The electron emitted in the beta decay does not appear until the decay has occurred,
and so its interaction with the field might be thought to be of little consequence.
However, the field intensity parameter associated with induced beta decay is so large
(and the mass of the electron sufficiently small) that the onset of effective interaction
of the electron with the field occurs on a shorter time scale than the Heisenberg
uncertainty time of the beta decay interaction. The onset of field-electron interaction
is also much faster than the transit time of the newly created beta particle across
the nucleus. The electron is therefore represented by a Volkov wave function, which
is an exact solution for a free charged particle in the presence of an electromagnetic
field.
[0056] A general expression for the transition probability for induced beta decay contains
matrix elements for Fermi and Gamow-Teller transitions which are generalizations of
those which occur in ordinary beta decay. Coupling of the electromagnetic field to
the beta particle causes the transition probability to split into three parts corresponding
to: direct interaction of the field with the electron charge, interaction of the field
with the spin of the electron, and an interference between the direct and spin terms.
For the field intensities of interest here, the direct term and the spin terms are
of approximately equal importance for the more energetic beta decays, although the
direct term dominates for low energy decays.
[0057] The final form for the transition probability per unit time, or equivalently, for
the halflife for induced beta decay, is written for any order of forbiddenness which
is to be overcome by the inducing field, and for any number of nucleons in the fragment.
Results for several fuel nuclei are given.
[0058] All of the above theory is predicated on a particular form for the applied electromagnetic
field, and a relatively large intensity is found to be required. Possible sources
of such a field are considered.
2. Separation of Variables.
[0059] In the cases of interest here, one can consider the initial nucleus to consist of
a stable, relatively tightly-bound "core," plus a "fragment" of one or several nucleons
outside the core. This fragment contains the nucleon which is a candidate for beta
decay, plus any other nucleons which couple with it to provide the observed total
angular momentum and parity of the nucleus. The "core" will always be such as to 90
have spin and parity O
+. For example, consider
90Sr, which has 38 protons, 52 neutrons, and a total spin of zero and positive intrinsic
parity (J
π = O
+). The core nucleus can be considered to be 88sr, which has 50 neutrons, J
π = O
+, and is the principal stable isotope of strontium.
88Sr is particularly stable since the neutron number of 50 is a magic number, and the
proton number of 38 corresponds to completed p
3/2 and f5/2 shells beyond the magic number of 28.
23/ The "fragment" constituents of two neutrons in
90Sr outside the
88Sr core are both d
5/2 neutrons, coupled together to give an overall O
+ state. One of these two neutrons will decay to a p
1/2 proton, which will couple with the remaining d
5/2 neutron to form a 2 state in the daughter
90 Y nucleus.
[0060] A table of such separations into core and fragment will be given below for all of
the nuclides of interest here.
[0061] When the Schrodinger equation is separated in terms of the CM coordinate R and the
relative coordinate r of the fragment with respect to the CM, the result is
24/

where m
t and e
t are the total mass and total charge

and m
r and ẽ are the reduced mass and reduced charge

The subscripts 1 and 2 refer to fragment and core, respectively. The so-called "natural"
units (

=c=1) are employed here.
[0062] The implication of the reduced charge expression, Eq. (4), is that the fragment behaves
as if it has a positive charge when there is a preponderance of protons in the fragment,
a negative charge when neutrons predominate, and a near-zero charge when equal numbers
of protons and neutrons exist in the nuclear fragment.
3. S-Matrix Formalism.
[0063] When the beta decay transition probability is induced by an applied electromagnetic
field, it is appropriate to view the asymptotic states as states which contain the
full influence of the applied field, and the transition-causing "perturbation" will
be the beta decay interaction. This means that the asymptotic states are explicitly
time dependent, and not the stationary states normally employed. This is not a "textbook"
situation, but a derivation of the appropriate S-matrix element (or transition amplitude)
gives the result

[0064] This has precisely the appearance of the standard result, except that here it must
be remembered that the nuclear and leptonic states are states containing the full
effects of the applied electromagnetic field. In Eq. (5), ψ
i and ψ
f are the initial and final nuclear states, ψ
(e) and ψ (ν) are the electron and neutrino states, all in the presence of the applied
field; G is the weak interaction coupling constant; κ is the ratio of axial vector
to vector couplings for nuclear beta decay; and the γ
ν, y
5 are
Di
rac matrices.
4. Interacting Nuclear States.
[0065] The calculational procedure developed above for induced beta emission is to substitute
wave functions including the effects of the applied electromagnetic field. The formalism
is otherwise the standard beta decay calculation. The nuclear wave function to be
used must represent the effects of the applied field to an order of interaction which
is at least as large as the order of forbiddenness of the natural beta decay. It must
also be valid: in the presence of electromagnetic fields of such intensity that the
convergence of conventional perturbation theory is suspect. A technique ideally suited
to the present problem is the momentum translation approximation
5/.
[0066] The momentum translation expression for the nuclear wave function in interaction
with the electromagnetic field is

where Φ(r,t) is the nuclear wave function with no electromagnetic field. Validity
conditions for the approximation in Eq. (6) are
5/.

where a is the amplitude of A, R is the nuclear radius, w is the energy of a photon
of the applied field, and E is the total nuclear transition energy. It will become
evident later that eaR must be of 0 order unity, and w/E will be many orders of magnitude
less than unity. Equation (7) is thus easily satisfied. Equation (8) states essentially
that the ratio of the nuclear radius to the wavelength of the applied field is very
small, which is amply satisfied for all fields of possible interest. One further condition
for applicability of the momentum translation approximation is that no intermediate
nuclear states are accessible through interaction with a small number of applied-field
photons. This is certainly not possible here. Hence, Eq. (6) is an excellent approximation
to employ here.
[0067] With the standard product solution for the noninteracting wave function

the initial nuclear wave function in the presence of the field is, from Eq. (6),

and the final nuclear wave function to be used is

[0068] The reduced charges, ẽi and ẽ
f are the appropriate forms of Eq. (4); and ψ
i(r), ψ
f(r) are stationary state nuclear wave functions with no field present.
5. Interacting Lepton States.
[0069] The leptons emitted in β
- decay are an electron and an antineutrino
25/. The antineutrino is uncharged, and possesses no coupling to the electromagnetic
field. The antineutrino is therefore described by an ordinary free-particle wave function.
The emitted antineutrino is treated as a neutrino in the initial state with reversed
four-momentum, i.e.,

[0070] In Eq. (11), k
(ν) is the four-momentum with time part E(ν), u
(ν) is a spinor, s
(ν) is the spin parameter, and V is the normalization volume. The scalar product indicated
in the exponential is a four-vector product k(ν ) · x = k
(ν)µ x
µ = E
(ν)t - k
(ν).
[0071] The electron emitted in beta decay is a charged particle whose coupling to the electromagnetic
field is very significant when the field intensity is high. In ordinary beta decay
theory, the electron is treated as a free particle, although Coulomb corrections are
sometimes introduced. In the present situation, the free particle electron solution
is replaced by the
Volkov solution
26/, which is an exact wave function for a free, charged particle in the presence of
a plane wave electromagnetic field. The circumstances which the Volkov solution are
to describe are that the electron suddenly appears at some time (say t = 0) in an
electromagnetic field which has been on for a long time prior to the creation of the
electron. It is thus appropriate to consider the field to be monochromatic. The electromagnetic
field is specified as

whereP is a phase shift reflecting the fact that the beta decay cannot be expected
to occur in phase with the field. The polarization four vector e in Eq. (12) has the
scalar invariant ε
2 = -l. The required solution is

with the definitions

[0072] (The minus sign is introduced in the definition of ζ to account for the fact that
a gauge with ε° =0 will be used, in which case p
e·ε = -Pe·ε).
6. Transition Probability per Unit Time.
[0073] The wave functions given in Eqs. (9), (10), (11), and (13) give the input necessary
to apply the S-matrix of Eq. (5). Standard procedures of quantum mechanics are then
employed to arrive at a transition probability per unit time for induced beta decay.
The final result divides naturally into three separate parts which can be identified
as a direct term, a spin term, and an interference term. This comes about because
the Volkov solution, Eq. (13), contains the factor

The first term in this factor occurs in the corresponding solution for a spinless
particle, whereas the second term is associated directly with the half-integral spin
of the electron. When the square of the S-matrix is formed, these two terms lead to
three terms in the transition probability, one of which arises as an interference
term between the direct and spin terms.
[0074] The results are quite complex in form, in general, but an important simplification
can be introduced, based on the relative magnitudes of two intensity parameters which
occur. One intensity parameter can be associated with the interaction of the nuclear
particles with the electromagnetic field. It is given by

where a is the amplitude of the vector potential of the field as given in Eq. (12),
and R is the nuclear radius. This quantity is typical of intensity parameters which
arise in bound-state intense-field problems.
27,28/ The other intensity parameter is associated with the interaction of free electrons
with the electromagnetic field.
27,28/ It is

[0075] The two parameters are related by

[0076] Of these parameters, it is the z of Eq. (15) which plays the more important role
in the interchange of angular momentum and parity between the beta-decay system and
the field. Although the specific value of z for which optimum conditions for induced
beta decay to occur depends upon the particular beta decay, it is generally true that
this optimum z is roughly of order unity. Then, however, Eq. (17) shows that z
f will be large. This justifies the use of asymptotic approximations for certain generalized
Bessel functions
27/ which appear in the present theory, as they do in all relativistic intense-field
theories involving charged particles with spin. These asymptotic approximations make
possible a relatively simple final form for the transition probability per unit time.
[0077] When z
f »1, as discussed above, the transition probability per unit time, W, is of the form

where

is a spectral integral consisting of three parts arising from the direct, spin, and
interaction terms; and where the squared nuclear matrix element is

[0078] The form (18) corresponds to- the standard form for allowed beta decay, where

with

and, when Coulomb corrections are neglected, as they are in the present work, the
spectral integral is

[0079] The separate spectral integrals in Eq. (19) have a fairly complicated form because
of an assumption made in their derivation. In the complex pattern of absorptions and
emissions of external intense-field energy by the nuclear system, it is presumed that
no net energy can be extracted from the external field. This is conservative in that
it amounts to neglecting part of the transition probability. The direct, spin, and
interference spectral integrals so derived are

where h
1 (ε
o, ε
e) is the spectral function

where the spectral function is

and

involving the spectral function

[0080] In these expressions, ε
e is a dimensionless electron energy, ε
o is a dimensionless nuclear energy change, and
p e is a dimensionless electron momentum defined by

where

[0081] The last definition required is

7. Nuclear Parameters.
[0082] Table 1 gives the information required to apply the foregoing formalism to computation
of nuclear matrix elements involved in induced beta decay. The first seven nuclides
listed are materials found in Nature, and the last two are the principal fission fragment
waste products. Nuclear spin and parity assignments are from "Nuclear Data Sheets"
(except for
40K, which is from P. M. Endt and C. Van der Leun, Nucl. Phys. A310, 1 (1978)). Angular
momentum assignments for nucleons in the "fragments" are standard shell model assignments.
29/ The reduced charge for the fragment comes from Eq. (4).
[0083] A few examples of how fragment assignments are made are given here. For example,
113Cd has a single nucleon fragment. The core nucleus,
11248Cd
64, is a stable nuclide in Nature with spin and parity of O
+. By the usual single particle model, this means that this "even-even" nuclide has
the spins of all of its protons and of all of its neutrons anti-aligned in pairs to
give pairwise and overall zero angular momentum. The odd neutron in
113Cd has a shell model assignment of s
1/2, which should then determine the entire nuclear spin and parity to be

which is the case. Upon beta decay, the unpaired s
1/2 neutron becomes an unpaired g
9/2 proton, which then contributes the entire observed

spin and parity of the final
11349In
64 nucleus.
[0084] An example of a two nucleon fragment is provided by
9038Sr
52. The core nucleus,
8838Sr
50, is the principal stable isotope of strontium. In particular, N=50 is a "magic number"
23/ for the neutron shell in
88Sr, and Z=38 represents the closure of an f
5/2 shell for the protons, so
88Sr is a clear case of a stable, relatively tightly bound core nucleus. The two neutrons
in
90Sr beyond the magic number of N=50 then constitute the fragment, one of whose two
neutrons will undergo beta decay. They must be

considered as a pair because initially they are angular momentum coupled to O
+, and it is impossible to say which of the two will decay. Finally, the remaining
d
5/2 neutron will couple to the newly formed p
1/2 proton to give the 2
- state of the
3990Y
51 daughter nucleus.
[0085] 8737Rb
50 is an example of a nuclide where the fragment must consist of three nucleons. The
odd proton in
87Rb must be part of the fragment because initially this p
3/2 particle accounts for the entire
87Rb spin and parity of 2 The beta decay itself involves a neutron, not the odd proton,
and since the beta decay neutron is initially paired with another to give O
+, then both of these neutrons must also be assigned to the fragment. In the final
state, the g
9/2 neutron which beta decays to a p
3/2 proton will couple to O
+ with the initial odd proton, while the remaining g
9/2 neutron finds itself unpaired in the final state, and so accounts for the

spin and parity of the
87Sr daughter nucleus.
2
[0086] The state assignments shown in the table for
137Cs require a special comment.
137Cs has a

ground state, with an L=l decay to an

state and an L=2 decay to a

state of the daughter
137Ba nucleus. 2 The contrast between the spins and parities of these states suggests
something unusual.
137Ba has 81 neutrons and
137Cs has 82 neutrons--a magic number. The last two neutron shells to be filled before
the magic number is reached are the d
3/2 and h
11/2 shells. Between neutron numbers 67 and 79, there is alternation in the filling of
these two levels. It can be inferred, therefore, that when
137Cs beta decays to the

level of
137Ba, it is a d
3/2 neutron in
137Cs which experiences the beta decay, leaving an unpaired d
3/2 neutron in
137 Ba to contribute the

angular momentum of the final nucleus; and in decay to the
11 level of Ba, it is an h
11/2 neutron in
137Cs which experiences the decay, leaving an unpaired h
ll/2 neutron to account for the

final state.
8. Nuclear Matrix Elements.
a. Form of the Nuclear Matrix Element
[0087] Total transition probability per unit time is given in Eq. (18). It contains the
squared transition matrix element |M
ind|
2, defined in Eq. (20). This will now be examined in more detail.
[0088] Equation (20) is expressed as the sum of four terms. The first pair of terms arises
from the vector part of the beta decay interactioh, and corresponds to the usual Fermi
matrix element of beta decay theory. The second pair of terms (the ones containing
the Pauli spin operators σ) comes from the axial vector part of the beta decay interaction,
and corresponds to the usual Gamow-Teller matrix element of beta decay theory. However,
a simplification can be introduced from isospin considerations, which have not been
placed in evidence in the above work. For Fermi matrix elements, the isospin conservation
rule is ΔT=O
30,31/, where T is the total isospin quantum number. Since this condition is not satisfied
for any of the transitions considered here, only the Gamow-Teller matrix elements
will be retained. That is, Eq. (20) is now replaced by
[0089]

The terms in the square bracket in Eq. (21) are squared nuclear transition matrix
elements, with the f and i subscripts referring to final and initial nuclear states.
The coordinate r which occurs in the matrix elements refers to the position vector
r of the nuclear fragment with respect to the nuclear core. In practical calculation
of the nuclear matrix elements, one needs the coordinates of the separate nucleons
contained in the fragment. The vector r gives the location of the CM of the fragment.
Since each nucleon in the fragment can be taken to have the same mass M, then the
position vector of the jth nucleon in the fragment (r
j) is related to r by

where q is the total number of nucleons in the fragment. Since only one of these q
nucleons will undergo beta decay (say the jth one), then whenever rcosθ appears in
the matrix element, the replacement

should be used, where 0. measures the angle between r.
j and the polarization vector of the applied field.
[0090] Equation (21) can be stated in more detail as

where
[0091] In Eqs. (23) and (24), u
j is the dimensionless radial coordinate

j
i is the total angular momentum of the initial state, so that (2j
i+1)
-1 times the sum over m
i is an average over orientations of initial angular momentum; and the sum over m
f is a sum over orientations of the final angular momentum. In practice, only one of
the two terms in Eq. (22) will be nonzero. When ψ
f and ψ
i have the same parity, only M
ficos will survive; and when they have opposite parity, only M
fisin will survive.
b. Sample Results
[0092] The only example in Table 1 which has a single-nucleon fragment is 113Cd. With independent-particle
quantum number assignments as given in Table 1, and with harmonic oscillator functions
employed for the radial wave functions, Eqs. (23) and (22) lead to

[0093] Further reduction of Eq. (25) follows from the experimentally determined value of
K 32/

and the approximate relation between z
f and z

[0094] From Eqs. (25) and (27), the intensity dependence of |M
ind|
2 for
113Cd is given by e
-z/2z7/2 (24-z)
2(8-z)
2. This function has a broad maximum with a peak value at

[0095] Low-intensity behavior is proportional to z
7/2.
[0096] An example of a q=2 nucleus, which has the same
L=
4 forbiddenness as
111Cd is
48Ca. Application of the formalism to this case yields

[0097] Equations (26) and (27) apply again to this result. The low-intensity behavior of
Eq. (29) is proportional to z
7/2, just as in Eq. (25), since both
113Cd and
48Ca have L = 4. However, the intensity parameter which maximizes Eq. (29) is

which is a substantially greater intensity than the maximum for
113Cd given in
Eq. (28).
[0098] Another q = 2 example, but one which has L = 3, is
40K. The squared induced transition matrix element in this case is

which has a maximum at

[0099] One further example for which q = 2 is
90Sr, which has L = 1. The calculation in this case leads to a rather more complicated
answer than the cases above, and it is not convenient to quote the result entirely
in terms of rational numbers, as done above. The
90Sr calculation gives

which reaches a maximum when

[0100] Finally, a three-nucleon fragment case will be considered. The transition to the
11/2
- final state in the beta decay of
137Cs has q = 3 and
L = 1. The final result here is

which is maximized at
9. Induced Halflife.
[0101] The halflife for beta decay is related to the transition probability per unit time
by

[0102] The analogue of Eq. (18) for allowed beta decay gives

in which the constant

is arrived at by using the known value for the beta decay coupling constant, G. It
is conventional in beta decay work to express results in terms of "log ft" values.
Equation (37) would lead to a log ft expression

[0103] However, in practice, the simple theoretical log ft values for allowed beta decays
are always smaller than those found experimentally, except for a special group of
beta decays known as "superallowed" decays. Empirically, this can be incorporated
into the theoretical expression by modifying the constants shown above, so that, for
nuclides of even mass number

and for nuclides of odd mass number
33/

[0104] Log ft values do not represent the most convenient way to express results for induced
beta decays, so the empirical constants expressed in Eqs. (18) and (37) will be converted
into revised constants for a halflife expression like Eq. (37) by using

for even-A nuclides, and setting

for odd-A nuclides.
[0105] Consider
113Cd as an example of the application of the above formalism. Equation (25), when evaluated
at the intensity stated in Eq. (28), gives |M
ind|
2 = 3.08 x 10 . The spectral integrals can be evaluated from the knowledge that
113Cd has a beta-decay Q of 297 keV, which leads to ε
o = 1.581 from ε
o = E
o/m
= 1 + (Q/m). The spectral integrals give f
1 = 9.90 x 10
-2, f 2 = 3.09 x 10
-2, and f
3 = -0.64 x 10
-2. The negative value for f
3 means that interference between direct and spin terms is a partially destructive
interference.- The total induced spectral integral is

[0106] This value, when substituted in Eq. (41) with the above result for |M
ind|
2, gives

for
113Cd. This is to be compared with the natural decay halflife of 9.3 x 10
15 years.
[0107] For
48Ca,
Eqs. (29) and (30) give |M
ind|
2 = 3.
68 x 10
-5. The Q value for the 0
+ to 5
+ transition is 150 keV, so ε
o = 1.294. Then the spectral integral results are f
1 = 5.68 x 10
-3 f
2 = 0.98 x 10
-3, f
3 =
-0.20 x 10
-3, for a total f
ind = 6.46 x 10
-3. When Eq. (40) is employed, the induced halflife is
[0108]

[0109] The
40K case gives |M
ind|
2 = 5.32x10
-7 from Eqs. (31) and (32), and f
1 = 81.3, f 2 - 68.6, f
3 = -13.9, f
ind = 136.2, leading to

[0110] In the case of
90Sr, the calculation leads to |M
ind|
2 = 3.50x10
-4, f
1 = 1.40, f
2 = 0.70, f
3 = -0.14, and f
ind = 1.96. The induced halflife

when combined with the natural halflife of 28.6 years, gives an overall halflife in
both natural and induced channels of 7.62 years.
[0111] Results for
137Cs are: |M
ind|
2 = 1.57 x 10
-5 from Eqs. (35) and (36); Q = 512 keV, or ε
o = 2.001 for the transition to the 11/2 state; f
1 = 1.05, f
2 = 0.
50, f
3 = -0.1
0, f
ind = 1.45; and

[0112] In this L = 1 case, the result is actually an induced halflife decay channel that
is slower than the natural decay. However, under optimum induced field conditions,
the L = 2 transition to the 3/2
+ final state would be the dominant transition.
[0113] Power density in an induced beta decay fuel can be expressed as

where E is the decay energy involved in the beta decay of a single nucleus, Wind is
the total induced transition probability as found from Eq. (18), and P is the number
of active nuclei per unit volume. If E is expressed in MeV, W
ind in sec
1,
p in nuclei per cubic meter, and power density in watts per cubic meter, then Eq. (42)
becomes

[0114] This expression can be used inversely to find the density of active nuclei needed
to achieve a given power density. For example, assuming the lower limit of power density
of practical interest is of the order of 10 watts per m
3, Eq. (43) leads to a minimum density of active nuclei of the order of 10
14/EW
ind.
10. Strength of the Electromagnetic Interaction.
[0115] From Eq. (18) and the results obtained for the squared matrix element, it is seen
that the overall transition probability for induced beta decay at low field intensity
is of the form

where C depends on properties of the nucleus, and all field dependence is contained
in the

factor. One might expect to find a dependence on z in
Eq. (44) rather than

, since the process being described is an Lth order interaction with the electromagnetic
field. The loss of half a power in z comes from the asymptotic forms for the generalized
Bessel functions. Physically, the loss in z dependence arises from the emitted electron.
The interaction of the relatively light beta particle with the very intense field
is so severe that very rapid oscillations in the phase of the electron occur, causing
a reduction in the beta decay transition amplitude. Equation (22) shows that contributions
arising from an Lth order interaction of the nucleus with the field is diminished
by z
f1/2, a free electron interaction parameter coming from the beta particle.
[0116] The parameter z has been spoken of as a field intensity parameter; but, as is evident
from Eq. (44), it is identified also as the coupling strength of the field-nucleus
interaction. An alternative way to write z is as

[0117] In Eq. (45), a
o is the fine structure constant, which is conventionally taken in quantum electrodynamics
to be the measure of the strength of coupling between the electromagnetic field and
an elementary particle of charge e. However, the electromagnetic field is a Bose field,
and the more photons there are in a given mode of the field, the more the interaction
probability involving that mode is increased. This enhancement is measured by the
photon density p. The factors λR
o2 in Eq. (45) define an effective interaction volume, so that pλR
o2 is a measure of the number of photons which are in interaction with the charged nuclear
system. The interaction volume can be viewed as a box whose cross-sectional area is
defined by the area of the nucleus, and whose length is the wavelength of the field.
[0118] The intensity parameter z as defined in Eq. (15) appears superficially to be dependent
on the choice of gauge for the electromagnetic field. It is, in fact, gauge-invariant
in any relativistically-stated "simple" gauge.
24/
[0119] A way to avoid possible confusion about gauge invariance of z is to express it directly
in physical quantities. One way is to write the intensity parameter for the plane
wave in terms of the electric field as

or in terms of the magnetic induction as

where E and B
o are the amplitudes of the E and B fields and ε
r is the dielectric constant of the material in which the wave propagates. When and
c factors are inserted where appropriate, E and B are given in Mks units (as volts
per meter and teslas, respectively), the frequency v(ω=2πν) is given in Hertz, and
R is taken to be 5x10
-15 meters, then we can express the intensity parameter z as

[0120] Equation (48) can be used inversely to find field parameters necessary to achieve
a given intensity parameter. For example, assuming the lowest z of practical interest
is of the order of 10
-3, then the magnetic induction needed to achieve this at the frequency v is of the
order of

where B is in teslas and v is in Hz.
[0121] The intensity parameter z must be roughly of the order of unity for induced beta
decay to be important. A value for the intensity parameter of the order of unity is
difficult to achieve. Some possibilities will be reviewed here. First, the energy
flux of the applied field will be expressed in terms of z. If the energy flux is stated
in units of watts per square centimeter (W/cm
2), and all other quantities are in Gaussian units, the connection is

[0122] The factor 10
-7 is for conversion from ergs to joules. The factor ω c/λR
o2 is the energy flux associated with the passage of a single photon through the interaction
volume, and the factor z/α
o converts this into the overall energy flux. If z is set to unity, and R is replaced
approximately by X
c/80, then the applied field must supply

where λ is in centimeters and P in W/cm
2. A central fact is the inverse square dependence on wavelength, strongly favoring
long wavelength sources, other things being equal. "Other things," however, are not
equal, since the technological capability for producing large radiated power is very
non-uniform across the electromagnetic spectrum. Some representative values of P are
given here for certain well developed sources.

[0123] The energy fluxes listed above are very large. The figure given for the Nd-glass
laser is beyond present capabilities. The C0
2 laser might reach the required intensity, but only in a very small volume with a
short pulse. The energy input would greatly exceed output. The microwave requirement
is also unreasonably large, even in a high-Q cavity. At long wavelengths, however,
practical systems become possible.
lI. Field Potentials at the Nucleus.
[0124] When a nucleus is incorporated in a solid, the applied electric field at the position
of a nucleus will largely be cancelled by counter-fields generated within the solid
of which the nucleus is a part. The applied magnetic field will be essentially unaffected.
It is very important to note that the internal fields which accomplish cancellation
of the applied electric field are entirely quasistatic (i.e., oscillating
[0125] Coulombic fields with negligible radiation component), so that, in Coulomb gauge,
they are describable by an oscillating scalar potential. The internal fields do not
contribute to the vector potential. (Again, this statement applies to Coulomb gauge.)
These statements are explicated by

[0126] When these two expressions for E
int are equated, and an integration performed, then

→ → where A without subscript is A
ext since A
int can be ignored. The total potential experienced by the nucleus is the sum of internal
and external fields, so

[0127] The next question concerns the algebraic form of A. Consider the specific example
of a coaxial transmission line given below. The E and B fields of Eqs. (55) and (56)
are associated with the vector potential in Coulomb gauge given by

[0128] The p,z coordinates which appear in Eq. (50) are macroscopic coordinates. The integral
which appears in Eq. (49) is over nuclear, or microscopic coordinates. Hence, the
p, z coordinates in Eq. (50) can certainly be taken to be constant numbers as far
as any nuclear motions are concerned. Therefore, in an equation of motion like Eq.
(2), Eq. (50) can be expressed simply as A(r,t) = a coswt, where a is a constant amplitude
vector, the trigonometric phase has been shifted, and the long-wavelength approximation
is employed.
[0129] A scalar potential in the form of Eq. (49) leads to a scalar interaction term in
the relative coordinate equation for the nucleus (Eq. (2)) of the form V = -ẽ∂
tA-r. Such a scalar interaction term is of no consequence for induced beta decay. To
show this in simple fashion, consider a time-dependent perturbation theory matrix
element between an initial state and some intermediate state. After the time integration
is done, a scalar potential of this type gives the result

where a is the vector amplitude of the trigonometric term in A. By contrast, the vector
potential A, through the perturbing term -A·(i∇) gives the result

[0130] Since |E-E
i| is a nuclear energy difference, and w is the energy of a single rf photon, the scalar
potential contribution is totally negligible as compared to the vector potential.
B. Laboratory Test of the Theory.
1. Experimental Apparatus
[0131] To subject the foregoing to experimental test, a field source based on a low-frequency
standing wave in a resonant coaxial cavity was employed. The field in the cavity can
be regarded as the superposition of two plane waves of equal amplitude traveling in
opposite directions. Because the transverse dimensions of the coaxial line are very
small as compared to a wavelength, only the TEM (transverse electromagnetic) or plane-wave-like
mode can exist. The coaxial cavity had an air dielectric, with physically very small
radioactive sources attached to the central conductor at a location where the fields
are such that|E|= c|B|. The cavity was operated as a three-quarter-wavelength stub
11, off a coaxial transmission line 20 as shown schematically in Fig. la. The power
supply 4, was a 4.1 MHz radio transmitter sending an unmodulated 40 kW signal down
the transmission line into a water-cooled non-reflecting resistive load 3.
[0132] Two sources10wereemplaced at the |E| = c|B| point in the cavity, shown by the arrow
in Fig. la. One source was approximately 15 µCi of
137Cs, and the other was about 100 µCi of
7Be. The
137 Cs is the "active" source whose first forbidden beta decays to the first excited state
of 137
Ba give rise to 661.64 keV gamma rays. It is this source which should show the effects
of the electromagnetic field.
7Be is a "normalizing" source whose electron capture transition to
7Li is superallowed, and thus is expected to show little or no effects from the applied
field. A 477.57 keV gamma ray is emitted following electron capture. All measurements
of Cs counts were normalized with respect to Be counts as a way of eliminating spurious
non-field-induced influences on the Cs count rate. Both sources consisted of 1 mm
diameter pellets of ion exchange resin containing salts of the radioactive materials.
They were attached to the central conductor with teflon tape, over which was shrunk
a teflon tube. The entire arrangement of sources and attaching materials was electrically
nonconducting.
[0133] Radioactive decay of the sources was monitored by detection of the gamma rays emitted
following the decay. These gamma rays easily penetrate the outer conductor of the
coaxial cavity, and were detected by a Ge(Li) (lithium-drifted germanium) crystal
outside the cavity. As a way of increasing field intensity at the location of the
sources, they were emplaced in a specially constructed test section of very small
diameter. In the test section, the inner conductor diameter was 6 mm, and the outer
conductor diameter was 14 mm. The test section and detection crystal were both encased
in a special low-radiation background shield. Output from the detector was processed
by a 8192 channel analyzer, which provided background subtraction routines to permit
determination of the net gamma-ray count from each of the two sources. A schematic
diagram of the nuclear detection apparatus is given in Fig. lb, which shows the sources
11 attached to the inner conductor 2, of the coaxial line. The gamma ray detection
crystal13, is located outside the outer conductor 14 of the coaxial line 11.
2. Form of the Data
[0134] The experiment was conducted by alternating equal periods of time with the rf power
on and with the power off. Each power-on and power-off part of the cycle was divided
into four equal periods of length determined by presetting "live time" on the multichannel
analyzer to 135 seconds. This corresponded to about 2.5 minutes of clock time. The
reason for this choice is that the 137
Cs decay leads to an isomeric state in 137
Ba which has a 2.55 minute halflife for decay to the ground state. There is no corresponding
delay in emission of the gamma ray following
7Be decay. The isomerism in 137
Ba gives a characteristic buildup and decay pattern to the Cs/Be count ratios through
the successive power-on and power-off cycles.
[0135] The desired result to be obtained from the experiments is a knowledge of the change
in beta decay transition probability in 137
Cs caused by the field. The experiment measures the gamma rays emitted from
137 Ba as a consequence of beta decay from
137 Cs. With the terminology that state a is the initial 137
Cs state, state b is the first excited state in 137
Ba, and state c is the ground state of
137Ba, then a solution of the differential equation for the population of state b as a
function of time is

where N
aο is the initial population of state a, W
a is the transition probability for the beta decay from state a to state b, W is the
transition probability for the gamma transition from state b to state c, and is an
integration constant determined by initial conditions. When the field is turned on,
the transition probability for a→b is modified from 4
a to Ω ,

where A is the incremental transition probability caused by the field. The experiment
is conducted by alternating power-off and power-on cycles of duration T. For each
of these cycles, the integration constant β is evaluated anew by taking the final
condition from each cycle as the initial condition for the following cycle. After
a number of such cycles, the results are expressible as

where ↓ refers to power-off cycles and ↑ refers to power-on cycles. In these results,
the inequality V
b>>W
a is used, and the origin of time t starts anew at every switch between on and off
cycles.
[0136] The rate of gamma-ray emission is

so the number of gamma-ray emissions in time T is ∫
oTdt r(t). This is measured experimentally. When emission rates are identified as coming
from power-on or power-off cycles by up or down arrows as above, then the quantity

can be determined directly from the experiment. In terms of a (measured in the experiment),
and the quantity

which is fixed by experimental conditions, then the relative change in beta decay
transition probability is given by

[0137] In actual application of these results to analysis of the experiment, each of the
quantities

in Eq. (51) is divided by a decay-corrected count of gamma emissions from 7
Be decay within the same on and off cycles as the 137
Cs counts. When corrected for the 53.29-day halflife of
7Be, these
7Be counts are time-independent, and so do not affect the analysis leading up to Eq.
(53).
3. Experimental Results
[0138] The excited-state decay in 137
Ba occurs with known transition probability. When this is combined with the measured
value

for each complete on-cycle or off-cycle, then

which yields, from Eq. (52)

[0139] The outcome of 200 separate, successive, complete cycles with power off followed
by power on, as analyzed in accordance with Eq. (53), gave the final result

[0140] The number given after the ± sign in Eq. (54) is the "standard error", which is the
standard deviation divided by the square root of the number of separate determinations
of △/w
a - 200 in this case. The first a number in Eq. (54) is the measured mean value for
A /w
a.
[0141] One way to assess the meaning of the result in Eq. (54) is through the concept of
confidence intervals
34/. With the use of Student's t-distribution
34/, one can state that the experiments establish that the value of the true mean (as
opposed to the measured mean) is greater than zero at a confidence level of 98.6%.
This is a one-sided confidence interval, rather than the more usual two-sided interval
which states that the true mean lies between a pair of numbers symmetrically disposed
about the measured mean. The result of the experiment can then be restated as establishing
at a 98.6% confidence level that the applied field has caused an increase in beta-decay
transition probability.
C. Examples of Embodiments.
1. Coaxial Transmission Line System
[0142] One embodiment of this invention employs the electromagnetic field propagated in
lowest TEM mode along a coaxial transmission line of circular cylinder configuration.
The fuel constitutes the dielectric medium that lies in the cylindrical annulus between
the inner and outer conductors of the transmission line. The nuclear radiations emitted
by the fuel are converted to thermal energy by being stopped within the fuel and/or
surrounding materials. This thermal energy is then converted in the conventional manner
to drive rotating machinery, or it can be further converted to electrical energy in
conventional fashion.
[0143] The coaxial transmission line operating in the simplest TEM mode represents a straightforward
application of the theory of induced beta decay, since apart from a radial decrease
of the amplitude of the fields, the fields are of pure plane wave type.
[0144] The fuel should be in the form of a non-conducting material. One approach is to use
a solid material of high melting point (e.g., K2Si205, CaC0
3, CdF
2, SrSi0
3) to minimize problems in case of a loss-of-coolant accident. Coolant can be passed
through channels within the fuel annulus, and/or at the outer periphery of the outer
conductor, and/or within the inner conductor. Another strategy is to have the fuel
in the form of an aggregate of geometrical shapes over which a gaseous or liquid coolant
flows. Another approach is to use a fuel with low melting point (but preferably a
high boiling point), so that the fuel is a dielectric liquid at normal operating temperatures.
The fuel itself can then be used as the heat transfer medium, circulating between
the region of the fuel annulus and an external heat exchanger. An advantage of this
technique is that the circulating fuel can be continuously purged of decay products
and replenished with fresh fuel to maintain a steady fuel concentration.
[0145] Figure 2 shows a system based on a coaxial transmission line, consisting of an outer
conductor 1 and an inner conductor 2, terminating in an absorptive load 3, represented
schematically by a resistor. A power supply 4 transmits power of appropriate frequency
along the line. The resulting electromagnetic field in the insulating fuel medium
5, which comprises the dielectric separating inner and outer conductors of the coaxial
transmission line, causes beta decays to be induced in the fuel. The energy generated
within the fuel 5, and the energy transmitted to the absorptive load 3, are transferred
to a coolant fluid 6, which runs a conventional system of turbines 7, and generators
8, to produce the electric power output. A heat dump 9 is provided in the working
fluid system in order to complete the thermal cycle. If the generators 8 are omitted,
the power plant can be used to provide mechanical energy rather than electrical energy.
[0146] To represent the fact that the system could consist of any number of coaxial transmission
lines as just described, Fig. 2 shows two such assemblies.
[0147] For ease of representation, the transmission line in Fig. 2 is shown with a larger
diameter-to-length ratio than is likely to be used in practice. Also for ease of representation,
the transmission line is shown straight, whereas in practice it may be employed in
a coiled configuration with coils one or more layers deep, with axis of coiling horizontal,
vertical, or at any other orientation. Other space-saving configurations other than
coiling may also be used.
[0148] An alternative configuration would have the transmission line consist of a grid of
conductors embedded in a natural mineral deposit containing the fuel material, where
this natural deposit is protected, by nature or by design, from developing inadvertent
conductivity paths.
[0149] In the theoretical treatments given above, most of the work was done in a Gaussian
system of units, with = c = 1. A change is now made to the SI, or Mks, system of practical
electromagnetic units.
[0150] A circular cylinder transmission line operating in the simplest TEM mode has electric
and magnetic fields given by

expressed in p,φ,z cylindrical coordinates, and with permittivity ε and permeability
u relating to the dielectric material contained between the inner and outer conductors.
The amplitude factor C contained in Eqs. (55) and (56) can be related to the intensity
parameter z. It is convenient to use a mean intensity parameter z, where the mean
is obtained by averaging over the volume of the dielectric in the transmission line.
From Eqs. (46) or (47), z is proportional to 1/p
2, and

where P
0 and P
i are, respectively, the inner radius of the outer conductor and the outer radius of
the inner conductor. The end result is that z is

or

[0151] The transmission line is presumed to terminate in a non-reflecting absorptive load.
This means that the simple propagating plane wave character of the fields is unaffected.
It also means that the power transmitted along the line can be converted to thermal
power, which adds to that arising from induced beta decay. Thus, a portion of the
power employed to operate the device can be recovered.
[0152] The power transmitted along a coaxial transmission line is

which becomes

when Eq. (58) and ω=2πν are used. The transmission lines considered will not be long
enough for attenuation along the line to be an important factor.
[0153] Output power from the coaxial system is just average power density times fuel volume,
or, from Eq. (43),

[0154] In Eq. (60), E is the usable energy released per beta decay nucleus expressed in
joules (not in MeV as in Eq. (43)), p without subscript is the density of beta decay
nuclei, and & is the length of the transmission line. Equations (59) and (60) make
clear that input and output powers have the same dependence on the radius of the transmission
line, but output power is proportional to the length of the line. This suggests the
use of long lines, which may be coiled into compact arrays. Total power output of
a single plant need not come from a single transmission line, but could be the summed
contributions of a number of long, coiled lines.
[0155] For example, for 1113
Cd at z = 3.394, as in Eq. (28), a choice of 300 MW thermal power for P in Eq. (60)
at a length of 104m gives a value for
po of 1.68m. Then, with these parameters and a choice of ν= 27.4kHz, the input power
from Eq. (59) is 33.3MW, or P/9. The total thermal power available to the heat exchange
medium is P+U, so in this example this total power is ten times the input power.
[0156] As another example suppose the fuel is potassium hydroxide, enriched to 90% in
40K. If this system is operated at z = 18.647 (see Eq. (32)), a choice of 2.5 x 10
9W thermal power for P in Eq. (60) at a length of 10
4m gives a value for p of 0.481m. With these parameters, and a choice of v = 110kHz,
the input power from Eq. (59) is 2.8 x 10 W, or P/9. As in the Cd example above, the
total power P+U is ten times the input power.
2. Coaxial Resonant Cavity System.
[0157] Another embodiment of this invention employs the electromagnetic field existing in
a resonant coaxial cavity excited in lowest TEM mode. The cavity is just like the
coaxial transmission line treated above, except that it is terminated by reflectors
at a length equal to an integer number of half wavelengths. As with the transmission
line, the fuel constitutes the dielectric medium contained between the inner and outer
conductors of the coaxial cavity. The nuclear radiations emitted by the fuel are converted
to thermal energy by being stopped within the fuel and/or surrounding materials. This
thermal energy is then converted to mechanical and/or electrical energy in the conventional
manner.
[0158] Figure 3 shows a system based on a coaxial resonant cavity consisting of an outer
conductor 1 and an inner conductor 2. A power supply 4 provides the power necessary
to sustain an electromagnetic field which is resonant in the cavity. This electromagnetic
field induces beta decays to occur in the insulating fuel medium 5, which comprises
the dielectric separating the inner and outer conductors of the coaxial cavity. The
energy generated within the fuel medium, as well as the energy occurring as wall losses
in the cavity, are transferred to a coolant fluid 6, which runs a conventional system
of turbines 7, and generators 8, to produce the electric power output. A heat dump
9 is provided in the working fluid system in order to complete the thermal cycle.
Direct mechanical output can be provided in place of electrical output if the generators
8 are omitted.
[0159] To represent the fact that the system could consist of any number of coaxial cavities
as just described, Fig. 3 shows two such assemblies.
[0160] For ease of representation, the resonant cavity in Fig. 3 is shown with a larger
diameter-to-length ratio than is likely to be used in practice. Also for ease of representation,
the cavity is shown straight, whereas in practice it may be employed in a coiled configuration
with coils one or more layers deep, with axis of coiling horizontal, vertical, or
at any other orientation. Other space-saving configurations other than coiling may
also be used.
[0161] An alternative configuration would have the resonant cavity consist of a grid of
conductors embedded in a natural mineral deposit containing the fuel material, where
this natural deposit is protected, by nature or by design, from developing inadvertent
conductivity paths.
[0162] The coaxial cavity considered here is taken to be the same as the coaxial transmission
line treated above, but with the length specified to be an integer multiple of half
a wavelength, and with both ends closed by reflectors. Equations (55) and (56) are
replaced by

[0163] The length of the cavity is given in terms of field frequency v by

where n is the number of half wavelengths within the cavity. In the above equations,
k is defined by

[0164] The intensity parameter can be averaged radially as it was in the transmission line,
but an axial averaging is also appropriate. This axial averaging is complicated by
the fact that induced beta decay occurs under plane-wave-like conditions where |E|=c|B||/ε
r½. is true throughout a transmission r line, but a cavity has regions where |E|>c|B|/ε
r½ and regions where the opposite is true. When axial averaging is done in a cavity
under the premise that the governing field amplitude is always the smaller of the
local values of |E| or c|B|/ε
r½, then the combined axial and radial average is

or

[0165] In this case input power is just the loss in the cavity walls. This power loss is

[0166] The last term in the final parenthesis in Eq. (66) gives the losses in the end walls
of the cavity. These are negligible for parameters of interest here, so this term
is dropped hereafter. The quantity C' in Eq. (66) is given by Eq. (65), so the cavity
equivalent of Eq. (59) for the transmission line is

[0167] The factorδ in Eqs. (66) and (67) is the skin depth, given by

where σ is the conductivity of the cavity wall material. If this material is copper,
then Eq. (68) is

[0168] This implies a ν
3/2 dependence on frequency in Eq. (67).
[0169] Output power is still expressed by Eq. (60) with the important proviso that the z
employed in the evaluation of W
dind in Eq. (60) comes from Eq. (64) and not from Eq. (57). Equation (64) takes into consideration
the spatially periodic decline to zero of the fields within the cavity. With the same
set of assumptions employed for the transmission line example with
113Cd, one obtains again p = 1.68m forℓ=
104m with z = 3.394 and P = 3x10
8W. A calculation of input power now requires an assumption for n. If n=10, then ν=
75kHz and U = 3 x 106W. In the case of a cavity, output thermal power is then about
100 times input power. For the same set of assumptions as employed for the transmission
line
40K example, one obtains again p =
0.
481m for ℓ = 10
4m with z = 18.647 and P = 2.5 x 10
9W. If n = 20, then v = 130kHz and U = 2.5 x 10
7w.
3. Other Transmission Zines and Resonant Systems
[0170] The results presented above apply also to other traveling wave and standing wave
transmission line arrangements. By other transmission lines are meant, for example,
the two-wire, four-wire, or coaxial cage transmission lines, any of the possible strip-line
configurations, or any other transmission line arrangement that can support a simple
TEM mode. In such cases with a traveling-wave TEM mode, the electric and magnetic
fields will be essentially those stated in Eqs. (55) and (56). For terminations so
arranged as to provide resonance, then Eqs. (61) and (62) are applicable.
4. Other Configurations
[0171] Although transmission lines represent a very convenient way to provide plane-wave-like
electromagnetic fields of large enough intensity to induce beta decay, other field-producing
configurations can also be used. The fields in such cases will not be strictly simple
TEM such as provided by plane waves and transmission lines, but nevertheless some
proportion of the total fields produced can be of that nature. For example, the fields
in close proximity to a long cylinder carrying an alternating current, or the fields
inside a large-diameter solenoid carrying alternating current, or the fields in close
proximity to a large, hollow torus carrying alternating current in the azimuthal direction,
will all possess components that can be employed to induce beta decay.
REFERENCES AND NOTES
[0172]
1. R. F. O'Connell and J. J. Matese, Nature 222, 649 (1969); L. Fassio-Canuto, Phys.
Rev. 187, 2141 (1969);
2. P. B. Shaw, D. D. Clayton, and F. C. Michel, Phys. Rev. 140, B1433 (1965).
3. W. Zernik, Phys. Rev. 132, 320 (1963); Phys. Rev. 133, A117 (1964).
4. H. R. Reiss, Phys. Rev. A 1, 803 (1970); Phys. Rev. Lett. 25, 1149, (1970); Phys.
Rev. D 4, 3533 (1971).
5. H. R. Reiss, Phys. Rev. A 23, 3019 (1981).
6. P. Braunlich, R. Hall, and P. Lambropoulos, Phys. Rev. A 5, 1013 (1972).
7. D. C. Kocher, Nuclear Data Sheets 16, 55 (1975).
8. P. M. Endt and C. Van der Leun, Nucl. Phys. A310, 1 (1978).
9. P. Luksch and J. W. Tepel, Nuclear Data Sheets 27, 389 (1979).
10. B. Harmatz, Nuclear Data Sheets 30, 413 (1980).
11. S. Raman and H. J. Kim, Nuclear Data Sheets B5, 181 (1971).
12. W. E. Greth, S. Gangadharan, and R. L. Wolke, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem. 32, 2113 (1970).
13. J. R. Beene, Nuclear Data Sheets 23, 1 (1978).
14. R. L. Auble, Nuclear Data Sheets 19, 291 (1976).
15. L. R. Medsker, Nuclear Data Sheets B8, 599 (1972).
16. A. S. Kubo and D. J. Rose, Science 182, 1205 (21 Dec. 1973).
17. M. Eisenbud, "Environmental Radioactivity," Academic Press, New York, Second Edition,
1973; pp. 485, 486.
18. R. L. Bunting, Nuclear Data Sheets 15, 335 (1975).
19. Chart of the Nuclides, Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory, Eleventh Edition (1972).
20. K. Rankama and Th. G. Sahama, "Geochemistry," University of Chicago Press, Chicago,
1950; pp. 39, 40.
21. M. K. Hubbert, Scientific American 224, no. 3, 60 (Sept. 1971).
22. Rankama and Sahama, "Geochemistry," p. 290.
23. A "magic number" in nuclear physics is a proton or neutron number associated with
exceptional stability. See publications in note 29.
24. H. R. Reiss, Phys. Rev. A 19, 1140 (1979).
25. Only minor changes are needed to accommodate the case. When Coulomb corrections
to beta decay are ignored, as is done here, final transition probability results for
and cases are .identical in form.
26. D. M. Volkov, Z. Physik 94, 250 (1935).
27. H. R. Reiss, Phys. Rev. A 22; 1786 (1980).
28. See, for example, J. H. Eberly contribution in E. Wolf, ed., "Progress in Optics,"
North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1967, vol. 7, p. 361.
29. J. P. Elliott and A. M. Lane, "The Nuclear Shell Model," Handbuch der Physik,
vol. XXXIX, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1957; M. A. Preston and R. K. Bhaduri, "Structure
of the Nucleus," Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1975, Chapt. 7.
30. E. J. Konopinski, "The Theory of Beta Radioactivity," Oxford University Press,
London, 1966; pp. 144-147.
31. E. D. Commins, "Weak Interactions," McGraw-Hill, New York, 1973; p. 106.
32. E. D. Commins, "Weak Interactions", pp. 115, 184.
33. These numerical values are inferred from averages obtained from Tables 5.2 and
5.5 in Konopinski, "The Theory of Beta Radioactivity."
34. See, for example, J. Mandel, "The Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data",
Interscience, New York, 1964; pp. 114-119 and pp. 185-189; or E. Lukacs, "Probability
and Mathematical Statistics", Academic Press, New York, 1972; pp. 129-132 and pp.
184-186.