FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0001] The present invention relates to a light-sensitive lithographic printing plate precursor.
More particularly, it relates to a light-sensitive lithographic printing plate precursor
that provides a lithographic printing plate which does not cause scumming with the
edges thereof.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] The light-sensitive lithographic printing plate precursor formed on an aluminum support
is being sold under the name of presensitized plate (abbreviated as PS plate). It
is now in general use. The PS plates are produced by treating aluminum supports in
the form of web or sheet, applying a sensitizing solution, drying, and cutting to
size. The treatment include graining, anodizing, and chemical treatment, which are
used individually or in combination with one another.
[0003] The plate obtained by subjecting a PS plate to exposure and development is satisfactory
for printing on a sheet-fed press in which the plate is larger than the printing paper
and the edges of the plate are not used for printing. However, it often deteriorates
printed matter due to stains induced by ink which attaches to the edges of the plate
when the plate is smaller than the printing paper as in newspaper printing in which
printing is made continuously on a web with a rotary press and the edges of the plate
are also involved in printing.
[0004] There is disclosed in Japanese Patent Publication No- 46754/1982 a method for preventing
the scumming caused by the edges of the plate. According to this method, the angle
at the edge of the aluminium support is rounded off with a file or knife. This method,
however, is not suitable for treating a large number of plates, because plates have
to be treated one by one.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0005] As the result of extensive research, the present inventors have found that it is
possible to provide- improved PS plates for lithographic printing which do not cause
scumming at the parts corresponding to the edges thereof, and which are suitable for
mass production, by previously desensitizing the edges of the aluminium support of
a PS plate.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
[0006] Fig. 1 is a schematic sectional view of a PS plate treated in accordance with this
invention, in which there are shown an aluminum support at 1, a sensitizing layer
at 2, and a coating film of hydrophilic polymeric compound at 3.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0007] According to this invention, PS plates can be produced by merely applying a desensitizing
solution to the cut ends of piled PS plates which have been cut into the same size.
This method is more suitable to mass production than the conventional method by which
the angle of the edge of the aluminum support is rounded off individually. The desensitizing
solution may be applied by a known method, e.g., by using a brush, sponge, roller,
or spray. In addition, the desensitizing solution may be applied to one cut end if
only one edge of the plate is involved in printing; but a desensitizing solution should
preferably be applied to two cut ends opposite to each other, more preferably to all
four cut ends, in anticipation of various printing modes.
[0008] The desensitizing solution to be applied to the cut ends of PS plates according to
this invention is a known desensitizing solution for aluminum-supported lithographic
printing plates. The preferred one is an aqueous solution containing a hydrophilic
organic polymeric compound. Examples of the hydrophilic organic polymeric compound
include gum arabic, dextrin, alginate (e.g., sodium alginate), water-soluble cellulose
(e.g., carboxymethylcellulose, hydroxyethylcellulose, and hydroxypropylmethylcellulose),
polyvinyl alcohol, polyvinyl pyrrolidone, polyacrylamide, water-soluble copolymer
containing acrylamide units, polyacrylic acid, copolymer containing acrylic acid units,
polymethacrylic acid, copolymer containing methacrylic acid units, copolymer of vinyl
methyl ether and maleic anhydride, copolymer of vinyl acetate and maleic anhydride,
and phosphoric acid modified starch. Preferable among them is gum arabic because of
its high desensitizing action. They may be used in combination with one another, as
occasion demands. They should be used in'concentration of about 5 to 40 wt%, preferably
8 to 30 wt% based on the total weight of the desensitizing solution.
[0009] The desensitizing solution used in this invention, which is an aqueous solution of
hydrophilic organic polymeric compound, should preferably be previously incorporated
with a metal salt of a strong acid which enhances the desensitizing action. Examples
of such a salt include sodium salt, potassium salt, magnesium salt, calcium salt,
and zinc salt of nitric acid; sodium salt, potassium salt, magnesium salt, calcium
salt, and zinc salt of sulfuric acid; sodium salt, potassium salt, magnesium salt,
calcium salt, and zinc salt of chromic acid; and sodium fluoride and potassium fluoride.
[0010] They may be used in combination with one another. They should be used in an amount
of about 0.01 to 5 wt% based on the total weight of the desensitizing solution.
[0011] When the hydrophilic polymeric compound contained in the desensitizing solution used
in this invention is gum arabic, the pH of the solution should be adjusted to the
acid range, preferably 1 to 5, particularly 2 to 4.5, by adding an acid. Therefore,
to the aqueous solution which is not acidic, acid should be added. Examples of acids
to be added for pH adjustment include mineral acids such as phosphoric acid, sulfuric
acid, and nitric acid, and organic acids such as citric acid, tannic acid, malic acid,
glacial acetic acid, lactic acid, oxalic acid, p-toluene sulfonic acid, and organic
phosphonic acid. Preferable among them is phosphoric acid because not only does it
function as a pH adjusting agent, but it also enhances the desensitizing action. The
acid should be used in an amount of 0.01 to 8 wt%, preferably 0.1 to 5 wt%, based
on the total weight of the desensitizing solution.
[0012] The desensitizing solution used in this invention should preferably be incorporated
with a wetting agent and/or surface active agent which improves the coatability of
the desensitizing solution. Examples of wetting agents include lower polyhydric alcohol
such as ethylene glycol, diethylene glycol, triethylene glycol, propylene glycol,
butylene glycol, pentane diole, hexylene glycol, tetraethylene glycol, polyethylene
glycol; dipropylene glycol, tripropylene glycol, glycerin, sorbitol, and pentaerythritol.
Preferable among them is glycerin. Examples of surface active agents include nonionic
surface active agents such as polyoxyethylene alkylphenyl ether and polyoxyethylene
polyoxypropylene blockcopolymer; anionic surface active agents such as fatty acid
salts, alkylsulfate ester salt, alkylbenzenesulfonate, alkylnaphthalenesulfonate,
dialkylsulfosuccinate ester salt, alkylphosphate ester salt, naphthalenesulfonic acid,
and formalin condensate; and betaine type, glycine type, alanine type, and sulfobetaine
type amphoteric surface active agents.
[0013] These wetting agents and/or surface active agents should be added in an amount of
about 0.5 to 10 wt%, preferably 1 to 5 wt%-, based on the total weight of the desensitizing
solution.
[0014] The desensitizing solution to be used in this invention may be incorporated with
a filler such as silicon dioxide, talc, and clay in an amount less than 2 wt% and
with a dye or pigment in an amount less than 1 wt%.
[0015] The desensitizing.solution used in this invention is an aqueous solution of hydrophilic
polymeric compound as mentioned above; however, an emulsion-type desensitizing solution
such as disclosed in U.S. Patent Nos. 4,253,999, 4,268,613, and 4,348,954 may be used.
It is used when there is the possibility that the sensitive layer of PS plate might
be adversely affected.
[0016] The application of the above-mentioned desensitizing solution to the cut ends of
PS plates may be accomplished by applying the solution to the edge of the individual
PS plates. However, it should preferably be accomplished -by applying the solution
to the cut ends of many piled PS plates (say, 1000 sheets) all at once. It is possible
to apply the solution to piled PS plates, each separated by interleaf, as described
in Japanese Patent Publication No. 23259/1982, corresponding to U.S. Patent 4,336,093
and Japanese Patent Application (OPI) No. 99647/1982 (The term "OPI" as used herein
refers to a "published unexamined Japanese Patent Application"), corresponding U.S.
Patent 4,403,030-. The desensitizing solution should preferably be applied to the
cut ends in a coating weight of about 50 to 150 g/m
2.
[0017] Fig. 1 is a schematic sectional view of a PS plate obtained as mentioned above. An
aluminum support 1 is covered with a sensitive layer 2, and both ends thereof are
covered with a coating 3 of hydrophilic polymeric compound formed by applying the
desensitizing solution.
[0018] This invention can be applied to various kinds of aluminum-supported PS plates, having
a sensitizing layer preferably composed of diazo resin and hydrophobic resin, a sensitizing
layer composed of o-quinonediazido compound and novolak resin, a sensitizing layer
of a photopolymerizable composition comprising addition-polymerizable unsaturated
monomer, photopolymerization initiator and binder of organic polymeric compound, or
a sensitizing layer of photosensitive resin which has the -CH=CH-CO- linkage in the
molecule and undergoes photocrosslinking reaction.
[0019] The invention is described in more detail with reference to the following, in which
"%" and "parts" mean "wt%" and "parts by weight", respectively, unless otherwise specified.
However, the scope of the invention is not limited to these examples.
. EXAMPLE 1
[0020] Positive type PS plates were prepared as follows: Aluminum supports 0.3 mm thick
which had undergone graining was partly etched by dipping in 2% sodium hydroxide aqueous
solution at 40°C for 1 minute. After rinsing, the aluminum supports were dipped in
sulfuric acid - chromic acid mixture for about 1 minute so that the surface of pure
aluminum was exposed. The aluminum supports were then anodized in 20% sulfuric acid
at 30°C for 2 minutes, at a voltage of 1.5 V DC and a current density of 3 A/dm
2, followed by rinsing and drying. The aluminum supports were continuously coated with
a sensitizing solution of the following composition in a coating weight of 2 g/m
2 (dry basis) by using a roll coater. The coating was dried at 100°C for 2 minutes.

[0021] Fifty sheets of the resulting PS plates were piled one over another with interleaf
inserted.
[0022] The interleaf was polyethylene-laminated (one side) paper composed of substrate paper
having a base weight of 50 g/m
2 and a 10-p thick polyethylene layer. It was inserted such a way that the polyethylene
layer contacted the photosensitive layer. The piled PS plates were cut to the size
of 1310 mm by 800 mm by using a guillotine cutter. The desensizing solution as mentioned
below was applied to the cut ends of the piled PS plates by using a sponge in a coating
weight of 70 g/m
2, followed by drying at room temperature.
Preparation of desensitizing solution
[0023] A desensitizing solution having a viscosity of 13 cps at pH 2.1 was prepared as follows:
61 parts of 30% aqueous solution of gum arabic was diluted with 30 parts of water.
To the resulting aqueous solution were added and dissolved 0.7 part of sodium hexametaphosphate,
1 part of sodium nitrate, 1.2 parts of magnesium sulfate, and 2.4 parts of 85% phosphoric
acid, with thorough stirring. Finally, 1.2 parts of polyoxyethylene-polyoxypropylene
block copolymer (trade name "pluronic") was added.
[0024] The PS plate prepared as above was exposed to "Fuji Film PS Light" placed 1 meter
away for 30 seconds through a transparent positive film by using a vacuum frame. (The
light source is Toshiba metal halide lamp, Type MU2000-2-OL, 3 kW, available from
Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd.) The exposed plate was developed by dipping in a developing
solution of the following composition.

[0025] The developed PS plates underwent gumming up with a 14° Be aqueous solution of gum
arabic. Two sheets of thus treated PS plates were attached side by side to an offset
rotary press. Ten thousand sheets were printed in the usual way. The printed matter
was satisfactory, with no scumming at the parts corresponding to the edges of the
plates.
[0026] For the purpose of comparison, the same PS plates as above were prepared, except
that the desensitizing solution was not applied to the cut ends of the PS plates,
and printing was carried out as above using the PS plates. The resulting printed matter
had scumming at the parts which came into contact with the edges of the plate.
EXAMPLE 2
[0027] PS plates were prepared as follows: Aluminum supports 0.15 mm thick were degreased
with an aqueous solution of sodium phosphate. The degreased aluminum supports were
electrolytically grained at a current density of 3 A/m
2 in a hydrochloric acid bath and then anodized in a sulfuric acid bath. The aluminum
supports were treated with an aqueous solution of sodium metasilicate for sealing.
The aluminum supports thus obtained were coated with a sensitizing solution of the
following composition in a coating weight of 2.5 g/m
2 (dry basis), by using a whirler, followed by drying at 100°C for 2 minutes.

[0028] The PS plates thus prepared were cut and the desensitizing solution was applied to
the cut ends in the same way as in Example 1.
[0029] The PS plates were exposed for 40 seconds to a 3 kW metal halide lamp placed 1 meter
away through a transparent negative film. The exposed PS plates were developed by
dipping in a developing solution of the following composition, with light rubbing
with a sponge.

[0030] The developed PS plates underwent gumming up with a 14° Be aqueous solution of gum
arabic. Two sheets of thus treated PS plates were attached side by side to an offset
rotary press. Fifty thousand sheets were printed in the usual way. The printed matter
was satisfactory, with no scumming at the parts corresponding to the edges of the
plate.
EXAMPLES 3 to 5
[0031] Example 1 was repeated, except that the following desensitizing solutions A, B, and
C were used. In all cases, the printed matter was satisfactory, with no scumming at
the parts corresponding to the edges of the plate.
Desensitizing solution A
[0032] Into 70 parts of 30% aqueous solution of gum arabic were dissolved 5.6 parts of 85%
phosphoric acid, 1.4 parts of sodium nitrate, 0.7 part of zinc nitrate, and 1.3 parts
of magnesium sulfate. The resulting solution was mixed with 14 parts of petroleum
solvent ("K-solvent") and 7.0 parts of polyoxyethylene nonylphenyl ether ("Emulgen
903"). Thus there was obtained an emulsion-type desensitizing solution A.
Desensitizing solution B
[0033] Into 61.9 parts of water was dissolved 9.3 parts of carboxymethyl cellulose. Into
the resulting solution were dissolved 12.4 parts of magnesium nitrate, 12.4 parts
of sodium nitrate and 4 parts of 85% phosphoric acid. Thus there was obtained desensitizing
solution B.
Desensitizing solution C
[0034] To 40 parts of water was added 36 parts of 30% aqueous solution of gum arabic. Into
the resulting solution were dissolved 17 parts of dextrin, 2.4 parts of glycerin,
0.6 part of 85% phosphoric acid, and 0.4 part of sodium nitrate. To the solution were
further added 1.2 parts of polyoxyethylene nonylphenyl ether, 2.4 parts of dioctylsulfosuccinic
acid, and 0.6 part of 2-phosphonobutane tricarboxylic acid. Thus there was obtained
desensitizing solution C.
EXAMPLES 6 to 8
[0035] Example 2 was repeated, except that the desensi- izing solutions A, B, and C used
in Examples 3 to 5 were used. In all the cases, the printed matter was satisfactory,
with no scumming at the parts corresponding to the edges of the plate.
[0036] While the invention has been described in detail and with reference to specific embodiments
thereof, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that various changes and modifications
can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope thereof.
1. A light-sensitive lithographic printing plate precursor, comprising an aluminum
support with a hydrophilic surface and a photosensitive layer formed thereon;
the aluminum support having a cut edge treated with a desensitizing solution.
2. A light-sensitive lithographic printing plate precursor as-claimed in Claim 1,
wherein two cut edges of the support which are opposite to each other are treated
with the desensitizing solution.
3. A light-sensitive lithographic printing plate precursor as claimed in Claim 1,
wherein all cut edges of the support are treated with the desensitizing solution..
,
4. A light-sensitive lithographic printing plate precursor as claimed in Claim 1,
wherein the desensitizing solution is an aqueous solution containing a hydrophilic
organic polymeric compound.
5. A light-sensitive lithographic printing plate precursor as claimed in Claim 4,
wherein the hydrophilic organic polymeric compound is gum arabic.
6. A light-sensitive lithographic printing plate as claimed in Claim 4, wherein the
hydrophilic organic polymeric compound is present in the aqueous solution in an amount
in the range of 5 wt% to 40 wt%.
7. A light-sensitive lithographic printing plate precursor as claimed in Claim 6,
wherein the hydrophilic organic polymeric compound is present in the aqueous solution
in an amount in the range of 8 wt%.to 30 wt% based on the total weight of the desensitizing
solution.
8. A light-sensitive lithographic printing plate precursor as claimed in Claim 4,
wherein the aqueous solution includes a metal salt of a strong acid in an amount in
the range of 0.01 wt% to 5 wt% based on the total weight of the desensitizing solution.
9. A light-sensitive lithographic printing plate precursor as claimed in Claim 1,
wherein the desensitizing solution is present on the cut edge in an amount in the
range of 50 g/m2 to 150 g/m2.
10. A light-sensitive lithographic printing plate precursor comprising an aluminium
support (1) with a hydrophilic layer (2) formed thereon, the aluminium support (1)
having at least one cut edge having a coating (3) of a desensitizing compound.