[0001] This application is a continuation-in-part of copending application Serial No. 473,841
filed March 9, 1983, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference
and which is a continuation-in
-part of application Serial No. 356,665 filed March 10, 1982, now abandoned.
[0002] This invention relates to compositions useful as lubricating oils having high viscosity
index, improved resistance to oxidative degradation and resistance to viscosity losses
caused by permanent or temporary shear.
[0003] According to the instant invention a lubricating composition is provided comprising
(1) an hydrogenated polyisoprene having a viscosity of 1000 to 3500 centistokes at
100°C; (2) a low viscosity synthetic hydrocarbon, such as alkyl benzene or low viscosity
polyalphaolefin and/or a low viscosity ester, such as monoesters, diesters, polyesters,
and optionally (3) an additive package.
[0004] A further object of the invention is to provide a lubricating composition with properties
not obtainable with conventional polymeric thickeners.
[0005] A further object of the invention is to provide lubricating compositions exhibiting
improved shear stability, oxidative stability and excellent temperature-viscosity
properties.
[0006] The viscosity-temperature relationship of a lubricating oil is one of the critical
criteria which must be considered when selecting a lubricant for a particular application.
The mineral oils commonly used as a base for single and multigraded lubricants exhibit
a relatively large change in viscosity with a change in temperature. Fluids exhibiting
such a relatively large change in viscosity with temperature are said to have a low
viscosity index. The viscosity index of a common paraffinic mineral oil is usually
given a value of about 100. Viscosity index (VI) is determined according to ASTM Method
D 2770-74 wherein the VI is related to kinematic viscosities measured at 40°C and
100°C.
[0007] Lubricating oils composed mainly of mineral oil are said to be single graded. SAE
grading requires that oils have a certain minimum viscosity at high temperatures and,
to be multigraded, a certain maximum viscosity at low temperatures. For instance,
an oil having a viscosity of 10 cSt. at 100°C (hereinafter all viscosities are at
100°C unless otherwise noted) would be an SAE 30 and if that oil had a viscosity of
3400 cP. at -20°C, the oil would be graded 10W-30. An unmodified mineral oil of 10
cSt. can not meet the low temperature requirements for a 10W-30 multigrade rating,
since its viscosity index dictates that it would have a viscosity considerably greater
than 3500 cP. at -20°C, which is the maximum allowed viscosity for a 10W rating.
[0008] The viscosity requirements for qualification as multigrade engine oils are described
by the SAE Engine Oil Viscosity Classification - SAE J300 SEP80, which became effective
April 1, 1982. The low temperature (W) viscosity requirements are determined by ASTM
D 2602, Method of Test for Apparent Viscosity of Motor Oils at Low Temperature Using
the Cold Cranking Simulator, and the results are reported in centipoise (cP). The
higher temperature (100°C) viscosity is measured according to ASTM D445, Method of
Test for Kinematic Viscosity of Transparent and Opaque Liquids, and the results are
reported in centistokes (cSt.). The following table outlines the high and low temperature
requirements for the recognized SAE grades for engine oils.

[0009] In a similar manner, SAE J306c describes the viscometric qualifications for axle
and manual transmission lubricants. High temperature (100°C) viscosity measurements
are performed according to ASTM D445. The low temperature viscosity values are determined
according to ASTM D2983, Method of Test for Apparent Viscosity at Low Temperature
Using the Brookfield Viscometer and these results are reported in centipoise (cP),
where (cP) and (cSt) are related as follows :

[0010] The following table summarizes the high and low temperature requirements for qualification
of axle and manual transmission lubricants.

[0011] It is obvious from these tables that the viscosity index of a broadly multigraded
oil such as 5W-40 or 70W-140 will require fluids having considerably higher viscosity
index than narrowly multigraded lubricants such as 10W-30. The viscosity index requirements
for different multigraded fluids can be approximated by the use of ASTM Standard Viscosity-Tempearture
Charts for Liquid Petroleum Products (D 341).
[0012] If one assumes that extrapolation of the high temperature (40°C. and 100°C) viscosities
to -40°C or below is linear on chart D 341, then a line connecting a 100°C viscosity
of, for example, 12.5 cSt. and a low temperature viscosity of 3500 cP at -25°C would
give the correct 40°C viscosity and permit an approximation of the minimum viscosity
index required for that particular grade of oil (10W-40).
[0013] The 40°C viscosity estimated by linearly connecting the 100°C and -25°C viscosities
would be about 70 cSt. The viscosity index of an oil having K.V.
100 = 12.5 cSt. and K.V.40 = 70 cSt. would be about 180 (ASTM D 2270-74). Unless the
-25°C viscosity of a fluid is lower than the linear relationship illustrated, then
an oil must have a viscosity index of at least 180 to even potentially qualify as
a 10W-40 oil.
[0014] In actual fact, many V.I. improved oils have viscosities at -25°C which are considerably
greater than predicted by linear extrapolation of the K.V.
100 and K.V.
40 values. Therefore, even having a V.I. of 180 does not guarantee the blend would be
a 5W-40 oil.
[0015] Using this technique minimum viscosity index requirements for various grades of crankcase
or gear oils can be estimated. A few typical estimations are shown in the following
table:

[0016] It can thus be seen that preparation of very broadly graded lubricants, such as 5W-40
or 75W-250 requires thickeners which produce very high viscosity indices in the final
blends.
[0017] It has been the practice to improve the viscosity index of mineral oils or low viscosity
synthetic oils by adding a polymeric thickener to relatively non-viscous base fluids.
Polymeric thickeners are commonly used in the production of multigrade lubricants.
Typical polymers used as thickeners include hydrogenated styreneisoprene block copolymers,
rubbers based on ethylene and propylene (OCP), polymers produced by polymerizing high
molecular weight esters of the acrylate series, polyisobutylene and the like. These
polymeric thickeners are added to bring the viscosity of a base fluid up to that required
for a certain SAE grade and to increase the viscosity index of the fluid, allowing
the production of multigraded oils. Polymeric VI improvers are traditionally high
molecular weight rubbers whose molecular weights may vary from 10,000 to 1,000,000.
Since the thickening power and VI increase are related to the molecular weight of
the VI improver, most of these polymers normally have a molecular weight of at least
100,000.
[0018] The use of these high molecular weight VI improvers, in the production of multigraded
lubricants has some serious drawbacks :
1. They are very sensitive to oxidation, which results in a loss of VI and thickening
power and frequently in the formation of unwanted deposits.
2. They are sensitive to large viscosity losses from mechanical shear when exposed
to the high shear rates and stresses encountered in crankcases or gears.
3. They are susceptible to a high degree of temporary shear.
[0019] Temporary shear is the result of the non-Newtonian viscometrics associated with solutions
of high molecular weight polymers. It is caused by an alignment of the polymer chains
with the shear field under high shear rates with a resultant decrease in viscosity.
The decreased viscosity reduces the wear protection associated with viscous oils.
Newtonian fluids maintain their viscosity regardless of shear rate.
[0020] We have found that certain combinations of fluids and additives can be used to prepare
multigraded lubricants which outperform prior art formulations and have none or a
greatly decreased amount of the above listed deficiencies found in polymerically thickened
oils.
[0021] Certain specific blends of high viscosity hydrogenated polyisoprene, low viscosity
synthetic hydrocarbons and/or low viscosity esters form base fluids from which superior
crankcase or gear oils can be produced by the addition of the proper additive "packages".
The finished oils thus prepared exhibit very high stability to permanent shear and,
because of their nearly Newtonian nature, very little, if any, temporary shear and
so maintain the viscosity required for proper wear protection. The oils of this invention
have remarkably better stability toward oxidative degradation than those of the prior
art. The unexpectedly high viscosity indices produced from our base fluid blends permit
the preparation of broadly multigraded crankcase fluids, such as 5W-40 and gear oils
such as 75W-140. Up to now it has been difficult if not impossible, to prepare such
lubricants without the use of frequently harmful amounts of polymeric V.I. improvers.
[0022] The oligomeric polyisoprenes of this invention may be prepared by Ziegler or, preferably,
anionic polymerization. Such polymerization techniques are described in United States
Patent 4,060,492.
[0023] For the purposes of this invention, the preferred method of preparation for the liquid
hydrogenated polyisoprenes is by the anionic alkyl lithium catalyzed polymerization
of isoprene. Many references are available to those familiar with this art which describe
the use of such catalysts and procedures. The use of alkyl lithium catalysts such
as secondary butyl lithium results in a polyisoprene oligomer having a very high (usually
greater than 80%) 1,4-content, which results in backbone unsaturation.
[0024] When alkyl lithium catalysts are modified by the addition of ethers or amines, a
controlled amount of 1,2- and 3,4- addition can take place in the polymerization.

[0026] Structure (A) is the preferred structure because of its low Tg and because it has
a lower percent of its mass in- the pendant groups (CH
3-). Structure (B) is deficient in that the tetrasubsti- tuted carbons produced serve
as points of thermal instability. Structure (C) has 60% of its mass in a pendant (isopropyl)
group which, if repeated decreases the thickening power of the oligomer for a given
molecular weight and also raises the Tg of the resultant polymer. This latter property
has been shown to correlate with viscosity index. Optimization of structure (A) is
desired for the best combination of thickening power, stability and V.I. improvement
properties.
[0027] Another feature of alkyl lithium polymers is the ease with which molecular weight
and molecular weight distribution can be controlled. The molecular weight is a direct
function of the monomer to catalyst ratio and, taking the proper precautions to exclude
impurities, can be controlled very accurately thus assuring good quality control in
the production of such polymer. The alkyl lithium catalysts produce very narrow molecular
weight distributions such that Mw/Mn ratios of 1.1 are easily gained. For V.I. improvers
a narrow molecular weight distribution is highly desirable since, at the given molecular
weight, thickening power is maximized while oxidative and shear instability are minimized.
If desired, broad or even polymodal M.W. distributions are easily produced by a variety
of techniques well known in the art. Star-shaped or branched polymers can also be
readily prepared by the inclusion of multifunctional monomers such as divinyl benzene
or by termination of the "living" chains with a polyfunctional coupling agent such
as dimethylterephthalate.
[0028] It is well known that highly unsaturated polymers are considerably less stable than
saturated polymers toward oxidation. It is important, therefore, that the amount of
unsaturation present in the polyisoprenes be drastically reduced. This is accomplished
easily by anyone skilled in the art using, for instance, a Pt, Pd or Ni catalyst in
a pressurized hydrogen atmosphere at elevated temperature.
[0029] Regardless of the mode of preparation, isoprene oligomers require hydrogenation to
reduce the high level of unsaturation present after polymerization. For optimum oxidation
stability, 90%, and preferably 99% or more of the olefinic linkages should be saturated.
[0030] The low viscosity synthetic hydrocarbons of the present invention, having viscosities
of from 1 to 10 cSt., consist primarily of oligomers of alphaolefins and alkylated
benzenes.
[0031] Low molecular weight oligomers of alphaolefins from C
8 (octene) to C
12 (dodecene) or mixtures of the olefins can be utilized. Low viscosity alphaolefin
oligomers can be produced by Ziegler catalysis, thermal polymerization, free radically
catalyzed polymerization and, preferably, BF
3 catalyzed polymerization. A host of similar processes involving BF
3 in conjunction with a cocatalyst is known in the patent literature. A typical polymerization
technique is described in United States Patent No. 4,045,508.
[0032] The alkylbenzenes may be used in the present invention alone or in conjunction with
low viscosity polyalphaolefins in blends with high viscosity synthetic hydrocarbons
and low viscosity esters. The alkylbenzenes, prepared by Friedel-Crafts alkylation
of benzene with olefins are usually predominantly dialkylbenzenes wherein the alkyl
chain may be 6 to 14 carbon atoms long. The alkylating olefins used in the preparation
of alkylbenzenes can be straight or branched chain olefins or combinations. These
materials may be prepared as shown in U.S.P. 3,909,432.
[0033] The low viscosity esters of this invention, having viscosities of from 1 to 10 cSt.
can be selected from classes of esters readily available commercially, e.g., monoesters
prepared from monobasic acids such as pelargonic acid and alcohols; diesters prepared
from dibasic acids and alcohols or from diols and monobasic acids or mixtures of acids;
and polyol esters prepared from diols, triols (especially trimethylol propane), tetraols
(such as pentaerythritol), hexaols (such as dipentaerythritol) and the like reacted
with monobasic acids or mixtures of acids.
[0034] Examples of such esters include tridecyl pelargonate, di-2-ethylhexyl adipate, di-2-ethylhexyl
azelate, trimethylolpropane triheptanoate and pentaerythritol tetraheptanoate.
[0035] An alternative to the synthetically produced esters described above are those esters
and mixtures of esters derived from natural sources, plant or animal. Examples of
these materials are the fluids produced from jojoba nuts, tallows, safflowers and
sperm whales.
[0036] The esters used in our blends ought to be carefully selected to insure compatibility
of all components in finished lubricants of this invention. If esters having a high
degree of polarity (roughly indicated by oxygen content) are blended with certain
combinations of high viscosity synthetic hydrocarbons and low viscosity synthetic
hydrocarbons, phase separation can occur at low temperatures with a resultant increase
in apparent viscosity. Such phase separation is, of course, incompatible with long
term storage of lubricants under a variety of temperature conditions.
[0037] The additive "packages" mixed with the recommended base oil blend for the production
of multigraded crankcase fluids or gear oils are usually combination of various types
of chemical additives so chosen to operate best under the use conditions which the
particular formulated fluid may encounter.
[0038] Additives can be classified as materials which either impart or enhance a desirable
property of the base lubricant blend into which they are incorporated. While the general
nature of the additives might be the same for various types or blends of the base
lubricants, the specific additives chosen will depend on the particular type of service
in which the lubricant is employed and the characteristics of the base lubricants.
[0039] The main types of current day additives are:
1. Dispersants,
2. Oxidation and Corrosion Inhibitors,
3. Anti-Wear Agents,
4. Viscosity Improvers,
5. Pour Point Depressants,
6. Anti-Rust Compounds, and
7. Foam Inhibitors.
[0040] Normally a finished lubricant will contain several and possibly most or all of the
above types of additives in what is commonly called an "additive package. The development
of a balanced additive package involves considerably more work than the casual use
of each of the additive types. Quite often functional difficulties arising from combinations
of these materials show up under actual operating conditions. On the other hand, certain
unpredictable synergistic effects of a desirable nature may also become evident. The
only methods currently available for obtaining such data are from extensive full scale
testing both in the laboratory and in the field. Such testing is costly and time-consuming.
[0041] Dispersants have been described in the literature as "detergents". Since their function
appears to be one of effecting a dispersion of particulate matter, rather than one
of "cleaning up" any existing dirt and debris, it is more appropriate to categorize
them as dispersants. Materials of this type are generally molecules having a large
hydrocarbon "tail" and a polar group head. The tail section, an oleophilic group,
serves as a solubilizer in the base fluid while the polar group serves as the element
which is attracted to particulate contaminants in the lubricant.
[0042] The dispersants include metallic and ashless types. The metallic dispersants include
sulfonates (products of the neutralization of a sulfonic acid with a metallic base),
thiophosphonates (acidic components derived from the reaction between polybutene and
phosphous pentasulfide) and phenates and phenol sulfide salts (the broad class of
metal phenates includes the salts of alk
yl
phen- ols, alkylphenol sulfides, and alkyl phenol aldehyde products). The ashless type
dispersants may be categorized into two broad types: high molecular weight polymeric
dispersants for the formulation of multigrade oils and lower molecular weight additives
for use where viscosity improvement is not necessary. The compounds useful for this
purpose are again characterized by a "polar" group attached to a relatively high molecular
weight hydrocarbon chain. The "polar" group generally contains one or more of the
elements--nitrogen, oxygen, and phosphorus. The solubilizing chains are generally
higher in molecular weight than those employed in the metallic types; however, in
some instances they may be quite similar. Some examples are N-substituted long chain
alkenyl succinimides, high molecular weight esters, such as products formed by the
esterification of mono or polyhydric aliphatic alcohols with olefin substituted succinic
acid, and Mannich bases from high molecular weight alkylated phenols.
[0043] The high molecular weight polymeric ashless dispersants have the general formula:
where 0 = Oleophilic Group
P = Polar Group
R = Hydrogen or Alkyl Group
[0044] The function of an oxidation inhibitor is the prevention of a deterioration associated
with oxygen attack on the lubricant base fluid. These inhibitors function either to
destroy free radicals (chain breaking) or to interact with peroxides which are involved
in the oxidation mechanism. Among the widely used anti-oxidants are the phenolic types
(chain-breaking) e.g., 2,6-di-tert.-butyl para cresol and 4,4' methylenebis(2,6-di-tert.-butylphenol),
and the zinc dithiophosphates (peroxide-destroying).
[0045] Wear is loss of metal with subsequent change in clearance between surfaces moving
relative to each other. If continued, it will result in engine or gear malfunction.
Among the principal factors causing wear are metal-to-metal contact, presence of abrasive
particulate matter, and attack of corrosive acids.
[0046] Metal-to-metal contact can be prevented by the addition of film-forming compounds
which protect the surface either by physical absorption or by chemical reaction. The
zinc dithiophosphates are widely used for this purpose. These compounds were described
under anti-oxidant and anti-bearing corrosion additives. Other effective additives
contain phosphorus, sulfur or combinations of these elements.
[0047] Abrasive wear can be prevented by effective removal of particulate matter by filtration
while corrosive wear from acidic materials can be controlled by the use of alkaline
additives such as basic phenates and sulfonates.
[0048] Although conventional viscosity improvers are often used in "additive packages" their
use should not be necessary for the practice of this invention since our particular
blends of high and low molecular weight base lubricants produce the same effect. However,
we do not want to exclude the possibility of adding some amounts of conventional viscosity
improvers. These materials are usually oil-soluble organic polymers with molecular
weights ranging from approximately 10,000 to 1,000,000. The polymer molecule in solution
is swollen by the lubricant. The volume of this swollen entity determines the degree
to which the polymer increases its viscosity.
[0049] Pour point depressants prevent the congelation of the oil at low temperatures. This
phenomenon is associated with the crystallization of waxes from the lubricants. Chemical
structures of representative commercial pour point depressants are:

[0050] Chemicals employed as rust inhibitors include sulfonates, alkenyl succinic acids,
substituted imidazolines, amines, and amine phosphates.
[0051] The anti-foam agents include the silicones and miscellaneous organic copolymers.
[0052] Additive packages known to perform adequately for their recommended purpose are prepared
and supplied by several major manufacturers. The percentage and type of additive to
be used in each application is recommended by the suppliers. Typically available packages
are:
1. HITEC [Trademark] E-320 for use in automotive gear oils,
2. Lubrizol [Trademark] 5002 for use in industrial gear oils,
3. Lubrizol 4856 supplied by the Lubrizol Corp. for use in gasoline crankcase oil,
and
4. OLOA [Trademark] 8717 for use in diesel crankcase oils.
[0053] A typical additive package for an automotive gear lubricant would normally contain
antioxidant, corrosion inhibitor, anti-wear agents, anti-rust agents, extreme pressure
agent and foam inhibitor.
[0054] A typical additive package for a crankcase lubricant would normally be comprised
of a dispersant, antioxidant, corrosion inhibitor, anti-wear agent, anti-rust agent
and foam inhibitor.
[0055] An additive package useful for formulating a compressor fluid would typically contain
an anti-oxidant, anti-wear agent, an anti-rust agent and foam inhibitor.
[0056] This invention uses blends of HPI having a viscosity-range of 1000 to 3500 cSt. with
one or more synthetic hydrocarbon fluids having viscosities in the range of 1 to 10
cSt. and/or one or more compatible ester fluids having a viscosity range of 1 to 10
cSt. Such blends, when treated with a properly chosen additive "package", can be formulated
in broad range multigraded crankcase or gear oils having improved shear stability,
improved oxidative stability, and nearly Newtonian viscometric properties. The blends
of this invention also find uses in certain applications where no additive need be
employed.
[0057] In discussing the constitution of the base oil blend, it is convenient to normalize
the percentages of HPI, low viscosity synthetic hydrocarbons, and low viscosity esters
in the final lubricant so that they total 100%. The actual percentages used in the
final formulation would then be decreased depending on the amount of additive packages
utilized.
[0058] Each of the ingredients, HPI, low viscosity synthetic hydrocarbons, and low viscosity
esters are essential parts of this invention. The HPI provides thickening and V.I.
improvement to the base oil blend. The V.I. improvement produced by HPI in blends
with low viscosity synthetic hydrocarbons or low viscosity esters is shown in the
examples.
[0059] The low viscosity synthetic hydrocarbon fluid is frequently the main ingredient in
the base oil blend, particularly in finished lubricants having an SAE viscosity grade
of 30 or 40. While certain low viscosity esters are insoluble in (high viscosity)
HPI, the presence of low viscosity synthetic hydrocarbon, being a better solvent for
low viscosity esters, permits greater variations in the type of esters used in base
oil blends of high viscosity synthetic hydrocarbons, low viscosity synthetic hydrocarbons,
and low viscosity esters.
[0060] Crankcase and gear oils consisting solely of hydrogenated polyisoprene oligomers
and low viscosity synthetic hydrocarbons with the proper additives produce synthetic
fluids having excellent oxidative and hydrolytic stability. Such fluids are exemplified
in
Example 3.
[0061] The third optional component, low viscosity esters can be used in combination with
hydrogenated polyisoprene oligomers - and low viscosity hydrocarbons or alone with
hydrogenated polyisoprene oligomers. In the three component blend the proper choice
of ester and hydrogenated polyisoprene oligomers can produce crankcase and gear oil
formulations having outstanding viscosity indices and low temperature properties.
Such three component blends are illustrated in Examples 1 and 2.
[0062] Two component blends of hydrogenated polyisoprene oligomers and esters can be used
to prepare multigraded lubricants having outstanding viscometric properties, detergency,
and oxidative stability. While some applications present environments having high
moisture levels, which would be deleterious to certain esters, there are other applications
such as automotive gear oils where the high ester contents found in the hydrogenated
polyisoprene oligomers- ester blends can be used to advantage. Example 4 illustrates
the formulation of multigrade lubricants with such two component blends.
[0063] When it is deemed advantageous to use a low viscosity ester as part of the blend,
the low viscosity hydrocarbons act as a common solvent for the HPI and the added ester.
Depending on the polarity of the ester, the latter two are frequently somewhat incompatible.
Excellent multigraded lubricants can be formulated with or without ester.
[0064] The third component, low viscosity esters, can be added to produce the superior lubricants
of this invention. HPI and low viscosity synthetic hydrocarbons can be used alone
to produce multigraded lubricants. The addition of low levels of low viscosity esters,
usually 1-25% results in a base oil blend superior to blends of high viscosity synthetic
hydrocarbons and low viscosity synthetic hydrocarbons alone in low temperature fluidity.
[0065] Low viscosity esters usually constitute 10-25% of the synthetic base oil blend, more
or less can be used in specific formulations. When the final application involves
exposure to moisture elimination or limitation of the amount of ester in blends may
be advantageous.
[0066] The components of the finished lubricants of this invention can be admixed in any
convenient manner or sequence.
[0067] An important aspect of the present invention is in the use of the properly constituted
base oil blend in combination with the proper compatible additive package to produce
finished broad range multigrade lubricants having: -
1. Improved temporary shear stability.
2. Excellent oxidation stability.
3. High viscosity index.
[0068] The range of percentages for each of the components, i.e., HPI, low viscosity synthetic
hydrocarbons, low viscosity esters, and additive packages, will vary widely depending
on the end use for the formulated lubricant, but the benefits of the compositions
of this invention accrue when the base oil blend contains (normalized):
From 1 to 99% HPI from 1 to 99% low viscosity synthetic hydrocarbons esters or mixtures
thereof. It is preferred to blend from 3 to 80% HPI with correspondingly 90 to 20%
of at least one low viscosity ester base fluid or hydrocarbon base fluid. The additive
package can be used in from 0 to 25% of the total formulation, all by weight.
[0069] The lubricants of this invention approach viscometrics of Newtonian fluids. That
is, their viscosities are changed little over a wide range of shear rates. While the
HPI of the invention may, in themselves, display non-Newtonian characteristics, particularly
at low temperatures, the final lubricant products utilizing low viscosity oils as
diluents are nearly Newtonian.
[0070] The non-Newtonian character of currently used V.I. improvers is well documented.
An excellent discussion can be found in an SAE publication entitled, "The Relationship
Between Engine Oil Viscosity and Engine Performance--Part III." The papers in this
publication were presented at a 1978 SAE Congress and Exposition in Detroit on February
27 to March 3, 1978.
[0071] The reference of interest is Paper 780374:
"Temporary Viscosity Loss and its Relationship to Journal Bearing Performance," M.L.
McMillan and C.K. Murphy, General Motors Research Labs.
[0072] This reference, and many others familiar to researchers in the field, illustrates
how commercial polymeric VI improvers of molecular weights from 30,000 and up all
show a temporary viscosity loss when subjected to shear rates of 10 to 10 sec
-1. The temporary shear loss is greater for any shear rate with higher molecular weight
polymers. For instance, oils thickened to the same viscosity with polymethacrylates
of 32,000; 157,000; and 275,000 molecular weight show percentage losses in viscosity
at a 5 x 10
5 sec 1 shear rate of 10, 22 and 32%, respectively.
[0073] The HPI's of this invention have molecular weights below 5000, and shear thinning
of their solutions is minimal.
[0074] The shear rates developed in pistons and gears (equal to or greater than 10
6 sec 1) is such that, depending on the polymeric thickener used, the apparent viscosity
of the oils approaches that of the unthickened base fluids resulting in loss of hydrodynamic
films. Since wear protection of moving parts has been correlated with oil viscosity,
it is apparent that the wear characteristics of a lubricant can be downgraded as a
result of temporary shear. The nearly Newtonian fluids of this invention maintain
their viscosity under these use conditions and therefore afford more protection to
and longer lifetime for the machinery being lubricated.
[0075] The currently used polymeric thickeners which show temporary (recoverable) shear
are also subject to permanent shear. Extended use of polymeric thickeners leads to
their mechanical breakdown with resultant loss in thickening power and decrease in
VI. This is illustrated in Example 5. Paper 780372 (op. cit), "Polymer Stability in
Engines" by W. Wunderlich and H. Jost discusses the relationship between polymer type
and permanent shear. The multigrade lubricants of this invention are not as susceptible
to mechanical shear.
[0076] This same paper also recognizes an often overlooked feature of high molecular weight
polymeric VI improvers, i.e., their instability toward oxidation. Just as these polymers
lose viscosity by shear they are also readily degraded by oxygen with the resultant
breakdown of the polymer and decrease in viscosity index. The lubricating fluids of
this invention suffer much less change in viscosity index upon oxidation.
[0077] As mentioned earlier, the small amount of temporary shear exhibited by the lubricants
of this invention guarantees optimum viscosity for the protection of moving parts
where high shear rates are encountered. The importance of this feature is widely recognized.
In the past, SAE grading (e.g. SAE 30) relied only on a measurement of the viscosity
of a fluid at 100°C under low shear conditions, despite the fact that in machinery
such as a crankcase high temperatures and very high shear rates are encountered. This
disparity has led to the adoption in Europe of a new grading system wherein viscosities
for a certain grade are those measured at 150
0C and 10
6 sec shear rate. This more realistic approach is currently being considered in the
United States. The advantages a Newtonian fluid brings to such a grading system are
obvious to anyone skilled in the art. The viscosity of a Newtonian fluid can be directly
extrapolated to 150°C under high shear conditions. A polymer thickened fluid, however,
will invariably have a viscosity lower than the extrapolated value, frequently close
to the base fluid itself. In order to attain a certain grade under high shear conditions,
polymer thickened oils will require a more viscous base fluid. The use of thicker
base fluids will produce higher viscosities at low temperature making it more difficult
to meet the low temperature (5W for crankcase of 75W for gear oil) requirements for
broadly multigraded oils.
[0078] Stated another way, current high molecular weight VI improvers "artificially" improve
the viscosity index, since realistic high temperature high shear measurements are
not utilized in determining VI. Viscosity index is determined by low shear viscosity
measurements at 40°C and 100°C. The nearly Newtonian lubricants of this invention
not only produce high viscosity index multigraded fluids which stay "in grade", but
the VI and multigrade rating are realistic since they are not very sensitive to shear.
[0079] While the specific compositions exemplified in this patent are fairly precise, it
should be obvious to anyone skilled in the art to produce even further combinations
within the scope of this invention which will be valuable lubricants.
[0080] The following examples illustrate some of the blends encompassed by our invention:
EXAMPLE 1
[0081] This example illustrates the preparation of crankcase lubricants using hydrogenated
polyisoprene (HPI) of the viscosities shown:

[0082] The lubricants had the properties shown:

EXAMPLE 2
[0083] This example illustrates the preparation of automotive gear lubricants using HPI's
of the kinematic viscosities shown:

[0084] The lubricants had the properties shown:

EXAMPLE 3
[0085] This example illustrates the preparation of lubricants with HPI's of the kinematic
viscosities shown in blends with only synthetic hydrocarbon and additive package:

[0086] The lubricants had the properties shown:

EXAMPLE 4
[0087] This example illustrates the preparation of lubricants with HPO's of the kinematic
viscosities shown in blends with only esters and additive package:

The lubricants had the properties shown:
