BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
A. Field of the Invention
[0001] This invention relates to novel conjugate filaments and to novel processes for producing
conjugate filaments. In particular, the invention relates to novel polyamide conjugate
filaments having a high level of "high-load" crimp and to a novel process for producing
such filaments.
[0002] The term "high-load crimp" as used herein means crimp (e.g., helical coils) being
developed and/or retained during performance of the high-load crimp test hereafter
defined. The term "low-load crimp" means crimp developed and/or retained during performance
of the low-load crimp test hereinafter defined.
B. Description of the Prior Art
[0003] Conjugate filaments and their preparation are well known in the art. Typically, their
preparation comprises two completely separate and discontinuous operations; a melt
spinning operation in which two different polymers are co-extruded to form as-spun
filaments which are wound onto a bobbin to form a package, and a stretching operation
in which the as-spun filaments are withdrawn from the bobbin, stretched and then wound
onto a second bobbin to once again form a package. The polymers may differ from one
another with respect to, for example, their chemical structure (e.g., see U.S. Patent
4,019,311) or the polymers may have the same structure and be different because of
a difference in relative viscosity (e.g., see U.S. Patent 3,536,802) or because one
polymer contains an additive that changes its morphology and the other polymer does
not (e.g., see US Patent 4,271,233). US Patents 4,244,907 and 4,202,854 describe a
process for producing conjugate filaments wherein, instead of co-extruding two polymers,
a single polymer is extruded to form a monocomponent molten stream that is treated,
such as by subjecting the stream to one-aided cooling before it is completely solidified
(e.g., see US Patent 4,244,907 or to one-sided heating immediately after it ia solidified
(e.g., see US Patent 4,202,854). In these instances the filament is stretched immediately
after the one-sided treatment.
[0004] Conjugate filamenta prepared by the prior art processes, in general, lack the ability
to develop crimp characteristics of the type required of filaments used in the construction
of "stretch" garments such as leg hose, pantyhose, athletic wear, leotards, etc. For
this reason most filaments heretofore used commercially for stretch garment applications
are monocomponent nylon 66 or nylon 6 filazents that have been mechanically false-twist
textured. Although the polyamide conjugate filaments described in US Patents 3,399,108
and 3,418,199 have the ability to develop adequate crimp having char- acteriatica
of the type required for stretch garment applications, the filaments are lacking in
other respects as compared to the false-twist textured monocomponent nylon filaments.
For example, the monocomponent filaments have lower boiling water shrinkage values
and, therefore, offer greater dimensional stability to garments, such as hose, where
the crimp is developed after the hose are knitted. Also, the crimp of the monocomponent
filaments can be developed in the dye bath during conventional garment dyeing operations
(i.e., in boiling water at atmospheric pressure), whereas the crimp of these conjugate
filaments require a special treatment, i.e., superheated steam (118°C).
SUMMARY OF THE INTENTION
[0005] The present invention relates to novel processes for producing conjugate filaments
and to novel conjugate filasents. More apecifically, the invention provides a simple
and economical process for producing conjugate filaments having improved properties,
such as crimp characteristics. In particular, the invention provides polyamide conjugate
filaments having requisite high-load crimp and boiling water ahrinkage characteristics
for stretch garment applications and, especially, for ladies' leg hose. The invention
also provides a process for producing such polyamide filaments.
[0006] According to one aspect of the invention, the process comprises stretching a fresh
filament at a stretch ratio greater than 1.0 and less than that which would cause
the filament to break, said filament being melt spun at a spinning speed of at least
1829 mpm (meters per minute) and comprising a first longitudinal polymeric segment
and a second longitudinal polymeric segment arranged in an eccentric configuration
along the length of the filament and differing from each other in dimensional change
characteristics, said difference and said stretch ratio being selected to provide
a filament having a low-load crimp test value of at least 12% and, preferably, at
least 20%. By "fresh" filament is meant a filament which has not been allowed to age
under conditions such that when stretched no substantial improvement is obtained as
compared to characteristics obtained when a filament spun under the same conditions
is aged for four (4) hours at 70% relative humidity and at a temperature of 25°C prior
to stretching to the same stretch ratio. Fresh filament characteristics can, in some
instances, be preserved at least temporarily by collecting and maintaining the filament
under anhydrous conditions until it is drawn as shown, for example, in Example 12
herein. Although applicants do not wish to be limited by theory, the use of a fresh
filament is believed to provide desirable results due to crystalline characteristics
at the time of stretching.
[0007] Preferably, the process is a spin-stretch process wherein the stretching of the filament
is accomplished in-line during melt spinning after the filament is formed and before
it is collected.
[0008] According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the spin-stretch process comprises
co-extruding two molten fiber-forming polymers having different terminal velocity
distances to form a molten stream in which the polymers are arranged in an eccentric
configuration along the length thereof, cooling and solidifying said molten stream
in a quenching zone to form a filament (solidified molten stream), attenuating and
accelerating said molten stream by withdrawing-the filament from the quenching zone
at a speed (i.e, spinning speed) of at least 1829 mpm and then stretching the filament
at a stretch ratio greater than 1.0 in-line before it is collected and, preferably,
as soon as possible after the molten stream has solidified, the pro- ceasing conditions
and polymers being selected to provide a filament having a low-load crimp test value
of at least 12% and preferably 20%. Preferably, at least one of the polymers is a
polyamide and most preferably is nylon 66. As used herein, the term "solidified" means
the molten stream has cooled sufficiently so that it no longer sticks (i.e. fuses)
to other filaments or to yarn guide surfaces. Polymers having "different terminal
ve- locity distancea" are characterized in that under the particular spin-stretch
conditions employed to form the molten stream the polymers solidify at different distances
from their point of extrusion (i.e., at different distances from the spinneret). The
measurement of terminal velocity distances is hereinafter described.
[0009] According to the most preferred embodiment of the spin-stretch process, both polymers
are polyamides and the processing conditions and polyamides are selected to provide
a conjugate filament having a high-load crimp test value of at least 12% and a boiling
water shrinkage test value such that the quotient obtained by dividing said crimp
test value by said boiling water shrinkage test value is at least 1.0. This quotient
is referred to herein as the "CRIMP/BWS ratio". In general, the highest high-load
crimp test values and lowest boiling water shrinkage test values are attained by selecting
highly crystalline hoaopolyanises, such as nylon 66 and to a lesser extent nylon o.
prererably, both homopolyamides are of the same chemical structure, that is, consist
of recurring structural units of the same cheni- cal formula. Most preferably each
polyamide is a nylon 66.
[0010] The conjugate filaments prepared in accordance with the present invention have little
or no torque (i. e., are substantially torque-free) and, therefore, offer certain
advantages over false-twist textured filaments which contain substantial torque (i.e.
are torque-lively). One advantage is that conjugate filaments may be used in the form
of a mid-denier singles yarn (e.g. 140 denier/34 filament yarn), whereas friction
false-twisted filaments cannot normally be used in this form because of torque, but
rather are used in the form of a plied yarn where two 70 denier singles yarns of opposite
torque are plied to form a 140 denier yarn of balanced torque.
[0011] The high-load crimp test (hereinafter defined) is used herein to determine the suitability
of conjugate filaments for hosiery and other stretch garment applications. The higher
the high-load crimp test value the more suitable the filament is for stretch garment
applications. For hosiery, the test value should be at least 12% and, preferably,
at least 15%. Although in practice the hose are normally placed in a dye bath maintained
at or near the ambient temperature and then the temperature of the bath is subsequently
raised to the boil to simultaneously develop the crimp and dye the hose, the high-
load crimp test is much quicker and easier to use than crimp tests conducted in boiling
water. The high-load crimp test correlates very well to boiling water crimp tests
for filaments prepared from two homopolyamides of the same chemical structure but
of different terminal velocity distances. Filament yarns of the present invention
have been knitted into ladies' hose and have developed excellent crimp characteristics
and exhibited acceptable boiling water shrinkage characteristics when the hose were
placed without restraint in a dye bath.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
[0012]
Figure 1 is a schematic representation of equipment useful in practicing the spin-stretch
process of the present invention; and
Figure 2 is a representation of the cross-section of 'a conjugate filament prepared
by the spin- stretch process of the invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS OF THE
IHVENTION
[0013] The process of the present invention provides conjugate filaments having improved
properties. For example, the process of the invention can be utilized to - provide
polyamide conjugate filaments which are particularly useful for ladies' leg hose applications.
While the process of this invention may be used to prepare a conjugate filament composed
of three or more fiber-forming polymeric segments, the two-segment filament is preferred
since it offers economic advantages over other multi-segment filaments; as the number
of segments increases, the process becomes more and more complicated and less and
less practical. Accordingly, the invention is described herein with reference to the
two-segment conjugate filament.
[0014] As used herein the term "conjugate filament" means a filanent comprising a first
longitudinal polymeric segment and a second longitudinal polymeric segment arranged
in an eccentric configuration along the length of the filament and differing from
each other in longitudinal dimensional change characteristics. The term "eccentric"
as used herein includes both side-by-side and asymmetrical sheath-core structures.
By differing in "longitudinal dimensional change character- iatica" is meant that
when the filament is structurally relaxed, for example, by exposure to boiling water
while under no tension, one of the segments shrinks or otherwise changes in length
to a different extent than the other segment(s), as evidenced by the filament assuming
a helical configuration or if the segments separate, by a difference in their individual
lengths. The formation of helical crimp or filament splitting in the foregoing teat,
of course, confirms the presence of at least two eccentrically arranged segments as
well as their differing dimensional change characteristics. Conjugate filaments having
segments differing from each other in longitudinal dimensional change characteristics
can be produced by methods well known in the art, such as, by using polymers having
different relative viscosities (e.g. see U.S. Patent 3,536,802). There may be a distinct
line of demarcation between the segments at their interface or, in some instances,
merely a gradient change in composition of the filament across its cross-section.
[0015] In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the process is carried out using the
equipment arrangement shown in Figure 1. Referring to Figure 1, polyamides A and B
of different terminal velocity distances are co-extruded at about the same melt temperature
at a given speed (extrusion speed) in molten form through circular capillaries 2 and
3, respectively, of spinneret 1. The molten polymers converge below the spinneret
face to form molten stream 4 in which polyamides A and B are arranged, as segments,
in a- side-by-side configuration. For-purposes of illustration the formation of only
one filament is shown in Fig. 1. It will be understood, however, in actual practice
of the invention the spinneret will normally have provisions for forming a plurality
of molten streams; that is, the spinneret will have a plurality of capillary pairs
2 and 3. Molten stream 4 is then quenched by conventional means to form a filament
(i.e., solidified molten stream). The filament is then passed into contact with finish
applicator means 5 which applies a liquid finish to the filament. Where there is a
plurality of filaments, the filaments are conveniently converged on applicator means
5. The filament is then passed around feed roll 6 with a partial wrap, around stretch
roll 7 with a partial wrap, heated by heating means 8 (e.g., a heated tube through
which the filament passes) and finally collected by collecting means 9 (e.g., a bobbin
on which the filament is wound). Roll 6 is rotated at a peripheral speed of at least
1829 mpm. Roll 7 is rotated at a peripheral speed greater than that of roll 6 but
usually no greater than twice that of roll 6. The partial wraps. are of an angle sufficient
to prevent slippage of the filament on the rolls. When the filament is collected on
a bobbin, it should be collected at a speed less than the peripheral speed of roll
7, thereby permitting the filament to relax (retract) before it is collected; otherwise,
difficulty is encountered in removing the bobbin from the chuck on which it is rotated,
particularly, where the filament or yarn makes a large number of wraps on the bobbin
to form the package. In instances where the filament makes only a small number of
wraps on the bobbin, heating of the filament by means 8 may be omitted. The filament
collected on the bobbin normally has both original crimp (visible crimp) which manifests
itself when the spinning tension is released and latent crimp which can be developed
by subsequent treatment of the yarn.
[0016] Figure 2 shows the cross-section of a typical conjugate filament prepared in accordance
with the process of the invention wherein the ratio of segment A to segment B used
in forming the filament is 1:1.
[0017] In accordance with the preferred embodiment of the invention, the spin-stretch process
is carried out under processing conditions and using polyamides so as to provide a
filament having a high-load crimp test value of at least 15% and a CRIKP/BWS ratio
value of at least 2 and most preferably values of at least 20% and 3, respectively.
The following discussion considers the effect of changing the indicated processing
variable while leaving all other variables constant.
[0018] One segment of the conjugate filament is preferably formed from a rapidly crystallizable
fiber-forming polyamide and the other from a less rapidly crystallizable fiber-forming
polyamide. This difference in crystallizability may be achieved by selecting polyamides
having different terminal velocity distances. In general as the difference between
their terminal velocity distances increases, the high-load crimp test value increases
to or approaches a maximum value and thereafter remains substantially the same. In
general, polymers become less crystallizable as the ratio of homopolymeric segments
to copolymeric segments increases, for example, the crystallizability of nylon 66>
nylon 66-6 (95:5)> nylon 66-6 (90:10)> nylon 66-6 (85:15). Therefore, highly crystalline
homopolyamides such as nylon 66 and nylon 6 are preferred, with nylon 66 giving the
highest high- load.crimp test values and, therefore, being the preferred polyamide
for use in practicing the invention. Nylon copolymers are designated herein in a conventional
manner, for example, "nylon 66-6" means the copolymer consisting of randomly occurring
66 units, -NH(CH
2)
6NHCO(CH
2)
4CO-, and 6 units, -NH(CH
2)
5CO-, formed, for example, by copolymerizing hexamethylene diammonium adipate and caprolactam.
Mole ratios when given are given in parenthesis following the copolymer designation,
for example, (95:5) means a mole ratio of 95:5, respectively.
[0019] When the polyamide used to form one of the segments of the conjugate filament is
composed of structural repeating units of.. the same chemical formula as the polyamide
used to form the other segment, selection of polyamides differing from each other
in relative viscosity values will provide the desired result in this process. When
nylon 66 polyamides of different relative viscosities (RV) are used to form the segments,
the difference in RV between the two nylon 66's should be at least 5, preferably at
least 15 and most preferably at least 30 with the RV of the high RV nylon 66 being
at least 30 and, preferably, at least 50 and most preferably at least 65.
[0020] While nylon 66 is the preferred polyamide, other polyamides may be used in practicing
the invention. Examples of other suitable hoaopolyamides include nylon 6 and nylon
610. Examples of suitable copoly amides include, but are not limited to, those described
in U.S. 3,399,108, 3,418,199, 3,558,760 and 5,667,207. Examples of such copolyamides
are: nylon 6-66, nylon 66-610; nylon 66-610-611-612; nylon 66-612; nylon 66-61 (6I=-NH(CH
2)
6

. units); nylon 66-6T (6T=-NH(CH
2),

units) nylon 66-6-612; nylon 6-66-610 and nylon 6-612.
[0021] The spinneret may be designed so that in forming a molten stream each of the molten
polymers may be extruded through a separate capillary in such a manner that the molten
polymers converge at the spinneret face to form the molten stream or the polymers
may be combined and then extruded through a common spinneret capillary to form the
molten stream. However, it is preferred that each of the molten polymers be extruded
through a separate capillary and converge below the spinneret face to form the molten
stream as shown in Fig. 1. Unless the molten polymers converge at or below the face
of the spinneret, the one segment (e.g. the low RV segment) tends to wrap around the
other segment (e.g. high RV segment), which in turn tends to reduce the ultimate crimp
of the filament.
[0022] The filament may be of any desired cross-section, e.g., circular, trilobal, etc.
However, it is more economical to manufacture spinnerets having circular capillaries.
Filaments having a cross-section resulting from the use of capillaries which are circular
in cross-section are shown in Fig. 2.
[0023] The volume ratio of the polyamide segments can vary over a wide range. As a practical
matter, the segment system normally will be within the range of 3:1 to 1:3. In the
case where both segments are nylon 66, a ratio of 1:1 to 1:3 (high to low relative
viscosity) is preferred with the greatest amount of crimp being obtained with a ratio
of about 30:70 (high to low relative viscosity).
[0024] Cooling of the molten streams normally occurs in a quench chamber, commonly referred
to as a chimney. The term "quench" as used herein means the cooling of the molten
streams sufficiently to provide solidified streams (i.e., filaments). Although cooling
of the streams may be assisted by a transverse (or concurrent) stream of flowing air,
such a stream is not required in order to provide filaments having high levels of
high- load crimp.
[0025] In conventional processes, the filaments are passed from the quenching chamber through
what is called a "steam conditioning" tube. Steam is circulated through the tube and
comes into intimate contact with the filaments. The purpose of the steam is to facilitate
subsequent processing of the filament. It has been found, however, that the use of
conditioning steam with the spin-stretch process of this invention significantly reduces
high-load crimp, i.e., to a level substantially below 10%. Accordingly, conditioning
steam should not be used with the process when high-load crimp is desired or, if it
is used, it should be used very sparingly.
[0026] Finish (aqueous or anhydrous) may be applied to the filaments by conventional means,
for example, by passing the filaments over a roll which transfers finish on to the
filaments from a .reservoir in which the roll is partially submerged and rotating.
Alternatively, a stationary V-shaped guide may be used. The guide is arranged so that
filaments ride in the V and a finish is metered to the filaments via a small tube.
A finish is not necessary in order to obtain the desired filament properties. However,
if a finish is not used, the filaments become statically charged and difficult to
handle, for example, when unwinding them from a bobbin. As a practical matter, the
finish is preferably an aqueous finish (water per se or a water base finish) in view
of the environmental considerations involved in the use of non-aqueous finishes.
[0027] The filaments are conveniently converged on the finish applicator means (e.g. the
above mentioned finish guide). If desired, the filament may be converged by means
of a conventional convergence guide after being quenched and prior to a finish being
applied thereto.
[0028] The molten streams are attenuated and accelerated from the spinneret (or, when formed
below the spinneret, from their point of formation) by a feed roll which withdraws
the quenched streams (filaments) from the quenching zone at a spinning speed greater
than the extrusion speed. The extrusion speed is the linear speed at which the molten
polyamide is theoretically traveling through the spinneret capillary or capillaries
and is calculated from the dimensions of the capillary, the extrusion rate and the
density of the polyamide. When more than one capillary is used to form the filament,
the linear speeds are averaged and the average speed is used as the extrusion speed.
The term "jet attenuation" (JA) as used herein represents the quotient obtained by
dividing the spinning speed (SS) by the extrusion speed (ES). It has been found that
increasing jet attenuation has little effect on the high-load crimp. In general, in
order to obtain filaments having a high level of high- load crimp, the spinning speed
must be at least 1829mpm. Preferably, spinning speeds of at least 2286 mpm and most
preferably at least 2743 mpm are used in practicing the process of the invention.
In general, increasing the spinning speed and other processing speeds accordingly
improves the economics of the process.
[0029] In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the filaments
are stretched in-line before being collected, for example, before being wound onto
a bobbin. Normally, if the filaments are collected and then subsequently stretched
in a separate operation, the filaments will not possess a significant level of high-load
crimp even though they may possess a moderate level of low-load crimp. It has been
discovered however, that if the filaments are spun and collected under anhydrous conditions
and kept under anhydrous conditions for a limited period of time until subsequently
stretched, it is possible to obtain filaments having a high-load crimp level in excess
of 8% even though the stretching of the filaments is accomplished in an operation
subsequent to and separate from the spinning operation. However, such conditions are
usually not practical from the standpoint of commercial operations.
[0030] The stretching is preferably accomplished using a roll arrangement as shown in Figure
1 wherein roll 6 is a feed roll and roll 7 is a stretch roll. The stretch roll is
operated at a peripheral speed higher than the peripheral speed of the feed roll.
With the roll arrangement shown in Figure 1 the filaments are stretched as they leave
feed roll 6. In general, as the stretch ratio is increased from 1, the level of highload
crimp imparted to the filaments increases through a maximum level and thereafter decreases
slightly. Normally, maximum high-load crimp test values are attained when the filaments
are stretched at a ratio greater than 1.0. In many instances use of a stretch ratio
greater than 2.0 can not be used without breaking filaments. It is contemplated that,
if desired, the stretching of the filaments may occur downstream of the feed roll;
for example, between two pairs of rolls where the first pair is rotating at the same
peripheral speed as that of the feed roll and the second pair at a higher peripheral
speed. Preferably, the filaments are stretched as soon as possible after being quenched,
As a practical matter, at spinning speeds of at least 1829 mpm the stretching will
occur within a fraction of a second after quenching. However, as mentioned above,
the stretching can be delayed for long periods of time (i.e., minutes, even hours),
providing the filaments are kept under anhydrous conditions. Under such conditions
an anhydrous finish or no finish at all must be used. Accordingly, where the filaments
are lagged for a substantial period of time (in excess of 4 seconds) before being
stretched, such as in a stuffer box type tower or by means of a roller around which
the filaments make a plurality of passes, an anhydrous finish is preferably used to
be certain the level of high-load crimp is not significantly reduced. Where the period
of time between quenching and stretching is significantly greater than about 4 seconds,
the filaments may also need to be kept in an anhydrous environment. Whether or not
an anhydrous finish and/or anhydrous environment provide satisfactory results can
easily be determined experimentally. Where the filaments are stretched within a few
seconds after quench the use of an aqueous finish and ambient conditions has very
little, if any, effect on the high-load crimp level obtained by the process.
[0031] In commercial practice of the process, it will normally be desirable to wind .the
filaments onto a bobbin by means of a winder with the winder being operated at the
lowest speed that can be used and still provide sufficient tension on the yarn to
obtain an acceptable package on the bobbin. Normally, a yarn tension between 0.05
and 0.1 grams per denier is used. Generally, the difference between the peripheral
speed of the stretch roll and the winder is in the range of 2 to 12%. This difference
in speeds causes the yarn to relax between the stretch roll and winder. Conventional
winders are available and may be used in practicing the process, which permit yarn
tensions to be preset, whereby the speed of the winder automatically adjusts to maintain
the preset tension. In certain instances it may be desirable to heat the yarn as it
is relaxing, depending on factors such as total yarn denier, package size, processing
speeds and the like. The heating of the yarn may be accomplished by exposing the yarn
to radiant heat or by passing the filaments through a tube heated with air. It is
also contemplated that the yarn may be heated by maintaining the stretch roll at a
suitable temperature to heat the filaments. The yarn, of course, should not be heated
in a manner or to a temperature that would significantly reduce its crimp. In this
regard it has been found that the use of steam to heat the yarn tends to significantly
reduce the high-load crimp level. Therefore, the use of steam to effect the heat relaxation
of the filaments is not recommended where high levels of high-load crimp are desired.
Measurements
[0032]
A. Relative viscosity (RV) values, when given herein, are given without units. First,
the intrinsic viscosity [n] of the polymer is determined and then the relative viscosity
(RV) is calculated from the equation: [n]=(0.184)(RV)0.941: solving for RV: RV- e raised to the following power:

The intrinsic viscosity is determined from the equation:

where t0 is the flow time at 25°C through a viscometer of 90% formic acid (pure solvent) and
t is the flow time through the same viscometer of a solution of the polymer having
the concentration (c) in grams of polymer/100 ml of pure solvent. In determing the
[n] of the high RV polymer a concentration of 0.25 grams/100 ml is used; in determining
the [n] of the low RV polymer a concentration of 0.50 grams/100 ml is used.
B. High-load crimp test values, when given herein, are given in terms of percent (%)
and are determined on a sample of filament(s) prior to development of its latent criap,
as follows:
(1) Determine the denier of the sample
(2) Calculate the number of revolutions on a denier reel that would be required to
make a skein (a continuous bundle of filaments in the form of a collapsed coil) having
a denier of 4000. No. of

(3) Prepare a skein having a denier of 4000 from the sample.
(4) Vertically hang the skein from a stationary hook by placing the skein over the
hook being careful to avoid stretching or tangling of the skein. Hook a low weight
wire hook (reshaped paper clip) through the bottom of the skein.
(5) With the skein hanging vertically from the hook, suspend a 800g weight from the
wire hook (the skein now has the appearance of a single 8000 denier strand).
(6) After the weight has been suspended for 0.5 minutes, remove the 800g weight and
replace it with a 20g weight.
(7) Suspend the skein with the 20g weight in a 120°C forced draft oven for 5 minutes.
(8) Remove the skein from the oven, let it cool for one minute and hang it once again
over the stationary hook with the 20g weight suspended from the skein via the wire
hook.
(9) then without removing the 20g weight, determine the length of the doubled skein
to the nearest 0.1 cm. Record this length (L1).
(10) Remove the 20g weight and replace it with an 800g weight; after 30 seconds determine
the length of the skein to the nearest 0.1 cm. Record this length (L2. % High-load

C. Low-load crimp test values, when given herein, are given in terms of percent (%)
and are determined from a sample of filament(s) before development of its latent crimp,
as follows:
(1) Determine the denier of the sample
(2) Calculate the number of revolutions on a denier reel that would be required to
make a skein (a continuous bundle of filaments in the form of a collapsed coil) having
a denier of 5412. No. of

(3) Prepare a skein having a denier of 5412 from the sample.
(4) Vertically hang the skein from a stationary hook by placing the skein over the
hook being careful to avoid stretching or tangling of the skein. Hook a low weight
wire hook (reshaped paper clip) through the bottom of the skein.
(5) With the skein hanging vertically from the stationary hook, suspend a 1000g weight
from the wire hook (the skein now has the appearance of a single 10824 denier strand),
and after 0.5 minutes measure the length of the doubled skein to the nearest 0.10m
and record this length as L1. Remove the 1000g weight.
(6) Suspend the skein in a 120°C forced draft oven for 5 minutes.
(7) Remove the skein from the oven, let it cool for one minute, attached a lOg weight
to the skein via the wire hook and hang it once again over the stationary hook with
the lOg weight suspended from the wire hook.
(8) Then, without removing the lOg weight, determine the length of the doubled skein
to the nearest O.lcm. Record this length as L2.
(9) Remove the lOg weight and replace it with the 1000g weight; after 30 seconds determine
the length of the skein to the nearest 0.1 cm. Record this length as L3. % Low-Load Crimp=L3-L2 x 100 L1
D. Boiling water shrinkage values, when given herein, are given in terms of percent
(%) and are determined:
(1) Determine the denier of the sample.
(2) Calculate the number of revolutions on a denier reel that would be required to
make a skein having a denier of 2250.

(3) Prepare a skein having a denier of 2250.
(4) Vertically hang the skein from a stationary hook by placing the skein over the
hook being careful to avoid stretching or tangling of the skein. Hook a low weight
hook (reshaped paper clip) through the bottom of the skein.
(5) With the skein hanging vertically from the stationary hook, suspend a 1500g weight
from the wire hook (the skein now has the appearance of a 4500 denier strand).
(6) After the weight has been suspended for 10 seconds, determine the length of the
doubled skein to the nearest 0.1 cm and record this length as Li (initial length).
(7) Replace the 1500g weight with a 6.lg weight and immerse the skein in a boiling
water bath for 1 minute.
(8) Remove the skein from the bath, then remove the 6.1g weight and permit the skein
to air dry. After the skein is dry, condition at-standard atmospheric conditions (72%
RH) for 12 hours.
(9) Again suspend the 1500g weight from the skein while the skein is hanging vertically
from the stationary hook.
(10) After 10 seconds, determine the length of the doubled skein to the nearest 0.1
cm and record this length as Lf (final length). % boiling water shrinkage (BWS) =

x 100
E. Terminal Velocity Distance: According to one aspect of the invention, the process
is carried out by co-extruding through a spinneret two polymers (e.g., Polymer A and
Polymer B) having different Terminal Velocity Distances, Polymer A and Polymer B being
joined to form a molten stream that is solidified in a quenching zone to form a filament
and being attenuated and accelerated by withdrawing the filament from the quenching
zone at a speed (spinning speed) of at least 1829 mpm. The velocity of a molten stream
continually increases up to the point at which it solidifies at which point its velocity
corresponds to the spinning speed. The Terminal Velocity Distance of Polymer A is
determind under the same conditions used when co-extruding Polymer A and B except
in this instance only Polymer A is extruded. A Laser Doppler Velocimeter using a He-Ne
laser with optics for 9 mm beam separation and 250 mm focal length and using a counter
type signal processor Model 1980 built by TSI, Inc., St. Paul, Minnesota (or equivalent
instrument) is used to determine the. point at which the molten stream consisting
entirely of Polymer A attains its maximum or terminal velocity. The distance from
the spinneret to this point is measured and recorded as the Terminal Velocity Distance
of Polymer A. The Terminal Velocity Distance of Polymer B is then determined in the
same manner. The actual Terminal Velocity Distance values are not important so long
as the values are different.
[0033] The following examples are given to further illustrate the invention. In the following
examples yarns are made using the same general apparatus and procedure described in
Example 1. The specific conditions utilized are given in each example along with test
results obtained.
EXAMPLE 1
[0034] This example illustrates the preparation of conjugate filaments of the present invention
in which a high relative viscosity nylon 66 is used to form one of the segments and
a lower relative viscosity nylon 66 is used to form the other segment.
[0035] A high relative viscosity nylon 66 (RV-82) and a lower melt viscosity nylon 66 (RV-41)
having different terminal velocity distances are co-extruded in a side-by-side configuration
in a 1:1 ratio using the apparatus arrangement shown in Fig. 1, except that instead
of one pair of capillaries the spinneret has seven (7) pairs of circularly spaced
holes (capillaries) each having a diameter of 20 mils (0.51mm). The extrusion temperature
is 285
0C and the extrusion rate is 0.011896 cc/sec/capil- lary. A convergence guide (metered
finish pin) is located 91.44 cm from the face of the spinneret. The finish pin is
rectangular in shape with its long axis being parallel to the threadline. The pin
is grooved to receive and converge the seven filaments. Aqueous finish is metered
to the groove and into contact with the converged filaments. The filaments are quenched
enroute to the finish pin by means of a cross-flow (2.83 cmm) of ambient air. The
filaments in the form of a yarn are withdrawn from the finish pin at 2858 mpm (i.e.spinning
speed) by means of a driven roll (feed roll) around which the yarn makes a partial
wrap. The feed roll is 19 cm in diameter and located 6.1 m from the face of the spinneret.
The yarn is withdrawn from the feed roll at 4572 mpm by means of a stretch roll around
which the yarn also makes a partial wrap. The stretch roll is also 19 cm in diameter.
The distance between the centers of the two rolls is 63 cm. The feed roll and stretch
roll are arranged to prevent slippage of the yarn on the rolls. The yarn is withdrawn
from the stretch roll and wound onto a bobbin by means of a conventional winder at
a yarn tension of 1.0g. Enroute to the bobbin from the stretch roll the yarn passes
between, but not in contact with, two strip heaters (30.48 cm by 10.16 cm) placed
0 6.35 mm apart face-to-face and heated to about 275 C. The yarn relaxes between the
stretch roll and bobbin an amount equal to the quotient obtained by dividing the difference
between the peripheral speed of the stretch roll (S
1) and the winding speed (5
2) by (Si), i.e.:

In this instance the hot relaxation is 0.098 or 9.8%.
[0036] A second bobbin of yarn is prepared and collected under identical conditions, except
in this instance the heaters are eliminated from the process. The processing conditions
used in making the two bobbins of yarn are summarized below:

[0037] In-line relaxation, Hot/Cold Given in Table 1 The effect of eliminating hot relaxation
is shown in Table 1.

[0038] The results given in Table 1 show that the use of heat in relaxation has a slight
adverse effect on crimp and strength properties and a slight beneficial effect on
BWS. The use of heat in relaxation can be avoided except to the extent larger packages
are required.
EXAMPLE 2
[0039] This example shows that in the absence of an in-line stretch, yarns of high-load
crimp are not obtainable even at high spinning speeds. Yarns are prepared as described
in Example 1 using the following conditions:

Test results are given in Table 2.
[0040]

EXAMPLE 3
[0041] This example shows that substantial changes in the jet attenuation (JA) factor has
little effect on high-load crimp and tenacity. Yarns are prepared as described in
Example 1 using the following conditions:

Test results are given in Table 3.
[0042]

[0043] The results given in Table 3 show that increasing the JA by a factor of four gives
only a slight increase in high-load crimp.
EXAMPLE 4
[0044] This example shows the effect on crimp and tenacity of varying feed roll speeds (spinning
speeds) from 1486 to 4572 mpm, stretch roll speeds from 2743 to 5486 mpm and in-line
stretch ratios from 1.1 to 1.85. The highest high-load crimp values are obtained at
spinning speeds (feed roll speeds) of 2743 mpm and higher and in-line stretch ratios
of 1.2 or higher.
[0045] In a first series of runs, yarns are prepared as described in Example 1 using the
following conditions:

Test results are given in Table 4A.
[0046]

[0047] In a second series of rune, yarns are prepared as described in Example 1 using the
following conditions:

Test results are given in Table 4B.
[0048]

[0049] In a third series of runs yarns are prepared as in Series 4B except the melt ratio
is different and the RV difference between the polymers is much higher. The following
conditions are used:

Test results are given in Table 4C.
[0050]

[0051] In a fourth series of runs yarns are prepared as in series 4C using the following
conditions:

Test results are given in Table 4D.
[0052]

[0053] In a fifth series of runs, yarns are prepared as in series 4D except the melt ratio
is different. The following conditions are used:

Test results are given in Table 4E.
[0054]

[0055] In a sixth series of runs, yarns are prepared as in series 4D except a stretch roll
speed of 5486 mpm is used. The conditions used are:

Teat results are given in Table 4F.
[0056]

EXAMPLE 5
[0057] This example shows the effect of varying the Δ RY in the 24 to 34 range. Yarns are
prepared as in Example 1 using the following conditions:

Test results are given in Table 5.
[0058]

[0059] The results in Table 5 show that in general increasing the ΔRV increases high-load
crimp.
EXAMPLE 6
[0060] In this example yarns are prepared as in Example 5. In this instance the RV of the
high RV polyamide is varied while the RV of the Low RV polyamide is held constant.
The conditions used are:

Test results are given in Table 6.
[0061]

[0062] As in Example 5, the results show that high-load crimp increases with increases in
ΔRV.
EXAMPLE 7
[0063] This example shows the effect of varying the melt ratio on high-load crimp and low-load
crimp. The yarns are prepared as in Example 6 using the following conditions:

Test results are givn in Table 7.
[0064]

[0065] The results show that changing the melt ratio has a significant effect on high-load
crimp and relatively little effect on low-load crimp.
EXAMPLE 8
[0066] This example illustrates the effects of steam conditioning the yarn on crimp. Yarns
are prepared as in Example 1 except that the filaments are passed through a tube (steam
conditioning tube) having a diameter of 12.7 cm and a length of 182.9 cm. The tube
is placed 132 cm from the face of the spinneret. Steam is introduced into the tube
through ports located near the filament inlet end of the tube. The following conditions
are used:

Test results are given in Table 8.
[0067]

[0068] The negative effects of steam conditioning on high-load crimp is dramatically shown
in Table 8.
EXAMPLE 9
[0069] This example illustrates the use of spinnerets constructed in such a way that the
polymer streams converge at a point other than below the spinneret face.
[0070] In one series of runs, two yarns of different denier (9AA and 9AB) are prepared as
in Example 1 except in this instance a spinneret is used in which the two angled capillaries
(polymer streams) join at the spinneret face rather than below the spinneret face
as shown in Fig. 1. The following conditions are used:

Test results are given in Table 9A.
[0071]

[0072] In another series of runs, two yarns (9BA and 9BB) are prepared as above except that
in this instance each filament is formed by combining the polymer streams above the
spinneret face and then extruding the combined streams through a common capillary
of the spinneret. Also, the nylon 66's have a RV of 28 instead of 14. The following
conditions are used:

Test results are given in Table 9B.
[0073]

[0074] , The results given in Tables 9A and 9B show that spinneret constructions other than
those where the polymers converge below the spinneret may effectively be used in practicing
the present invention.
[0075] A comparison of the crimp values in Table 9B with those in Table 9A shows that in
this instance increasing the Δ RV results in an increase in crimp values.
EXAMPLE 10
[0076] This example illustrates the preparation of yarns in accordance with the invention
wherein the high viscosity and/or low viscosity polyamide is a polyamide other than
nylon 66.
[0077] In one series of runs, yarns are made from nylon 610 and nylon 66 using the following
conditions:

Test results are given in Table 10A.
[0078]

[0079] The results in Table 10A show that acceptable crimp values are obtained using nylon
610 in combination with nylon 66 (Item 10AA). The results also show the importance
of the ΔRY. Note that in run 10AB the ΔRV is not of a sufficient magnitude to obtain
a significant high-load value.
[0080] In another series of runs, yarns are made from nylon 66 and nylon 6 using the following
conditions:

Test results are given in Table 10B.
[0081]

[0082] In anbther series of runs, yarns are made from nylon 6 using the following conditions:

Test results are given in Table 10C.
Test results are given in Table 10D.
[0084]

[0085] In another series of runs, yarns are prepared under the same conditions employed
in Series 10D except in this instance the copolymer is the high RV polymer and the
homopolymer is the low RV polymer. The following conditions are used:

Test results are given in Table 10E.
[0086]

[0087] The results shown in Table 10E show the adverse effects on BWS values when the copolyamide
is used as the high RV component.
[0088] In another series of runs, yarns are prepared under the same conditions employed
in Series 10E except in this instance the polyamides are:
nylon types (Hi/Lo) 6-66(15:85)/66
nylon RV's (Hi/Lo) Given in.Table 10F
Test results are given in Table 10F.
[0089]

EXAMPLE 11
[0090] In this example various as-spun conjugate yarns were prepared at low spinning speeds
using the equipment described in Example 1 and conditions given in Table 11A. The
as-spun yarns are lagged at ambient conditions and then subsequently stretched in
a separate operation between stretch rolls under conditions given in Table 11B. Test
results are also given in Table 11B.

[0091] The results in Table 11B show that when the yarn is spun at low speeds and then stretched
in a subsequent operation, the yarn does not have significant high-load crimp.
EXAMPLE 12
[0092] This example demonstrates the effect on high-load crimp of using an aqueous finish
(Aq) versus an anhydrous finish (Anhy) in instances where the stretching of the filaments
is an in-line stretch versus a post stretch in a separate operation.
[0093] A series of yarns are prepared as in Example 1 using the following conditions:

Test results are given in Table 12.
[0094]

[0095] The results in Table 12 show that considerable high-load crimp is lost if the yarn
is lagged before stretching. Compare items 12A and B to 12C and D and 12E and F to
12G through J. The results also show that moisture has an adverse effect on the power
crimp of lagged yarn (compare 12C to 12D) and worsens with time (compare 12D to 12H
to 12J).
[0096] In the foregoing examples the importance of selecting and correlating processing
conditions and of selecting polymers with respect to melt viscosities, melt viscosity
differences, polymer type, etc. on high- load crimp values is demonstrated.
1. A substantially torque-free filament comprising a first longitudinal polyamide
segment and a second longitudinal polyamide segment arranged in an eccentric configuration
along the length of the filament and differing from each other in longitudinal dimensional
change characteristics, said filament having a high-load crimp test value of at least
12% and a boiling water shrinkage test value such that the quotient obtained by dividing
said crimp test value by said shrinkage test value is at least one.
2. The filament of claim 1 wherein the filament consists of two segments arranged
in a side-by-side configuration along the length of the filament.
3. The filament of claim 2 wherein the volume ratio of the segments is in the range
of 3:1 to 1:3.
4. The filament of claim 2 wherein said quotient is at least 2.
5. The filament of claim 4 wherein said crimp test value is at least 15%.
6. The filament of claim 2 wherein said quotient is at least 3.
7. The filament of claim 6 wherein said crimp test value is at least.18%.
8. The filament of claim 6 wherein said crimp test value is at least 20%.
"9. The filament of claim 2 wherein one of said segments consists essentially of a
homopolyamide and the other segment consists essentially of a copolymer.
10. The filament of claim 9 wherein said homopolyamide is nylon 66.
11. The filament of claim 9 wherein said homopolyamide is nylon 6.
12. The filament of claim 2 wherein each segment consists essentially of a homopolyamide.
13. The filament of claim 12 wherein one segment consists essentially of nylon 66
and the other segment consists essentially of nylon 6.
14. The filament of claim 12 wherein each segment consists essentially of nylon 6.
15. The filament of claim 12 wherein each segment consists essentially of nylon 66.
16. The filament of claim 15 wherein said quotient is at least 3.
17. The filament of claim 16 wherein said crimp test value is at least 18%.
18. A process characterized by stretching a fresh filament at a stretch ratio greater
than 1.0, 'said filament being melt spun at a spinning speed of at least 1829 mpm
and comprising a first longitudinal polymeric segment and a second longitudinal polymeric
segment arranged in an eccentric configuration along the length of the filament and
differing from each other in dimensional change characteristics, said difference in
change characteristics and said stretch ratio being selected to provide a filament
having a low-load crimp test value of at least 12%.
19. The process of claim 18 wherein said difference in dimensional change characteristics
and said stretch ratio are selected to provide a filament having a low-load crimp
test value of at least 20%.
20. The process of claim 19 wherein said stretching is accomplished in-line immediately
following melt spinning and before said filament is collected.
21. A spin-stretch process for preparing a conjugate filament said process comprising
co-extruding two molten fiber-forming polymers having different terminal velocity
distances to form a molten stream in which the polymers are arranged in an eccentric
configuration along the length thereof, cooling and solidifying said molten stream
in a quenching zone to form a filament, attenuating and accelerating said molten stream
by withdrawing the filament from the quenching zone at a speed of at least 1829 mpm
and then stretching the filament in-line at a stretch ratio of greater than 1.0 before
it is collected, the processing conditions and polymers being selected to provide
a filament having a low-load crimp test value of at least 12%.
22. The process of claim 21 wherein said processing conditions and polymers are selected
to provide a filament having a low-load crimp test value of at least 20%.
23. The process of claim 22 wherein the filament is stretched within 1 second after
the molten steam is solidified.
24. The process of claim 23 wherein said speed is at least 2288 mpm.
25. The process of claim 23 wherein at least one of the polymers is a polyamide.
26. The process of claim 23 wherein at least one of the polymers is nylon 66.
27. The process of claim 23 wherein said polymers are converged after extrusion.
28. The process of claim 23 wherein said filament consists of said segments arranged
in a side-by-side configuration.
29. The process of claim 28 wherein the volume ratio of said polymers is in the range
of 1:3 to 3:1.
30. A spin-stretch process for producing a conjugate filament, said process comprising
co-extruding two molten fiber-forming polyamides having different terminal velocity
distances to form a molten stream in which the polyamides are arranged in an eccentric
configuration along the length thereof, cooling and solidifying said molten stream
in a quenching zone to form a filament, attenuating and accelerating said molten stream
by withdrawing the filament from the quenching zone at a speed of at least 1829 mpm
and then stretching the filament in-line at a stretch ratio greater than 1.0 before
it is collected, the processing conditions and polyamides being selected to provide
a filament having a high-load crimp test value of at least 12% and a boiling water
shrinkage value such that the quotient obtained by dividing said crimp value by said
boiling water shrinkage test value is at least 1.0.
31. the process of claim 30 wherein said polyamides are arranged in a side-by-side
configuration along the length of the filament.
32. The process of claim 30 wherein said speed is a.t least 2286 mpm.
33. The process of claim 30 wherein said speed is at least 2743 mpm.
34. The process of claim 30 wherein the filament is stretched within 4 seconds after
said molten stream is solidified.
35. The process of claim 30 wherein the filament is stretched within 1 second after
said molten stream is solidified.
36. The process of claim 31 wherein the spinning conditions and polyamides are selected
to provide a filament having a said crimp test value of at least 15% and a said quotient
of at least 2.0.
37. The process of claim 31 wherein the spinning conditions and polyamides are selected
to provide a filament having a said crimp test value of at least 20% and a said quotient
of at least 3.0.
38. The process of claim 31 wherein said polyamides are extruded in a volume ratio
ranging from 3:1 to 1:3.
39. The process of claim 31 wherein each polyamide is a homopolyamide.
40. The process of claim 39 wherein one homopolyamide is nylon 66 and the other is
nylon 6.
41. The process of claim 39 wherein one homopolyamide is are nylon 6 and the other
homopolyamide is a nylon 6 of a different relative viscosity.
42. The process of claim 39 wherein one homopolyamide is nylon 66 and the other homopolyamide
is a nylon 66 of a different relative viscosity.
43. The process of claim 42 wherein said polyamides are extruded in a volume ratio
of 1:1 to 1:3, high relative viscosity polyamide to low relative viscosity nylon 66.
44. The process of claim 42 wherein the difference between the relative viscosities
of said nylons is at least 15.
45. The process of claim 42 wherein the difference between the relative viscosity
of said nylons is at least 30.
46. The process of claim 42 wherein one nylon 66 has a relative viscosity of at least
50 and the other nylon 66 has a relative viscosity of less than 50.
47. The process of claim 42 wherein one nylon 66 has a relative viscosity of at least
65 and the other nylon 66 has a relative viscosity of less than 65.
48. Filaments of claim 1 in the form of a yarn.
49. Filaments of claim 15 in the form of a yarn.