[0001] The present invention relates to a method and device for conditioning fabrics in
a tumble-dryer. The term "conditioning" is used herein to mean the imparting of certain
consumer benefits, including softness and reduced static cling, to washed fabrics.
[0002] GB 2 122 657A (Unilever), published on 18 January 1984, and GB 2 136 028A (Unilever),
published on 12 September 1984, both disclose a device for applying powdered fabric
conditioning agent to fabrics in the tumble dryer. The device consists of an inner
container, such as a paper or nonwoven fabric sachet, filled with fabric conditioner
and positioned within a second, apertured container which is substantially form-retaining
and of a shape, for example spherical, that allows ready movement among the tumbled
fabrics. The inner container is permeable to the powdered fabric conditioner and the
powder is dispensed through the two containers as the device moves freely among the
fabrics. This device gives exceptionally uniform delivery of conditioner onto the
fabrics.
[0003] The preferred form of inner container is a sachet of tea bag paper or the like which
is provided with a large number of small openings, distributed over its whole area.
[0004] The outer container serves to protect the inner container from direct contact with
damp fabrics and with water droplets, so that clogging of the relatively small pores
of the inner container is prevented. The outer container also helps to reduce the
incidence of local overloading of conditioner, and hence spotting and staining. Because
of its shape and form-retaining properties it is unlikely to become caught in the
fabrics.
[0005] An alternative type of inner container is also described, which is a sachet of plastics
film having a relatively small number of relatively large openings positioned relatively
closely together in one wall only.
[0006] An example of such a sachet, having six holes each of 2 mm diameter, is illustrated
in Figures 7 and 8 of both applications.
[0007] It has now surprisingly been found that this type of inner container may be used
alone, without an outer container, to deliver a powdered fabric conditioning agent
in the tumble-dryer. Delivery of powdered fabric conditioner from this type of sachet
has been found to be substantially more efficient than from the tea bag type, and
clogging does not appear to occur to any significant extent.
[0008] The present invention accordingly provides a process for conditioning fabrics, which
comprises tumbling damp fabrics under the action of heat in a laundry dryer in direct
contact with a sachet containing a fabric conditioning composition in free-flowing
powder form, the sachet being formed of a sheet material substantially impermeable
to moisture and to the fabric conditioning composition, and the sachet being provided
with a relatively small number of openings having smallest and largest dimensions
within the range of from 1.0 to 3.0 mm and being substantially free of other openings.
[0009] When delivering a powdered fabric conditioning composition in the tumble-dryer from
a dispensing device, it has been found highly desirable that virtually all the composition
be delivered within the first 10 minutes of the drying cycle, while the fabric load
is still damp enough for the particles of conditioning agents to adhere, take up moisture
and spread. Some conditioning compositions, however, tend to agglomerate under the
moist, warm conditions of the dryer and the resulting agglomerate particles may be
too large to escape from the dispensing device if its holes, for example the pores
of tea bag paper, are relatively small. The powder thus becomes trapped in the dispensing
device. Agglomeration can be aggravated by the presence of perfume. The role of dryer
conditions in the agglomeration process has been demonstrated by comparing the delivery
rates of fabric conditioning powders under normal conditions with the delivery rates
obtained when a dry load in an unheated dryer is used.
[0010] According to the present invention the adverse effect of dryer conditions on delivery
is alleviated by careful choice of the size and location of the holes in a dispensing
device in the form of a sachet. While the total open area in such a sachet may be
no greater or may even be smaller than that of a sachet of tea bag paper, the delivery
rate of the powdered conditioning composition can be substantially improved.
[0011] The openings have smallest and'largest dimensions within the range of from 1.0 to
3.0 mm, preferably from 1.5 to 2.5 mm. Conveniently the openings may be circular and
these figures then apply to their diameters. Optimum opening size depends on the particle
size of the powdered conditioning composition, which can range from 20 to 1000 µm,
preferably 50 to 500 µm and more preferably 80 to 300 µm. It is preferred that the
smallest dimension of the openings is at least 3 times as large as the upper particle
size limit of the powder, and it is desirably at least 7 times as large.
[0012] For powders classified as 90 to 180 µm and 90 to 250 µm, excellent delivery characteristics
have been found using circular holes of 2 mm diameter.
[0013] Since the openings are relatively large, only a small number of such openings is
needed to ensure efficient delivery. The number of holes per sachet is preferably
from 3 to 12, and more preferably from 6 to 10.
[0014] Conveniently the openings are positioned relatively closely together in one wall
only of the sachet. This means that the sachet is not unduly weakened by the presence
of these relatively large openings. Furthermore, the openings can easily be closed,
prior to use, by means of a relatively small covering patch or strip that can be peeled
off immediately before the sachet is inserted in the tumble-dryer. The covering patch
or strip need cover only the area occupied by openings and may be, for example, an
adhesive-coated paper label provided with non-adhesive-coated pull tabs.
[0015] A further advantage is obtained if the openings are positioned close to one end or
edge of the sachet. The sachet can then be held with this end or edge uppermost while
the cover strip is peeled off; the powder will then remain below the level of the
openings and will not come into contact with the user's hands.
[0016] Preferably the openings are all positioned within a single area of sachet wall not
exceeding 800 mm2 (8 cm
2) and more preferably not exceeding 500 mm2 (5 cm
2). This is in the context of an overall sachet wall area that preferably ranges from
18 to 200 cm
2; for a simple square sachet having two walls this corresponds to dimensions of 3
cm x 3 cm to 10 cm x 10 cm. The overall sachet wall area more preferably ranges from
25 to 100 cm
2.
[0017] Optimum sachet size of course depends on the weight of fabric conditioning composition
to be delivered. The appropriate dose will of course vary to some extent between different
compositions, but will generally be within the range of from 1.5 to 12 g, preferably
from 3 to 10 g and more preferably from 5 to 7 g. The sachet should be chosen to accommodate
the powder comfortably without undue wastage of sachet material. For a 3 to 10 g dose
a sachet of 5-7 cm x 5-7 cm has been found to be of suitable size.
[0018] The sachet is made of a material impermeable to the conditioning composition and
to water. A plastics sheet material, for example polyethylene, may conveniently be
used. Advantageously this may have a layer of paper or nonwoven fabric laminated to
its outer surface to form the outer wall of the sachet. This facilitates adhesion
of a patch or cover strip over the area where the openings are located, and if desired
can also carry printed matter or a design. A suitable laminate is manufactured by
Stora-Kopparberg of Sweden under the trade mark Storalene 739-45: this consists of
a polyethylene layer (17 g/m
2) and a nonwoven fabric layer (45 g/m
2). The nonwoven fabric sheet consists of 40% cellulose pulp, 35% cotton linters, 20%
viscose and 5% acrylic fibres.
[0019] The fabric conditioning compositions used in the process of the invention can include
any material which imparts to fabrics any consumer benefit, for example, softness,
anti-static properties, perfume, crease-resistance or easy-iron characteristics, or
any combination of these. It is essential that the composition be in free-flowing
powder form, in order that it can be delivered by a sachet in accordance with the
invention. It is furthermore essential for effective conditioning that the powder,
once scattered onto the damp fabrics, will during the drying cycle form a fluid or
gel phase and spread over the fabrics before drying. This gel formation may be by
way of melting, dissolution, dispersion or any combination of these mechanisms. It
thus follows that the composition desirably either melts at the temperatures prevailing
in the later part of the drying cycle, or has an affinity for water at these temperatures
such that efficient spreading will occur by means of normal or colloidal dissolution
or dispersion; or exhibits a combination of these properties.
[0020] In terms of melting point, there is an additional constraint that a material that
melts at too low a temperature will melt while still in the inner container and will
not be delivered. Thus it is generally true that powders melting below about 50°C
are not suitable for use in the process of the present invention.
[0021] If fabric conditioning agents having these various prerequisites are used, the composition
may consist wholly of such ingredients that contribute actively to fabric conditioning.
Other conditioning agents, for example, those not available as free-flowing powders,
having too high or too low melting points or too low solubilities, may nevertheless
be used in the device of the invention if they are combined with adjunct materials
that improve these properties.
[0022] The three benefits currently most sought after by the consumer are softening, elimination
of static cling and perfume. As indicated previously, the tumble-drying process itself
imparts some softness to the fabrics, but this is less than the softness resulting
from the use of a rinse conditioner; additional softening is thus desirable. Softening
agents known in the art include substantially water-insoluble surfactants, especially
nonionic and cationic surfactants.
[0023] According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the fabric conditioning composition
includes or consists of one or more water-soluble C
8-C
22 saturated or unsaturated soaps. Advantageously the composition consists to an extent
of at least 55% by weight of such soaps.
[0024] It is especially preferred that the composition consist to an extent of at least
55% by weight of a blend of soaps of C
a-C
22 saturated or unsaturated fatty acids, said soap blend containing at least 5% by weight
of C
l2 soap, at least 5% by weight of C
14 soap, at least 12% by weight of
C16 soap and at least 20% by weight of C
18 soap, the composition being in the form of a powder free of any protective coating.
[0025] A method of conditioning fabrics using such a composition is described and claimed
in the aforementioned GB 2 136 028A (Unilever).
[0026] It has been found that soap blends as defined above, when applied as a free-flowing
powder to fabrics in the tumble-dryer, are highly effective fabric softeners and also
reduce static cling; this latter property can if desired be further improved by the
inclusion of a minor proportion of cationic material, but that is by no means essential.
The particles, scattered from the sachet onto the fabrics during the early part of
the drying cycle, initially adhere to the damp fabric and then spread to cover the
fabrics.
[0027] These soap blends are especially suited to delivery in powder form. Soap applied
as a coating or impregnant on a sheet substrate, without distributing agent, was found
to be delivered very poorly to the fabrics, so that very little softening benefit
was obtained; a substantial proportion of the soap remained on the sheet substrate.
According to the method of the present invention, on the other hand, 100% delivery
of the conditioning agent to the fabrics may easily be achieved without the use of
a distributing agent.
[0028] The particle size of the powder will influence the speed and uniformity of delivery.
Particle sizes above 1000 pm have been found to give insufficiently uniform conditioning,
and thus powders having particle sizes above this figure, which may more properly
be regarded as granules, are unsuitable for use in the process of the invention. The
smaller the particle size of the powder, the greater the uniformity of its distribution
on the fabrics in the dryer; but a particle size smaller than 20 µm is undesirable
on safety grounds because of its respirability. As indicated above, the preferred
particle size range is 50 to 500 µm, more preferably 80 to 300 µm.
[0029] The powdered conditioning agent used according to the invention preferably consists,
to an extent of at least 65% by weight, of the soap blend as defined above. The cation
is generally alkali metal, preferably sodium or potassium; ammonium; or substituted
ammonium, for example, triethanolamine. The blend preferably contains at least 7%
by weight of C
12 soap, especially from 7 to 27%; at least 6% by weight of C
14 soap, especially from 6 to 12%; at least 15% by weight of C
16 soap, especially from 18 to 28%; and at least 25% by weight of C18 soap, especially
from 32 to 54% by weight.
[0030] The soap blend advantageously used in the process of the invention thus contains
significant amounts of four different chain lengths, the spread of chain lengths -
from
C12 to C
18 - being relatively wide.
[0031] The blend may contain both saturated and unsaturated soaps. Advantageously the blend
contains at least 15% by weight of C
18 unsaturated soap, preferably at least 20% by weight and especially from 22 to 38%
by weight.
[0032] These blends having a wide and well balanced chain length spread, obtainable for
example by mixing tallow and coconut soaps, have been found to give highly efficient
softening. These blends may advantageously contain from 45 to 85% by weight of tallow
soap, the balance being coconut soap.
[0033] Commercial blends of coconut and tallow soaps as used in toilet soap bars and fabric
washing soap flakes have been found to offer excellent softening performance. These
blends may in some cases be superfatted, that is to say, they contain up to about
10% by weight of free fatty acids. This appears not to be detrimental in terms of
softening performance, but can make the milling of the soap to a free-flowing powder
more difficult.
[0034] The chain length distribution of some typical blends, together with those of tallow
and coconut soaps, are shown in the Table.
[0035] The powdered conditioning agent may if desired consist entirely of soap. This has
the merits of cheapness, technical simplicity and environmental innocuousness.
[0036] Alternatively, blends of soap (55% by weight or more) with lesser amounts of other
materials may be used. Since soap already has excellent delivery and softening characteristics,
no additional materials such as distributing agents are required to improve those
properties, and since soaps are cheap and easy to handle, it will not generally be
necessary to include other materials on cost reduction or processing grounds. Any
additional materials used may thus be chosen purely to enhance the overall fabric
conditioning effect, for example, to improve the reduction of static cling or to impart
crispness, perfume or easy-iron characteristics. Of course these additional materials
must be available in free-flowing powdered form, whether as such or coated or encapsulated.
[0037] If desired the powdered fabric composition may contain soap in combination with a
cationic fabric conditioning agent to give especially effective reduction of static
cling. The cationic fabric conditioning agent, which may be present in an amount of
from 5 to 45% by weight, is advantageously a quaternary ammonium salt. Fabric-substantive
compounds of this general class containing two long-chain alkyl groups and two lower
alkyl groups, for example, di(hardened tallow alkyl) dimethyl ammonium chloride or
methosulphate, are especially suitable. One such material is Arosurf (Trade Mark)
TA 100 ex Ashland Chemical Company, which is a dry, free-flowing 95% active form of
distearyl dimethyl ammonium chloride.
[0038]

[0039] The fabric conditioning composition also advantageously contains a perfume, which
is preferably fabric-substantive. Other components of the composition need not be
fabric-substantive, unlike the materials used in rinse conditioners, because the fabrics
are not wetted again after the application of the conditioning composition.
[0040] A sachet for use in the process of the invention will now be described in further
detail, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which
Figure 1 is a plan view, of approximately actual size, of a sachet, and
Figure 2 is a sectional view, on an enlarged scale, of the sachet of Figure 1.
[0041] Referring now to Figures 1 and 2 of the drawings, a sachet 18, containing a powdered
fabric conditioning composition 4, is formed of a laminate of polyethylene film 19
and nonwoven fabric 20, the film 19 being innermost. The sachet 18 is approximately
square in shape and its dimensions are approximately 6 cm x 6 cm. As shown, the sachet
18 is composed on a single sheet of laiminate, one edge 21 being constituted by a
fold and the other edges 22 being closed by heat-sealing; alternatively, two sheets
could have been used and all four edges closed by heat-sealing. Six holes 23 of approximately
2 mm diameter have been punched in one wall of the sachet, the holes being positioned
within a notional rectangular area 25 of about 4 cm x 0.6 cm (2.4 cm
2) close to one edge 27 of the sachet. A label 24 of paper coated with adhesive covers
a slightly larger area than the area 25 and completely covers the holes 23; the label
24 adheres without difficulty to the nonwoven fabric 20, but can readily be removed
immediately prior to use of the sachet by peeling. Non-adhesive-coated regions 26
are provided at both ends of the label 24 to form pull tabs.
[0042] In the process of the invention, fabrics that have been washed, rinsed and spun are
placed in the tumble-dryer. The sachet is held with the edge 27 uppermost, as shown
in Figure 2, so that the powder 4 lies below the level of the holes 23, and the label
24 is pulled off. The sachet is then placed in the tumble-dryer with the damp fabric
load and the dryer is operated in the normal way. The powder is scattered over the
fabrics, mostly during the first 10 minutes of the dryer cycle; it adheres to the
still-damp fabrics, spreads and conditions the fabrics.
[0043] The invention is further illustrated by the following non-limiting Examples.
EXAMPLES
[0044] For the Examples, 6 cm x 6 cm sachets were prepared using the Storalene (Trade Mark)
laminate described above. The sachets were generally as described above with reference
to the accompanying drawings, but contained differing numbers of holes, ranging from
1 to 12, as detailed in the individual Examples. In every sachet the holes were confined
within a 6 mm-wide area just below the top seal. For comparison purposes, tea bag
sachets of the same size were prepared from Crompton (Trade Mark) 650 31AB tea bag
paper. This has an average pore size of about 75 µm. Some comparative information
on a tea bag sachet and a perforated laminate sachet with 10 2-mm circular holes is
given below.

[0045] The "percentage vented area" is the percentage of the total area of sachet wall constituted
by holes or pores.
[0046] For the tumble-drying tests, 2.5 kg mixed fabric loads (50% cotton, 50% synthetic
fabrics) were first washed at 60°C in a Miele (Trade Mark) 429 front-loading automatic
washing machine using Persil (Trade Mark) Automatic washing powder. The wash cycle
included rinsing and spinning. The load was then placed in a Creda Reversair (Trade
Mark) tumble-dryer, together with the sachet under test, and the dryer switched on.
The dryer was stopped after 5, 10 and 20 minutes, the sachet was removed, weighed
and replaced, and the dryer was restarted. The sachet was also weighed at the end
of the cycle. Thus the weight of active ingredient that had been delivered at each
stage could be determined by difference. Both high and low heat settings of the tumble-dryer
were used as specified in the individual Examples. Comparison runs were also carried
out using dry fabric loads and no heat, to determine the delivery characteristics
of the various sachet/powder combinations in the absence of moisture and heat.
EXAMPLE 1
[0047] In this Example, the sachets each contained 6 g of fabric conditioning composition,
consisting of 1.5 g Arosurf (Trade Mark) TA 100 (distearyl dimethyl ammonium chloride)
and 4.5 g of powdered soap (4 parts sodium tallow soap, 1 part sodium coconut soap),
plus 1.1% by weight of perfume. The powder was prepared by mixing the ingredients
in slurry form, drying and milling to a particle size range of 90-180 µm.
[0048] The delivery of this powder from perforated laminate sachets with 10 holes was compared
with the delivery from tea bag sachets, both under normal dryer conditions (using
the high heat setting) and using a dry load and no heat. The results are shown in
Table 1. The delivery of conditioner from a commercially available impregnated tissue
- Bounce (Trade Mark) ex Procter & Gamble - was also tested; the tissue carried about
2.1 g of fabric conditioner as a waxy solid coating.
[0049] It will be noted that under normal dryer conditions only about 2 g of the 6 g of
powder was delivered by the tea bag sachet over the whole 60-minute cycle, the remaining
4 g being trapped in the sachet owing to agglomeration. The perforated sachet used
according to the invention, on the other hand, delivered 5.9 g altogether, of which
5.7 g were delivered in the first 10 minutes of the drying cycle.
[0050] Under the "ideal" conditions of a dry load and no heat, both sachets delivered their
contents rapidly and efficiently, showing that the problems encountered with the tea
bag sachet may be attributed to the damp, warm conditions prevailing in a real tumble-dryer
situation.
[0051] The impregnated tissue delivered a much smaller quantity of active ingredient, amounting
to only about 77% of its loading, and did so relatively slowly.
EXAMPLE 2
[0052] The procedure of Example 1 was repeated using as active ingredient 6 g of Arosurf
TA 100 alone, sieved to a particle size of 90-180 µm. The results are shown in Table
2.
[0053] This material showed very much less tendency to agglomerate, and delivery from the
tea bag sachet under real conditions was almost satisfactory. The perforated sachet
still, however, gave faster delivery and showed less sensitivity to dryer conditions.

EXAMPLE 3
[0054] The effect of the number of dispensing holes in the sachet was investigated using
6 g of active ingredient consisting of 1.5 g Arosurf TA 100 sieved to 90-250 µm and
dry-mixed with 4.5 g soap (as in Example 1) milled to 90-250 µm, together with 1.1%
perfume. Sachets with 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 holes were compared with each other, with
tea bag sachets and with Bounce (Trade Mark) impregnated tissues, at both low and
high heat settings, the results being shown in Tables 4 and 5 respectively. The tea
bag sachet was also tested under "ideal" conditions (dry load, no heat) to indicate
the extent of the influence of heat and moisture on its delivery characteristics.
[0055] At the low heat setting (Table 4), 1 hole was clearly inadequate and 3 holes were
not very satisfactory. The sachets with 6 holes and 9 holes performed well and only
a small improvement was obtained on going to 12 holes. The tea bag sachet performed
very poorly under these conditions.
[0056] At the high heat setting (Table 5), similar results were obtained, with slightly
greater differentials between the 3-hole, 6-hole and 12-hole sachets. The tea bag
sachet was even worse under these conditions.

[0057] Impregnated tissues were tested at the same time and the following results were obtained:

[0058] In both sets of conditions delivery was very slow. At the low heat setting, the total
delivery of 1.37 g of active ingredient was less than that delivered by the teabag
sachet (2.22 g) and represented about 65% of loading; at the high heat setting a higher
percentage (about 77%) of active ingredient was delivered, the amount being similar
to that delivered by the tea bag sachet.
1. A process for conditioning fabrics, which comprises tumbling damp fabrics under
the action of heat in a laundry dryer together with a dispenser containing a fabric
conditioning composition in free-flowing powder form, characterised in that the dispenser
is in the form of a sachet (18) which comes into direct contact with the fabrics in
the dryer, the sachet (18) being formed of a sheet material (19, 20) substantially
impermeable to moisture and to the fabric conditioning composition (4), and the sachet
(18) being provided with a relatively small number of openings (23) having smallest
and largest dimensions within the range of from 1.0 to 3.0 mm and being substantially
free of other openings.
2. A process as claimed in claim 1, characterised in that the openings (23) have smallest
and largest dimensions within the range of from 1.5 to 2.5 mm.
3. A process as claimed in claim 1 or claim 2, characterised in that the number of
openings (23) in the sachet is within the range of from 3 to 12.
4. A process as claimed in claim 3, characterised in that the number of openings (23)
is within the range of from 6 to 10.
5. A process as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 4, characterised in that the openings
(23) are all positioned within a single area (25) of sachet wall not exceeding 800
mm2.
6. A process as claimed in claim 5, characterised in that the openings (23) are all
positioned within a single area (25) of sachet wall not exceeding 500 mm2.
7. A process as claimed in claim 6 or claim 7, characterised in that the area (25)
occupied by the openings (23) is relatively close to one edge (27) of the sachet.
8. A process as claimed in any one of claims 5 to 7, characterised in that the area
(25) occupied by the openings (23) is covered by an adhesive cover patch (24) removable
by peeling.
9. A process as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 8, characterised in that the openings
(23) are substantially circular.
10. A process as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 9, characterised in that the sachet
(18) is formed of plastics sheet material (19) having paper or nonwoven fabric (20)
laminated to its outer surface.
11. A process as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 10, characterised in that the sachet
(18) has a total outer surface area within the range of from 18 to 200 cm2.
12. A process as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 11, characterised in that the sachet
(18) has a total outer surface area within the range of from 25 to 100 cm2.
13. A process as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 12, characterised in that the weight
of fabric conditioning composition (4) in the sachet (18) is within the range of from
1.5 to 12 g.
14. A process as claimed in claim 13, characterised in that the weight of fabric conditioning
composition (4) in the sachet (18) is within the range of from 3 to 10 g.
15. A process as claimed in claim 14, characterised in that the weight of fabric conditioning
composition (4) in the sachet (18) is within the range of from 5 to 7 g.
16. A process as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 15, characterised in that the fabric
conditioning composition (4) has a particle size within the range of from 20 to 1000
µm.
17. A process as claimed in claim 16, characterised in that the fabric conditioning
composition (4) has a particle size within the range of from 50 to 500 µm.
18. A process as claimed in claim 17,"characterised in that the fabric conditioning
composition (4) has a particle size within the range of from 80 to 300 µm.
19. A process as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 18, characterised in that the smallest
dimension of the openings (23) is at least 3 times as great as the upper particle
size limit of the fabric conditioning composition (4).
20. A process as claimed in claim 19, characterised in that the smallest dimension
of the openings (23) is at least 7 times as great as the upper particle size limit
of the fabric conditioning composition (4).
21. A process as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 20, characterised in that the fabric
conditioning composition (4) comprises one or more water-soluble soaps of C8 - C22 saturated or unsaturated fatty acids.
22. A process as claimed in claim 21, characterised in that the fabric conditioning
composition (4) consists to an extent of at least 55% by weight of a blend of soaps
of C8-C22 saturated or unsaturated fatty acids, said soap blend containing at least 5% by weight
of C12 soap, at least 5% by weight of C14 soap, at least 12% by weight of C16 soap and at least 20% by weight of C18 soap, the composition being in the form of a powder free of any protective coating.
23. A process as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 22, characterised in that the fabric
conditioning composition (4) comprises from 5 to 45% by weight of a cationic fabric
conditioning agent.