(19) |
 |
|
(11) |
EP 0 148 140 A2 |
(12) |
EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION |
(43) |
Date of publication: |
|
10.07.1985 Bulletin 1985/28 |
(22) |
Date of filing: 04.12.1984 |
|
|
(84) |
Designated Contracting States: |
|
AT BE DE FR GB IT NL SE |
(30) |
Priority: |
19.12.1983 SE 8307006
|
(71) |
Applicant: Flygt AB |
|
S-171 25 Solna (SE) |
|
(72) |
Inventor: |
|
- Fries, Hjalmar
S-163 58 Spanga (SE)
|
(74) |
Representative: Larsson, Sten |
|
Flygt AB
Box 1309 171 25 Solna 171 25 Solna (SE) |
|
|
|
(54) |
Impeller for aeration of water tanks |
(57) The invention concerns an impeller for mixing purposes. The impeller has a leading edge angle which decreases from the hub and towards the
tip, the tip vortexes then diminish and a more congruent division of the vortexes
over the entire impeller blade is obtained.
|

|
[0001] When aeration of a liquid and simultanous mixing with an impeller, it has shown out
that the two activities influence on each other.
[0002] It is ofter a wish to keep the size of the air- or gas bubbles to avoid coalescense.
Creation of vortexes at the impeller may, if it is extensive and cnncentrated, increase
the coalescense as the bubbles go towards the rotation centre of the whirls as there
the density of the liquid decreases. On the other hand, the bubbles may have a negative
effect on the impeller if-they concentrate on its suction side and create a discontinuance,
thus obtaining that the flow gets.so unfavourable that the impeller looses its suction
ability. Even here a coalescense takes place on the suction side and this is the same
phenomenon as at the free vortex. The air or the gas concentrate at areas having a
low static pressure.
[0003] These phenomena bring about that areas where air is brought in must be separated
from aeras where the impellers are situated and this could mean that bigger tanks
or more expensive constructions must be used. The invention solves these problems..
[0004] The purpose of the invention is thus to give the impeller such a shape that its tip
vortexes are suppressed and replaced by a vortex pattern which gradually leaves the
impeller from the hub and outwards. The low pressure zone on the upper side of the
impeller which normally is subject to concentration of air, is also given such a shape
that impeller sections of different radii cooperate as little as possible.
[0005] The invention also has an impeding influence on the suction of air from the water
surface. Air that is sucked in at the blade tip when it passes near the surface can
not move inwards along the blade surface depending on the plane design of the impeller.
This means that the impeller may be mounted near the surface and nevertheless obtain
a controlled operation.
[0006] The results obtained are especially important at waste water plants, where the water
and the sludge must be aerated and moved simultanously to avoid sedimentation. The
line of the lifting force for the impeller is given a backward swept extension and
at the same time the blade surface is divided, preferably in the form of elliptical
functions, so that the angle of the leading edge of the blade succesively decreases
relative the circumference from the hub towards the blade tip.
[0007] Fig 1 shows a conventional plane impeller and its typical tip vortex.
[0008] Fig 2 shows a backward swept impeller blade according to the invention and how its
vortex pattern leaves the blade from the centre and outwards to the tip. The vortex
vr the vortex pattern is a result of an overflow from the underside of the blade to
its upper side and depending on the relative movements of the chord elements caused
by the backward sweeping, the overflow will not be concentrated to the tips.
[0009] In order to obtain the ability of self cleaning, mixer impellers have already been
manufactured having a backward swept leading edge. These impellers have however not
shown to give the above described effects as the trailing edge has not accompanied
in the backward sweeping. A contineus underpressure area having a radial extension
has therefore occurred on the suction side.
[0010] An elliptical area division which is swept backwards so that the angle between the
leading edge and the circumference decreases towards the tip, gives automatically
the above described geometry of the trailing edge. Small variations from the elliptical
area division may be made, without any major deterioration of the wishe< results.
This may be dictated from a physical point of wiew or other constructive wishes. Typical
is however, that a relatively small part of the blade area is divided towards the
tips and that the sesulting traction centre of the blades thus lies at around 70%
of the radius. This is a known proportion in the aviation field, but has never been
utilized in a self cleaning impeller for mixing.
[0011] A further possibility to counteract air intake at the suction side of the blade is
to gradually transfer the profiles of the impeller axially, so that the tips will
be situated downstream the hub. In this way even the blade area may be corrected to
essentially be a tangent to a straight cylindrical impeller shaft and thus obtain
a simple design.
! An impeller for mixing purposes, characterized in that the angle of the leading
edge with the circumferance decreases from the hub and towards the tip and that the
impeller blades area has an essentially elliptical division.
2 An impeller according to claim 1, characterized in that also the trailing edge describes
a back-ward going curve with reference to the rotation direction of the impeller.
3 An impeller according to claims 1 and 2, characterized in that the profiles of the
impeller is axially displaced, so that an impeller blade shaft directed backwards
in the rotation direction essentially is a tangent to the blade surface.
4 An impeller according to claims 1 and 2, characterized in that the profiles of the
impeller blades are axially displaced downstream, succesively from the hub towards
the tips.