Field of the invention
[0001] This invention relates to the provision of solder or other materials onto a printed
wiring board or like device and the removal of excess solder therefrom.
Background of the invention
[0002] As described in U.S. Patent 4,315,042 issued to Donald J. Spigarelli on February
9, 1982, incorporated herein by reference and assigned to the assignee hereof, there
have been several techniques of "solder levelling" which have been developed for obtaining
uniformly thick coatings of solder, on the order of 0.0003 to 0.0006 inches, on parts
such as printed wiring boards. As noted in this patent, centrifugal forces have been
utilized to remove excess solder. A second technique is to use hot oil jets with the
hot oil being projected onto the surfaces of the part which has been immersed in molten
solder to remove the excess solder in a controlled fashion. Hot air has also been
utilized to blow off excess solder. As noted in this patent there are various problems
with the above-mentioned techniques, whereas the above-mentioned patent describes
a simplified method and apparatus for solder levelling. In the Spigarelli patent the
method of solder levelling described involves the maintenance of a zone of hot saturated
inert vapor at the temperature of molten solder above a molten bath of solder. A part
to be treated is then moved through the vapor at a rate such that it will become uniformly
heated to temperatures approaching that of molten solder prior to immersion therein.
After initial heating the part is immersed in the molten solder and is withdrawn from
the molten solder through the saturated vapor to the ambient atmosphere. While withdrawing
the part, streams of hot high density fluid are projected onto the surfaces of the
part in directions opposite to the direction of withdrawal to sweep the surfaces of
the excess solder. In this patent the part is vertically lowered through the not saturated
inert vapor into a solder pot and is then removed vertically. While this technique
works adequately in a large variety of situation, solder sag can occur due to the
vertical orientation of the board as it is withdrawn from the solder pot. While solder
sag may not inherently present problems in the electrical operation of the board,
solder sag is oftentimes unsightly.
[0003] Moreover, the solder removal technique in the aforementioned patent describes movement
of the board in a vertical direction which, for production line purposes, requires
right angle changes in direction of the board for presolder and postsolder processing.
This change in direction of the flow of the product requires complicated mechanical
repositioning apparatus and is thus somewhat undesirable for high volume production
lines.
[0004] Additionally, the Spigarelli patent describes fluid jets angled 15°-40° with respect
to the board surface to give a glancing flow for solder removal. While these angles
work satisfactorily in most instances, clearing of "thru-holes" or "via holes" in
the board is an occasional problem. Moreover, while this patent specifies pressures
of 5-40 Ibs. per square inch, the energy delivered by the liquid stream depends on
the nozzle dimensions and flow rate. While acceptable levelling occurs at the above
pressures, a maximally efficient system requires analysis of the energy delivered
to the board. Finally, for vertical board transport, the solder films on either side
of the board are equal in thickness which makes differential thickness control difficult.
Summary of the invention
[0005] While the subject technique utilizes the basic concept of the above-mentioned Spigarelli
patent in that dual phases of a heat transfer fluid, liquid and vapor, are utilized
to effectuate both process heating and solder levelling, it has been found that nozzle
angle and energy delivered by the nozzle flow to the board are critical to efficient
solder removal. It has also been found that a near horizontal board transport into
and out of the vapor chamber presents the possibility of not only producing a system
more compatible with in-line processing but also one in which solder sag is minimized
and one in which hole clearing is readily accomplished.
[0006] More specifically, it has been found that by maintaining the flow from one of the
nozzles near normal to the board while maintaining the other of the nozzles at a slight
angle to the board, hole clearing is rapidly and repeatably accomplished.Additionally,
it has been found that effective solder removal requires that the energy deliverd
to the board be above a newly empirically found threshold. It has been found that
jet streams delivering energy below this threshold do not provide adequate hole clearing.
This threshold is dependent upon nozzle flow, that is to say, pounds of fluid delivered
to the board surface per second per lineal inch of nozzle aperature for a given liquid
density and temperature and a given hole aspect ratio, with the threshold being determined
empirically by inspection of the percent of holes cleared. It is thus the operation
of the solder levelling nozzles above a predetermined energy threshold which permits
hole clearance in a maximally efficient manner. From experimental evidence, this threshold
is fairly sharply defined such that solder removal efficiency for hole clearing increases
to a level exceeding 99% from a plateau region where 80 to 95% clearing is the rule.
This level of clearance (exceeding 99%, usually 100%) is essential to the commercial
viability of solder levelling. Inspection, criteria and later manufacturing pro-
cesses require 100% hole clearance on all boards.
[0007] It will be appreciated that in the near-horizontal transport of a board the vapor
level in the chamber must be precisely set. More particularly it will be appreciated
that a completely horizontal system would be impossible without complicated vapor
seals. The subject system provides vapor sealing through the utilization of a cooled
chamber throat which is angled upwardly and extends above the level of the vapor maintained
in the chamber. The more horizontal that the transport system can be made, the less
will be the solder sag. Additionally the horizontal transport system provides the
opportunity for more precise hole clearing with, in a preferred embodiment, the upper
nozzle providing a jet stream at or near normal to the board and the lower nozzle
providing an angled stream which lower stream is angled against board withdrawal.
[0008] As to the advantages of the near-horizontal transport system, these advantages are
achieved by providing a vapor-filled chamber with an angled throat into which the
board to be coated is introduced. The throat contains a transport system and a carrier
for the board which transports the board between the throat and a specially designed
recirculating solder pot which has a throat in-line with the plane of the transport
system. The solder pot, in one embodiment, is of a recirculating design with a sloping
passage for its throat, in which as the board enters, solder spills over a weir into
a lower reservoir from whence it is pumped through a centrifugal pump back up into
a standpipe which charges the sloping passage. Solder is added to the pot, in one
embodiment, through a drop tube, the lower end of which is immersed in the solder
in the lowest portion of the reservoir. This provides a unique vapor seal so that
the solder pot may be recharged during operation. The drop tube also provides means
for determining the level of the solder in the pot.
[0009] In one embodiment the throat for the chamber is water cooled to provide for vapor
containment. This water cooled throat forms one of three cooling zones which respectively
provide for vapor containment, vapor levelling, and vapor condensation.
[0010] Solder levelling is accomplished with nozzles positioned in the vapor filled chamber
to either side of the board transport system between the solder pot and throat of
the chamber. The nozzled project streams of hot liquid maintained above the solder
melting temperature towards opposing sides of the board. The perpendicular distance
from the board to the nozzle, i.e. nozzle offset, is adjustable, as is nozzle angle.
Nozzle angle is adjustable by rotation of a sector to which each nozzle is secured.
In one embodiment the pivot point for each sector is such that the impact angle of
the stream on the board is adjusted about an axis passing through this pivot point.
The sector is provided with a series of teeth or slots at its curved outer periphery
to lock the nozzle to a predetermined position by virtue of the cooperation of one
of the slots with a spring loaded detent bar. This makes the slot angle adjustable
to the extent of the angle subtended by the sector. Further adjustment is achieved
through a variation in the attachment mechanism of the nozzle to the sector. In one
embodiment this attachment is accomplished by a bar which extends from the pivot point
of the nozzle to a point at the periphery of the sector which carries the teeth of
slots mentioned above. This bar may be secured either at one side of the sector or
at the other so that the initial angle of the nozzle with respect to the sector may
be varied between at least two positions prior to fine adjustment accomplished by
the rotation of the sector itself.
[0011] In a further embodiment a spring loaded carrier is utilized for the transport of
printed wiring boards, with the spring action providing ready loading and unloading
of the unfinished and finished boards. In one embodiment the spring loaded carrier
comprises a three sides frame, with the fourth side being completed by a transversed
member slidable within the opposing sides of the frame. The board is inserted into
the frame which has lips to retain the board. The slidable member is then urged towards
its opposing side by a U-shaped leaf spring which presses the sliding member against
the top board edge.
Brief description of the drawings
[0012] These and other features of the subject invention will be better understood in connection
with the detailed description taken in conjunction with the drawings of which :
Figure 1 is an isometric view of apparatus for solder coating an article, illustrating
the slanted near-horizontal throat for the vapor chamber therein;
Figure 2 is a diagrammatic and sectional view of the apparatus of Figure 1 showing
a near-horizontal transport system, the vapor chamber, recirculating solder pot, adjustable
nozzles for solder removal, and throat cooling means for maintaining the vapor within
the chamber and throat therefor;
Figures 3A-3D are schematic illustrations of the near-horizontal transport of the
board through the system of Figure 2, illustrating board insertion and travel into
and out of the solder pot utilized in the apparatus of Figure 2;
Figure 4 is a diagrammatic view of the near-horizontal transport system of Figure
2 illustrating a spring loaded frame carrier for a circuit board to be coated, also
illustrating the chain drive transport and the opposition of the solder pot throat
to the throat for the chamber;
Figure 5 is a side view of a sector- mounted nozzle forming the upper nozzle of Figure
2;
Figure 6 is a front view of a portion of the nozzle and sector of Figure 5;
Figure 7 is a side view of the lower nozzle for use in the apparatus of Figure 2 showing
a sector-carried nozzle;
Figure 8 is a front view of a portion of the nozzle and sector of Figure 7;
Figure 8 is a side and diagrammatic view of the combined mounting of the nozzles and
sectors of Figures 5 and 7;
Figure 10 is a front view of a portion of the nozzles and sectors of Figure 9;
Figure 11 is an isometric view of the solder pot for use in the system of Figure 2;
and
Figure 12 is a sectional and schematic view of the solder pot of Figure 11, illustrating
the recirculation of the solder within the solder pot.
Detailed description
[0013] Referring now to Figure 1, a vapor phase soldering unit is illustrated as having
a cabinet 12 and a console 14 with various controls 16 and a display or monitor 18.
Cabinet 12 is provided with a forward projection 20 having a loading slot or aperature
22 into which a printed wiring board is inserted prior to solder coating and out of
which the solder-levelled board is extractedafter the solder coating and levelling
process is performed within the unit.
[0014] Referring now to Figure 2, unit 10 is diagrammatically described in which a near-horizontal
transport system 24 is shown to include a chain drive 26 to which is secured a frame
28 which carries the printed wiring board and moves in the direction of double ended
arrow 30 so as to move the board from loading slot 22 into and out of a recirculating
solder pot 30 which has a throat 32 aligned with the direction of the transport system.
Throat 32 is spaced from a throat 34 which runs from a vapor chamber 36 to loading
slot 22.
[0015] Throat 34 has a liquid cooled jacket 38 disposed about it to which coolant is supplied
from a coolant supply 40. In one embodiment the coolant is water. The purpose of the
water-filled jacket is to prevent vapor generally illustrated at 42 from exiting chamber
36 via throat 34.
[0016] Vapor 42 is maintained at the level indicated by dotted line 46 by condensation or
cooling coils 48 and 50, the top coil of which establishes the level of hot high-density
saturated inert vapor within chamber 36. Vapor is generated from material 52, normally
Fluorinert FC-70, which is heated by coils 54 at the bottom of chamber 36 to a temperature
above the melting point of solder. Vapor which reaches the level of cooling coils
48 and 50 is condensed and returned respectively to the bottom of chamber 36 or to
the bottom of a subdivided chamber 56 which is provided with heating coils 58 at the
bottom thereof. These coils heat the condensed vapor to a temperature of 390°F to
415°F in one embodiment. A pump 60 is provided to pump the condensed vapor in liquid
form via line 62 to nozzle 64 and 66 mounted astride the path of the near-horizontal
transport system with the nozzles angled in accordance with the orientation of the
sectors 65 and 68 to which they are attached. The temperature of the liquid is maintained
above the melting point of the solder. Sectors 65 and 68 are adjustable in the direction
indicated by double ended arrow 70 on an assembly generally indicated at 72 which
includes a frame 73 and carriages 74 and 76 translatable on the frame, with the carriages
carrying the respective sectors. The translation of the carriages on the frame serves
to vary the distance between the pivot points of the nozzles and the plane of the
near-horizontal transport system.
[0017] It is a finding of this invention that the greatest efficiency in the removal of
solder from holes in the printed wiring board is achieved when the top nozzle is angled
at or near perpendicular to the plane of the printed wiring board and thus substantially
perpendicular to the near-horizontal transport system plane, whereas the bottom nozzle
is slightly angled towards the solder
pot as indicated as much as 25° from the perpendicular to the face of the printed wiring
board. Alternatively, the bottom nozzle is angled at or near perpendicular to the
plane of the board, with the top nozzle angled towards the solder pot.
[0018] As illustrated, solder pot 30 is a recirculating type solder pot which by virtue
of pump 80 and impeller 82 pumps solder generally indicated at 85 up into a standpipe
88 whence it flows out through throat 32 and over the edge of the throat down into
a receptacle or reservoir 86, with the leading edge of the throat serving as a weir.
Solder is added to solder pot 30 via a feed or drop tube 87. The level of solder in
pot 30 can be monitored by monitoring the height of solder in feed tube 87 which extends
down to the lowest portion of the reservoir. The removal of solder in coating the
product will cause the level in reservoir 86 to drop. Note that the immersion of the
feed tube into the molten solder creates a vapor seal.
[0019] In operation, after the positioning of a printed wiring board in frame 28 a drive
unit 90 under control of a control unit 92 is utilized to drive a sprocket 94 of chain
drive 27, with a sprocket 96 acting as an idler sprocket for the chain drive. As such
the two chains and respective sprockets constitute parallel drive members.
[0020] The operation is diagrammatically illustrated in Figures 3A-3D in which in Figure
3A a board 100 is mounted to frame 28. As illustrated in Figure 3B, the board at position
100' travels down throat 34 and traverses the space between throat 34 and throat 32
until such time as the board 100 is immersed in solder in throat 32. As illustrated
at 100", the board is positioned in the solder pot 30 in throat 32 for a predetermined
dwell time, usually on the order of 2-5 seconds, and is then withdrawn as illustrated
at 100"` via the actuation of the near-horizontal transport system.
[0021] The near-horizontal transport system described is set forth in more detail in Figure
4 in which like apparatus of Figures 2 and 4 carry like reference characters. Here
it can be seen that throat 34 includes a flat bottom portion 110 which supports frame
28 as it moves downwardly. Throat 34 also includes channels 112 and 114 on either
side of bottom portion 110 to accommodate chain drive 26. As illustrated, the leading
edge 116 of frame 28 rests on the flat bottom portion which supports not only the
frame but the printed wiring board, here illustrated at 120 which is carried within
the frame. The back of the frame is joined at points 122 and 124 to chain 26, with
frame 28 being provided with a movable transverse member 126 which is urged in a downward
direction by leaf spring 128 which is joined at one end 130 to side member 132 of
frame 28. The other end 134 is demountably secured to frame side member 136 at the
end thereof to permit removal of the transverse member 126 for insertion of a printed
wiring board into the frame. In general, the side and bottom members of the frame
contain grooves for the holding of board 120 so that board 120 is secured therein.
[0022] In operation, frame 28 and board 120 are cantilevered over the leading edge 140 of
bottom portion 110 between nozzles 64 and 66, which as can be seen are elongated transverse
to the direction of the near-horizontal transport system. The space between leading
edge 140 and edge 142 of throat 32 is made less than the length of the frame. The
plane of bottom portion 144 of throat 32 is the same as the plane occupied by bottom
portion 110 of throat 34, although this need not be the case, with throat 32 straddling
this plane. It will be appreciated that the frame 28 could in alternative embodiments
be'guided by slides or rollers in transiting between edge 140 and edge 142.
[0023] Referring now to Figure 5 and 6, top nozzle 66 is shown rotatable about an axis passing
through point 150 which is on sector 68, with sector 68 being provided with notches,
slots or teeth 152 at its periphery. Sector 68 is pivoted at point 154 on a carriage
generally indicated at 156 as illustrated by dotted line 158. This carriage corresponds
to carriage 74 of Figure 2. Carriage 156 is mounted for translation of the frame portion
of assembly 72 of Figure 2 to provide for a predetermined nozzle offset from the path
of the printed wiring board. Nozzle 66 is oriented on sector 68 via positioning bar
160 which is attached at one end to the periphery of sector 68 at either of two points
162 or 162' depending on the initial angle desired for nozzle 66. The other end of
the bar is secured to the end of the corresponding nozzle and pivots on the sector
about pivot point 150 such that the nozzle pivots relative to the sector with the
pivoting of the bar. Carriage 156 carries a detent member 170 which cooperates with
slots or teeth 152 to releasably lock sector 68 into a predetermined position. Referring
to Figure 6 the pivot points 150 and 154 while shown offset may be made to coincide
for easy adjustment of nozzle 66. Referring to Figures 7 and 8 the bottom nozzle 64
is positioned in the same manner as top nozzle 66 in that it is pivoted about a point
150' on sector 65, with a bar 160' determining the initial angle of this nozzle vis-a-vis
sector 65. Detent 170' communicates with slots 152' in the same manner as described
in connection with Figures 5 and 6. Here carriage 156' corresponds to carriage 76
of Figure 2. Referring to Figures 9 and 10, nozzles 64 and 66 are mounted in spaced
adjacency by virtue of the coaction of portions 180 and 182 of their respective carriages
156 and 156'. This spacing can be preadjusted by the movement of butting portion 180
along extension 184 of carriage 156', with the angular orientation of the nozzles
being adjusted as described above.
[0024] It has been found, as mentioned above, that the clearing of solder from the holes
in the printed wiring boards is accomplished more readily when one of the two nozzles
projects a stream at or near normal to the board, whereas the other nozzle projects
a stream slightly off this normal in a direction opposite to the removal direction
of the board. In one embodiment, the spacing between the nozzle tip and the board
for each of the nozzles is on the order of 1/4-1/2 inches whereas the angle of the
non-normal nozzle is on the order of 25° with respect to the normal to the board.
[0025] The opportunity to place the nozzle- projecting a stream at or near normal to the
board above or below the plane of the board provides an ability to regulate the thickness
of solder deposit placed on the surfaces. Solder thickness tends to be heavier on
the lower surface of the board where surface tension and gravity counter each other.
On the top surface, surface tension and gravity work together to reduce the thickness
of deposit. Thus, it is a feature of the near-horizontal transport system that the
solder thickness on the bottom side of the board is greater than the thickness on
the top side of the board and that this thickness can in part be controlled by the
angle of the nozzles involved. For instance, for a top nozzle perpendicular to the
board and a bottom nozzle at 25° with respect to the normal, almost all of the solder
is removed from the top board surface whereas the thickness of the solder on the bottom
board surface is on the order of .0004 inches. It can therefore be seen that there
is a differential in thickness of the solder initially deposited on the board and
that this thickness can be even further controlled by adjustment of the nozzles. On
the other hand, with the bottom nozzle normal to the board and the top nozzle at 25°
the thicknesses on top and bottom can be made more nearly the same.
[0026] It has also been found that until the energy of the jet stream delivered by the nozzles
exceeds a predetermined level, solder levelling is uneven and sometimes without effect.
For a given set of conditions, this maximally efficient levelling occurs above a predetermined
flow rate measured in terms of pounds of material delivered to the board surface per
second per lineal inch of nozzle aperature. For a nozzle of 7 inches in length and
an inert fluid of specific gravity 1.6 at 410°F such as Fluorinert FC-70, the flow
rate is adjusted to be above a threshold of 0.2228 lb./sec-in, computed as follows
:
QTOT=27in3/sec, for a 7 inch nozzle (experimental data)
Qin 27 in3/sec-7 in = 3.857 in3/sec-in 0.36 1b/in3 H20 density x 1.6 sp. gr.
FC-70 x 3.857 in 3/sec-in = 0.2228 lb/sec- in = M., i.e. the massin flow rate necessary to reliably produce 100%
hole clearance for aspect ratio 2 holes, e.g. holes which are twice as deep as their
diameters.
[0027] For each solder levelling system, while theoretical flow rate calculations yield
unacceptable hole clearing results, it has been found that there exists a flow rate
or energy level which results in reliable greater than 99 percent hole clearing and
that this can be determined empirically by increasing the flow rate and corresponding
energy level until greater than 99% hole clearing is achieved.
[0028] Referring now to Figures 11 and 12, a diagrammatic view of solder pot 30 is illustrated
in which throat 32 is shown as illustrated, with edge 200 forming the aforementioned
weir. The solder pot in general includes a chamber with a slanted gutter 202 supported
on struts 204, 206 and 208 as illustrated, such that the solder dumped over weir 200
moves in the direction of arrow 210 towards the bottom right hand side. The bottom
212 of solder pot 30 is also angled downwardly and rearwardly to a reservoir 214 into
which is positioned impeller 82 of pump 80. Throat 32 is here illustrated as including
top and bottom walls 216 and 218, with edge 200 of wall 218 forming the aforementioned
weir.
[0029] In operation, solder is pumped by impeller 82 up throat 32 as illustrated by arrows
220, with the return illustrated by arrows 222. As illustrated in Figures 11 and 12
it will be appreciated that solder pot 30 has an additional throat 230 which serves
as a standpipe and through which the shaft 232 of motor 80 and impeller 82 project.
In one embodiment, the level of the solder in throat 230 is maintained by the standpipe
through which additional solder is added to the solder pot, which standpipe regulates
the level 234 of the solder. In the Figure 2 embodiment, the aforementioned drop tube
is used to add solder.
[0030] Having above indicated a preferred embodiment of the present invention, it will occur
to those skilled in the art that modifications and alternatives can be practiced within
the spirit of the invention. It is accordingly intended to define the scope of the
invention only as indicated in the following claims.
1. A solder levelling system for use in vapor phase soldering of a workpiece having
through holes comprising :
a vapor chamber;
a near-horizontal throat communicating with said chamber;
means for generating a vapor within said chamber;
means for limiting the height of the vapor within said chamber to a level below the
opening of said throat;
a solder pot within said chamber having an opening in line with said throat;
means for transporting said workpiece along a near-horizontal path through said throat
into and out of said solder pot; and
means including nozzles positioned in said chamber astride said path between said
throat and said solder pot for directing streams of liquid against opposing sides
of said workpiece as said workpiece is transported from said solder pot to said throat.
2. The system of claim 1 wherein one of said nozzles projects a first liquid stream
near normal to a surface of said workpiece and wherein the other of said nozzles projects
a second liquid stream at an angle to the opposing surface of said workpiece.
3. The system of claim 2 wherein said second stream is angled towards said solder
pot.
4. The system of claim 3 wherein said second stream has an angle with respect to the
normal to said other surface of said workpiece of less than 25°.
5. The system of claim 1 wherein the flow rate of said liquid is adjusted above that
threshold at which through hole clearance is achieved better than 99% of the time,
said threshold representing a predetermined stream impingement energy depending on
the nozzle aperture, the density of the liquid and the aspect ratio of the holes.
6. The system of claim 1 wherein said stream projecting means includes means for adjusting
the angle and offset of said nozzles relative to said path.
7. The system of claim 6 wherein said adjusting means includes a frame, a carriage
for each of said nozzles translatably mounted to said frame, a toothed sector pivoted
to each of said carriages, means for affixing an end of each of said nozzles to a
corresponding sector such that each of said nozzles is rotatable with the pivoting
of the corresponding sector, and detent means mounted to a respective carriage and
cooperating with the toothed portion of a corresponding sector for selectively preventing
the pivoting of the corresponding sector.
8. The system of claim 7 wherein said nozzle end affixing means includes a bar having
one end attached to the corresponding nozzle end, said bar being pivoted on the corresponding
sector at the corresponding nozzle end, the other end of said bar being securable
to the sector adjacent the toothed portion thereof at at least two locations.
9. The system of claim 1 wherein said vapor height limiting means includes cooling
coils disposed about said throat.
10. The system of claim 1 wherein said vapor limiting means includes cooling coils
disposed within said chamber.
11. The system of claim 1 wherein said solder pot includes a reservoir, a standpipe
communicating with said reservoir, an angled throat communicating with said reservoir
and having an opening with a lower lip defining a weir over which solder is permitted
to fall into said reservoir, and means for recirculating solder from said receiver
into said standpipe.
12. The system of claim 11 wherein said solder pot further includes a feed tube communicating
with said reservoir below the level of the solder in said reservoir.
13. The system of claim 1 wherein said transporting means includes parallel drive
members positioned to either side of said throat, and a frame adapted to receive said
workpiece, said frame being secured at either side thereof to said drive members.
14. The system of claim 13 wherein the spacing between the entry point of the throat
to the chamber and the solder pot opening is less than the length of said frame such
that said frame may be canti- livered over the space between said throat and said
solder pot opening.
15. The system of claim 13 wherein said frame includes three channeled members comprising
opposing sides and a bottom and further including a slidable transverse member and
a leaf spring member coacting therewith and with the frame sides for removably securing
a workpiece in said frame.
16. The system of claim 15 wherein said leaf spring member is U-shaped having ends
at least one of which is removably attachable to one of the sides of the frame.
17. A method of hole-clearing and solder levelling for use in a vapor phase soldering
system in which a workpiece having holes is immersed in solder and then removed along
a near-horizontal path comprising providing two streams of liquid heated above the
solder temperature with each stream directed against an opposing side of the workpiece
as the workpiece is removed along the near-horizontal path, the energy of the impinging
streams being adjusted above a predetermined threshold at which greater than 99% hole
clearing is achieved.
18. The method of claim 17 wherein said predetermined threshold is empirically derived
by increasing stream flow and observing at what flow rate greater than 99% hole clearing
is achieved.
19. A method for minimizing solder sag in a vapor phase solder levelling system in
which a printed wiring board is immersed in solder and then withdrawn comprising the
steps of :
transporting the board along a near-horizontal path into and out of the solder; and
directing jets of hot liquid against opposing sides of the board after it is withdrawn
from the solder and is travelling along the near-horizontal path.
20. A method of controlling the thickness of the solder remaining on a printed wiring
board during a vapor phase solder levelling operation in which a printed wiring board
is immersed in solder and then withdrawn comprising the steps of :
transporting the board along a near-horizontal path into and out of the solder;
directing jets of hot liquid against opposing sides of the board after it is withdrawn
from the solder and is travelling along the near-horizontal path; and
angling the jets to control the thickness of the remaining solder.
21. The method of claim 20 wherein the jet impinging on the top surface of the board
impinges substantially normal to the board and wherein the jet impinging on the bottom
surface of the board impinges at an angle to the board other than 90°.
22. The method of claim 20 wherein the jet impinging on the bottom surface of the
board impinges substantially normal to the board and wherein the jet impinging on
the top surface of the board impinges at an angle to the board other than 90°.
23. Apparatus for hole clearing and solder levelling for use in a vapor phase soldering
system in which a workpiece having holes is immersed in solder and then removed along
a near-horizontal path comprising :
a vapor phase chamber;
a solder pot in said chamber;
means for transporting said workpiece along said near-horizontal path into and out
of said solder pot; and
means for providing two streams of liquid heated above the solder temperature with
each stream directed against an opposing side of the said workpiece after said workpiece
is removed from said solder pot along the near-horizontal path, the energy of stream
impingement being adjusted above a predetermined threshold at which greater than 99%
hole clearing is achieved.
24. Apparatus for minimizing solder sag in a vapor phase solder levelling system in
which a printed wiring board is immersed in solder and then withdrawn, comprising
:
means for transporting the board along a near-horizontal path into and out of the
solder; and
means for directing jets of hot liquid against opposing sides of the board after it
is withdrawn from the solder and is travelling along the near-horizontal path.
25. Apparatus for controlling the thickness of solder remaining on a printed circuit
board during a vapor phase solder levelling operation in which a printed wiring board
is immersed in solder and then withdrawn
means for transporting the board along a near-horizontal path into and out of the
solder; and
means for directing jets of hot liquid against opposing sides of the board after it
is withdrawn from the solder and is travelling along the near-horizontal path, whereby
the solder thickness on the top side of the board may be made less than the thickness
of the solder on the bottom side of the board.
26. The apparatus of claim 25 and further including means for angling said jets to
control the thickness of the solder remaining on the board.
27. A method of controlling the thickness of the solder remaining on a printed wiring
board during a vapor phase solder levelling operation in which a printed wiring board
is immersed in solder and then withdrawn comprising the steps of :
transporting the board along a near-horizontal path into and out of the solder; and
directing jets of hot liquid against opposing sides of the board after it is withdrawn
from the solder and is travelling along the near-horizontal path, whereby the solder
thickness on the top side of the board remaining after the operation can be made less
than that on the bottom side of the board.