[0001] The present invention relates to peroxide activation and in particular to the activation
of compositions containing hydrogen peroxide or persalts which generate hydrogen peroxide
under the conditions of use.
[0002] Conventionally, one class of bleaching agents comprises hydrogen peroxide and persalts
that generate it in use conditions. Such bleaching agents are comparatively ineffective
at stain removal from fabrics or hard surfaces at low washing temperatures, such as
ambient to 60°C. Accordingly, and especially in the wake of increased energy prices,
considerable efforts have been devoted to activating the bleaching agents at those
temperatures.
[0003] One class of activators which have received intermittent attention comprise transition
metals. It has long been recognised that first row transition metals such as iron
or copper catalyse peroxide decomposition, but harnessing the reaction between the
two components to enhance low temperature stain removal has proven to be rather elusive.
The teaching provided by the prior art in some respects appears to be self-conflicting
and in other aspects the generalised statements appear to be unwarranted by the experimental
support.
[0004] One transition metal that appears to be capable of activating hydrogen peroxide or
persalts is manganese. Passing reference is made to it in US-A-3156654, but the patent
asserts that it must be used in conjunction with chelating agents which meet certain
criteria of which most examples fall under the heading aminocarboxylic acids. When
the process was tested using a representative aminocarboxylate and hydrogen peroxide
under buffered alkaline conditions, the system with a catalytic amount of manganese
sulphate bleached no better than hydrogen peroxide alone at the same conditions. Clearly
US-A-3156654 represented mere speculation in so far as it referred to manganese.
[0005] US-A-3532634 also described compositions containing a transition metal and a persalt,
but they demonstrated activation only in the presence of a range of weakly chelating
agents, different from those in US-A-3156654 when an organic persalt activator was
present as well. Stronger chelating agents such as aminocarboxylic acids were specifically
excluded. In a comparative example no activation was apparent when manganous sulphate
and picolinic acid was employed with a heavy duty detergent composition to which sodium
perborate had been added.
[0006] In more recent times EP-A-72166 describes a multi-component activator system for
persalts including two metal catalysts and a range of sequestrants of which one major
specified class comprises amino(poly)carboxylates. It will be recognised that these
sequestrants are the same as those referred to in US-A-3156654 and those specifically
excluded from US-A-3532634. Consequently this specificatior provides no direct teaching
upon the provision of a single metal catalyst system, when similar comments apply
as for the repeat test described in the passage relating to US-A-3156654.
[0007] Most recently, in EP-A-82563, there is described activation of a persalt by manganese
but it demands the presence of a carbonate. In practice, fabrics typically arc stained
with a variety of different types of stains, including clay or grease stains which
respond relatively poorly to cleansing compositions built with carbonate and presumably
in recognition of such practical matters the specification includes a list of inorganic
and organic complexing builders for use in conjunction with carbonate. Indeed, all
their Examples include one or more auxiliary builders. However the Examples and particularly
Examples I, III and XII show clearly the deleterious effect of substituting at least
part of the carbonate by their main auxiliary detergent builder, namely sodium tripolyphosphate.
It is thus a reasonable inference from EP-A-82563 that the key to employing manganese
as a persalt promoter rests with the use of carbonate and the other builders retard
or obstruct that effect. This is fully consistent with experimental observations that
inorganic builders such as tripolyphosphates and organic complexing builders such
as aminocarboxylates as sole builder complex the manganese suc-, that no activation
of persalts is noticeable.
[0008] Surprisingly, it has now been found that not all organic complexing builders exhibit
the same deleterious effect upon manganese activation of persalts.
[0009] According to the present invention there is provided a process for activating hydrogen
peroxide in which hydrogen peroxide or a persalt that generates hydrogen peroxide
is brought into contact with a catalytic amount of a manganous salt in the presence
of a substantial excess of an organic complexing builder selected from alkali metal
citrates and citric acid.
[0010] The manganese used in the present invention can be derived from any manganese (II)
salt, such as manganous sulphate and manganous chloride, or from any manganese compound
or substrate which delivers manganese (II) ions in aqueous solution. The substrate
can comprise an absorbent particulate or non particulate substrate which previously
has absorbed a manganous salt. Non particulate substrates include fibres, foams, sponges
and films often made from certain cellulose ethers, alginates, polyvinyl alcohols
or polyvinyl pyrrolidene polymers. Particulate substrates include clays, including
bentonites, and any of the general classes of zeolites that hitherto have been proposed
for incorporation in washing compositions, in for example FR-A-2225568, DE-A-2422655
or BE-A-849382, which include manganous exchanged zeolites A, X and Y.
[0011] The effect of increasing the concentration of soluble manganese salt in the washing
solution first results in enhanced activation of hydrogen peroxide and further increase
then results in a progressive reduction in the enhancement, possibly even in impairment
of stain bleaching performance. Thus, the amount of manganous salt to employ represents
a balance between enhanced activation of hydrogen peroxide and the deleterious effect
possibly resulting from an increased propensity to deposit an insoluble salt upon
the surface being bleached. Expressed in terms of the weight of manganous ion, it
is desirable for a bleaching solution to contain at least 0.5 mg/l and typically not
more than 10 mg/l available for complexing with the citrate or citric acid. Use of
amounts of available manganese above the upper specified amount tend towards impaired
bleaching. In practice, it is often convenient to select the available manganous concentration
within the range of 1 to 5 mg/l.
[0012] The concentration of the citrate/citric acid is desirably at least 10 times that
of the manganous ion, and in particular at least 100 mg/l. It is convenient, often,
to select the citrate/citric acid concentration in the range of 100 to 5000 mg/l since
such a concentration range can readily be obtained by dissolution of citrate/citric
acid built washing composition in the washing/bleaching bath at recommended dosages.
[0013] The washing/bleaching bath also contains hydrogen peroxide at a concentration sufficient
to provide normally at least 5 and preferably at least 20 mg/1 available oxygen (avox)
in solution. For stain removal in domestic washing processes the avox is frequently
selected in the range of 35 to 200 mg/l avox, for combined stain removal and disinfection
often from 200 to 500 mg/l avox and for textile bleaching often from 1000 to 10,000
mg/l avox. The hydrogen peroxide can be added as such or introduced as any persalt
including alkali metal perborates, especially sodium perborate tetrahydrate, trihydrate
or monohydrate, urea peroxide, or as an adduct with sodium sulphate and sodium or
potassium chloride. The presence of carbonate can be tolerated within the system according
to the invention and thus sodium percarbonate may be employed.
[0014] For effective washing/bleaching of stains, it is especially desirable to produce
alkaline conditions particularly from about pH 8 to about pH 10.5, and for textile
bleaching especially from about pH 10 to about pH 12-13. This can be achieved either
by introduction of an alkali such as sodium hydroxide under automatic or manual control
as is feasible within commercial laundry or industrial textile bleaching operations,
or more conveniently in domestic washing/bleaching operations by the presence of an
alkaline buffer or buffer combination. It will be recognised that both the persalts
and the citrate builder (especially when added as trisodium citrate) enable the washing
solution to reach an alkaline pH automatically.
[0015] The aforementioned components can be added individually in controlled doses to the
solution, or more conveniently where the components have a compatible physical form,
two or more of them can be formulated in the precalculated proportions to yield the
desired concentration of each in use. For domestic use it is easiest to employ particulate
mixtures. Accordingly, in a further aspect of the present invention there is provided
a particulate activator composition comprising at least 0.5 and preferably 1-5 parts
by weight of a manganous salt, calculated on the basis of the weight of the manganous
ion part thereof, and from 100 to 5000, preferably 250 to 2000 parts by weight of
the citric acid/alkali metal citrate complexing builder. Such a formulation can be
provided as such or be aggregated to form tablets, granulates, pills or the like thereby
permitting the unitary dosing of precalculated quantity of each component to a hydrogen
peroxide solution.
[0016] In a yet further aspect of the present invention, there is incorporated with the
aforementioned activator composition from 200 to 4000, preferably 500 to 2000 parts
by weight of a persalt, thereby forming a bleach composition that can be employed
by itself or as an adjuvant with a surfactant composition, particularly an unbuilt
composition or alternatively as a component in a surfactant washing composition.
[0017] Thus, washing compositions according to the present invention comprise a bleaching
composition as outlined hereinabove in a weight amount of at least 5% and generally
from 10 to 60%, especially 15 to 50% of the composition, a surfactant, in a weight
amount of at least 2% to 70% and generally 5 to 50%, processing acids in a weight
of 0 to 40%, and other detergent adjuvants in a total amount of 0 to 20%.
[0018] The surfactants that can be employed in the present invention include anionic, nonionic,
zwitterionic or cationic surfactants or mixtures thereof, which are suitable for incorporation
in persalt-containing washing compositions. In practice they are selected to exhibit
water solubility.
[0019] The anionic surfactants are normally alkali metal or ammonium salts, especially sodium,
though a proportion of alkaline earth metal salts can be tolerated. One or more anionic
surfactants are often selected from linear alkyl benzene sulphonates, especially having
C
9-C
15 in the alkyl chain, alkyl sulphates, particularly C
10-C
22, olefin sulphonates, particularly C
10-C
24, alkane and/or hydroxyalkane sulphonates, often C
10-C
24, alkyl phenoxy ether sulphates, often with C
8-C
12 alkyl chain and 1-10 ethylene oxide units, alkyl ether sulphates often with C
10-C
20 alkyl chain and 1-10, preferably 2-4 ethylene oxide units and soaps, particularly
C
12-C
20. Various other anionic surfactants often provide at least part of the total added
including sulphocarboxylates, alkyl glyceryl ether sulphonates, monoglyceride sulphates
and sulphonates, and phosphated ethylene oxide-based nonionic surfactants.
[0020] The nonionic surfactants for incorporation in invention washing compositions generally
comprise condensation products of ethylene oxide and propylene oxide, typically 5-30
units, with an aliphatic or aromatic alcohol or an aliphatic acid amine or amide.
In such nonionic surfactants, the hydropholic aliphatic moiety often has a chain length
of C
8-C
22; and is C
6-C
12 when present in an alkyl aromatic group. Other usable nonionic surfactants are condensates
of glycerol and sorbitol.
[0021] It is convenient, usually to employ both an anionic surfactant component and a nonionic
surfactant component in washing compositions, in a weight ratio often from 10:1 to
1:10.
[0022] Semipolar surfactants are useable herein and include water-soluble amine oxides,
phosphine oxides and sulphur oxides, each containing a C
10-C
22 alkyl chain and often 2 C
1-C
3 alkyl chains.
[0023] Zwitterionic surfactants herein are often selected from water-soluble derivatives
of aliphatic quternary ammonium, phosphonium and sulphonium cationic compounds in
which the aliphatic moieties are straight or branched, and in which one substituent
is Ca-C18 and one terminates in an anionic water-solubilizing group, especially a
sulphonate group for example alkyl-hydroxy-propane-sulphonates and alkyl-dimethyl-ammonio-hydroxy-
propane-sulphonates.
[0024] The cationic surface active agents when employed are often selected from quaternary
ammonium compounds having one or two C
8-C
20 straight or branched hydrophobic groups, e.g. cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide or
chloride, dioctadecyl dimethyl ammonium chloride, and the fatty alkyl amines.
[0025] It will be understood that various commonly used detergent builders including polyphosphates
and amino carboxylic acid complexing builders have been shown to prevent manganese
catalysing hydrogen peroxide bleaching of stains under conditions identical to those
in which citrate enables the manganese to activate. The presence of such auxiliary
builders tends to reduce the citrate/manganese/hydrogen peroxide activation, to an
increasing extent as the manganese complexes with the auxiliary builder. Despite that,
in practice it is desirable to take into account the other functions that such builders
perform and a balance is struck between the possible benefits of adding them, such
as improved sequestation of calcium and magnesium ions, or improved synergism with
anionic surfactants especially alkyl benzene sulphonates and the somewhat impaired
removal of bleachable stains. Accordingly, washing compositions and processes of the
present invention tolerate the presence of auxiliary builders selected from both water
soluble or insoluble particulate builders. Such builders can include alkali metal
polyphosphates, pyrophosphates, polymetaphosphates and alkali metal silicates as well
as zeolites obeying the general formula (M
20)
x.(AI
20
3).(Si0
3)y in which M is a monovalent metal especially sodium, x is 0.7 to 1.5 and y is 1.3
to 4.0, including zeolites A and X and mixtures thereof. Auxiliary organic builders
include nitrilotracetic acid, sodium salt and related amino carboxylic acid salts.
The amount of auxiliary builder present depends upon the extent to which the user
is willing to tolerate impaired performance in bleachable stains. As a guide it is
preferable for the weight of auxiliary builder to be less than the weight of citrate,
lest some benefit is still retained even when the proportion of citrate falls to as
low as 20% of the total builder weight. In practice this means that it is normally
selected in the range of 0-30%, and often represents 5-20% of the total formulation.
Indeed, in view of the quality of citrate as builder in its own right, the addition
of such auxiliary builders is not necessary, and their inclusion may be primarily
at low levels of e.g. up to 5-10% for other functions such as pH control etc, rather
than for the normal function of overcoming hardness.
[0026] The processing aid, when present, is usually selected from sodium and/or magnesium
sulphate.
[0027] The detergent auxiliary agents present are normally selected from soil antiredeposition
agents, dye transfer inhibitors, optical brightening agents, peroxy stabilisers, corrosion
inhibitors, bactericides, foam enhancers, foam inhibitors, thickeners, absorbents,
abrasives, diluents, dyes, perfumes and proteolytic enzymes. Amongst the auxiliary
agents, carboxymethyl cellulose salts and polyvinylpyrrolidines deserve mention as
SARDs, the various aminocarboxylates, aminomethylenephosphonates, hydroxy quinolines
and dipicolinic acid as peroxy stabilisers and/or dye transfer inhibitors, silicates
for corrosion inhibition, quaternary ammonium or pyridinium halides as bactericides,
alkanolamides and ethylene oxide/propylene oxide copolymers to regulate foaming. Derivatives
of diaminostilbene sulphonic acid, diarylpyrazolines and aminocoumarins are examples
of OBA's, anhydrous sodium or magnesium sulphate are examples of absorbents and diluents,
silica or maleic modified cellulose, polyethylene oxide, e.g. above MW of 10,000,
maleic anhydride copolymers with ethylene, styrene or methylvinyl ether, especially
above 50,000 MW, or polyvinyl pyrrolidine as a thickener, and silica or kieselguhr
as abrasives. Naturally, it is preferred to select dyes and perfumes known not to
interact readily with peroxygen compounds, and to coat any enzyme with water soluble/dispersible
coating for storage protection.
[0028] The processes for washing articles according to the present invention can be carried
out at a temperature from ambient temperature up to the boiling point of the washing
solution. Compositions according to the present invention are particularly well suited
to a process at which washing or bleaching is carried out by steeping at ambient or
by heating the solution to a temperature from about 25° to 60°. Alternatively the
washing and bleaching processes may be effected by heating up a cold washing solution.
A combination of processes can be used, such as cold steeping followed by a wash at
30, 40 or 50
oC.
[0029] In general, the rate of removal of stains is enhanced by employing a higher temperature
and by higher Avox. concentrations, but by virtue of the rate at which the invention
washing compositions dissolve or are dispersed in the wash solution, the contact period
between solution and fabric can conveniently be as short as 5 minutes. Longer periods
of for example typically 10 to 30 minutes and up to 1 hour tend to provide greater
soil removal. In cold washing or steeping even longer periods can be employed, such
as steeping overnight.
[0030] Having described the invention in general terms, specific demonstrations of the effectiveness
of the invention are given by way of example only.
Example 1 and comparisons 2-5
[0031] In each of these Examples and comparisons swatches of red wine stained cotton limbric
cloth were washed for 20 minutes in an aqueous alkaline solution formed by dissolving
hydrogen peroxide (0.375 g/1) manganous sulphate tetrahydrate (8 mg/l, providing 2
mg/l Mn
2+) and builder in water buffered to pH 10.1 with sodium hydroxide, and which contained
250 mg/l hardness in a Ca:Mg weight ratio of 3:1. The washing trials were carried
out at 40
0C in a laboratory scale washing machine available from the US Testing Corporation,
under the trademark TERGOTOMETER. After each swatch had been washed, it was rinsed
with cold water, air dried and its reflectance (R
w) measured using an Instrumental Colour System MICROMATCH reflectance spectrophotometer
equipped with a xenon lamp, light source filtered to approximate to daylight. The
reflectance was compared with the original unstained cloth (R
u) and the stained cloth (R
s) and the percentage stain removal calculated using the formula
[0032] 
[0033] The stain removal gain shown is the difference attributable to adding the builder
manganese to the bleach solution.
[0034] The results are summarised in Table 1.

[0035] From Table 1, it can be seen that neither of the two well known classes of builders,
namely the aminocarboxylate salts and the phosphate salts allowed manganese to catalyse
hydrogen peroxide stain removal in alkaline conditions and secondly that even though
sodium carbonate did demonstrate some gain in stain removal, sodium citrate gained
nearly twice as much at only half the molar concentration.
[0036] The activaator composition corresponding to the process in Example 1 comprise 8 parts
by weight manganese sulphate tetrahydrate per 1000 parts by weight of trisodium citrate.
Examples 6 and 7 and Comparisons 8, 9, 10
[0037] The washing procedure and testing of Example 1 was repeated except that the washing
solutions were allowed to attain their natural pH and the peroxide in solution was
provided by sodium perborate tetrahydrate added at 1.15 g/1 and in Example 7 and Comparison
10, 4 times the weight of manganous salt was added.
[0038] The results are summarised in Table 2

[0039] From Table 2 it can be seen that the effect of introducing the active oxygen in the
form of sodium perborate would normally depress the stain removal but by adding sodium
citrate as well, a substantial gain in stain removal can be achieved. However, the
practical benefit tends to diminish as the concentration of manganous salt increases
beyond its optimum, though the gain over the same solution but in the absence of citrate
remains extremely marked.
[0040] The bleach composition corresponding to the Example 6 or 7 processes comprises 8
respectfully or 32 parts by weight manganese sulphate tetrahydrate, 1000 parts by
weight trisodium citrate and 1150 parts by weight sodium perborate tetrahydrate.
Example 11 and Comparison 12
[0041] In this Example and Comparison, washing solutions according to Example 6 and Comparison
8 were made, but employing additionally a phosphate-free detergent composition called
US Tide (Trademark) at a concentration of 6 g/1 having a composition analysed as approximately
[0042] linear alkyl (av C11.5) benzene sulphonate (sodium salt) 12.5%, nonionic ethoxylated
surfactant 2.6%, zeolite A (sodium) 30%, sodium sulphate 27%, sodium carbonate 20%,
phosphate 0.3%, carboxymethyl cellulose, OBA and other detergent adjuncts 1% and the
balance water. The conditions of washing and testing further samples of the same swatches
were exactly the same as in Example 1.
[0043] In Example 11, there was a stain removal of 49% whereas in Comparison 12 the stain
removal was only 41%. This indicates that it is beneficial to employ a manganous salt
in the presence of trisodium citrate and sodium perborate in the presence of a substantial
concentration of a detergent composition, which provides auxiliary builders and surfactants.
[0044] The Examples herein show clearly the advantage of employing citrate as builder for
manganese activated persalat/H
20
2 bleaching in comparison with several other commonly used builders. They were carried
out in calcium-containing hard water. The use of calcium and certain other alkaline
earth metals to promote manganese activation is the subject of an application of even
date.
1. A process for activating hydrogen peroxide in which hydrogen peroxide or a persalt
that generates hydrogen peroxide is brought into contact with a catalytic amount of
a manganous salt in the presence of a subtantial excess of an organic complexing builder
characterised in that the organic complexing builder is selected from akali metal
citrates and citric acid.
2. A process according to claim 1 characterised in that the concentration of manganous
ion in solution is from 0.5 to 10 mg/l. 1
3. A process according to claim 2 characterised in that the concentration of manganous
ion in solution is from 1 to 5 mg/l.
4. A process according to any preceding claim characterised in that the ion concentration
of citrate/citric acid in solution is at least 10 times that of the manganous ion.
5. A process according to claim 4 characterised in that the concentration of citrate/citric
acid in solution is from 100 to 5000 mg/l.
6. A process according to any preceding claim characterised in that the hydrogen peroxide
added as such or in the form of a persalt provides a concentration of at least 20
mg/l available oxygen (avox) in solution.
7. A process according to claim 6 characterised in that the avox is from 35 to 200
mg/l for stain removal.
8. A process according to any preceding claim characterised in that the bleaching
solution has a pH of from pH 8 to pH 10.5.
9. A process according to any preceding claim which is carried out at ambient to 60°C
or commences within that range.
10. An activator composition comprising a manganese salt and a builder characterised
in that it contains from 0.5 to 5 parts by weight of a manganous ion salt calculated
as the weight of the manganous ion and from 100 to 5000 parts by weight of an alkali
metal citrate and/or citric acid. ,
11. A composition according to claim 10 characterised in that it comprises from 1
to 5 parts manganous salt and from 250 to 2000 parts of alkali metal citrate and/or
citric acid.
12. A bleach composition comprising a persalt and an activator characterised in that
it comprises the activator composition according to either of claims 10 or 11 together
with 200 to 4000 parts by weight of a persalt.
13. A bleach composition according to claim 12 characterised in that it contains 500
to 2000 parts of the persalt.
14. A washing composition comprising a surfactant and a bleach characterised in that
it contains at least 5% w/w of the bleach composition according to claim 12 or 13,
from 2 to 70% w/w of one or more surfactants, from 0 to 40% w/w of processing aids,
and from 0 to 20% w/w of detergent adjuvants.
15. A composition according to claim 14 characterised in that it contains additionally
from 0 to 30% w/w of an auxiliary builder.
16. A composition according to claim 14 or 15 characterised in that it contains from
15 to 50% of the bleaching composition, and from 5 to 50% surfactant.
17. A process or composition according to any preceding claim characterised in that
trisodium citrate is employed as the complexing builder.
18. A process or composition according to any preceding claim characterised in that
the persalt is sodium perborate tetrahydrate or monohydrate.
19. Any process for the activation of hydrogen peroxide or a persalt, or any activation
composition or bleach composition or washing composition including one or more novel
features substantially as described herein or novel combination of features substantially
as described herein.