[0001] The present invention relates to a pre-threaded container closure, of the type serving
as a screw cap for engagement on a neck of the container, for example the neck of
a bottle.
[0002] Pre-threaded container closures are known in two main forms, the metal screw cap
and the injection moulded plastic screw cap. Examples of plastic caps are disclosed
in GB-A-2,116,529 and in WO-A-82/02182. In each case the gaskets are aimed at achieving
high compression of the gasket material around the outside corner of the bottle neck
rim.
[0003] This "outer corner seal" placement of the gasket has been evolved after many years
of development with aluminium bottle caps and has been found to give satisfactory
protection against the tendency of the cap to "dome" when subjected to high internal
pressures. This doming of the cap end panel has the effect of lifting the cap top
panel upwardly at the centre and hence also upwardly to lesser degrees at stations
radially outwardly of the centre, but the gasket compression on the outside corner
is virtually unaffected, and may even be increased slightly, as a result of this doming
which is a known phenomenon in both aluminium pre-threaded caps and moulded plastics
pre-threaded caps. The "outer corner seal" placement is thus highly advantageous with
a good quality glass bottle.
[0004] However, problems arise with regard to the quality of the glass finish, firstly with
regard to the difficulty of ensuring close tolerances on the bottle neck radius with
the result that some bottles may have differing internal diameters and to some extent
differing external diameters and secondly with regard to the use of returnable bottles
where a re-used bottle may show signs of damage sustained during a previous "trip"
(this damage manifesting itself as roughening of the outside corner of the glass,
or chips on the glass, or even small cracks which have not been detected during the
quality control inspection of returned bottles).
[0005] With a glass bottle neck on the limits of its radius tolerance, the sealing performance
with a pre-threaded cap, as opposed to an RO (rolled-on) cap, will be disadvantageously
affected because the gasket is intended to achieve a desired compression against the
outside corner of the glass bearing in mind the expected gap between the outside corner
and the internal surface of the cap skirt, so a larger than normal outside diameter
of the bottle runs a risk of jamming of the cap during screwing-on rotation of the
cap, and a smaller than normal outside diameter to the cap can result in inadequate
gasket compression for sealing.
[0006] The problem of damage to the outside corner manifests itself as increased friction
between the gasket and the neck during screwing-on cap rotation and hence either the
use of a fixed torque applicator will result in inadequate axial compression of the
gasket for sealing, or alternatively if the cap is screwed on tight enough to ensure
the correct gasket compression the application torque, and hence the removal torque,
will be excessively high and unacceptable for practical considerations of the need
for the bottle to be opened, without the use of special tools, by the consumer. The
problem of high application torque with pre-threaded caps has been tackled by ensuring
lubrication between the gasket and the bottle as in EP-A-0 129,309.
[0007] The problems of bottle diameter variation and of neck damage are not so important
with regard to an RO cap where threads are rolled into the unthreaded cap blank using
the rigid bottle neck as a die and at the same time an axial loading and radial contraction
of the corner of the cap (the "reform" step) are used to shape the cap to fit the
individual bottle. Furthermore, the avoidance of any rotation of the cap during the
application process has the advantageous result that the gasket composition will be
pressed into any imperfections on the bottle neck rim and achieve the desired seal.
With pre-threaded caps, for the reason stated above, ------------------------------these
problems are considerable and it is an object of the present invention to provide
for sealing of containers whose neck rims are damaged and/or of non-standard size.
[0008] As an alternative to the "outer corner seal" placement of the gasket it is known
from GB-A-1148089 to position a moulded annular gasket on the end panel of a tin-plate
rolled on closure of the "twist-off crown" type where it will contact the inside corner
of the container neck.
[0009] Accordingly, the present invention envisages the surprising step of using a flowed
in gasket and achieving a seal which requires no gasket composition in contact with
the outer corner of the container rim, and instead employs a particular profile to
the container, and/or the gasket, and/or the closure to proviae for adequate sealing
action on tne inner corner of the container neck as the closure is screwed on.
[0010] One aspect ot tne present invention provides a process of closing a container having
an externally tnreaaea neck, comprising: taking a container closure of a first plastics
material, having an end panel, an internally threaded skirt, and a separately formed
gasket of a softer second plastics material on the end panel and screwing tnat pre-threaded
closure onto the container neck to close tne container neck, to achieve sealing contact
of tne end of the container neck rim without contact of the material of said gasket
against the outer corner of the bottle neck rim, characterised in that the gasket
is a flowed in gasket applied to tne pre-threaded closure without moulding, before
the closure is itself applied to tne container.
[0011] A second aspect of the present invention provides a plastic pre-threaded container
closure having a separately formed gasket of a plastics material softer tnan tnat
of the closure, the gasket having a surface configuration such tnat its surface is
further from the median plane of the end plane of the closure at a radially inner
location than it is at a radially outer location, whereby the gasket seals against
the,inner corner of the container neck rim without contact of gasket composition against
the outer corner of the container neck rim, characterised in that the gasket is a
flowed-in gasket formed without moulding.
[0012] Yet a third aspect of the present invention provides a pre-threaded plastic container
closure having an internally threaded skirt, ah end panel, and a separately formed
gasket, characterised in that the gasket is a flowed in gasket applied to the closure
without moulding; and in that the end panel includes a rib embedded in the flowed
in gasket to generate localised increased compression of the gasket material in an
annular region thereof adjacent to the location of the internal corner of the neck
rim of a container on which the closure is to be used, so the flowed in gasKet seals
against the internal corner of the container neck rim substantially without contact
between the gasket and the outer neck rim corner.
[0013] A fourth aspect of the invention provides, in combination, a container having a threaded
neck; and a plastic closure having an end panel bearing a separately formed plastic
gasket of a material softer than that of the closure, and an internally threaded skirt
joined to said end panel for engaging the container neck; the end of the container
neck being shaped to encourage movement of the gasket composition radially inwardly
of tne end panel during closing of the container using that cap, to effect a seal
on tne inside corner of the container neck, characterised in that the gasket is a
flowed in gasket applied to the closure without moulding.
[0014] Preferably the flowed in gasket is formed of a hot melt composition applied to the
closure in molten form and allowed to solidify quickly on cooling.
[0015] The step of relying on sealing at the inside corner of the container neck is a very
surprising one to take unless the material of the cap is relatively rigid, or the
cap end panel is very thick, because of the natural expectation that the "doming"
of the cap will have the effect of relaxing gasket compression where the compression
arises at the inside corner, despite the fact that gasket compression at the outside
corner is substantially unaffected by doming. The dangers of such doming are discussed
in WO-A-82/021282, on page 2, lines 7 to 30. Furthermore, an accurately moulded gasket
would be expected to be necessary in order to ensure the precise placement of the
gasket and the accuracy of engagement of the gasket into the container neck. However,
we have found that the quality of the seal achieved using this "inside corner sealing"
placement of the gasket does not give rise to unacceptable problems through "doming"
but does overcome the independent problems due to wide tolerances on the container
neck diameter, including the internal diameter, and damage of the rim of a returnable
glass container on a previous trip (because most of the damage will be experienced
on the outside corner and the inside corner is therefore relatively unharmed). Indeed,
the use of a flowed in gasket allows for wide tolerances on the "inside corner sealing"
surface of the container neck by virtue of the resilience of the gasket composition.
[0016] In order that the present invention may more readily be understood the following
description is given, merely by way of example, with reference to the accompanying
drawings in which:-
FIGURE 1 shows a diametral cross-section of the closure, with a partly sectional illustration
of the container neck, in this case a glass bottle neck to which the cap is to be
fitted, but illustrates the prior art form of cap with an"outer corner seal" placement
of the gasket;
FIGURE 2 is similar to Figure 1 and shows a first embodiment of the container closure
in accordance with the present invention, with the gasket just in contact with the
container neck but before any appreciable compression of the gasket during the screwing-on
process;
FIGURE 3 is a view, similar to Figure 2, but showing a different embodiment of cap
and gasket in accordance with the invention; and
FIGURE 4, again similar to Figure 1, shows a view of a further embodiment of the present
invention.
[0017] The prior art form of cap 1 shown in Figure 1 (in accordance with our GB-B-2,116,529)
has a gasket 2 positioned in the vicinity of the corner between the cap end panel
3 and the cap skirt 4 so that, as the cap 1 is screwed onto a bottle neck 5, the gasket
2 becomes pressed into sealing contact with the outside corner 6 of the bottle neck.
As explained above, imperfections in the glass and in particular damage caused by
previous "trips" of a returnable bottle, cause problems with regard to this corner
placement which is conventional in the art.
[0018] Figure 2 shows a first embodiment of a cap, again referenced 1, in accordance with
the present invention. In this case the gasket 2 is confined in a recess whose floor
8 slopes in a direction such that it is further from the median plane 3a of the end
panel 3 of the cap at the radially inner portion near an inner gasket-containment
bead 9 than it is at its outer portion near the corner between the end panel 3 and
the skirt 4. The free surface of the gasket which contacts the bottle neck rim 5 as
the bottle is closed, also slopes in the same way in relation to the median plane
of the end panel 3.
[0019] In this case the gasket 2 is formed by being flowed in to occupy the space defined
between the inner gasket-containment bead 9 and an outer gasket-containment bead 10,
and the gasket composition adopts the illustrated profile upon cooling.
[0020] As the cap 1 is screwed onto the bottle neck 5 the gasket 2 initially makes contact
with the top of the bottle neck rim but the inclination of the surface of the gasket
2-is such that the gasket composition moves down onto the inner corner 7 of the bottle
neck to provide the required "inner corner seal" action. In this case the slope of
the floor 8 of the gasket-receiving groove of the cap, and the shape of the gasket
2 itself, both contribute to ensure the desired "inner corner seal" action.
[0021] Figure 3 shows an alternative form of the gasket in which the gasket 2 assumes the
distinctly toroidal configuration by virtue of the high viscosity of the flowed in
composition, and is held in the flat-bottomed gasket-receiving groove by means of
the undercut of the inner gasket-containment bead 9 of Figure 2, and an undercut 11
in place of the outer gasket-containment bead 10of Figure 2. The slope of the surface
of the gasket 2 is entirely due to the thickness of the gasket and is such tnat as
the bottle cap is screwed down onto the bottle neck, the shape of the gasket 2 and
the shape of the bottle neck 5 co-operate to shift the gasket composition down towards
tne inner corner 7 of tne glass neck rim. Here the neck configuration and the gasket
shape co-operate to give the desired "inner corner seal" action.
[0022] Finally, Figure 4 shows a further flowed in gasket 2 in a cap 1 having a rib 13 formed
in the floor of the gasket-receiving groove between the inner gasket-containment bead
9 and the outer gasket-containment bead 10 analogous to those of Figure 2.
[0023] Although in this case the gasket has a free surface which has a slight inclination
in the same direction as that shown in Figure 2, this embodiment relies heavily on
the rib 13, embedded in the gasket, to ensure that there will be higher compression
of the gasket material between the rib 13 and the end face of the bottle neck near
the inner corner 7 of the neck rim, giving the desired result of high gasket compression
at the inner corner and some shifting of composition around onto the inner corner
for sealing thereon.
[0024] Yet a further possibility (not illustrated) is for the gasket to have a relatively
flat configuration and for at least part of the profiling to give the desired "inner
corper seal" action to be derived from the shape of the glass finish itself.
[0025] It will of course be understood that each of the embodiments of Figures 2 to 4 has
a configuration in which there is contact of the gasket with part of the end face
of the bottle neck but pronounced sealing contact around the inner corner 7 of the
bottle neck without, in any of these embodiments, any substantial contact between
the gasket 2 and the outer corner (referenced 6 in Figure 1) of the neck rim. Hence
if there is any roughening of the outer corner 6, or the evidence of chipped regions
of that corner, there will be no appreciable increase in application torque and removal
torque.
EXAMPLE 1
[0026] In order to illustrate the fact that the sealing performance is independent of the
quality of the glass finish, tests were carried out using 28 mm plastic caps on readily
available samples of returnable glass bottles. Ten examples of the bottle were used,
and tne second column illustrates the condition of the bottle, e.g. "chipped and cracked",
"rough", and "OK".
[0027] The hot melt composition used for forming the gasket was placed in two alternative
placements in identical caps, one corresponding to the"outer corner seal" action illustrated
in Figure 1, and the other corresponding to the "inner corner seal" action typical
of Figures 2 to 4. The venting pressure values as tested by means of an Owens Illinois
"Secure Seal Tester" are set out in the third column for the "outer corner seal" placement
of Figure 1 and in the fourth column for the "inner corner seal" placement in accordance
with the present invention. The venting pressure values quoted are measured in pounds
per square inch but with the "S.I." value measured in KPa shown in brackets alongside
the imperial value.
[0028] The bottom line of the table quotes the average film weight of the gasket and shows
that a slight reduction in the film weight was acnieved with the "inner corner seal"
placement shown in the fourth column despite the fact that the venting pressure results
were more consistent in that case.

[0029] As can be seen from the results quoted, bottles numbers 4 and 8 were so badly damaged
that there was no seal achieved with the "outer corner seal" placement of Figure 1.
Furthermore, bottles 5 and 7 achieved only a low venting pressure result (bearing
in mind that venting pressures in excess of 150 lb/in
2 (1034 kPa) are considered acceptable for pressure holding applications).
[0030] With the damaged samples numbers 4 and 8 with which no sealing was possible on the
"outer corner seal" placement, acceptable venting pressure values were obtained with
the "inner corner seal" placement, and with damaged sample number 5 where only a partially
effective seal was obtained on the "outer corner seal" placement a venting pressure
equivalent to the limit of acceptance was obtained. With the other samples numbers
6 and 7, on which values which were not clearly above the limit of acceptance were
achieved with the "outer corner seal" placement, in each case the values are improved
in the "inner corner seal" placement of the gasket.
EXAMPLE 2
[0031] To show that the present invention is not limited to glass containers, the test of
Example 1 was used with a set of ten polyethylene terephthalate plastic finish samples.
Because plastic bottles are not normally reusable, only the inner corner placement
was used and, as shown from Table 2 below, the results were acceptable. The normal
criterion for commercially acceptable plastic bottles is for the closure to hold a
pressure of at least 100 lb/in
2 (689 kPa) and for the closure not to be ejected from the container neck at a pressure
of 150 lb/in
2 (1034 kPa). All ten samples listed in Table 2 below satisfy this requirement.

[0032] It will of course be understood that the gasket can be formed by any one of several
different methods, many of which are illustrated in the drawings.
[0033] For example, a hot melt composition in accordance with our EP-A-0,129,309 and EP-A-0,129,310
may be flowed into the gasket-receiving groove of the pre-formed cap and distributed
throughout the groove by spinning of the cap and whereupon the cooling of the composition
causes it to adopt the desired configuration of the finished gasket. Such a gasket
may, if desired, be formed using the method of our GB-B-2,051,660 relating to microwave
heating of the plastisol to form the gasket with separate non-microwave heating of
the closure to enhance uniformity of heating of the plastisol.
[0034] The flowed in gasket may, if desired, be of a foamable composition so that the gasket
material can be caused to foam upon heating, for example as disclosed in published
GB-A-2,116,473.
[0035] The configuration of Figure 3 may be formed by flowing in a high viscosity thermoplastic
melt whose viscosity will then cause the resulting bead of the melt to adopt the Figure
3 generally toroidal configuration which it will retain on cooling.
[0036] As indicated above, we have surprisingly found that if the natural prejudice against
"inner corner seal" action is overcome the use of such a sealing action results in
the cap which has a much better sealing performance with damaged bottles than can
be achieved with the conventional "outer corner seal" action of Figure 1 (see the
third column in the Table), even with a flowed in gasket when the dimensional control
of the gasket profile cannot be so accurately controlled as with alternative gasket
manufacturing processes such as moulding or stamping from a flat sheet. This improved
performance is especially advantageous. There is not even any need to thicken the
cap end panel excessively to resist doming; although the cap domes under internal
pressure, the gasket is understood to lift slightly but the resilience of the flowed
in gasket is such that it is nevertheless able to keep the bottle sealed even after
such doming deformation of the cap end panel.
[0037] Although the present invention is particularly suitable with returnable glass bottles,
it may be applied to other containers, for instance plastic containers such as bottles.
1. A process of closing a container having an externally threaded neck, comprising:
taking a container closure of a first plastics material, having an end panel, an internally
threaded skirt, and a separately formed gasket of a softer second material on the
end panel; and screwing that pre-threaded closure onto the container neck to close
the container neck, to achieve sealing contact of the end of the container neck rim
without contact of the material of said gasket against the outer corner of the bottle
neck rim,characterised in that the gasket is a flowed in gasket applied to the pre-threaded
closure without moulding, before the closure is itself applied to the container.
2. A process according to claim 1, characterised in that the gasket is formed of a
hot melt composition which is introduced to the closure in molten form and solidifies
quickly upon cooling.
3. A process according to claim 2, characterised in that the achievement of inner
corner sealing is due to the configuration of the gasket.
4. A process according to claim 2 or 3, characterised in that the achievement of the
inner corner seal action is by virtue of the shape of the closure.
5. A process according to claim 3 or 4, characterised in that the gasket has a container-contacting
surface which is further from the median plane of the closure end panel at a radially
inner part than at a radially outer part thereof.
6. A process according to any one of claims 2 to 4, characterised in that the closure
includes an upstanding rib embedded in the gasket substantially in register with the
internal corner of the container neck rim to increase compression of the gasket in
the vicinity of the inner corner of the container neck rim.
7. A process according to any one of claims 1 to 6, characterised in that the achievement
of the inner corner seal action is due to the configuration of the container neck
rim.
8. A plastic pre-threaded container closure having a separately formed gasket of a
plastics material softer than that of the closure, the gasket having a surface configuration
such that its surface is further from the median plane of the end panel of the closure
at a radially inner location than it is at a radially outer location, whereby the
gasket seals against the inner corner of the container rim without contact of gasket
composition against the outer corner of the container neck rim, characterised in that
the gasket is a flowed in gasket formed without moulding.
9. A closure according to claim 8, characterised in that the closure has a groove
to receive the flowed in gasket and the groove has a floor configured such that at
a radially inner portion it is further from the median plane of the end panel of the
closure than it is at a radially outer portion.
10. A pre-threaded plastic container closure having an internally threaded skirt,
an end panel, and a separately formed gasket, characterised in that the gasket is
a flowed in gasket applied to the closure without moulding; and in that the end panel
includes a rib embedded in the flowed in gasket to generate localised increased compression
of the gasket material in an annular region thereof adjacent to the location of the
internal corner of the neck rim of a container on which the closure is to be used,
so the flowed in gasket seals against the internal corner of the container neck rim
substantially without contact between the gasket and the outer neck rim corner.
11. In combination, a container having a threaded neck; and a plastic closure having
an end panel bearing a separately-formed plastic gasket, of a material softer than
that of the closure, and an internally threaded skirt joined to said end panel for
engaging the container neck; the end of the container neck being shaped to encourage
movement of the gasket composition radially inwardly of the end panel during closing
of the container using that cap, to effect a seal on the inside corner of the container
neck, characterised in that the gasket is a flowed-in gasket applied to the closure
without moulding.
12. A closure according to any one of claims 8 to 10, or a combination according to
claim 11, characterised in that the gasket is formed of a hot melt composition applied
to the closure in molten form and allowed to solidify quickly on cooling.