TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0001] The invention relates to a thermal bonded, nonwoven fabric comprising entangled thermoplastic
conjugate fibers alone, or in combination with base fibers, and to the method for
making said nonwoven fabric.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] Nonwoven fabrics have wide utility for use in both disposable and reusable applications,
such as, e.g., aprons, towels, and wipes. There is continuing interest in producing
such nonwoven fabrics having a combination of strength, and/or absorbency, and/or
durability, and in manufacturing such fabrics by simple and efficient methods.
[0003] Highly entangled fiber fabrics has been long known in the art.. Such fabrics rely
primarily on interfiber frictional engagement for strength and integrity, and are
expensive to produce. It is also known to utilize an extraneous binder with loosely
entangled fibers, but this can lead to undesirable stiffness in the fabric, and the
introduction of binder into the interfiber spaces reduces the absorbency of the fabrics.
The problems associated with the formation of entangled fiber fabrics using certain
synthetic fibers, such as, polyester, are particularly acute, since such fibers (due
to their hydrophobic nature) are difficult to entangle, resulting in a loss of the
number of frictional bonds, and subsequently, a weak fabric. A method and apparatus
employed in forming an entangled nonwoven fabric of a variety of different fibers
is disclosed in detail in Evans U.S. Patent No. 3,485,706.
[0004] Prior to Applicant's invention it has been known how to produce thermal bonded nonwoven
fabrics from conjugate thermoplastic fibers by carding or air-laying a web consisting
of a loose assemblage of conjugate fibers and thereafter passing the web through an
oven, where at least one component of the conjugate fiber is melted and fused to adjacent
fibers. Fabrics formed in this manner are described in detail in Davies U.S. Patent
No. 3,511,747 and Davies et al. U.S. Patent No. 3,595,731. Conjugate fiber fabrics
are also set forth in U.S.S.N. 383,260 and 382,731 filed June 2, 1982. Fabrics formed
of bicomponent,.or heterofil, fibers are typically more expensive than fabrics formed
of single component, or homofil, fibers. Moreover, very high strength thermal bonded
fabrics lack the softness or hand of entangled fabrics.
[0005] Evans U.S. Patent No. 3,485,706 also discloses formation of an entangled fiber fabric
formed of conjugate fibers. However, in accordance with the teachings of the Evans
patent, such fabrics are comprised entirely of conjugate fibers, and the conjugate
fibers are shrunk and relatively highly crimped, so as to give the resulting fabric
elasticity. Fabrics formed of conjugate fibers in accordance with the Evans patent
are retained in the entangled configuration solely by frictional engagement between
the fibers, and there is no teaching or suggestion of melting any portion of the conjugate
fibers to achieve a thermoplastic fusion or thermal bonding effect.
[0006] One of the common problems associated with entangled fiber fabrics is fiber breakage,
or linting, at the surface(s) of the fabric. This phenomenon, when aggravated, makes
such fabrics unsuitable for use as a wound dressing, or the like, because the broken
fibers may adhere to and accumulate in the wound. In order to provide entangled fiber
fabrics with increased strength, and to reduce fiber breakage and linting, it has
been known to treat entangled fiber fabrics with a binder. However, many binders in
common use today are objectional from a medical and surgical standpoint, and thus
the problem remains.
[0007] The diaper facing material on the Moony diaper manufactured by Unicharm in Japan
comprising a very lightly entangled blend of rayon and polyester fibers and about
5% conjugated fibers having a polypropylene core and polyethylene sheath. The fabric
is very light weight, has little strength, and exhibits no fused entangled network
or superstructure.
[0008] It can be appreciated that an entangled fabric having the strength, resistance to
wet collapse, and launderability imparted to the fabric by the combination of fusible
fibers and the like entanglement process would be a welcome addition to the art.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0009] The fabric of the invention is a nonwoven, thermally bonded entangled fabric comprising
at least 10 percent conjugate fibers having an exposed surface component with a lower
melting point than any other portion of the conjugate fibers. The fabric may also
comprise other fibers, including natural fibers, such as cotton, or synthetic fibers,
such as rayon, polyester or other polyolefins.
[0010] The nonwoven fabrics of the invention are produced by a process which comprises:
(a) providing a loose array of fibers comprising conjugate fibers having an exposed
lower melting point component and possibly other fibers;
(b) entangling the fibers of the loose array using a process similar to that described
in Evans U.S. Patent No. 3,485,706;
(c) subjecting said fibers to a temperature sufficient to melt the lower melting point
component of said conjugate fibers while maintaining the fibers under minimal compression;
and
(d) cooling said fibers to resolidify the lower melting point component of said conjugate
fibers, to thereby bond said conjugate fibers to each other or possibly to other fibers
at the fiber intersections, to create a fused, entangled network of fibers.
[0011] While it is encompassed within the present invention to make a fabric of solely entangled
conjugate fibers, a nonwoven fabric formed in accordance with the instant invention
will in its preferred embodiment be a generally homogeneous fabric comprising at least
10 percent conjugate fibers interspersed throughout. The remainder of said fabric
may comprise fibers of cotton, rayon, nylon or polyolefin fibers, such as polyester
fibers, or other conventional fibers having sufficient length so they will not wash
out during the entanglement process. The conjugate fibers may be bicomponent fibers
in which at least a portion of the outer surface has a lower melting temperature than
the other component of the fiber.
[0012] The fabric derives strength by the entanglement process, which arranges the fibers
and in particular the conjugate fibers in an entangled network. Further strength is
imparted by heating of the fibers to soften or melt the low melting point component
of the conjugate fiber to create adhesion bonds with adjacent conjugate fibers or
other fibers in the web. When heated the low melting point component of the conjugate
fibers may flow to the fiber intersections and points of tangency of the fibers, and
upon solidification, bridge and join adjacent fibers, forming inclusion bonds to supplement
the interfiber frictional engagement resulting from the entanglement process. The
high melting point components of the conjugate fibers retain their fiber integrity,
and together with the fibers bonded thereto create a fused entangled fiber network
which imparts added strength to the fabric, yielding a launderable fabric with enhanced
resistance to wet collapse.
[0013] Thus, a fabric made in accordance with the present invention results in a strong
fabric which is less expensive to produce and exhibits better abrasion resistance
than solely entangled fabrics. Due to the strength imparted to the fabric by the entangling
of the fibers, the fabrics exhibit better softness and hand than thermal bonded fabrics
with comparable strength. In addition, the fabrics of the present invention do not
require the addition of an adhesive binder which can reduce absorbency as well as
desirability for medical and surgical use. By using a bicomponent fiber which retains
its integrity during the fabric forming process, the fabric is strengthened and shows
increaseá resistance to wet collapse, in addition to its other attributes. Though
the fabrics formed in accordance with the present invention require no additive binder,
they possess surface characteristics wherein little fiber breakage and linting takes
place, making such fabrics suitable for medical and surgical use, such as for wound
dressings. Such fabrics also have improved wash durability.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0014]
Figure 1 is a schematic side elevation of an apparatus suitable for carrying out the
method of the invention;
Figure 2 is an enlarged illustration of an entangled fabric incorporating conjugate
fibers; and
Figure 3 is a view taken along line 3-3 of Figure 2.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0015] The fabric of the present invention comprises at least 10 percent conjugate fibers.
As used in this application, the term conjugate fibers includes thermoplastic fibers
having at least two components of differing melting points. The fabric is entangled
to provide interfiber frictional bonds and then heated to provide adhesion and/or
inclusion bonding at plural fiber intersections. By fiber intersections, the present
application intends to include not only points where fibers criss-cross one another,
but also points of fiber tangency.
[0016] Other fibers which may be included in the fabrics of the present invention include
cotton, nylon, rayon and polyolefins. These fibers are normally from about 1/4 inch
to 2 inches or longer in length, but this is intended to be exemplary only, since
other fiber lengths can be employed so long as the fibers do not wash out during the
entanglement process. During the heating process, the low melting point component
of the conjugate fiber may melt and flow about said other fibers, creating inclusion
bonds.
[0017] In a preferred embodiment, the nonwoven fabric of the invention is made from a homogeneous
blend of polyester fibers and polyester/polyethylene conjugate fibers.
[0018] The various conjugate fibers that may be used include bicomponent fibers wherein
the fiber components are arranged in side-by-side relationship. However, it is preferred
to employ sheath/core bicomponent fibers, and even more preferred to employ sheath/core
bicomponent fibers with polyethylene as the sheath and the polyester as the core.
Either eccentric or concentric sheath/core fibers can be employed. The fibers will
usually have a denier within the range of from about 1 to about 6, and are in excess
of about 1/4 inch in length, up to about 3 or 4 inches long.
[0019] Preferably, the conjugate fibers employ high density polyethylene, that is, linear
polyethylene that has a density of at least about 0.94, and a Melt Index ("M.I.")
by ASTM D-1238(E) (190°C, 2160 gms.) of greater than 1, preferably greater than about
10, and more, most preferably from about 20 to about 50. Usually, the fibers .will
be composed of about 40 to 60 weight percent, and preferably 45 to 55 weight percent,
polyester, the remainder being polyethylene. The polyester fiber, which makes up a
large percentage of the fabric to be formed in accordance with a preferred embodiment
of the invention, has a melting temperature above that of the polyethylene sheath
so that the polyester is not melted during the thermal bonding step.
[0020] Other conjugate fibers having utility in the present invention are heterofil medium
tenacity fibers. Such- fibers, which are available from ICI Fibers, Harrogate, North
Yorkshire, England, under product codes 3.3/100/V303, 3.3/50/V303, 6.7/50/V302, 13/65/V302,
and 13/100/V302 include sheath/core fibers wherein the sheath is'a nylon 6 material
and the core is a higher melting point nylon 66 material. Such fibers are particularly
useful in combination with polyester base fibers, and illustratively, the layer of
heterofil fibers will comprise at least about 10 percent by weight of the overall
weight of the entangled fabric. Other medium tenacity heterofil fibers available from
ICI Fibers for use in the present invention will include polyester fibers sold under
product codes 3.3/50/V544 and 3.3/90/V544. Other suitable sheath/core fibers include
fibers having polyethylene or polyethylene terephthalate as a core material and an
isophthalic copolymer as the sheath material.
[0021] Other examples of polymer pairs suitable for use in the conjugate fibers of the fabrics
of the present invention are copolyester/polyester, nylon/polypropylene, poly- propylene/polyester,
and nylon 6/polypropylene. The conjugate fibers made from these polymer pairs may
comprise side-by-side or sheath/core polymer configurations.
[0022] The fabrics of the invention are produced by first forming a fibrous web comprising
a loose array of fibers and conjugate fibers, as by carding, air-laying, or the like.
It is preferred to employ a card, or a dual rotor such as is shown by Ruffo et al
in U.S. Patent No. 3,768,118, as the web forming device, although other web forming
apparatus can be employed if desired. The exact weight of the fibrous web has not
been found to be narrowly critical. In a preferred embodiment the major portion of
the homogeneous fabric made in accordance with the present invention is made up of
the relatively less expensive polyester fiber and the balance is conjugate fiber.
The percent by weight of the conjugate fibers may be as low as from about 10 percent
to about 20 percent; however, if additional increased strength is desired the percentage
of the relatively more expensive conjugate fibers can be increased up to about 100
percent by weight. The mechanism disclosed in the Ruffo et al patent is an air-laying
apparatus which receives fibers from cards and is capable of producing a web which
can be made up of 100 percent conjugate fibers or a blend of conjugate fibers and
other fibers in whatever proportion desired. The conjugate fibers may be concentrated
at one or both of the major surfaces of the fabric in accordance with the teachings
of the Ruffo et al patent.
[0023] Figure 1 shows one arrangement of apparatus that can be used to produce the fabrics
of the invention. A homogeneous web 8 of loose conjugate and other fibers is produced
by, e.g., a dual rotor. This composite web 8, comprising a loose array of conjugate
fibers, e.g., polyester/polyethylene bicomponent fibers and other fibers, e.g., polyester
fibers is supported on a liquid pervious support member such as an endless woven belt
10, which carries the web through an entangling mechanism 12 where a series of high
pressure, fine, essentially columnar jets of water 14 impact the web, entangling the
fibers. The high pressure water is supplied from manifold 16. The jets are arranged
in rows disposed transversely across the path of travel of the belt 10. Preferably,
there is a vacuum means 18 pulling a vacuum, e.g, of up to 5 to 10 inches of mercury,
beneath the belt 10.
[0024] Evans, in U.S. Patent No. 3,485,706, describes a process and apparatus for rearranging/entangling
fibrous webs by carrying such webs on a woven belt under a series of high pressure,
fine, columnar jets of liquid. Apparatus of the general type disclosed by Evans can
be used in the process of this invention, although typically the degree of entanglement
contemplated by this invention is much less than that generally preferred by Evans.
[0025] The entangled fiber web is then conveyed by suitable mechanisms including belts 20,
22 to a heating means such as a forced air oven 24. In the oven 24, the web is subjected
to an elevated temperature to melt at least part of the low melting point component
(e.g., polyethylene) of the conjugate fibers, which will form adhesion and inclusion
bonds at points of fiber-to-fiber contact, and/or at points of adjacent fiber tangency
upon cooling and resolidification. As previously mentioned, the temperature in the
heating zone is sufficiently high to melt at least part of the low melting component
of the conjugate fibers, but insufficient to melt the higher melting point component
(e.g., polyester) of the conjugate fibers, thus maintaining the fibrous form of the
conjugate fibers in the fabric. The temperature is also insufficient to melt the base
fibers which constitute the major portion of the web.
[0026] The web is preferably thermal bonded under conditions of zero pressure, or very light
pressure, so that the web is not significantly crushed or compacted during the thermal
bonding step. The exact temperatures employed in the thermal bonding step will vary,
depending upon the weight and bulk density of the web, and upon the dwell time employed
in the heated zone. For instance, bonding temperatures within the range from about
130° to about 180°C, have been found satisfactory for entangled webs comprised of
a blend of polyester fibers and polyethylene/ polyester sheath/core conjugate fibers
of-the type described above. Dwell times in the bonding zone will usually vary from
about 2 seconds to about 1 minute, and more normally will be from about 3 to about
10 seconds. The important factor in selecting the heating conditions for optimum bonding
is to heat the low melting point component to at least its melting point, but not
to such a temperature that the higher melting point component of the other fibers
could melt. Thus, very high temperatures can be used with short exposure times, in
order to achieve high speed operation.
[0027] In the thermal bonding step, the low melting point component of the conjugate fiber
may be caused to flow to fiber intersections and to points of fiber tangency or adjacency,
to entraps other fibers in a thermoplastic mass to form inclusion bonds. The low melting
point component also adheres to like material on the remaining conjugate fibers and
to the other fibers in the web to bond such fibers to one another. Upon cooling, the
welds of the fused low melting point component, e.g., polyethylene, solidify and excellent
fiber-to-fiber bonds are thereby formed. Simple exposure to ambient air will ordinarily
provide adequate cooling. When polyester fibers are utilized as the other fibers,
and polyethylene/polyester bicomponent fibers are utilized as the conjugate fibers,
and the blended web is subjected to heating conditions which substantially completely
melt the polyethylene component of the conjugate fibers while leaving the polyester
component thereof intact, the resulting entangled fiber fabric consists substantially
completely of polyester fibers and remaining polyester cores that are retained in
the entangled configuration by the cooperative action of interfiber frictional engagement
and thermal polyethylene bonds.
[0028] The thermal bonding step can be carried out by through-air bonding, as illustrated
in Figure 1 by the oven, or by other means such as infrared heating or other types
of radiant heating. Through-air bonding is accomplished by carrying the web on a porous
conveyor belt through a zone where hot air is forced through the web. It can be carried
through a heated zone between two porous screens or belts, or it can be carried around
a rotating drum having a porous surface which is equipped to suck hot air through
the web as it is passing around the drum. The exact method of effecting the heating
has not been found to be narrowly critical. If desired, the thermal bonding step can
be performed by passing the web between heated restraining belts, which apply moderate
pressure, or between heated embossing or calendering rolls, which apply heavier pressure.
With these latter methods, some compaction and densification of the web takes place.
However, the application of pressure increases the number of fiber contact points
and thermal bonds.
[0029] After thermal bonding and cooling to solidify the bonds, the fabric of the invention
is collected, as on a conventional wind-up mechanism 25.
[0030] Referring now to Figures 2 and 3, there is illustrated in magnified form the construction
of one nonwoven fabric made in accordance with the instant invention. As previously
mentioned, the entangling mechanism acts to reform the loose array of fibers in the
web 8 into an entangled fiber network.
[0031] Strong frictional bonds between the fibers will be obtained due to entanglement and
strong thermal bonds are obtained where the conjugate fibers 26 are thermally joined
to one another or to the other fibers in the web by adhesion bonds 28, and joined
to other fibers 30 in the web by inclusion bonds 32. As shown at 32, inclusion bonds
are formed as the low melting point component after conjugate fiber 26 meets and flows
around the other fibers of the web. As shown at 34, the high melting point component
of the conjugate fibers remain intact after thermal bonding. Since the fabric obtains
strength from a combination of entanglement and thermobonding, it has better combination
of strength and softness or hand than a fabric formed by thermobonding alone, yet
possesses the strength, abrasion resistance and resistance to wet collapse of a fabric
made by thermal bonding. In addition, the adhesion bonds, inclusion bonds, and even
areas of migration and accumulation of the low melting point component of the conjugate
fibers provide increased resistance to fabric pull out or disentangling, displayed
in increased fabric strengths and low surface linting of the fibers.
[0032] As shown in Figure 3, the entangling process results in a z-direction movement of
the fibers, and generally creates a large number of intersections where the conjugate
and other fibers are in contact. When the entangled web is heated, the low melting
point component of the conjugate fibers 26 form adhesion bonds 28, and possibly inclusion
thermal bonds 32 at the intersection and points of tangency of the conjugate fibers
with other conjugate fibers and with the base fibers. This thermal bonding creates
a fused entangled fiber network which greatly increases the strength of the fabric,
and gives improved abrasion resistance and resistance to wet collapse.
[0033] The increased strength of the fabrics of the present invention attributable to thermal
bonding may be seen in the following example. Carded webs of 20% CHISSO ES fibers
having a polypropylene core and polyethylene sheath, and 80% polypropylene fibers
were entangled, dried, and thermal bonded on steam cans at 310F. Sample 14628-1 was
dried but not thermal bonded. Sample 146280-2 was dried and thermal bonded on-line
by passing the web about a stack of steam cans. Sample 146280-3 was dried and thermal
bonded by passing the web, disposed between two beets, about a stack of steam cans.
A comparison of fabric properties is set out below.

[0034] The increased strength in terms of both launderability and abrasion resistance, and
the resistance to wet collapse of the fabrics according to this invention are achieved
without the sacrifice to absorbency shown by fabrics combining loosely entangled fibers
and, e.g., latex binder which fills the interfiber spaces. When binder material fills
the interfiber spaces, it decreases absorbent capacity and disrupts the capillary
network of the fabric. The following example illustrates the enhanced absorbent characteristics
of the fabrics of the present invention as compared with loosely entangled fabrics
with latex binder. Samples A, B, and C were made with 1 1/8 inch length, 1.5 denier
AVTEX SN 1913 rayon and 1.5 inch length, 3.0 denier BICO 1050 polyethylene/polyester
sheath/core conjugate fibers made by American Enka. 2.0 oz./yd.
2 webs were entangled on a 5710 Duotex belt made by Appleton Wire. The web and belt
were passed under columnar jets of water from a strip of orifice of 0.007 inch diameter,
disposed at 30/inch. The samples underwent 2 passes under the strips at 100 psi water
pressure, 3 passes at 300 psi, 3 passes at 500 psi and then 10 passes at 1000 psi.
The samples were then thermobonded in an oven at 300°
F for 20 seconds under no pressure. Sample D was made from a 2.0 oz./yd.
2 web of 1 1/8 inch, 1.5 denier AVTE
X SN 1913 rayon. The web was entangled on the same belt and with the same orifice strips
as samples A, B, and C, but with 3 passes at 100 psi, 3 passes at 150 psi, and 24
passes at 600 psi. The web was then saturation bonded with an acrylic binder solution
and dried, to produce a ratio of 872 gms of fiber to 55 gms of binder in the final
fabric. The samples were tested for absorbent capacity using an SAC test, take-up
rate using an ATS test, and residue (or substrate surface dry ability) and launderability
using the test methods described below.
[0035] The Gravimetric Absorbency Tester (GAT) described in U.S. 4,357,827 which was issued
November 9, 1982, and which is incorporated herein by reference, is used to determine
the Saturated Absorbency Capacity (SAC) and the Apparent Take-up Speed (ATS).
[0036] The GAT is set for a positive hydrostatic head by raising the base plate 3mm above
the zero hydrostatic head position. A sample is die cut to 10 cm. in diameter, weighed
on an analytical balance to the
'nearest 0.001 gram, and is affixed to the sample holder of the GAT. The sample holder
is placed on the point source base plate and a 100 gram weight is imposed on top of
the sample holder. This weight plus the weight of the sample holder provides a pressure
of 0.05 psi on the test specimen. The chart speed is set at 3 cm/min. The balance
is tared. The test is started and allowed to proceed until the balance readout stabilizes.
The maximum weight achieved which represents the maximum amount of fluid absorbed
by the test specimen is recorded.
[0037] The SAC is determined by dividing the maximum amount of fluid absorbed by the specimen
(balance readout) by the dry weight of the test specimen. The results are expressed
as grams of fluid absorbed per gram of fabric.
[0038] The 25% saturation point is determined by multiplying the balance readout by .25
and the 75% saturation point by multiplying by .75. On the GAT chart the 25% and 75%
saturation points are connected by a straight line. The slope of this line is designated
by the ATS with the results expressed as grams of fluid absorbed per gram of test
specimen per sec. and is a measurement of the take up rate or rate at which the test
specimen takes up fluid.
[0039] Accelerated wash tests are done using a Launder-O-Meter unit supplied by Atlas Electric
Devices Co. of Chicago, Ill. Test specimens are laundered under specified conditions
of temperature, liquid level, soap concentration and abrasive action so that launderability
is evaluated in a conveniently short time.
[0040] The Launder-O-Meter is set for a bath temperature of 160°F and run until a stabilized
temperature is reached. The specimen to be tested is cut to a size of 2 inches by
6 inches and placed in a container along with a standard AATCC 9.2% soap solution
obtained by AATCC Research Triangle Park, North Carolina and fifty 1/4" diameter steel
balls. The container is placed in the basket of the Launder-O-Meter and positioned
in the preheater/storage until the temperature reaches 120°F. After preheating, the
basket is placed on the rotor of the Launder-O-Meter, the unit started, and the time
cycle set for 60 minutes. At the completion of the cycle the specimen is removed and
inspected. Failure of the specimen is noted by visual inspection for any holes. If
the specimen passes, it is recycled by the above procedure. This process continues
until the specimen fails or until the test is terminated. The wash durability test
results are reported as the number of hours of successful wash or the number of hours
to wash failure.
[0041] The residue test measures wicking efficiency and yields an indication of the ability
of the test specimen to wipe surfaces dry. To perform this test, a glass plate is
placed on an analytical balance and the balance tared. From the previously conducted
SAC the 50% SAC level is calculated and this amount of liquid is carefully dispensed
onto the glass plate so as to cause it to puddle in the center of the plate. A test
specimen is die cut in a 10 c.m. diameter and carefully placed on the plate over the
puddle of liquid. Twenty seconds are allowed for the specimen to reach an equilibrium
absorption after which the test specimen is removed from the glass plate and the weight
of the liquid which remains on the plate is read directly from the balance. This weight
of liquid is the residue and is reported in grams of liquid.

The fabrics of the present invention exhibited greater absorbent capacity and take-up
rate than sample
D. The fabrics of the present invention also showed increasing absorbent capacity and
take-up as the percentage of ENKA conjugate fibers were increased from 10 percent
to 20 percent to 33 percent. The fabrics of the present invention exhibited good surface
drying ability, though the surface drying ability declined with increasing percentage
of the non-absorbent conjugate fibers or decrease in percentage rayon. Surface drying
ability may be improved by treating the fabric with a surfactant. Samples A and D
showed comparable durability.
[0042] Samples of the diaper facing material on the Unicharm Moony diaper were also subjected
to the Launder-O-Meter test described above, however the time cycle was set for 20
minutes. Upon inspection after 20 minutes the fabric sample was substancially disintegrated.
[0043] The fabrics of the present invention may be entangled on a variety of supporting
belts to achieve a broad range of fiber structures and fabric appearances, as is known
in the art. For instance, the fabrics may appear apertured or unapertured and may
have localized tufts or nubs of entangling, or elongated ribs of entangled fibers
extending across the fabric.
[0044] The foregoing description and drawings are illustrative but are not to be taken as
limiting. Other variations and modifications are possible without departing from the
spirit and scope of the present invention.
1. A entangled nonwoven fabric comprising at least 10 percent conjugate fibers, said
fabric having a combination of both strength wash durability absorbency and resistance
to wet.collapse, said fabric comprising an entangled, fused network of conjugate fibers
comprising an exposed low melting point component, and a higher melting point component,
said conjugate fibers having been heated to a temperature to melt said low melting
point components, whereby said conjugate fibers are thermal bonded to yield a fabric
with increased strength, resistance to wet collapse and launderability.
2. A fabric as in Claim 1, comprising conjugate fibers and other fibers, wherein said
conjugate fibers are thermal bonded to the other fibers of the web.
3. A fabric as in Claim 1 or 2, wherein said low melting point component of said conjugate
fibers form inclusion bonds with said other fibers at the intersections of said conjugate
fibers and other fibers.
4. A fabric as set forth in Claim 3 in which the conjugate fibers comprise a core
component and a sheath component, in which the sheath component is a low melting point
component.
5. A fabric as set forth in Claim 3 in which the components of the conjugate fibers
are disposed in side-by-side relationship.
6. A fabric as set forth in Claims 2, 3, 4, or 5 in which the lower melting point
component is polyethylene.
7. A fabric as set forth in Claim 6 comprising a polyester component.
8. A fabric as set forth in Claim 1 in which the fabric is comprised of a homogeneous
blend of said conjugate fibers and other fibers.
9. A fabric as set forth in Claim 1 or 2 comprising at least 20 percent conjugate
fibers.
10. A fabric as set forth in Claim 1 or 2 comprising at least 33 percent conjugate
fibers.
11. A fabric as set forth in Claim 1 in which the other fibers are polyolefins.
12. A fabric as set forth in Claim 10 in which the other fiber is polyester.
13. A fabric as set forth in Claim 1 in which the other fibers are cotton.
14. A fabric as set forth in Claim 1 in which the other fibers are rayon.
15. A method of forming a nonwoven fabric comprising the steps of: providing a web
comprising conjugate fibers having an exposed low melting point component and a higher
melting point component: passing essentially columnar jets of fluid under pressure
through said web to entangle said fibers; and heating said web to thermal bond said
low melting point components of said conjugate fibers at fiber intersections to increase
the strength of the fabric.
16. A method as in Claim 15 wherein said web comprises conjugate fibers and other
fibes, and said conjugate fibers are thermal bonded to the other fibers of the web
at fiber intersections.
17. A method as in Claim 15 or 16 wherein said low melting point component of said
conjugate fibers is caused to flow, to form inclusion bonds with said other fibers
at the intersections of said conjugate fibers and other fibers.
18. A method as set forth in Claim 15 in which the conjugate fibers and other fibers
are blended into a homogeneous web.
19. A method as set forth in Claim 15 in which said heating step is performed by subjecting
said web to hot air.
20. A method as set forth in Claim 15 in which said heating step is performed by subjecting
said web to radiant heating.