"OPTIC CORRELATOR PARTICULARLY FOR USE IN REAL TIME TV DISPLAY PROCESSING SYSTEMS
TO ACQUIRE THE COORDINATES OF OBJECTS HAVING ANY SHAPES AND SIZES"
[0001] This invention relates to an optic correlator particularly for use in real time TV
display processing systems to acquire the coordinates of objects having any shapes
and sizes. As is known, the cross correlation algorithm of images having given shapes
can be utilized to recognize either stationary or moving objects. Further details
on this are to be found in Italian Patent Application No. 21458 A/83 by Fondazione
Pro Juventute Don Carlo Gnocchi having for its designated inventors Antonio Pedotti
and Giancarlo Ferrigno, and in Italian Patent Application No. 23733 A/83, also by
Fondazione Pro Juventute Don Carlo Gnocchi and having the same designated inventors.
[0002] In both of the cited Italian Patent Applications, the correlator was formed from
electronic components the number whereof was of necessity to increase as the size
of the objects to be recognized increased. This involved, in addition to a more complex
construction, a considerable increase in cost.
[0003] Accordingly, it is an object of this invention to provide a correlator, particularly
for use in real time TV display proceesing systems to acquire the coordinates of objects
having a known shape, which is constructionally simple and can be readily adapted,
without involving any increased constructional complexity thereof, for recognition
of objects having any sizes.
[0004] Another object of this invention is to provide a correlator, for the above-specified
application, which can operate at an extremely high processing rate.
[0005] It is a further object of this invention to provide a correlator, which can recognize
objects of any shapes.
[0006] These and other objects, such as will be apparent hereinafter, are achieved by a
correlator of the optical type, particularly for use in real time TV display processing
systems, and adapted for the acquisition of coordiantes of known shape objects, according
to the characterizing portion of Claim 1.
[0007] Further features of the correlator of this invention are pointed out in the subclaims.
[0008] Still more features and advantages of the optic correlator particularly for use in
real time TV display processing systems to acquire coordinates of known shape objects,
will be apparent from the following detailed description of a presently preferred
embodiment thereof, as illustrated by way of example and not of limitation in the
accompanying drawings, where:
Figure 1 illustrates diagramatically the operation of an incoherent light optic correlator
of a known type;
Figures 2 and 3 show arrangement diagrams and operation diagrams of the correlator
according to this invention; and
Figure 4 it a general block diagram illustrating one possible way of interconnecting
the optic correlator of this invention within a real time TV display processing system
for the acquisition of coordinates of objects having any shapes and sizes; and
Fig. 5 shows a further configuration when the objects to be detected are sufficiently
far from the subject system.
[0009] Making now specific reference to Figure 1, there is shown a constitutive and operation
diagram for a correlator of a known type. More precisely, the diagram of Figure 1
relates to an incoherent light device capable of correlating cross fashion two transparencies
T
1, T
2. In Figure 1, S denotes a source of incoherent extended light, L a lens, f the focal
length, F the focal plane, and Z
o the distance between the two transparencies .
[0010] Assuming diffration to be negligible, or details of T
1 and T
2 not close to.the wavelength of the light from S, said mounting effects the cross correlation
between T
1 and
T2.
[0011] More precisely, on each point P,Q on the focal plane there impinge the light rays
from any directions. Let us take into particular consideration the direction of director
cosines p and q. The ray passing through the point (x,y) of T
1 meets T
2 at (x+pz
o, y + qz
o) where, as mentioned, z is the distance between T
1 and T
2. The strength of the ray, after going through the transparencies is:
[0012] 
[0013] All the rays from this direction converge into the point (P,Q) having coordinates
P=pf and Q=qf of the focal plane F
o Since the strengths add together at this point, the overall strength at P,Q is:

[0014] In other words, the mounting or arrangement effects a real cross correlation. The
only problem which arises in this case is that the transparency T
2 which represents the reference shape can only assume positive values. The main object
of this invention is, in essence, that of solving the latter problem in order to apply
the optic correlator to recognition of images in a system of the type described in
the above-mentioned Italian Patent Applications.
[0015] The solution to such a problem is set forth in Figure 2.
[0016] In that figure, S' denotes the display to be processed, L' the object lens, D a device
(prism, semireflecting mirror, crystal of a particular type, and so forth) for splitting
the image which is projected onto two glazed glasses V
I and V
2. In particular V
1 and V
2 have in such a case the functions of the transparency T
1 (they may also be omitted in practice). The splitting element may be practically
eliminated for displays shot from a long distance by using two object lenses as in
Figure 5, because the offset due to distance between the two object lenses becomes
negligible as the distance D increases). Two mountings of the type of Figure 1 are
placed behind V
1 and V
2, on the focal plane whereof are placed two image detectors or sensors, for example
of the CCD or tube types. On each element of the sensors there is generated a charge
proportional to the cross-correlation of T
i2 (i = 1,2) with S'. Naturally, T
12 and T
22 will only have positive values. In the assumption of perfect alignment of the two
images on the sensors, the limitation on the sign may be overcome.
[0017] In fact, the reference function C (X,Y) is factorized into two:

[0018] where C denotes a function equal to C where this is positive or nil and nil where
this is negative. C is a function equal to C where this is negative and nil where
this is positive or nil. The transparency T
12 is thus "modulated" by the function C
+, whilst the T
22 is modulated by the function|C
-|. The outputs from the two sensors 1 and 2 are then combined as follows (see Figure
3)(pixel by pixel):

[0019] It will be demonstrated herein below how this coincides with having at the output
(Q
out) the correlation between the display S' and the reference function C. The output
charge Q is proportional to the intensity I on the individual pixel (Q=KI).

[0020] The output of the combination of Figure 3 is, therefore, directly the cross correlation
between the display S' and the reference shape C. In particular the partial cross
correlation functions are in the form of light intensity modulation and converted
into electric signals (e.g. charges) through two photoelectric sensors (e.g. of the
CCD or tube TV camera types). The electric information is combined as in Figure 3,
point by point, or from each element of the scanning matrix 1 there is subtracted
the value of the corresponding element of the matrix 2.
[0021] Thus the end cross correlation actual funotion may be calculated.
[0022] The matrix points may also be scanned by rows or lines (TV raster type).
[0023] By operating as illustrated in the aforementioned Italian Patent Applications, one
can arrive at recognizing objects of any shapes and sizes. That recognition is effected
by means of an extremely simple system of the optical type and including a minimum
of components and extremely economical. In particular by using for T
12 and T
22 transparencies adapted to be "modulated" such as liquid crystal matrices, it becomes
possible to adaptively vary, as outlined in the aforementioned Italian Patent Application
No. 23733 A/83, the reference function C with consequent adaptivity of the recognition.
[0024] Finally, in Figure 4, there is shown a possible block diagram wherein the optic correlator
of this invention may be used for recognition in a real time TV display processing
system for acquisition of coordinates of objects of any known shapes and sizes. That
block will be no further discussed because already illustrated extensively in the
two cited Italian patent applications.
[0025] It may be appreciated from the foregoing that the invention fully achieves its objects.
In particular, an optic correlator has been provided having a very high processing
rate, being very simple construction- wise, and capable of recognizing objects of
any shapes and sizes. The optic correlator of this invention operates on an incoherent
extended light source, and in particular, dodges the basic problem of the known incoherent
optic correlator consisting of the transparency representing the reference shape only
taking positive values. Thus, the correlator of this invention is optimally adapted
to replace the complex electronic correlator employed in the system of the cited Italian
patent applications.
[0026] While the invention has been illustrated in connection with a particular embodiment
thereof, it is susceptible to many modifications and variations without departing
from the purview of the inventive concept.
1. An optic correlator, particularly for use in real time TV display processing systems
to acquire coordinates of objects having any shapes and sizes, characterized in that
it comprises an object lens means (L') for shooting the image of a display to be processed,
said display including at least one object of any shape and size, a means (D) adapted
to split the image shot by said object lens means, and a pair of split image support
elements (V1,V2), each to receive a respective split image thereon from said image splitting means
(D), and behind each image support element in said pair, a respective assembly comprising
a respective transparency means (T12,T22), respective lens (L",Z"'), and respective sensor (S1,S2), the outputs from said two sensors (S1,S2) being supplied to electronic combinatory means adapted to provide the differences
thereof.
2. An optic correlator according to Claim 1, characterized in that each of said sensors
(S1,S2) comprises a plurality of elements effective to generate a potential electric charge
or other electrical quantity proportional to the cross correlation between said respective
means and said display.
3. An optic correlator according to Claim 1, characterized in that said electronic
combinatory means is adapted to combine pixel by pixel the outputs from said two sensors
(S1,S2) to supply as the resulting output the correlation between said display and the reference
function.
4. An optic correlator according to Claim 1, characterized in that said transparency
means (T12,T22) comprises a transparency of the type adapted to be modulated.
5. An optic correlator according to Claim 3, characterized in that said transparency
means (T12,T22) comprises liquid crystal matrices.
6. An optic correlator according to Claim 1, characterized in that said image splitting
device (D) comprises a prism, semireflecting mirror and/or the like.
7. An optic correlator according to Claim 1, characterized in that said image support
elements (V1,V2) comprise glazed glasses.
8. An optic correlator according to Claim 1, characterized in that said sensors (S1,S2) are of the CCD type.
9. An optic correlator according to Claim 1, characterized in that said sensors (S1,S2) are of the tube type, said sensors being each arranged on the respective focal plane
of said lenses (L",L"' ).