[0001] THIS INVENTION relates to the sinking of shafts in the earths crust. Such shafts
may be for the purpose of underground mining operations or any other purposes. In
addition such shafts may be vertical or inclined and of varying cross-sections and
cross-sectional areas. It is known to provide production shafts in mining operations
which can have a cross-sectional area of approximately 35 square metres and depth
of 900 metres or greater.
[0002] According to conventional procedures the shaft sinking involves the following steps:-
(a) boring;
(b) firing;
(c) bogging;
(d) support;
(e) furnishing.
[0003] Boring involves the drilling of holes for accommodating explosives in the bottom
of the shafts according to a set pattern. In a typical pattern there are 52 38 mm
diameter holes in a pattern comprising 6 central pyramid cut holes on a 1.83 metre
diameter circle, 10 cut hole easers around a 3.05 metre to 3.5 metre circle, 15 (sometimes
18) crop easer holes on a 4.57 to 5.03 metre circle and 21 cropper holes on a 6.4
metre circle. The holes are usually drilled to a vertical depth of between 1.37 and
1.52 metres.
[0004] Firing consist of detonating the individual explosive charges in the above-mentioned
pattern of holes in a predetermined sequence in order that a second free face is created
initially near the centre of the face of the shaft and subsequently over the whole
cross-sectional area of the shaft on firing the subsequent charges in the pattern.
It can be expected that a break of 1.22 metres depth will represent 125 tonnes of
rock material in a shaft of the form described above using the above hole pattern.
[0005] Bogging consists of extracting the broken rock material from the shaft using a bucket
and hoist which raises the material to the surface.
[0006] The support step involves lining the shaft to prevent rock falls.
[0007] The furnishing step comprises partitioning the shaft with horizontal frames at regular
intervals to divide the shaft into compartments to accommodate man cages and counterweights,
ore and waste skips, ladder ways and service conduits. The above method of sinking
shafts suffers from the principal disadvantage of being very costly. For example recently
at the Golden Grove Mining property in Western Australia a 4.6 metre diameter concrete
lined shaft was sunk to a depth of 370 metres the total cost of $4 million Australian
Dollars.
[0008] The above method of sinking shafts has two principle causes for the high cost in
shaft sinking with comprise:-
(a) the low power of machinery that can be located at the working face;
(b) the cyclic nature of the operation.
[0009] In relation to the power of the machines which can be used in a typical shaft, a
typical sinking drill which can be used in such an operation applies approximately
6 to 7 kW power to the cutting edges. In open cut mining machines are used which can
typically apply power of the order of 90 kW to the cutting edges. The power of the
machines available in shaft sinking limits the diameter of the hole which can be drilled
(typically to 38 mm) which in turn limits the amount of explosive
' which can be loaded into the hole resulting in a large number of holes being required
to accommodate the amount of explosive necessary to break the rock. It follows that
if the holes were of a larger diameter fewer holes would need to be drilled and less
expensive lower bulk strength explosives can be used.
[0010] The cyclic nature of the shaft sinking operation is unavoidable as there are certain
unproductive activities which must be executed in between the phases of the cycle.
These activities include:-
(a) moving equipment in and out of the shaft after clearing the shaft of rock material
and prior to firing the explosives respectively;
(b) waiting for blast fumes to clear from the shaft;
(c) generally cleaning the shaft face of the residual broken material between bogging
and boring to avoid the danger created by boring into the face and detonating an unexploded
charge from the previous firing.
[0011] It is desirable to make each phase of the cycle as long as possible but the controlling
factor is the depth of the round that can be fired. In horizontal headings and headings
which are inclined upwardly it is possible to achieve advances from 4.75 to 1.2 times
the heading diameter per round since the explosive charges are assisted by gravity.
In contrast when sinking shafts the explosives are operating against the force of
gravity and it seems that approximately 2.5 metres is the maximum depth of round that
can be fired even with shafts of large cross-sectional area. In practice the advance
per round is limited to about half this depth because of the desire to complete a
full bogging, boring and firing cycle in one shift with firing taking place at the
end of the shift to give blast fumes time to clear from the shaft before the next
shift starts work.
[0012] Recently it has been proposed to sink shafts using blind shaft boring machines. These
are similar to tunnel boring machines but operate vertically. The machine comprises
a large rotating circular cutting head faced with a plurality of conical cutting elements
which are faced with tungsten carbide. Each element rotates freely on the head and
are arranged over the face of the head to fully cover the entire shaft cross-section.
The body of the machine is wedged in the shaft by hydraulic means and other hydraulic
rams force the cutting head against the working face as the head is caused to rotate.
In some cases the cuttings from the machine are extracted by a suction unit.
[0013] Blind shaft boring machines of the above form apply high power to the working face
and operate continuously however they are reported to be extremely expensive to operate
in hard rock conditions. This is probably because of the high consumption of cutting
cones which is the experienced with raise boring machines which operate on the same
principle.
[0014] It would seem to be contrary to good practice to use expensive boring machines in
shaft sinking when cheap efficient explosives are available to effect a similar satisfactory
result.
[0015] It is an object of this invention to provide a method of shaft sinking with explosives
in which the cost of shaft sinking is reduced in relation to the conventional techniques
described above.
[0016] In one form the invention resides in a method of sinking shafts comprising excavating
a series of lifts throughout the length of the shaft wherein each lift is excavated
by drilling a pattern of blast holes for the full depth of the lift including boring
a large diameter hole, creating a chamber at the lower end of the large diameter hole,
blasting the walls of the chamber to deposit rock material into the chamber, extracting
at least a portion of the rock material created by the blast and repeating the blasting
and extraction step throughout the length of the lift wherein on the full volume of
the lift being blasted the remaining broken material is extracted.
[0017] According to a preferred feature of the invention sufficient rock material is extracted
between each blasting step to provide sufficient space for the rock material created
by the subsequent blast.
[0018] According to a further preferred feature of the invention said large diameter hole
is enlarged throughout its length to provide said chamber.
[0019] According to alternative preferred feature of the invention said large diameter hole
is enlarged in diameter at its lower end to provide said chamber.
[0020] According to an alternative form of the invention of said large diameter hole is
enlarged at its lower end to provide said chamber and at spaced intervals along its
length to provide spaces to accommodate explosive charges.
[0021] According to a preferred feature of the invention said blast holes are charged with
explosive charges in the region of the walls of the chamber which have been exposed
by the previous blast.
[0022] The invention will be more fully understood of the light of the following description
of one specific embodiment. The description is made with reference to the accompanying
drawings of which:-
Fig. 1 is a cross-sectional representation of a shaft showing the pattern of drill
holes used for a lift according to the embodiment;
Fig. 2 is a longitudinal section along line A-A of Fig. 1 of the lower portion of
a lift according to the embodiment showing a blasting arrangement for a lift;
Figs. 3A, B, C and D are four longitudinal sections of the lower part of the lift
at various phases of the embodiment;
Fig. 4 is a schematic representation of a vacuum bogging installation which may be
used with the embodiment;
Fig. 5 is a sectional side elevational of a reamer according to the embodiments in
the collapsed mode;
Fig. 6 is a sectional side elevation of a reamer according to the embodiment in the
expanded mode; and
Fig. 7 is a cross-sectional view of a reamer along line A-A of Fig. 6.
[0023] The embodiment is directed to the sinking of a shaft in a series of lifts. At the
commencement of each lift all of the required blast holes 1 to 23 (see Fig. 1) which
are required are drilled to the full length of the lift according to a somewhat conventional
pattern. In addition a central large diameter hole A is driven for the full length
of the lift. The large diameter hole is then reamed out to define an enlarged chamber
B at the lower end of the hole at least, using a reamer of the form shown at Figs.
5 to 7 described below. If desired the hole A may reamed out for its whole length
using the reamer of Figs. 5 to 7 or a conventional hole opener as is commonly used
in oil well drilling.
[0024] Suitable diameters for the central large diameter hole may be of the order of 254
to 311 mms and the blast holes may have diameters in the region of 121 mms. The blast
hole pattern is controlled by well known criteria which include:-
(a) explosive weight to broken rock volume ratios;
(b) explosives strength;
(-c) rock swell factor (rock when crushed and well broken by explosives expands by
a factor of 35 per cent);
(-d) the distance of easer holes from the central large diameter hole;
(e) the ratio of burden on a hole to the length of the free face it is breaking to.
(This ratio should be in the range of .5 to .87 - except for the initial cut easers);
(f) if two holes are blasting to a free face the load should be equally distributed
between them and the ratio of burden to the hole spacing should not be less than .5.
(Blasting of two such holes simultaneously will break the wedge of rock between them
which would otherwise remain unbroken if the holes were blasted separately.)
[0025] On drilling of the blast holes and the central large diameter hole the lower end
of all of the drill holes 1 to 23 surrounding the chamber B are charged with explosive.
The explosives are fired sequentially whereby the broken rock material produced by
each firing fills the chamber B. Between each firing at least a portion of the broken
rock material so produced is removed by vacuum bogging to provide sufficient space
for the rock material produced by the subsequent firing. At the conclusion of the
first round the chamber B formed by the blasting has the desired lateral dimensions
of the shaft.
[0026] The height to which each hole is charged with explosives to form the initial chamber
depends upon the expected height of subsequent rounds, the proportion of oversized
[0027] fragments produced, the depth of butts (i.e. holes left in the floor because rock
will not break to the full depth of the charged hole) and the type of blasting action
applied. The rounds fired after the initial chamber round can be fired either as big
hole burn cuts or as modified pyramid cuts. In the first case the holes are first
plugged at the bottom (i.e. where they emerge from the free face) by a suitable means.
An example of such means comprise using short lengths of closed pipe made of a suitable
malleable metal and containing a small charge of lower power explosives. These would
be lowered to the bottom of the hole where the charge would be detonated wedging the
pipe against the walls of the hole. The holes are then loaded with explosives to the
required height above the free face and sealed with a plug of a suitable impervious
compound. The holes are then filled with water which acts as an efficient stemming
to confine the explosives. In the cut holes and easer holes 1 to 5 or 9, the explosives
should be distributed along the full length of the appropriate section of the hole
rather than tamped into the top half as is sometimes the practice. In some rock conditions
this can result in failure through the collar of the rock failing to break. In order
to maintain a reasonable explosives ratio, the holes are not completely filled with
explosives, rather the charges are broken up into segments by the use of wooden spacer
blocks. The holes are fired in the sequence indicated in Fig. 6 using suitable time
delay electric detonators.
[0028] The disadvantage of the above system is that the central large diameter hole A must
be reamed out to full size throughout its entire length. This is not necessary if
a modified pyramid cut is used for further rounds after the initial chamber has been
formed. Referring to Fig. 2, the line 40 therein is taken as an imaginary conical
surface the base diameter of which corresponds to the minimum diameter of the shaft
and the apex of which is located at the centre of the shaft. A chamber 50 is reamed
in the central large diameter hole at the apex of the cone 40 using the hole reamer
described below. Similar chambers are located at regular intervals up the length of
the central large diameter hole A. The interval corresponding to the height of the
rounds. The bottom of the central hole is blocked by suitable means and filled with
a quick setting cement grout 52. The chamber is filled with explosives 53 and sealed
with a plug of suitable impervious compound 54. The hole is then filled with water
55 which acts as stemming to confine the charge. Surrounding holes are similarly plugged
at the bottom and filled with a quick setting grout 56 to a point half way between
the face the surface of the cone. They are filled with explosives 57 to slightly above
the surface of the cone. An impervious plug is placed on top of the explosives and
more grout 58 is placed extending from the impervious plug to a point half way to
a horizontal plane extending through the apex of the cone. More explosives 59 are
then placed extending to above the horizonal plane and impervious plugs 60 are placed
above the explosives 59. The drill holes are then filled with water as described above.
The peripheral holes 14 to 23 inclusive are partially filled with grout 61 topped
with explosives 62 to the same height as the other holes, plugged and filled with
water stemming. The charge in the reamed chamber and the charges in the bottom part
of the surrounding holes are detonated simultaneously using instantaneous electric
detonators. The charges in the top part of the hole surrounding the central hole and
the peripheral holes are detonated in the sequence indicated in Fig. 6 using suitable
time delay electric detonators.
[0029] Fig. 4 illustrates a suitable vacuum of bogging installation for extracting rock
material from the first and subsequent lifts. The installation comprises a pair of
extractor fans 20 and 21 which exhaust a cylindrical hopper 22 through a duct 23.
The inlet hopper 22 is connected to an inlet duct 24 which terminates at a vertical
leg which telescopically receives a delivery duct 25. The delivery duct 25 passes
through the central large diameter hole A and terminates at the chamber B. A seal
26 is provided between the ducts 24 and 25. The lower end of the delivery duct 25
supports the flexible tube 27 which is located in the chamber B and picks up rock
material in the chamber B for it to be carried to the hopper 22. The delivery duct
can be raised or lowered by means of a winch 28 which is connected to a collar clamp
29 on the exterior of the delivery duct 25. A further support collar 30 is countered
to the exterior of the delivery duct 25 to support the delivery duct 25 on the opening
of the large diameter hole A when the position of the collar clamp 29 is being varied
on the delivery duct. The hopper 22 has a discharge chute 31 at its lower face to
facilitate the discharge of the contents of the hopper into a truck or like means.
A gate 33 is used to close and seal the chute 31 during bogging procedures. In operation
the delivery duct 25 is lowered into the central large diameter hole A until the end
of the flexible tube contacts the broken rock material in the chamber B. Air enters
into the chamber B through the space between the delivery duct 25 and wall of the
central large diameter hole A and enters the flexible tube'entraining rock fragments
from the chamber B as it does so to carry them to the hopper 22. The end of the flexible
tube 27 is maintained in contact with the broken rock material until the required
volume of material has been removed to provide sufficient room for the next blast.
Large slabs of rock may be broken or forced out of the way by means of a heavy cable
rig type cutting tool introduced into the duct 25 after being disconnected from the
inlet duct 24. If desired suitable means may be provided on the flexible duct to facilitate
control of its position in the chamber B from the surface. In addition if desired
a camera may be lowered into the chamber B to monitor progress of the bogging operation.
[0030] The above-mentioned bogging operation will not work if the end of the flexible tube
is underwater. Therefor the level of water in the chamber B should be kept low by
the use of a suitable bore hole pump. If the water flow into the chamber is excessive
then water can replace air as the air transport medium. This would involve sealing
all drill holes and the central large diameter hole and pumping water down several
of the holes. The water would return to the surface through the delivery duct 25 to
be drained from the rock material and to be returned to the drill holes. Alternatively
if a heavy water flow is anticipated the water bearing aquifiers and/or fissures can
be sealed before drilling the lift by injecting cement grout under pressure through
the bore holes according to established procedures.
[0031] Fig. 3 shows a sequence of blasting a lift and clearing the chamber. The position
before firing the first pyramid cut is shown at Fig. 3A and position after firing
the first pyramid cut is shown at Fig. 3B. In the representative example shown in
relation to the drawing, because 0.2 metres of butts are left the advance is 2.9 metres,
breaking (32.7 X 2.9) 94.8 cubic metres which expands to (94.8 X 1.35) 128 cubic metres.
This leaves (94.8 + (136.8 - 128)) 103.6 cubic metres of free space which must be
increased to 128 cubic metres by vacuum bogging 24.4 cubic metres of broken rock which
represents (

) 19% of the weight of material broken by the first round. The position after vacuum
bogging is shown in Fig. 3C.
[0032] The position after firing the second round is shown in Fig. 3D.
[0033] The free space is 94.8 cubic metres which must be increased to 128 cubic metres by
vacuum bogging 33.2 cubic metres which represents (33.21 128) 26% of the rock broken
by the second round. This procedure is followed for the remainder of the lift, that
is, after each 2.9 metre high round is fired 26% of broken material is removed. Finally
when the last round of the lift is fired as a big hole burn cut, the residual broken
rock which fills the lift from top to bottom is removed on a continuous basis by any
suitable means such as a cactus grab.
[0034] When all of the rock material has been extracted from the lift the walls of the shaft
are inspected and loose rock is removed. Rock bolts and mesh are installed in the
walls of the shaft and any residual broken rock is removed from the shaft by hand
bogging. When all broken rock is removed from the shaft suitable form-work is then
lowered and installed in the shaft and the space between them and the walls of the
shaft is filled with concrete as one continuous monolith which may be formed at the
top to form the floor of the plat thereon and the section of the shaft below the formwork
is then stripped to form the next plat and the drilling equipment is moved down to
this level for the next lift.
[0035] In enlarging the diameter of the central large diameter hole A a reamer may be used
as discussed. The reamer may take the form of that shown at Figs. 5, 6 and 7. The
reamer comprises substantially a cylindrical body 5 which is threaded at one end for
engagement with the lower end of a drill string 14. The other end of the body 5 is
formed with four axially extending prong 6 which are received in a slotted tube 7.
The interior of the tube 7 supports a pair of diametrically opposed guides 8. The
body 5 pivotally supports a pair of wings 1 which are received in the slots of the
tube 7 and pivotally mounted to the body to pivot about a chord axis of the body 5
and are pivotable between a position at which their exterior cutting surface 3 is
substantially co-linear with the exterior surface of the slotted tube 7 and body 5
and an outer position as shown at Fig. 6 at which the exterior cutting surface 3 is
inclined outwardly from the body 5. The exterior surface 3 of the wings support tungsten
carbide or diamond or like abrasive elements. The interior face of the wings 1 are
formed such that they are complimentary with each other and when wings are at their
innermost position in the tube as shown at Fig. 5 the inner edges of the wings matingly
engage each other. The inner edges of the wings 1 are associated with a wedge member
9 which is slidably supported within the slotted tube 7 on the guides 8 between the
wings whereby with axial movement of the wedge 9 away from the cylindrical body 5
the wedge engages the innermost edge of the wings 1 to force the wings to their outermost
position. The movement of the wedge 9 is effected through a push rod 10 driven from
a hydraulic cylinder 12 whereby the push rod 10 is fixed at its end to the piston
11 of the hydraulic cylinder 12 and fluid is introduced into the hydraulic cylinder
through the hydraulic line 13 which is supported in the drill string 14. The piston
11 is biassed to its retracted position within the hydraulic cylinder 12 by a spring
15.
[0036] Drilling fluid is supplied to the exterior cutting surface of the wings 1 through
passages 2 in the cylindrical body 5 whereby the passages extend from the interior
of the drill string to the exterior cutting surface 3.
[0037] In operation the reamer is attached to the end of the drill string in its closed
position and lowered to the point in the hole where reaming is to commence. The rotary
drive on the drill is engaged giving the reamer a suitable rotation speed and the
reamer hydraulic cylinder 12 is then pressurised so that the wedge 9 starts to force
the wings 1 apart bringing the cutting surfaces 3 into contact with the walls of the
hole at a suitable pressure. This is continued until the wings are fully extended
as shown at Fig. 7. The pullback mechanism on the drill is then activated so that
the combination of suitable revolution speed and suitable pressure on the cutting
surface reams out the hole over the required length. To pull the reamer out of the
hole the pressure in the hydraulic cylinder 12 is released and the spring 15 causes
the wedge 9 to be retracted to its position adjacent the cylindrical block 5. The
rock surface will then force the wings 1 back to their closed position as the drill
string pulling continues to extract the reamer from the hole.
[0038] It should be appreciated that the scope of the present invention need not be limited
to the particular scope of the embodiment described above.
1. A method of sinking shafts comprising excavating a series of lifts wherein each
lift is excavated by drilling a pattern of blast holes (1-23) for the full depth of
the lift including boring a large diameter hole (A) and creating a chamber (B) at
the lower end of the large diameter hole, blasting the upper walls of the chamber
to deposit rock material into the chamber, extracting at least a portion of the rock
material created by the blast and repeating the blasting and extraction step throughout
the length of the lift wherein on the volume of said lift being blasted the remaining
rock broken material is extracted.
2. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the initial blasting and extraction step
requires blasting of the upper and lateral walls of the chamber to form an enlarged
chamber having the desired lateral dimensions of the shaft.
3. A method as claimed in claim 1 or claim 2 wherein sufficient rock material is extracted
between each blasting step to provide sufficient space for the rock material created
by the subsequent blast.
4. A method as claimed in any preceding claim wherein said large diameter hole is
enlarged throughout its length to provide said chamber.
5. A method as claimed in any of claims 1 to 3 wherein said large diameter hole is
enlarged in diameter at its lower end to provide said chamber.
6. A method as claimed in any of claims 1 to 3 wherein the large diameter hole is
enlarged at its lower end to provide said chamber and at spaced intervals to provide
spaces to accommodate explosive charges.
7. A method as claimed in claim 6 wherein said intervals correspond to the location
of each round of explosive for each blast.
8. A method as claimed in any preceding claim wherein said blast holes are charged
with explosives in the region of the walls of the chamber exposed by the previous
blast.
9. A reaming tool for enlarging the diameter of bore holes comprising a body (5) dimensioned
to be able to pass through said bore hole, a plurality of wing members (1) pivotally
mounted to the upper portion of said body to be pivotable outwardly from a position
at which they are substantially within the dimension of the body, the outer face (3)
of the wing supporting abrasion resistant cutting elements, and drive means (9) to
cause outward pivotable movement of the wing.
10. A reamer as claimed in claim 9 wherein the body is adapted to be mounted to a
drill string (14) which causes rotation of the reamer.
11. A reamer as claimed in claim 9 or 10 wherein the body supports a wedge member
(9) which is movable through the body to be engaged with the inner faces of the wing
members to cause said outward pivotable movement.
12. A reamer as claimed in claim 11 wherein said wedge member (9) is biased to a position
out of engagement with the wing members.
13. A reamer as claimed in claim 12 wherein said wedge members (9) are caused to move
through the action of a hydraulic cylinder (12).
14. A reamer as claimed in any of claims 9 to the preceding claim wherein there is
at least one pair of wing members (1) wherein the wing members of each pair are mounted
in opposed relation to each other.