[0001] The present invention relates to relatively low-cost stainless steel alloys used
for casting applications, e.g. turbine and turbocharger housings, exhaust manifolds,
combustion chambers, etc. having satisfactory corrosion resistance and other properties
at room and elevated temperatures in the operating range up to 2000°F (1093°C).
[0002] Cast articles of this type, in particular, automotive or aircraft tubocharger housings,
are subject to elevated operating temperatures up to about 2000°F (1093°C), and must
be abel to contain a turbine wheel generating very high rotational speeds. In turbochargers
for truck diesel engines, the temperature reaches 1300-1400°F (704-760°C) resulting
in hausing metal termperatures of 1200-1300°F (649-704°C). In passenger car turbochargers,
however, the operating temperatures extend up to the 1750-2000°F (954-1909°C) range,
which results in metal temperatures of 1550-1950°F (843-1066°C) at the gas inlet or
tongue section of the turbocharger housing since this inlet area is within a few degrees
of the turbine exhaust temperature and is insulated so that heat is not dissipated
rapidly. It is in metal sections such as this gas inlet area of an automotive turbocharger
where the exhaust gas initially contacts the turbocharger, that thermal cracking is
encountered, unless relatively expensive stainless steel casting alloys are employed.
[0003] The commercially available HD alloy which is inherently a duplex material contains
about 26-30% chromium and 4-7% nickel, however, because of the relatively low nickel
content, it is subject to sigma phase formation, which becomes very brittle and gives
rise to thermal cracking when used at elevated temperatures, particularly when the
cast material is subjected to thermal cycling. In the past, the shortcomings of the
HD series alloys have been overcome by adopting a stainless steel casting alloy of
higher nickel content such as commercially available high nickel ductile iron casting
alloys. Exemples of these are NiResist (Trade Mark) developed by International Nickel
Company, or HK30, a chromium-nickel-iron stainless steel alloy containing approximately
30% chromium and 20% nickel, balance essentially iron. The HK series stainless steel
alloys in general have about 18-22% nickel and are fully austentic. The HK stainless
steel alloys are some of the strongest stainless steel casting alloys, in terms of
creep strength, however, while meeting the high temperature property requirements
for turbocharger housings, they are quite expensive and present casting difficulties
because of their high nickel content.
[0004] US Patent No. 3,969,109 Tanczyn, discloses a stainless steel wrought alloy having
a composition of 21-30% Cr, 2-10%Ni, 0.25-0.45%C, 0.01-2.5% Mn and 0.35-0.55% N, in
which high temperature strength and resistance to sulphidation and oxidation at elevated
temperatures are obtained by reducing the carbon and the manganese contents of the
commercial 21-4 stainless steel alloys. This patent, however, relates to wrought alloys
which are claimed to be fully austenitic. They are not therefore cast stainless steel
duplex alloys since they are wrought materials and do not enjoy the advantage of a
ferrite content.
[0005] It is an object of the present invention to provide a low-cost stainless steel casting
alloy which is resistant to thermal cracking, and exhibits good room temperature strength
and high creep strength and burst resistance at operating temperatures in the range
of up to 1950°F (1066°C).
[0006] It is also an object of the present invention to provide a relatively low cost stainless
steel casting alloy with improved casting characteristics.
[0007] It is a further object or the present invention to provide an improved and cost efficient
method for casting stainless steel articles for high temperature service.
[0008] According to the present invention, there is provided a cast stainless steel article
having a duplex metallurgical structure of about 20-80% ferrite, the balance being
austenite and being substantially devoid of sigma phase, the article comprising essentially
in weight percent:-

and optionally

the balance being iron with incidental impurities.
[0009] If included, the manganese and/or molybdenum would be present as a sulphide former
and one or other would be selected.
[0010] Such an article may have good resistance to thermal cracking when subjected to cycling
between room temperature and a service temperature of 1500-1950°F (816-1066°C) and
which, in the solution treated condition, may be resistant to oxidation corrosion,
may have a room temperature tensile strength of at least 75.000psi (52.7 kg/mm
2) and at least about 7% elongation.
[0011] In accordance with the present invention, therefore a duplex stainless steel alloy,
that is, a two phase alloy having both ferritic and austenitic structure, can be used
for cast metal parts subject to high operating temperatures, such as automobile turbocharger
housings, gasoline engine exhaust manifolds, and cast furnace or combustion chamber
components, thereby combining the high temperature properties of the austenitic phase
with the castability and low thermal expansion characteristic of the ferritic phase.
[0012] It has been found that the controlled addition of nitrogen to low nickel duplex stainless
steels, greatly increases their thermal cracking resistance and effectively improves
the stainless steel alloys in a manner normally achieved by higher nickel additions,
gaining the strength characteristics, the corrosion resistance, and the creep strength
of austenitic stainless steels. The resistance of the alloys of the present invention
to thermal cracking (due to higher strength and low thermal expansion), by the addition
of nitrogen rather than nickel, provides a stainless steel casting alloy functionally
equivalent to the HK series stainless steels, at substantial cost savings.
[0013] Preferably the article has a Nitrogen content of 0.3-0.4 weight percent.
[0014] Preferably, the article has a composition including by weight: 27-31 % Cr, 4-6% Ni,
0.2-0.4% C, 0.5-1.0% Mn, up to 1.0% Mo, 1-2% Si, 0.5-1.5% Nb (niobium or columbium),
0.3-0.4% N up to 0.03% P, 0.2-0.4% S, up to 0.50 Cu, up to 0.20% Al, the balance being
iron.
[0015] Preferably the article has a duplex structure of 40-60% ferrite, the balance being
austenite.
[0016] A preferred composition for the article, by weight may be 31 % chromium, 5% nickel,
0.24% carbon, 0.65% manganese, 1% silicon, 0.35% molybdenum, 0.3% sulphur, 0.9% comlumbium
(niobium), 0.32% nitrogen, the balance being iron.
[0017] According to another aspect of the invention, there is provided a method for producing
a cast stainless steel article having a duplex metallurgical structure of about 20-80%
ferrite, the balance being austenite, comprising the steps of: melting a commercial
steel mixture to a target chemistry as defined above for the article in accordance
with the invention, heating the steel alloy mixture to a temperature of about 2850-2900°F
(1566-1593°C) for a time sufficient to homogenise the melt; pouring the steel at a
tap temperature of about 2850°F(1566°C) into moduls employing gates designed to minimise
porosity; and allowing the article to solidify.
[0018] Preferably, the method includes subjecting the cast article to a solution treatment
at about 2000-2200°F (1093-1204°C) for 1-4 hours or longer to redistribute M
23C
6 carbide (where «M» is essentially chromium). Preferably, the method includes the
step of removing the gates by snap breaking after the cast article has cooled to room
temperature and before the solution treatment. Preferably, the solution treated article
is air cooled following the solution treatment and is preferably also subjected to
a strengthening treatment at about 1400-1600°F (760-871 °) for up to 24 hours.
[0019] Thus, a preferred stainless steel casting composition for turbine housings, in accondance
with the present invention, is an H-series stainless steel with a relatively low nickel
content which is modified with nitrogen to obtain a ferrite/austenite duplex structure
having ferrite in the range of 20-80%, preferably 40-60% ferrite, having improved
resistance to thermal cracking. The amount of ferrite present in the alloy microstructure
is determined by the chemistry of the alloy, the fabrication technique, and the heat
treatment employed. It is not believed that the ferritic phase contributes to the
high temperature properties of the cast alloy.
[0020] Without a solution treatment, stainless steel castings according to the invention
may be brittle and hence some form of solution treatment is preferable. The brittleness
prior to heat treatment has been found to enhance the steel casting method of the
present invention, since the cast steel gating can be designed for gate removal by
snapping rather than machine cutting. The preferred solution treatment is conducted
at 2000-2200°F (1093-1204°C) for 1 1 to 4 hours followed by air cooling. Follwing
the solution treatment, the alloy may be subjected to a strengthening treatment of
1400-1600°F (760-871 °C) for up to 24 hours, but since the cast articles encounter
temperatures in this temperature range during service, the strengthening treatment
may be effected in situ during testing or initial service of the cast articles.
[0021] The primary strengthening mechanism of the stainless steel casting of the present
invention, is believed to be by carbide dispersion in a solid solution strengthened
matrix. Of the two types of carbides formed, i.e. MC and M
23C
6, MC carbide, where «M» is essentially Cb, (Nb), is relatively unaffected by solution
treatment and hence remains as a strengthening constituent after solution treatment.
The brittle M
23C
6 carbide constituent, (where «M» is essentially Cr) is spheroidized or partially dissolved
during solution treatment. This dissolved carbide reprecipi- tates at the lower temperatures
encountered during normal operating conditions and thus enhances the strenghth of
the alloy in service. Thus the solution treatment redistributes, i.e. dissolves or
spheroi- dizes the M
23C
6 carbide, the spheroidized or droplet form of the carbide being more ductile than
the original angular form.
[0022] Sulphur is added to the stainless steel casting alloy of the present invention, in
an amount of 0.2-0.4% to enhance machinability, and is combined with manganese or
molybdenum as MnS or MoS. Silicon, which adds to the fluidity of the cast alloys,
is normally present in commercial steels in an amount up to 2%, and 2.5-1.5% niobium
is added for strengthening since niobium produces the very stable MC carbide. Tantalum
may be similarly beneficial for strengthening but is more expensive than niobium.
[0023] Another advantage found in the use of the stainless steel alloys of the present invention
is involved in the casting procedure. It has been found that the lower cost casting
techniques as normally used for casting grey or ductile iron may be employed. Steel
foundry casting methods are inherently more expensive than grey iron casting techniques,
primarily because the metal is poured at higher temperatures, of the order of 3100°F
(1704°C) in steel foundries, rather than 2600-2900°F (1427-1593°C) in iron foundries.
It was found that the stainless steel of the present invention may be cast at tap
temperature (the temprature at which steel is transferred to the pouring ladle) of
about 2850°F (1566°C).
[0024] The gating practice used in steel foundries involving the use of additional gates,
was used in the casting of the alloy of the present invention in order to obtain lower
porosity and hence better quality castings. Because of the unique chemistry and microstructure
of the stainless steel articles cast in accordance with the present invention, snap
off gates may be used because of the presence of the brittle carbide constituent M
23C
6, which partially dissolves during the solution treatment. The presence of this carbide
constituent in the as-cast condition permits removal of the gates by snap-break separation,
rather than the more expensive gate removal techniques involving machining operations,
normally used for austenitic type steel castings.
[0025] The invention may be carried into practice in various ways and some preferred embodiments
will now be illustrated in the following non-limiting examples, and with reference
to the followings drawings, in which:-
Figure 1 is a photomicrograph (at 400X) of a metallographic specimen taken from a
stainless steel turbocharger housing, cast in accordance with the present invention
having the composition shown for DMS016 with 0.16%N,
Figure 2 is a photomicrograph similar to Figure 1 the composition including 0.20%
N;
Figure 3 is a photomicrograph similar to Figure 1 the composing including 0.32% N;
Figure 4 is a photomicrograph similar to Figure 1 the composing including 0.35% N;
and
Figure 5 is a simulated model of a turbocharger housing produced on a CAD (computer
aided design) unit.
Examples
[0026] Turbine housings were prepared for testing in accordance with the present invention
made of the DMS016 alloys shown in Table I and the resulting castings had the properties
shown in Table II. Table I also shows the compositions of the closely related HC,
HD and HK series alloys. The pouring temperature varied from 2733-2770° (1500-1521
°C) for twelve (12) ladles poured in connection with the above example. The charge
material was a commercial mixture approximating the desired chemistry of the DMS016
alloys in accordance with the invention.
[0027] Figure 1 is a 400X photomicrograph, showing the microstructure of alloy DMS016 modified
with 0.16% N, at 400X showing approximately 10% austenite, which is the lighter phase,
the darker phase being ferrite. The microstructure shown in Figure 2, (0.20%N) contains
about 20% austenite, the microstructure shown in Figure 3 (0.32%N) contains about
40-50% austenite, and the microstructure shown in Figure 4 having 0.35% N contains
about 50-55% austenite.
[0028]

[0029] A particular requirement for a turbocharger housing is that it must contain a wheel
burst. The contain- . ment test is performed to determine whether the turbine housing
of the particular alloy will contain a wheel which bursts as the rotating speed is
increased in accordance with a particular containment requirement policy. Turbocharger
manufacturers typically have several burst containment tests, i.e. for auto (gasoline),
diesel and aircraft turbochargers. The first two tests are generally similar, while
the latter (aircraft) may differ primarily in the use of a mechanically weakened wheel.
[0030] A test of the alloy designated DMS016
2, was run on a containment burst test stand. The shaft-wheel was modified to facilitate
bursting, in accordance with standard aircraft test procedures, by drilling an axial
hole in the hub and three holes in the back disc to obtain a three piece hub burst.
The turbine inlet temperature was controlled to 1750°F (954°C) at the turbine inlet
flange and the turbocharger was ' stabilised for 10 minutes at 97,500 rpm at 1750°F
(954°C) turbine inlet temperature. The turbocharger was then rapidly accelerated until
the weakened wheel burst at approximately 159,000 rpm. The housing was found to contain
the wheel burst. The results of this test show that a turbocharger housing made of
the material of the alloy, indentified as DMS016
2, passes the same burst test as alloy the designated HK 30 plus Cb, which is the current
austenitic alloy used for aircraft turbocharger housings.
[0031] A conventional aircraft turbine housing 10, as shown in Figure 5 was cast from the
alloy of the present invention designated DMS016
2 and completed 600 hours of gas stand cyclic durability testing at an inlet temperature
of 1750°F (954°C). Visual examination of the unit after completion of 600 hours of
testing showed no cracks either at the tongue section 12, shown in Figure 5, or at
the top of the volute (gas passage) surface. Hence, the cast housing made of alloy
DMS016
2 was found to have excellent resistance to thermal cracking.
[0032] Oxidation testing at 1500°F (816°C) showed a weight loss of 0.03% after 100 hours.
The sulphidation test at 1700°F (927°C) showed a weight loss of approximately 0.4%
in one hour.
[0033] Thermal expansion measurements of the alloy of the present invention showed a linear
expansion coefficient of 18.6 x 10.
6 C 0 (10. 1 10-6 F°) over the range of 300 - 1000°C. This expansion rate is similar
to that of HK 30 stainless steel.
[0034] The turbocharger housing finite element thermal stress model shown in Figure 5 compared
the standard NiResist material (D-5S) with a similar housing model constructed of
the alloy DMS016
2, and the results shown in Table III, show that while DMS016
2 developed greater stress, it had a greater fatigue life. The temperature at the tongue
12 was 1520°F (827°C) and in the waste gate port region 16 was 1480°F (804°C). While
these results were based on very limited creep data, the values for which may vary
significantly, the data as shown in Table III indicates greater durability in the
alloy of the present invention, DMS016
2.
[0035] The finite element stress analysis identified two distinct critical areas where fatigue
cracks are expected to occur, namely the tongue 12 and the waste gate port region
16. Thus, it was found that DMS016
2 has higher strength at elevated temperatures than D5S (NiResist) and also has a higher
modulus of elasticity and a slightly lower co-efficient of thermal expansion. The
result is a casting able to withstand higher thermal stress.
[0036] Five samples of DMS016 with varying amounts of

nitrogen, were prepared and subjected to mechanical testing, the results of which
are shown in Table IV. Since a minimum of about 7% of elongation is required for satisfactory
ductility, these data indicate about 0.20% minimum nitrogen is required. The elongation
data shown in Table IV also show cast samples of DMS016 alloy to be substantially
devoid of the brittle sigma phase constituent in DMS016 alloys having a nitrogen content
of 0.20% or more. The maximum solubility of N is about 0.6%. At 0.5% N, brittle nitrogen
compounds may appear, which will reduce ductility.
[0037] Based upon the experiments performed and the turbine housings exposed to a simulated
or actual environment, the DMS016 alloy appears to meet the development guidelines
that were established in that it has castability, machinability and service properties
equal to or superior to D5S NiResist and in many areas approaches the properties of
HK30 stainless steel, a more expensive high nickel material.

1. A cast stainless steel article having a duplex metallurgical structure of about
20 to 80% ferrite, the balance being austenite, and being substantially devoid of
sigma phase the article comprising in weight percent:

and optionally

the balance being iron with incidental impurities.
2. An article as claimed in Claim 1 characterised by a nitrogen content of 0.3 - 0.4
weight percent.
3. An article as claimed in Claim 1 or Claim 2 characterised by a duplex structure
of 40 - 60% ferrite, the balance being austenite.
4. An article as claimed in any preceding claim characterised by consisting by weight
of 31 % chromium, 5% nickel, 0.24% carbon, 0.65% manganese, 1 % silicon, 0.35% molybdenum,
0.3% sulphur, 0.9% niobium, 0.32% nitrogen, the balance being iron.
5. An article as claimed in any preceding claim characterised by its having been solution
treated for 1 to 4 hours at about 2000 to 2200°F (1093 - 1204°C).
6. An article as claimed in Claim 5 characterised by its having been air cooled from
the solution treatment and subsequently subjected to a strengthening heat treatment
at 1400 to 1600°F (760 - 871 °C) for up to 24 hours. -
7. A method for producing a cast stainless steel article having a duplex metallurgical
structure of about 20 - 80% ferrite, the balance being austenite, comprising the steps
of: melting a commercial steel mixture to a taraet chemistrv of in weiaht oercent:

and optionally

the balance being iron with incidental impurities, heating the steel alloy mixture
to a temperature of about 2850 - 2900°F (1566 - 1593°C) for a time sufficient to homogenise
the melt; pouring the steel at a tap temperature of about 2850° F ( 1566 °C) into
moulds employing gates designed to minimise porosity; and allowing the article to
solidify.
8. A method as claimed in Claim 7 characterised by subjecting the cast article to
a solution treatment at about 2000 - 2200°F (1093 - 1204°C) for 1 - 4 hours or longer
to redistribute M23C6 carbide (where «M» is essentially chromium).
9. A method as claimed in Claim 8 characterised by the step of removing the gates
by snap breaking after the cast article has cooled to room temperature and before
the solution treatment.
10. A method as claimed in Claim 8 or Claim 9 characterised in that the solution treated
article is air cooled following the solution treatment.
11. A method as claimed in any of Claims 8 to 10 characterised in that the cast article
is subjected to a strengthening treatment at about 1400 - 1600°F (760 - 817°C) for
up to 24 hours.
1. Gegenstand aus nichtrostendem Gußstahl mit einem metallurgischen Doppelgefüge von
etwa 20 - 80% Ferrit, Rest Austenit, bei dem eine Sigma-Phase im wesentlichen fehlt,
bestehend aus (in Gewichtsprozent):

der Rest Eisen mit zufälligen Verunreinigungen.
2. Gegenstand nach Anspruch 1, gekennzeichnet durch einen Stickstoffgehalt von 0,3
- 0,4 Gewichtsprozent.
3. Gegenstand nach Anspruch 1 oder 2, gekennzeichnet durch eine Doppelstruktur von
40 - 60% Ferrit, Rest Austenit.
4. Gegenstand nach einem der vorausgehenden Ansprüche, dadurch gekennzeichnet durch
(in Gewichtsprozent) 31 % Chrom, 5% Nickel, 0,24% Kohlenstoff, 0,65% Mangan, 1 % Silizium,
0,35% Molybdän, 0,3% Schwefel, 0,9% Niobium, 0,32% Stickstoff, Rest Eisen.
5. Gegenstand nach einem der vorausgehenden Ansprüche, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß
er 1 bis 4 Stunden lang bei etwa 1093-1204° C in Lösung behandelt worden ist.
6. Gegenstand nach Anspruch 5, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß er nach der Lösungsbehandlung
luftgekühlt und anschliessend einer der Verfestigung dienenden, bis zu 24 Stunden
andauernden Wärmebehandlung bei 760 - 871 °C unterzogen wird.
7. Verfahren zum Herstellen eines Gegenstandes aus nichtrostendem Gußstahl mit einer
metallurgischen Doppelstruktur aus etwa 20 - 80% Ferrit, Rest Austenit, dadurch gekennzeichnet,
daß ein kommerzielles Stahlgemisch in ein chemisches Material geschmolzen wird, dessen
Zusammensetzung in Gewichtsprozent ist:

der Rest Eisen mit zufälligen Verunreinigungen, daß das Stahllegierungsgemisch auf
eine Temperatur von etwa 1566 - 1593 °C über eine Zeitdauer erhitzt wird, die ausreicht,
um die Schmelze zu homogenisieren, daß der Stahl bei einer Anstichtemperatur von etwa
1566 °C in Formen gegossen wird, wobei Ausgänge verwendet werden, die so ausgelegt
sind, daß die Porosität ein Minimum wird, und daßsich der Gegenstand verfestigen kann.
8. Verfahren nach Anspruch 7, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß der Gußgegenstand einer
Lösungsbehandlung bei etwa 1093 -1204 °C über 1 bis 4 Stunden Zeitdauer oder länger
unterzogen wird, um M23C6-Karbit neu zu verteilen (wobei «M» im wesentlichen Chrom ist).
9. Verfahren nach Anspruch 8, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß die Ausgänge durch Schnapp-Brechen
entfernt werden, nachdem der Gußgegenstand auf Raumtemperatur abgekühlt ist, und bevor
die Lösungsbehandlung durchgeführt wird.
10. Verfahren nach Anspruch 8 oder 9, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß der durch Lösung
behandelte Gegenstand im Anschluß an die Lösungsbehandlung luftgekühlt wird.
11. Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 8 bis 10, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß der Gußgegenstand
einer Verfestigungsbehandlung bei etwa 760 - 810 °C über eine Zeitdauer bis zu 24
Stunden unterzogen wird.
1. Produit en acier inoxydable moulé possédant une structure métallurgique double
à environ 20 à 80% de ferrite, le complément étant de l'austénite, et sensiblement
exempte de phase sigma, ce produit comprenant en pourcentage en poids:

le complément étant du fer comprenant des impuretés insignifiantes.
2. Produit suivant la revendication 1, caractérisé par une teneur en azote de 0,3
à 0,4% en poids.
3. Produit suivant l'une des revendications 1 et 2, caractérisé par une structure
double à 40 à 60% de ferrite, le complément étant de l'austénite.
4. Produit suivant l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en
ce qu'il consiste, en poids, en 31 % de chrome, 5% de nickel, 0,24% de carbone, 0,65%
de manganèse, 1 % de silicium, 0,35% de molybdène, 0,3% de soufre, 0,9% de niobium
et 0,32% d'azote, le complément étant du fer.
5. Produit suivant l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en
ce qu'il a été soumis à un recuit de mise en solution pendant 1 à 4 heures à environ
2000 à 2200°F (1093 à 1204°C).
6. Produit suivant la revendication 5, caractérisé en ce qu'il a été soumis à un refroidissement
par air à la suite du recuit de mise en solution, puis soumis à un recuit de consolidation
à 1400 à 1600°F (760 à 871 °C) pendant jusqu'à 24 heures.
7. Procédé de production d'un produit en acier inoxydable moulé possédant une structure
métallurgique double à environ 20 à 80% de ferrite, le complément étant de l'austénite,
ce procédé consistant à élaborer, à l'état fondu, un mélange pour acier du commerce
possédant une composition chimique prévue comprenant en pourcentage en poids:

et éventuellement

le complément étant du fer comprenant des impuretés insignifiantes, à porter la température
du mélange d'acier allié à environ 2850 à 2900°F (1566 à 1593°C) pendant une période
de temps suffisante pour réaliser l'homogénéisation de l'acier en fusion, à couler
cet acier à une température de coulée d'environ 2850°F (1566°C) dans des moules utilisant
des attaques conçues pour rendre la porosité minimale et à laisser le produit se solidifier.
8. Procédé suivant la revendication 7, caractérisé en ce qu'on soumet le produit moulé
à un recuit de mise en solution à environ 2000 à 2200°F (1093 à 1204°C) pendant 1
à 4 heures ou plus longtemps, afin de redistribuer le carbure M23C6 (dans lequel «M» est essentiellement le chrome).
9. Procédé suivant la revendication 8, caractérisé en ce qu'il comporte l'opération
consistant à séparer les carottes par rupture brusque une fois que le produit s'est
refroidi jusqu'à la température ambiante et avant le recuit de mise en solution.
10. Procédé suivant l'une des revendications 8 et 9, caractérisé en ce que le produit
ayant subi le recuit de mise en solution est soumis à un refroidissement par air à
la suite de ce recuit de mise en solution.
11. Procédé suivant l'une quelconque des revendications 8 à 10, caractérisé en ce
que le produit moulé est soumis à un recuit de consolidation à environ 1400 à 1600°F
(760 à 871 °C) pendant jusqu'à 24 heures.