Field of the Invention:
[0001] This invention relates to the art of papermaking, particularly to treating paper
products having additives such as protein, carboxy methyl cellulose, polyvinyl alcohol,
latex, milk, or starch with heat and then immediately rewetting the product to improve
its properties, including dry and wet stiffness, wet tensile strength and opacity.
Description of the Prior Art:
[0002] In the art of papermaking, it is customary to subject felted fibers to wet pressing,
to consolidate the web, and then to drying on heated rolls.
[0003] There is currently considerable interest in improving various properties of paper
and boards. Quantifiable paper properties include: dry and wet tensile strength, folding
endurance, stiffness, compressive strength, and opacity, among others. Which qualities
should desirably be enhanced epends upon the intended application of the product..
In the case of milk carton board, for example, stiffness is of utmost importance.
Linerboard has three qualities f particular interest, namely wet strength, folding
endurance, nd high humidity compression strength.
[0004] All of these properties can be measured by well-known tandard teats. As used herein,
then, "wet strength" means et tensile strength as measured by American Society for
esting and Materials (ASTM) Standard D829-48. "Folding ndurance" is defined as the
number of times a board can e folded in two directions without breaking, under conditions
pecified in Standard D2176-69. " Stiffness" is defined s flexural rigidity and is
determined by the bending moment in g-cm. "Linerboard", as used herein, is a medium-weight
paper product used as the facing material in corrugated carton construction. Kraft
linerboard_ia linerboard made according to the kraft process, and is well known in
the industry. Folding carton board is a medium to heavy weight paper product made
of unbleached and/or bleached pulps of basis weights from 40-350 g/m
2.
[0005] Prior workers in this field have recognized that high-temperature treatment of paperboard
can improve its wet strength. See, for example E. Back, "Wet stiffness by heat treatment
of the running web", Pulp & Paper Canada, vol. 77, No. 12, pp. 97-106 (Dec. 1976).
This increase has been attributed to the development and cross-linking of naturally
occurring lignins and other polymers, which phenomenon may be sufficient to preserve
product wet strength even where conventional synthetic resins or other binders are
entirely omitted.
[0006] It is noteworthy that wet strength improvement by heat curing has previously been
thought attainable only at the price of increased brittleness (i.e., reduced folding
endurance). Embrittled board is not acceptable for many applications involving subsequent
deformation, and therefore heat treatment alone, to develop the wet strength of paperboard
and carton board, has not gained widespread acceptance. As Dr. Back has pointed out
in the article cited above, "the heat treatment conditions must be selected to balance
the desirable increase in wet stiffness against the simultaneous embrittlement in
dry climates." Also, in U.S. Patent 3,875,680, Dr. Back has disclosed a process for
heat treating already manufactured corrugated board to set previously placed resins,
wherein the specific purpose is to avoid running embrittled material through a corrugator.
[0007] It is plain that improved stiffness and wet strength, on one hand, and improved folding
endurance, on the other, were previously thought to be incompatible results.
[0008] It is, therefore, an object of the invention to produce paperboard having both improved
stiffness and wet strength, and improved folding endurance.
[0009] With a view to the foregoing, a process has been developed which dramatically and
unexpectedly increases not only the stiffness and wet strength of various paperboards,
but also preserves their folding endurance. In its broadest sense, the invention comprises
steps of 1) applying one or more additives selected from the group including protein,
carboxy methyl cellulose, polyvinyl alcohol, latex, milk or starch to paperboard,
2) heating the paperboard so treated to an internal temperature of at least 400°P
(205°C) for a'period of time sufficient to increase the wet strength of the boards
and optionally 3) rewetting the board immediately after the heat treatment to at least
11 moisture by weight. These steps are followed by conventional drying and/or conditioning
of the treated board. It is to be understood that steps 2 and 3 can be repeated several
times.
[0010] This method produces a product having folding endurance greatly exceeding that of
similar board whose stiffness and wet strength have been increased by heat alone.
This is clearly shown by our tests exemplified below.
[0011] Of course, those skilled in the art will recognize the necessity of the product conditioning
to a normal moisture content after this very hot treatment. See, for example, U.S.
Patent 3,395,219. A certain amount of rewetting is normally done, and in fact product
properties are never even tested prior to conditioning. However, conventional rehumidification
is done after the product has substantially cooled.
[0012] Our rewetting treatment differs from conventional conditioning in that we add water,
by spraying or otherwise, to a very hot and dry paper or board at the very end of
the heat treatment, without intermediate cooling. It is critical that water be applied
to the product while it is still hot, certainly above 50°C (122°F), and preferably
above 205°C (400°F). Another heat treatment or drying step may follow rewetting, on
or off the machine, during a subsequent operation such as sizing, coating or calendering.
[0013] We prefer to raise the internal temperature of the board to at least 450°F (232°C)
during the heat treating step, as greater stiffness and wet strength are then achieved.
This may be because at higher temperatures, shorter step duration is necessary to
develop bonding, and there is consequently less time for fiber degradation to occur.
Also, shorter durations enable one to achieve higher production speeds.
[0014] While the invention may be practiced over a range of temperatures, pressures and
duration, these factors are interrelated. For example, the use of higher temperatures
requires a heat treating step of shorter duration, and vice-versa. For example, at
550OF (289°C), a duration of 2 seconds has been found sufficient to obtain the desired
improvements, while at 420°F, considerably longer is required.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED RMBODIMBNT
[0015] The invention can be carried out either on a conventional papermaking machine or
off the machine in an oven after a size-press; for high speed production, a papermaking
machine is preferred.
[0016] In either event, the paper product is first treated by adding to it one or more of
the following additives: protein, polyvinyl, alcohol, carboxy methyl cellulose, starch,
latex or milk. The additive may be mixed with the pulp prior to sheet forming, or
it may be added to a formed sheet by spraying or other means. Following wet pressing,
the paper product is heat treated.
[0017] In the heat treatment step, the initial water content of the web must be in the range
of 1-40% by weight and preferably to within the 10-15% range. Sufficient heat is then
applied to the board to achieve an internal paper temperature of at least 400°F (205°C).
The heat can be applied in the form of hot air, superheated steam, heated drying cylinders,
infrared heaters, or by other means. Alternatively, the invention may be practiced
by heating paper product in an oven after a size-press. The internal temperature of
the board should be brought to at least 400°F for at least 10 sec. Again, the nature
of the heat source is not important.
[0018] It is preferred that the paper be immediately rewetted following the heat treating
step, and while the paper is still hot. Water may be applied by spraying or other
means. Even though one effect of the water application is to cool the paper, it is
important that the paper not be allowed to cool substantially before the water application.
[0019] The heat treated and rewetted paper is then cooled, conditioned, and calendered according
to conventional procedure.
[0020] The invention has been practiced as described in the following examples. The improvement
in board quality will be apparent from an examination of the test results listed in
the tables below.
EXAMPLE 1
[0021] A commercial.bleached kraft board was sized with different starch protein (casein)
mixtures. Both starch and casein solutions had the same concentration of 8% polymer
by weight. The size press was adjusted to have a polymer add-on of 2.4% by weight.
A part of the samples was conventionally dried (C) on Emerson speed drier, model 10
at 230°F (110°C). Another portion of the samples was heat treated (HT) at 400°F (205°C)
for 30 seconds and rewetted immediately after heat treated. After conditioning for
48 hours under standard conditions (70°F, 65% relative humidity), the samples were
tested for stiffness (Table I).

EXAMPLE 2
[0022] Board as in Example I was sized with different starch - whole milk mixtures. Starch
and milk concentrations were 8' and 4% by weight respectively. The size press pressure
was adjusted to achieve an add-on value of 2.4% by weight. A part of the sized samples
was conventionally dried on an Emerson speed drier, model 10 at 230°F (110°C). Another
portion of the samples was heat treated at 400°F (205°C) for 30 seconds. All the samples
were conditioned for 48 hours under standard conditions. The resultant properties
are listed in Table
II.

EXAMPLE 3
[0023] Board as in Example 1 was treated with a 50:50 mixture of starch and acrylic latex
(Rohm-Maas Rhoplex HA-16). The starch and latex concentrations were 8% and 50% respectively.
The size press pressure was adjusted to achieve a polymer add-on of 10.5%. A portion
of the samples was conventionally dried on Emerson.Speed drier, model 10 at 230°F
(110°C). Another portion of the samples was heat treated at 400°F (250°C) for 30 seconds.
All the samples were conditioned for 48 hours under standard conditions. The resultant
sample properties are listed in Table III.

EXAMPLE 4
[0024] A commercial kraft linerboard having a kappa number of 105 and Canadian Standard
Freeness of 720 mls was sized and treated as in Example 1. After conditioning for
48 hours under standard conditions, all the samples were tested for their properties
(Tables IVa and IVb).

EXAMPLE 5
[0025] The same board as in Example 4 was sized and treated as in Example 2. All the samples
were conditioned for 48 hours under standard conditions. The resultant board properties
are listed in Table V.

EXample 6
[0026] The same board as in Example 4 was sized and treated as in Example 3. All the samples
were conditioned for 48 hours under standard conditions. The resultant product properties
are listed in Table VI.

Example 7
[0027] Another sample of commercial kraft linerboard having a kappa number of 110 and Canadian
Standard Freeness of 750 mls was sized with 8% solutions of carboxy methyl cellulose
(Finn Fix). The size press pressure was adjusted to achieve 0.3 to 1.0% add-on by
weight. After heat treatment at 400°F (250°C) for 30 seconds, samples were conditioned
for 48 hours under standard conditions. The resultant properties are listed in Table
VII.

Example 8
[0028] , Board as in Example 7 was sized with 8% solutions of polyvinyl alcohol. The size
press pressure was adjusted to achieve the polymer add-on of 0.3 to 1.0% weight. After
heat treatment at 400°F (205°C) for 30 seconds, samples were conditioned for 48 hours
under standard conditions. The resultant properties are listed in Table VIII.

[0029] The tables above show clearly that great increases in wet strength, without substantial
degradation of other qualities, are produced by heat treatment of products having
certain additives as described above. A rewetting procedure may also be used, particularly
when folding endurance is important.
[0030] Inasmuch as the invention is subject to many variations and changes in detail the
foregoing description and examples should be regarded as illustrative of the invention
defined by the following claims.
1. A method of producing a paper product with improved stiffness, wet strength and
opacity and with acceptable flexibility thereof comprising the steps of
applying one or more additives selected from the group consisting of milk, latex,
polyvinyl alcohol, carboxy methyl cellulose, starch, and protein to said product,
and then
heat treating said product at high temperature for a period of time sufficient to
increase the wet strength thereof.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the product has an initial moisture content in the
range of 1.0 to 40% by weight before said heat treating step.
3. The method of claim 1 or 2, further comprising a step of rewetting the product
immediately after said heat treating step before the product cools substantially.
4. The method of claim 3, wherein the moisture content of said product after rewetting
is between 1.0 and 20% by weight.
5. The method of claims 1 to 4, wherein said heat treating step comprises heating
said product to within the range of 284 to 482°F (140 to 250°C), for a length of time
in the range of 0.5 to 120 seconds.
6. The method of claims 1 to 5, wherein said paper product is milk carton board.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein said carton board has basis weight of about 160
lb/3000 ft2 (260 g/m2).
8. A folding carton board of high stiffness and high folding endurance producible
with a method according to any of claims 1 to 7.
9. The method of claims 1 to 5, wherein said paper product is a linerboard.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein said linerboard has a basis weight of about 42
lb/1000 ft2 (205 g/m2).
11. A linerboard of high wet strength and high folding endurance, producible with
a method according to any of claims 1 to 7, 9 or 10.
12. A linerboard as in claim 11, having a wet strength of at least 15 lb/in (2.63
kN/m) and a folding endurance of at least 85% of the folding endurance of the board
prior to application of the heat treating and rewetting steps.