[0001] This invention relates to a condenser, and more particularly to a condenser for use
in an air conditioning or refrigeration system for condensing a refrigerant.
[0002] Many condensers employed in air conditioning or refrigeration systems at the present
time utilize one or more serpentine conduits on the vapour side. In order to prevent
the existence of an overly high pressure differential from the vapour inlet to the
outlet, which would necessarily increase system energy requirements, the flow passages
within such tubes are of relatively large size to avoid high resistance to the flow
of vapour and/or condensate. A condenser of this type is shown in US-A-2136641.
[0003] The large tube size of such condensers means that the air side of the tubes will
be relatively large in size. The relatively large size of the tubes on the air side
results in a relatively large portion of the frontal area of the air side being blocked
by the tube and less area available in which air side fins may be disposed to enhance
heat transfer.
[0004] As a consequence, to maintain a desired rate of heat transfer the air side pressure
drop will become undesirably large, and a commensurately undesirably large system
energy requirement in moving the necessary volume of air through the air side of the
condenser will result.
[0005] An alternative design of condenser for use in refrigeration apparatus is shown in
US-A-1958226. In this design a multiplicity of individual tubes extend in a matrix
arrangement between spaced apart headers. This design produces a heat exchanger which
is both bulky and heavy and is accordingly unsuitable for applications where a high
degree of efficiency (measured in terms of cooling capacity per unit volume or per
unit weight) is required.
[0006] The present invention is directed to overcoming the above problems.
[0007] In accordance with the present invention an air cooled condenser suitable for use
in a refrigeration or air conditioning system to condense a refrigerant vapour into
a refrigerant liquid, comprises a pair of spaced headers for receiving refrigerant
vapour and collecting condensed refrigerant; and a plurality of tubes extending in
hydraulic parallel between said headers, each tube being in fluid communication with
each said header and being elongate in transverse cross-section with the minor dimension
of the cross-section aligned substantially perpendicular to the direction of air flow
through the condenser is characterised in that each said tube defines a plurality
of discrete hydraulically parallel fluid flow paths, each said fluid flow path having
a hydraulic diameter in the range of 0.381 to 1.778mm (0.015 to 0.070 inches).
[0008] The preferred embodiment of the invention provides a condenser which has a lesser
frontal area on the air side that is blocked by tubes allowing an increase in the
air side heat exchange surface area without increasing air side pressure drop and
without increasing vapour and/or condensate side pressure drop.
[0009] In the preferred embodiment of the invention the tubes are flat tubes.
[0010] In a highly preferred embodiment, the plurality of flow paths in each tube are defined
by an undulating spacer contained within the tube.
[0011] Fins may be disposed on the exterior of the condenser tube and extend between the
exteriors of adjacent ones of the condenser tubes.
[0012] The headers may be defined by generally cylindrical tubes having facing openings,
such as slots, for receiving respective ends of the condenser tubes.
[0013] The invention will become apparent from the following specification, taken in connection
with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
FIGURE 1 is an exploded, perspective view of an embodiment of condenser made according
to the invention;
FIGURE 2 is a fragmentary, enlarged, cross-sectional view of a condenser tube that
may be employed in the invention;
FIGURE 3 is a graph of the predicted performance of condensers with the same face
area, some made in a prior art design and others made according to the invention,
plotting heat transfer against cavity (hydraulic) diameter;
FIGURE 4 is a graph comparing an embodiment of the present invention with a prior
art construction showing air flow through each versus (a) the rate of heat transfer,
(b) the refrigerant flow rate, and (c) the refrigerant pressure drop;
FIGURE 5 is a further graph comparing the prior art construction with a condenser
made according to the invention on the basis of air velocity versus the heat transfer
per unit mass of material employed in making up the core of each; and
FIGURE 6 is a further graph comparing the prior art construction with an embodiment
of the present invention by plotting air velocity versus pressure drop across the
air side of the condenser.
[0014] An exemplary embodiment of a condenser made according to the invention is illustrated
in Figure 1 and is seen to include opposed, spaced, generally parallel headers 10
and 12. Preferably, the headers 10 and 12 are made up from generally cylindrical tubing.
On their facing sides, they are provided with a series of generally parallel slots
or openings 14 for receipt of corresponding ends 16 and 18 of condenser tubes 20.
[0015] Preferably, between the slots 14, in the area shown at 22, each of the headers 10
and 12 is provided with a somewhat spherical dome to improve resistance to pressure
as explained more fully in US-A-4615385 the details of which are herein incorporated
by reference.
[0016] The header 10 has one end closed by a cap 24 brazed or welded thereto. Brazed or
welded to the opposite end is a fitting 26 to which a tube 28 may be connected.
[0017] The lower end of the header 12 is closed by a welded or brazed cap 30 similar to
the cap 24 while its upper end is provided with a welded or brazed in place fitting
32. Depending upon the orientation of the condenser, one of the fittings 26 and 32
serves as a vapour inlet while the other serves as a condensate outlet. For the orientation
shown in Figure 1, the fitting 26 will serve as a condensate outlet.
[0018] A plurality of the tubes 20 extend between the headers 10 and 12 and are in fluid
communication therewith. The tubes 20 are geometrically parallel to each other and
hydraulically in parallel as well. Disposed between adjacent ones of the tubes 20
are serpentine fins 34 although plate fins could be used if desired. Upper and lower
channels 36 and 38 extend between and are bonded by any suitable means to the headers
10 and 12 to provide rigidity to the system.
[0019] As can be seen in Figure 1, each of the tubes 20 is a flattened tube and within its
interior includes an undulating spacer 40.
[0020] In cross-section, the spacer 40 appears as shown in Figure 2 and it will be seen
that alternating crests are in contact along their entire length with the interior
wall 42 or the tube 20 and bonded thereto by fillets 44 of solder or braze metal.
As a consequence, a plurality of substantially discrete hydraulically parallel fluid
flow paths 46,48,50,52,54,56,58 and 60 are provided within each of the tubes 20. That
is to say, there is virtually no fluid communication from one of such flow paths to
the adjacent flow paths on each side. This effectively means that each of the walls
separating adjacent fluid flow paths 46,48,50,52,54,56,58 and 60 are bonded to both
of sides of the flattened tube 20 along their entire length. As a consequence, there
is no gap that would be filled by fluid with a lesser thermal conductivity. As a result,
heat transfer from the fluid via the walls separating the various fluid flow paths
identified previously to the exterior of the tube is maximized. In addition, it is
believed that discrete flow paths of the size mentioned take advantage of desirable
effects of heat transfer caused by surface tension phenomena.
[0021] A second advantage resides in the fact the condensers such as that of the present
invention are employed on the outlet side of a compressor and therefore are subjected
to extremely high pressure. Conventionally, this high pressure will be applied to
the interior of the tubes 20. Where so-called "plate" fins are utilized in lieu of
the serpentine fins 34 illustrated in the drawings, the same tend to confine the tubes
20 and support them against the internal pressure employed in a condenser application.
Conversely, serpentine fins such as those shown at 34 are incapable of supporting
the tubes 20 against substantial internal pressure. According to the described embodiment
of the invention, however, the desired support in a serpentine fin heat exchanger
is accomplished by the fact that the spacer 40 and the crests thereof are bonded along
its entire length to the interior wall 42 of each tube 20. This bond results in various
parts of the spacer 40 being placed in tension when the tube 20 is pressurized to
absorb the force resulting from internal pressure within the tube 20 tending to expand
the tube 20.
[0022] A highly preferred means by which the tubes 20 with accompanying inserts 40 may be
formed is disclosed in US-A-4688311 the details of which are also herein incorporated
by reference.
[0023] According to the invention, each of the flow paths 48,50,52,54,56 and 58 and to the
extent possible depending upon the shape of the insert 40, the flow paths 46 and 60
as well, have a hydraulic diameter in the range of about 0.381 to 1.778mm (0.015 to
0.070 inches). Given current assembly techniques known in the art, a hydraulic diameter
of approximately 0.889mm (0.035 inches) optimizes ultimate heat transfer efficiency
and ease of construction. Hydraulic diameter is as conventionally defined, namely,
the cross-sectional area of each of the flow paths multiplied by four and in turn
divided by the wetted perimeter of the corresponding flow path.
[0024] The values of hydraulic diameter given are for condensers in R-12 systems. Somewhat
different values might be expected in systems using a different refrigerant.
[0025] Within that range, it is desirable to make the tube dimension across the direction
of air flow through the core as small as possible. This in turn will provide more
frontal area in which fins, such as the fins 34, may be disposed in the core without
adversely increasing air side pressure drop to obtain a better rate of heat transfer.
In some instances, by minimizing tube width, one or more additional rows of the tubes
can be included.
[0026] In this connection, the preferred embodiment contemplates that tubes with separate
spacers such as illustrated in Figure 2 be employed as opposed to extruded tubes having
passages of the requisite hydraulic diameter. Current extrusion techniques that are
economically feasible at the present for large scale manufacture of condensers generally
result in a tube wall thickness that is greater than that required to support a given
pressure using a tube and spacer as disclosed herein. As a consequence, the overall
tube width of such extruded tubes is somewhat greater for a given hydraulic diameter
than a tube and spacer combination, which is undesirable for the reasons stated immediately
preceding. Nonetheless, the invention contemplates the use of extruded tubes having
passages with a hydraulic diameter within the stated range.
[0027] It is also desirable that the ratio of the outside tube periphery to the wetted periphery
within the tube be made as small as possible so long as the flow path does not become
sufficiently small that the refrigerant cannot readily pass therethrough. This will
lessen the resistance to heat transfer on the vapour and/or conduit side.
[0028] A number of advantages of the invention will be apparent from the data illustrated
in Figures 3-6 inclusive and from the following discussion. Figure 3 for example,
on the right-hand side, plots the heat transfer rate against the cavity or hydraulic
diameter at air flows varying from 12.74 to 90.61m
3 (450 to 3200 Standard Cubic Feet) per minute for production condenser cores made
by the applicant. Heat transfer rate is plotted in kW (thousands of BTU per hour)
and the hydraulic diameter is plotted in mm (inches).
[0029] The left of such data are computer generated curves based on a heat transfer model
for a core made according to the present invention, the model constructed using empirically
obtained data. Various points on the curves have been confirmed by actual tests. The
curves designated "A"represent heat transfer at the stated air flows for a core such
as shown in Figure 1 having a frontal area of 0.186m- (two square feet) utilizing
tubes approximately 0.61m (24 inches) long and having a 0.381mm (0.015 inch) tube
wall thickness, a 13.51mm (0.532 inch) tube major dimension, 43.3°C (110°F) inlet
air, 82.2°C (180°F) inlet temperature and 1.619 MPa (235 psig) pressure for R-12 and
assuming 1.1 degree C (2 degree F) of subcooling of the exiting refrigerant after
condensation. The core was provided with 18 fins per 25.4mm (inch) between tubes and
the fins were 15.88mm (0.625 inches) by 13.72mm (0.540 inches by 0.152mm (0.006 inches).
[0030] The curves designated "B" show the same relationship for an otherwise identical core
but wherein the length of the flow path in each tube was doubled i.e., the number
of tubes was halved and tube length was doubled. As can be appreciated from Figure
3, heat transfer is advantageously and substantially increased in the range of hydraulic
diameters of about 0.381 to 1.778mm (0.015 to 0.070 inches) through the use of the
invention with some variance depending upon air flow.
[0031] Turning now to Figure 4, actual test data for a core made according to the invention
and having the dimensions stated in Table 1 below is compared against actual test
data for a condenser core designated by the applicant as "1E2803". The data for the
conventional core is likewise listed in Table 1 below. In Figure 4: heat transfer
rate is plotted in kW (thousands of BTU per hour); air flow rate is plotted in m
3 (Standard Cubic Feet) per minute; refrigerant flow is plotted in kg (pounds) per
hour; and refrigerant pressure drop is plotted in kPa (PSI).
[0032] Both the core made according to the invention and the conventional core have the
same design point which is, as shown in Figure 4, a heat transfer rate of 7.62kW (26,000
BTU per hour) at an air flow of 50.97m
3 (1800 Standard Cubic Feet) per minute. The actual observed equivalence of the two
cores occurred at 8.21kW (28,000 BTU per hour) and 56.63m
3 (2,000 standard cubic feet) per minute; and those parameters may be utilized for
comparative purposes.
[0033] Viewing first the curves "D" and "E" for the prior art condenser and the subject
invention respectively it will be appreciated that refrigerant flow for either is
comparable over a wide range of air flow values. For this test, and those illustrated
elsewhere in Figures 4-6, R-12 was applied to the condenser inlet at 1.619MPa (235
psig) at 82.2°C (180°F). The exiting refrigerant was subcooled 1.1 degrees C (2 degrees
F). Inlet air temperature to the condenser was 43.3°C (110°F).
[0034] The greater refrigerant side pressure drop across a conventional core than that across
a core made according to the invention suggests a greater expenditure of energy by
the compressor in the conventional system than in the one made according to the subject
invention as well.
[0035] Curves "F" and "G", again for the prior art condenser and an embodiment of the condenser
of the subject invention, respectively, show comparable heat transfer rates over the
same range of air flows.
[0036] Curves "H" and "J" respectively for the conventional condenser and the condenser
of an embodiment of the subject invention illustrate a considerable difference in
the pressure drop of the refrigerant across the condenser. This demonstrates one advantage
of the invention. Because of the lesser pressure drop across the condenser when made
according to the invention, the average temperature of the refrigerant, whether in
vapour form or in the form of condensate will be higher than with the conventional
condenser. As a consequence, for the same inlet air temperature, a greater temperature
differential will exist which, according to Fourier's law, will enhance the rate of
heat transfer.
[0037] There will also be a lesser air side pressure drop in a core made according to an
embodiment of the invention than with the conventional core. This is due to two factors,
namely, the lesser depth of the core and the greater free flow area not blocked by
tubes; and such in turn will save on the fan energy required to direct the desired
air flow rate through the core. Yet, as shown by the curves "F" and "G" the heat transfer
rate remains essentially the same.
[0038] It has also been determined that a core made according to an embodiment of the invention,
when compared with the conventional core, holds less refrigerant. Thus, the core of
embodiment of the invention reduces the system requirement for refrigerant. Similarly,
there is lesser space required for installation of the inventive core because of its
lesser depth.
[0039] As can be seen from the table, and in consideration with the data shown in Figure
4, it will be appreciated that a core made according to the invention can be made
of considerably lesser weight than a conventional core. Thus, Figure 5 compares, at
various air velocities, the heat transfer rate per unit mass of core of the conventional
condenser (curve "K") versus heat transfer per unit mass of core of a condenser made
according to the invention (curve "L"). In Figure 5 heat transfer rate per unit mass
is plotted in W kg
-1 (BTU per pound) and air flow is plotted in m
3 (Standard Cubic Feet) per minute. Thus Figure 5 demonstrates a considerable weight
savings in a system may be obtained without sacrificing heat transferability by using
the core of the present invention.
TABLE 1
| CONDENSER CORE PHYSICAL PROPERTIES FOR FIGS. 4-6 |
| CORE PROPERTIES |
CURRENT PRODUCTION 1E2803 |
PRESENT INVENTION |
| Depth mm (in.) |
24.97 (.938) |
13.72 (.540) |
| Heights mm (in.) |
311.81 (12.276) |
304.8 (12.00) |
| Length mm (in.) |
612.90 (24.13) |
599.19 (23.259) |
| Face Area m2 (ft.2) |
0.191 (2.057) |
0.18 (1.938) |
| Weight kg (lbs.) |
2.577 (5.682) |
0.933 (2.057) |
Ratio

|
4.478 |
5.391 |
| |
| FIN PROPERTIES |
|
|
| Fins per 25.4mm |
12 |
18 |
| Fin Rows |
13 |
21 |
| Fin Thickness mm (in.) |
0.203 (.008) |
0.102(.004) |
| Fin Height mm (in.) |
19.06 (.7502) |
12.75 (.5018) |
| Free Flow Area m2 (ft.2) |
0.134 (1.444) |
0.144 (1.554) |
| Surface Area m2 (ft.2) |
3.45 (37.110) |
3.102 (33.389) |
| Hydraulic Diameter mm (in.) |
3.312 (.1304) |
2.311 (.0910) |
| Fin Weight kg (lbs.) |
0.981 (2.163) |
0.450 (.993) |
| |
| TUBE PROPERTIES |
|
|
| No. Circuits |
2 |
20 |
| Tube Rows |
14 |
20 |
| Tube Thickness mm (in.) |
4.75 (.187) |
1.91 (.075) |
| Tube Wall mm (in.) |
0.686 (.027) |
0.381 (.015) |
| Tube Length mm (ft.) |
385.27 (15.168) |
51.99 (2.047) |
| Free Flow Area mm2 (in.2) |
100.39 (.1556) |
206.45 (.3200) |
| Hydraulic Diameter mm (in.) |
2.0 (.07871) |
0.767 (.0302) |
| Outside Tube Surface m2 (ft.2) |
0.412 (4.431) |
0.325 (3.494) |
| Inside Tube Surface m2 (ft2) |
0.862 (9.276) |
0.636 (6.842) |
| Tube Weight kg (lbs.) |
1.596 (3.519) |
0.483 (1.064) |
[0040] Figure 6, in curve "M" thereon, illustrates the air side pressure drop, plotted in
Pa (inches of water), for a conventional core and for a core according to the invention
for various air flows plotted in m
3 (Standard Cubic Feet) per minute. Curve "N" illustrates the air side pressure drop
for the core of the present invention. It will be appreciated that the air side pressure
drop, and thus fan energy, is reduced when a core made according to the invention
is utilized.
1. An air cooled condenser suitable for use in a refrigeration or air conditioning system
to condense a refrigerant vapour into a refrigerant liquid, the condenser comprising
a pair of spaced headers (10,12) for receiving refrigerant vapour and collecting condensed
refrigerant; and a plurality of tubes (20) extending in hydraulic parallel between
said headers, each tube being in fluid communication with each said header and being
elongate in transverse cross-section with the minor dimension of the cross-section
aligned substantially perpendicular to the direction of air flow through the condenser,
characterised in that each said tube defines a plurality of discrete hydraulically
parallel fluid flow paths, each said fluid flow path having a hydraulic diameter in
the range of 0.381 to 1.778mm (0.015 to 0.070 inches).
2. A condenser according to claim 1 wherein said tubes are flattened tubes and the plurality
of flow paths in each tube is defined by an undulating spacer (40) contained within
the tube.
3. A condenser according to claim 1 or claim 2 further including fins (34) on the exteriors
of said condenser tubes.
4. A condenser according to any preceding claim including fins (34) extending between
the exteriors of adjacent ones of said condenser tubes.
5. A condenser according to any preceding claim wherein said headers are defined by generally
cylindrical tubes and have facing openings (14) for receiving respective ends 16,18)
of said condenser tubes.
6. A condenser according to claim 5 wherein said openings are a series of elongated slots
(14), the slots on one header tube facing the slots on the other header tube; and
wherein the condenser tubes are flattened tubes (20) having opposed ends (16,18) disposed
in corresponding ones of said slots.
1. Luftgekühlter Kondensator, der sich zum Einsatz in einem Kühl- oder Klimasystem zum
Kondensieren eines Kühlmitteldampfes zu einer Kühlmittelflüssigkeit eignet, wobei
der Kondensator ein Paar beabstandeter Sammelrohre (10,12) zur Aufnahme von Kühlmitteldampf
und zum Sammeln von kondensiertem Kühlmittel umfaßt; sowie eine Vielzahl von Röhren
(20), die hydraulisch parallel zwischen den Sammelrohren verlaufen, wobei jede Röhre
mit jedem der Sammelrohre in Fluidverbindung steht und im Querschnitt länglich ist,
wobei die kleinere Abmessung des Querschnitts im wesentlichen senkrecht zur Richtung
des Luftstroms durch den Kondensator ausgerichtet ist, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß jede der Röhren eine Vielzahl getrennter, hydraulisch paralleler Fluidströmungswege
aufweist, wobei jeder der Fluidströmungswege einen hydraulischen Durchmesser im Bereich
von 0,381 bis 1,778 mm (0,015 bis 0,071 inch) aufweist.
2. Kondensator nach Anspruch 1, wobei die Röhren abgeflachte Röhren sind und die Vielzahl
von Strömungswegen in jeder Röhre durch einen wellenförmigen Abstandhalter (40) gebildet
wird, der in der Röhre enthalten ist.
3. Kondensator nach Anspruch 1 oder Anspruch 2, der des weiteren Rippen (34) an den Außenseiten
der Kondensatorröhren enthält.
4. Kondensator nach einem der vorangehenden Ansprüche, der Rippen (34) enthält, die sich
zwischen den Außenseiten benachbarter Kondensatorröhren erstrecken.
5. Kondensator nach einem der vorangehenden Ansprüche, wobei die Sammelrohre durch im
allgemeinen zylindrische Röhren gebildet werden und einander zugewandte Öffnungen
(14) aufweisen, die entsprechende Enden (16, 18) der Kondensatorröhren aufnehmen.
6. Kondensator nach Anspruch 5, wobei die Öffnungen eine Reihe länglicher Schlitze (14)
sind, wobei die Schlitze an einem Sammelrohr den Schlitzen an dem anderen Sammelrohr
zugewandt sind; und wobei die Kondensatorröhren abgeflachte Röhren (20) mit einander
gegenüberliegenden Enden (16, 18) sind, die den Schlitzen entsprechend angeordnet
sind.
1. Condenseur refroidi par air qui peut être utilisé dans un système de réfrigération
ou de conditionnement d'air pour la condensation de vapeur d'un fluide réfrigérant
en un liquide réfrigérant, le condenseur comprenant deux collecteurs distants (10,
12) destinés à recevoir la vapeur du fluide réfrigérant et à collecter le fluide réfrigérant
condensé, et plusieurs tubes (20) disposés hydrauliquement en parallèle entre les
collecteurs, chaque tube communiquant avec chaque collecteur et étant allongé en direction
transversale avec une petite dimension en coupe alignée en direction pratiquement
perpendiculaire à la direction de la circulation de l'air dans le compresseur, caractérisé
en ce que chaque tube délimite plusieurs trajets séparés hydrauliquement et parallèles
de circulation de fluide, chaque trajet de circulation de fluide ayant un diamètre
hydraulique compris entre 0,381 et 1,778 mm (0,015 à 0,70 pouce).
2. Condenseur selon la revendication 1, dans lequel les tubes sont des tubes aplatis,
et les trajets de circulation de chaque tube sont délimités par une entretoise ondulée
(40) contenue dans le tube.
3. Condenseur selon la revendication 1 ou 2, comprenant en outre des ailettes (34) placées
à l'extérieur des tubes du condenseur.
4. Condenseur selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, comprenant des ailettes
(34) disposées entre les parties extérieures de tubes adjacents du condenseur.
5. Condenseur selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, dans lequel les
collecteurs sont délimités par des tubes de forme générale cylindrique et ayant des
ouvertures en regard (14) pour le logement des extrémités respectives (16, 18) des
tubes du condenseur.
6. Condenseur selon la revendication 5, dans lequel les ouvertures sont formées d'une
série de fentes allongées (14), les fentes d'un tube collecteur étant tournées vers
les fentes de l'autre tube collecteur, et les tubes du condenseur sont des tubes aplatis
(20) ayant des extrémités opposées (16, 18) disposées dans des fentes correspondantes.