BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0001] This invention is directed to an anti-fouling fuel composition and to a method for
using same. More specifically, the present invention is directed at a fuel composition
having particular applicability in minimizing and/or preventing fouling in gasoline
engines equipped with carburetors or with electronically controlled multiport fuel
injectors.
[0002] The use of detergents to prevent and/or minimize carbonaceous deposits in internal
combustion engines is well-known. The need for improved carburetor detergents has
been accentuated by recent changes to engines particularly for environmental considerations.
In conventional carburetor-equipped vehicles detergents have been added to the fuel
to minimize deposits, particularly on the throttle plate and throttle bore. Deposits
in these areas may lead to poor performance, rough idling, stalling, higher hydrocarbon
emissions and poor fuel economy.
[0003] One of the most significant improvements which has been made to automobile engines
in recent years has been the widespread use of fuel injection to improve the performance
and fuel economy of internal combustion engines. While carburetor-equipped internal
combustion engines admix the air and fuel for distribution through a manifold to
all of the cylinders, in a multi-port fuel injected engine the fuel is injected into
the manifold close to the intake valve of each cylinder for combustion. Fuel injection
systems are of two basic types, mechanically controlled and electronically controlled.
The early fuel injected engines were controlled mechanically, i.e., the operation
of each cylinder was controlled by fuel pressure. Recently, however, the use of electronically
controlled fuel injection engines has become increasingly widespread. In an electronically
controlled fuel injection system sensors disposed in the exhaust are employed to maintain
the air to fuel ratio within narrow limits. Electronically controlled fuel injection
systems offer the same performance and fuel economy benefits that would be achieved
with mechanically controlled fuel injection systems and also serve to more closely
regulate fuel-air mixtures to thereby enable the catalytic converter to oxidize carbon
monoxide and hydrocarbons to carbon dioxide and simultaneously to reduce nitrogen
oxides and thus meet emissions control legislation. Such legislation, imposing as
it did strict control of exhaust pollutants, utimately led to the development and
widespread application of new technologies.such as electronic fuel injection.
[0004] It has been found that the electronically controlled fuel injector systems have small
port openings which are prone to fouling by deposits. These deposits are.believed
to occur, at least in part, by gasoline and oil vapor, which is present in close proximity
to the injector tip, becoming baked onto the hot surfaces of the injector pintle and
on the surfaces of the annulus surrounding the pintle when the engine is shut off.
These deposits restrict the fuel flow to that particular cylinder. This, in turn,
causes a sensor disposed in the exhaust to detect a higher than desired oxygen to
fuel ratio. The sensor will attempt to correct this condition by increasing the amount
of fuel injected into all of the cylinders. This, in turn, will result in a lower
than desired oxygen to fuel ratio in the exhaust. The sensor then will attempt to
correct this by decreasing the amount of fuel injected in to each cylinder. This cyclical
adjustment of the oxygen to fuel ratio ranging between too lean a mixture and too
rich a mixture can at times result in poor operating performance of the vehicle. In
addition, close tolerances in this new type of injector and concurrently higher underhood
temperature also tend to enhance deposit formation resulting in poor vehicle driveability
and exhaust pollutant levels which exceed limits set by emissions control legislation.
[0005] It has been found that conventional gasoline detergents, which have proven effective
in preventing and/or eliminating carburetor deposits are not particularly effective
in removing and/or preventing deposit build-up that may occur in electronically controlled
fuel injection systems. Presently available methods for removing deposits from fuel
injector orifices typically comprise either mechanically cleaning the injectors or
the addition to the fuel of relatively large quantities. of particular additives.
Mechanical cleaning, which may involve either the complete removal of the injector
for manual deposit removal or the use of polar solvents for flushing the deposits
free, is not desired because of the relatively high cost and inconvenience. Currently
available additives are not particularly desirable because product recommendations
indicate they must be used at relatively high concentrations, i.e. about two to about
four thousand pounds per thousand barrels of fuel.
[0006] To be useful commercially a gasoline additive for reducing and/or preventing carburetor
and/or injector port fouling must be effective at low concen tration, must not significantly
affect the combustion characteristics of the fuel and must not foul the catalytic
converter catalyst.
[0007] The use of fatty acid polyamides in 2-cycle gasoline engines and in lubricants is
known. U.S. Patent No. 3,l69,980 discloses the use of polyamides as detergent compositions
for two cycle engines where the polyamide comprises

where R₁ contains 2 to 4 carbon atoms;
R₂ is hydrogen or an acyl group derived from a mixture of about 5 to about 30 mole
percent of straight-chain fatty acid and about 70 to about 95 mole percent of branched-chain
fatty acid, where the fatty acid contains from about l2 to about 30 carbon atoms
and n is an integer of from l to 5. The examples disclose the preparation of the polyamide
of tetraethylene pentamine utilizing a mixture of stearic acid and methyl branched
stearic acid. While the use of these compounds would be useful in keeping the carburetor
clean, there usually is not a concern about carburetor fouling, since the screws regulating
the air to fuel ratio are not sealed on a two cycle engine. In addition, two cycle
engines typically are not designed for high mileage-type applications. These additives
typically are added to the fuel at a rate of about 500 pounds per thousand barrels
(ptb). However, use of this high additive level in four cycle engines would not be
desirable based on economic and operational considerations.
[0008] U.S. Patent No. 3,ll0,673 discloses the use of the above-noted fatty acid polyamide
as a pour point depressant and as a detergent for lubricating oils.
[0009] U.S. Patent No. 3,897,224 is directed at an ashless dispersant for gasoline which
comprises an amide derived from an aliphatic polyamine and a high molecular weight
monocarboxylic acid. The monocarboxylic acid utilized has a molecular weight ranging
between about 600 and 3,000.
[0010] U.S. Patent No. 3,23l,348 is directed at the use of alkyl- and alkenyl-substituted
diethylene triamines to reduce or eliminate the formation of deposits in the fuel
induction system of an engine.
[0011] It is believed the use of fatty acid polyamides in gasoline at effective levels
may emulsify any water present unless a demulsifier is added.
[0012] Accordingly, it would be desirable to provide an additive package for gasoline which
will be effective in reducing and/or eliminating fouling without appreciable additive
losses or emulsification.
[0013] It also would be desirable to provide an additive package having a demulsifying agent
which is effective in the presence of both neutral and basic waters.
[0014] It also would be desirable to provide a gasoline additive package which is relatively
inexpensive and effective at low concentrations to reduce and/or eliminate carburetor
and/or injector fouling.
[0015] It also would be desirable to provide a gasoline additive package which is non-corrosive,
non-deleterious to the emissions catalyst, and does not affect the combustion characteristics
of the fuel.
[0016] It also would be desirable to provide a gasoline additive package which could be
easily added to the finished gasoline at any point during the storage and/or distribution
system.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0017] The present invention is directed at a fuel composition for minimizing and/or preventing
carburetor or injector fouling in a four cycle combustion engine. The composition
comprises:
A. gasoline
B. an anti-fouling agent having the formula:

wherein: R₁ is C₂-C₄
R₂ is hydrogen or R₃ -

where R₃ is hydrogen, alkyl, aryl, alkaryl or aralkyl; and n is an integer of l
to 5.
[0018] The present invention also is directed at a method for reducing and/or preventing
fouling of internal combustion engines, said method comprises delivering to said engine
a fuel comprised of an effective amount of an additive comprising

wherein: R₁ is C₂-C₄
R₂ is hydrogen or R₃ -

where R₃ is hydrogen, alkyl, aryl, alkaryl or aralkyl; and n is an integer of l
to 5.
[0019] The composition preferably further comprises a demulsifying agent. The anti-fouling
agent preferably is the condensation product of a fatty acid and an alkylene amine
where alkylene amine is selected from the group consisiting of diethylene triamine,
triethylene tetramine, tetraethylene pentamine, heptaethyleneoctamine, tetrapropylene
pentamine and hexabutylene heptamine. A particularly preferred composition comprises
the reaction product of methyl-branched or aromatic-branched stearic acid and tetraethylene
pentamine.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0020] The present invention is directed at a fuel composition including an anti-fouling
agent and a method for using same for reducing and/or preventing fouling of internal
combustion engines. The anti-fouling agent comprises an effective amount of a compound
having the formula

wherein: R₁ is C₂-C₄
R₂ is hydrogen or R₃ -

where R₃ is hydrogen, alkyl, aryl, alkaryl or aralkyl; and n is an integer of l
to 5. R₃ preferably is alkyl and more preferably is a substituted stearic acid.
[0021] Preferred anti-fouling agents comprise the condensation products of fatty acids and
polyamines where the fatty acids comprise C₁₂-C₃₀ fatty acids and the amines comprise
polyalkyleneamines, preferably where the alkylene groups are C₂ to C₄. Preferred fatty
acids comprise fatty acids with C₁-C₈ branches with C₁ to C₄ branches being particularly
preferred. Particularly preferred fatty acids are methyl-branched stearic acid, aryl
branched stearic acid and alkaryl-branched stearic acid. A particularly preferred
fatty acid is methyl-branched stearic acid. As used herein the term "methyl-branched
stearic acid" refers to a C₁₇ straight chain fatty acid having a methyl side chain.
The terms aryl-branched stearic acid and "alkaryl-branched stearic acid" refer to
C₁₈ straight chain fatty acids having aryl or alkaryl pendant groups, respectively.
Preferred polyalkylene amines comprise diethylene triamine, triethylene tetramine,
tetraethylene pentamine, hexaethylene heptamine, heptaethylene octamine, tetrapropylene
pentamine, and tetrabutylene heptamine. A particularly preferred anti-fouling agent
comprises the condensation product of methyl-branched stearic acid and tetraethylene
pentamine.
[0022] The ratio of the fatty acid to the amine typically may range between a mole ratio
of about l:l and about 4:l. A particularly preferred mole ratio when the reactants
comprise methyl-branched stearic acid and tetraethylene pentamine is about 3:l.
[0023] The concentration of the fatty acid polyamide may range between about 5 and about
50 ptb, preferably between about l0 and about 30 ptb, more preferably between about
l5 and about 25 ptb.
[0024] The condensation reaction of stearic acid and tetraethylene pentamine at a mole ratio
of 3:l may be represented as follows:

[0025] As used hereinafter, the term "isostearic acid" refers to-stearic acid which has
a pendant alkyl group irrespective of the exact position of the pendant group. A particularly
preferred stearic acid is a methyl-branched stearic acid, preferably branched at the
9 or l0 carbon atom. To prepare this condensation product, initially half of the
isostearic acid was charged to the reactor in order to obtain a level sufficient
to permit agitation and heat transfer. The tetraethylene pentamine then was added
slowly at ll0°C and the remaining acid was added. Then, the batch temperature was
raised slowly to drive the condensation reaction. Water of condensation was removed
through an overhead vapor removal system assisted by a nitrogen sparge. At a temperature
of approximately l60°C when most of the water had been removed, vacuum stripping was
applied and the reactor temperature was raised to 200°C to drive the condensation
reaction to completion. After the reaction had been driven to completion, the product
was cooled to l20°C and a small amount of water, i.e. about 2% by weight of the original
charge, was added to hydrolyze any resin lactone impurity in the isostearic acid.
This hydrolysis step also shifted the equilibrium to remove or eliminate any unreacted
primary amine. The excess water then was removed by nitrogen stripping at l20°C.
[0026] Bench scale and on-the-road tests were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of
the subject fatty acid polyamides in reducing and/or removing carburetor deposits
in internal combustion engines.
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE l
[0027] In this Comparative Example, commercially available detergents were added to gasoline
to determine if the detergents were effective in preventing carburetor deposits.
The test procedures utilized are set forth in the CRC "Research Technique for the
Study of Carburetor Cleanliness of Gasoline" SAE technical paper 83l708, by J. J.
Malakar, et al., the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. In this
test a 300 CID Ford six cylinder engine was specially tuned to accelerate carburetor
deposits. The engine was fitted with a carburetor with removable throttle plate and
throttle bore sleeves. The throttle plate and throttle bore sleeves were cleaned and
weighed at the start of the test. The engine was run for a total of 20 hours, cycling
between idle and middle cruise speed, utilizing a standard reference gasoline without
any detergent. Following this run, the throttle plate bore and sleeves were weighed,
rated and cleaned. The average values for the deposits and ratings of the throttle
plate and sleeve are presented in Table I. Additional tests indicated as tests A-E
were conducted utilizing various concentrations of commercially available additives
utilizing the same test procedure. At the end of the test, the throttle plate and
throttle bore sleeve were removed, rated and weighed. The rating of the sleeve and
throttle plates was determined by the method described the report "Carburetor Cleanliness
Test Procedure State of the Art Summary Report"; 1973-l98l Report No. 529 Coordinating
Research Council, Appendix C, April l983, the disclosure of which is incorporated
herein by reference. Utilizing this procedure, the sleeve and throttle plate were
rated on a scale of 0-l0 where a rating of l0 denoted a completely clean surface.
The results of these tests also are set forth in Table I.
EXAMPLE l
[0028] Varying concentrations of the fatty acid polyamide of isostearic acid and tetraethylene
pentamine (ISAT) were added to the base gasoline of Comparative Example l. The ISAT
was added as concentrate which also included a conventional corrosion inhibitor,
a demulsifier and solvent. The demulsifier comprised an alkylphenol-formaldehyde
resin and ethylene oxide-propylene oxide, where the alkylphenol was a nonylphenol.
The solvent comprised 5.68 wt.% 2-ethyl hexanol with the balance being Solvesso l00,
an aromatic hydrocarbon solvent. A summary of the composition of the adpack utilized
was as follows:

[0029] The same engine test procedures were utilized as set forth in Comparative Example
l. A summary of the engine test results for varying concentrations of this additive
also are set forth in Table I. From these test results it can be seen that the use
of the polyamide was effective in preventing carburetor deposits.

COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 2
[0030] These test procedures were designed to determine the effectiveness of various additives
in cleaning up fouled carburetors. The engine utilized was the same engine as Comparative
Example l. The carburetor throttle plate and the throttle bore sleeves were cleaned
at the start of the test. The engine was run for 20 hours on a detergent-free gasoline,
cycling between idle and medium cruise speed. At the end of this period, the carburetor
parts were visually rated and weighed. Then various commercially available additives
were added to the fuel. The test procedure then was repeated with 20 hours of driving,
cycling between idle and medium cruise speed at the end of the test, the throttle
plate and throttle bore were again removed, rated and weighed. The results of these
tests are presented in Table II.
EXAMPLE 2
[0031] The test procedures utilized in this example were similar to those of Comparative
Example 2 with the exception that the additive utilized was the condensation product
of isostearic acid and tetraethylene pentamine. The results of these tests also are
set forth in Table II.

[0032] From a review of the data of Tables I and II, it can be seen that the fatty acid
polyamide was effective in preventing and/or cleaning up carburetor deposits.
[0033] Fleet tests also were run to determine the utility of various detergents in preventing
and/or reducing carburetor deposits. In these tests, two techniques were used to assess
the performance of the carburetor detergents. Visual determinations were made of the
amount of deposits on each of the carburetors. In addition, emission measurements
prior to the catalytic converter, also were taken. Prior to the start of the tests,
each of the 24 vehicles to be utilized was driven an average of approximately 5,434
kilometers on a detergent-free base fuel, which had an RON of 94.6 and a MON of 85.4.
To this fuel were added 20 ptb of a standard detergent. These cars were run on this
fuel to provide a recent driving history on a common fuel. The carburetors of each
vehicle then were inspected and the emissions prior to the catalyst were measured.
The fleet was divided into four groups of six cars each to provide each group with
a representative range of degrees of carburetor fouling.
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 3
[0034] In this test, the vehicles were fueled with base fuel to which had been added either
7 ptb of Additive A or 20 ptb of Additive B, both commercially available detergent
additives. Additive A comprised an amine-amide carboxylate manufactured by DuPont
and sold under the trade name DMA-54. Additive B comprised another commercially available
detergent comprising a succinimide. The vehicles then were driven for l0,000 kilometers
over a l60 kilometer route that included about 33% city driving, 4% highway driving
and 63% suburban driving. The carburetors were removed, visually inspected and rated
at the end of the test. The emissions prior to the catalyst were measured at the start
of the test and also at the end of the test. These results are summarized in Table
III.
EXAMPLE 3
[0035] In this test, two six car fleets generally similar to those of Comparative Example
3 were utilized. The same detergent-free base fuel of Comparative Example 3 was used.
To the fuel of one six car fleet was added l0 ptb of the previous described fatty
acid polyamide and to the fuel of the other fleet was added 20 ptb of the fatty acid
polyamide. The vehicles were driven over the same route as in Comparative Example
3 for the same total driving distance. The degree of carburetor fouling was noted
and the emissions prior to the catalytic converter were measured. These results also
are set forth in Table III. From this table it also can be seen that the ISAT at 20
ptb improved overall carburetor ratings and also decreased emissions.

[0036] From a comparison of the data in Table III it can be seen that the fatty acid polyamide
at 20 ptb was particularly effective in cleaning up most areas of the carburetors.
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 4
[0037] In this Comparative Example, one of the two six car test fleets from Comparative
Example 3 was utilized with a conventional detergent at 7 ptb in the base fuel of
Comparative Example 3. The vehicle was driven for 5,000 kilometers over the same l60
kilometer route of Comparative Example 3. The results are presented in Table IV.
EXAMPLE 4
[0038] In this Example the same four six-car test fleets previously used were utilized in
this Example. The base fuel used in Comparative Example 3 and Comparative Example
4 was utilized here but with the addition of various additives. To one six car test
fleet was added 20 ptb of the fatty acid polyamide. To another six car test fleet
was added 20 ptb of the fatty acid polyamide and 7 ptb of the amine-amide carboxylate.
To the third six car test fleet was added 20 ptb of the fatty acid polyamide and 20
ptb of a succinimide. At the end of the test the carburetor ratings were determined
and the emissions prior to the catalytic converter were measured. The results of these
measurements are set forth in Table IV. From a review of data in Table IV, it can
be seen that the combination of 20 ptb of the fatty acid polyamide alone or in combination
with other carburetor detergents was effective in cleaning up carburetor deposits.

[0039] While the data described above discloses a utility of fatty acid polyamides as carburetor
detergents, these additives also are effective in preventing and/or reducing deposits
in multi-port fuel injection systems.
COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 5
[0040] In this Comparative Example, a multi-port fuel injected l985 Buick Somerset Regal
equipped with a 3 liter, 6 cylinder engine was used. The car was driven for approximately
l,0l9 miles using a regular grade 87 octane, detergent-free unleaded fuel with a new
set of injectors. The driving cycle employed to foul the injectors was normal commuter
use. Following the test, the injector fouling was measured by measuring the emissions
before the catalytic converter and by a pressure differential test. In this test,
the fuel rail was pressurized to 49 psig and each injector is pulsed individually
for 0.5 seconds. The difference in the pressure drop or leakdown between injectors
is a rough measure of the degree to which the injectors are obstructed, i.e. the greater
the numerical difference between the highest and lowest values, denoted as Δ P difference,
the greater the driveability problem. A summary of the results periodically up to
l,0l9 miles is set forth in Table V. Driveability of the vehicle was poor with emissions
and leakdown data confirming fouled injectors. A conventional carburetor detergent
then was added to the fuel at the 40 ptb level. The vehicle then was run for 37l miles
in normal commuter use. The emissions and the pressure differential during the test
are also presented in Table V. Throughout this period the driveability remained poor,
with emissions and leakdown data confirming fouled injectors. From a review of this
data, it can be seen that this conventional carburetor detergent did not clean-up
the fouled injectors.
EXAMPLE 5
[0041] In this Example, 20 ptb of the previously described fatty acid polyamide were added
to the same base fuel. The car of Comparative Example 5 having fouled injectors then
was driven for an additional 762 miles in normal commuter use. The emissions prior
to the catalytic converter and the pressure differential were measured periodically
As shown by the data presented in Table V, the use of the fatty acid polyamide detergent
resulted in a significant decrease in emissions over a relatively few miles of driving.
After 552 miles, the driveability improved to the point where the emissions, pressure
differential test and driveability all indicated that the injectors had been returned
substantially to "as new" condition. Generally confirmatory data also were obtained
at 762 miles. The difference between the highest and lowest values of the pressure
differentials also decreased, indicating decreased injector fouling.

COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE 6
[0042] In this Comparative Example three vehicles, two l986 Chrysler LeBarons (Vehicles
l and 2) with 2.2 liter turbocharged 4 cylinder fuel injected engines and one l985
Buick Park Avenue (Vehicle 3) equipped with a 3.8 liter 6 cylinder fuel injected engine
were tested. The emissions prior to the catalytic converter were measured after which
the cars were run on a detergent-free unleaded gasoline on a cycle designed to promote
injector fouling. The hydrocarbons prior to the catalytic converter again were measured
when the vehicles were judged to exhibit poor driveability. The vehicles were judged
to have CRC driveabilities of 400+ by a modified CRC Intermediate Temperature Durability
Test, Test No. 5l2, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. In
this test a new car typically has driveability ratings of below about 40 while ratings
above, l00 typically indicate severe driveability problems. This data is presented
in Table VI.
EXAMPLE 6
[0043] The three vehicles of Comparative Example 6 then were refueled with the same fuel
of Comparative 6, but with the further addition of about 25 ptb of ISAT. The vehicles
then were driven on the same driving cycle of Comparative Example 6 for the indicated
miles at which time the CRC driveability of each car had improved significantly. The
results also are tabulated in Table VI.

[0044] Typical fuels will comprise several additives including a demulsifier to minimize
any water pick-up, anti-rust agents, etc. A particularly preferred demulsifier comprises
a alkylphenol-formaldehyde resin ethylene oxide-propylene oxide.
[0045] The anti-fouling agent discussed hereinabove may be added to the fuel at any point
in the manufacturing or distribution process.
[0046] In this patent specification:
1 pound = 453.6 g
1 barrel = 159.0 liter
1 mile = 1.60935 km.
[0047] Gauge pressure in pounds per square inch gauge (psig) is converted to kPa equivalent
by multiplying by 6.895.
1. A fuel composition for a four cycle internal combustion engine, said fuel composition
comprising:
A. gasoline:
B. an anti-fouling agent which has the formula

wherein: R₁ is C₂-C₄
R₂ is hydrogen or R₃-

where R₃ is hydrogen, alkyl, aryl, alkaryl or aralkyl; and n is an integer of 1 to
5, or which is a condensation product of a branched C₁₂ to C₃₀ carboxylic acid and
an alkylene amine.
2. The fuel composition of claim 1 wherein R₃ comprises an alkyl.
3. The composition of claim 2 wherein R₃ or the branched carboxylic acid is stearic
acid or substituted stearic acid.
4. The composition of any one of claims 1 to 3 comprising demulsifier.
5. The fuel composition of any one of claims 1 to 4 wherein the alkylene amine is
selected from diethylene, triamine, triethylene tetramine, tetraethylene pentamine,
hexaethylene heptamine heptaethylene octamine, tetrapropylene pentamine and hexabutylene
heptamine.
6. The fuel composition of claim 5 wherein the alkyleneamine comprises tetraethylene
pentamine.
7. A method for reducing and/or preventing fouling of an internal combustion engine,
said method comprising delivering to said engine a fuel composition according to any
one of claims 1 to 6.
8. A method as in claim 7 wherein the engine comprises a multi-port, electronically
controlled fuel injection system.
9. A method as in claim 7 wherein the engine comprises a carburetor.