BACKGROUND OF INVENTION
1. Field of Invention
[0001] This invention relates to glassy metal alloys with Perminvar characteristics that
is constant permeabilities at low magnetic field excitations and constricted hysteresis
loops. More particularly, this invention provides glassy metal alloys with highly
non-linear magnetic properties at low magnetic excitation levels.
2. Description of Prior Art
[0002] The magnetic response, namely magnetic induction caused by magnetic excitation, of
a typical ferromagnet, is non-linear characterized by a hysteresis loop. This loop
usually does not allow a relatively constant permeability near the zero-excitation
point. To realize such a feature, so-called Perminvar alloys were developed [see,
for example, R. M. Bozorth, Ferromagnetism (Van Nostrand, Co., Inc., New York, 1951)
p. 166-180]. These alloys are usually based on crystalline iron-cobalt-nickel system.
Typical compositions (weight percent) include 20%Fe-60%Co-20%Ni (20-60 Perminvar)
and 30%Fe-25%Co-45%Ni (45-45 Perminvar). Improvements of the crystalline Perminvar
alloys have been made. Of significance is the addition of molybdenum, as exemplified
by the synthesis of 7.5-45-25 Mo-Perminvar (7.5%Mo-45%Ni-25%Co-22.5%Fe). This material,
when furnace cooled from 1110°C, exhibited a dc coercivity (H
c) of 40 A/m (=0.5 Oe), initial permeability ( p
o) of 100 and the remanence (B
r) of 0.75 T.
[0003] In the advent of modern electronics technology, it becomes necessary to further improve
the Perminvar-like properties. For example, further reduction H
c and increase of po would be desirable when an efficient transformer requiring low
field modulations is needed. Furthermore, the usual non-linear characteristic of the
conventional Perminvar alloys cannot be utilized without a large level of excitation
of well above 80 A/m (=
1 Oe). Also desirable in many applications are low ac magnetic losses. One approach
to attain these excellent soft magnetic properties is to reduce the materials' magnetostriction
values as low as possible.
[0004] Saturation magnetostriction as is related to the fractional change in length Δℓ/ℓ
that occurs in a magnetic material on going from the demagnetized to the saturated,
ferromagnetic state. The value of magnetostriction, a dimensionless quantity, is often
given in units of microstrains (i.e., a microstrain is a fractional change in length
of one part per million).
[0005] Ferromagnetic alloys of low magnetostriction are desirable for several interrelated
reasons:
1. Soft magnetic properties (low coercivity, high permeability) are generally obtained
when both the saturation magnetostriction λs and the magnetocrystalline anisotropy
K approach zero. Therefore, given the same anisotropy, alloys of lower magnetostriction
will show lower dc coercivities and higher permeabilities. Such alloys are suitable
for various soft magnetic applications.
2. Magnetic properties of such zero magnetostrictive materials are insensitive to
mechanical strains. When this is the case, there is little need for stress-relief
annealing after winding, punching or other physical handling needed to form a device
from such material. In contrast, magnetic properties of stress-sensitive materials,
such as the crystalline alloys, are seriously degraded by such cold working and such
materials must be carefully annealed.
3. The low dc coercivity of zero magnetostrictive materials carries over to ac operating
conditions where again low coercivity and high permeability are realized (provided
the magnetocrystalline anisotropy is not too large and the resistivity not too small).
Also because energy is not lost to mechanical vibrations when the saturation maganetostriction
is zero, the core loss of zero magnetostrictive materials can be quite low. Thus,
zero magnetostrictive magnetic alloys (of moderate or low magnetocrystalline anisotropy)
are useful where low loss and high ac permeability are required. Such applications
include a variety of tape-wound and laminated core devices, such as power transformers,
signal transformers, magnetic recording heads and the like.
4. Finally, electromagnetic devices containing zero magnetostrictive materials generate
no acoustic noise under AC excitation. While this is the reason for the lower core
loss mentioned above, it is also a desirable characteristic in itself because it eliminates
the hum inherent in many electromagnetic devices.
[0006] There are three well-known crystalline alloys of zero magnetostriction (in atom percent,
unless otherwise indicated):
(1) Nickel-iron alloys containing approximately 80% nickel ("80 nickel permalloys");
(2) Cobalt-iron alloys containing approximately 90% cobalt; and
(3) Iron-silicon alloys containing approximately 6 wt. % silicon.
[0007] Also included in these categories are zero magnetostrictive alloys based on the binaries
but with small additions of other elements such as molybdenum, copper or aluminum
to provide specific property changes. These include, for example, 4% Mo, 79% Ni, 17%
Fe (sold under the designation Moly Permalloy) for increased resistivity and permeability;
permalloy plus varying amounts of copper (sold under the designation Mumetal) for
magnetic softness and improved ductility; and 85 wt. % Fe, 9 wt. % Si, 6 wt. % Al
(sold under the designation Sendust) for zero anisotropy.
[0008] The alloys included in category (1) are the most widely used of the three classes
listed above because they combine zero magnetostriction with low anisotropy and are,
therefore, extremely soft magnetically; that is they have a low coercivity, a high
permeability and a low core loss. These permalloys are also relatively soft mechanically
and their excellent magnetic properties, achieved by high temperature (above 1000°C)
anneal, tend to be degraded by relatively mild mechanical shock.
[0009] Category (2) alloys such as those based on C0
90Fe
lo have a much higher saturation induction (B
s about 1.9 Tesla) than the permalloys. However, they also have a strong negative magnetocrystalline
anisotropy, which prevents them from being good soft magnetic materials. For example,
the initial permeability of Co
90Fe
10 is only about 100 to 200.
[0010] Category (3) alloys such as Fe-6 wt% Si and the related ternary alloy Sendust (mentioned
above) also show higher saturation inductions (B
s about 1.8 Tesla and 1.1 Tesla, respectively) than the permalloys. However these alloys
are extremely brittle and have, therefore, found limited use in powder form only.
Recently both Fe-6.5 wt. % Si [IEEE Trans. MAG-16, 728 (1980)] and Sendust alloys
[IEEE Trans. MAG-15, 1149 (1970)] have been made relatively ductile by rapid solidification.
However, compositional dependence of the magnetostriction is very strong in these
materials, making difficult precise tayloring of the alloy composition to achieve
near-zero maganetostriction.
[0011] It is known that magnetocrystalline anisotropy is effectively eliminated in the glassy
state. It is therefore, desirable to seek glassy metal alloys of zero magnetostriction.
Such alloys might be found near the compositions listed above. Because of the presence
of metalloids which tend to reduce the magnetization by dilution and electronic hybridization,
however, glassy metal alloys based on the 80 nickel permalloys are either non-magnetic
at room temperature or have unacceptably low saturation inductions. For example, the
glassy alloy Fe
40Ni
40P
14B
6 (the subscripts are in atom percent) has a saturation induction of about 0.8 Tesla,
while the glassy alloy Ni
49Fe
29P
14B
6Si
2 has a saturation induction of about 0.46 Tesla and the glassy alloy
Ni
80P20 is non-magnetic. No glassy metal alloys having a saturation magnetostriction approximately
equal . to zero have yet been found near the iron-rich Sendust composition. A number
of near-zero magnetostrictive glassy metal alloys based on the Co-Fe crystalline alloy
mentioned above in (2) have been reported in the literature. These are, for example,
Co
72Fe
3P
16B
6Al
3 (AIP Conference Proceedings, No. 24, pp. 745-746 (1975)) Co
70.5Fe
4.5Si
15B
10 Vol. 14, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, pp. 1077-1078 (1975)) Co
31.2Fe
7.8Ni
39.0B
14Si
8 [proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Rapidly Quenched Metals,
p. 183, (1979)] and C0
74Fe
6B
20 [IEEE Trans. MAG-12, 942 (1976)]. However, none of the above- mentioned near-zero
magnetostrictive materials show Perminvar-like characteristics. By polishing the surface
of a low magnetostrictive glassy ribbon, a surface uniaxial anisotrpy was introduced
along the polishing direction which resulted in observation of Perminvar-like Kerr
hysteresis loops (Applied Physics Letters, vol. 36, pp. 339-341 (1980). This is only
a surface effect and is not of a bulk property of the material, limiting the use of
such effect in some selected devices.
[0012] Furthermore, to realize the Perminvar properties, the crystalline materials mentioned-above
have to be baked for a long time at a given temperature. Typically the heat-rtreatment
is performed at 425°C for 24 hours. Obviously it is desirable to heat-treat the materials
at a temperature as low as possible and for a duration as short as possible.
[0013] Clearly desirable are new magnetic materials with various Perminvar characteristics
which are suited for modern electronics technology.
SUMMARY OF INVENTION
[0014] In accordance with the invention, there is provided a magnetic alloy that is at least
70% glassy and which has a low magnetostriction and Perminvar characteristics of relatively
constant permeability at low magnetic field excitations and a constricted hysteresis
loop in addition to excellent soft magnetic properties. The glassy metal alloy has
the composition Co
aFe
bNi
cM
dB
eSi
f where M is at least one number selected from the group consisting of Cr, Mo, Mn and
Nb, "a-f are in atom percent and the sum of "a-f" equals 100, "a" ranges from about
66 to 71, "b" ranges from about 2.5 to 4.5, "c" ranges from about 0 to 3, "d" ranges
from about 0 to 2 except when M=Mn in which case "d" ranges from about 0 to 4, "e"
ranges from about 6 to 24 and "f" ranges from about 0 to 19, with the proviso that
the sum of "a", "b", and "c" ranges from about 72 to 76 and the sum of "e" and "f"
ranges from about 25 to 27. The glassy alloy has a value of magnetostriction ranging
from about - 1×10
-6 to + 1x10
-6, a saturation induction ranging from about 0.5 to 1 Tesla, a Curie temperature ranging
from about 200 to 450°C and a first crystallization temperature ranging from about
440 to 570°C. The glassy alloy is heat-treated by heating it to a temperature between
about 50 and 110°C below its first crystallization temperature for a time period ranging
from 15 to 180 min., and then cooling the alloy at a rate slower than about - 60°C/min.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
[0015] The invention will be more fully understood and further advantages will become apparent
when reference is made to the following detailed description of the invention and
the accompanying drawing, which is a graph depicting the B-H characteristics of an
alloy of the present invention, the alloy having been annealed for fifteen minutes
at the temperatures (A) 460°C, (B) 480°C and (C) 500°C.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0016] The glassy alloy is heat-treated at a temperature
Ta for a duration of time t
a, where AT
c-a
= (T
cl-T
a) is between 50 and about 110°C; and t
a is between about 15 and 120 minutes, followed by cooling of the material at a rate
slower than about -60°C/min. The choice of T
a and t
a should exclude the case that ΔT
c-a ~ 50°C and t
a > 15 minutes because such combination sometimes results in crystallization of the
glassy alloy.
[0017] The purity of the above composition is that found in normal commercial practice.
However, it would be appreciated that the metal M in the alloys of the invention may
be replaced by at least one other element such as vanadium, tungsten, tantalum, titanium,
zirconium and hafnium, and up to about 4 atom percent of Si may be replaced by carbon,
aluminum or germanium without significantly degrading the desirable magnetic properties
of these alloys.
[0018] Examples of near-zero magnetostrictive glassy metal alloys of the invention include
Co
70.5Fe
4.5B
15Si
10, Co
69.0Fe
4.1Ni
1.4Mo
1.5B
12Si
12, Co
65.7Fe
4.4Ni
2.9Mo
2B
11Si
14, Co
69.2Fe
3.8Mo
2B
8Si
17, Co
67.5Fe
4.5Ni
3.0B
8Si
17, Co
70.9Fe
4.1B
8Si
17, Co
69.9Fe
4.1Mn
1.0B
8Si
17, Co
69.0Fe
4.0Mn
2B
8Si
17, Co
68.0Fe
4.0Mn
3B
8Si
17, Co
67.1Fe
3.9Mn
4B
8Si
17, Co
68.0Fe
4.0Mn
2Cr
1B
8Si
17, Co
69.0Fe
4.0Cr
2B
8Si
17, Co
69.0Fe
4.0Nb
2B
8Si
17, Co
68.2Fe
3.8Mn
1B
12Si
15, Co
67.7Fe
3.3Mn
2B
12Si
15, Co
67.8Fe
4.2Mo
1B
12Si
15, Co
67.8Fe
4.2Cr
1B
12Si
15, Co
67.0Fe
4.0Cr
2B
12Si
15, Co
66.1Fe
3.9Cr
3B
12Si
15,Co
68.5Fe
2.5Mn
4B
10Si
15, Co
65.7Fe
4.4Ni
2.9Mo
2B
23C
2 and Co68.6Fe4.4M°2Ge4B21. These alloys possess saturation induction (B
s) between 0.5 and 1 Tesla, Curie temperature between 200 and 450°C and excellent ductility.
Some magnetic and thermal properties of these and some of other near-zero magnetostrictive
alloys of the present invention are listed in Table I.
[0019]

[0020] Figure 1 illustrates the B(induction)-H(applied field) hysteresis loops for a near-zero
magnetostrictive Co
67.8Fe
4.2Cr
1B
12Si
15 glassy alloy heat-treated at T
a = 460°C (A), T
a = 480°C (B) and T
a = 500°C (C) for 15 minutes, followed by cooling at a rate of about -5°C/min. The
constricted B-H loops of Figs 1B and 1C are characteristic of the materials with Perminvar-like
properties, whereas the B-H loop of Fig. 1A corresponds to that of a typical soft
ferromagnet. As evidenced in Figure 1, the choice of the heat-treatment temperature
T
a is very important in obtaining the Perminvar characteristics in the glassy alloys
of the peresent invention. Table II summarizes the heat-treatment conditions for some
of these alloys and some of the resultant magnetic properties.

[0021] This table teaches the importance of the quantity ΔT
c-a being between about 50 and 110°C and relatively slow cooling rates after the heat-treatments
at temperature T
a and for the duration t
a. It is also noted that µ
o values are higher and the H
c values are lower than those of prior art materials. For example, a properly heat-treated
(T
a = 460°C; t
a = 15 min.) C
067.8Fe
4.2Cr
lB
12Si
15 glassy alloy exhibits µ
o = 50,000 and H
c = 0.2 A/m whereas one of the improved prior art alloy, namely 7.5-45-25 Mo-Perminvar,
gives µ
o = 100 and H
c = 40 A/m when furnace cooled from 1100°C and gives µ
o = 3,500 when quenched from 600°C.
[0022] In many magnetic applications, lower magnetostriction is desirable. For some applications,
however, it may be desirable or acceptable to use materials with a small positive
or negative magnetostriction. Such near-zero magnetostrictive glassy metal alloys
are obtained for "a", "b", "c" in the ranges of about 66 to 71, 2.5 to 4.5 and 0 to
3 atom percent respectively, with the proviso that the sum of "a", "b", and "c" ranges
between 72 and 76 atom percent. The absolute value of saturation magnetostriction
|λs| of these glassy alloys is less than about 1×10
-6 (i.e. the saturation magnetostriction ranges from about -1x10
-6 to +1x10
-6 or from -1 to +1 microstrains).
[0023] The glassy alloys of the invention are conveniently prepared by techniques readily
available elsewhere; see e.g. US Patent No. 3,845,805 issued November 5, 1974 and
No. 3,856,513 issued December 24, 1974. In general, the glassy alloys, in the form
of continuous ribbon, wire, etc., are rapidly quenched from a melt of the desired
composition at a rate of at least about 10
5 K/sec.
[0024] A metalloid content of boron and silicon in the range of about 25 to 27 atom percent
of the total alloy composition is sufficient for glass formation with boron ranging
from about 6 to 24 atom percent. It is prefered, however, that the content of metal
M, i.e. the quantity "d" does not exceed very much from about 2 atom percent except
when M=Mn to maintain a reasonably high Curie temperature (> 200°C).
[0025] In addition to the highly non-linear nature of the glassy Perminvar alloys of the
present invention, these alloys exhibit high permeabilities and low core loss at high
frequencies. Some examples of these features are given in Table III.
Table III
[0026] Core loss (L) and impedance permeability ( p) at f=50 kHz and induction level of
0.1 Tesla for some of the glassy Perminvar-like alloys of the present invention. T
a and t
a are heat-treatment temperature and time. Cooling after the heat-treatment is about
-5°C/min., unless otherwise stated.

EXAMPLES
1. Sample Preparation
[0027] The glassy alloys listed in Tables I-III were rapidly quenched (about 10
6 K/sec) from the melt following the techniques taught by Chen and Polk in U.S. Patent
3,856,513. The resulting ribbons, typically 25 to 30 µm thick and 0.5 to 2.5 cm wide,
were determined to be free of significant crystallinity by X-ray diffractometry (using
CuK radiation) and scanning calorimetry. Ribbons of the glassy metal alloys were strong,
shiny, hard and ductile.
2. Magnetic Measurements
[0028] Continuous ribbons of the glassy metal alloys prepared in accordance with the procedure
described in Example I were wound onto bobbins (3.8 cm O.D.) to form closed-magnetic-path
toroidal samples. Each sample contained from 1 to 3 g of ribbon. Insulated primary
and secondary windings (numbering at least 10 each) were applied to the toroids. These
samples were used to obtain hysteresis loops (coercivity and remanence) and initial
permeability with a commercial curve tracer and core loss (IEEE Standard 106-1972).
[0029] The saturation magnetization, M
s, of each sample, was measured with a commercial vibrating sample magnetometer (Princeton
Applied Research). In this case, the ribbon was cut into several small squares (approximately
2 mm x 2 mm). These were randomly oriented about their normal direction, their plane
being parallel to the applied field (0 to 720 kA/m. The saturation induction B
s (=4πM
SD) was then calculated by using the measured mass density D.
[0030] The ferromagnetic Curie temperature ( θ
f) was measured by inductance method and also monitored by differential scanning calorimetry,
which was used primarily to determine the crystallization temperatures.
[0031] Magnetostriction measurements employed metallic strain gauges (BLH Electronics),
which were bonded (Eastman - 910 Cement) between two short lengths of ribbon. The
ribbon axis and gauge axis were parallel. The magnetostriction was determined as a
function of applied field from the longitudinal strain in the parallel ( Δℓ/ ℓ) and
perpendicular ( A ℓ/ℓ) in- plain fields, according to the formula λ = 2/3 [(Δℓ/ℓ)
- ( Δℓ/ℓ)
[0032] Having thus described the invention in rather full detail, it will be understood
that this detail need not be strictly adhered to but that further changes and modifications
may suggest themselves to one skilled in the art, all falling within the scope of
the invention as defined by the subjoined claims.
1. A magnetic alloy that is at least 70% glassy, having the formula CoaFebNicMdBeSif, where M is at least one number selected from the group consisting of Cr, Mo, Mn
and Nb, "a" - "f" are in atom percent and the sums of "a" - "f" equals 100, "a" ranges
from about 66 to 71, "b" ranges from about 2.5 to 4.5, "c" ranges from about 0 to
3, "d" ranges from about 0 to 4, "e" ranges from about 6 to 24 and "f" ranges from
about 0 to 19, with the proviso that the sum of "a", "b" and "c" ranges from about
72 to 76 and the sum of "e" and "f" ranges from about 25 to 27, said alloy having
a value of magnetostriction between - lxlO-6 and + 1x10-6.
2. The magnetic alloy of claim 1, said alloy having been heat-treated by heating the
alloy to a temperature between 50 and 110°C below the first crystallization temperature
thereof for a time period ranging from about 15 to 180 minutes, and then cooling the
alloy at a rate slower than about - 60°C/men.
3. The magnetic alloy of claim 2 has Perminvar characteristics of a relatively constant
permeability at low magnetic excitation and a constricted hysteresis loop.
4. The magnetic alloy of claim 3 having the formula Co70.5Fe4.5R15Si10.
5. The magnetic alloy of claim 3 having the formula Co69.7Fe4.1Ni1.4Mo1.5B12Si12.
6. The magnetic alloy of claim 3 having the formula Co65.7Fe4.4Ni2.9Mo2R11Si14.
7. The magnetic alloy of claim 3 having the formula Co68.2Fe3.8Mn1R12Si15.
8. The magnetic alloy of claim 3 having the formula Co67.7Fe3.3Mn2R12Si15.
9. The magnetic alloy of claim 3 having the formula Co67.8Fe4.2Mo1B12Si15.
10. The magnetic alloy of claim 3 having a formula selected from the group consisting
of Co67.8Fe4.2Cr1B12Si15, Co69.2Fe3.8Mo2R8Si17, Co67.5Fe4.5Ni3.0B8Si17, Co70.9Fe4.1B8Si17, Co69.9Fe4.1Mn1.0B8Si17, Co69.0Fe4.0Mn2B8Si17, Co68.0Fe4.0Mn3B8Si17, Co67.1Fe3.9Mn4B8Si17, Co69.0Fe4.0Cr2B8Si17, Co68.0Fe4.0Mn2Cr1B8Si17, Co69.0Fe4.0Nb2Si17, Co67.0Fe4.0Cr2B12Si15, Co66.1Fe3.9Cr3B12Si15, Co68.5Fe2.5Mn4B10Si15, Co65.7Fe4.4Ni2.9Mo2B23C2 and CO68.6Fe4.4Mo2Ge4B21.