[0001] This invention relates to electrostatic printing and photocopying, particularly at
high speeds.
[0002] Electrostatic printers and photocopiers share a number of common features as a rule,
although they carry out different processes. Electrostatic printers and photocopiers
which are capable of producing an image on plain paper may generally be contrasted
in terms of the method and apparatus used to create a latent electrostatic image on
an intermediate member.
[0003] Copiers generally do so by uniformly charging a photoconductor electrostatically
in the dark, and optically exposing the charged photoconductor to an image corresponding
to the image to be reproduced. Electrostatic printers use non-optical means to create
a latent electrostatic image on a dielectric surface, in response to a signal indicative
of an image to be created. In theory, after creation of the electrostatic latent image,
the same apparatus could be used to carry out the common steps of toning the image,
transferring it to plain paper, and preparing the member bearing the electrostatic
latent image for a subsequent cycle, usually by erasure of a residual latent electrostatic
image. It would, in fact, be desirable to standardise the apparatus to perform these
functions.
[0004] Various toner image transfer methods are known in the art. The transfer may be accomplished
electrostatically, by means of a charge of opposite polarity to the charge on the
toner particles, the former charge being used to draw the toner particles off the
dielectric member and onto the image receptor. Patents illustrative of this transfer
method include US-A-2,944,147; US-A-3,023,731; and US-A-3,715,762. Alternatively,
the image receptor medium may be passed between the toner-bearing dielectric member
and a transfer member, and the toner image transferred by means of pressure at the
point of contact. Patents illustrative of this method include US-A-3,701,966; US-A-3,907,560;
and US-A-3,937,571. Usually, the toner image is fused to the image receptor subsequently
to transfer of the image, at a further process station. Postfusing may be accomplished
by pressure, as in US-A-3,874,894, or by exposure of the toner particles to heat,
as in US-A-3,023,731 and US reissue patent 28,693.
[0005] It is possible, however, to accomplish transfer and fusing of the image simultaneously,
as shown for example in the patents cited above as illustrative of pressure transfer.
This may be accomplished by a heated roller, as in US reissue patent 28,693, or simply
by means of high pressure between the image-bearing dielectric member and a transfer
member, between which the image receptor passes.
[0006] A problem which is typically encountered in transferring a toner image solely by
means of pressure is the existence of a residual toner image on the dielectric member
after image transfer, due to inefficiences in toner transfer. The residual toner particles
require scraper blades or other removal means, and accumulate over time at various
process stations associated with the dielectric member, including the apparatus for
forming the latent electrostatic image. These toner accumulations decrease the reliability
of the appratus, necessitating service at intervals. Furthermore, inefficiences in
toner transfer may lead to mottling of the images formed on the image receptor sheets.
These problems have not been overcome in the prior art through the use of extremely
high pressures at the transfer nip.
[0007] A phenomenon which is commonly observed when subjecting rollers to high pressures
is that of "bowing" of the rollers. This phenomenon occurs when the rollers are subjected
to a high compressive force at the ends, thereby imparting a camber to each roller.
The effect is to have high pressure at the ends of the rollers but lower pressure
at the center. It is known in the prior art to alleviate this problem when encountered
in pressure fusing apparatus by skewing the pressure rollers, i.e. by adjusting the
mounting of the rollers to create an oblique orientation of the roller axes. Representative
United States patents include US-A-3,990,391; US-A-4,188,104; US-A-4,192,229; and
US-A-4,200,389. This technique has the disadvantage of causing "walking" of a receptor
sheet fed between the rolls. In addition, this apparatus commonly encounters the problem
of wrinkling of the receptor sheets.
[0008] Hardcoat anodization of aluminum alloys is an electrolytic process which is used
to produce thick oxide coatings with substantial hardness. Such coatings are to be
distinguished from natural films of oxide which are normally present on aluminum surfaces
and from thin, electrolytically formed barrier coatings.
[0009] The anodization of aluminum to form thick dielectric coatings takes place in an electrolytic
bath containing an oxide such a sulfuric or oxalic acid, in which aluminum oxide is
slightly soluble. The production techniques, properties, applications of these aluminum
oxide coatings are described in detail in
The Surface Treatment and Finishing of Aluminum and Its Alloys by S. Wernick and R. Pinner, fourth edition, 1972, published by Robert Draper Ltd.,
Paddington, England (chapter IX page 563). Such coatings are extremely hard and mechanically
superior to uncoated aluminum. However, the coatings contain pores in the form of
fine tubes with a porosity on the order of 6.4516 x 10¹⁴ to 6.4516 x 10¹⁶ pores per
square meter (10¹⁰ to 10¹² pores per square inch). Typical porosities range from 10
to 30 percent by volume. These pores extend through the coating to a very thin barrier
layer of aluminium oxide, typically 3 x 10⁻⁸ to 8 x 10⁻⁸m (300 to 800 Angstroms).
[0010] US-A-3,664,300 discloses a process for surface treatment of xerographic imaging cylinders
wherein the surface is coated with zinc stearate to provide enhanced surface lubrication
and improved electrostatic toner transfer. This treatment technique does not, however,
result in a permanent dielectric surface of requisite hardness and smoothness for
pressure transfer and fusing of a toner image. For improved mechanical properties
as well as to prevent staining, it is customary practice to seal the pores. One standard
sealing technique involves partially hydrating the oxide through immersion in boiling
water, usually containing certain nickel salts, which form an expanded boehmite structure
at the mouth of the pores. Oxide sealing in this manner will not support an electrostatic
charge due to the ionic conductivity of moisture trapped in the pores.
[0011] The invention provides compatibility of design for electrostatic printing and photocopying
apparatus. It also provides high speed printing and photocopying with excellent image
quality.
[0012] The invention further provides a plain paper photocopying system which is simple,
compact and low in cost. The photocopying system requires fewer processing steps than
those of conventional copying systems, with an extremely short and simple paper path.
[0013] The invention provides electrostatic imaging apparatus for pressure transfer of a
toner image from a dielectric surface to plain paper and the like. Such apparatus
effects simultaneous fusing of the toner image, and is characterized by a high efficiency
of toner transfer.
[0014] A preferred embodiment of the invention incorporates an impregnated aluminum layer
for the dielectric member. This dielectric surface possesses smoothness and hardness
properties which facilitate toner transfer, while possessing sufficient resistivity
to obtain a latent electrostatic image until toning. The dielectric surface created
by this preferred method maintains the above properties at elevated humidities.
[0015] According to a first aspect of the invention, apparatus for forming a toner image
on a receptor sheet is characterised by the features of claim 1.
[0016] According to a second aspect of the invention, a method of forming a toner image
on a receptor sheet is characterised by the features of claim 10.
[0017] The invention thus encompasses both electrophotography and electrostatic printing,
as well as preferred components to be employed in these processes.
[0018] Another version of the invention is seen in the shared processing stages in the electrostatic
copier and printer apparatus of the invention. After an electrostatic latent image
has been formed on a dielectric cylinder, the image is toned and pressure transferred
to plain paper or any suitable image receptor. Preferably, this transfer is achieved
by inserting the image receptor between the dielectric cylinder and a transfer roller
under high pressure. Advantageously, this pressure transfer is effected with simultaneous
fusing of the toner-image. Provision may be made for cleaning the surface of the dielectric
cylinder and transfer roll, and for discharging any residual electrostatic image on
the dielectric surface.
[0019] In the nip between the rollers, the ratio of the dielectric surface speed to the
image receptor speed is advantageously in the range of about 1.01 to 1.1, most advantageously
between 1.02 and 1.04. Best results are achieved where the dielectric surface has
a smoothness in excess of 0.508 mrms (20 microinch rms), and a high modulus of elasticity.
The transfer roller is preferably coated with a stress-absorbing plastics material.
The roller materials are advantageously chosen so that the image receptor will have
a tendency to adhere to the surface of the transfer roller in preference to that of
the dielectric roller. The apparatus provides effective toner transfer and fusing
without wrinkling of the receptor medium. The surface may be impregnated with a material
which consists essentially of a group II metal with a fatty acid containing between
8 and 32 carbon atoms, saturated or unsaturated.
[0020] The invention may be carried into practice in various ways and several specific embodiments
will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the drawings, in which,
FIGURE 1 is a sectional schematic view of electrophotographic apparatus in accordance
with a preferred embodiment of the invention;
FIGURE 2 is a partial sectional schematic view of the nip area of the upper rollers
of Figure 1;
FIGURE 3 is a sectional schematic view of electrophotographic apparatus in accordance
with an alternative embodiment of the invention;
FIGURE 4 is a sectional schematic view of electrostatic printing apparatus in accordance
with a preferred embodiment of the invention;
FIGURE 5 is a partial sectional schematic view of an illustrative charge neutralizing
device for the dielectric roller of Figure 4;
FIGURE 6 is an elevation view of a preferred mounting arrangement for electrostatic
printing apparatus of the type illustrated in Figure 4;
FIGURE 7 is a schematic view of the rollers of Figure 7 as seen from above;
FIGURE 8 is a geometric representation of the contact area of the rollers of Figure
6;
FIGURE 9 is a plot of residual toner as a function of end to end skew for the apparatus
of Example IV-3.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
I. Introduction
[0021] Two main embodiments of the invention are described, namely the double transfer electrophotographic
apparatus which is the subject of Section II, and the electrostatic transfer printer
which is the subject of Section III. These two embodiments differ in the means by
which a latent electrostatic image is created on a dielectric imaging roller; thereafter,
identical apparatus may be employed.
[0022] The skewed roller apparatus of Section IV is profitably employed to provide enhanced
toner transfer and fusing in either of the main embodiments.
II. Double Transfer Electrophotographic System
[0023] Figures 1 to 3 show double transfer electrophotographic apparatus 10 comprised of
three cylinders, and various process stations.
[0024] The upper cylinder is a photoconductive member 11, which includes a photoconductor
coating 13 supported on a conducting substrate 17, with an intervening semiconductor
substrate 15. Advantageous materials for the photoconductor surface layer 13 include
cadmium sulphide powder dispersed in a resin binder (photoconductive grade Cds is
employed, typically doped with activating substances such as copper and chlorine),
cadmium sulphoselenide powder dispersed in a resin binder (defined by the formula
CdS
xSe
y, where x+y=1), or organic photoconductors such as the equimolar complex of polyvinyl
carbazole and trinitrofluorenone.
[0025] The photoconductor is electrostatically charged at charging station 19 and then exposed
as exposing station 21 to form on the surface of the photoconductor an electrostatic
latent image of an original. The photoconductor may be charged employing a conventional
corona wire assembly, or alternatively it may be charged using the ion generating
scheme described in the parent application. The optical image which provides the latent
image on the photoconductor may be generated by any of several well known optical
scanning schemes. This latent image is transferred to a dielectric cylinder 25 formed
by a dielectric layer 27 coated on a metal substrate 29. The latent electrostatic
image on the dielectric cylinder 25 is toned and transferred by pressure to a receptor
medium 35 which is fed between the dielectric cylinder 25 and a transfer roller 37.
There are means 43, 45, 47 to remove residual toner from cylinder 25 and roller 37
and to erase any electrostatic image remaining on cylinder 25 after transfer. Apparatus
for effecting toning and subsequent steps shown generally at 30 in Figure 1, is discussed
detail in subsection IIIB below.
[0026] The method by which a latent electrostatic image is transferred from the photoconductive
cylinder 11 to the dielectric cylinder 25 employs a charge transfer by air gap breakdown.
The process of uniformly charging and exposing the surface of the photoconductive
coating 13 results in a charge density distribution corresponding to the exposed image,
and a variable potential pattern of the surface of the photoconductor coating 13 with
respect to the grounded conductive substrate 17. With reference to Figure 2, the charged
area of the photoconductor 11 is rotated to a position of close proximity (less than
0.05 mm) to the dielectric surface. An external potential 33 is applied between electrodes
in the conductive substrate of the photoconductive cylinder 11 and the metal substrate
29 of the dielectric cylinder 25, with a typical initial charge of about 1,000 volts
on photoconductive layer 13, to which an additional 400 volts are added by the externally
applied potential 33. The aggregate charge of 1,400 volts is decreased by about 800
volts during the exposing process.
[0027] It is possible to maintain the photoreceptor 11 in direct contact with the dielectric
roller 25, an arrangement which provides the advantage of simplicity in mounting and
driving the cylinders. An effective TESI process may be achieved under these conditions,
but this will result in toner transfer to the upper cylinder and therefore will require
additional cleaning apparatus.
[0028] The charge transfer process requires that a sufficient electrical stress be present
in the air gap to cause ionization of the air. The required potential depends on the
thickness and dielectric constants of the insulating materials, as well as the width
of the air gap (see Dessauer and Clark,
Xerography and Related Processes, the Focal Press, London and New York, 1965, at 427). Electrical stress will vary
according to the local charge density, but if sufficient to cause an air gap breakdown
it will result in a transfer of charge from photoconductor surface 13 to dielectric
surface 27, in a pattern duplicating the latent image. This means that a certain threshold
potential must be generated across the air gap. Roughly half the charge will be transferred,
leaving a potential of around 600 volts on the dielectric surface 27.
[0029] The necessary threshold potential may exist as a result of the uniform charging and
exposure of the photoconductor surface or an externally applied potential may be employed
in addition. Image quality is generally enhanced through the use of an external potential.
[0030] It is important to maintain the integrity of the latent electrostatic image, in the
face of disruptive charge transfer, which occurs under certain conditions when charge
transfer is effected on the approach of the two insulating surfaces. It has been observed
that the addition of a semiconducting layer 15 between the photoconductive surface
layer 13 and the conductive substrate 17 considerably reduces this effect as compared
with using the usual two-layer photoconductor. Although the phenomenon by which the
semiconducting layer eliminates the disruptive breakdown is not completely understood,
it is believed that the time constant introduced by this semiconducting layer has
the effect of smoothing or reducing the precipitous behavior otherwise associated
with disruptive breakdown. The employment of this preferred construction of the photoconductor
member 11 avoids a mottling and blurring of detail in the transferred image. A typical
range of air gap distances for charge transfer using this configuration would be on
the order of 0.0125 to 0.0375 mm.
[0031] The use of this method of charge transfer alleviates some of the problems resulting
from undesirable discharge characteristics of the photoconductive member. The employment
of an external potential in achieving a threshold potential leaves a higher voltage
on the dielectric cylinder than would be the case of a single transfer system relying
on the contrast potential of the photoconductor surface. This, in turn, results in
a greater contrast between the light and dark portions of the toned, visible image.
[0032] In order to provide uniformity from copy to copy, particularly with certain photoconductors
which exhibit fatigue, it is advantageous to discharge the residual latent image remaining
on the photoconductor after the latent image has been transferred to the dielectric
surface 27. This erasure may be conveniently carried out by an erase lamp 23 which
provides sufficient illumination to discharge the photoconductor below a required
level. The erase light 23 may be either fluorescent or incandescent.
Example II-1
[0033] In a specific operative example of an electrophotographic system of the construction
described, the cylindrical conducting core 29 of the dielectric cylinder 25 was machined
from 7075-T6 aluminum to a diameter of 76 mm. The length of this cylindrical core,
excluding machined journals, was 230 mm. The journals were masked, and the aluminum
anodized by use of the Sanford process (see S. Wernick and R. Pinner,
The Surface Treatment and Finishing of Aluminum and its Alloys, Robert Draper Ltd., 4th Edition 1971/72, Vol. 2, Page 567). The finished aluminum
oxide layer was 60 µm (micrometres) in thickness. The cylinder 25 was then placed
in a vacuum oven at 101.5917 kPa (30 inches mercury). After half an hour, the oven
temperature was set at 150°C. The cylinder was maintained at this temperature and
pressure for four hours. The heat cylinder was brush-coated with melted zinc stearate
and returned to the vacuum oven for a few minutes at 150°C, 101.59kPa (30 inches mercury).
The cylinder was removed from the oven and allowed to cool. The impregnated surface
27 of the dielectric cylinder 25 was then finished to 0.125 to 0.25µm rms using 600
grit silicon carbide paper.
[0034] The pressure roller 37 consisted of a solid machined 50 mm diameter core 41 over
which was press fitted a 50 mm inner diameter, 62.5 outer diameter polysulphone sleeve
39.
[0035] The conducting substrate 17 of the photoconductor member 11, comprising an aluminum
sleeve, was fabricated of 6061 aluminum tubing with a 3 mm wall and a 50 mm outer
diameter. The outer surface was machined and the aluminum anodized (again, using the
Sanford process) to a thickness of 50 m. In order to provide the proper level of oxide
layer conductivity, nickel sulphide was precipitated in the oxide pores by dipping
the anodized sleeve in a solution of nickel acetate (50 g/l, pH of 6) for 3 minutes.
To form the semiconducting layer 15, the sleeve was then immediately immersed into
concentrated sodium sulphide for 2 minutes and then rinsed in distilled water. This
procedure was repeated three times. The impregnated anodic layer was then sealed in
water (92° Celcius, pH of 5.6) for ten minutes. The semiconducting substrate 15 was
spray coated with a binder layer, the photoconductor coating 13 consisting of photoconductor
grade cadmium sulphoselenide powder milled with a heatset DeSoto Chemical Co. acrylic
resin, diluted with methyl ethyl ketone to a viscosity suitable for spraying. The
dry coating thickness was 40 µm, and the cadmium pigment concentration in the resin
binder was 18% by volume. The resin was crosslinked by firing at 180°C for three hours.
[0036] The dielectric cylinder 25 was gear driven from an AC motor to provide a surface
speed of twenty cms per second. The pressure roller 37 was mounted on pivoted and
spring-loaded side frames, causing it to press against the dielectric cylinder 25
with a pressure of 55 kg per linear cm of contact. The side frames were machined to
provide a 1.10 end-to-end between rollers 25 and 37.
[0037] Strips of tape 0.025 mm thick and 3 mm wide were placed around the circumference
of the photoconductor sleeve 11 at each end in order to space the photoconductor at
a small interval from the oxide surface of the dielectric cylinder 25. The photoconductor
sleeve was freely mounted in bearings and friction driven by the tape which rested
on the oxide surface.
[0038] The photoconductor charging corona station 19, single component latent image toning
apparatus 31, and optical exposing station 21 were essentially identical to those
employed in the Develop KG Dr. Eisbein & Co. (Stuttgart) No. 444 copier.
[0039] The toner removal means 43 and 45 comprised flexible stainless steel scraper blades
and were employed to maintain cleanliness of both the oxide cylinder 25 and the polysulphone
pressure roll 37. The residual latent image was erased using a semiconducting rubber
roller in contact with the dielectric surface 27 (see Fig. 5).
[0040] With reference to the photoconductor-dielectric cylinder embodiment of Figure 2,
a DC power supply 33 was employed to bias the photoconductor sleeve 11 to a potential
of minus 400 volts relative to the dielectric cylinder core 29, which was maintained
at ground potential. The photoconductor surface 13 was charged to a potential of minus
1,000 volts relative to its substrate 17. An optical exposure of 25 lux-seconds was
employed in discharging the photoconductor in highlight areas. In undischarged areas,
a latent image of minus 400 volts was transferred to the oxide dielectric 27. This
image was toned, and then transferred to a plain paper receptor medium 35 which was
injected into the pressure nip at the appropriate time from a sheet feeder.
[0041] Copies were obtained at a rate of 30 per minute, having clean background, dense black
images, and a resolution in excess of twelve line pairs per millimetre. No image fusing,
other than that occurring during pressure transfer, was required.
Example II-2
[0042] In another embodiment of the double transfer copier, the photoconductor sleeve 11
was replaced with a flexible belt photoconductor 11ʹ, as shown in Figure 3. The photoconductor
11ʹ was comprised of a photoconductor layer 13ʹ which was formed from a one to one
molar solution of polyvinyl carbazole and trinitrofluorenone dissolved in tetrahydrafuran,
and coated onto a conducting paper base 15ʹ (West Virginia Pulp and Paper 45 No. LTB
base paper) to a dry thickness of 30µm. The photoconductor rollers 17ʹa and 17ʹb were
friction driven from the dielectric cylinder 25. The lower roller 17ʹb was biased
to minus 400 volts. The photoconductor was charged to 1,000 volts with the double
corona assembly 19ʹ shown in Figure 3. The electrostatic latent image was generated
by a flash exposure 21ʹ so that the entire image frame was generated without the use
of scanning optics.
[0043] The rest of the system was identical to the previous example with the exception of
the dielectric cylinder 25, which was fabricated from non-magnetic stainless steel
coated with a 15 µm layer of high density aluminum oxide. The coating was applied
using a Union Carbide Corp. (Linde Division) plasma spray technique. After spraying,
the oxide surface was ground and polished to a 0.25 m rms finish. Again, high quality
copies were obtained, even at operating speeds as high as 75 cms per second.
III. Electrostatic Transfer Printing
[0044] The electrostatic transfer printing apparatus to be described includes apparatus
for forming a latent electrostatic image on a dielectric surface (e.g. an imaging
roller) and means for accomplishing subsequent process steps.
A. Latent Electrostatic Image Formation
[0045] Apparatus from generating charged particles and for extracting them to be applied
to a further surface is disclosed in detail in section V below. Any of the embodiments
of such apparatus which are suitable for forming a latent electrostatic image on a
dielectric surface may be employed in the electrostatic printing apparatus discussed
in this section; for example, see the embodiments of Figures 11, 12, and 13 and particularly
the preferred matrix printing apparatus of Figure 13, which may be employed for multiplex
printing. Alternatively, the printing apparatus may incorporate any embodiment of
the electrostatic imaging device disclosed in the parent application.
[0046] All of the above charging devices are characterized by the production of a "glow
discharge," a silent discharge formed in air between two conductors separated by a
solid dielectric. Such discharges have the advantage of being self-quenching, whereby
the charging of the solid dielectric to a threshold value will result in an electrical
discharge between the solid dielectric and the control electrode. By application of
a time-varying potential, glow discharges are generated to provide a pool of ions
of both polarities.
[0047] It is useful to characterize all of the charging device embodiments in terms of a
"control electrode" and a "driver electrode." The control electrode is maintained
at a given DC potential in relation to ground, while the driver electrode is energized
around this value using a time-varying potential such as a high voltage AC or DC pulse
source.
B. Subsequent Processing
[0048] Identical apparatus may be employed for both electrophotography and printing to carry
out process steps subsequent to the creation on the dielectric cylinder of a latent
electrostatic image (compare Figures 1 and 4). The apparatus of Figure 4 will be considered
for illustrative purposes.
[0049] In Figure 4, the dielectric layer 75 of the dielectric cylinder 73 should have sufficiently
high resistance to support a latent electrostatic image during the period between
formation of the latent image and toning, or, in the case of electrophotographic apparatus,
between image transfer and toning. Consequently, the resistivity of the layer 75 must
be in excess of 10¹² ohm centimeters. The preferred thickness of the insulating layer
75 is between 0.025 and 0.075 mm. In addition, the surface of the layer 75 should
be highly resistant to abrasion and relatively smooth, with a finish that is preferably
better than 0.25µ m rms, in order to provide for complete transfer of toner to the
receptor sheet 81. The smoothness of dielectric surface 75 contributes to the efficiency
of toner transfer to the receptor sheet 81 by enhancing the release properties of
this surface. The dielectric layer 75 additionally has a high modulus of elasticity,
typically on the order of 6.89476 x 10⁷ kPa (10⁷ PSI), so that it is not distorted
significantly by high pressures in the transfer nip.
[0050] A number of organic and inorganic dielectric materials are suitable for the layer
75. Glass enamel, for example, may be deposited and fused to the surface of a steel
or aluminum cylinder. Flame or plasma sprayed high density aluminum oxide may also
be employed in place of glass enamel. Plastics materials, such as polyamides, polyimides
and other tough thermoplastic or thermosetting resins, are also suitable. A preferred
dielectric coating is anodized aluminum oxide impregnated with a metal salt of a fatty
acid, as described in the parent application.
[0051] The latent electrostatic image on dielectric surface 75 is transformed to a visible
image at toning station 79. While any conventional electrostatic toner may be used,
the preferred toner is of the single component conducting magnetic type described
by J.C. Wilson, U.S. Patent No. 2,846,333, issued August 5, 1958. This toner has the
advantage of simplicity and cleanliness.
[0052] The toned image is transferred and fused onto a receptive sheet 81 by high pressure
applied between rollers 73 and 83. It has been observed that providing a non-parallel
orientation, or skew, between the rollers of Figure 4 has a number of advantages in
the transfer/fusing process. An image receptor 81 such as plain paper has a tendency
to adhere to the compliant surface of the pressure roller 83 in preference to the
smooth, hard surface of the dielectric roller 73. Where rollers 73 and 83 are skewed,
this tendency has been observed to result in a "slip" between the image receptor 81
and the dielectric surface 75. The most notable advantage is a surprising improvement
in the efficiency of toner transfer from dielectric surface 75 to image receptor 81.
This efficiency may be expressed in percentage terms as the ratio of the weight of
toner transferred to that present on the dielectric roller before transfer. Apparatus
of this nature is disclosed in section IV.
[0053] The bottom roller 83 consists of a metallic core 87 which may have an outer covering
of engineering plastics 85. The surface material 85 of roller 83 typically has a modulus
of elasticity on the order of 1378952 to 3102642 kPa (200.000-450,000 PSI). The image
receptor 81 will tend to adhere to the surface 85 in preference to the dielectric
layer 75 because of the relatively high smoothness and modulus of elasticity of the
latter surface. In the embodiment of section IV, one function of this surface 85 is
to bond image receptor 81 when the latter is subjected to a slip between the roller
surfaces. Another function of the plastics coating 85 is to absorb any high stresses
introduced into the nip in the case of a paper jam or wrinkle. By absorbing stress
in the pastics layer 85, the dielectric coated roller 73 will not be damaged during
accidental paper wrinkles or jams. Coating 85 is typically a nylon or polyester sleeve
having a wall thickness in the range of 3 to 12.5 mm.
[0054] The pressure required for good fusing to plain paper is governed by such factors
as, for example, roller diameter, the toner employed, and the presence of any coating
on the surface of the paper. It has been discovered, in addition, that the skewing
of rollers 73 and 83 will decrease the transfer pressure requirements. See section
IV, below. Typical pressures run from 18 to 125 kg per linear cm of contact.
[0055] Scraper blades 89 and 91 may be provided in order to remove any residual paper dust,
toner accidentally impacted on the roll, and airborne dust and dirt from the dielectric
pressure cylinder and the back-up pressure roller. Since substantially all of the
toned image is transferred to the receptor sheet 81, the scraper blades are not essential,
but they are desirable in promoting reliable operation over an extended period. The
quantity of residual toner is markedly reduced in the embodiments of section IV,
infra.
[0056] The small residual electrostatic latent image remaining on the dielectric surface
75 after transfer of the toned image may be neutralized at the latent image discharge
station 93. The action of toning and transferring a toned latent image to a plain
paper sheet reduced the magnitude of the electrostatic image, typically from several
hundred volts to several tens of volts. In some cases where the toning threshold is
too low, the presence of a residual latent image will result in ghost images on the
copy sheet, which are eliminated by the discharge station 93.
[0057] At very high surface velocities of dielectric coating 75, the remaining charge can
again result in ghost images. In this case, multiple discharge stations will further
reduce the residual charge to a level below the toning threshold. Erasure of any latent
electrostatic image can be accomplished by using a high frequency AC potential between
electrodes separated by a dielectric, as described in section V below.
[0058] The latent residual electrostatic image may also be erased by contact discharging.
The surface of the dielectric must be maintained in intimate contact with a grounded
conductor or grounded semiconductor in order effectively to remove any residual charge
from the surface of the dielectric layer 75, for example, by a heavily loaded metal
scraper blade. The charge may also be removed by a semiconducting roller which is
pressed into intimate contact with the dielectric surface. Figure 5 shows a partial
sectional view of a semiconductor roller 98 in rolling contact with dielectric surface
75. Roller 98 advantageously has an elastomer outer surface.
EXAMPLE III-1
[0059] In a specific operative example of an electrographic printer in accordance with the
invention, the cylindrical conducting core 5 of the dielectric cylinder 1 was machined
from 7075-T6 aluminium to a 76.2 mm (3 inch) diameter. The length of the cylindrical
core, excluding machined journals, was 228.6 mm (9 inches). The journals were masked
and the aluminum anodized by use of the the Sanford Process (see S. Wernick and R.
Pinner,
The Surface Treatment and Finishing of Aluminum and Its Alloys, Robert Draper Ltd. fourth edition, 1971/72 volume 2, page 567). The finished aluminum
oxide layer was 60 microns in thickness. The conducting core was then heated in a
vacuum oven, 101.5917kPa (30 inches mercury); to a temperature of 150°C which temperature
was achieved in 40 minutes. The cylinder was maintained at this temperature and pressure
for four hours prior to impregnation.
[0060] A beaker of zinc stearate was preheated to melt the compound. The heated cylinder
was removed from the oven and coated with the melted zinc stearate using a paint brush.
The cylinder was then placed in the vacuum oven for a few minutes at 150°C, 101.5917
kPa (30 inches mercury), thereby forming dielectric surface layer. The cylinder was
removed from the oven and allowed to cool. After cooling, the member was polished
with successively finer SiC abrasive papers and oil. Finally, the member was lapped
to a 0.1143 µm (4.5 microinch) finish.
[0061] The pressure roller 11 consisted of a solid machined two inch diameter aluminum core
12 over which was press fit a 50.8 mm (two inch) inner diameter, 63.5 mm (2.5 inch)
outer diameter polysulfone sleeve 13. The dielectric roller was gear driven from an
AC motor to provide a surface speed of 304.8 mm/s (12 inches per second). The transfer
roller 11 was rotatably mounted in spring-loaded side frames, causing it to press
against the dielectric cylinder with a pressure of 5337.4 kg/m (300 pounds per linear
inch) of contact. The side frames were machined to provide a skew of 1.1° between
rollers 1 and 11.
[0062] A charging device of the type described in U.S. Patent No. 4,160,257 was manufactured
as follows. A 25.4µm (1 mil) stainless steel foil was laminated on both sides of a
25.4µm (1 mil) sheet of Muscovite mica.
[0063] The stainless foil was coated with resist and photoetched with a pattern similar
to that shown in Figure 12, with holes or apertures in the fingers approximately 0.1524
mm (.006 inch) in diameter. The complete print head consisted of an array of 16 drive
lines and 96 control electrodes which formed a total of 1536 crossover locations capable
of placing 1536 latent image dots across 195.072 mm (7.68 inch) length of the dielectric
cylinder. Corresponding to each crossover location was a 0.1524 mm (.006 inch) diameter
etched hole in the screen electrode. Bias potentials of the various electrodes were
as follows (with the cylinder's conducting core maintained at ground potential):
screen potential -600 volts
-control electrode potential -400 volts (during the application of a -400 volts
print pulse, this voltage becomes -700 volts)
driver electrode bias
with respect to Screen Potential +300 volts
[0064] The DC extraction voltage was supplied by a pulse generator, with a print pulse duration
of 10 microseconds. Charging occured only when there was simultaneously a pulse of
negative 400 volts to the fingers 44, and an alternating potential of 2 kilovolts
peak to peak at a frequency of 1 Mhz supplied between the fingers 44 and selector
bars 43. The print head was maintained at a spacing of 203.2 mm (8 mils) from dielectric
cylinder.
[0065] Under these conditions it was found that a 300 volt latent electrostatic image was
produced on the dielectric cylinder in the form of discrete dots. The image was toned
using single component toning apparatus essentially identical to that employed in
the Develop KG Dr. Eisbein and Company (Stuttegart) No. 444 copier. The toner employed
was Hunt 1186 of the Phillip A. Hunt Chemical Corporation.
[0066] The printing apparatus 70 included user-actuatable sheet-feeding apparatus (not shown)
for feeding individual sheets 81 of paper between cylinders 73 and 83. The paper feed,
toning apparatus, and cylinder rotation were driven from a unitary drive assembly
(not shown). Paper feed was synchronized with the rotation of dielectric cylinder
73 to ensure proper placement of the toned image.
[0067] Digital control electronics and a digital matrix character generator, designed according
to principles well known to those skilled in the art, were employed in order to form
dot matrix characters. Each character had a matrix size of 32 by 24 points. A shaft
encoder mounted on the shaft of the dielectric cylinder was employed to generate appropriate
timing pulses for the digital electronics.
[0068] Flexible steel scraper blades 89 and 91 were employed to maintain cleanliness of
dielectric cylinder 73 and transfer cylinder 83. With reference to the electrostatic
image erasing embodiment shown at 98 in Figure 5 the residual latent image was erased
using a semiconducting rubber roller in contact with the dielectric surface 75.
IV. Toner Transfer Apparatus With Skewed Rollers
[0069] Figure 6 shows in a plan view illustrative transfer printing apparatus 70 of the
type shown schematically in Figure 4, including details of a preferred mounting arrangement.
Side frames 59 and 69 house bearing retainers 57 and 67, which are fitted to rollers
73 and 83 in order to allow the rotation of the rollers while constraining their horizontal
and vertical movement. Substantially identical side frames and bearing retainers are
located at the other end of rollers 73 and 83. Bearing retainers 57 and 67, which
advantageously are of the type known as "self-aligning", fit within lips 51 and 61
on the respective side frames, and against shoulders (not shown) on the respective
rollers. The side frames are mounted on one side to superstructure 55, and are mounted
on the other end in spring-loaded journals 58 in order to provide a prescribed upward
pressure against roller 73. Roller 73 is driven at a desired rotational velocity by
means not shown, while roller 83 is frictionally driven due to the contact of the
rollers at the nip.
[0070] The mounting illustrated in Figure 6 is machined in order to provide a specified
"skew", or deviation of the axis of rollers 73 and 83 from a parallel orientation.
Rollers 73 and 83 may be adjustable around a pivot point at one end, by varying the
angular relationship (in the vertical plane) of the rollers at the other end. Alternatively,
the rollers may pivot around a central point of contact, by adjusting the offset of
one of the rolls about the axis of the other, this adjustment being equal at both
ends. This latter, "end-to-end" skew will be assumed hereinafter for illustrative
purposes.
[0071] The mounting arrangement shown in Figure 6 may be easily adapted to electrophotographic
apparatus of the type shown in Figure 1. In a further embodiment, the dielectric imaging
roller (upper roller) may comprise a photoconductive surface layer over a conducting
substrate. With reference to the sectional view of Figure 4, the imaging apparatus
71 may be replaced with any suitable apparatus known in the art for depositing a uniform
charge on surface 75, and for exposing the surface to a pattern of light and shadow
whereby the charge is selectively dissipated to form a latent electrostatic image.
As in the dielectric embodiment, photoconductive surface 75 is advantageously smooth
and abrasion resistant, with a high modulus of elasticity. See Example IV-4.
[0072] As shown in Figure 6, axle 50A is disposed in end-to-end skew, which may be measured
as an offset L in the plane of side frame 59. A more significant measure of skew,
however, is the angle between the projected axes of rollers 73 and 83 as measured
in the horizontal plane, or plane of paper feed. An illustrative value of skew to
effect the objects of the invention is 0.10 inch, measured at the center of roller
bearings 57 and 67, which are separated by a distance of 263.525 mm (10.375 inch)
for 228.6 mm (9 inch) long rollers. This respresents an angle of roughly 1.1°.
[0073] Figure 7 schematically illustrates skewed rollers 73 (with axis B-B) and 83 (with
axis C-C) as seen from above. Roller 83 is skewed at the bearing mounts by horizontal
offset L from the vertically projected axis Bʹ-Bʹ of roller 73. This corresponds to
an angle ϑ between axes B-B and C-C. Axis B-B is perpendicular to the direction A
of paper feed.
[0074] Figure 8 is a geometric representation of the surface of contact of the rollers at
the nip, showing the direction of paper feed before and after engagement by the rollers.
As a sheet of paper 81 travelling in direction A enters the nip, it is subjected to
divergent forces in direction D (perpendicular to the projected axis Bʺ-Bʺ of roller)
and E (perpendicualar to the projected axis Cʹ-Cʹ of roller). Because of the relatively
high smoothness and modulus of elasticity of the surface 75 of roller 73, the paper
will tend to adhere to the lower roll, and therefore to travel in direction E. This
results in a surface speed differential or "slip" between the surface of paper and
roller.
[0075] Due to the compression of the lower roller 83 at the nip, paper 81 will contact both
roller surfaces over a finite distance M in direction D. The width of the contact
area, M, can be calculated using a formular found in
Formulas For Stress and Strain (4th edition) by Ronald J. Roark, published by McGraw-Hill Book Company. The formula
for the case of two cylinders in contact under pressure with parallel axes can be
found on page 320 of the Roark Text, table XIV, section 5.
[0076] The transaxial width in metres of the contact of the two cylinders is given by

where P represents the cylinder loading in Nm⁻¹;
D¹, D² represents the diameters of the cylinders in m;
V₁ and V₂ represent Poissons ratio in compression for the materials of the cylinders;
and
E₁ʹ, Eʹ₂ represents the modulus of elasticity in compression for the materials of
the cylinders in Pa. (with W expressed in inches thus is:-

where P is in pounds per linear inch;
D₁, D₂ are in inches;
V₁ and V₂ as above;
E₁ and E₂ in pounds per square inch).
[0077] With reference to the resultant triangle in Figure 8, the surface of receptor 81
will undergo a proportional side travel N with respect to the surface of roller 73,
the factor of proportionally being the surface speed differential.
[0078] The skewing of rollers 73 and 83 in the above described manner results in a surprising
improvement in the efficiency of toner transfer from dielectric surface 73 to image
receptor 81. This efficiency may be expressed in percentage terms as the ratio of
the weight of toner transferred to that present on the dielectric roller before transfer.
This bears a complementary relationship to the weight of residual toner on the dielectric
roller after transfer. The increase in transfer efficiency, which is the most notable
advantage of the invention, minimizes the service problems attributable to the accumulation
of residual toner at the process stations associated with the image roller 73, including
scraper blades 89 and 91, erase head 98 and image generator 71. This effect depends
on the choice of surface material 75 and toner.
[0079] It is another surprising advantage of this technique that this enhanced toner transfer
is achieved without wrinkling of the receptor medium 81. These advantages accrued
even in the case of nonfibrous substrates 81, such as Mylar film.
Example IV-1
[0080] Apparatus of the type illustrated in Figures 4 and 6 incorporated a 228.6 mm (9 inch
long), 101.6 mm (4 inch) outer diameter roller 73 having a dielectric surface 75 of
anodically formed porous aluminum oxide, which had been dehydrated and impregnated
with zinc stearate and then surface polished. The dielectric surface of roller 73
was polished to obtain a finish of better than 0.254µm rms (10 microinch rms).
[0081] The pressure cylinder 83 included a 228.6 mm (9 inch) long steel mandrel with an
outer diameter of 79.375 mm (3.125 inches) over which was pressed a 9.525 mm (0.375
inch) thick sleeve of polyvinylchloride. The rollers were pressed together at 6250.3
Kg/m (350 pounds of pressure per linear inch) of nip.
[0082] A latent electrostatic image was formed on the dielectric surface of roller 73 by
means of an ion generator of the type disclosed in the parent application. The the
various voltages to the ion generator 71 were maintained at constant values. The tests
were conducted under the same ambient conditions throughout.
[0083] The toner employed was Hunt 1186 of the Phillip A. Hunt Chemical Corporation. The
single component latent image toning apparatus was essentially identical to that employed
in the Develop KG Dr. Eisbein & Co., (Stuttgart) No. 444 copier.
[0084] The toner was transferred onto Finch white bond paper, #60 vellum of Finch, Pruyn
and Co. This paper was fed into the nip between the dielectric and pressure rollers
at a constant speed throughout the tests.
[0085] Using the above specifications, the apparatus was operated at 0° skew, .55° skew,
and 1.1° skew, where the skew was measured as a 2.54 mm (0.10 inch) offset at the
bearing retainers of the 228.6 mm (9 inch) long pressure roll. The results shown in
Table IV-A were obtained by collecting the residual toner and comparing its weight
to the known weight of toner before transfer. No after transfer printing was present
on the upper cylinder during the tests with 0.55° and 1.1° skew. However, transfer
was so poor during the test without skew that printing was plainly visible on the
upper cylinder after transfer.

Example IV-2
[0086] The apparatus of Example IV-1 was employed with Desoto toner 2949-5 of Desoto Inc.
The toner was transferred onto coated OCR Imagetroll paper, manufactured by S.D. Warren.
The rollers were pressed together without skew at 7500.36 Kg/m (420 pounds per linear
inch), resulting in a transfer efficiency of 92.6 percent, measured by comparing the
weight of toner before image transfer to the weight of residual toner. The rollers
were then pressed together at 1.1° skew, with a pressure of 3571.6 Kg/m (200 pounds
per linear inch), and all other parameters unchanged, resulting in a transfer efficiency
of 99.95 percent.
Example IV-3
[0087] The apparatus of Example IV-1 was employed with the following modifications. The
pressure cylinder 83 comprised a 228.6 mm (9 inch) long steel mandrel with a 1.945
inch outer diameter, over which was pressed a 228.6 mm (9 inch) long Celcon sleeve
with a 88.9 (3.50 inch) outer diameter. (Celcon is a trademark of Celanese Chemical
Co. for thermoplastic linear acetal resins). The two rollers were pressed together
at 3571.6 Kg/m (200 pounds of nip pressure per linear inch) of nip.
[0088] The toner employed was Coates RP0357 of the Coates Bros. and Co., Ltd. The toner
was transferred onto Finch white bond paper, #60 vellum.
[0089] Using the above specifications, the apparatus was operated with end-to-end skew,
varied over a range of angles from 0.0° to 1.1°. The apparatus was operated using
a constant weight of toner prior to transfer, and the residual toner present on dielectric
roller 73 was collected and weighed. The results are shown in Table IV-B, and are
graphed in Figure 9. In the case of the test using no skew, the residual toner was
visible as printing remaining on the upper roller.
[0090] These tests showed a dramatic improvement in the efficiency of toner transfer when
the skew was increased from 0.0° to .42°; this resulted in a decrease in the weight
of residual toner by a factor of 53. Increases in skew from .42° to .85° and from
.55° to 1.1° further reduced the weight of residual toner by factors of somewhat better
than 2.

Example IV-4
[0091] The apparatus of Example IV-4 was employed with the modification that the imaging
roller 73 comprised a photoconductive roller. An aluminum sleeve was fabricated of
6061 aluminium tubing with 3.175 mm (1/8") wall and 101.6 mm (4") outer diameter.
The sleeve was spray coated with a binder layer photoconductor consisting of photoconductor
grade Sylvania PC-100 cadmium sulfide pigement of Sylvania Comp. Electronics Corp.,
dispersed in a melamine-acrylic resin, diluted with methyl ethyl ketone to a viscosity
suitable for spraying. The resin was crosslinked by firing at 600° for three hours.
[0092] A photoconductor charging corona and optical exposing system were essentially identical
to those employed in the Develop KG Dr. Eisbein & Co. (Stuttgart) No. 444 Copier.
The toner transfer efficiency underwent improvements comparable to those of Example
IV-1 for increasing skew angles of 0.0°, 0.55°, and 1.1°.