[0001] This invention relates to coin validation apparatus. It relates particularly to an
apparatus which is applicable to detecting the values of coins dropped into a slot,
and therefore it may be used in a vending machine, a telephone coin box, a coin sorting
machine or other suitable device where there is a need to check the values of incoming
coins inserted by a potential customer or user.
[0002] According to the invention, there is provided coin validation apparatus comprising
a coin chute arranged for directing a coin entering the apparatus such that the coin
will be brought into contact with a hard striking surface, a microphone positioned
to detect acoustic vibrations of the coin after striking said surface, an electronic
circuit capable of comparing data from said coin with stored data representative of
a set of standard coins and indicating which value of coin corresponds to that having
entered said apparatus, in which the part of the apparatus before the electronic circuit
includes a coin detector arranged to actuate said circuit at a time when a coin has
been detected as entering the apparatus.
[0003] In one embodiment, the coin detector may comprise a pressure sensor attached to said
striking surface. The pressure sensor may be a body of a piezoelectric or piezoresistive
material. Alternatively, the coin detector may rely upon the coin causing a change
in capacitance, electromagnetic induction or transmission of a light beam.
[0004] In a further embodiment, the coin detector may rely upon an electrical output from
the microphone to actuate said circuit.
[0005] By way of example, some particular embodiments of the invention will now be described
with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Figure 1 shows one form of coin validation apparatus for obtaining the acoustic spectrum
emitted by a coin,
Figure 2 is a block diagram of an electronic circuit for recognizing the value of
the entering coin,
Figure 3 is a similar diagram of a narrow bandpass filter of the electronic circuit,
Figures 4 and 5 are graphs showing the signals obtained when particularly coins are
detected in the circuit of Figure 2,
Figure 6 shows graphs depicting the results of a Fast Fourier Transform on one coin,
Figure 7 shows an alternative form of coin validation apparatus in side and plan views,
Figure 8 shows the voltage signal obtained from the piezoelectric sensor in the apparatus
of Figure 7 for different values of coin,
Figure 9 is a graph showing the peak-to-peak voltages obtained from different values
of coin, and,
Figure 10 shows a further form of coin validation apparatus which makes use of an
inductive sensing method.
[0006] When a coin is struck against a hard object, it will vibrate with a characteristic
set of modes, determined by the metal from which it is made and the dimensions (thickness,
diameter if the coin is circular and any other dimensional features, such as the presence
of facets, holes or regions or differing composition). The sound emitted by the coin
will contain information about these resonant modes, whose relative amplitudes will
change with time after the coin has been struck. Figure 1 shows an apparatus which
can be used to obtain the acoustic spectrum emitted by a coin. The coin 1 is allowed
to drop down a chute 2 to strike a resilient plate 3 where it emits sound. The sound
emitted is detected by a pressure microphone 4.
[0007] The best placing for the microphone is adjacent the face of the coin, rather than
the edge, as the signal will be largest in this location. However, any convenient
position close to the coin will provide a usable signal. The signal detected by the
microphone is fed into a circuit as shown in Figure 2.
[0008] Figure 2 is a block diagram of an electronic circuit for recognising the value of
the entering coin. As depicted in the diagram, the microphone 4 is connected to an
amplifier 6 and from there to a bandpass filter 7. An output from the filter 7 is
applied to an RMS detector 8, which is phase sensitive, and then to a Schmitt trigger
device 9.
[0009] In the circuit of Figure 2, after the amplification stage, the filter 7 is a "notch"
filter whose frequency is set to the fundamental resonant mode frequency of the coin
to be recognised. One form of construction of such a filter is shown in Figure 3,
and this will act as a narrow bandpass filter. Figure 3 shows an AF oscillator 11
which is connected to a reference unit 12 which provides square wave signals to a
phase sensitive detector 13 at the same frequency and in phase with the signal from
the AF oscillator 11. The signal input on a line 14 is also applied to the detector
13 and this provides an output on the line 16.
[0010] In Figure 3, the reference unit 12 is a Brookdeal Model 9422 and the phase sensitive
detector 13, a Brookdeal Model 9412A. The frequency of the resulting filter is set
by the AF oscillator while output from the phase sensitive detector 13 is inversely
proportional to the frequency difference between that set by the AF oscillator 11
and the signal input frequency. The signal output on the line 16 is an AC signal with
a frequency equal to the frequency difference between the input signal on line 14
and that set by the AF oscillator 11. It is important that the bandwidth of the filter
to set wide enough so that the resonances of all the coins of a particular denomination
will be detected, while being narrow enough to avoid false detection of coins of different
denominations. A bandwidth of 5% should do this adequately.
[0011] After the filter stage, the RMS detector 8 is used which will give an output proportional
to the root mean square of the AC signal passed through the filter (see Figure 2).
This part of the circuit is followed by the Schmitt trigger 9 and a monostable 17.
The Schmitt trigger 9 will give an output which is zero volts (logic zero) when the
output from the RMS circuit is below a predetermined level and an output equal to
that of the positive voltage supply (logic one) when the output from the RMS circuit
is above that level. The monostable 17 will trigger on the logic one and hold it for
a predetermined time so that following circuitry and mechanical devices for dealing
with the coin can act upon the information that the coin is of a particular denomination.
Figures 4 and 5 show the signals obtained when coins are used in the apparatus.
[0012] Figure 4 is a graph which shows the output levels from a filter of the type depicted
in Figure 3 when a particular coin is used in the apparatus of Figure 1. The vertical
axis shows output amplitude which is the peak-to-peak potential in volts of the signal
as measured at the output of the RMS detector 8. A scale from zero to 4.0 volts is
marked. A voltage level corresponding to a frequency of 9.987 kilohertz is given by
the horizontal line A. The horizontal axis of the graph shows the different amplitudes
produced by the coins of ten, five, two and one penny in value. Only the ten pence
coin is observed to produce amplitudes that exceed the given discrimination level
of the line A.
[0013] Figure 5 is a similar graph in which the vertical axis covers the range from zero
to 1.0 volt and a discrimination level at a frequency level of 8.460 kilohertz has
been marked by the line B. The same four coins were tested and this time only the
two pence coin was observed to produce an amplitude exceeding the discrimination level
marked by the line B.
[0014] It can be seen that in both cases a signal level can be set which will discriminate
in favour of one particular coin against virtually all other coins.
[0015] There is an instance in which the device described here will provide a false trigger
reaction. This could occur with a coin which differs in dimensions and metal type
from the intended one but coincidentally has a similar resonant frequency to the intended
coin. Such a coin can be sorted by having a device for measuring the diameter and,
possibly, the thickness of the coin delivered to the system. A simple logic circuit
will then allow sorting of the coins unambiguously. Suitable methods for diameter
measurement include inductive techniques and optical techniques. An alternative to
measuring the diameter of the coin would be to use a particular resonant mode structure
which will be described later.
[0016] A system which will sort a number of different coins can be constructed by placing
any number of the circuits shown if Figure 2 in parallel with different filter frequencies
selected which are to cover the individual coins to be recognised. Each circuit could
be linked to a diameter measuring device to give further protection against incorrect
selection or sorting.
[0017] A number of modifications can be made to the simple system described above which
would give improved sorting operation.
[0018] In the first embodiment, it is recognised that a coin struck on a metal plate will
vibrate in more than one mode and that while the fundamental flexural mode will dominate,
other modes such as the higher-order flexural modes, radial modes and thickness modes
of vibration will all contribute to the mode structure, and hence the sound emitted
by the coin. Furthermore, the temporal shape of each mode will be different for each
coin, depending on the inter-mode coupling which occurs and the degree to which each
mode is damped. These factors will in turn depend on the material from which the coin
is made, its physical dimensions and (from the fact that not all coins are simple
discs) its shape. It is therefore considered that coin recognition could be accomplished
by analysing the frequency/time structure of the sound emitted by the coin. This could
be accomplished in one of the following ways:
[0019] a) Digitising and recording the sound emitted and performing a Fast Fourier Transform
(FFT) on the resulting signal. The FFT function contains all the frequency information
required to do the coin recognition task, and this could be accomplished using digital
correlation of the FFT function for the coin with those of a number of library functions
for different coins.
[0020] The use of this idea has been demonstrated using a Wavetek 5820A FFT Analyser, using
a Bruel and Kjaer 4135 Microphone to detect the acoustic signal. Figure 6 gives an
example of a recorded spectrum for a single coin.
[0021] Figure 6 shows two graphs, an upper one of which has a vertical scale showing the
voltage recorded from the sensing microphone with values from -4 to +4. The horizontal
axis indicates Time (seconds) from 0 to 5.8 milliseconds. In the lower graph, the
vertical axis shows the acoustic power in dB in a 1Hz bandwidth on a scale from -90
to +10. The horizontal axis shows frequency (measured in hertz) on a scale from 0
to 50,000.
[0022] The multiple peaks due to the different resonant modes are clearly visible.
[0023] The peaks in the acoustic spectra are characteristic of the coin denomination and
Table 1 lists the frequency bands up to 50KHz in which major and minor resonant peaks
of these spectra occur for the United Kingdom coin set.

[0024] Close inspection of the spectra reveals that there are very significant differences
between most coins, so that it should be possible to obtain good discrimination between
most of these coin denominations on the basis of the acoustic signature alone.
[0025] b) Passing the sound signal through a filter bank (each filter corresponding to a
band in Table 1) and recording the temporal variation of the signal passing through
each filter. These temporal variations would then be compared with values stored in
a library to obtain the coin recognition. The filter bank would be implemented by
either low frequency acoustic filters or by modulating a radio frequency carrier with
the sound produced by the coin. The modulated carrier would then be discriminated
using discrete RF filters, which could be implemented as surface acoustic wave or
ceramic filters, looking at the modulated side bands. This modulated RF approach would
reduce the size and cost of the filters required.
[0026] In a second embodiment, it is recognised that a system such as that described in
Figure 1, it would be beneficial to provide some means by which the presence of a
coin could be detected and used to switch-on the acoustic recognition circuit. A number
of possible methods are envisaged by which this could be done:
[0027] a) The resilient plate 3 which is struck by the coin could be provided with a touch-sensitive
portion which would give an electrical signal to allow the acoustic circuits to be
triggered. Such a touch sensitive portion could be provided as a mechanical switch
or as an electrical sensor. One suitable electric sensor would be a piece of PZT piezoelectric
ceramic, lithium niobate piezoelectric single crystal or PVDF piezoelectric plastics
material, bonded to the resilient plate 3. A suitable apparatus for doing this is
shown in Figure 7. In this case, the piezoelectric material 18 is bonded to the back
of the plate 3, so that when the coin 1 strikes the plate 3 it will bend the plate,
producing an electrical output on a line 19 by means of the piezoelectric effect.
An advantage of this method is that it will give an output proportional to the mass
of the coin 1, which could be used by the electronics of the system in conjunction
with the other information to give yet another method for recognising the coin. A
demonstration of this is described as follows. A PZT-5 disc constituting the piezoelectric
material 18 was soldered to a plate 3 formed by a phosphor/bronze strip with the dimensions:
0.8 x 12 x 51 millimetres. Coins 1 were allowed to run down a chute constituted by
a ramp 21 from a known, fixed distance to strike the plate 3 and the outputs on the
line 19 from the PZT disc were taken through an amplifier and fed into an oscilloscope.
Figure 8 shows the forms of the outputs obtained from several different coins, these
coins being, from the upper graph, values of fifty, ten, five, two and one penny,
respectively. In these graphs, the vertical axis has a scale of five volts per unit
square whilst the horizontal axis measures 0.5 milliseconds per unit square.
[0028] Figure 9 shows how the peak-to-peak voltages recorded depend on the different coins
used. The vertical axis of the graph shows voltages from 4 to 24 volts. It can be
seen that the coins are characterised by the voltage values which can give useful
information for the sorting process. The forms of the voltage outputs are complex
and again characteristic for the given coin type. The shapes of these waveforms can
also be used for coin sorting by use of correlation with a library of known waveforms
for different coins. As an alternative to the use of the piezoelectric dāā coefficient,
coupled to the bending of the resilient plate 3, a body of piezoelectric material
placed on the front of the plate and operating in its dāā mode would give positive
indication of the presence of a coin. Other electrical sensors which could be used
for the touch sensitive portion include a piezoresistive polymer, such as a conductive
carbon loaded rubber, which would give a change in resistance when impacted by a coin.
Alternatively a plastic/metal sandwich forming a parallel plate capacitor could be
used if the coin impact was required to give a change in capacitance.
[0029] b) An inductive method could alternatively be used to give a signal of the presence
of a coin. Apparatus for using this method could take the form of two coaxial coils,
one of which carries an AC current. These coils might be arranged as shown in Figure
10 where a first coil 22 is positioned to surround a second coil 23. The change in
the mutual inductance of the coils caused by the presence of the coin 1 changes the
signal induced in the second coil 23 due to the current flowing in the first and this
in turn can be used to indicate the presence of the coin.
[0030] c) A simple optical beam sensor can be used to give an indication of the presence
of a coin. If an optical source is used to provide a beam will give indication of
the presence of the coin and it can be used to trigger the electronic sensing circuit.
[0031] The foregoing description of embodiments of the invention has been given by way of
example only and a number of modifications may be made without departing from the
scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims. For instance, the pressure
microphone indicated in Figure 1 can be replaced by a directional pressure gradient
microphone. A pressure microphone may be subject to interference from external sources
of noise which could interfere with the operation of the system. Whilst this may be
largely mitigated by ensuring that the microphone is well insulated acoustically from
the environment, it may be advantageous under certain circumstances, such as operation
in very noisy environments, to use a pressure gradient microphone. Such microphones
do not respond to changes in ambient sound pressure such as are caused by distant
sources of noise, but are sensitive to the pressure gradients caused by sound sources
close to the microphone. Hence, such a microphone would respond well to the sound
from the vibrating coin if it were close to it but it would be insensitive to ambient
noise. Such microphones are also highly directional and hence would, if correctly
positioned, provide a further means for discriminating for the signal from the vibrating
coin and against the background noise.
1. Coin validation apparatus comprising a coin chute arranged for directing a coin
entering the apparatus such that the coin will be brought into contact with a hard
striking surface, a microphone positioned to detect acoustic vibrations of the coin
after striking said surface, an electronic circuit capable of comparing data from
said coin with stored data representative of a set of standard coins and indicating
which value of coin corresponds to that having entered said apparatus, in which the
part of the apparatus before the electronic circuit includes a coin detector arranged
to actuate said circuit at a time when a coin has been detected as entering the apparatus.
2. Apparatus as claimed in Claim 1, in which the coin detector comprises a pressure
sensor attached to said striking surface.
3. Apparatus as claimed in Claim 2, in which the said pressure sensor is a body of
a piezoelectric material.
4. Apparatus as claimed in Claim 2, in which the said pressure sensor is a body of
a piezoresistive material.
5. Apparatus as claimed in Claim 1, in which the said coin detector relies upon the
coin causing a change in capacitance, electromagnetic induction or transmission of
a light beam.
6. Apparatus as claimed in Claim 1, in which the said coin detector relies upon an
electrical output from the microphone to actuate said electronic circuit.
7. Coin validation apparatus substantially as hereinbefore described with reference
to any one of the accompanying drawings.