[0001] In the literature, various substitute products for coffee have been proposed. The
best known substitute for coffee is probably chicory.
[0002] In view of its availability, maize could be a good starting product for making a
coffee substitute, were it not that the roasting of maize meets with practical problems.
Maize kernels are known to burst open on exposure to heat before they are properly
roasted, to form "popcorn". The porous and insulating structure formed owing to the
popping prevents further transport of heat into the maize kernel, so that further
roasting becomes impossible. When further heat is supplied, the outside becomes burnt
only, while within the kernel the maize remains crude and unroasted. An extract of
maize thus roasted has a bitter and burnt taste.
[0003] In Chemical Abstracts, Vol. 55, No. 19, 1961, No. 19066b, a process is described,
comprising steeping ground maize for 48 hours in water to cause fermentation, followed
by roasting the fermented maize on direct fire. This results in a highly hygroscopic
product.
[0004] Up until now, a good method of roasting maize kernels or ground maize so as to produce
a water-extractable product which can be used for making a coffee substitute has
not been found.
[0005] It is an object of the present invention to provide a process for roasting maize,
in which the problems outlined above are not encountered.
[0006] It has surprisingly been found that soaking maize with water to a moisture content
of at least 25% by weight makes the maize properly roastable.
[0007] The invention is accordingly characterized by bringing maize to a water content of
25-45%, preferably 30-40% by weight, and roasting the maize at a temperature ranging
from 200 to 400°C.
[0008] It is extremely surprising that the use of the present process provides an excellently
roasted maize, which is properly extractable. In fact, one would expect that, owing
to the presence of considerably more water than is normally the case (the original
water content of maize is 12% by weight) would result in an even higher degree of
popcorn formation during roasting. It has been found, however, that this is not the
case, and that an excellently roasted product is obtained.
[0009] According to the invention, the water content of the maize is brought, prior to roasting,
at 25-45% by weight, preferably at least 33% by weight. Within this range, an optimum
product is obtained. The adjustment of the water content is preferably effected by
soaking in water or by a treatment with steam. It has been found that boiling in water
has a less favourable result, although it is possible under certain conditions.
[0010] The period of soaking depends upon the desired water content. Suitable soaking periods
with cold water, i.e., water of 5-25°C, range from 2 to 20 hours. Preferably, no,
or no substantial fermentation of the maize occurs during soaking.
[0011] Roasting the whole maize kernel and roasting ground maize are both possible. In the
roasting of ground maize, there is the possibility of effecting a separation between
germ and starch portions of the maize kernels. Of these two components, the starch
portion provides a brew which is fairly neutral. The germ has a pleasant smell as
a dry roasted product, and produces a brew with a somewhat burnt note.
[0012] The invention also relates to a hot or cold beverage obtained by the extraction of
maize roasted using the process according to the invention. In fact, it has been found
that the extract of thus roasted maize, possibly together with milk, sugar or alcohol,
provides a nice drink.
[0013] It is further noted that, basically, any type of maize can be used.
[0014] The invention is illustrated in and by the following examples.
Example I
[0015] Maize kernels with a water content of 12% were soaked in water for 10 hours and,
with a moisture content of 34% by weight, introduced into a gas-fired test roaster.
Over a period of 13 minutes the temperature was raised to 240°C, and was then kept
at that value for another 7 minutes.
[0016] The roasted maize was subsequently ground, and a brew was made from it. The extraction
efficiency was 50%, and the taste of the brew was fairly neutral, slightly malty-grainy.
Comparative Example 1
[0017] Maize kernels with a moisture content of 12%, i.e., the original moisture content,
were roasted in the same manner as described in Example I. The material was greatly
expanded (popped). After grinding and making a brew, the extraction efficiency was
found to be 45%, while the taste of the brew was characterized as inferior, unpleasantly
bitter and burnt.
Example II
[0018] Maize kernels with a moisture content of 12% were ground, and the fines were removed
over a sieve of 0.6 mm. The ground maize was soaked in water for 2½ hours to a moisture
content of 34% by weight. Using the same conditions as described in Example I, the
granules were roasted. From the roasted maize granules, a brew was made. No difference
in taste and extraction efficiency was observed, compared with the results of Example
I.
[0019] The advantage of roasting maize in the ground form is that a more uniform product
is obtained.
1. A process for roasting maize, characterized by bringing maize to a water content
of 25-45% by weight, and roasting the maize at a temperature in the range of from
200 to 400°C.
2. A process as claimed in claim 1, characterized by adjusting the water content to
at least 33% by weight.
3. A process as claimed in claim 1 or 2, characterized by roasting ground maize.
4. A process as claimed in claim 1 or 2, characterized by roasting whole maize kernels.
5. A process as claimed in claim 3, characterized by roasting mainly the germ of the
maize kernel.
6. Hot or cold beverage obtained by the extraction of roasted maize produced using
the process as claimed in any of claims 1-5.