[0001] This invention relates to a low irritant detergent composition, and more specifically
to a detergent composition having low irritation to the skin and eyes as well as good
washing and cleaning power and foaming power.
[0002] Detergents are of course required to have excellent detergency such as washing and
cleaning power and foaming power and for those brought into direct contact with the
skin and the like such as detergents for people (shampoos, body shampoos, etc.), kitchen
detergents, mild detergents for wool, are also required in particular to have low
irritation to the skin and eyes and also to have good stability as solutions.
[0003] As surfactants which are principal components of these detergents, anionic surfactants
such as linear alkyl benzene sulfonates (LAS), alkyl sulfate esters (AS), polyoxyethylene
alkyl ether sulfate ester salts (AES) and a-olefinsulfonates (AOS) are used. Although
anionic surfactants have good detergency, they are all irritant to the skin and eyes,
they cannot be considered ideal as surfactants for such detergents.
[0004] Incidentally, as a system capable of meeting these requirements to a certain satisfactory
extent, it has been preferably practised in recent years to use in combination a polyoxyethylene
alkyl ether sulfate and an ampholytic imidazoline surfactant, especially, in shampoos.
A higher proportion of the polyoxyalkyl ether sulfate is however accompanied by a
drawback that irritant property becomes relatively higher although the characteristics
of the resultant composition as a shampoo, such as foaming properties and washing
and cleaning power, are satisfied. On the other hand, a higher proportion of the amphoteric
imidazoline surfactant is accompanied by a drawback that foaming properties and washing
and cleaning power both become insufficient although irritant property is reduced.
[0005] With a view toward solving the problems described above, Japanese Patent Laid-Open
No. 127396/1987 discloses to incorporate a surfactant of the sulfosuccinic acid type
as a third essential component. The surfactant of the sulfosuccinic acid type itself
is however a relatively low irritant anionic surfactant and as disclosed in Japanese
Patent Laid-Open No. 38395/1981 by way of example, is effective in reducing the irritant
property of AES when combined with AES. Such a surfactant of the sulfosuccinic acid
type is however generally insufficient in foaming power and low-temperature stability,
so that it is the current status that the surfactant is used only as an auxiliary
active agent for AES.
[0006] In recent years, attention has been called to the byproduction of dioxane in AES,
especially, in Europe. Elimination of dioxane has led to the avoidance of AES, so
that there is an outstanding desire for the development of a low irritant detergent
free of AES.
[0007] As a detergent which features total omission of AES, the detergent of Japanese Patent
Laid-Open No. 86892/1980 which contains both a surfactant of the sulfosuccinic acid
type and a surfactant of the imidazoline type may be mentioned as a relatively close
example. It however involves a problem in foaming property.
[0008] The present inventors have conducted an extensive investigation with a view toward
solving such problems. As a result, it has been found that a detergent composition
capable of reducing irritation and moreover having satisfactory stability as a solution
without impairing its foaming power and washing and cleaning power can be obtained
by combining (A) an a-olefinsulfonic acid salt and (B) a particular surfactant of
the sulfosuccinic acid ester type with (C) an amphoteric imidazoline surfactant and
(D) a nonionic alkanolamide surfactant, leading to completion of the present invention.
[0009] The present invention therefore provides a low irritant detergent composition comprising
(A) an α-olefinsulfonic acid salt, (B) a surfactant of the sulfosuccinic acid ester
type, represented by the following formula [I]:

wherein R means R
1O(̵CH
2CH
2O)̵
m, R, being a linear or branched alkyl or alkenyl group having 8-22 carbon atoms and
m standing for a number of 1-20 on average, and M denotes a hydrogen atom or a cationic
ion capable of forming a water-soluble salt selected from the group consisting of
alkali metal ions, ammonium ion and organoammonium ions, (C) an amphoteric imidazoline
surfactant and (D) a nonionic alkanolamide surfactant, the weight ratio of (A)/(B)
being 1/3-3/1, that of (C)
/(A) being 1/10-1/1, that of (D)-(A) + (B) being 1.20-1/2. and the sum of (A)+(B)+(C)+(D)
accounting for 10-40 wt.%.
[0010] As the a-olefinsulfonic acid salt (A) used in this invention, may be mentioned by
way of example a sulfonated a-olefin derivative represented by the following formula
[V]:
R
10-SO
3M" [V]
wherein R
io means a linear or branched alkenyl or hydroxyl-substituted alkyl group having 8-22
carbon atoms on average and M denotes a hydrogen atom or a cation capable of forming
a water-soluble salt selected from the group consisting of alkali metal salts. The
preferable average carbon number of R
10 may range especially from 14 to 16 from the standpoint of the foaming property and
stability of the composition.
[0011] As the surfactant of the sulfosuccinic acid ester type (B) in this invention, it
is possible to use a higher alcohol ethoxylate or that derived from a higher fatty
acid amide and containing an ethoxy group, which is represented by the formula [I].
The number m of polymerized ethoxy groups in the formula [I] may preferably be 2-10
since a greater m value gives less irritation but leads to reduced fundamental properties
as a detergent. As the higher alcohol represented by R,OH, not only a primary alcohol
but also a secondary alcohol can be used suitably.
[0012] Illustrative examples of the amphoteric imidazoline surfactant (C) in this invention
include the following compounds (amphoteric surfactants of the amideamine type) (1
)-(3).
[0013]
(1) ampholytic imidazoline surfactants of the tertiary amide type, represented by
the following formula [II]:

wherein R2 means a linear or branched alkyl or alkenyl group having 7-21 carbon atoms, R3 denotes -CH2COOM' or -CH2CH2COOM', M being a hydrogen atom or a cationic ion capable of forming a water-soluble
salt selected from the group consisting of alkali metal ions, alkaline earth metal
ions, ammonium ion and organoammonium ions, and R4 is a hydrogen atom or -CH2COOM' or -CH2CH2COOM', M having the same meaning as defined above;
(2) amphoteric imidazoline surfactants of the secondary amide type, represented by
the following formula [III]:

wherein Rs means a hydrogen atom, -CH2COOM or -CH2CH2COOM', M' having the same meaning as defined above, and R2 and R4. have the same meanings as defined above; and
(3) imidazoline surfactants of the a-position addition type, represented by the following
formula [IV]:

wherein Rs means a linear or branched alkyl or alkenyl group having 6-20 carbon atoms,
R7 denotes a hydrogen atom or -C2H40H, Rs is -C2H4OH, -C2H4OC2H4COOM' or -C2H4.COOM', M' having the same meaning as defined above, and R9 means a hydrogen atom or -C2H4COOM' having the same meaning as defined above.
[0014] These compounds may be used either singly or in combination. Further, as the R
2CO- group in the formula [II] or the RsCHCO- group in the formula [IV], a group derived
from lauric acid, oleic acid, coconut oil fatty acid or palm kernel oil fatty acid
is preferred. A sodium ion, hydrogen atom or triethanolamine salt ion is most preferred
as M .
[0015] As the nonionic alkanolamide surfactant (D) in this invention, may be mentioned for
example a compound represented by the following formula [VI]:

wherein R
1 means a linear or branched alkyl or alkenyl group having 7-21 carbon atoms on average
and R
12 and R
13 denote individually a hydrogen atom, 2-hydroxyethyl group or 2-hydroxypropyl group.
[0016] In this invention, (A) and (B) are used to give an (A)/(B) weight ratio of 1/3-3/1.
If (A)/(B) exceeds 3/1, it is impossible to provide a composition having sufficiently
low irritation. It is necessary to incorporate a great deal of the component (C) in
order to render this composition low irritant, whereby problems arise with respect
to detergency and foaming property. Such an unduly large (A)/(B) ratio is therefore
not preferred. It (A)
/(B) becomes smaller than 1/3, it is impossible to obtain a composition having sufficient
stability at low temperatures. Such an unduly small (A)/(B) ratio is hence not preferred
either.
[0017] (C) and (A) are used to give a weight ratio of 1/10-1/1. If the (C)/(A) ratio is
smaller than 1/10, it is impossible to obtain a low irritant composition although
sufficient washing and cleaning power and foaming power are obtained. On the other
hand, any (C)/(A) ratios greater than 1/1 are not preferred because problems arise
with respect to the foaming power and stability.
[0018] Further, (D), (A) and (B) are used to give a (D)/(A) + (B) weight ratio of 1/20-1/2.
If the ratio exceeds 1/2, the removal of foams is impaired. If the ratio becomes smaller
than 1
/20 on the other hand, the resulting detergent has poor foaming power and the quality
of foams is lowered. Any (D)/(A)+(B) weight ratios outside the above range are hence
not preferred.
[0019] In the composition of this invention, (A), (B), (C) and (D) are used in such amounts
that their total weight accounts for 10-40 wt.% of the whole composition. Any total
weights smaller than 10 wt.% cannot achieve sufficient foaming power, while any total
weights greater than 40 wt.% cannot provide a uniform and stable composition. Total
weights outside the above range are hence not preferred.
[0020] Besides these essential components (A), (B), (C) and (D), the detergent composition
of this invention may additional contain one or more conventional surfactants in a
total proportion of 0-10 wt.%. In addition, it is also possible to use up to a total
proportion of 0-20 wt.% a solubilizing adjuvant such as glycerin, propylene glycol,
ethanol or urea, a thickener such as a water-soluble high molecular substance, polyethylene
glycol fatty acid ester or sodium chloride, an antiseptic such as paraben, and/or
an antioxidant such as BHT for shaping and/or stabilizing purposes. It is also feasible
to use a color, a perfume base, an antidandruff agent, an antiphlogistic, vitamines,
a plant extract, and/or a protein or its derivative or decomposition product in a
total proportion of 0-5 wt.%. The remainder consists of water, whose proportion ranges
from 30 wt.% to 90 wt.%.
[0021] The detergent composition of this invention can be formed into various preparation
forms such as liquid (lotion-like) form, paste-like form and gel-like form as desired.
Its pH may be adjusted to 4-10, more preferably, to 5.5-7.5 with an acid or base as
needed.
[0022] Low irritant detergent compositions excellent 'in washing and cleaning power can
be obtained in accordance with this invention. The compositions of this invention
are beneficial, for example, as hair and skin detergents for infants, as kitchen detergents
for housewives whose hands are sensitive and susceptible to roughening, as daily shampoos
for those washing their hair everyday, and as low-irritant hair-dressing shampoos
for those unavoidably exposed as a profession to shampoo for long time.
[0023] The invention will next be described by the following Examples, in which tests were
conducted by the following methods respectively.
(1) Foaming power testing method:
[0024] (i) Artificial dirt and filth were added at a concentration of 0.5% to a 1% aqueous
solution of each detergent composition. The resultant mixture was stirred by a flat
propeller at 40 C and 1,000 rpm for 5 minutes in a cylinder while reversing the stirring
direction at every 10th seconds. Thirty seconds after completion of the stirring,
The foaming power was evaluated in terms of the volume of foams.
(ii) Feeling evaluation by wool towel:
[0025] After soaking 25 g of a wool towel with warm water (40 C), 0.5 g of each detergent
composition was applied. The towel was then drawn and squeezed through a hand. The
volume of foams was evaluated by feeling. Evaluation standard:
@: Good foaming
0: Average foaming
Δ: Slightly poor foaming
X: Poor foaming
(2) Washing and cleaning power testing method:
(i) Deliberately-soiled fabric:
[0026] Oily artificial dirt and filth were dispersed evenly in a solvent. A wool muslin
blanket was brought into contact with the dispersion, followed by drying to have the
oily artificial dirt and filth adhered on the blanket. The blanket was cut into test
pieces of 10 cm x 10 cm wide for use in testing.
(ii) Washing and cleaning conditions and method:
[0027] A detergent composition was dissolved in hard water of German hardness 15° d to prepare
1 ℓ of a 3% aqueous solution of the detergent composition. Five deliberately-soiled
fabric sheets and the aqueous solution were placed, as they were, in a stainless steel
beaker equipped with a targotometer, and were then whirled at 75 rpm, 40 C for 3 minutes
by the targotometer. After rinsing the fabric sheets under running water, they were
ironed for measurement of their reflectance.
(iii) Evaluation of washing and cleaning power:
[0028] The washing and cleaning power of each detergent composition was evaluated by comparing
it to the washing and cleaning power of a standard detergent of the following formulation:
○: At least comparable with the standard detergent
X: Inferior to the standard detergent

(3) Eye coat irritation testing method:
[0029]
(i) Primary eye coat irritation test was conducted in accordance with the standard
method of France (Journal Official Répub Francaise 24-Oct-84). Described in brief,
six rabbits were used. The right eye of each of the rabbits was brought into contact
with 0.1 m ℓ of an undiluted sample solution. Without washing the eye, it was observed
24 hours later, 48 hours later and 72 hours later respectively. Prior to each observation,
the eye was however brought into contact with sodium fluorecein, followed by washing
with physiological saline. Incidentally, the left eye was used as a control.
(ii) In order to achieve the evaluation in terms of numerical scores, the evaluation
was effected in accordance with Code of Federal Regulations of the USA, Title 16,
Section 1500.42. Described in brief, (A) the state of edema of the conjunctiva was
ranked in 4 stages, (C) the state of redness in 3 stages, (D) the state of the iris
in 2 stages, and (E) the state of opacity of the cornea in 4 stages. The eye coat
irritation index (EII) was calculated in accordance with the following equation. EII
= (A + C) x 2 + D x 5 + E x 5
[0030] Accordingly, the maximum irritation index is 44.
(4) Stability test:
[0031] Each detergent composition was stored separately at 5°C, room temperature, 40° C
and 50 C for 1 month and its external appearance, pH, viscosity and fragrance were
evaluated every week.

Examples 1-6 & Comparative Examples a-c:
[0032] Liquid detergent compositions of compositions shown in Table 1 were prepared, and
their foaming power, washing and cleaning power, stability and eye coat irritation
were evaluated. Incidentally, each composition was adjusted to pH 7.0 with a small
amount of citric acid.

Examples 7-9 & Comparative Examples d-e:
[0033] Liquid detergent compositions of formulations shown in Table 2 were separately prepared,
and their foaming power, stability, eye coat irritation and dioxane concentrations
were evaluated.

Example 10: Pearlescent Shampoo
[0034]

Example 11: Conditioning Shampoo
[0035]

When a hair conditioning shampoo was prepared in accordance with the above formulation,
it was excellent in detergency, foaming power and the feeling of use. Washed hair
was moisturized and had excellent feeling to the touch.
Example 12: Conditioning Shampoo
[0036]

When a hair conditioning shampoo was prepared in accordance with the above formulation,
it was excellent in detergency and foaming power. Washed hair was moisturized and
was superb.