| (19) |
 |
|
(11) |
EP 0 328 254 B1 |
| (12) |
EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION |
| (45) |
Mention of the grant of the patent: |
|
14.07.1993 Bulletin 1993/28 |
| (22) |
Date of filing: 19.01.1989 |
|
| (51) |
International Patent Classification (IPC)5: B63H 9/06 |
|
| (54) |
Wingsail stalling
Überziehen von Tragflügelsegeln
Mettre en perte de vitesse des voiles à profil en aile d'avion
|
| (84) |
Designated Contracting States: |
|
BE DE ES FR GB IT NL SE |
| (30) |
Priority: |
12.02.1988 GB 8803265
|
| (43) |
Date of publication of application: |
|
16.08.1989 Bulletin 1989/33 |
| (73) |
Proprietors: |
|
- WALKER, John Graham
St. Mellion
Cornwall PL12 6RS (GB)
- WALKER, Jean Margaret
St. Mellion
Cornwall PL12 6RS (GB)
|
|
| (72) |
Inventor: |
|
- Walker, John Graham
St Mellion
Cornwall PL12 6RS (GB)
|
| (74) |
Representative: Bowles, Sharon Margaret et al |
|
BOWLES HORTON
Felden House
Dower Mews
High Street Berkhamsted
Hertfordshire HP4 2BL Berkhamsted
Hertfordshire HP4 2BL (GB) |
| (56) |
References cited: :
WO-A-86/04035 DE-C- 403 416
|
WO-A-86/06342
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Note: Within nine months from the publication of the mention of the grant of the European
patent, any person may give notice to the European Patent Office of opposition to
the European patent
granted. Notice of opposition shall be filed in a written reasoned statement. It shall
not be deemed to
have been filed until the opposition fee has been paid. (Art. 99(1) European Patent
Convention).
|
[0001] This invention relates to wingsail aerofoils for land or marine vehicles and to arrangements
for stalling wingsail aerofoils.
[0002] A wingsail aerofoil is mounted and operated somewhat differently to the more familiar
aeroplane wing; it is mounted with the span upright (i.e. vertically or near vertically
extending) and the aerofoil section plane substantially horizontal, and since the
vehicle to which the wingsail is attached is supported by land or water the aerofoil
is used to supply or augment propulsive power which for practical purposes needs to
be capable of being applied in all potential directions or travel. The type of wingsail
assembly with which the present invention is principally concerned is a self-setting
or self-trimming wingsail assembly. Such a wingsail assembly comprises a set of aerofoils,
termed hereinafter a sailset, having at least one thrust wingsail that reacts the
propulsive force and is freely rotatable about an upright axis so that it can be trimmed
to different angles in accordance with the wind and desired direction of travel, and
at least one auxiliary aerofoil (usually a tail aerofoil) mounted on a boom or booms
rigidly connected to the thrust wingsail and which is used to trim the thrust wingsail
as explained hereinafter.
[0003] The thrust wingsail is of multi-element structure comprising a leading aerofoil element
and a trailing aerofoil element positioned closely behind the leading element, the
trailing element being laterally pivotable with respect to the leading element so
that a wingsail adopts an asymmetrical configuration for thrust right or left of the
wind. The trailing element can be locked in the thrusting position and released for
returning to the aligned position or to a mirror image cambered position. Generally
the axis of rotation of the sailset passes through the leading element or, in the
instance of a sailset having a multi-plane structure of a plurality of side by side
thrust wingsails, through the central plane of symmetry of the leading elements, and
the trailing element pivots independently of the main pivot axis. When the aerofoils
are all coplanar the sailset will be rotated like a weathercock to the position of
minimum resistance. If the thrust wing is then set to the thrusting configuration
by rotating and locking the trailing element the wind creates a turning moment about
the main axis. However the auxiliary aerofoil can also be independently rotated and
although much smaller it is, by virtue of its distance from the main axis, capable
of exerting a comparable moment. Thus by selection of the angular deflection of the
auxiliary aerofoil (that is selection of its moment compared with the thrust wing
moment about the main axis for a given angular deflection of the thrust wing) the
trim of the thrust wing to the wind can be selected, and upon a change of wind direction
the resulting change in the moments of the thrust wing and auxiliary aerofoil about
the main axis will cause a natural rotation of the sailset until the moments again
balance when the trim angle to the wind is restored to its original value.
[0004] The direction of travel of the vehicle with respect to prevailing wind direction
may be considered to fall into three general categories: towards the wind, broadly
across the wind, and away from or downwind, and for each of these categories different
settings with respect to the wind are preferable. In between the general categories
the best settings will be intermediate those exemplified below with respect to the
general categories.
[0005] If the vehicle is being propelled towards the wind the trim is usually adjusted to
provide the maximum possible aerodynamic efficiency, commonly termed the lift/drag
ratio; which is the ratio of the output force resolved into components at right angles
to the wind and in the direction of the wind. If the direction is across the wind
the trim is adjusted to provide the maximum force available without stalling, and
if the travel is downward then the downwind component of force is maximised, with
stalling deliberately enabled if found more effective.
[0006] The present invention is particularly concerned with multiplane sailsets and with
configurations that enable maintenance of full stall for maximum speed in running
downwind. During stalling the airflow over the aerofoils is eddying and turbulent
such that an auxiliary tail aerofil may become blanketed and to rendered less effective
in controlling the trimming of the thrust wings in stalling conditions. There may
also be an additional moment resisting achievement of full stall created by the shifting
of the create of pressure of the thrust wing downwardly away from the main rotation
axis. We have already proposed in WO 86/06342 a system in which non-central trailing
aerofoils are arranged to have an initial angular disparity with their trailing edges
inclined inwardly towards the central plane of symmetry. This initial angular disparity
is maintained as the trailing section is deflected so that the thrust wing on the
inside curve of the camber (the windward side) is less deeply stalled than the leeward
thrust wing, with the result that the deeper stalling of the leeward wing tends to
hold the sailset in stall. However it is not always desirable to have an angular disparity
in the symmetrical position, or it may be preferred to vary the degree of disparity
as the trailing section deflection varies.
[0007] Accordingly the invention provides a wingsail arrangement comprising a plurality
of thrust wings each of which comprises an upright leading aerofoil having a leading
edge and a trailing edge and an upright trailing aerofoil having a leading edge and
a trailing edge the leading edge of the trailing aerofoil being positioned closely
behind the trailing edge of the leading aerofoil and means for mounting the trailing
aerofoil for pivoting movement about an upright axis relative to the leading aerofoil
from an aligned position in which the trailing aerofoil is aligned coplanar with the
leading aerofoil to positions to each side of and angularly displaced from the aligned
position, and in which the simultaneous respective angular displacements of at least
two trailing aerofoils from their coplanar position are different, characterised in
that the arrangement includes means for controlling at least two of the trailing aerofoils
for respectively greater and lesser rotation as they are angularly displaced from
the aligned position.
[0008] The invention is now described by way of example with reference to the accompanying
drawings in which:
Figure 1 illustrates for the purpose of explanation a plan view of a single plane
wingsail sailset;
Figure 2 illustrates for the purpose of explanation a schematic perspective view of
part of a thrust wing assembly;
Figure 3 is a schematic plan of twin plane thrust wings;
Figure 4 illustrates an embodiment of the invention on twin plane thrust wings shown
in the symmetrical position;
Figure 5 illustrates the thrust wings of Figure 4 in an angularly deflected configuration
set to thrust right of the wind.
[0009] Referring to Figure 1, the main parts of a wingsail sailset are shown schematically
in plan view. For simplicity a single plane thrust wing is illustrated, however the
present invention concerns thrust wings that are multiplane as shown in Figures 3
to 5. A main thrust wing is composed of a leading element 1 and a trailing element
(termed a flap) 2. The flap 2 is pivotable from side to side about a pivot axis 3
located within the leading section 1, the flap being connected to the pivot axis 3
by a series of hinge arms 4 illustrated more clearly in Figure 2. The pivot axis 3
may not be continuous axis, it may comprise a series of aligned axes associated with
respective hinge arms 4. A small slat (not shown) that forms an extension to the trailing
edge of the leading element 1 when the trailing section 2 is pivoted out of alignment
with the leading element 1 is preferably provided. Such a slat is the subject of my
U.S. patents 4,467,741 and 4,563,970.
[0010] A tail aerofoil 11 is pivotally mounted about axis 5 on booms 6, usually provided
towards or at the top and bottom of the thrust wings, the booms being rigidly connected
to the leading element 1. Hydraulic or pneumatic cylinders 7, 8 or other movement
mechanisms are provided for respectively rotating the flap 2 and tail about their
pivot axes 3 and 5, these fluid cylinder or other mechanisms may conveniently be mounted
on the booms 6 which also form an end plate assembly. A counterbalance 9 for the tail
is also provided so that the sailset is mass balanced about an axis 10, about which
the sailset is freely rotatable. In order to dynamically balance the sailset the counterbalance
is located at approximately half height on the leading element although some inertial
response advantage can be gained by locating the counterbalance a little below the
half height.
[0011] A multiplane sailset comprises the same elements as shown and described with reference
to Figure 1 but, as shown in Figures 3 to 5 has a plurality of sets of thrust wings,
each having a leading element 1 and flap 2 of the structure shown in Figure 2. A single
auxiliary tail aerofoil (not shown in Figures 3 to 5) is still usually employed although
multiple auxiliary aerofoils may be used. If the multi-plane sailset has an odd number
of thrust wings the central structure is similar to that shown in Figure 1 with the
main axis 10 aligned with the central leading section. For an even number of thrust
wings the main axis 10 will lie midway between the innermost leading sections. The
thrust wings of a multiplane sailset may be linked so that one flap (usually the flap
on a central wing of an odd numbered multiplane) is controlled as a master with the
rest driven as slaves, or alternatively each flap may be separately driven with the
drives controlled so that whether by virtue of physical interconnection or by a control
mechanism the flaps are moved in unison.
[0012] Figure 3 illustrates a twin plane set of thrust wings, each thrust wings comprising
a leading element 1 and a trailing flap element 2. The flaps 2 are each pivotable
about an axis 3 located on the centre chord of the respective leading elements, so
that each flap is capable of being angularly deflected laterally to each side of its
respective leading element. The spacing of the leading element is preferably fixed
and maintained by members interconnecting the two leading elements at intervals in
the upright direction, so that the leading elements are maintained parallel to one
another.
[0013] The known arrangements are for the flaps to be maintained parallel to one another,
so that the angular deflection of each flap relative to its leading element is the
same, or for an initial flap trailing edge inward angular disparity that is maintained
during deflection so that the leeward wing (outside of the camber) is more deeply
stalled by the extent of the initial angular disparity.
[0014] In an embodiment of the invention shown in Figures 4 and 5 the flaps are linked so
that they are parallel in the central non-deflected position but exhibit differing
degrees of angular deflection when deflected so that the leeward flap is at a greater
angle. Figure 4 shows the in line configuration, the leading aerofoils being rigidly
connected parallel to each other and the spacing of the flaps 2 being maintained parallel
and coplanar with the leading aerofoils by a link 14 that is pivotally connected at
15 to respective arms 16 attached to the trailing edges of the flaps. The arms 16
are inwardly directed towards the plane of symmetry of the sailset so that the length
of the link 14 is less than the distance between the respective chord planes of the
wings.
[0015] Considering now Figure 5 which shows the flaps angularly deflected towards the wind
(shown by the arrow) the leeward flap 2a is deflected through an angle α, but the
windward flap 2b is deflected through an smaller angle β due to the non-parallelogram
linkage formed between the hinge axes 3 of the flaps and the pivotal connections 15
on the arms. The precise angular difference between α and β depends upon the geometry
of the quadrilateral joining the hinge axes 3 and pivotal connections 15, and the
length of the arms 16 and linkage 14 are selected according to the desired angular
disparity at full flap deflection. It will be realised that at less than full flap
deflection the angular disparity will be intermediate that at zero deflection, i.e.
in the symmetrical position (which is zero angular disparity in Figure 5) and that
at full flap deflection (usually of the order of 2° per wing in about 40° of deflection).
[0016] The non parallel linkage principle described with reference to the embodiments of
Figures 4 and 5 may be utilised in combination with a non-deflected flap setting in
which there is an initial angular disparity, in which case this initial angular disparity
plus the linkage geometry will determine the final angular disparity in the fully
deflected position of the flap. An initial angular disparity in combination with non-parallel
linkage need not only have the flap trailing edges convergent, settings may be chosen
in which the zero deflection (symmetrical position) has the trailing edges of the
flaps divergent.
[0017] In a similar embodiment for a three wing system, the linkages are arranged so that
at full deflection the angles of deflection are +38°, +40° and +42° or on the opposite
tack angles of -38°, -40° and -42°. For configurations with four or more wings, pairs
of wings may have linkages with differing non-parallel linkages to maintain a leeward
progression to deeper stalling.
[0018] The leading aerofoils have been described as spaced with their chord lines parallel,
but it should be realised that it is possible for departures from parallel to be made
so that the chordal planes of the leading aerofoils are divergent or convergent as
compared with the parallel arrangement. The deflection control arrangements may also
be utilized on thrust wings that are not rotated by an auxiliary or tail aerofoil.
1. A wingsail arrangement comprising a plurality of thrust wings each of which comprises
an upright leading aerofoil (1) and an upright trailing aerofoil (2), the leading
edge of the trailing aerofoil being positioned closely behind the trailing edge of
the leading aerofoil, means for mounting the trailing aerofoil for pivoting movement
about an upright axis (3) relative to the leading aerofoil from an aligned position
in which the trailing aerofoil is aligned coplanar with the leading aerofoil to positions
to each side of and angularly displaced from the aligned position, and in which the
simultaneous respective angular displacements of at least two trailing aerofoils from
their coplanar position are different, characterised in that the arrangement includes
means for controlling at least two of the trailing aerofoils for respectively greater
and lesser rotation as they are angularly displaced from the aligned position
2. A wingsail arrangement according to claim 1 in which said means for controlling comprises
a non-parallelogram mechanical linkage (14,15,16).
3. A wingsail arrangement according to claim 1 or claim 2 in which the mechanical linkage
comprises a respective member (16) rigidly attached to each of the trailing aerofoils
of said pair and extending towards the other of said pair and a rigid link (14) pivotally
connected to each member.
4. A wingsail arrangement according to any preceding claim comprising two thrust wings.
5. A wingsail arrangement according to any of claims 1 to 3 comprising at least three
thrust wings.
6. A wingsail arrangement according to any preceding claim in which said means for controlling
provides a progressive angular disparity in the trailing aerofoils of said plurality
when they are angularly displaced from the aligned position with that trailing aerofoil
that is on the windward side being least angularly displaced.
1. Flügelsegelanordnung mit einer Anzahl von Vortriebsflügeln, mit jeweils einer aufrecht
stehenden vorderen Tragfläche (1) und einer aufrecht stehenden hinteren Tragfläche
(2), wobei die Vorderkante der hinteren Tragfläche dicht hinter der Hinterkante der
vorderen Tragfläche angeordnet ist, und mit Mitteln zur Lagerung der hinteren Tragfläche
für eine Schwenkbewegung um eine aufrechte Achse (3), relativ zur vorderen Tragfläche
aus einer fluchtenden Position, in welcher die hintere Tragfläche koplanar mit der
vorderen Tragfläche ausgerichtet ist, in von der fluchtenden Positionauf nach jeder
Seite abgewinkelte Stellungen, wobei die gleichzeitigen Abwinkelungen von wenigstens
zwei hinteren Tragflächen aus der koplanaren Position unterschiedlich groß sind,
dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß
die Anordnung Mittel zum Steuern von wenigstens zwei der hinteren Tragflächen aufweist,
derart, daß sie eine größere bzw. kleinere Drehbewegung bei ihrer Winkelversetzung
aus der fluchtenden Position heraus durchführen.
2. Flügelsegelanordnung nach Anspruch 1,
in welchem die Mittel zum Steuern eine nicht-parallelogrammförmiges mechanische Lenkeranordnung
(14, 15, 16) umfassen.
3. Flügelsegelanordnung nach Anspruch 1 oder 2,
in welchem die mechanische Lenkeranordnung je ein mit jeder der hinteren Tragflächen
des Paares fest verbundenes Element (16), das sich zur anderen Tragfläche des Paares
erstreckt, und ein starres Kopplungsglied (14), das mit jedem der Elemente schwenkbar
verbunden ist, auweist.
4. Flügelsegelanordnung nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche mit zwei Vortriebsflügeln.
5. Flügelsegelanordnung nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 3 mit wenigstens drei Vortriebsflügeln.
6. Flügelsegelanordnung nach einem der vorangehenden Ansprüche,
in welchem die Mittel zur Steuerung einen progressiven Winkelunterschied der hinteren
Tragflächen bewirken, wenn diese aus der fluchtenden Position winkelversetzt werden,
wobei diejenige hintere Tragfläche, die auf der Luvseite liegt, am wenigsten winkelversetzt
wird.
1. Dispositif de voilure comprenant une pluralité d'ailes de poussée, comprenant chacune
une aile avant verticale (1) et une aile arrière verticale (2), le bord d'attaque
de l'aile arrière étant situé très près de l'arrière du bord de fuite de l'aile avant,
des moyens pour monter l'aile arrière pivotante autour d'un axe vertical (3) par rapport
à l'aile avant à partir d'une position alignée dans laquelle l'aile arrière est dans
le même plan que l'aile avant jusqu'à des positions situées de chaque côté et inclinées
sous un certain angle par rapport à la position alignée, les déplacements angulaires
respectifs simultanés d'au moins deux ailes arrière à partir de leur position dans
un même plan étant différents, caractérisé en ce qu'il comprend des moyens pour commander
au moins deux ailes arrière pour leur faire subir une rotation respectivement plus
grande et plus petite que leur déplacement angulaire depuis la position alignée.
2. Dispositif de voilure selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que lesdits moyens
de commande comprennent une articulation mécanique qui est différente d'un parallèlogramme
(14,15,16).
3. Dispositif de voilure selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 ou 2, caractérisé
en ce que l'articulation mécanique comprend un élément (16) respectivement attaché
de façon rigide à chacune des deux ailes arrière et orienté vers l'autre aile arrière
et une bielle rigide (14) reliée de façon pivotante à chaque élément.
4. Dispositif de voilure selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, caractérisé
en ce qu'il comprend deux ailes de poussée.
5. Dispositif de voilure selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 3, caractérisé
en ce qu'il comprend au moins trois ailes de poussée.
6. Dispositif de voilure selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, caractérisé
en ce que lesdits moyens de commande engendrent une disparité angulaire progressive
des ailes arrière de ladite pluralité quand elles sont déplacées angulairement depuis
la position alignée, l'aile arrière qui est au vent étant moins déplacée angulairement.

