(19) |
 |
|
(11) |
EP 0 331 662 A1 |
(12) |
EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION |
(43) |
Date of publication: |
|
06.09.1989 Bulletin 1989/36 |
(22) |
Date of filing: 06.03.1989 |
|
(51) |
International Patent Classification (IPC)4: F15B 21/04 |
|
(84) |
Designated Contracting States: |
|
AT BE CH DE ES FR GB GR IT LI LU NL SE |
(30) |
Priority: |
04.03.1988 SE 8800787
|
(71) |
Applicant: EC-MASKIN AB |
|
S-212 19 Malmö (SE) |
|
(72) |
Inventor: |
|
- Persson, Elerth
S-245 00 Staffanstorp (SE)
|
(74) |
Representative: Onn, Thorsten et al |
|
AB STOCKHOLMS PATENTBYRA,
Zacco & Bruhn,
Box 23101 104 35 Stockholm 104 35 Stockholm (SE) |
|
|
|
(54) |
Sound and vibration damping apparatus |
(57) Device for the damping of vibrations, blows and noise in hydraulic transmissions,
at which oil pipes with varying pressure or pulsating flow in the system each are
connected to one through a heavy block of cast iron going duct. The duct through the
block has a greater diameter than the connecting pipes. Furthermore the duct is angled.
|

|
[0001] For driving and controlling of working machines of the type loader, digging machines
and the like today in an increasing extent different types of hydraulic transmissions
are used. This gives considerable advantages regarding wear, controllability etc.
Since the machines however become larger and larger even the pumps required for the
hydraulic driving get bigger. For instance cog-wheel pumps are used since they in
comparison to their capacity can be fabricated at comparatively low costs. These as
well as other pumps however have the disadvantage that they do not deliver an absolutely
even flow but pulsations, vibrations and even blows occur, the latter in particular
when very high pressures are used. These phenomenas give rise to vibrations as well
as noise, which are not only disturbing for the driver and the environment but also
increase the strains on the machine. A possible way to solve this problem is of course
to provide pulsation equalizers. These are however very expensive in particular since
the working pressure is high, that is a couple of hundred kp/cm². In this connection
it must also be considered that it for each machine not only is a question of one
pump but it is frequently a question of two or three pumps that in this way need to
be vibration damped.
[0002] In view of the above problem the object of the invention is to eliminate vibrations
and blows in the hydraulic system in a simple manner.
[0003] This object is in accordance with the invention simply solved by connecting one or
more hydraulic pipe in the respective system that is to be damped to a channel in
a heavy mass. The large mass can for instance be constituted by a cast iron block
or the like in which has been bored a required number of holes. As is apparent this
is a comparatively low cost solution even if the block may weigh several tenth of
kilos. In any case the cost will only be a fraction of what is the case with conventional
pressure and vibrational equalizers. The physical background of why the damping in
accordance with the invention works so well is at the moment of writing not known
but practical experiments have confirmed the function.
[0004] The invention is of course not appliable in all cases where hydraulic pumps and engines
are used but for the heavy and great working machines as well as stationary hydraulic
machines a hundred kilos in addition or not makes no difference and in some cases
there is even a desire to increase the weight of the machine.
[0005] The block used for sound damping can at the same time constitute a counter weight.
[0006] Further preferable developments of the invention has been submitted in the subclaims
and are apparent from the following description of an embodiment of the invention.
[0007] In the drawing is shown a cast iron block with a weight of about 130 kilos. In this
has from two longitudinal sides that are angled relative each other holes with a diameter
of 24 mm been bored so that they meet each other and constitute in total four right
angled or ducts. To these have then been connected 3/4 inch connections and the oil
pipes to and from driving and controlling means respectively run through these channels
or ducts.
[0008] The shown block was mounted directly in the frame of the digger loader that previously
in the driving cabine had a sound level of 90 db. The sound level was then measured
once again and did now turn out to be 71,6 db, that is a considerable damping. It
should in this connection also be mentioned that the driving cabine itself was fastened
directly in the frame of the machine. Even with the block lying loosely on the ground
but connected to the machinery damping was obtained. The different ducts were connected
to different controling and driving means on the machine and the damping seemed to
be just as good for respective part of noice or part vibrations in respective pipes
independent of if they coincided with each other or not. The block could with other
words simultaneously damp several different vibrations that also could have different
pressure levels. In other words the block can replace a number of expensive pressure
equalizers and it need perhaps not be mentioned that the wear resistance of the block
is infinitely superior to that of the pressure equalizers. In the tested case the
block was placed in the front end of the machine and it is presumably conceivable
that the block in some cases constitutes a swinging unit generating vibrations that
in turn can be transmitted to the frame again in such a way that these can be used
to annhilate that generated of the machinery.
[0009] Preferably the block is heavy so that its enertia forces will become great in comparison
to the hydraulic forces and vibrations that are to be damped. Furthermore the material
of the block is great, high density and preferably itself sound and vibration damping
respectively. As have been mentioned above a good function has been achieved with
angled ducts. It is possibly also conceivable that the effect may be improved by further
angles respectively a longer passage for the duct in the block. If a material with
a lower density is used good effects can perhaps be achieved with a larger block.
[0010] In the shown embodiment only one block has been used for all the pipes or connections
that need to be vibrationaly damped. It is of course also conceivable to arrange
different blocks at different places on the machine if this is practical. Presumably
one is then forced to have comparatively heavy masses for the damping at all places.
[0011] The angled ducts in the embodiment are presumably not necessary. Perhaps however
the function is improved if so to say the vibration transfer from the hydraulic pipe
to the material of the block is faciliated by disruption in the hydraulic line in
one way or the other either by means of angles or throttles. For instance a good damping
is also achieved if a hydraulic branched pipe is connected to a blind hole in the
material.
1. Device for damping of vibrations, blows and noise in connection with hydraulic
transmissions, characterized in that one or more oil pipes in the system are connected to a duct going through a
heavy block.
2. Device according to claim 1, characterized in that the duct through block has a larger diameter than the connecting pipes.
3. Device according to any of the previous claims characterized in that the duct is angled.
4. Device according to any of the previous claims characterized in that the block is made of cast iron.
5. Device according to any of the previous claims characterized in that several ducts are arranged in the same block.
6. Device according to any of the previous claims characterized in that the block or the mass is mounted directly on the frame of the machine the hydraulic
transmission of which is to be sound damped.
7. Device according to any of the previous claims characterized in that the block is fabricated of an unyielding material or one with a high density.
8. Device according to any of the previous claims characterized in that the block is massive.
