CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
[0001] The present invention is an improvement over that disclosed in Musante et al Application
Serial No. 098,633 filed September 18, 1987 entitled ACTIVE SPALL SUPPRESSION ARMOR.
(European Application 88 113 787.1)
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Field of the Invention
[0002] The present invention relates to the reduction of injury and damage from the spall
typically generated off the inside surface of armor plate or the like, by contiguously
attaching light weight spall backing material having a sonic impedance such that the
stress reflected into the armor is below that which causes significant spallation
in the armor. The lightweight backing is frangible or of low strength such that when
it fractures, the particles are of low mass and/or kinetic energy and of minimal concentration
capability.
Description of the Prior Art
[0003] It is well recognized that spall is a primary cause of armor vehicle kills during
combat. Spall may be characterized as a cloud of high velocity fragments of metal
which is released from the inside surface of the vehicle's armored hull and is lethal
to soft targets inside the vehicle. The soft targets include electrical cables, electrical
components, fuel lines, fuel cells, and personnel within the vehicle.
[0004] Spall liners consisting of aramid fiber reinforced polymer panels are currently being
used for minimizing the spall effect, but are quite expensive and heavy. Application
of these liners is hindered by limited space in vehicles and the low space efficiency
of the liners. The effectiveness of these liners require that the liners be spaced
from typically about 4 to 17 inches from the inner wall of the vehicle and are therefore
undesirable since the useable space within most vehicles is quite limited. Also, the
hardware within the vehicles makes it difficult or impossible to secure the liner
within all portions of the vehicle without interfering with the operation and location
of vehicle components. Significant areas in vehicles, such as turret and driver areas,
have spall protection which is either limited or non-existent due to lack of space
for any standoff.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0005] In general, active spall suppression armor includes an armor material or plate backed
by a spall backing material which is contiguously attached to the inside surface of
the armor, typically by adhesives. The spall backing material may be of the consistency
of pliable putty, or may be in the form of hard, soft, or elastic tiles or sheets.
In the event that the spall backing consists of a uniform dispersion of particles
in a binder matrix, the matrix binder may serve to contiguously adhere the backing
material to the armor. The spall material when fractured, due to stresses transmitted
through the armor material, forms nonlethal fragments of low mass and kinetic energy.
The sonic impedance of the spall material is such that the stress reflected by the
spall backing material into the armor is below that which causes failure in the armor,
which failure would result in lethal spall particles being propelled from the inner
surface of the metal armor. Spall may be created in the backing material but the effect
is minimized by assuring that the spall created in the backing material has low energy
and is therefore of limited penetration capability. The armor material may be steel
armor, aluminum armor, and other types of armor including composite materials.
[0006] The improved active spall suppression armor is directed to the use of different types
of either monolithic or composite materials in contact with the armor plate, used
alone or with a secondary layer or plate spaced therefrom.
[0007] In particular, the improved active spall suppression system performs better than
present spall liners where minimal space is available, typically under four inches.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0008]
Figure 1 is a perspective in section illustrating an armor plate without spall backing
material attached thereto being impacted by a shaped charge, or projectile, and showing
armor spall being discharged therefrom.
Figure 2 is a diagrammatic elevation of a military vehicle illustrating a projectile
passing through the two armor walls and two spall liners of a prior art vehicle illustrating
spall cone angles.
Figure 3 is a diagrammatic elevation in vertical section illustrating an armor plate
with spall backing material attached to a test stand, and a witness sheet attached
to a frame.
Figure 4 is a diagrammatic elevation illustrating a saw-toothed stress wave created
in the armor by the impact of a shaped charge explosive at four separate time intervals
relative to the free inner surface of the metal armor.
Figure 5A is a diagram illustrating the saw toothed stress waves at an interface between
an armor plate and a backing material having a lower sonic impedance than that of
the armor plate.
Figure 5B is a diagram illustrating the saw-toothed stress waves at an interface between
an armor plate and a backing material having a greater sonic impedance than the armor
plate.
Figure 6 is a vertical section taken through an armor plate having a spall backing
material contiguously attached thereto by an optional interlayer.
Figure 7A is a copy of a photograph illustrating the back of an armor test plate without
spall backing illustrating the area from which armor spall has been released and further
illustrating a hole therein formed by the shaped charge jet.
Figure 7B is a copy of a photograph illustrating the front of a witness plate illustrating
the usual pattern of holes formed therein from spall from the armor plate of Figure
7A and the slug from the shaped charge slug, respectively.
Figure 8 is a vertical section through an improved single layer spall suppression
system, the dotted lines indicating that the backing material may be used in the form
of a single plate or a plurality of plates.
Figure 9 is a vertical section through an improved double layer spall suppression
system similar to Figure 8 but having a secondary plate or sheet spaced from the backing
material.
Figure 10 is a copy of a back lighted photograph of the front of a witness plate,
at reduced scale, illustrating the results of a TOW 11 shot through an unbacked armor
plate of 1.75" 5083 aluminum and showing the usual circular pattern of holes formed
from lethal spall and a central hole formed by the jet and slug of the weapon when
shot at 0°.
Figure 11 is a copy of a back lighted photograph with test conditions the same as
Fig. 10 but of a witness plate illustrating the results of a test shot through an
armor plate backed by a single layer of 4.5 PSF aramid fiber backing material at 4"
spacing and showing a hole formed by the slug but very few holes formed by spall.
Figure 12 is a copy of a back lighted photograph of the front of a witness plate with
test conditions the same as Figure 10 but illustrating the results of a test shot
through the armor plate having a 4.3 PSF single layer of backing material attached
thereto, and a hole formed by the slug with a slightly larger amount of holes formed
by spall.
Figure 13 is a copy of a back lighted photograph of the front of a witness plate with
test conditions the same as Figure 10 but illustrating the results of a shot through
the armor plate having a 2.8 PSF single layer of primary backing material attached
thereto and a 1.5 PSF aramid fiber plate spaced 2 inches from the primary backing
material showing the hole formed by the slug plus two holes of lethal spall believed
to be formed by fragments from the slug.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
[0009] In order to better understand the improved active spall suppression armor of the
present invention, Applicant, who is a co-inventor of cross-referenced Application
Serial No. 098,633, has included herein the general theory of operation along with
definitions of terms, formulas, tables and sample calculations which appear in the
cross-referenced application. The improved armor of the present invention begins at
the title IMPROVED ACTIVE SPALL SUPPRESSION ARMOR.
[0010] Prior to describing the active spall suppression armor 18 of the present invention,
it is believed that a brief description of spallation would be helpful.
[0011] Figure 1 diagrammatically illustrates a section of metal armor 20, without a spall
backing material attached thereto, being contacted by a weapon 22 which may be a shaped
charge or a high velocity projectile. The weapon 22 contacts an outer surface 23 of
the armor with sufficient force to dislodge spall fragments 24 from the free or inner
surface 26 of the armor 20. The spall fragments are propelled from the inner surface
26 of the armor along a conical path of about 100° at high velocity with many of the
fragments being of sufficient mass to be highly penetrating to soft targets that are
contacted by the fragments. More particularly, spalling is a failure mode wherein
fracture occurs near the free surface 26 (Fig. 1) remote from the outer surface 23
where an impulse load is applied. The impulse load is typically generated by an explosive
detonation from a shaped charge, or by the impact of a high velocity projectile. The
impulse induces a compressive shock wave which propagates to the opposite free surface
26 where it reflects as a tensile wave. The intensity of the tensile wave will increase
as it propagates back through the material. At some distance from the surface 26,
the stress intensity exceeds the threshold required for initiation and fracture at
which time spallation occurs discharging the spall 24 inwardly at high velocity.
[0012] Figure 2 diagrammatically illustrates a vertical section through two armor plate
walls 28,29 of a vehicle having two prior art spall liners 32,34 spaced inwardly of
the vehicle. The path 36 of the projectile is illustrated by arrows as passing through
both walls 28,29 and liners 32,34. However, a primary spall cone angle in the first
contacted wall 28 indicates that the first spall liner 32 stops some spall but allows
larger high velocity pieces to pass through and be stopped by a second spall liner
34 as illustrated by a narrow secondary spall cone 38.
[0013] Figure 4 represents stresses caused by shaped charge weapons and illustrates the
formation of compressive and tensile waves when passing through the first contacted
armor at four separate time intervals to the free surface 26 without spall backing
material attached thereto. At time T-1 a saw-tooth wave or pulse 39 illustrates the
stress intensity relative to the back or inner surface 26 of the armor caused by the
detonation of an explosive. As illustrated at time T-2, when the compressive wave
39 reaches the free surface 26 it reflects as a tensile wave 42, which is partially
cancelled by the incident compressive pulse 39. The tensile stress will increase until
the maximum stress occurs at a distance from the surface 26 of the plate 20 equal
to one-half of the pulse length as indicated at time T-3. At time T-4 the intensity
of the tensile wave exceeds the compressive wave thus indicating that spall will not
be created.
[0014] When a projectile, as opposed to an explosive detonation or a shaped charge, applies
the impact load, a square wave (not shown) is produced which will provide no tensile
stress until the maximum occurs at the half pulse distance at T-3 of Figure 4.
[0015] The creation of spall fracture is dependent upon both the magnitude and duration
of stress. Sufficient time at the sufficient stress are required to first nucleate
cracks, and then to grow the cracks. Fracture is therefore dependent upon amplitude
and the shape of the stress pulse. When the condition of stress intensity and time
are such that the criterion for fracture are met, then the spall will be formed. When
fracture occurs, the strain energy remaining in the material between the fracture
and the rear face is released as kinetic energy and the spall particles fly from the
rear face, usually with significant velocity. The velocity is limited theoretically
by the equation: V = 2M/DC where M is the magnitude of the stress wave, D is the density
of the material, and C is the material sound speed.
Interaction of Stress Waves at Interfaces
[0016] When a stress wave encounters an interface or free surface between two dissimilar
materials such as the armor plate material 20 (Figs. 5A,5B and 6) and the spall backing
material 40, the stress waves behavior becomes more complex. The simplest situation
is a normal impact by a projectile with a diameter of the same order of magnitude
as the armor plate thickness. The stress wave can then be considered to have a planar
front and to travel perpendicular to the face of the plate. In general, when this
wave reaches an interface, one wave is reflected and another is transmitted. The intensities
of the waves are dependent upon the relative sonic impedances of the two materials.
[0017] The sonic impedance (Z) of a material is the product of the sound speed (c) in the
material, and its density (D). The values of density and sound speed are not constant,
but vary to some degree with pressure. Consequently, impedance can vary with the pressure
and will definitely change when the yield strength of a material is exceeded. Generally,
for most fully dense, elastic materials, the impedance below the yield point is relatively
constant. The density, sound speed, and impedance are listed in Table 1 for a number
of common materials. The intensities of the transmitted and reflected waves from a
stress wave impinging an internal interface are given by the following equations:
A
[0018] R =
I(D₂ C₂ - D₁ C₁) / (D₂ C₂ + D₁ C₁)
and;
T =
I(2D₁ C₁) / (D₂ C₂ - D₁ C₁)
or;
R = I(Z₂-Z₁) / (Z₂ + Z₁)
and;
T = I(2Z₁) / (Z₂ - Z₁)
where;
R = REFLECTED WAVES
T = TRANSMITTED WAVES
I = INCIDENT WAVES
Z = IMPEDANCE OF THE MATERIAL
D = DENSITY
and where subscript;
1 = the armor material
2 = the spall backing material
[0019] By convention, compressive stress has a positive value and tensile stress has a negative
value.
[0020] From the above equations, a compressive wave will reflect as a tensile wave in the
armor material if the second layer or backing material has a lower impedance, as illustrated
in Figure 5A; and as a compressive wave if the backing material has a higher impedance
as illustrated in Figure 5B. The amplitude of the reflected tensile wave will always
be less than or equal to that of the incident compressive wave.
[0021] The relative intensity of the reflected wave in the armor material is related to
the relative impedance of the spall backing material as follows:
[0022] For an impedance ratio (n) of the armor material the following equations apply: n
= Z₂/Z₁.
R/
I = (Z₂ - Z₁) / (Z₂ + Z₁) = nZ₁ - Z₁ / (nZ₁ + Z₁)
or;
R/
I (n-1) / (n+l)
[0023] This ratio is tabulated in Table 2 to illustrate how a second layer, or backing material
40 (Fig. 6), can be used to reduce the magnitude of the reflected stress. It can be
seen that a material with only one-fifth of the impedance of the first layer (armor
material) can reduce the reflected tensile stress by as much as 33 percent.
TABLE 2
Reduction in the reflected tensile stress for a given relative impedance of a layer
of backing material. |
Impedance Ratio n |
% Reduction in Reflected Tensile Stress |
.10 |
18 |
.20 |
33 |
.30 |
46 |
.40 |
57 |
.50 |
67 |
.60 |
75 |
.70 |
82 |
.80 |
89 |
.90 |
95 |
1.00 |
100 |
[0024] When the spall suppression armor 18 (Fig. 6) of the present invention is to be used
on light weight armored vehicles, as well as heavy armored vehicles, it is of course
desirable to minimize any added weight to the vehicle. Accordingly, the spall backing
material is not designed to completely suppress fractures in the spall backing material
40 by all known weapons but is designed to provide backing material which, if fractured,
will fracture into low energy, particles of low penetration capability when the armored
plate and backing material are contacted by a weapon, either a shaped charge weapon
or a projectile. It is, of course, understood that the backing material may be thickened
or be in layers of the same or different backing materials if added weight is not
a problem.
[0025] The concept of the subject invention involves the backing of armor plate 20 with
a backing material 40, or a series of backing materials, which must satisfy two conditions.
First, the impedance of the backing material must be such that the stress reflected
into the armor plate 20 is below that which would cause spall-type failure in the
armor plate. Second, the fragments from the fracture of the backing material, caused
by transmitted stress, must be nonlethal, that is, of low mass and/or velocity. Varying
impedance in the backing material may be used to condition the stress wave in the
backing material to control fragmentation. The impedance may be varied by either layering
or by controlling the material properties continuously through their thicknesses.
[0026] A preliminary design analysis was made for identifying the relationship between design
variables and system weights. First, the amount of the stress wave which must be transmitted
into the spall backing material was estimated by comparing spall strength to the stresses
involved in jet penetration. With this data, the properties of the spall backing material
was determined.
[0027] The weapons used were shaped charge TOW-II with a jet impacting aluminum armor. A
2009 GPa (giga pascals ) shock stress was generated with a pulse time length of 1.175
microseconds, which shock stress was calculated from the jet diameter divided by the
sound speed in 5083 for MIL-A-46027G(MR) aluminum having a thickness of one inch.
It was assumed that the aluminum had about the same spall "strength" as steel, the
stress is so much higher in the aluminum than its strength, that essentially the full
amplitude of the stress wave must be transmitted into the backing material.
[0028] The relationship between the impedance of the backing material 40 and the areal density
AD required to suppress spall in the aluminum armor was derived as follows:
Let:
I
ns = stress pulse wavelength in the backing material
I
al = stress pulse wavelength in the aluminum
c
ns = wave velocity in the backing material
c
al = wave velocity in the aluminum
th = minimum thickness of any backing material for passage of the full stress wave
d = diameter of the shaped charge jet
D
ns = density of the backing material
t
al = time length of the stress wave in the aluminum
Z
ns = sonic impedance of the backing material
AD
x = minimum areal density of backing material "x" for passage of the full stress wave
The wavelength of the stress pulse in the aluminum armor can be estimated by:
t
al = d/c
al
I
al = t
alc
al = d
The wavelength in the backing material is:
I
ns = I
al(c
ns/c
al)
Assuming that the backing material will separate from the aluminum when the stress
wave reaches the interface after reflecting in tension from the backface of the backing
material (because the interface cannot support significant tensile stress), and that
conservatively, the whole wave should pass into the backing material:
I
ns = 2th or th = (1/2)I
ns
Combining the above three equations gives the minimum backing material thickness for
any given material:
th = (d/2)c
ns/c
al
The minimum areal density (AD) of the backing system can be calculated as follows:
AD = D
nsth = D
ns[(d/2)c
ns/c
al] = D
nsc
ns[(d/2)c
al] (Equation 1)
Since Z
ns =D
nsc
ns:
AD = Z
ns[(D/2)c
al] (Equation 2)
Since the jet diameter, d, and the aluminum wave velocity, c
al, are constant for any given case, the minimum areal density of a backing system is
linearly related to its impedance. If again it is conservatively assumed that there
must be no reflected tensile wave in the aluminum, then the optimum backing material
areal density will be when the Impedance of the backing material matches that of the
aluminum.
Sample calculations
[0029] Assuming a 3/8 inch jet diameter vs. aluminum armor with aluminum as a backing material
(matched Impedance), optimum areal density can be calculated as follows:
Using equation (1):
AD
al = D
al[(d/2)(c
al/c
al)] = D
al(d/2)
For aluminum, D
ns = 14 lb/ft², which yields:
AD
al = 2.625 lb/ft²
The fired alumina, which worked well in the preliminary testing, would yield an optimum
from equation (2) (considering that Z
alumina/Z
al = 2.33):
AD
alumina = 2.625(2.33) = 6.116 lb/ft²
The above calculations indicate that aluminum would be a lighter backing material
than the fully-fired alumina. However, the aluminum is not frangible. While the aluminum
backing material would successfully extract the stress wave from the aluminum armor
plate or hull structure of a vehicle, the aluminum backing material could itself produce
highly penetrating spall.
[0030] This design methodology also suggests the merits of a metallic or ceramic particle
loaded polymer. In this case, the individual particles may have a higher sonic impedance
than that of the armor. However, when the particles are combined with a polymer, the
particle content must be sufficient to insure that the particle/polymer blend has
an impedance value sufficient to reduce the reflected tensile stress below that required
to form spall. A particle/polymer blend may also afford the advantage of sticking
directly to the armor without the need of an intermediate adhesive.
[0031] A low density strength solid which fractures in a brittle manner, and which has a
suitable impedance, may also be used. For instance, solid, polycrystalline sodium
chloride (NaCl) in a 1/2 inch thickness has suppressed spall formation in aluminum
armor when bonded to the back of the armor plate.
[0032] Tests have been conducted to investigate the effect of spall backing material thickness,
warhead size, obliquity, armor alloy, and armor thickness on the performance of the
various backing materials. The general procedure consists of adhesively bonding the
backing material 40 (Fig. 6) to the armor plate 20 which together comprise a piece
of active spall suppressive armor 18 in the form of a target 50 (Fig. 3). The target
is fixed to a test stand 52, and the target 50 and a witness sheet 54 are subjected
to a warhead attack. Base line targets of unbacked and liner-backed armor plates were
also tested for comparison purposes. The witness sheets 54 were placed behind the
test stand to record the distribution of spall and jet particles.
THE IMPROVED ACTIVE SPALL SUPPRESSION ARMOR
[0033] The improved active spall suppression armor of the present invention discloses two
systems for suppressing the formation of spall. A first system is a single layer system
80 (Fig. 8) which uses a single layer (or two or more thin plates to make up the single
layer) of several preselected types of spall backing material 82 that is preferably
bonded to the inner wall 84 of armor plate 86 (sometimes referred to as the target)
by an interlayer 88 of adhesive. The material used to form the spall backing system
differs from those previously described and provides improved spall suppression with
spall backing materials of reduced weight.
[0034] The second system is a double layer system 90 (Fig. 9) which bonds the same type
of spall backing material 82a to the armor plate 86a by an interlayer 88a of adhesive.
In addition, the second system includes a second plate or liner 92a spaced from the
spall backing material 80a for defeating secondary particles of the jet and armor
which are disturbed from the penetration interface by the presence of the active spall
suppression backing.
[0035] In the single layer system 80 (Fig. 8) the primary spall backing material 82 is placed
in contact with the armor plate 86 and may be bonded thereto if desired by the interlayer
88 of adhesive. Alternately, the tacky nature of the polymer matrix of the backing
material may be used as an adhesive if applied to the backing material before it is
cured. Before curing, the backing material may be sprayed or troweled onto the armor
plate. Alternately, the polymer matrix backing material may be cast into plates, allowed
to cure, and thereafter be bolted to the armor plate 86. The spall backing material
is formed of materials such that the composite backing was an impedance which is tailored
so that the tensile stress is reduced below that required for spall formation. The
spall backing material breaks up into fine, low energy, non-penetrating fragments
after absorbing the shock wave.
[0036] The spall backing materials tested in the cross-referenced co-pending application
were primarily alumina-type ceramics, whereas the spall backing material of the present
invention are primarily metal and ceramic powder loaded polymer composites.
DISCUSSION OF THE SPECIFIC PROBLEMS
[0037] Spall generated from armor plate used on combat vehicles, as a result of being overmatched
by shaped charge or projectile attacks, is perhaps the largest contributor to casualties
and fire power kills. Spall consists of a cloud of high velocity fragments ejected
from the back surface of an armor plate due to an impact on the front surface. The
present state-of-the-art method for prevention of damage from spall is to place aramid
fiber reinforced plastic liners (sometimes referred to as panels or plates) behind
the armor in order to catch the spall particles. These liners, specified for application
in armored personnel carriers and fighting vehicles, require significant space for
crew member efficiency and for mounting hardware to the inner vehicle surfaces, and
have limited ability to function after a single hit.
[0038] The space aspects are especially important in that internal volume is very limited
in most light and all heavy armored combat vehicles. In the personnel carriers, the
liners are sometimes mounted 16 inches off the inner surface of the armor plate on
a sliding rail system (for access behind the liners) whose weight equals that of the
liner panels. A four inch standoff is used for most applications in the fighting vehicle,
which limits efficiency. it would be very desirable to regain some or all of this
lost volume without a loss of protection. In both types of light vehicles, there are
significant areas, such as turret and driver areas, where protection is either limited
or nonexistent due to lack of space for any stand-off liners. All armored vehicle
purchasers would be interested in space and weight efficient spall suppression systems
at reasonable costs.
APPROACH TO THE PROBLEMS
[0039] The primary spall backing material 82 (Fig. 8) and 82a (Fig. 9) is placed in contact
with the armor and has an impedance which is tailored such that the reflected tensile
stress is reduced below that required for spall formation. This backing material breaks
up into fine, low-energy, nonpenetrating fragments after absorbing the shock wave.
This material preferably consists of metal powder filled polymers but the metal powders
may be mixed with ceramic and glass powders, or fibers and whiskers. A relatively
light secondary plate 92a (Fig. 9) of different material, spaced one or two inches
from the armor 86a, may be used to fully suppress secondary particles of disrupted
jet and armor. This system 90 has demonstrated improved performance at short stand-off
spaces compared to prior art liners.
[0040] As indicated previously but stated in a different way, spall can be characterized
as a cloud of high velocity fragments of fractured material ejected from the back
surface of an armor plate 86 (Fig. 8) due to impulse loading on the front surface
of the plate. The impulse typically results from the impact of a high velocity projectile
or a shaped charge jet and its slug as indicated by the attack arrow 94 in Figure
8. The impulse induces a compressive shock wave which propagates through the armor
plate 86, and reflects from the rear free surface as a tensile wave. The reflected
tensile wave superimposes with the incident compressive wave until at some distance
from the back surface the tensile stress rises to a level sufficient to cause nucleation
and growth of fracture. At this point, the strain energy remaining in the material
between the fracture plane and the back surface is released as kinetic energy and
the spall particles are ejected with significant kinetic energy.
[0041] When a shock wave interacts with an interface, such as interlayer 88, between two
materials the situation is considerably more complex. As an illustration, consider
a planar wave traveling perpendicular to the interface. As the wave impinges upon
the interface, both a transmitted and a reflected wave will form. The intensity and
sign (tensile or compressive) of the transmitted and reflected waves are a function
of the sonic impedance of the material (the impedance is the product of the density
and sound speed of the material). For instance, the relative intensity of the reflective
wave compared to the incident wave can be expressed as a function of the relative
impedance of the backing material 82 compared to that of the armor plate 86.
[0042] The impedance ratio (n) is determined by the following formula where Z₁ is the sonic
impedance of the armor plate 86, where Z₂ is the sonic impedance of the backing material,
where the subscript
r and
i refer to the reflected and incident wave, and where the letter "a" refers to the
stress amplitude.
[0043] As can be seen, when n is less than 1 (that is, where the backing material 82 has
an impedance below that of the armor plate 84) the reflected wave is tensile at a
fraction of the amplitude of the incident wave; for n = 1 there is no reflected wave;
and for n that is greater than 1, the reflected wave is compressive.
[0044] Although complete elimination of spall or fractures in the armor plate 86 and in
the backing material 82 appears to be desirable, the added weight to the vehicle is
objectionable. In contrast, the backing material of the present invention is a frangible
or low strength backing, which subsequent to suppression of spall in the armor, fractures
into particles of low mass and/or velocity and low penetration capability. The requirements
for backing material 82,82a are then: 1) the impedance of the backing material must
be such that the stress reflected into the armor is below that which would cause armor
spall; and 2) the fragments from the fracture of the backing material (caused by the
transmitted stress) must have low penetration capacity.
[0045] It has been discovered that an interaction occurs between the jet and backing material
causing fine flying target and jet particles to be dispersed behind the armor. It
is unclear what mechanism causes this effect but two possibilities have been considered.
One explanation is that the shock waves in the vicinity of the penetration are causing
local disruption of the jet/armor penetration interface. The other is that relief
of pressure as the jet penetrates the back surface of the backing material 82 (Fig.
8) and 82a (Fig. 9) imparts a lateral force on the jet and target material which carries
portions thereof through by the penetration process. The number and dispersion of
these particles has been significantly reduced, although not eliminated, through continued
development of the primary backing material. The remaining particles can be defeated
with the relatively thin secondary plate 92a (Fig. 9) spaced from for instance, one
to four inches off the back of the armor plate 84a. The double layer system 90 when
using aluminum armor, with a two inch space, has demonstrated nominally equivalent
performance, at lower weight, compared to the aramid fiber system in contact or with
a four inch space.
[0046] As mentioned previously, primary backing materials have progressed from commercial
alumina ceramics, to ceramic and metal powder loaded polymer composites.
[0047] The powder loaded composites, especially the metal loaded composites are the materials
of choice for two major reasons. First, they yield reduced dispersion of the hypervelocity
particles discussed above. Secondly, the areal density of the backing materials was
found to be proportional to its impedance; the composites allow tailoring of the backing
materials impedance to optimal values.
[0048] While the performance of the present single layer system 80 (Fig. 8) and double layer
system 90 (Fig. 9) are already satisfactory, there is a potential for eliminating
the secondary layer 92a (Fig. 9), with consequential reduction in weight, space, mounting
hardware and complexity. This would constitute a major breakthrough in small liner
design, and make application feasible on any interior surface of an armored vehicle.
[0049] In testing to date, reduced dispersion of hypervelocity particles was observed with
backing materials 82 (Fig. 8) loaded with metal powders (copper and steel alloys)
compared with those loaded with alumina powders when both materials have similar impedance
values. The volume percent loading with metal powders is almost half that with alumina
powder due to the much higher density of the metals. The metal loaded composites also
have lower elastic modulii. While it is presently unknown which mechanical properties
control the jet/target interaction, it does appear that reduced particle loading will
lead to reduced interaction.
[0050] With the current state of polymer science, the viscoelastic properties of the backing
material matrix should be tailored such that the required impedance could be obtained
with lower particle loading thereby potentially limiting the spall disruption and
also eliminating the requirement for a secondary plate 92a as shown in Figure 9. The
elimination or reduction of the metal or ceramic fillers will provide lighter, more
compact designs with fewer human factors and safety concerns related to inhalation
of small hypervelocity particles or powders after attack.
[0051] The passage of a shock wave through a polymeric matrix is a complex process dependent
upon a number of factors. Polymers are viscoelastic in nature: that is, their mechanical
properties, such as complex share modulii (G*), complex elastic modulus (G′), and
complex shear loss modulus (G˝), are rated and temperature sensitive. These properties
also influence the impedance of the material as shown below.
[0052] The mechanical impedance of a polymer element to a stress wave is the sum of two
components given by the expression:
Zm = Rm + IXm
Where the value of ZM is the characteristic complex impedance, Rm is the mechanical
resistance, and Xm is the mechanical reactance.
[0053] These components are given by:
Rm = (p/2)
[1/2] [G
′2+G
˝2)
[1/2] + G′
[1/2]
Xm = (p/2)
[1/2] [(G′²+G
˝2)
[1/2] - G′ ]
[1/2]
[0054] Where G′ and G˝ are the viscoelastic properties described above. As can be seen,
tailoring of the impedance can be accomplished through control of the viscoelastic
properties. Fillers and plasticizers can significantly influence the viscoelastic
properties and their rate-temperature dependency, as well as other mechanical responses
such as fracture toughness. The performance of the polymeric phase within the backing
material 82, and that of the loaded polymer, will therefore be reliant upon specific
compositions, ambient temperature, and penetration velocity of the jet or projectile.
[0055] Improved performance is obtained with polymers which exhibit high energy loss and
damping. Interaction of the shock waves in the vicinity of the jet (or projectile)
penetration is then limited and the jet/backing material interaction suppressed. Materials
with secondary fractured toughening mechanisms should also improve performance through
greater energy absorption.
[0056] The initial work performed in the cross referenced application concentrated on ceramic
materials exclusively. Fully fired, unfired, and bisque fired alumina all functioned
in suppressing spall in aluminum armor plate. The angular distribution and energy
of spall particles, and other behind-armor debris, is measured by examination of penetration
holes in a thin steel sheet called a witness sheet such as sheet 54 (Fig. 3). The
sheet (not shown in Figure 8) is placed some distance behind the armor plate 86 and
backing material 82. While spall was eliminated in the backing material, and the angle
of distribution of damage shown on the witness plates decrease compared to unbacked
armor plate 86, there is still a significant number of penetrations in the witness
plate when using ceramic materials.
[0057] The nature of the witness plate penetrations from spall backing material 82 and/or
armor plate 86 is considerably different than from spall penetrations from an armor
plate without spall backing material as illustrated in Figures 10-13. A penetration
hole from a spall particle from armor plate alone shows only a shear lip in the direction
of penetration. The diameter of the penetration from armor plate 86 and backing material
82 were smaller and show a raised edge on both the front and back of the sheet, typically
of hypervelocity penetration. Small indentations formed by these particles in steel
plates were analyzed. Both aluminum and copper were found, indicating that the interaction
occurs between the copper jet slug and the spall backing material, causing dispersion
of fine particles from the armor plate 86 and the shaped charge jet (not shown) behind
the plate 86.
[0058] The original concept of the cross-referenced application was to have the impedance
of the backing material equal to or above that of the armor plate 86 to insure that
no tensile stress was reflected. However, an analysis made to determine the effect
of the backing material properties on total system weight indicates that the required
weight of primary backing material 82 increases proportionally to increasing impedance
and increasing wavelength of the stress wave. Accordingly, the concept was changed
to utilize materials whose impedance allowed some tensiled reflection, but not enough
to cause spall fracture to occur.
[0059] Four ballistic test series were conducted consisting of 130 shaped charge shots.
Warheads for these evaluations included 105 mm and TOW-2 simulants at 0, 37, and 53
degrees obliquities. Armor plate alloys including 5083 (MIL-A-4602G(MR)Z and 7039
(MIL-A-46063F) aluminum, and RHA steel (MIL-A-12560) at wall thicknesses ranging from
1 to 2". The performance variables measured were spall volume, penetration hole area,
and the angle of dispersion of penetrations in the witness sheets. Prior art unbacked
and aramid filter backed armor targets were tested for baseline comparison during
system development. High speed photography was also conducted to examine the jet/target
interaction.
[0060] For the first test series an alumina particle loaded polymer system was selected
as having a tailorable impedance which can be easily varied by using different amounts
of alumina particles in the polymer. An eight factor 1/8th fractional factorial experimental
matrix was included to investigate the effect on performance of warhead obliquity,
alloy type, alloy thickness, polymer type, aluminum particle size, aluminum loading
content, and spall backing material thickness. Response variables measured for correlation
to performance include the volume of spall in the armor and the angle of dispersion
of particles (Fig. 2) penetrating the witness sheet. The only statistically significant
factor in this matrix were alloy type and warhead obliquity. In further tests, decreasing
the loading of the epoxy from 60 to 47 volume percent showed some decrease tendency
to cause jet/target interaction, while maintaining spall suppression in the aluminum
armor.
[0061] The minimum allowable impedance of these backing material composites 82 (Fig. 8)
to suppress spall in aluminum armor 86 was found to be about 0.65 g/cm²us (grams per
centimeter squared per microsecond), which compared to 1.44 g/cm²us for the impedance
of the aluminum armor. Impedance was determined by multiplication of sample density
by the measured velocity of ultrasonic wave transmission. In addition, a proof-of-principle
test of fully fired alumina backed RHA steel was conducted which successfully suppressed
spall in the steel.
[0062] The objective of the second test series was to identify methods of suppressing the
hypervelocity particles from the jet/target interaction. Two methods were evaluated,
powder substitution and addition of a secondary layer of backing material. Additional
powders were evaluated as fillers in the polymeric matrix. Copper, bronze, stainless
steel, magnesia (MgO), and spinel (MgAl₂O₄) powders were tested, along with alumina
powders, in a matrix of a toughened epoxy. These powders were selected to give a broad
range of powder, and consequently mechanical properties of the backing material. Prior
to fabrication of the target materials, samples of each composite were produced and
their impedance measured. This allowed production of backing materials with similar
impedance values.
[0063] Due to the higher density of the metal powders, the volume loading of the metal loaded
epoxies were 30 volume percent versus the 47 volume percent for the ceramic loaded
epoxies. There was a significant reduction observed in the of the angle of dispersment
of the hypervelocity particles with the metal loaded epoxies; the copper and stainless
steel powder materials performed best. The metal loaded polymers have lower hardnesses
and elastic modulii values compared to the ceramic loaded polymers, as well as the
lower loading content. The properties responsible for the reduction in jet/target
interaction are still undetermined.
[0064] While the number and distribution of the hypervelocity penetration holes in the witness
sheet 54 (Fig. 3) decreased when using the single layer system 80 (Fig. 8), their
elimination required a secondary plate 92a (Fig. 9) of material spaced one or two
inches behind the armor plate 86a. When plate 92a was placed in contact with the primary
backing material 82a, it was found to be ineffective in suppressing the particles.
The plate 92a when spaced from the armor plate 86a, acts to defeat the hypervelocity
particles. The space is required to allow some dispersion of the particles away from
the axis of the jet. This prevents the particles from passing through a hole formed
in the secondary plate 92a created by the passage of the weapons jet. Thin plates
92a of aramid fiber and fiberglass composite, ballistic nylon batting and elastomer
sheets all show good performance at low weights to defeat the particles.
[0065] The objective of the third test series was to evaluate the potential for fiber reinforcing
the backing material 82 (Fig. 8) to provide single layer protection. Polmers of toughened
epoxy or silicon rubber were loaded with copper or alumina powders and used as the
matrix for aramid fiber or fiberglass cloth reinforced composites. These armor plate
targets 86 suppressed spall formation. However, similar to those in the previous series
with the secondary layer in contact with the primary backing material 82, they were
not found to be completely effective in suppressing the hypervelocity particles.
[0066] The backings in the series were placed on 1-3/4" of 5083 aluminum armor plate 86;
all previous tests had been done on a maximum of 1-1/2" of 5083 armor plate. Unreinforced
materials, similar in loading and thickness to those from the previous test series,
were used as controls. These fiber reinforced materials, did not fully suppress spall
in the 1-3/4" aluminum as they did in the 1-1/2" aluminum tests without fiber reinforced
materials. In parallel with these ballistic tests, a simulation computer test was
run using two dimensional hydrocode computer program, to estimate the difference in
stress state in different thicknesses of armor. Impact was modelled in an axisymmetric
configuration with a copper rod impacting semi-infinite aluminum with similar condition
to those in the tests. Pressure was calculated at depths of 1" and 1-1/2" and at points
from 1" to 2-1/2" increments off the axis of penetration. The axes of the attack arrows
94,94a illustrated in Figures 8 and 9, respectively, are the axes of penetration for
the two targets, which axes are illustrated as being at 0° obliquity.
[0067] Examining the points 1" off axis, it was seen that the stress wave had both higher
amplitude and duration at the 1-1/2" depth. The results of these tests indicate that
the backing material 82 must therefore be specifically designed for a specific thickness
of armor.
[0068] The objective of the fourth series of ballistic tests was two-fold. The first objective
was to determine the minimum volume loading and thickness (or total areal density)
of the primary backing material 82 required to suppress spall in 1" of 5083 and 7039
aluminum, and for 1-3/4" thick 5083 aluminum. Stainless steel powder in a toughened
epoxy matrix was used at 15, 20, 25, 30, 35 and 40 volume percent thicknesses of 1/8,
3/16, 1/4, and 5/16 of an inch.
[0069] As mentioned previously, 130 test shots were made with 105 milliimeter, TOW-II and
Rockeye warheads. The results of a portion of the shots are illustrated in Tables
1-6.
[0070] The data in the several tables indicate the armor thickness and type, the warheads,
the degrees of obliquity, the spall cone angles as determined in .024" thick soft
steel witness plates for unbacked, aramid fiber composite backed, and various types
of active spall suppression armor of the present invention.
[0071] It will be apparent that the smaller the secondary spall cone angle (Fig. 2), the
better the protection since less soft targets in the vehicle will be hit with spall.
As is conventional when describing the weight of military armor, the amount of square
feet of armor required in a vehicle is determined, and the pounds per square foot
(PSF) is used rather than the pounds per cubic foot, to provide the desired weight
comparison. In all tests, the spacing is measured from the back surface of the armor.
[0072] Figure 10 illustrates a witness plate 100 that was mounted behind an armor plate
without spall backing material illustrating a plurality of lethal spall holes 102
having a spall cone angle of about 90 degrees. The witness plate also illustrate a
large central hole 104 which is formed by the jet and the jet slug.
[0073] Figure 11 illustrates a witness plate 100a subjected to the same test conditions
as Figure 10 except that the armor plate armor plate was backed by a single layer
of 4.5 PSF aramid fiber spaced 4" behind the target. This test indicates by the pattern
of spall holes 102a that the aramid fiber backing material reduced the spall cone
angle to about 27 degrees with very little lethal spall being shown, and with a jet
and slug hole 104a of reduced size.
[0074] Figure 12 illustrates a witness plate 100b subjected to the same test conditions
as the test of Figure 10 but with the armor plate being backed by a single layer of
4.3 SPF attached to the back of the armor plate. This test shows a main pattern of
spall holes 102b within about the same spall cone angle of about 27 degrees but shows
several other spall holes 102b′ within about a 39 degree spall cone angle. The jet
and slug hole 104b is slightly larger than that of Figure 11.
[0075] Figure 13 illustrates a witness plate 100c subjected to the same tests condition
as the test of Figure 10 but with the armor plate being backed by a 2.8 PSF primary
spall backing material in contact with the back of the armor and a 1.5 PSF aramid
fiber secondary backing spaced 2" from the rear of the armor plate. This test illustrates
spall angle of about 25 degrees with the most spall holes 102c within that range but
several spall holes 102c′ being slightly out of that angle. The witness plate also
illustrates a jet hole 104c and a slug hole 106 spaced from each other thereby indicating
that the secondary backing material deflected the slug.
TABLE 1
1-3/4" 5083 ALUMINUM AGAINST 105 mm WARHEADS AT 0 DEGREES OBLIQUITY |
BACKING |
SPACE |
WEIGHT |
CONE ANGLE |
UNBACKED ARMOR |
|
|
|
93 |
DEG. |
ARAMID FIBER COMPOSITE |
4" |
4.5 |
PSF |
27 |
DEG. |
2 LAYER ACTIVE SPALL SYSTEM |
|
|
|
25 |
DEG. |
30% COPPER /SILICONE RUBBER |
CONTACT |
2.8 |
PSF |
|
|
ARAMID FIBER COMPOSITE SHEET |
2" |
1.5 |
PSF |
|
|
TOTAL WEIGHT |
|
4.3 |
PSF |
|
|
ARAMID FIBER COMPOSITE |
CONTACT |
4.5 |
PSF |
60 |
DEG. |
1 LAYER REINFORCED ACTIVE SPALL SYSTEM |
|
|
|
|
|
COPPER/FIBERGLASS/SILICONE RUBBER |
CONTACT |
4.3 |
PSF |
39 |
DEG. |
TABLE 2
1" 5083 ALUMINUM AGAINST 105 mm WARHEADS AT 0 DEGREES OBLIQUITY |
BACKING |
SPACE |
WEIGHT |
CONE ANGLE |
UNBACKED ARMOR |
|
|
|
67 |
DEG. |
2 LAYER ACTIVE SPALL SYSTEM |
|
|
|
18 |
DEG. |
30% STAINLESS STEEL/EPOXY |
CONTACT |
2.8 |
PSF |
|
|
ARAMID FIBER COMPOSITE SHEET |
2.25" |
1.2 |
PSF |
|
|
TOTAL WEIGHT |
|
4.0 |
PSF |
|
|
2 LAYER ACTIVE SPALL SYSTEM |
|
|
|
20 |
DEG. |
30% STAINLESS STEEL/EPOXY |
CONTACT |
2.0 |
PSF |
|
|
ARAMID FIBER COMPOSITE SHEET |
1" |
2.0 |
PSF |
|
|
TOTAL WEIGHT |
|
4.0 |
PSF |
|
|
2 LAYER ACTIVE SPALL SYSTEM |
|
|
|
28 |
DEG. |
30% STAINLESS STEEL/EPOXY |
CONTACT |
2.8 |
PSF |
|
|
ELASTOMER SHEET |
2" |
0.8 |
PSF |
|
|
TOTAL WEIGHT |
|
3.8 |
PSF |
|
|
TABLE 3
1" 5083 ALUMINUM AGAINST 105 mm WARHEADS AT 53 DEGREES OBLIQUITY |
BACKING |
SPACE |
WEIGHT |
CONE ANGLE |
UNBACKED ARMOR |
|
|
|
88 |
DEG. |
ARAMID FIBER COMPOSITE |
CONTACT |
4.5 |
PSF |
77 |
DEG. |
1 LAYER ACTIVE SPALL SYSTEM |
|
|
|
55 |
DEG. |
56% ALUMINA/SILICONE RUBBER |
CONTACT |
4.7 |
PSF |
|
|
TABLE 4
2"RHA STEEL AGAINST TOW-2 WARHEADS AT 0 DEGREES OBLIQUITY |
BACKING |
SPACE |
WEIGHT |
CONE ANGLE |
UNBACKED ARMOR |
|
|
|
91 |
DEG. |
ARAMID FIBER COMPOSITE |
CONTACT |
9.0 |
PSF |
70 |
DEG. |
2 LAYER ACTIVE SPALL SYSTEM |
|
|
|
58 |
DEG. |
35% TUNGSTEN/SILICONE RUBBER |
CONTACT |
9.5 |
PSF |
|
|
ARAMID FIBER COMPOSITE |
1" |
3.0 |
PSF |
|
|
TOTAL WEIGHT |
|
12.5 |
PSF |
|
|
TABLE 5
1" RHA STEEL AGAINST ROCKEYE WARHEADS AT 0 DEGREES OBLIQUITY |
BACKING |
SPACE |
WEIGHT |
CONE ANGLE |
UNBACKED ARMOR |
|
|
|
87 |
DEG. |
ARAMID FIBER COMPOSITE |
CONTACT |
9.0 |
PSF |
32 |
DEG. |
1 LAYER ACTIVE SPALL SYSTEM |
|
|
|
20 |
DEG. |
25% TUNGSTEN/SILICONE RUBBER |
CONTACT |
7.4 |
PSF |
|
|
2 LAYER ACTIVE SPALL SYSTEM |
|
|
|
10 |
DEG. |
30% TUNGSTEN/SILICONE RUBBER |
CONTACT |
8.2 |
PSF |
|
|
ARAMID FIBER COMPOSITE |
1" |
1.55 |
PSF |
|
|
TOTAL WEIGHT |
|
9.75 |
PSF |
|
|
TABLE 6
1-3/4" 5083 ALUMINUM AGAINST TOW-2 WARHEADS AT 0 DEGREES OBLIQUITY |
BACKING |
SPACE |
WEIGHT |
CONE ANGLE |
UNBACKED ARMOR |
|
|
|
103 |
DEG. |
ARAMID FIBER COMPOSITE |
16" |
4.5 |
PSF |
22 |
DEG. |
1 LAYER ACTIVE SPALL SYSTEM |
|
|
|
82 |
DEG. |
10% TUNGSTEN/SILICONE RUBBER |
CONTACT |
3.8 |
PSF |
|
|
2 LAYER ACTIVE SPALL SYSTEM |
|
|
|
55 |
DEG. |
25% STAINLESS STEEL/EPOXY |
CONTACT |
3.7 |
PSF |
|
|
ARAMID FIBER COMPOSITE |
2" |
1.0 |
PSF |
|
|
TOTAL WEIGHT |
|
4.7 |
PSF |
|
|
2 LAYER ACTIVE SPALL SYSTEM |
|
|
|
26 |
DEG. |
13% TUNGSTEN/SILICONE RUBBER |
CONTACT |
4.5 |
PSF |
|
|
ARAMID FIBER COMPOSITE |
16" |
0.5 |
PSF |
|
|
TOTAL WEIGHT |
|
5.0 |
PSF |
|
|
[0076] As indicated in Table 6, a test matrix was provided to examine the performance of
tungsten powder loaded silicone elastomers. The silicone elastomer was selected for
three reasons: a) It has relatively low strength to allow very fine particulation
of the material from the transmitted shock wave; b) It has high elongation to failure
which should limit the damage area from the jet penetration; and c) It is relatively
highly attenuating for shock waves which may limit the interaction and consequential
distribution of hypervelocity jet particles. The tests include volume loading of 25
to 35 percent of tungsten for application to RHA steel armor, and 10 to 13 percent
for application to 5083 aluminum armor. Single (Fig. 8) and two layer (Fig. 9) systems
80 and 90, respectively, where investigated when using the RHA steel armor and when
using the 5083 aluminum armor. In the single layers system 80, the distribution of
hypervelocity particles was the lowest seen to date with this particular warhead.
In addition, the two layer system using the RHA steel armor performed considerably
better than a layer of aramid fiber composite in contact with the armor equivalent
in thickness to the active spall suppression armor disclosed in the cross referenced
Musante et al application.
TEST CONCLUSIONS
[0077] From the testing to date the following conclusions can be drawn relative to the cross
referenced Musante et al system:
Concerning the Primary Layer In Contact With The Armor
[0078] The primary backing material may be either a monolithic or a composite material.
The preferred material is a composite material which may be tailored to the specific
optimal properties required.
Monolithic Material
[0079] Monolithic materials, such as sodium chloride, which have appropriate fracture and
impedance properties may be used. Fracture properties include either low strength
or frangibility; that is, the material must break-up into particles of low mass or
kinetic energy after the shock wave is transmitted into the backing.
Composite Matrix Material
[0080] The matrix polymer may be of almost any type of relatively high strength epoxies
to low strength elastomeric materials. The preferred materials appear to be relatively
low strength, high elongation elastomers. In particular, materials which are highly
dampening to shock and sound waves will function best in order to limit the disruption
of the jet and dispersion of jet and target particles behind the armor.
Composite Particulates/Fillers
[0081] The materials which will be loaded into the matrix may be single or combinations
of metals, ceramics, glass, or organic material in particulate, whiskers, or fiber
form which allow tailoring of the composite to the appropriate impedance level. Fiber
or whisker additions may be advantageous for the layer to give additional protection
to the armor against penetration from projectiles. In particular, high density materials
are preferred in order to limit the volume loading of the polymer and thereby limit
the distribution of the jet and dispersion of jet and target particles behind the
armor. The preferred material for loading is tungsten powder due to its high density
and low toxicity. The optimal range of loading levels of tungsten is up to 25 volume
percent for aluminum armor plate, and up to 50 volume percent for steel armor plate.
In addition the porosity, introduced into the composite matrix material from a gas
or from hollow particulates, would be advantageous to cause a attenuation of shock
waves to limit the disruption of the jet and dispersion of jet and target particles
behind the armor, and further to reduce the weight required.
Thickness
[0082] The thickness of the contact layer required will be dependent upon the impedance
of the material and the length of the shock pulse in the armor. Thicknesses which
have been successful range from 1/8" to about 1-1/2".
Impedance
[0083] The impedance level must be sufficient to reduce the amplitude of the reflected shock
wave in the armor below that required for significant spall to form. While ideally
no spall should form, the weight of the total system may be reduced if some amount
of spall in the armor is allowed to form as long as this spall either remains attached
to the armor, or is limited to a narrow angle of dispersion off the axis of the jet
due to the nature of its fracture, influence from the primary layer, or influence
from a secondary layer. The impedance required will then reduce the reflected shock
wave such that the formation of spall is limited, and the kinetic energy of any spall
that does not form will also be limited.
Configuration
[0084] The layer of material loaded into the matrix may be of uniform or nonuniform loading.
For ease of manufacture the layer may be uniform, while for optimal performance, the
layer may be of graded impedance. The grading of the impedance may both decrease the
weight of the material required, and limit the distribution of the jet and dispersion
of jet and target particles behind the armor.
Attachment
[0085] The backing material may be attached to the armor either with a separate adhesive
or by direct bonding from the matrix material. Processes could include casting, troweling,
or spraying of the composite when in the uncured state, with subsequent curing in
place on the armor interior surface. The preferred adhesive is a tough, high elongation
to failure polymer material.
Concerning The Secondary Plate
[0086] It should be noted that the secondary plate 92a (Fig. 9) is not absolutely necessary
for the Figure 8 and/or Figure 9 system, but constitutes an advantage for particular
designs and requirements.
Material
[0087] The secondary plate material 92a (Fig. 9) may consist of single or multiple component
polymers or of reinforced polymers. Limitation of the dispersion of the disputed jet
and target particles has been accomplished with thermoplastic polymers, with rigid,
thermoset resin matrix fiber reinforced polymers, and with elastomeric matrix fiber
reinforced polymers.
Weight
[0088] The required weight of the secondary plate 92a is dependent upon the amount of disruption
of the jet and dispersion of the jet and target particles and to the distance the
plate is spaced off the armor. Weights (expressed in pounds per square foot - PSF)
found to function in limiting the dispersion range are from 0.5 to 3 PSF.
Spacing
[0089] The stand off spacing of the secondary plate 92a effects the dispersion of the disrupted
jet and target particles behind the armor 86a and backing material 82a. Larger spacing
are more efficient, but up to 4 inches have been found to be sufficient. In particular,
spacing in the range of 1 to 2 inches off the interior surface of the interlayer 88a
are sufficient while still offering a compact package.
Attachment of Secondary Plate
[0090] The attachment method should be such that the layer remains attached to the armor
plate 86a after experiencing the loads resulting from the jet penetration and blast
wave loading of the secondary layer. The preferred method is bolting the plate 92a
to studs 96a welded to the armor.
Configuration
[0091] While all work has been done with a single secondary plate 92a there may be advantages
to splitting this "secondary plate" into multiple plates. For instance, two thin plates,
one at 1" stand off and one at 1-1/2" stand off, may be more efficient than equivalent
weight of a single layer of 1-1/2" standoff. In addition, a contact layer alone or
in combination with a spaced layer may be of benefit.
Concerning The Spall Formation Weapon Type
Type
[0093] Shaped charge warheads are the weapon for which spall suppression has been demonstrated.
The single layer system 80 (Fig. 8) and the double layer system 90 (Fig. 9) should
also be suitable for suppression of spall from other weapons, especially those with
spall as a major lethality mechanism. The weapons include, but are not limited to:
explosively formed projectiles (EFP'S), high explosive squash heads (HESH), fragmenting
artilliary shells, and directed energy weapons. This includes all shock wave forming
mechanisms including projectile and jet impacts, explosive detonations, and high speed
ablation.
[0094] From the foregoing description it will be apparent that single and double layer spall
suppression systems have been disclosed for preventing or suppressing warhead induced
formations of highly penetrating spall. Both systems include an armor plate and at
least a primary backing material which contacts the rear surface of the armor plate
and is formed from a metal or ceramic loaded composite spall backing material which
if fractured by stress transmitted through the metal armor form light, particles of
low mass and kinetic energy. The primary backing material has a sonic impedance relative
to that of the metal armor which suppresses formation of spall in the armor. A second
plate may be attached to and spaced from the armor to reduce the angle of dispersement
from secondary fragments of the armor and weapon.
[0095] Although the best mode contemplated for carrying out the present invention has been
herein shown and described it will be apparent that modification and variation may
be made without departing from what is regarded to be the subject matter of the invention.
1. An apparatus for suppressing spall from being created on the inside surface of
metal armor when the outside surface is being subjected to an impulse load from a
weapon causing a compressive stress and shock wave to be applied through the thickness
of the armor, comprising:
means defining a primary powder loaded composite spall backing material which if fractured
due to stress transmitted through the metal armor will form particles of low mass,
low kinetic energy and low penetration capability, said spall backing material having
a sonic impedance relative to the sonic impedance of the metal armor such that the
stress reflected into the armor by the backing material at least suppresses the formation
of significant spall in the armor; and
means for maintaining said spall backing material in contiguous contact with said
inner surface of said metal armor.
2. An apparatus according to claim 1 wherein said composite spall backing material
is formed with an elastomeric matrix.
3. An apparatus according to claim 1 wherein said spall backing material has a sonic
impedance which reduced the reflected tensile stress below that required for spall
formation which causes the spall backing material to break into fine, low energy,
nonpenetrating hypervelocity particles after absorbing the shock wave.
4. An apparatus according to claim 1 wherein the impedance of the backing material
is such that the stress reflected into the armor is below that which would cause spall
failure from the metal armor and wherein fragments from stress transmitted fractures
of the backing material are of low penetration capability and non-lethal.
5. An apparatus according to claim 2 wherein the metal in said metal loaded composite
is copper powder.
6. An apparatus according to claim 2 wherein the metal in said metal loaded composite
is a steel alloy powder.
7. An apparatus according to claim 2 wherein the metal loaded composite material allows
tailoring of the backing material to optimum value for protecting a specific type
and thickness of the armor.
8. An apparatus according to claim 2 wherein the metal loaded composite spall backing
material has a low elastic modulus.
9. An apparatus according to claim 2 wherein the spall backing material has viscoelastic
properties such that the required impedance is obtain with small amounts of metal
powder thereby minimizing spall disruption, inhalation of hypervelocity particles
in response to being hit by a weapon, and providing a spall backing material of reduced
weight.
10. An apparatus according to claim 2 wherein said backing material has an impedance
which provides tensile reflection into the armor which is less than that which will
cause spall fracture to occur.
11. An apparatus according to claim 2 wherein said backing material has low hardness
and elastic modulii values for providing smaller hypervelocity particles.
12. An apparatus according to claim 2 and additionally comprising a secondary backing
plate spaced from said primary backing material for precluding said hypervelocity
particles from passing through a hole formed in the secondary backing plate by a component
of the weapon.
13. An apparatus according to claim 2 wherein said armor is formed from alumimum,
and wherein the minimum allowable impedance of said composite spall backing material
to suppress spall from said aluminum armor is about 0.65 grams per square centimeter
per microsecond.
14. An apparatus according to claim 2 wherein said powder may be any one of the following;
bronze, stainless steel, magnesia (MgO), spinel (MgAl₂O₄), tungsten, and tungsten
carbide, and any high density particle.
15. An apparatus according to claim 1 wherein the metal in said backing material is
tungsten powder in a silicone elastomer having relatively low strength allowing fine
particulation of the material from a weapon transmitted shock wave, and further has
high elongation before failure.
16. A spall suppression composite elastomeric matrix backing material as an article
of manufacture comprising:
an elastomer in said matrix; and
a metal powder loaded in said elastomer.
17. An article of manufacture according to claim 16 wherein said backing material
has a minimum allowable impedance of about 0.65 g/cm²us when abutting aluminum armor.
18. An article of manufacture according to claim 16 wherein said metal powder is uniformly
dispersed within an epoxy resin of the composite elastomeric matrix.
19. An article of manufacture according to claim 16 wherein said metal powder is non-uniformly
dispersed within said elastomeric matrix for providing graded impedance for decreasing
the weight of the packing material.
20. An article of manufacture according to claim 16 wherein said composite polymeric
matrix is a toughened epoxy matrix.
21. An article of manufacture according to claim 16 wherein the thickness of the composite
polymeric matrix is between about 1/8" and 1-1/2".
22. An article of manufacture according to claim 18 wherein said metal powder is tungsten
powder which forms between about 5-50 volume percent of the composite polymeric matrix
backing material.
23. An article of manufacture according to claim 18 wherein said metal powder is mixed
with a fiber for providing additional protection against penetration from a projectile.
24. An article of manufacture according to claim 16 wherein said metal powder is stainless
steel.
25. An article of manufacture according to claim 17 wherein said metal powder is of
high density.
26. An article of manufacture according to claim 16 wherein said metal powder is copper.
27. An article of manufacture according to claim 16 wherein said metal powder is bronze.
28. A method of suppressing lethal spall from being discharged from one surface of
an armor plate when another surface of the plate is subjected to a stress sufficient
to form lethal spall on said one surface when protected by spall backing material,
comprising the steps of:
placing a powder loaded composite spall backing material which if fractured due to
stress transmitted through the metal armor plate forms light non-lethal hypervelocity
particles of low mass and kinetic energy, said spall backing material having a sonic
impedance relative to the sonic impedance of the metal armor such that the stress
reflected into the armor by the backing material at least suppresses the formation
of spall in the armor; and
maintaining said spall backing material in contiguous contact with said inner surface
of said metal armor.
29. A method according to claim 28 wherein said spall backing material has a sonic
impedance which reduces the reflected tensile stress below that required for spall
release in the armor plate which causes the spall backing material adjacent said one
surface of the armor plate to break into fine, low-energy, non-penetrating particles
after absorbing the shock.
30. A method according to claim 28 wherein the spall backing material has viscoelastic
properties such that the required impedance is obtained with small amounts of metal
powder thereby minimizing spall disruption, inhalation of hypervelocity particles
in response to being contacted by a weapon, and provides a spall backing material
of reduced weight.
31. A method according to claim 28 wherein said metal powder is uniformly dispersed
within said composite material.
32. A method according to claim 28 wherein said metal powder is non-uniformly dispersed
within said composite material for providing graded impedance for decreasing the weight
of the backing material and for tailoring the backing material impedance to optimal
values.
33. A method according to claim 27 wherein said backing material has an impedance
which allows tensile reflection that is less than that which will cause spall fracture
to occur.
34. A method according to claim 28 wherein said backing material includes tungsten
powder in a silicone elastomer which forms said spall backing material and which allows
very fine particulation of the material resulting from transmitted shock waves and
has high elongation to failure.
35. A method according to claim 28 wherein said backing material is a monolithic material
consisting of a mass exhibiting solid uniformity and one harmonious pattern throughout
having low strength and frangibility.
36. A method according to claim 35 wherein the spall backing material has relatively
low strength and high elongation characteristics providing high damping to shock and
sound waves.
37. A method according to claim 28 wherein the composite backing materials include
metal powders and fibers for tailoring the composite to the appropriate impedance
level.
38. A method according to claim 28 wherein the powdered metal is tungsten powder having
high density and low toxicity.
39. A method according to claim 28 wherein the thickness of the backing material is
within the range of about 1/8" to about 1-1/2".
40. A method according to claim 28 and additionally comprising the step of controlling
the weight of the backing material which is reduced by tailoring the spall backing
material to allow a small amount of armor plate spall to form and remain attached
to the armor as a bulge.
41. A method according to claim 28 and additionally comprising the step of attaching
the uncured spall backing material to the armor plate by direct bonding from matrix
materials which form the backing material.
42. A method according to claim 28 and additionally comprising the step of attaching
the spall backing material by a separate adhesive.
43. A method according to claim 28 and additionally comprising the step of mounting
a secondary plate formed from polymers at a predetermined distance from said spall
backing material for limiting the angle of dispersion of jet slug and armor plate
particles.
44. A method according to claim 43 wherein said predetermined distances is up to about
4" away from said one surface of the armor plate.
45. A method according to claim 27 wherein the spall backing material has relatively
low strength and high elongation characteristics providing high damping to shock and
sound waves.
46. A method according to claim 44 wherein the thickness of the backing material is
within the range of about 1/8" to about 1-1/2" .
47. A method according to claim 44 and additionally comprising the step of mounting
a secondary plate formed from polymers at a predetermined distance from said spall
backing material for limiting the angle of dispersion of particles from the jet slug
and armor plate.
48. An apparatus according to claim 1 wherein when contacted by a 105 mm warhead at
0 degree obliquity, the apparatus provides a secondary spall cone angle of about 39°
when said primary spall backing material includes copper powder, fiberglass and silicone
rubber weighing about 4.3 PSF and is placed in contact with the inside surface of
the metal armor of 1-3/4" 5083 aluminum.
49. An apparatus according to claim 1 wherein when contacted by a 105 mm warhead at
0 degrees obliquity the apparatus provides a secondary spall cone angle of about 60°
when said primary spall backing material is a composite of aramid fiber weighing about
4.5 PSF and is placed in contact with the inside surface of the metal armor of 1-3/4"
5083 aluminum.
50. An apparatus according to claim 12 wherein when contacted by a 105 mm warhead
at 0 degrees obliquity, the apparatus provides a secondary spall cone angle of about
25° when said primary spall backing material includes 30% copper in silicone rubber
and weights 2.8 PSF and is placed in contact with the inside surface of the metal
armor of 1-3/4" 5083 aluminum; and wherein the secondary backing plate is formed from
an aramid fiber composite weighing 1.5 PSF and is placed about 2" away from the inside
surface of the metal armor.
51. An apparatus according to claim 12 wherein when contacted by a 105 mm warhead
at 0 degrees obliquity, the apparatus provides a secondary spall cone angle of about
18° when said primary spall backing material includes 30% stainless steel/epoxy weighing
2.8 PSF and is placed in contact with the inside surface of the metal armor of 1"
5083 aluminum; and wherein the secondary backing plate is formed from an aramid fiber
composite weighing 1.2 PSF and is placed about 2.25" away from the inside surface
of the metal armor.
52. An apparatus according to claim 12 wherein when contacted by a TOW-2 warhead at
0 degrees obliquity, the apparatus provides a secondary cone angle of about 58° when
said primary spall backing material includes 35% tungsten/silicone rubber which weighs
9.5 PSF and is placed in contact with the inside surface of the metal armor of 2"
RHA steel; and wherein said secondary backing plate is formed from an aramid fiber
composite weighing 1.5 PSF and is placed about 2" away from the inside surface of
the metal armor.
53. An apparatus according to claim 1 wherein when contacted by a Rockeye warhead
at 0 degrees obliquity, the apparatus provides a secondary spall cone angle of about
32° when the primary spall backing material includes 25% tungsten/silicone rubber
and weighs about 7.4 PSF and is placed in contact with the inside surface of the metal
armor of 1" RHA steel.
54. An apparatus according to claim 12 wherein when contacted by a Rockeye warhead
at 0 degrees obliquity, the apparatus provides a secondary spall cone angle of about
10° when the primary spall backing material includes 30% tungsten/silicone rubber
about 8.2 PSF and is placed in contact with the inside surface of metal armor of 1"
RHA steel; and wherein said secondary backing material is formed from aramid fiber
composite weighing 1.55 PSF and is placed about 1" away from the inside surface of
the metal.